Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Biomed Chromatogr ; 28(6): 895-900, 2014 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24861761

ABSTRACT

A dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction method based on solidification of floating organic drop combined with HPLC was developed for the determination of lovastatin and simvastatin in rat urine for the first time. 1-Dodecanol and methanol were used as the extraction and disperser solvents, respectively. Several important parameters influencing the micro-extraction efficiency were studied and systematically optimized, including the type and volume of extraction solvent and disperser solvent, extraction time, pH and salt concentration. The analytes were separated on a Kromasil C18 column at 30°C with a mobile phase of methanol and 0.2% acetic acid in water (83:17, v/v) and detected at 238 nm. Under the optimal conditions, the maximum number of enrichment factors for both analytes was 27. The linear ranges were 20.08-1004 and 20.00-1000 µg/L with the correlation coefficients ranging from 0.9990 to 0.9994 for lovastatin and simvastatin, respectively. The volume of organic solvent consumed in extraction was <0.3 mL, and the extraction time was 10 min. The newly developed environment-friendly sample pretreatment method will be a good alternative to conventional techniques, such as solid-phase extraction, liquid-liquid extraction and protein precipitation, for the HPLC determination of lovastatin and simvastatin in biological samples.


Subject(s)
Anticholesteremic Agents/isolation & purification , Anticholesteremic Agents/urine , Liquid Phase Microextraction/methods , Lovastatin/isolation & purification , Lovastatin/urine , Simvastatin/isolation & purification , Simvastatin/urine , Animals , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid , Rats
2.
Anal Bioanal Chem ; 387(8): 2719-25, 2007 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17333149

ABSTRACT

A simple, sensitive, and useful concentration method for lovastatin (Lvt) in urine has been developed based on the transient moving chemical reaction boundary method (tMCRBM) in capillary electrophoresis. The MCRB is formed with acidic sample buffer (Gly-HCl) and alkaline running buffer (Gly-NaOH). The following optimal conditions were determined for stacking and separation: electrophoretic buffer of 100 mM Gly- NaOH (pH 11.52), sample buffer of 20 mM Gly-HCl (pH 4.93), fused-silica capillary of 76 cm x 75-microm i.d (67 cm from detector), sample injection at 14 mbar for 3 min. A 21- to 26-fold increase in peak height was achieved for detection of Lvt in urine under the optimal conditions compared with normal capillary zone electrophoresis. By combining the sample pretreatment procedure with the stacking method, the sensitivity of Lvt in urine was increased by 105- to 130-fold. The limits of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ) for Lvt in urine were decreased to 8.8 ng/mL and 29.2 ng/mL, respectively. The intra-day and inter-day precision values (expressed as RSD) were 2.23-3.61% and 4.03-5.05%, respectively. The recoveries of the analyte at three concentration levels changed from 82.65 to 100.49%.


Subject(s)
Anticholesteremic Agents/urine , Electrophoresis, Capillary/methods , Lovastatin/urine , Reference Standards , Spectrophotometry, Ultraviolet
3.
Biopharm Drug Dispos ; 28(6): 297-306, 2007 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17571283

ABSTRACT

Lovastatin and extended-release (ER) niacin in a fixed dose combination (Advicor) is approved for the treatment of dyslipidemia. Since both drugs are extensively metabolized, this study investigated the bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of their co-administration following single-dose administration. In a 4-way crossover study 40 subjects received: two 1000/20 Advicor tablets (ADV), two 1000 mg niacin ER tablets (NSP), two 20mg lovastatin tablets (Mevacor; MEV), and two niacin ER 1000 mg tablets with two lovastatin 20mg tablets (NSP+MEV). Plasma was assayed for niacin, nicotinuric acid (NUA), lovastatin, lovastatin acid and HMGCoA reductase inhibition. Urine was assayed for niacin and its metabolites, NUA, N-methylnicotinamide and N-methyl-2pyridone-5-carboxamide. Least square mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals for C(max) and AUC((0-t)) were determined for NSP+MEV versus MEV or NSP, ADV versus MEV or NSP, and ADV versus NSP+MEV. Co-administration of niacin and lovastatin did not significantly influence C(max) and AUC((0-t)) of lovastatin, niacin, NUA and total urinary recovery of niacin and metabolites. A 22 to 25% decrease in lovastatin acid C(max) was observed while lovastatin acid AUC((0-t)) was not affected. The HMGCoA reductase inhibition C(max) and AUC((0-t)) were not affected indicating that the difference in lovastatin acid C(max) was not clinically relevant.


Subject(s)
Delayed-Action Preparations/pharmacokinetics , Lovastatin/pharmacokinetics , Niacin/pharmacokinetics , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Agents/metabolism , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Area Under Curve , Biological Availability , Cross-Over Studies , Delayed-Action Preparations/adverse effects , Drug Combinations , Female , Flushing/chemically induced , Humans , Lovastatin/blood , Lovastatin/urine , Male , Metabolic Clearance Rate , Middle Aged , Nausea/chemically induced , Niacin/blood , Niacin/urine , Niacinamide/analogs & derivatives , Niacinamide/metabolism , Nicotinic Acids/metabolism , Pyridones/urine , Tablets , Time Factors , Vitamin B Complex/blood , Vitamin B Complex/pharmacokinetics , Vitamin B Complex/urine
4.
Drug Metab Dispos ; 22(1): 139-42, 1994.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8149872

ABSTRACT

A study to investigate the disposition and biliary excretion of simvastatin (SV) was conducted in four cholecystectomy patients with T-tube drainage. Each patient received a single oral dose of 100 mg of [14C]SV (20 microCi). Of the 14C-labeled dose, approximately 35% was excreted in urine, 25% in bile, and 20% in feces. Thus, at least 60% of the oral dose was absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract. Of the AUC for radioactivity in plasma, 13% was contributed by the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. In addition, only 2% of the 14C-dose was eliminated in urine as HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. Thus, most of the SV-related compounds in plasma and urine have little or no HMG-CoA reductase inhibitory activity. The same is probably true for these compounds in bile. Two major active metabolites were present in the bile. Based on HPLC and MS/MS data, they were identified as 6' beta-COOH-SVA and 6'-OH-SVA. In general, the majority of the radioactivity in the bile and urine was excreted within 24 hr postdose. Of the radioactivity excreted in the 0- to 24-hr bile, on average, approximately 30% was contributed by 6' beta-COOH-SVA and 6'-OH-SVA. These two metabolites accounted for the majority of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitory activity in the bile. Little or SV or no SVA was present in the bile.


Subject(s)
Lovastatin/analogs & derivatives , Adult , Aged , Bile/chemistry , Cholecystectomy , Drainage , Feces/chemistry , Humans , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors , Lovastatin/administration & dosage , Lovastatin/pharmacokinetics , Lovastatin/urine , Middle Aged , Simvastatin , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL