Efficacy and safety of raltegravir plus lamivudine maintenance therapy.

BACKGROUND: Decreasing medication burden with raltegravir plus lamivudine in virologically suppressed persons with HIV (PWH) maintained efficacy and was well tolerated at 24 weeks, but more comprehensive data over longer follow-up are required. METHODS: Prospective 48 week extension phase of the raltegravir plus lamivudine arm from a previous 24 week pilot randomized clinical trial in which virologically suppressed PWH were randomized 2:1 to switch to fixed-dose combination 150 mg lamivudine/300 mg raltegravir twice daily or to continue therapy. In this 48 week extension phase, raltegravir was dosed at 1200 mg/day and lamivudine 300 mg/day. Primary outcome was the proportion of PWH with treatment failure at Week 48. Secondary outcomes were changes in ultrasensitive plasma HIV RNA, HIV DNA in CD4 cells, serum IL-6, ultrasensitive C-reactive protein and sCD14, body composition, sleep quality, quality of life and adverse effects. RESULTS: Between May 2018 and June 2019, 33 PWH were enrolled. One participant experienced virological failure without resistance mutations and re-achieved sustained virological suppression without therapy discontinuation, and two others discontinued therapy due to adverse effects. Treatment failure was 9% (95% CI 2%-24%) and 3% (95% CI 0%-17%) in the ITT and on-treatment populations. There were significant changes between baseline and Week 48 in serum cytokines but not in other secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Switching to raltegravir and lamivudine in PWH with virological suppression maintains efficacy and is well tolerated. This maintenance regimen might be a cost-effective option for PWH at risk of drug-drug interactions or needing to avoid specific toxicities of certain antiretroviral drugs or their negative impact on comorbidities.

Efficacy and safety of dolutegravir/lamivudine in virologically suppressed female participants: week 48 data from the pooled TANGO and SALSA studies.

OBJECTIVES: Women represent >50% of people with HIV globally but have historically been underrepresented in clinical trials. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of switching to dolutegravir/lamivudine (DTG/3TC) vs continuing their current antiretroviral regimen (CAR) by sex assigned at birth (female and male) in virologically suppressed adults with HIV-1 without prior virological failure in a pooled analysis of two randomized controlled trials. METHODS: This analysis included 48-week data from the phase 3 TANGO and SALSA studies. Primary and key secondary endpoints included proportions of participants with HIV-1 RNA ≥50 and <50 copies/mL at week 48, respectively. Safety was also assessed. RESULTS: Of 1234 participants, 250 (DTG/3TC, n = 133; CAR, n = 117) were female at birth. Week 48 proportions of participants with Snapshot HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL were similar regardless of sex at birth (DTG/3TC vs CAR: female, <1% [1/133] vs 2% [2/117]; male, <1% [1/482] vs <1% [3/502]). Proportions with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL were high across sexes and treatment groups (DTG/3TC vs CAR: female, 91% [121/133] vs 89% [104/117]; male, 94% [455/482] vs 94% [471/502]). Immunological response with DTG/3TC was slightly higher in female participants. Incidences of adverse events leading to withdrawal and serious adverse events were low and comparable between treatment groups and across sexes. Weight gain was higher with DTG/3TC than with CAR among female participants aged ≥50 years (treatment difference 2.08 kg [95% confidence interval 0.40-3.75]). CONCLUSIONS: Results confirm the robustness of DTG/3TC as a switch option in virologically suppressed females with HIV-1, with outcomes similar to those in males.

Assessment of weight gain in adult patients living with HIV receiving first-line dolutegravir-based or efavirenz-based ART regimens in routine care clinics in Tshwane district, South Africa: An observational study.

INTRODUCTION: Although dolutegravir (DTG) is deemed stable, safe, cost-effective, and clinically beneficial, it also carries the risk of side effects, including observed weight gain among patients on DTG-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens. We compared weight changes among adults (≥18 years) initiating tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, lamivudine, and dolutegravir (TLD) or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, emtricitabine, and efavirenz (TEE) regimens and those switching from TEE to TLD (TEE-to-TLD switchers) in three large primary care facilities in South Africa METHODS: We conducted a retrospective longitudinal record review using patient medical records, extracting relevant demographic and clinical data from October 2018 to June 2021 from randomly selected adults who initiated TLD or TEE (initiators) and adult TEE-to-TLD switchers. We assessed weight, body mass index (BMI), and percentage weight changes for both groups and fitted linear regression and generalized linear models to determine factors associated with weight and BMI change and percentage weight change ≥10%, respectively, among treatment initiators. We fitted linear mixed-effect models among TEE-to-TLD switchers to consider repeated measures. RESULTS: Of 860 initiators, 450 (52.3%) initiated on TEE and 410 (47.7%) on TLD, with median follow-up of 1.4 years and 1.0 year, respectively. At initiation, 43.3% on TEE and 40.8% on TLD were overweight or obese. TLD initiators had an adjusted higher mean weight gain of 1.6 kg (p < 0.001) and mean BMI gain of 0.51 kg/m2 (p < 0.001) than TEE initiators. Independent risk factors for higher mean weight and BMI included age ≥50 years, male, on ART for >12 months, initial BMI of <18.5 kg/m2, and CD4 counts <200 cells/µL. Of 298 TEE-to-TLD switchers, 36.6% were overweight or obese at TEE initiation. Comparing before and after TLD switch, TEE-to-TLD switchers had an adjusted mean weight of 1.2 kg less while on TLD (p = 0.026). Being overweight and CD4 counts >350 cells/µL were independent risk factors for lower weight gain after TLD switch. CONCLUSIONS: We report more weight gain among TLD than among TEE initiators, although to a lesser extent than previously reported. TEE-to-TLD switchers experienced less weight gain after TLD switch; return to health before receiving TLD may be a contributory factor. The current findings are reassuring for those switching to a DTG-based regimen.

Efficacy and safety of switching to dolutegravir/lamivudine in virologically suppressed people with HIV-1 aged ≥ 50 years: week 48 pooled results from the TANGO and SALSA studies.

BACKGROUND: As the population of people with HIV ages, concerns over managing age-related comorbidities, polypharmacy, immune recovery, and drug-drug interactions while maintaining viral suppression have arisen. We present pooled TANGO and SALSA efficacy and safety results dichotomized by age (< 50 and ≥ 50 years). METHODS: Week 48 data from the open-label phase 3 TANGO and SALSA trials evaluating switch to once-daily dolutegravir/lamivudine (DTG/3TC) fixed-dose combination vs continuing current antiretroviral regimen (CAR) were pooled. Proportions of participants with HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 and < 50 copies/mL (Snapshot, intention-to-treat exposed) and safety were analyzed by age category. Adjusted mean change from baseline in CD4 + cell count was assessed using mixed-models repeated-measures analysis. RESULTS: Of 1234 participants, 80% of whom were male, 29% were aged ≥ 50 years. Among those aged ≥ 50 years, 1/177 (< 1%) DTG/3TC participant and 3/187 (2%) CAR participants had HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies/mL at 48 weeks; proportions with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL were high in both treatment groups (≥ 92%), consistent with overall efficacy and similar to observations in participants aged < 50 years (≥ 93%). Regardless of age category, CD4 + cell count increased or was maintained from baseline with DTG/3TC. Change from baseline in CD4 + /CD8 + ratio was similar across age groups and between treatment groups. One CAR participant aged < 50 years had confirmed virologic withdrawal, but no resistance was detected. In the DTG/3TC group, incidence of adverse events (AEs) was similar across age groups. Proportions of AEs leading to withdrawal were low and comparable between age groups. Although drug-related AEs were generally low, across age groups, drug-related AEs were more frequent in participants who switched to DTG/3TC compared with those who continued CAR. While few serious AEs were observed in both treatment groups, more were reported in participants aged ≥ 50 years vs < 50 years. CONCLUSIONS: Among individuals with HIV-1, switching to DTG/3TC maintained high rates of virologic suppression and demonstrated a favorable safety profile, including in those aged ≥ 50 years despite higher prevalence of concomitant medication use and comorbidities. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: TANGO, NCT03446573 (February 27, 2018); SALSA, NCT04021290 (July 16, 2019).

Clinical study of 400mg efavirenz treatment in newly diagnosed patients with HIV/AIDS.

The efficacy of 400mg efavirenz (EFV) once daily is reported to be similar to that of 600mg EFV. However, EFV-related toxic and side effects of 400mg EFV are significantly reduced. Here, the feasibility of reducing EFV to 400mg once a day in HIV-infected/AIDS patients was evaluated. Fifty patients were included. Patients were given 3TC+TDF+400mg EFV (n=25) or 3TC+TDF+600mg EFV (n=25). The proportion of patients with HIV RNA < 40 copies/mL and the adverse events served as the primary and secondary outcomes, respectively. HIV inhibition rates of the 3TC+TDF+400mg EFV group and 3TC+TDF+600mg EFV group were both 56.52% at week 24 and respectively 100%, 91.3% at week 48. During 48 weeks, 27 cases of adverse events were reported in the 3TC+TDF+400mg EFV group, lower than those in the 3TC+TDF+600mg EFV group, which had 39 cases. Compared with the 3TC+TDF+400mg EFV group, the incidence of transaminase, dizziness, hyperlipidemia and rashes all increased in the 3TC+TDF+600mg EFV group (P>0.05). No serious adverse events of the central nervous system occurred. The incidence of depression, sleep disturbance, and vertigo were similar (P>0.05). The efficacy of 400mg EFV is comparable to 600mg EFV. However, patients receiving 400mg EFV have fewer adverse events.

No Meaningful Drug-Drug Interactions Are Associated with the Coadministration of ACC007, Lamivudine, and Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate.

ACC007 is a new-generation nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) with favorable pharmacokinetic and safety profiles. NNRTIs are typically administered in combination with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors as first-line recommended regimens in several guidelines. Therefore, this open-label, randomized, single-period, parallel-cohort study aimed to assess the drug-drug interactions (DDIs) and safety profiles of ACC007 in combination with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and lamivudine (3TC) in healthy subjects. All 24 screened subjects were randomly assigned to group A or B. On days 1 to 17, 3TC at 300 mg and TDF at 300 mg were taken orally by group A, and ACC007 at 300 mg was coadministered on days 8 to 17. On days 1 to 17, 300 mg of ACC007 was taken orally by group B, and 300 mg 3TC and 300 mg TDF were coadministered on days 8 to 17. When we compared 3TC-TDF versus 3TC-TDF-ACC007 DDIs, the geometric mean ratios (GMRs, with 90% confidence intervals [CIs] in parentheses) of the maximum concentration at steady state (Cmax,ss) and area under the concentration-time curve from 0 h to infinity (i.e., at steady state; AUCss) values for TDF were 108.14% (95.68 to 122.22%) and 89.90% (82.67 to 97.76%) (P = 0.344); for 3TC, these values were 113.48% (91.45 to 140.82%) and 95.33% (83.61 to 108.7%) (P = 0.629). When ACC007 alone was compared to the combination 3TC-TDF-ACC007, the GMRs (90% CIs) of the Cmax,ss and AUCss values for ACC007 were 89.00% (76.35 to 103.74%) and 82.57% (73.27 to 93.05%) (P = 0.375). The coadministration of 3TC-TDF-ACC007 did not significantly affect the time to maximum concentration of any of the drugs in terms of P values. ACC007 combined with 3TC-TDF was generally well tolerated during daily dosing for 17 days with no serious adverse events. Overall, ACC007 and 3TC-TDF had no significant or meaningful interactions and a favorable safety profile, which supports the use of the combination regimen.

Doravirine plus lamivudine two-drug regimen as maintenance antiretroviral therapy in people living with HIV: a French observational study.

BACKGROUND: Two-drug regimens based on integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) and boosted PIs have entered recommended ART. However, INSTIs and boosted PIs may not be suitable for all patients. We aimed to report our experience with doravirine/lamivudine as maintenance therapy in people living with HIV (PLWH) followed in French HIV settings. METHODS: This observational study enrolled all adults who initiated doravirine/lamivudine between 1 September 2019 and 31 October 2021, in French HIV centres participating in the Dat'AIDS cohort. The primary outcome was the rate of virological success (plasma HIV-RNA < 50 copies/mL) at Week (W)48. Secondary outcomes included: rate of treatment discontinuation for non-virological reasons, evolution of CD4 count and CD4/CD8 ratio over follow-up. RESULTS: Fifty patients were included, with 34 (68%) men; median age: 58 years (IQR 51-62), ART duration: 20 years (13-23), duration of virological suppression: 14 years (8-19), CD4 count: 784 cells/mm3 (636-889). Prior to switching, all had plasma HIV-RNA < 50 copies/mL. All but three were naive to doravirine, and 36 (72%) came from a three-drug regimen. Median follow-up was 79 weeks (IQR 60-96). Virological success rate at W48 was 98.0% (95% CI 89.4-99.9). One virological failure occurred at W18 (HIV-RNA = 101 copies/mL) in a patient who briefly discontinued doravirine/lamivudine due to intense nightmares; there was no resistance at baseline and no resistance emergence. There were three strategy discontinuations for adverse events (digestive disorders: n = 2; insomnia: n = 1). There was no significant change in CD4/CD8 ratio, while CD4 T cell count significantly increased. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary findings suggest that doravirine/lamivudine regimens can maintain high levels of viral suppression in highly ART-experienced PLWH with long-term viral suppression, and good CD4+ T cell count.

Effectiveness and tolerability of dolutegravir/lamivudine for the treatment of HIV-1 infection in clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness and tolerability of dolutegravir (DTG)/lamivudine (3TC) among treatment-naive and virologically suppressed treatment-experienced individuals in the multicentre cohort of the Spanish HIV/AIDS Research Network (CoRIS) during the years 2018-2021. METHODS: We used multivariable regression models to compare viral suppression (VS) [HIV RNA viral load (VL) <50 copies/mL] and the change in CD4 cell counts at 24 and 48 (±12) weeks after initiation with dolutegravir/lamivudine or other first-line ART regimens. RESULTS: We included 2160 treatment-naive subjects, among whom 401 (18.6%) started with dolutegravir/lamivudine. The remaining subjects started bictegravir (BIC)/emtricitabine (FTC)/tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) (n = 949, 43.9%), DTG + FTC/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) (n = 282, 13.1%), DTG/3TC/abacavir (ABC) (n = 255, 11.8%), darunavir (DRV)/cobicistat(COBI)/FTC/TAF (n = 147, 6.8%) and elvitegravir (EVG)/COBI/FTC/TAF (n = 126, 5.8%). At 24 and 48 weeks after starting dolutegravir/lamivudine, 91.4% and 93.8% of the subjects, respectively, achieved VS. The probability of achieving VS with dolutegravir/lamivudine was not significantly different compared with any other regimen at 24 or 48 weeks, with the exception of a lower chance of achieving VS at 24 weeks for DRV/COBI/FTC/TAF (adjusted OR: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.30-0.74) compared with dolutegravir/lamivudine.For the analysis of treatment-experienced virally suppressed subjects we included 1456 individuals who switched to dolutegravir/lamivudine, among whom 97.4% and 95.5% maintained VS at 24 and 48 weeks, respectively. During the first 48 weeks after dolutegravir/lamivudine initiation, 1.0% of treatment-naive and 1.5% of treatment-experienced subjects discontinued dolutegravir/lamivudine due to an adverse event. CONCLUSIONS: In this large multicentre cohort, effectiveness and tolerability of dolutegravir/lamivudine were high among treatment-naive and treatment-experienced subjects.

Tolerability of bictegravir/tenofovir alafenamide/emtricitabine versus dolutegravir/lamivudine as maintenance therapy in a real-life setting.

BACKGROUND: While both the burden of therapy and the individual drugs in bictegravir/tenofovir alafenamide/emtricitabine (BIC/TAF/FTC) and dolutegravir/lamivudine differ, it is unclear whether their real-life tolerability may be also different. METHODS: Single-centre, clinical cohort analysis of all virologically suppressed persons with HIV (PWH) who were first prescribed bictegravir as BIC/TAF/FTC or dolutegravir as dolutegravir/lamivudine and had taken ≥1 dose of study medication. Major outcomes were discontinuations either for any reason or due to toxicity. Incidence was calculated as number of episodes per 100 person-years adjusted through propensity score analysis. RESULTS: Relative to persons treated with BIC/TAF/FTC (n = 1231), persons treated with dolutegravir/lamivudine (n = 821) were older and had more AIDS-defining conditions although better HIV control. After a median follow-up of 52 weeks, adjusted incidence rates for discontinuation were 6.68 (95% CI 5.18-8.19) and 8.44 (95% CI 6.29-10.60) episodes per 100 person-years for BIC/TAF/FTC and dolutegravir/lamivudine, respectively; adjusted incidence rate ratio for dolutegravir/lamivudine was 1.26 (95% CI 0.89-1.78) relative to BIC/TAF/FTC (P = 0.1847). Adjusted incidence rates for discontinuation due to toxicity were 3.88 (95% CI 2.70-5.06) and 4.62 (95% CI 3.05-6.19) episodes per 100 person-years for BIC/TAF/FTC and dolutegravir/lamivudine, respectively; adjusted incidence rate ratio for dolutegravir/lamivudine was 1.19 (95% CI 0.75-1.90) relative to BIC/TAF/FTC (P = 0. 4620). Adverse events leading to discontinuation were neuropsychiatric (n = 42; 2%), followed by gastrointestinal (n = 23; 1%), dermatological (n = 15; 1%) and weight increase (n = 15; 1%), without differences between regimens. CONCLUSIONS: Switching to BIC/TAF/FTC or dolutegravir/lamivudine showed no difference in the risks of overall or toxicity-related discontinuations or in the profile of adverse events leading to discontinuation.

Comparison between the impact of tenofovir alafenamide and that of abacavir on rapid kidney function decline: A retrospective observational study.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the impact of tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) on the slope of the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) with that of abacavir in Japanese patients living with HIV infection. METHODS: The participants in this single-centre, retrospective, observational study were Japanese patients with HIV infection who started antiretroviral therapy with TAF/emtricitabine or abacavir/lamivudine or were switched from tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine to TAF/emtricitabine or abacavir/lamivudine (anchor drugs remained constant) between January 2012 and December 2020. The eGFR slope was defined as the regression coefficient between eGFR and time. The study outcome was rapid kidney function decline (RKFD; eGFR slope < -5 mL/min/1.73 m2 /year). The adjusted effect of TAF on the eGFR slope was compared with that of abacavir using multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The study included 184 patients (with 2835 eGFR data points). The median duration of exposure to TAF or abacavir was 2.6 years [interquartile range (IQR): 1.7-3.3], and the median eGFR slope was -4.1 mL/min/1.73 m2 /year (IQR: -6.4 to -1.2). In all, 72 patients (39%) experienced RKFD. Patients receiving TAF were more likely to experience RKFD (adjusted odds ratio = 3.74) than those receiving abacavir. There was a significant independent association between baseline eGFR and RKFD. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that renal function should be monitored carefully after the initiation of TAF in Japanese patients with HIV infection.

Efficacy and tolerability of dolutegravir/lamivudine versus dolutegravir/rilpivirine in switching from a three-drug regimen based on nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors: A retrospective cohort study.

Real-life comparisons of dolutegravir/rilpivirine (DTG/RPV) and DTG/lamivudine (3TC) regimens in people living with human immunodeficiency virus (PLWHIV) who switched from a standard three-drug regimen based on nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) are missing. This study aimed to compare DTG/3TC and DTG/RPV in virologically suppressed patients (HIV-RNA < 50 copies/mL) coming from any NNRTI-based regimen in terms of discontinuation due to virologic failure (VF) discontinuation rates due to all causes, and adverse events. As a secondary outcome, we evaluated the difference in creatinine, total cholesterol, CD4, and triglycerides from baseline to weeks 48 after the switch. Of the 415 PLWHs included in the study, 278 (66.9%) switched to DTG/3TC, and 137 (33.1%) switched to DTG/RPV. Overall, 48 PLWHs (11.6%) discontinued the treatment:38 with DTG/3TC and 10 with DTG/RPV with similar discontinuation rates: 5.01 × 100 py (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.64-6.94) and 4.66 × 100 py (95% CI 2.51-8.67), respectively. The most common reason for discontinuation was toxicity (26 patients, 22/278 [7.9%] in the DTG/3TC group and 4/137 [2.9%] in the DTG/RPV group), mainly neurologic toxicity (never above grade 2). We found no differences in discontinuation rates due to treatment adverse events. Two study participants experienced virological failure in the DTG/3TC arm. We observed no significant difference in CD4 cell counts, lipid parameters, or renal function between the two groups at 48 weeks. This study demonstrated that, in clinical practice, a two-drug regimen with DTG/3TC or DTG/RPV is characterized by a low discontinuation rate and VF in virologically suppressed PLWHs switched from an NNRTI-based three antiretroviral drugs regimen.

An indirect comparison of 144-week efficacy, safety, and tolerability of dolutegravir plus lamivudine and second-generation integrase inhibitor-based, 3-drug, single-tablet regimens in therapy-naive people with HIV-1.

BACKGROUND: The long-term efficacy and safety of the 2-drug regimen dolutegravir (DTG) + lamivudine (3TC) and 3-drug single-tablet regimens recommended for antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naive people with HIV-1 (PWH) have yet to be compared directly in clinical trials. This indirect treatment comparison (ITC) was conducted to compare the durability of efficacy and long-term safety of DTG + 3TC vs second-generation, integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI)-based, 3-drug, single-tablet regimens bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (BIC/FTC/TAF) and DTG/abacavir/3TC (DTG/ABC/3TC) at Week 144 after treatment initiation. METHODS: A systematic literature review identified 4 trials evaluating the treatment regimens of interest in ART-naive PWH (GEMINI-1, GEMINI-2, GS-US-380-1489, and GS-US-380-1490). Safety, efficacy, and tolerability results were compared using fixed-effects Bucher ITC methodology to calculate relative outcomes. RESULTS: Rates of virologic suppression (HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL, US Food and Drug Administration Snapshot analysis) and virologic failure (HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies/mL) as well as mean change in CD4 + cell count were similar with DTG + 3TC, BIC/FTC/TAF, and DTG/ABC/3TC at Week 144. Serious adverse events occurred less frequently with DTG + 3TC compared with both BIC/FTC/TAF (odds ratio [OR], 0.51; 95% CI 0.29-0.87; P = 0.014) and DTG/ABC/3TC (OR, 0.38; 95% CI 0.19-0.75; P = 0.006). Discontinuations and overall adverse events were similar across all 3 regimens. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the 2-drug regimen DTG + 3TC offers comparable and durable efficacy with fewer serious adverse events vs BIC/FTC/TAF and DTG/ABC/3TC through 144 weeks of treatment in ART-naive PWH. These long-term comparative data support the therapeutic value of DTG + 3TC for PWH.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of antiretroviral drugs for treatment-naive HIV infection in China.

INTRODUCTION: Dolutegravir (DTG)-based regimen was included in the expanded formulary of China's National Free Antiretroviral Treatment Program at the end of 2021. Yet high price of DTG and lack of health economic evaluation in China present barriers for implementation of the regimen. The study aims to investigate the lifetime cost-effectiveness of DTG-based regimen for treatment-naive HIV infection in China. METHODS: A decision-analytic Markov model was used to obtain the costs and effectiveness of four regimens: Arm A, efavirenz (EFV)-based regimen; Arm B, DTG-based regimen; Arm C, elvitegravir/cobicistat/tenofovir alafenamide/emtricitabine (EVG/c/FTC/TAF) regimen; Arm D, abacavir/lamivudine/dolutegravir (ABC/3TC/DTG) regimen. The potential impact of national centralized drug procurement policy was assessed in scenario analysis. The results were further validated through sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: Compared with other three regimens, DTG-based regimen led to the fewest cumulative adverse reactions, opportunistic infections and deaths. Compared with EFV-based regimen, the base-case ICERs for DTG-based regimen were 13,357 (USD/QALY) and 13,424 (USD/QALY) from the healthcare system and societal perspective respectively. In the policy scenario analysis with the procurement price of DTG equal to that of LPV/r, DTG-based regimen would be dominant. The model results remained robust in sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: DTG-based regimen for treatment-naive patients is likely to be cost-effective and deserve wider implementation in China. This study strongly suggests the centralized procurement of DTG to minimize cost and maximize cost-effectiveness.

Meta-Analysis of the Risk for Abnormal Liver Function in Pregnancy with High HBV DNA After Antiviral Therapy Withdrawal.

Objective: We aimed to explore the relationship between the withdrawal of antiviral therapy after delivery and the risk for abnormal liver function (ALF) after delivery in pregnant women with high hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA load by meta-analysis, in order to provide the corresponding theoretical basis for further guiding the clinical use of antiviral drugs in such pregnant women. Methods: We searched multiple databases for controlled studies that enrolled pregnant women with chronic HBV infection treated with antiviral therapy from January 1, 2010 to November 1, 2020. Study selection and data extraction were performed by pairs of independent reviewers. The main index was the percentage of ALF higher than the upper limit of normal at 0 to 12 and 12 to 24 weeks after delivery. Meta-analysis was used to compare the risk for ALF after stopping antiviral drugs at different time points following delivery, and subgroup analysis was conducted according to the types of drugs used. Results: We included 10 studies that enrolled 1080 pregnant women. There were 749 pregnant women in the treatment group and 331 pregnant women in the control group (who were not treated with antiviral therapy). The risk ratio (RR) for ALF in the 2 groups at 0 to 12 weeks after delivery: RR = 0.88; 95% CI, 0.71-1.09; at 12-24 weeks: RR = 0.46; 95% CI, 0.29-0.73, were compared. According to the different types of medication, subgroup analysis showed that the lamivudine treatment group compared with the control group at 0-12 weeks: RR = 0.67; 95% CI, 0.26-1.75; at 12-24 weeks, RR = 0.27; 95% CI, 0.11-0.67. The telbivudine treatment group was compared with the control group: at 0-12 weeks: RR = 0.77; 95% CI, 0.43-1.39; at 12-24 weeks: RR = 0.62, 95% CI, 0.23-1.64. The tenofovir treatment group was compared with the control group: at 0-12 weeks RR = 1.02; 95% CI, 0.67-1.55; at 12-24 weeks RR = 0.5; 95% CI, 0.25, 0.99. The lamivudine antiviral treatment group was further analyzed according to different treatment withdrawal time points. Compared with the control group, the immediate withdrawal of lamivudine in labor group at 0-12 weeks RR = 0.29; 95% CI, 0.11-0.77; at 12-24 weeks RR = 0.22; 95% CI, 0.05-0.88; the results were significantly different. There was no significant difference between the 4-week group and the 4-12 week group and the control group. Conclusion: In pregnant women with a high HBV DNA load, immediate withdrawal after antiviral treatment in the second or third trimester of pregnancy did not increase the risk for ALF after delivery.

Efficacy and Tolerability of Tenofovir/Lamivudine/Dolutegravir among Antiretroviral Therapy Naive Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infected Patients of a Tertiary Care Center in Eastern India.

BACKGROUND: Although many drug regimens have been used in the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, the National AIDS Control Organization (NACO) of India recommends the use of a fixed-dose combination of tenofovir/lamivudine/dolutegravir (TLD) as a first-line regimen since 2020. In spite of much global data on the use of this combination, experience in the Indian population is still limited. We aim to find out the efficacy and tolerability of this novel regimen, in a tertiary care center of Eastern India. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A descriptive observational study, longitudinal in design performed in the antiretroviral therapy (ART) center of a tertiary care hospital in Kolkata, West Bengal, India. All patients who attended the ART center from April 2021 to October 2022 were enrolled in the study following inclusion and exclusion criteria. A detailed history, clinical examination, necessary biochemical tests, and CD4 count of all patients were done at baseline. Subsequently, they were followed up for 6 months with monthly visits when they were enquired about any adverse effects requiring therapy interruptions. At the end of 6 months, CD4 count and viral load were measured. RESULTS: Out of a total sample of 249 patients, the TLD regimen was efficacious in 99.2% (n = 247) in whom viral load was suppressed to <1,000 copies/mL after 6 months of treatment. The regimen had to be temporarily discontinued in 6% of patients (n = 15). The most common cause of treatment interruption was hepatic dysfunction (3.2%) followed by cutaneous manifestation (2.4%). In 14 out of 15 patients, the regimen could be reintroduced and was safely tolerated afterward. Only one patient had to be shifted to an alternative regimen due to tenofovir-induced nephrotoxicity. Thus TLD was tolerated in 99.6% (n = 248) patients. CONCLUSION: The fixed-dose combination of TLD is a highly efficacious and well-tolerated first-line regimen for ART naïve patients with HIV infection having >95% adherence. How to cite this article: Sengupta D, Ghosh S, Pain S, et al. Efficacy and Tolerability of Tenofovir/Lamivudine/Dolutegravir among Antiretroviral Therapy Naive Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infected Patients of a Tertiary Care Center in Eastern India. J Assoc Physicians India 2023;71(9):72-74.

Efficacy and Safety of Switching to Dolutegravir/Lamivudine Versus Continuing a Tenofovir Alafenamide-Based 3- or 4-Drug Regimen for Maintenance of Virologic Suppression in Adults Living With Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1: Results Through Week 144 From the Phase 3, Noninferiority TANGO Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: Switching to dolutegravir/lamivudine (DTG/3TC) was noninferior to continuing tenofovir alafenamide (TAF)-based regimens for maintaining virologic suppression at week 48 of the TANGO study. Here we present week 144 outcomes (efficacy, safety, weight, and biomarkers). METHODS: TANGO is a randomized (1:1, stratified by baseline third agent class), open-label, noninferiority phase 3 study. Virologically suppressed (>6 months) adults with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) switched to once-daily DTG/3TC or continued TAF-based regimens. RESULTS: A total of 741 participants received study treatment (DTG/3TC, n = 369; TAF-based regimen, n = 372). At week 144, the proportion of participants with an HIV-1 RNA level ≥50 copies/mL (primary end point, Snapshot; intention-to-treat-exposed population) after switching to DTG/3TC was 0.3% (1 of 369) versus 1.3% (5 of 372) for those continuing TAF-based regimens, demonstrating noninferiority (adjusted treatment difference, -1.1 [95% confidence interval, -2.4 to .2), with DTG/3TC favored in the per-protocol analysis (adjusted treatment difference, -1.1 [-2.3 to -.0]; P = .04). Few participants met confirmed virologic withdrawal criteria (none in the DTG/3TC and 3 in the TAF-based regimen group), with no resistance observed. Drug-related adverse events were more frequent with DTG/3TC (15%; leading to discontinuation in 4%) than TAF-based regimens (5%; leading to discontinuation in 1%) through week 144, but rates were comparable after week 48 (4%; leading to discontinuation in 1% in both groups). Changes from baseline in lipid values generally favored DTG/3TC; no clinical impact on renal function and comparable changes in inflammatory and bone biomarkers across groups were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Switching to DTG/3TC demonstrated noninferior and durable efficacy compared with continuing TAF-based regimens in treatment-experienced adults with HIV-1, with good safety and tolerability, and no resistance through 144 weeks.

Virological outcomes with dolutegravir plus either lamivudine or two NRTIs as switch strategies: a multi-cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of dolutegravir plus lamivudine dual therapy (DT) with that of dolutegravir plus two NRTIs triple therapy (TT) as switch strategies. METHODS: A multicentre cohort of HIV-positive, HBsAg-negative patients with viral suppression (HIV-RNA ≤50 copies/mL) switching to DT or TT was retrospectively selected from the ARCA database. The effect of DT versus TT on virological failure (VF; defined as two consecutive HIV-RNA values >50 copies/mL or one HIV-RNA value ≥200 copies/mL) was evaluated by multivariable Cox regression models, overall and after stratifying for the presence of NRTI resistance-associated mutations (RAMs). RESULTS: From December 2014 to June 2020, 628 patients were eligible: 118 (18.8%) started tenofovir/emtricitabine/dolutegravir, 306 (48.7%) abacavir/lamivudine/dolutegravir and 204 (32.5%) lamivudine/dolutegravir. The DT group had significantly higher nadir and baseline CD4 counts, a higher duration of viral suppression and a lower prevalence of RAMs at historical genotype. Overall, 41 VF occurred after a median of 1.7 years of follow-up, with a lower, but not statistically significant, rate for DT [versus TT, adjusted HR (aHR) = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.25-1.34]. However, DT was associated with less VF in the absence of RAMs when compared with tenofovir-based TT (aHR = 0.20, 95% CI = 0.06-0.67), but not with abacavir-based TT (aHR = 0.43, 95% CI = 0.17-1.11). Conversely, in the setting of pre-existing M184V/I, DT showed a trend to increased risk of VF (versus tenofovir-based TT, aHR = 137.50, 95% CI = 4.24-4464.06; versus abacavir-based TT, aHR = 33.88, 95% CI = 1.75-656.47). CONCLUSIONS: Lamivudine/dolutegravir maintenance DT showed similar efficacy to dolutegravir-based TT; however, past M184V/I may favour VF.

Analysing the efficacy and tolerability of dolutegravir plus either rilpivirine or lamivudine in a multicentre cohort of virologically suppressed PLWHIV.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate and compare the efficacy and safety of two dolutegravir-based two-drug regimens: dolutegravir + lamivudine versus dolutegravir + rilpivirine. METHODS: We analysed a cohort of people living with HIV (PLWHIV) switching to dolutegravir + lamivudine or dolutegravir + rilpivirine. We excluded from the analysis PLWHIV with no available pre-switch genotypic test or with a known resistance mutation to one of the study drugs. We evaluated incidence of virological failure (VF) and treatment discontinuation (TD), as well as changes in immunological and metabolic parameters. RESULTS: We enrolled 592 PLWHIV: 306 in the lamivudine group and 286 in the rilpivirine group. We observed nine VFs in the lamivudine group [1.4 VF per 100 patient-years of follow-up (PYFU)] and four VFs in the rilpivirine group (0.6 VF per 100 PYFU). Subsequent genotypic analysis showed no acquired resistance-associated mutations in those experiencing VF. Estimated probability of maintaining virological suppression at 144 and 240 weeks were 96.6% and 92.7%, respectively, in the lamivudine group and 98.7% and 98.7%, respectively, in the rilpivirine group (log-rank P = 0.172). The estimated probability of maintaining study regimen at Week 240 was 82.3% in the lamivudine group and 85.9% in the rilpivirine group (log-rank P = 0.018). We observed a significant improvement in CD4+ cell count at Week 240 in the lamivudine group (P = 0.012); in the rilpivirine group we registered a significant increase in CD4/CD8 ratio (P = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: Both analysed strategies are effective and safe as switch strategies in clinical practice, with a low incidence of VF and a favourable immunological recovery, even in the long term.

Risk factors of severe hepatotoxicity among HIV-1 infected individuals initiated on highly active antiretroviral therapy in the Northwest Region of Cameroon.

BACKGROUND: Hepatotoxicity due to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has gained prominent attention since it can be affected by many factors. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of hepatotoxicity and related risk factors of severe hepatotoxicity following HAART initiation. METHODS: A total of 100 drug-naive patients aged between 18 and 61 years were recruited. They were put on Tenofovir/Lamivudine/Efavirenz [TDF/3TC/EFV] (64), Zidovudine/ Lamivudine/Efavirenz [AZT/3TC/EFV] (22), and Zidovudine/Lamivudine/Nevirapine AZT/3TC/NVP (14) and monitored for 6months and blood samples drawn.Alanine aminotransferases (ALT), aspartate aminotransferases (AST), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) wereanalyzed by enzymatic methods and used to classify levels of hepatotoxicity. RESULTS: A total of 37(37%) and 49(49%) patients presented with hepatotoxicity while 15% and 28% had severe hepatotoxicity at 4 and 24 weeks respectively. Serum levels of all enzymes increased significantly (p = 0.001) with increased treatment duration. Univariate analysis revealed that the risk factor of developing severe hepatotoxicity was significantly greater in patients < 30years (p = 0.02), males(p = 0.04), low BMI (p = 0.02), low monthly income (p = 0.01) earners, and patients on AZT + 3TC + NVP regimen (p = 0.01). While multivariate analysis at p < 0.09 showed that age 30-40 years, low BMI, low monthly income, and the use of AZT + 3TC + NVP regimen were independent risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Low BMI, age group of 30-40years, low monthly income, and the use of AZT + 3TC + NVP regimen identified as risk factors for the development of severe hepatotoxicity should be considered as an important strategy by clinicians in preventing the hepatotoxicity.

Long-term outcome of lamivudine/dolutegravir dual therapy in HIV-infected, virologically suppressed patients.

BACKGROUND: The use of DTG-containing two-drug regimens is one of the most promising solutions to the need to ease the management of HIV treatment without harming its efficacy and safety. We report long- term results in patients switched, while virologically suppressed, to the combination of dolutegravir (DTG) plus lamivudine (3TC). METHODS: This is a prospective, clinical, uncontrolled cohort enrolling ART-experienced people living with HIV (PLWH) with HIV-RNA < 50 copies/ml for 6 months or longer, negative hepatitis B virus surface antigen, and without known M184V/I mutations. Kaplan-Meiers curves are used to describe persistency of virological suppression on therapy and a Cox regression model to evaluate baseline characteristics and the risk of stopping therapy. RESULTS: 218 individuals switched their regimen since 2015. The mean estimated follow-up was of 64.3 months (95% CI 61.3-67.3) for approximately 1000 patient/years. After 5 years of follow-up, 77.1% were still on the DTG-3TC combination. No virologic failure was detected throughout the whole study period, and only 15 subjects presented single isolated viral blips above 50 copies/ml. Most patients stopped therapy because of reasons unrelated to study drugs (lost to follow-up; patients' decision; moved to other Centers), but due to the unselected nature of the casuistry; 11 subjects died in the 5 years of follow-up mostly because of pre-existing co-morbidities (6 neoplastic diseases and 2 end-stage liver disease). The median baseline CD4 count was 669 cells/mcl (IQR 483-927). After 5 years it raised to 899 cells/mcl (IQR 646-1160) (P < 0.001) without a significant change of CD8 counts that lowered from 767 cells/mcl (IQR 532-1034) to 683 cells/mcl (IQR 538-988). Consequently, the CD4/CD8 ratio varied from 0.93 (IQR 0.60-1.30) to 1.15 (IQR 0.77-1.45) (P < 0.0001). A non-significant (P = 0.320) increment of mean creatinine, 0.06 mg/dl in magnitude, was observed over the whole follow-up. CONCLUSION: These long-term results over 5 years reinforce the durability and good tolerability of DTG-3TC. Our results continue to support the recommended switch use of this 2DR as a well-accepted treatment option for ART-experienced PLWH.