Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 124
Filter
1.
Ann Surg ; 274(1): 107-113, 2021 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31460881

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to understand variation in intraoperative and postoperative utilization for common general surgery procedures. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Reducing surgical costs is paramount to the viability of hospitals. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of electronic health record data for 7762 operations from 2 health systems. Adult patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, appendectomy, and inguinal/femoral hernia repair between November 1, 2013 and November 30, 2017 were reviewed for 3 utilization measures: intraoperative disposable supply costs, procedure time, and postoperative length of stay (LOS). Crossed hierarchical regression models were fit to understand case-mixed adjusted variation in utilization across surgeons and locations and to rank surgeons. RESULTS: The number of surgeons performing each type of operation ranged from 20 to 63. The variation explained by surgeons ranged from 8.9% to 38.2% for supply costs, from 15.1% to 54.6% for procedure time, and from 1.3% to 7.0% for postoperative LOS. The variation explained by location ranged from 12.1% to 26.3% for supply costs, from 0.2% to 2.5% for procedure time, and from 0.0% to 31.8% for postoperative LOS. There was a positive correlation (ρ = 0.49, P = 0.03) between surgeons' higher supply costs and longer procedure times for hernia repair, but there was no correlation between other utilization measures for hernia repair and no correlation between any of the utilization measures for laparoscopic appendectomy or cholecystectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons are significant drivers of variation in surgical supply costs and procedure time, but much less so for postoperative LOS. Intraoperative and postoperative utilization profiles can be generated for individual surgeons and may be an important tool for reducing surgical costs.


Subject(s)
Hospital Costs , Intraoperative Care/economics , Postoperative Care/economics , Surgical Procedures, Operative/economics , Adult , Aged , Appendectomy/economics , California , Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic/economics , Cost Control , Equipment and Supplies, Hospital/economics , Female , Herniorrhaphy/economics , Humans , Laparoscopy/economics , Length of Stay/economics , Male , Middle Aged , Operative Time , Retrospective Studies
2.
Br J Anaesth ; 124(2): 136-145, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31866001

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to simulate and compare the healthcare and economic outcomes associated with routine use of intraoperative transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with those associated with a scenario where TOE is not routinely used. METHODS: The impact of TOE on surgical decision-making was estimated through a systematic literature review. Individual short-term morbidity and mortality estimates were generated by application of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk calculator. Long-term event rates, unit costs, and utility weights were sourced from published literature and expert opinion. A discrete-event simulation model was then constructed to simulate both the in-hospital and post-discharge outcomes for patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Robustness of the base case results was examined through deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €30 000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained was assumed to represent acceptable cost-effectiveness. RESULTS: Routine use of intraoperative TOE was associated with lower costs and higher benefits per patient, which indicates that use of TOE is a dominant strategy. The intervention resulted in the avoidance of 299 cardiac complications, 20 strokes, and 11 all-cause deaths per 10 000 patients. Routine intraoperative TOE was associated with an increased occurrence of bleeding owing to more valvular surgery and subsequent long-term anticoagulation. CONCLUSIONS: Routine intraoperative TOE is a cost-effective procedure for patients undergoing cardiac surgery, leading to lower overall costs. It was associated with a decrease in long-term complications including stroke, cardiac complications, and death, although there was a slight increase in extracranial bleeding events.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Surgical Procedures , Cost-Benefit Analysis/economics , Echocardiography, Transesophageal/economics , Intraoperative Care/economics , Intraoperative Care/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Computer Simulation , Cost-Benefit Analysis/statistics & numerical data , Echocardiography, Transesophageal/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult
3.
J Ultrasound Med ; 39(5): 911-917, 2020 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31737930

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: In partial mastectomy (PM) or lumpectomy, ultrasound (US) localization avoids discomfort and additional procedures associated with wire localization. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between ultrasound-visible clip (UVC) use at the time of biopsy and US use during resection, hypothesizing that UVCs facilitate US localization and reduce costs compared with traditional radiopaque clips or no clip placement. METHODS: The study population consisted of adult female patients with breast cancer undergoing PM or lumpectomy at our institution between 2014 and 2016. The core biopsy clip type and localization method during PM were characterized as wire localization versus US localization, and associations were estimated with multivariable regression models. For the cost evaluation, breast biopsy data were obtained from the Department of Radiology. RESULTS: Among 674 patients, 490 had data on localization and the clip type. Ultrasound-visible clip placement at biopsy increased US use during resection by 13% (95% confidence interval, 6%-21%). There was no difference in the total specimen weight with US versus wire localization. The cost savings for using UVCs for the 2209 patients who underwent breast biopsy from 2014 to 2016 was $36,000. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that US localization for PM is feasible at a single institution and cost-effective when facilitated by UVCs. Placement of a UVC at the time of biopsy is recommended, as it is cost-effective and avoids the discomfort and inconvenience of wire localization.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Intraoperative Care/methods , Mastectomy, Segmental/methods , Surgical Instruments/economics , Ultrasonography, Mammary/methods , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biopsy , Breast/diagnostic imaging , Breast/pathology , Breast/surgery , Breast Neoplasms/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis/economics , Female , Humans , Intraoperative Care/economics , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Ultrasonography, Mammary/economics
4.
Radiology ; 291(3): 689-697, 2019 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30912721

ABSTRACT

Background Intraoperative MRI has been shown to improve gross-total resection of high-grade glioma. However, to the knowledge of the authors, the cost-effectiveness of intraoperative MRI has not been established. Purpose To construct a clinical decision analysis model for assessing intraoperative MRI in the treatment of high-grade glioma. Materials and Methods An integrated five-state microsimulation model was constructed to follow patients with high-grade glioma. One-hundred-thousand patients treated with intraoperative MRI were compared with 100 000 patients who were treated without intraoperative MRI from initial resection and debulking until death (median age at initial resection, 55 years). After the operation and treatment of complications, patients existed in one of three health states: progression-free survival (PFS), progressive disease, or dead. Patients with recurrence were offered up to two repeated resections. PFS, valuation of health states (utility values), probabilities, and costs were obtained from randomized controlled trials whenever possible. Otherwise, national databases, registries, and nonrandomized trials were used. Uncertainty in model inputs was assessed by using deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. A health care perspective was used for this analysis. A willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained was used to determine cost efficacy. Results Intraoperative MRI yielded an incremental benefit of 0.18 QALYs (1.34 QALYs with intraoperative MRI vs 1.16 QALYs without) at an incremental cost of $13 447 ($176 460 with intraoperative MRI vs $163 013 without) in microsimulation modeling, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $76 442 per QALY. Because of parameter distributions, probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrated that intraoperative MRI had a 99.5% chance of cost-effectiveness at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000 per QALY. Conclusion Intraoperative MRI is likely to be a cost-effective modality in the treatment of high-grade glioma. © RSNA, 2019 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Bettmann in this issue.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Glioma/diagnostic imaging , Intraoperative Care/economics , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/economics , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/economics , Brain/diagnostic imaging , Brain Neoplasms/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Glioma/economics , Humans , Middle Aged
5.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 220(4): 369.e1-369.e7, 2019 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30685289

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Gynecologists debate the optimal use for intraoperative cystoscopy at the time of benign hysterectomy. Although adding cystoscopy leads to additional up-front cost, it may also enable intraoperative detection of a urinary tract injury that may otherwise go unnoticed. Prompt injury detection and intraoperative repair decreases morbidity and is less costly than postoperative diagnosis and treatment. Because urinary tract injury is rare and not easily studied in a prospective fashion, decision analysis provides a method for evaluating the cost associated with varying strategies for use of cystoscopy. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to quantify costs of routine cystoscopy, selective cystoscopy, or no cystoscopy with benign hysterectomy. STUDY DESIGN: We created a decision analysis model using TreeAge Pro. Separate models evaluated cystoscopy following abdominal, laparoscopic/robotic, and vaginal hysterectomy from the perspective of a third-party payer. We modeled bladder and ureteral injuries detected intraoperatively and postoperatively. Ureteral injury detection included false-positive and false-negative results. Potential costs included diagnostics (imaging, repeat cystoscopy) and treatment (office/emergency room visits, readmission, ureteral stenting, cystotomy closure, ureteral reimplantation). Our model included costs of peritonitis, urinoma, and vesicovaginal/ureterovaginal fistula. Complication rates were determined from published literature. Costs were gathered from Medicare reimbursement as well as published literature when procedure codes could not accurately capture additional length of stay or work-up related to complications. RESULTS: From prior studies, bladder injury incidence was 1.75%, 0.93%, and 2.91% for abdominal, laparoscopic/robotic, and vaginal hysterectomy, respectively. Ureteral injury incidence was 1.61%, 0.46%, and 0.46%, respectively. Hysterectomy costs without cystoscopy varied from $884.89 to $1121.91. Selective cystoscopy added $13.20-26.13 compared with no cystoscopy. Routine cystoscopy added $51.39-57.86 compared with selective cystoscopy. With the increasing risk of injury, selective cystoscopy becomes cost saving. When bladder injury exceeds 4.48-11.44% (based on surgical route) or ureteral injury exceeds 3.96-8.95%, selective cystoscopy costs less than no cystoscopy. Therefore, if surgeons estimate the risk of injury has exceeded these thresholds, cystoscopy may be cost saving. However, for routine cystoscopy to be cost saving, the risk of bladder injury would need to exceed 20.59-47.24% and ureteral injury 27.22-37.72%. Model robustness was checked with multiple 1-way sensitivity analyses, and no relevant thresholds for model variables other than injury rates were identified. CONCLUSION: While routine cystoscopy increased the cost $64.59-83.99, selective cystoscopy had lower increases ($13.20-26.13). These costs are reduced/eliminated with increasing risk of injury. Even a modest increase in suspicion for injury should prompt selective cystoscopy with benign hysterectomy.


Subject(s)
Cystoscopy/methods , Decision Support Techniques , Health Care Costs , Hysterectomy/methods , Intraoperative Complications/diagnosis , Ureter/injuries , Urinary Bladder/injuries , Uterine Diseases/surgery , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Cystoscopy/economics , Female , Humans , Hysterectomy/economics , Intraoperative Care/economics , Intraoperative Care/methods , Intraoperative Complications/economics , Intraoperative Complications/surgery
6.
J Arthroplasty ; 34(2): 215-220, 2019 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30482665

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Smoking is associated with adverse outcomes after total joint arthroplasty (TJA), including periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Although preoperative smoking cessation interventions may help reduce the risk PJI, the short-term cost-effectiveness of these programs remains unclear. METHODS: Decision analysis was used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a preoperative smoking cessation intervention over a 90-day TJA episode of care. Costs and probabilities were derived from literature review and published Medicare data. Thresholds for cost and efficacy of the intervention were determined using sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: In our model, the average 90-day cost was $32 less for patients enrolled in a mandatory smoking cessation intervention ($23,457) compared with patients who were not ($23,489). In sensitivity analyses, the smoking cessation intervention was cost-saving vs no intervention when the short-term cost of PJI was greater than $95,410, the rate of PJI was reduced by at least 25% for former vs current smokers, the cost of the intervention was less than $219, or the success rate of the intervention was greater than 56%. CONCLUSION: Smoking cessation interventions prior to TJA can increase the value of care and are an important public health initiative. Routine referral to smoking cessation interventions should be considered for smokers indicated for TJA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, economic and decision analyses.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement/economics , Intraoperative Care/economics , Smoking Cessation/economics , Arthroplasty , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Decision Support Techniques , Humans , Smoking
7.
Anesthesiology ; 128(2): 328-337, 2018 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29194062

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cost-effectiveness analyses on cell salvage for cesarean delivery to inform national and societal guidelines on obstetric blood management are lacking. This study examined the cost-effectiveness of cell salvage strategies in obstetric hemorrhage from a societal perspective. METHODS: Markov decision analysis modeling compared the cost-effectiveness of three strategies: use of cell salvage for every cesarean delivery, cell salvage use for high-risk cases, and no cell salvage. A societal perspective and lifetime horizon was assumed for the base case of a 26-yr-old primiparous woman presenting for cesarean delivery. Each strategy integrated probabilities of hemorrhage, hysterectomy, transfusion reactions, emergency procedures, and cell salvage utilization; utilities for quality of life; and costs at the societal level. One-way and Monte Carlo probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. A threshold of $100,000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained was used as a cost-effectiveness criterion. RESULTS: Cell salvage use for cases at high risk for hemorrhage was cost-effective (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, $34,881 per quality-adjusted life-year gained). Routine cell salvage use for all cesarean deliveries was not cost-effective, costing $415,488 per quality-adjusted life-year gained. Results were not sensitive to individual variation of other model parameters. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that at the $100,000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained threshold, there is more than 85% likelihood that cell salvage use for cases at high risk for hemorrhage is favorable. CONCLUSIONS: The use of cell salvage for cases at high risk for obstetric hemorrhage is economically reasonable; routine cell salvage use for all cesarean deliveries is not. These findings can inform the development of public policies such as guidelines on management of obstetric hemorrhage.


Subject(s)
Blood Loss, Surgical , Cesarean Section/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis/economics , Intraoperative Care/economics , Operative Blood Salvage/economics , Salvage Therapy/economics , Adult , Cost-Benefit Analysis/methods , Cost-Benefit Analysis/statistics & numerical data , Decision Support Techniques , Female , Humans , Intraoperative Care/methods , Markov Chains , Monte Carlo Method , Pregnancy , Salvage Therapy/methods
8.
J Surg Res ; 231: 441-447, 2018 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30278966

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Re-excision rates after breast conservation surgery are reported to be 20%-40%. Inaccuracies with specimen orientation may affect margin assessment. This study examined whether the addition of surgeon performed intraoperative inking of the lumpectomy specimen after adoption of margin guidelines would be cost-effective. METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospective surgical database was performed from 2009 to 2017. Patients with initial lumpectomy and a preoperative diagnosis of invasive breast carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) were included. Re-excision rates and the surgical costs per 100 initial lumpectomies were compared across three periods: before margin guideline publication, after guideline adoption, and after the addition of intraoperative surgeon performed specimen inking. RESULTS: Four hundred initial lumpectomies were evaluated. Overall re-excision rate was 21% (n = 84). There was a nonsignificant reduction in re-excision rates after margin guidelines from 24% (n = 36) to 20% (n = 23) and to 19% (n = 25) after addition of intraoperative specimen ink. Re-excision rates were significantly lower for invasive cancer than for DCIS across three periods (20%, 15%, and 12% versus 37%, 33%, and 31%) (odds ratio 3.31, P = 0.007). The estimated cost of re-excision per 100 initial lumpectomies decreased after guidelines by 25% ($128,270) for invasive breast cancer and by 11% ($102,616) for DCIS. The addition of intraoperative specimen inking after margin guideline adoption resulted in further 17% cost savings ($66,692) for invasive breast cancer and 5% ($41,308) for DCIS. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeon performed intraoperative inking of the lumpectomy specimen after adoption of margin guidelines is a cost-effective technique in breast conservation surgery.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Intraoperative Care/economics , Margins of Excision , Mastectomy, Segmental/economics , Staining and Labeling/economics , Surgeons/economics , Breast Neoplasms/economics , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/economics , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/surgery , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/economics , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/surgery , Cost Savings/statistics & numerical data , Female , Florida , Humans , Intraoperative Care/methods , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Reoperation/economics , Reoperation/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies
9.
J Surg Oncol ; 116(6): 683-689, 2017 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28608393

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The low availability and poor access to external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in developing countries makes it hard for women with breast cancer to receive breast conservation. We studied the effect of providing intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) on the travel time, distance, and costs of in the Mexico City Metropolitan Area (MCMA). METHODS: Sixty-nine patients treated between January 2013 and September 2014 were analyzed. Travel distance and transit time was calculated using Google Maps. The time and distance patients living in the MCMA treated with IORT would have spent if they had received EBRT was calculated. Cost analysis for each modality was performed. RESULTS: 71% (n = 49) lived in the MCMA. Sixteen (33%) received additional EBRT and 33 (66%) received IORT only. Mean driving distance and transit time of those 33 women was 132.6 km (SD 25.7) and 66 min (SD 32.9). Patients from the MCMA receiving IORT alone avoided 990 visits, 43 700 km and 65 400 min in transit. IORT led to a 12% reduction in costs per patient. CONCLUSIONS: By reducing costs and time needed for patients to receive radiotherapy, IORT could potentially enhance access to breast conservation in resource-limited developing countries.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/economics , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Health Services Accessibility/economics , Travel/economics , Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Combined Modality Therapy , Developing Countries , Female , Health Care Costs , Humans , Intraoperative Care/economics , Intraoperative Care/methods , Mexico , Middle Aged , Radiotherapy/economics , Radiotherapy/methods , Time Factors
10.
Can J Surg ; 60(2): 94-100, 2017 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28234217

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Obtaining intraoperative cultures of allograft bone just before use in orthopedic procedures is standard practice in many centres; however, the association between positive cultures and subsequent surgical infections is unknown. Our study had 3 goals: to determine the prevalence of positive intraoperative allograft culture and subsequent infection; to determine if, in cases of subsequent infection, organisms isolated at reoperation were the same as those cultured from the allograft at the time of the index procedure; and to assess the costs associated with performing intraoperative allograft cultures. METHODS: In this retrospective case series, we obtained data on patients receiving allograft bone between 2009 and 2012. Patients receiving allograft with positive cultures were reviewed to identify cases of significant infection. Organisms isolated at reoperation were compared with the allograft culture taken at the time of implantation, and we performed a cost assessment. RESULTS: Of the 996 allograft bone grafts used, 43 (4.3%) had positive intraoperative cultures and significant postoperative infections developed in 2, requiring reoperation. Antibiotics based on culture results were prescribed in 24% of cases. Organisms cultured at the time of reoperation differed from those isolated initially. The cost of performing 996 allograft cultures was $169 320. CONCLUSION: This series suggests that rates of positive intraoperative bone allograft culture are low, and subsequent infection is rare. In cases of postoperative infection, primary allograft culture and secondary tissue cultures isolated different organisms. Costs associated with performing cultures are high. Eliminating initial culture testing could save $42 500 per year in our health region.


CONTEXTE: L'obtention de cultures d'allogreffes osseuses peropératoires juste avant une intervention orthopédique est une pratique standard dans de nombreux centres. Or, on ignore s'il y a un lien entre des résultats de cultures positifs et les infections chirurgicales subséquentes. Notre étude avait 3 objectifs : déterminer la prévalence des cultures d'allogreffes peropératoires positives et des infections subséquentes; déterminer si, dans les cas d'infections subséquentes, les agents pathogènes isolés lors d'une réintervention étaient les mêmes que dans les spécimens prélevés sur les allogreffes au moment des interventions initiales; évaluer les coûts associés à l'obtention des cultures d'allogreffes peropératoires. MÉTHODES: Dans cette série de cas rétrospectifs, nous avons réuni des données sur des patients receveurs d'allogreffes osseuses entre 2009 et 2012. Nous avons passé en revue les cas d'allogreffes dont les résultats de culture étaient positifs pour recenser ceux qui étaient porteurs d'une infection significative. Nous avons comparé les agents pathogènes isolés lors de la réintervention à ceux de la culture de l'allogreffe effectuée lors de l'implantation, et nous avons procédé à une évaluation des coûts. RÉSULTATS: Parmi les 996 allogreffes osseuses effectuées, 43 (4,3 %) avaient des résultats positifs aux cultures peropératoires; des infections postopératoires significatives se sont déclarées dans 2 de ces cas et ont nécessité une réintervention. Des antibiotiques ont été prescrits en fonction des résultats des cultures dans 24 % des cas. Les agents pathogènes isolés en culture au moment de la réintervention étaient différents de ceux qui avaient été initialement isolés. Le coût des 996 cultures d'allogreffes s'est élevé à 169 320 $. CONCLUSION: Cette série donne à penser que les taux de résultats de cultures d'allogreffes osseuses peropératoires positifs sont bas et que les infections subséquentes sont rares. Dans les cas d'infections postopératoires, les cultures des allogreffes primaires et les cultures tissulaires secondaires ont révélé la présence d'organismes pathogènes différents. Les coûts associés à la réalisation des cultures sont élevés. Éliminer les cultures initiales permettrait à notre région de santé d'économiser 42 500 $ par année.


Subject(s)
Allografts/microbiology , Bone Transplantation/standards , Intraoperative Care/standards , Reoperation/standards , Surgical Wound Infection/microbiology , Allografts/economics , Allografts/statistics & numerical data , Bone Transplantation/adverse effects , Bone Transplantation/economics , Bone Transplantation/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Intraoperative Care/economics , Intraoperative Care/statistics & numerical data , Male , Prevalence , Reoperation/economics , Reoperation/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Surgical Wound Infection/drug therapy , Surgical Wound Infection/economics , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology
11.
HPB (Oxford) ; 19(10): 881-888, 2017 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28716508

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The total cost of bile duct injuries (BDIs) in an unselected national cohort of patients undergoing cholecystectomy are unknown. The aim was to evaluate costs associated with treatment of cholecystectomy-related BDIs and to calculate cost effectiveness of routine vs. on-demand intraoperative cholangiography (IOC). METHODS: Data from Swedish patients suffering a BDI during a 5 year period were analysed. Questionnaires to investigate loss-of-production and health status (EQ-5D) were distributed to patients who suffered a BDI during cholecystectomy and who underwent uneventful cholecystectomy (matched control group). Costs per quality-adjusted-life-year (QALY) gained by intraoperative diagnosis were estimated for two strategies: routine versus on-demand IOC during cholecystectomy. RESULTS: Intraoperative diagnosis, immediate intraoperative repair, and minor BDI were all associated with reduced direct treatment costs compared to postoperative diagnosis, delayed repair, and major BDI (all p < 0.001). No difference was noted in loss-of-production for minor versus major BDIs or between different treatment strategies. The cost per QALY gained with routine intraoperative cholangiography (ICER-incremental cost-effectiveness ratio) to achieve intraoperative diagnosis was €50,000. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative detection and immediate intraoperative repair is the superior strategy with less than half the cost and superior functional patient outcomes than postoperative diagnosis and delayed repair. The cost per QALY gained (ICER) using routine IOC was considered reasonable.


Subject(s)
Bile Duct Diseases/economics , Bile Ducts/diagnostic imaging , Cholangiography/economics , Cholecystectomy/economics , Health Care Costs , Iatrogenic Disease/economics , Absenteeism , Bile Duct Diseases/diagnosis , Bile Duct Diseases/etiology , Bile Duct Diseases/therapy , Bile Ducts/injuries , Cholecystectomy/adverse effects , Cost Savings , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Health Status , Humans , Iatrogenic Disease/prevention & control , Intraoperative Care/economics , Predictive Value of Tests , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Registries , Sick Leave/economics , Sweden , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
12.
Ann Surg ; 263(6): 1164-72, 2016 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26575281

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of routine intraoperative ultrasonography (IOUS), cholangiography (IOC), or expectant management without imaging (EM) for investigation of clinically silent common bile duct (CBD) stones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. BACKGROUND: The optimal algorithm for the evaluation of clinically silent CBD stones during routine cholecystectomy is unclear. METHODS: A decision tree model of CBD exploration was developed to determine the optimal diagnostic approach based on preoperative probability of choledocholithiasis. The model was parameterized with meta-analyses of previously published studies. The primary outcome was incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained from each diagnostic strategy. A secondary outcome was the percentage of missed stones. Costs were from the perspective of the third party payer and sensitivity analyses were performed on all model parameters. RESULTS: In the base case analysis with a prevalence of stones of 9%, IOUS was the optimal strategy, yielding more QALYs (0.9858 vs 0.9825) at a lower expected cost ($311 vs $574) than EM. IOC yielded more QALYs than EM in the base case (0.9854) but at a much higher cost ($1122). IOUS remained dominant as long as the preoperative probability of stones was above 3%; EM was the optimal strategy if the probability was less than 3%. The percentage of missed stones was 1.5% for IOUS, 1.8% for IOC and 9% for EM. CONCLUSIONS: In the detection and resultant management of CBD stones for the majority of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, IOUS is cost-effective relative to IOC and EM.


Subject(s)
Cholangiography/economics , Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic , Choledocholithiasis/diagnostic imaging , Choledocholithiasis/surgery , Intraoperative Care/economics , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Ultrasonography/economics , Watchful Waiting/economics , Algorithms , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Decision Trees , Humans
13.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 23(2): 490-3, 2016 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26438436

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Permanent paraffin subareolar biopsy during nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) tests for occult cancer at the nipple-areolar complex. Intraoperative subareolar frozen section can provide earlier detection intraoperatively. Cost analysis for intraoperative subareolar frozen section has never been performed. METHODS: NSM cases from 2006-2013 were reviewed. Patient records including financial charges were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 480 subareolar biopsies for NSM from 2006-2013, 21 were abnormal (4.4 %). A total of 307 of the subareolar biopsies included intraoperative frozen section. Of the 307, 12 (3.9 %) were abnormal with 7 of 12 detected on intraoperative frozen section. The median baseline charge for an intraoperative subareolar frozen section was $309 for an estimated total cost of $94,863 in 307 breasts. The median baseline charge for interval operative resection of a nipple-areolar complex following an abnormal subareolar pathology result was $11,021. Intraoperative subareolar biopsy avoided an estimated six return trips to the operating room for savings of $66,126. At our institution, routine use of intraoperative frozen section resulted in an additional $28,737 in healthcare charges or $95 per breast. CONCLUSIONS: We present the first cost analysis to evaluate intraoperative subareolar frozen section in NSM. This practice obviated an estimated six return trips to the operating room. With our institutional frequency of abnormal subareolar pathology, intraoperative frozen sections resulted in a marginal increased charge per mastectomy.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/economics , Costs and Cost Analysis , Intraoperative Care/economics , Mastectomy/economics , Nipples/pathology , Organ Sparing Treatments/economics , Biopsy, Needle , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Frozen Sections , Humans , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies
14.
Pancreatology ; 16(4): 652-7, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27117595

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Health care spending is increasing the world over. Determining preventable or correctable factors may offer us valuable insights into developing strategies aimed at reducing costs and improving patient care. The aim of this study was to conduct an exploratory analysis of clinical factors influencing costs of Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). METHODS: The financial and clinical records of 173 consecutive patients who underwent PD at a tertiary care referral centre, between January 2013 and June 2015 were analysed. RESULTS: Complications, by themselves, did not increase costs associated with PD unless they resulted in an increase in the duration of stay more than 11 days. Intraoperative blood transfusion (p-.098) and performance of an end-to-side PJ (p-.043) were independent factors significantly affecting costs. Synchronous venous resections significantly increased costs (p-.006) without affecting duration of stay. Advancing age, hypertension, neurological and respiratory disorders, preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), performance of a feeding jejunostomy, and surgical complications eg PPH, POPF and DGE significantly increased the duration of stay sufficient enough to influence costs of PD. CONCLUSIONS: It is not the merely the development, but severity of complications that significantly increase the cost of PD by increasing hospital stay. Strategies aimed at reducing intraoperative blood transfusion requirement as well as minimising the development of POPF can help reduce costs. Synchronous venous resections significantly increase costs independent of hospital stay. This study identified nine factors that may be included in the development of a preoperative nomogram that could be used in preoperative financial counselling of patients undergoing PD.


Subject(s)
Pancreaticoduodenectomy/economics , Blood Transfusion/economics , Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde/economics , Delivery of Health Care , Gastric Emptying , Humans , India , Intraoperative Care/economics , Length of Stay , Pancreatic Fistula/economics , Pancreatic Fistula/etiology , Pancreaticoduodenectomy/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/economics , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Hemorrhage/economics
15.
J Surg Res ; 200(1): 21-7, 2016 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26237992

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The administration of blood products during pediatric cardiac surgery is common. We sought to determine if thromboelastography (TEG) is a cost-effective tool to reduce blood product transfusion in open pediatric cardiac surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective case-control study was undertaken for 150 pediatric cardiac patients requiring cardiopulmonary bypass from January 2010-May 2012, in a University-affiliated pediatric hospital. Fifty sequential patients operated on when TEG was used were compared with 100 control patients before TEG availability. Groups were matched 2:1 for age and risk adjustment for congenital heart surgery score. Blood product utilization was compared between groups, as were outcomes metrics such as postoperative complications, length of stay, and hospital costs of transfusions. RESULTS: Demographic variables, risk adjustment for congenital heart surgery score classifications, and cardiopulmonary bypass times were similar between groups. Red cell and plasma transfusion were comparable between groups. TEG patients saw a substantial reduction in the administration of platelet (1 versus 2.2 U; P < 0.0001) and cryoprecipitate (0.7 versus 1.7 U; P < 0.0001) transfusions. A greater than 50% reductions in hospital costs of platelet ($595 versus $1309) and cryoprecipitate ($39 versus $94) transfusions were observed in the TEG group. Mortality, length of stay, ventilator requirements, postoperative bleeding, and thrombotic events were equivalent. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative TEG use reduced platelet and cryoprecipitate transfusions without an increase in postoperative complications. TEG is a cost-effective method to direct blood product replacement.


Subject(s)
Blood Component Transfusion/statistics & numerical data , Cardiac Surgical Procedures/economics , Cost Savings/statistics & numerical data , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Hospital Costs/statistics & numerical data , Intraoperative Care/methods , Thrombelastography/economics , Adolescent , Blood Component Transfusion/economics , Cardiopulmonary Bypass , Case-Control Studies , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Intraoperative Care/economics , Length of Stay/economics , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Postoperative Complications/economics , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , Texas , Young Adult
16.
Paediatr Anaesth ; 26(1): 77-83, 2016 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26457895

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Results of a previously published study demonstrated a significant decrease in transfusion requirements and calculated blood loss for pediatric major craniosynostosis surgery, if a ROTEM(®) FIBTEM trigger of <13 mm (early substitution group) was applied as compared to a trigger of <8 mm (conventional group). The aim of this study was a posthoc analysis of the costs for this coagulation management. METHODS: The total volume as well as the number of units or bags for all transfused blood products and coagulation factors were recorded for each case. The number of laboratory and point-of-care coagulation tests was also analyzed. Total blood product costs were calculated according to the local prices per unit. RESULTS: The total cost for all transfused/administered blood products/coagulation factors per patient was a median of 1023EUR (IQR 850EUR-1058EUR) in the early substitution group as compared to a median of 910EUR (IQR 719EUR-1351EUR) in the conventional group (P = 0.81). No difference in the number of coagulation tests performed was observed. CONCLUSION: In this study, the use of a higher fibrinogen trigger was not linked to a significant increase in total costs for transfused blood products and coagulation factors, and may offer an economically equivalent approach to coagulation management.


Subject(s)
Blood Coagulation Factors/economics , Blood Transfusion/economics , Costs and Cost Analysis/statistics & numerical data , Craniosynostoses , Fibrinogen/economics , Intraoperative Care/economics , Adolescent , Blood Coagulation/physiology , Blood Coagulation Factors/administration & dosage , Blood Transfusion/statistics & numerical data , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Fibrinogen/analysis , Hemostatics , Humans , Infant , Intraoperative Care/methods , Male , Prospective Studies
17.
Ann Plast Surg ; 76 Suppl 4: S336-9, 2016 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26835821

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Skin flap necrosis after mastectomy can be a devastating complication significantly affecting patient outcomes. Routine vascular analysis (fluorescein or laser angiography) of mastectomy skin flaps in all patients has been advocated but is of questionable cost-effectiveness. The purpose of this study was to identify the incidence and causative risk factors for mastectomy skin flap necrosis and thereby calculate the fiscal reality of intraoperative vascular screening. METHODS: This is an institutional review board-approved retrospective study of all patients from 2007 to 2013 who underwent mastectomy related to breast cancer. Skin flap necrosis was defined as major if it necessitated return to the operating room. Data analysis was done for determination of causative factors of necrosis, including age, body mass index, smoking, previous irradiation, coronary artery disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, hypertension, gastroesophageal reflux disease, hyperlipidemia, obstructive sleep apnea, asthma, diabetes, thyroid disease, history of lumpectomy, and breast reduction or augmentation. During this time, intraoperative vascular screening was not done. RESULTS: Five hundred eighty-one patients underwent 616 mastectomies with a total of 34 necrotic events (5.5%)-16 major and 18 minor. Analyses via Student t tests, univariate analyses, χ testing, and logistic regression showed that history of smoking was the only patient factor associated with postoperative necrosis (P = 0.008). More frequently represented in the necrosis group, but without statistical significance, are previous lumpectomy (P = 0.069) and immediate reconstruction (P = 0.078).For the entire study period, the actual cost to the hospital for major necrotic events was $7,123.10 or $445.19 for each of the 16 major necrotic events and $209.50 for all 34 necrotic events. Per-patient cost-effective screening would need to be less than $11.54 for all patients, $100.33 for highest risk patients (smokers), and $21.65 for highest risk patients (smokers, previous lumpectomy, and immediate reconstruction). CONCLUSIONS: Vascular screening other than clinical judgment of all patients is not cost effective. However, intraoperative vascular evaluation of high-risk patients is recommended before reconstruction and/or closure. These financial data that incorporate true costs and revenue can guide the use of newer, more expensive technology such as laser angiography and can be extrapolated to other institutions.


Subject(s)
Mastectomy , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Skin/pathology , Surgical Flaps/pathology , Angiography , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Florida , Follow-Up Studies , Hospital Costs/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Incidence , Intraoperative Care/economics , Logistic Models , Necrosis/economics , Necrosis/epidemiology , Necrosis/etiology , Necrosis/prevention & control , Postoperative Complications/economics , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Skin/blood supply , Skin/diagnostic imaging , Surgical Flaps/blood supply
18.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 144(2): 371-8, 2014 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24584875

ABSTRACT

The results from randomized clinical trials are often adopted slowly. This practice potentially prevents many people from benefiting from more effective care. Provide a framework for analyzing clinical trial results to determine whether and when early adoption of novel interventions is appropriate. The framework includes the evaluation of three components: confidence in trial results, impact of early, and late adoption if trial results are reversed or sustained. The adverse impact of early adoption, and the opportunity cost of late adoption are determined using Markov modeling to simulate the impact of early and late adoption in terms of quality of life years and resources gained or lost. We applied the framework to the TARGIT-A randomized clinical trial comparing intraoperative radiation (IORT) to standard external beam radiation (EBRT) and considered these results in the context of trials comparing endocrine therapy with and without radiation therapy in postmenopausal women. Confidence in the TARGIT-A trial 4 year results is high because the peak hazard for local recurrence in the trial is between 2 and 3 years. This is consistent with most trials, and no second peak has been observed in similar patient populations, suggesting that the TARGIT-A trial results are stable. The interventions offer approximately equivalent life expectancy. If IORT local recurrences rate were as high as 10 % at 10 years (which is higher than expected), we would project only 0.002 fewer expected life years (less than 1 day) compared to EBRT if IORT is adopted early. However, there is a $1.7 billion opportunity cost of waiting an additional 5 years to adopt IORT in low risk, hormone-receptor-positive, postmenopausal women. EBRT costs an additional $1467 in indirect costs per patient. Applying an evaluative framework for the adoption of clinical trial results to the TARGIT-A IORT therapy trial results in the assessment that the trial results are stable, early adoption would lead to minimal adverse impact, and substantially less resource use. Both IORT and no radiation are reasonable strategies to adopt.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Decision Support Techniques , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/methods , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Animals , Breast Neoplasms/economics , Female , Humans , Intraoperative Care/economics , Intraoperative Care/methods , Markov Chains , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Postmenopause , Quality of Life , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant/economics , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant/methods , United States
20.
BMC Anesthesiol ; 14: 40, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24891837

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Perioperative goal directed therapy (GDT) can substantially improve the outcomes of high risk surgical patients as shown by many clinical studies. However, the approach needs initial investment and can increase the already very high staff workload. These economic imperatives may be at least partly responsible for weak adherence to the GDT concept. A few models are available for the evaluation of GDT cost-effectiveness, but studies of real economic data based on a recent clinical trial are lacking. In order to address this we have performed a retrospective analysis of the data from the "Intraoperative fluid optimization using stroke volume variation in high risk surgical patients" trial (ISRCTN95085011). METHODS: The health-care payers perspective was used in order to evaluate the perioperative hemodynamic optimization costs. Hospital invoices from all patients included in the trial were extracted. A direct comparison between the study (GDT, N = 60) and control (N = 60) groups was performed. A cost tree was constructed and major cost drivers evaluated. RESULTS: The trial showed a significant improvement in clinical outcomes for GDT treated patients. The mean cost per patient were lower in the GDT group 2877 ± 2336€ vs. 3371 ± 3238€ in controls, but without reaching a statistical significance (p = 0.596). The mean cost of all items except for intraoperative monitoring and infusions were lower for GDT than control but due to the high variability they all failed to reach statistical significance. Those costs associated with clinical care (68 ± 177€ vs. 212 ± 593€; p = 0.023) and ward stay costs (213 ± 108€ vs. 349 ± 467€; p = 0.082) were the most important differences in favour of the GDT group. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative fluid optimization with the use of stroke volume variation and Vigileo/FloTrac system showed not only a substantial improvement of morbidity, but was associated with an economic benefit. The cost-savings observed in the overall costs of postoperative care trend to offset the investment needed to run the GDT strategy and intraoperative monitoring. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN95085011.


Subject(s)
Fluid Therapy/methods , Hemodynamics , Perioperative Care/methods , Stroke Volume , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Costs and Cost Analysis , Fluid Therapy/economics , Humans , Intraoperative Care/economics , Intraoperative Care/methods , Monitoring, Intraoperative/economics , Monitoring, Intraoperative/methods , Perioperative Care/economics , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL