Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 25
Filter
1.
Gynecol Oncol ; 149(2): 324-328, 2018 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29555331

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Low social support is associated with worse prognosis for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients. However, few studies have explored the relation between low social support and incidence of EOC. The aim of this prospective nested case-control study was to examine whether self-perceived low social support was associated with the incidence of EOC. METHODS: The Swedish Cancer Registry was used to identify participants in the Västerbotten Intervention Programme (VIP) comprising 58,000 women, who later developed EOC. Each case was matched to four cancer free controls. The VIP uses the Social Support questionnaire, a modified version of the validated questionnaire "The Interview Schedule for Social Interaction" (ISSI) measuring quantitative (AVSI) and qualitative (AVAT) aspects of social support. RESULTS: The risk of EOC in relation to AVSI and AVAT was similar between the 239 cases and the 941 controls after adjustment for educational level, smoking, BMI, Cambridge Physical Activity Index and age (aOR 0.85, 95% CI 0.72-1.01 and aOR 0.54, 95% CI 0.16-1.81). Lagtime was found to have no impact. A decreased risk of serous ovarian cancer was seen in women with fewer persons available for informal socializing (aOR 0.75, 95% CI 0.59-0.95). Adjusted analyses showed non-significant odds ratios below 1.0 in the vast majority of histotypes. CONCLUSIONS: A general trend towards a decreased risk of ovarian cancer associated with low AVSI and AVAT was identified. Solely the serous subtype was significantly associated with low scores of AVSI. Prospective pathophysiological and epidemiological studies regarding social support are needed.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/epidemiology , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/psychology , Ovarian Neoplasms/epidemiology , Ovarian Neoplasms/psychology , Social Support , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial , Case-Control Studies , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Incidence , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/pathology , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Registries , Risk Factors , Sweden/epidemiology
2.
Gynecol Oncol ; 146(1): 101-108, 2017 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28527672

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Long-term survival of women with advanced-stage ovarian cancer is relatively rare. Little is known about quality of life (QOL) and survivorship concerns of these women. Here, we describe QOL of women with advanced-stage ovarian cancer surviving for 8.5 years or longer and compare women with 0-1 recurrence to those with multiple recurrences. METHODS: Participants (n=56) recruited from 5 academic medical centers and the Ovarian Cancer Research Fund Alliance completed surveys regarding QOL (FACT-O), mood (CESD), social support (SPS), physical activity (IPAQ-SF), diet, and clinical characteristics. Median survival was 14.0 years (range 8.8-33.3). RESULTS: QOL and psychological adjustment of long-term survivors was relatively good, with mean FACT-G scores (multiple recurrences: 80.81±13.95; 0-1 recurrence: 89.05 ±10.80) above norms for healthy community samples (80.1±18.1). Survivors with multiple recurrences reported more compromised QOL in domains of physical and emotional well-being (p <.05), and endorsed a variety of physical and emotional concerns compared to survivors with 0-1 recurrence. Difficulties in sexual functioning were common in both groups. Almost half (43%) of the survivors reported low levels of physical activity. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, women with advanced-stage ovarian cancer who have survived at least 8.5 years report good QOL and psychological adjustment. QOL of survivors with multiple recurrences is somewhat impaired compared to those with 0-1 recurrence. Limitations include a possible bias towards participation by healthier survivors, thus under-representing the level of compromise in long-term survivors. Health care practitioners should be alert to psychosocial issues faced by these long-term survivors to provide interventions that enhance QOL.


Subject(s)
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/psychology , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/pathology , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/psychology , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Ovarian Neoplasms/psychology , Aged , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial , Cross-Sectional Studies , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Life Style , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Psychometrics , Quality of Life , Social Support , Survivors
3.
Gynecol Oncol ; 147(1): 98-103, 2017 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28743369

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate association between baseline quality of life (QOL) and changes in QOL measured by FACT-O TOI with progression-free disease (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). METHODS: Patients enrolled in GOG-0218 with completed FACT-O TOI assessments at baseline and at least one follow-up assessment were eligible. Baseline FACT-O TOI scores were sorted by quartiles (Q1-4) and outcomes compared between Q1 and Q2-4 with log-rank statistic and multivariate Cox regression adjusting for age, stage, post-surgical residual disease size, and performance status (PS). Trends in FACT-O TOI scores from baseline to the latest follow-up assessment were evaluated for impact on intragroup (Q1 or Q2-4) outcome by log-rank analysis. RESULTS: Of 1152 eligible patients, 283 formed Q1 and 869 formed Q2-4. Mean baseline FACT-O TOI scores were 47.5 for Q1 vs. 74.7 for Q2-4 (P<0.001). Q1 compared to Q2-4 had worse median OS (37.5 vs. 45.6months, P=0.001) and worse median PFS (12.5 vs. 13.1months, P=0.096). Q2-4 patients had decreased risks of disease progression (HR 0.974, 95% CI 0.953-0.995, P=0.018), and death (HR 0.963, 95% CI 0.939-0.987, P=0.003) for each five-point increase in baseline FACT-O TOI. Improving versus worsening trends in FACT-O TOI scores were associated with longer median PFS (Q1: 12.7 vs. 8.6months, P=0.001; Q2-4: 16.7 vs. 11.1months, P<0.001) and median OS (Q1: 40.8 vs. 16months, P<0.001; Q2-4: 54.4 vs. 33.6months, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Baseline FACT-O TOI scores were independently prognostic of PFS and OS while improving compared to worsening QOL was associated with significantly better PFS and OS in women with EOC.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/psychology , Ovarian Neoplasms/psychology , Quality of Life , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/mortality , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/pathology , Ovarian Neoplasms/mortality , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Predictive Value of Tests , Prognosis , Regression Analysis , Survival Analysis
4.
Gynecol Oncol ; 144(2): 348-353, 2017 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27988047

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) has been found to be associated with overall survival in women with ovarian cancer. However, previous studies assessed HRQOL after surgery within clinical trial populations only. The study goal was to determine the association of pre-cancer diagnosis HRQOL with the likelihood of receiving surgery and with overall survival in a national, population-based cohort of older women with advanced ovarian cancer. METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare Health Outcomes Survey (MHOS) database was queried to identify 374 women aged 65years and older with advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer from 1998 to 2011. Responses to the Short Form 36 (SF-36) and Veterans-RAND-12 (VR-12), two single-item global health questions, and Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) were abstracted. Multivariable models were used to quantify associations of HRQOL and ADL assessments with surgery and overall survival, adjusted for demographic and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: Of 374 women with a HRQOL assessment prior to diagnosis, 199 (53%) underwent surgery. Increases in physical and mental HRQOL domains were significantly associated with receipt of surgery. The relationship between HRQOL domains and overall survival were not statistically significant. For ADLs, only difficulty in toilet use was significantly associated with survival. CONCLUSION: In this population-based sample of older women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer, pre-diagnosis HRQOL was predictive of receiving surgery, but not of overall survival.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/surgery , Ovarian Neoplasms/surgery , Quality of Life , Activities of Daily Living , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , Medicare , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/mortality , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/psychology , Ovarian Neoplasms/mortality , Ovarian Neoplasms/psychology , SEER Program , United States
5.
Psychooncology ; 26(11): 1799-1809, 2017 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27421919

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Fear of cancer recurrence is an important clinical phenomenon and is associated with decrements in life domains. The study goals were to characterize patterns of global fear of recurrence (FOR) and 4 domains of fear (health, role, womanhood, and death worry) over time in women who were diagnosed with gynecological cancer and to identify demographic, medical, and psychological predictors of FOR. METHOD: One hundred eighteen women participating in the usual care arm of a randomized trial completed the Concerns about Recurrence scale as well as measures of depressive symptoms, cancer-specific distress, coping, coping efficacy, and social network responses at 4 time points. The majority of the sample was diagnosed with stage 3 ovarian cancer. RESULTS: Group-based trajectory modeling identified subgroups of women with high-stable (49.1%), high-decreasing (25.3%), and low-stable (25.5%) trajectories for global FOR. For role worries, 3 similar group trajectories were identified. For health worries, modeling identified subgroups with high-decreasing (19.1%) and low-increasing (80.9%) trajectories. For womanhood worries, modeling identified subgroups with high-increasing (15.7%) and low-decreasing (84.2%) trajectories. Young age, metastatic cancer, depression, cancer distress, holding back, and lower coping efficacy were associated with the high-stable global FOR and at least 1 domain of FOR. CONCLUSION: Almost half of the women recently diagnosed with gynecological cancer evidence persistently elevated FOR over the 6-month period postdiagnosis. Psychological interventions to reduce FOR may be more effective if they focus on teaching patients coping skills, as well as greater comfort expressing cancer-specific concerns to others.


Subject(s)
Adaptation, Psychological , Anxiety/psychology , Depression/psychology , Fear/psychology , Genital Neoplasms, Female/diagnosis , Genital Neoplasms, Female/psychology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/psychology , Adult , Aged , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial , Depressive Disorder/psychology , Female , Genital Neoplasms, Female/pathology , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/diagnosis , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/pathology , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/psychology , Ovarian Neoplasms/diagnosis , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Ovarian Neoplasms/psychology , Quality of Life , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Social Support , Time
6.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 294(1): 123-9, 2016 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26498757

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of patients with non-platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer is poor. There is a need for salvage therapies with anti-tumor activity and acceptable toxicity for maintaining quality of life. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD, Caelyx(®)) is a promising drug fulfilling these demands. We present retrospective data of patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) who were treated with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin at the University of Heidelberg between 2007 and 2009. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients for this retrospective study had advanced ovarian cancer and were treated in a palliative setting with PLD at the university hospital of Heidelberg, Germany. Primary objectives were toxicity and efficacy of PLD. 34 patients were included in this study between November 2007 and December 2009; one patient received PLD twice as palliative treatment. RESULTS: The median age of the 34 patients enrolled in this study was 59.9 years (range 27-77 years). The median weight of the patients was 69 kg (range 47-109 kg), the median height 164 cm (range 140-176 cm). Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin was administered every 4 weeks with a dosage of 40 mg/m(2) body surface. PLD was administered for three cycles in median (range 1-9 cycles). Dose reduction was necessary in only four patients. In our study time to progression and overall survival was 8.74 and 14.23 months. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, this retrospective study showed the efficacy and low toxicity of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in patients with advanced EOC. Further observations are needed to confirm these preliminary experiences on a larger number of patients.


Subject(s)
Antibiotics, Antineoplastic/toxicity , Doxorubicin/analogs & derivatives , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/drug therapy , Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy , Quality of Life , Adult , Aged , Antibiotics, Antineoplastic/administration & dosage , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial , Disease Progression , Doxorubicin/administration & dosage , Doxorubicin/toxicity , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Germany , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/pathology , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/psychology , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Ovarian Neoplasms/psychology , Polyethylene Glycols/administration & dosage , Polyethylene Glycols/toxicity , Prognosis , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Salvage Therapy , Treatment Outcome
7.
Cancer ; 121(19): 3543-50, 2015 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26096769

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The impact of psychological well-being on the physiologic processes involved in cancer progression remains unclear. Prior research has implicated adrenergic signaling in tumor growth and metastasis. Given that adrenergic signaling is influenced by both positive and negative factors, the authors examined how 2 different aspects of well-being (eudaimonic and positive affect) and psychological distress were associated with tumor norepinephrine (NE) in patients with ovarian cancer. METHODS: A total of 365 women with suspected ovarian cancer completed psychosocial assessments before surgery and clinical information was obtained from medical records. Study inclusion was confirmed after histological diagnosis. Tumor NE was measured in frozen tissue samples using high-performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to model eudaimonic well-being, positive affect, and psychological distress, and structural equation modeling was used to examine associations between these factors and tumor NE. RESULTS: Eudaimonic well-being, positive affect, and psychological distress, modeled as distinct but correlated constructs, best fit the data (ie, compared with unitary or 2-factor models) (root mean square error of approximation, 0.048; comparative fit index, 0.982; and standardized root-mean-squared residual, 0.035). Structural equation modeling analysis that included physical well-being, stage of disease, histology, psychological treatment history, beta-blocker use, and caffeine use as covariates was found to have good model fit (root mean square error of approximation, 0.052; comparative fit index, 0.955; and standardized root-mean-squared residual, 0.036) and demonstrated that eudaimonic well-being was related to lower tumor NE (ß = -.24 [P = .045]). In contrast, no effects were found for positive affect or psychological distress. CONCLUSIONS: Eudaimonic well-being was found to be associated with lower tumor NE, independent of positive affect and psychological distress. Because adrenergic signaling is implicated in tumor progression, increasing eudaimonic well-being may improve both psychological and physiologic resilience in patients with ovarian cancer.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers/chemistry , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/psychology , Norepinephrine/adverse effects , Ovarian Neoplasms/psychology , Stress, Psychological/complications , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial , Disease Progression , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Social Support , Tumor Microenvironment
8.
Gynecol Oncol ; 139(3): 481-6, 2015 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26449316

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: While emerging evidence supports a possible link between depression and ovarian cancer progression, no prospective studies have explored the association with ovarian cancer risk. METHODS: We prospectively followed 77,451 women from the Nurses' Health Study (1992-2010) and 106,452 women from the Nurses' Health Study II (1993-2011). Depression was defined as having one or more of the following: a 5-item Mental Health Index (MHI-5) score≤52, antidepressant use, or physician-diagnosed depression. Multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between depression and incident ovarian cancer. RESULTS: We documented 698 incident cases of epithelial ovarian cancer during follow-up. In multivariable analyses, depression assessed 2-4years before cancer diagnosis was associated with a modestly higher incidence of ovarian cancer (HR=1.30, 95% CI 1.05-1.60). Compared to women with persistent negative depression status, the adjusted HRs were 1.34 (95% CI 1.01-1.76) for women with persistent positive depression status and 1.28 (95% CI 0.88-1.85) for women with worsening depression status over follow-up. The association did not appear to vary by ovarian cancer risk factors or tumor characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that depression may be associated with a modestly increased risk of ovarian cancer. Given the relatively high prevalence of depression in women, future work in larger prospective human studies is needed to confirm our results.


Subject(s)
Depression/epidemiology , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/epidemiology , Ovarian Neoplasms/epidemiology , Adult , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial , Depression/drug therapy , Disease Progression , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Health Surveys , Humans , Incidence , Middle Aged , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/psychology , Ovarian Neoplasms/psychology , Proportional Hazards Models , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Time Factors , United States/epidemiology
9.
Gynecol Oncol ; 138(2): 388-93, 2015 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25988961

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate if an individual's locus of control (LOC) predicts various quality of life (QOL) and mental well-being measures. To identify targets that might enhance the overall spiritual well-being and QOL of ovarian cancer patients. METHODS: Multi-site analysis of women with newly diagnosed stages II-IV ovarian, primary peritoneal or fallopian tube cancer. Patients completed the following surveys: Locus of Control Scale (LOC), Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Ovarian (FACT-O), Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual (FACIT-Sp), Edmonton Symptom Assessment score (ESAS), Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS), Templer's Death Anxiety Scale (DAS), and Herth Hope Index (HHI). Regression models were created to examine the effect of LOC upon QOL, symptoms, and other measures of mental well-being. These models adjusted for the effect of site of care, race, and partnership status as potential confounders. RESULTS: This study enrolled 104 patients from three separate treatment facilities. After adjusting for site, race and partnership status, higher levels of external LOC predicted decreased QOL (FACT-O) (p<0.05). Higher levels of external LOC also correlated with increased death anxiety and general anxiety (p≤0.05). Additionally, higher levels of external LOC predicted decreased hope (HHI) (p≤0.01). DISCUSSION: Ovarian cancer patients with a high external LOC may be at risk for decreased QOL at the time of their cancer diagnosis. They may also experience higher levels of anxiety and decreased feelings of hope. Identification of these women and interventions designed to increase a woman's sense of control over her situation may improve QOL and overall mental well-being.


Subject(s)
Anxiety/prevention & control , Anxiety/psychology , Internal-External Control , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/psychology , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/therapy , Ovarian Neoplasms/psychology , Ovarian Neoplasms/therapy , Palliative Care/methods , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/drug therapy , Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy , Palliative Care/psychology , Quality of Life , Surveys and Questionnaires
10.
Support Care Cancer ; 23(4): 1015-23, 2015 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25270849

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate dietary habit changes in patients undergoing chemotherapy for epithelial ovarian cancer. METHODS: Sixty one patients undergoing chemotherapy for epithelial ovarian cancer were enrolled to the study and 44 completed. The dietary intake was evaluated by 7-day food records, and the changes in dietary intake and food-preparing methods were estimated based on a 101-item semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire. Nutritional status was checked with the use of body weight and height, waist and hip circumferences, skinfolds and subjective global assessment tool. Quality of life was measured with the use of EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-OV28. RESULTS: Despite high average body mass index (BMI) (26.7-28.0 kg/m(2)), malnutrition risk was observed in 43.7 and 10.7 % of patients receiving first-line and subsequent-line chemotherapy, respectively (p < 0.001). Dietary intake and quality of life did not differ between the studied groups. A lot of dietary habits changes were observed. Women undergoing subsequent-line chemotherapy consumed more frequently rye bread, pasta, buttermilk, vegetable, fruit, oils, nuts, and juices. Women undergoing first-line chemotherapy consumed more milk, cottage cheese, cream, eggs, fish and seafood, meat offal, salty snacks, and jam. Additionally, women undergoing subsequent-line chemotherapy more often applied cooking in water (p < 0.0001) and baking (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Women undergoing chemotherapy for ovarian cancer change their dietary habits in a pro healthy direction, and these changes are more expressed in patients undergoing subsequent-line chemotherapy.


Subject(s)
Diet/statistics & numerical data , Feeding Behavior , Food Preferences , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/therapy , Ovarian Neoplasms/therapy , Quality of Life/psychology , Adult , Aged , Body Mass Index , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial , Dietary Carbohydrates/administration & dosage , Dietary Fats/administration & dosage , Dietary Fiber/administration & dosage , Dietary Proteins/administration & dosage , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/psychology , Nutritional Status , Ovarian Neoplasms/psychology , Women's Health
11.
Int J Gynecol Cancer ; 25(2): 229-35, 2015 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25594140

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Patients with epithelial ovarian cancer have a poor prognosis and often undergo intensive treatment. These patients are therefore at risk for experiencing distress and reduced quality of life. The aim of this study was to explore the self-reported distress severity, experienced problems, and quality of life in relation to their disease status. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted in 2011 at a University Medical Center. Women with ovarian cancer (n = 273), both during and after treatment, were asked by mail to fill in self-report questionnaires. Distress was measured using with the Distress Thermometer (DT), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and Impact of Event Scale. Problems and quality of life were assessed with the problem list of the DT, and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life C-30 and OV28. RESULTS: The questionnaire data of 104 patients were analyzed. Screening with the DT revealed distress in 32% [mean (SD), 3.1 (2.6)]. Distress was found with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in 14% [8.6 (5.9)] and with the Impact of Event Scale in 18% of the patients [17.5 (15.5)]. No significant differences were found in distress severity and self-reported problems between patients with and without recurrence. In both groups, the problems fatigue, condition, and neuropathy were most reported. Patients with distress (DT ≥ 5) experienced significantly worse functioning, more problems, and lower quality of life than patients without distress (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that disease status in patients with ovarian cancer seems to have no influence on distress, quality of life, and the problems encountered. However, distressed patients experienced more problems, with physical and emotional functioning, and had lower quality of life. The problems fatigue, physical condition, and neuropathy are the most prevailing.


Subject(s)
Anxiety/epidemiology , Depression/epidemiology , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/epidemiology , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/pathology , Ovarian Neoplasms/epidemiology , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Self Report , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anxiety/complications , Anxiety/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depression/complications , Depression/diagnosis , Disease Progression , Emotions/physiology , Fatigue/diagnosis , Fatigue/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Life Change Events , Middle Aged , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/psychology , Ovarian Neoplasms/psychology , Quality of Life/psychology , Sickness Impact Profile , Stress, Psychological/complications , Stress, Psychological/diagnosis , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
12.
Gynecol Oncol ; 132(3): 690-7, 2014 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24423880

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Caregiver burden, quality of life (QOL) and unmet needs are poorly understood, particularly at the end of life. We explored these issues in caregivers of women with ovarian cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Australian Ovarian Cancer Study (AOCS) is a prospective population-based study of women newly diagnosed with primary epithelial ovarian cancer. Ninety-nine caregivers of women participating in the AOCS QOL sub-study (88% response rate) rated their QOL (SF-12), psychological distress (HADS), optimism (LOT), social support (Duke) and unmet needs (SCNS-carers), and patients rated their QOL (FACT-O), every three months for two years. This analysis included measurements in the patient's last year of life. RESULTS: Caregivers had significantly lower mental and physical QOL than population norms (p<0.01). Mean distress (p=0.01) and unmet needs increased over time, however social support remained constant. In linear mixed models, (using scores for each psychosocial variable over time), optimism (p<0.0001), social support (p<0.0001), higher unmet needs (p=0.008), physical wellbeing (p<0.0001), and time to death (p<0.0001) but not patient QOL, predicted caregiver mental well-being and distress. Highest unmet needs in the last 6months related to managing emotions about prognosis, fear of cancer spread, balancing one's own and the patient's needs, impact of caring on work and making decisions in the context of uncertainty. CONCLUSIONS: Aspects of caregiver functioning, rather than patient quality of life, predict caregiver quality of life and distress. Caregivers need help with managing emotions about prognosis, balancing their own and the patient's needs, work, and decision-making when there is uncertainty.


Subject(s)
Caregivers/psychology , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/psychology , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/therapy , Ovarian Neoplasms/psychology , Ovarian Neoplasms/therapy , Terminal Care/psychology , Adult , Aged , Australia , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial , Female , Health Services Needs and Demand , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Needs Assessment , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life
13.
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol ; 35(1): 32-8, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24654458

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF INVESTIGATION: To describe the experience of ovarian cancer patients from symptoms complained before diagnosis until the impact of ovarian cancer diagnosis perceived by women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors used the Psychological General Well being Index (PGWBI) and a semi-structured interview to measure the overall well being of 39 women diagnosed with ovarian cancer in the period 2005-2010 at a secondary care hospital in northern Italy. RESULTS: The PGWBI showed that the majority of the women reported general stress. On the semi-structured interview, 95% of women reported having symptoms and 69% reported a stressful event prior to diagnosis. More than 50% of women reported changes concerning life course. Almost all reported that their primary concerns had to do with the surgical scar, weight gain, and hair loss. CONCLUSIONS: Ovarian cancer diagnosis has a very stressful effect on the quality of life. Early assessment of psychological problems must be an integral part of the therapeutic pathway. Gynaecologists must provide clear and useful information regarding the disease itself as well as regarding correlated symptom relief.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/psychology , Ovarian Neoplasms/psychology , Adult , Aged , Anxiety/etiology , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial , Cohort Studies , Depression/etiology , Fatigue/etiology , Female , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/diagnosis , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/epidemiology , Ovarian Neoplasms/diagnosis , Ovarian Neoplasms/epidemiology , Quality of Life , Surveys and Questionnaires
14.
Cancer ; 119(17): 3234-41, 2013 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23797955

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Sleep disturbance is a common clinical complaint of oncology patients and contributes to substantial morbidity. However, because most sleep studies have been cross-sectional, associations between sleep quality and distress in patients with ovarian cancer over time remain unclear. This prospective longitudinal study examined rates of sleep disturbance; contributions of depression, anxiety, and medication use in sleep disturbance; and associations between sleep quality and quality of life (QOL) during the first year after diagnosis among women with ovarian cancer. METHODS: Women with a pelvic mass completed measures of sleep quality, depression, anxiety, and QOL before surgery. Those diagnosed with primary epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer repeated surveys at 6 months and 1 year after diagnosis. Mixed modeling was used to examine trajectories of psychosocial measures over time, as well as associations between changes in distress and sleep quality. Relationships between changes in sleep and QOL were also examined. RESULTS: The majority of patients reported disturbed global sleep (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index > 5) at all 3 time points. Medications for sleep and pain were associated with worse sleep at all time points. Greater increases in depression were associated with increased disturbances in sleep quality over time (P < .04). Worsening sleep was also associated with declines in QOL over time (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Sleep disturbance is common and persistent in women with ovarian cancer, and is linked to depressive symptoms and QOL. Pharmacologic treatment does not appear to adequately address this problem. Results highlight the need for ongoing screening and intervention for sleep disturbance in this population.


Subject(s)
Anxiety/etiology , Depression/etiology , Ovarian Neoplasms/diagnosis , Ovarian Neoplasms/psychology , Quality of Life , Sleep Wake Disorders/etiology , Stress, Psychological/etiology , Adult , Aged , Analgesics/administration & dosage , Anti-Anxiety Agents/administration & dosage , Antidepressive Agents/administration & dosage , Anxiety/drug therapy , Anxiety/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial , Depression/drug therapy , Depression/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage , Longitudinal Studies , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading , Neoplasm Staging , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/diagnosis , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/psychology , Ovarian Neoplasms/ethnology , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Peritoneal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Peritoneal Neoplasms/psychology , Prospective Studies , Sleep Wake Disorders/drug therapy , Sleep Wake Disorders/epidemiology , Stress, Psychological/drug therapy , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , United States/epidemiology
15.
Oncologist ; 18(11): 1221-8, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24107972

ABSTRACT

Chemotherapy for platinum-resistant/refractory ovarian cancer is motivated by the hope of benefit. We sought to determine the relationships between: (a) trait hope, expectation of symptom benefit from chemotherapy, and anxiety and depression; (b) hope and perceived efficacy of chemotherapy; and (c) unfulfilled hope (where expectations for benefit are not fulfilled) and depression. Methods. Adult patients enrolled within stage 1 of the Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup Symptom Benefit Study were included. Patient. Reported outcomes were collected from 126 women with predominantly platinum-resistant ovarian cancer at baseline, prior to the first four treatment cycles (12-16 weeks), and four weeks after completing chemotherapy or at disease progression, whichever came first. Associations were assessed with Spearman rank correlation coefficient (r) and odds ratio. Results. Trait hope and expectation of symptom benefit from chemotherapy were weakly correlated with each other (r = 0.25). Trait hope, but not expectation of symptom benefit, was negatively correlated with anxiety (r = -0.43) and depression (r = -0.50). The smaller the discrepancy between perceived and expected symptom benefit, the less likely the patient was to have scores indicative of depression (odds ratio: 0.68; 95% confidence interval: 0.49-0.96; p = .026). Conclusion. Trait hope and expectation of symptom benefit from chemotherapy appear to be distinct and independent of the aspects of quality of life and scores for depression. Hope did not appear to affect perceived efficacy of chemotherapy in alleviating symptoms, but women whose expectation of symptom benefit from chemotherapy was not fulfilled were more likely to have scores indicative of depression. It may be preferable to encourage hope toward achievable goals rather than toward benefits from chemotherapy.


Subject(s)
Hope , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/drug therapy , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/psychology , Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy , Ovarian Neoplasms/psychology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anxiety/etiology , Anxiety/psychology , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial , Depression/etiology , Depression/psychology , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/psychology , Organoplatinum Compounds/pharmacology , Prognosis , Quality of Life , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome
16.
Gynecol Oncol ; 131(2): 437-44, 2013 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23994107

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The EORTC 55971 trial compared primary debulking surgery (PDS) versus neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS). The impact of both treatment arms on quality of life (QOL) is reported. METHODS: Patients with stages IIIc or IV ovarian cancer completed the EORTC QLQ-C30 before treatment, at the third and sixth cycle of chemotherapy, and at 6- and 12-month follow-up. RESULTS: Data of 404 patients (N=201 PDS arm; N=203 IDS arm) were included in the QOL analysis. Between treatment arms no statistically significant differences were found in any of the QOL functioning scales. Patients showed a clinically relevant improvement (>10 points) on the global health/QOL, role functioning, emotional functioning and social functioning scales during and after treatment independent of the type of treatment. Clinically relevant differences from baseline to the follow-up assessments were noted for fatigue, pain, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea indicating symptom control in both treatment arms. Institutions with good QOL compliance were associated with better outcomes. There was a statistical significant difference in the overall debulking status with 39.9% optimal debulking surgery in institutions with good QOL compliance compared to 19.9% in institutions with poor QOL compliance (p=0.0011). Overall survival (median 32.30 versus 23.29 months; p=0.0006) and progression free survival (median 12.35 versus 9.92 months; p=0.0002) were also significantly better. CONCLUSIONS: Survival and QOL after NACT followed by surgery was similar to survival and QOL after PDS followed by chemotherapy. However, institutions with good QOL compliance had better survival outcomes.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/drug therapy , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/surgery , Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy , Ovarian Neoplasms/surgery , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Neoplasm Staging , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/pathology , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/psychology , Organoplatinum Compounds/administration & dosage , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Ovarian Neoplasms/psychology , Quality of Life , Survival Rate
17.
Psychooncology ; 22(1): 83-8, 2013 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21919121

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to examine the impact of marital status on survival of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). METHODS: Patients with a diagnosis of EOC were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program for the period 1988-2006 and divided into married and unmarried groups. Statistical analysis using Student's t-test, Kaplan-Meier, and Cox regression proportional hazards was performed. RESULTS: In 49,777 patients with EOC, 51.2% were married and 48.8% were unmarried. White women were likely to be married compared with African Americans (52.0% vs 32.4%, p < 0.05). Younger age (63.9% vs 43.4%, p < 0.001) and early stage disease (37.5% vs 33.8%, p < 0.001) were more prominent in married patients compared with unmarried patients. Staging lymphadenectomy was performed more frequently in married than unmarried patients (39.9% vs 29.8%, p < 0.001). Overall 5-year survival was 45.0% for married patients and 33.1% for unmarried patients, p < 0.001. Married patients had a better survival compared with unmarried patients within each racial subgroup: 44.5% vs 33.3% for White women (p < 0.001), 36.9% vs 24.9% for African Americans (p < 0.001), and 53.7% vs 42.7% for others (p < 0.001), respectively. In a model that controlled for age, race, histology, stage, grade, and surgical treatment, married patients had a significantly improved survival compared with unmarried patients (HR 0.8, 95% CI 0.78-0.83, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this epidemiologic study, the social institution of marriage is associated with improved survival in women with ovarian cancer.


Subject(s)
Marital Status/statistics & numerical data , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/mortality , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/psychology , Ovarian Neoplasms/mortality , Ovarian Neoplasms/psychology , Survivors/psychology , Aged , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial , Female , Humans , Interpersonal Relations , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Neoplasm Staging , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/diagnosis , Ovarian Neoplasms/diagnosis , Population Surveillance , Prognosis , Proportional Hazards Models , Quality of Life , SEER Program , Sex Factors , Social Support , United States/epidemiology
18.
Gynecol Oncol ; 125(1): 59-64, 2012 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22155797

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: A cross-sectional, observational study to evaluate physical and psychological symptoms experienced by patients following completion of treatment for ovarian cancer and compared to symptoms documented in their hospital notes. METHODS: Women attending follow-up clinic at Hammersmith Hospital having undergone treatment for primary or relapsed ovarian cancer were asked to complete two validated questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-OV28) and a "wellbeing thermometer". Results were assessed and stratified by patient age, tumour stage, relapse status, type of chemotherapy received and treatment-free interval. Symptoms reported in questionnaires were compared to those documented in patients' hospital notes. RESULTS: Of 116 women approached, 100 (86%) participated in this study and had received chemotherapy for ovarian cancer between 2003 and 2010. The most frequently described and severe symptoms reported in the questionnaires were emotional symptoms, negative feelings about treatment or prognosis, fatigue and pain. Dyspareunia, cognitive impairment and peripheral neuropathy were also frequently described. Symptom severity was independent of variables such as disease stage, type of chemotherapy received and relapse status. The "wellbeing thermometer" scores closely correlated with pain, fatigue, weakness, gastrointestinal symptoms and attitude to disease or treatment (p<0.001). There was a marked discordance between questionnaire-reported symptoms and those recorded in hospital notes. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of women surveyed experienced persistent psychological and physical symptoms following ovarian cancer treatment; in particular: psychological concerns, sexual inactivity and fatigue, all potentially reversible with appropriate interventions. Our results highlight the extent of symptoms described by ovarian cancer survivors and the need for them to be adequately acknowledged and addressed.


Subject(s)
Ovarian Neoplasms/complications , Quality of Life , Survivors , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial , Combined Modality Therapy , Cross-Sectional Studies , Fallopian Tube Neoplasms/complications , Fallopian Tube Neoplasms/psychology , Fallopian Tube Neoplasms/therapy , Fatigue/etiology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Gastrointestinal Diseases/etiology , Humans , Logistic Models , Mental Disorders/etiology , Middle Aged , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/complications , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/psychology , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/therapy , Ovarian Neoplasms/psychology , Ovarian Neoplasms/therapy , Pain/etiology , Peritoneal Neoplasms/complications , Peritoneal Neoplasms/psychology , Peritoneal Neoplasms/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological/etiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Survivors/psychology
19.
Int J Gynecol Cancer ; 19(6): 1037-46, 2009 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19820365

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Clinical uncertainty currently exists for the timing of treatment for women with epithelial ovarian cancer who are under surveillance for their first recurrence and have rising cancer antigen 125 levels. This study ascertained women's preferences for this clinical scenario and the impact of regular surveillance on psychosocial well-being. METHODS: Women with a diagnosis of epithelial ovarian cancer who had completed primary treatment and were in surveillance for their first recurrence were eligible to participate. Treatment preferences were ascertained using the Prospective Measure of Preference, and psychological well-being was ascertained using a series of psychological scales. RESULTS: Women (n = 21) had highly variable preferences for the type and timing of second-line treatment when basing their decision on rising cancer antigen 125 levels. Around half indicated a preference against treatment and were willing to trade life expectancy (WTT) to avoid chemotherapy (WTT = 0.45) or tamoxifen (WTT = 0.50). For these women, strong preferences against treatment were reflected in high Prospective Measure of Preference utility scores (0.15 for chemotherapy and 0.19 for tamoxifen). The negative experience of chemotherapy, the uncertainty about tamoxifen's effectiveness, and remaining symptom-free influenced these decisions. The remaining women indicated they would begin chemotherapy or tamoxifen immediately. These women believed taking early steps to treatment was positive and a coping mechanism; however, some revealed unrealistic expectations of treatment. Most women reported good levels of psychological well-being and were coping with ongoing surveillance. CONCLUSIONS: Women in surveillance for recurrent ovarian cancer have highly variable preferences, and their reasons for their treatment choices are diverse. Therefore, although uncertainty exists for this clinical scenario, treatment preference should be ascertained on an individual basis.


Subject(s)
CA-125 Antigen/blood , Decision Making , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/psychology , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/therapy , Ovarian Neoplasms/psychology , Ovarian Neoplasms/therapy , Patient Preference , Antineoplastic Protocols , Biomarkers, Tumor/blood , Female , Humans , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/blood , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/diagnosis , Ovarian Neoplasms/blood , Ovarian Neoplasms/diagnosis , Patient Education as Topic , Patient Preference/psychology , Recurrence , Sentinel Surveillance , Social Class , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors , Up-Regulation
20.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 97(52): e13912, 2018 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30593210

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to evaluate the psychological distress and associated risk factors for distress among patients with gastric epithelial neoplasm undergoing endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).A total of 91 patients treated with ESD for gastric epithelial neoplasm between May 2015 and June 2016 were prospectively enrolled. Sociodemographic factors, psychological distress, anxiety, depression, stress, and associated risk factors for psychological distress were evaluated the day before ESD.Twenty-six (28.6%) patients were identified as patients with psychological distress. The psychological distress group had a higher female ratio and more depression and anxiety symptoms than the non-distress group. Distress was also related to stress level. A multivariate analysis showed that unmarried status (odds ratio [OR], 4.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13-21.56, P = .034), anxiety (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.12-1.39, P <.001), and stress (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.01-1.12, P = .011) were associated with psychological distress.An unmarried status and a high level of anxiety and stress were associated with more psychological distress in patients undergoing gastric ESD. It could be helpful to screen and proactively monitor patients with such conditions before performing gastric ESD.


Subject(s)
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection/psychology , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/psychology , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/surgery , Stomach Neoplasms/psychology , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Aged , Anxiety/epidemiology , Depression/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Socioeconomic Factors , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL