Surrogate endpoints in clinical trials of p16-positive squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx: an individual patient data meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The increased incidence of human papillomavirus (HPV)-related cancers has motivated efforts to optimise treatment for these patients with excellent prognosis. Validation of surrogates for overall survival could expedite the investigation of new therapies. We sought to evaluate candidate intermediate clinical endpoints in trials assessing definitive treatment of p16-positive oropharyngeal cancer with chemotherapy or radiotherapy. METHODS: We did a retrospective review of five multicentre, randomised trials (NRG/RTOG 9003, 0129, 0234, 0522, and 1016) that tested radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy in patients (aged ≥18 years) with p16-positive localised head or neck squamous-cell carcinomas. Eight intermediate clinical endpoints were considered as potential surrogates for overall survival: freedom from local progression, freedom from regional progression, freedom from distant metastasis, freedom from locoregional progression, freedom from any progression, locoregional progression-free survival, progression-free survival, and distant metastasis-free survival. We used a two-stage meta-analytical framework, which requires high correlation between the intermediate clinical endpoint and overall survival at the patient level (condition 1), and high correlation between the treatment effect on the intermediate clinical endpoint and the treatment effect on overall survival (condition 2). For both, an r2 greater than 0·7 was used as criteria for clinically relevant surrogacy. FINDINGS: We analysed 1373 patients with oropharyngeal cancer from May 9, 2020, to Nov 22, 2023. 1231 (90%) of patients were men, 142 (10%) were women, and 1207 (88%) were White, with a median age of 57 years (IQR 51-62). Median follow-up was 4·2 years (3·1-5·1). For the first condition, correlating the intermediate clinical endpoints with overall survival at the individual and trial level, the three composite endpoints of locoregional progression-free survival (Kendall's τ 0·91 and r2 0·72), distant metastasis-free survival (Kendall's τ 0·93 and r2 0·83), and progression-free survival (Kendall's τ 0·88 and r2 0·70) were highly correlated with overall survival at the patient level and at the trial-group level. For the second condition, correlating treatment effects of the intermediate clinical endpoints and overall survival, the composite endpoints of locoregional progression-free survival (r2 0·88), distant metastasis-free survival (r2 0·96), and progression-free survival (r2 0·92) remained strong surrogates. Treatment effects on the remaining intermediate clinical endpoints were less strongly correlated with overall survival. INTERPRETATION: We identified locoregional progression-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and progression-free survival as surrogates for overall survival in p16-positive oropharyngeal cancers treated with chemotherapy or radiotherapy, which could serve as clinical trial endpoints. FUNDING: NRG Oncology Operations, NRG Oncology SDMC, the National Cancer Institute, Eli Lilly, Aventis, and the University of Michigan.

Prospective manipulation of the gut microbiome with microbial ecosystem therapeutic 4 (MET4) in HPV-related locoregionally-advanced oropharyngeal cancer squamous cell carcinoma (LA-OPSCC) undergoing primary chemoradiation: ROMA2 study.

BACKGROUND: Gut microbiome modulation to boost antitumor immune responses is under investigation. METHODS: ROMA-2 evaluated the microbial ecosystem therapeutic (MET)-4 oral consortia, a mixture of cultured human stool-derived immune-responsiveness associated bacteria, given with chemoradiation (CRT) in HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer patients. Co-primary endpoints were safety and changes in stool cumulative MET-4 taxa relative abundance (RA) by 16SRNA sequencing. Stools and plasma were collected pre/post-MET-4 intervention for microbiome and metabolome analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients received ≥1 dose of MET-4 and were evaluable for safety: drug-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 13/29 patients: all grade 1-2 except one grade 3 (diarrhea). MET-4 was discontinued early in 7/29 patients due to CRT-induced toxicity, and in 1/29 due to MET-4 AEs. Twenty patients were evaluable for ecological endpoints: there was no increase in stool MET-4 RA post-intervention but trended to increase in stage III patients (p = 0.06). MET-4 RA was higher in stage III vs I-II patients at week 4 (p = 0.03) and 2-month follow-up (p = 0.01), which correlated with changes in plasma and stool targeted metabolomics. CONCLUSIONS: ROMA-2 did not meet its primary ecologic endpoint, as no engraftment was observed in the overall cohort. Exploratory findings of engraftment in stage III patients warrants further investigation of microbiome interventions in this subgroup.

Deciphering the interplay of HPV infection, MHC-II expression, and CXCL13+ CD4+ T cell activation in oropharyngeal cancer: implications for immunotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection has become an important etiological driver of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC), leading to unique tumor characteristics. However, the interplay between HPV-associated tumor cells and tumor microenvironment (TME) remains an enigma. METHODS: We performed a single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) on HPV-positive (HPV+) and HPV-negative (HPV‒) OPSCC tumors, each for three samples, and one normal tonsil tissue. Ex vivo validation assays including immunofluorescence staining, cell line co-culture, and flow cytometry analysis were used to test specific subtypes of HPV+ tumor cells and their communications with T cells. RESULTS: Through a comprehensive single-cell transcriptome analysis, we uncover the distinct transcriptional signatures between HPV+ and HPV‒ OPSCC. Specifically, HPV+ OPSCC tumor cells manifest an enhanced interferon response and elevated expression of the major histocompatibility complex II (MHC-II), potentially bolstering tumor recognition and immune response. Furthermore, we identify a CXCL13+CD4+ T cell subset that exhibits dual features of both follicular and pro-inflammatory helper T cells. Noteworthily, HPV+ OPSCC tumor cells embrace extensive intercellular communications with CXCL13+CD4+ T cells. Interaction with HPV+ OPSCC tumor cells amplifies CXCL13 and IFNγ release in CD4+T cells, fostering a pro-inflammatory TME. Additionally, HPV+ tumor cells expressing high MHC-II and CXCL13+CD4+ T cell prevalence are indicative of favorable overall survival rates in OPSCC patients. CONCLUSIONS: Together, our study underscores a synergistic inflammatory immune response orchestrated by highly immunogenic tumor cells and CXCL13+CD4+ T cells in HPV+ OPSCC, offering useful insights into strategy development for patient stratification and effective immunotherapy in OPSCC.

Update on Pathologic Conditions, Imaging Findings, Prevention, and Management of Human Papillomavirus-related Neoplasms.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common sexually transmitted infection that proliferates in the squamous epithelium and is the most common source of viral-related neoplasms. Low-risk subtypes (HPV-6 and -11) cause respiratory papillomas (laryngeal, tracheal, and bronchial) and condyloma acuminata of the penis, anus, and perineal region (anogenital warts). High-risk subtypes (HPV-16, -18, -31, and -33) are responsible for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) that involves the tongue base, tonsils, posterior pharyngeal wall, and larynx and malignancies of the anogenital region (cancers of the cervix, vagina, vulva, penis, and anal canal). Recent studies have increasingly shown a favorable treatment response and substantial differences in the overall prognosis associated with HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancers. Given this fact, oropharyngeal, cervical, and penile SCCs are classified as HPV-associated and HPV-independent cancers in the current World Health Organization classification. Imaging is essential in the early detection, diagnosis, and staging of HPV-associated cancers. Imaging also helps assess treatment response and postoperative complications and is used for long-term surveillance. HPV-associated oropharyngeal SCCs have well-defined borders and solid and cystic nodal metastases at imaging. Updated screening and vaccination guidelines are currently available that have great potential to decrease the overall disease burden and help control this worldwide public health concern. Novel therapeutic strategies, such as immunotherapies, are being explored, and imaging biomarkers that can predict treatment response and prognosis are being investigated; radiologists play a pivotal role in these efforts. ©RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article.

Trends in the treatment of human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal carcinoma in Slovakia.

The optimal treatment of oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) associated with human papillomavirus (HPV) is currently a subject of clinical research. This questionnaire study investigated current trends in the treatment of HPV-associated (HPV+) OPC in Slovakia with the incorporation of deintensification of oncological treatment into routine clinical practice outside of clinical trials. The Slovak Cooperative Head and Neck Cancer Group (SCHNCG) developed a questionnaire aimed at identifying trends in the oncological treatment of HPV+ OPC intended for all radiation oncology (RO) facilities in Slovakia. Specialists in the field of RO responded to general questions about the character of their individual institutions as well as to 4 theoretical clinical scenarios (case reports) regarding the treatment of HPV+ OPC, focusing primarily on the applied dose of radiotherapy (RT), the extent of target volumes, and the type of concurrent chemotherapy (CHT). The questionnaire study involved 35 RO specialists from 14 institutions in Slovakia. Regarding primary chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in T1N1M0 HPV+ OPC, 16 respondents (45.7%) would consider de-escalation of the RT dose to <70 Gy. In the case of postoperative RT in pT1pN1M0 HPV+ OPC with negative resection margins (R0) and absent extracapsular extension (ECE), 4 physicians (11.4%) would consider de-escalation of the RT dose to <60 Gy in the tumor bed area, while the majority of the treating specialists (n=19, 54.3%) would omit concurrent CHT. In the case of primary RT in elderly patient with T2N1M0 HPV+ OPC, the same number of physicians (n=16, 45.7%) would consider de-escalation of the RT dose to <70 Gy, and 14 respondents (40.0%) would completely omit CHT. In a high-risk patient with T2N3M0 HPV+ OPC with a complete response after 3 cycles of induction chemotherapy (iCHT), none of the respondents would indicate a reduction in the RT dose to the area of the original tumor and lymphadenopathy to <60 Gy. The doses and extent of irradiated volumes in the treatment of HPV+ OPC in Slovakia vary among different institutions. The tendency to de-escalate RT doses and reduce doses of concurrent systemic therapy in Slovakia is high and there was also an observed trend to reduce the extent of radiation treatment fields.

Treatment Complications Associated With Hospital Admission in Oropharyngeal Cancer Patients.

BACKGROUND: Oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) survivorship is a nursing priority because patients are living longer while significant short-term and long-term treatment complications that require nursing care are increasing. Hospital readmission is costly and reflects the quality of care patients receive. OBJECTIVES: This secondary analysis aimed to determine the prevalence of treatment complications resulting in hospital admissions among persons with OPC and examine the relationship between treatment complications resulting in hospital admission among persons with OPC and all other persons with head and neck cancer. METHODS: Using the National Inpatient Survey 2008-2019 database, we identified persons with relevant head and neck cancer diagnoses using specific International Classification of Disease ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes. Complications were operationalized by diagnosis-related codes; persons with codes for major elective surgery were excluded as our focus was posttreatment symptoms requiring hospitalization. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize persons with OPC hospitalized between 2008 and 2019. Binary logistic regression was used to assess complications using crude comparisons. The Elixhauser Comorbidity Index was used for controlling for comorbidities. RESULTS: The final analysis samples included 751,533: 164,770 persons with OPC and 586,763 with other head and cancers. The most prevalent diagnoses observed in those with OPC were esophagitis, nutrition disorder, hematological disorder, and renal failure; the least common diagnoses were sepsis, respiratory tract infection, and pneumonia. Binary regression revealed that persons with OPC experienced significantly more esophagitis, nutrition disorders, hematological disorders, and renal failure compared to persons with other head and neck cancers. DISCUSSION: Treatment of survivors of OPC requires more intensive monitoring for early symptoms associated with treatment, including esophagitis, nutrition disorders, bleeding disorders, and renal failure, than persons with other head and neck cancers. Monitoring laboratory values and clinical manifestations of these conditions is imperative. Nurses may encounter persons with OPC in emergency departments, outpatient radiology, or inpatient general medicine floors to manage swallowing difficulties, dehydration, malnutrition, and bleeding. Delayed or ineffective treatment of these conditions contributes to readmission, financial burden, and impairment of patient's quality of life. Future research should investigate the relationship between targeted treatment for expected complications and readmission rates in persons with OPC.

The impact of distance to facility on treatment modality, short-term outcomes, and survival of patients with HPV-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: This study compared treatment and outcomes for patients with HPV-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) based on their travel distance to treatment facility. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with cT1-4, N0-3, M0 HPV-positive OPSCC in the National Cancer Database from 2010 to 2019 were identified and split into four quartiles based on distance to facility, with quartile 4 representing patients with furthest travel distances. Multivariable-adjusted logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards modeling were used to analyze the primary outcome of treatment received, and secondary outcomes of clinical stage, overall survival, surgical approach (i.e., TORS versus other), and 30-day surgical readmissions. RESULTS: 17,207 patients with HPV-positive OPSCC were evenly distributed into four quartiles. Compared to patients in quartile 1, patients in quartile 4 were 40 % less likely to receive radiation versus surgery (OR = 0.60; 95 % CI = 0.54-0.66). Among the patients who received surgery, quartile 4 had a higher odds of receiving TORS treatment compared to quartile 1 (4v1: OR = 2.38; 95 % CI = 2.05-2.77), quartile 2 (4v2: OR = 2.31, 95 % CI = 2.00-2.66), and quartile 3 (4v3: OR = 1.75; 95 % CI = 1.54-1.99). Quartile 4 had a decreased odds of mortality compared to Quartile 1 (4v1: OR = 0.87; 95 % CI = 0.79-0.97). There were no differences among the quartiles in presenting stage and 30-day readmissions. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that patients with furthest travel distance to facility were more often treated surgically over non-surgical management, with TORS over open surgery, and had better overall survival. These findings highlight potential disparities in access to care for patients with HPV-positive OPSCC.

Metastatic oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma to the thyroid: A case report and review of literature.

Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) with metastasis to the thyroid gland is exceedingly rare, with limited documentation within the literature. Between 1984 and 2023, only 40 cases of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) with thyroid gland metastasis were described in published literature. Herein, we present a distinctive case of second primary oropharyngeal SCC with metastasis to the thyroid, detected during surveillance positron emission tomography (PET) scanning subsequent to negative margin resection and radiation therapy for SCC originating from the hard palate. The underlying mechanisms overseeing metastasis remain elusive, with hypotheses ranging from lymphatic drainage routes connecting the thyroid gland and retropharyngeal lymph nodes to hematologic dissemination. The management of metastases to the thyroid gland is multifaceted, encompassing approaches ranging from lobectomy and total thyroidectomy to palliative interventions. We present this atypical case alongside supportive pathological and radiological findings and a comprehensive review of this rare clinical entity to offer insight into its diagnosis and management.

A predictive survival model for patients with stage IV oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma treated with chemoradiation.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the pre-treatment and post-treatment clinical factors associated with rate of survival at 1, 3, and 5 years in stage IV oropharyngeal cancer patients treated with concurrent chemoradiation with/without neoadjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study involved 128 Stage IV oropharyngeal cancer patients that were treated at our tertiary referral center between 2008 and 2020. The pre-treatment and post-treatment clinical parameters including nutritional status and inflammatory markers were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: The 5-year overall survival rate for all patients was 36.72%. The disease-specific survival (DSS) at 1-year and 3-year were 80% and 63%, whereas the disease-free survival (DFS) at 1-year and 3-year were 49% and 40%, respectively. In multivariate analyses, pretreatment hemoglobin (Hb) < 12 g/dL (hazard ratio [HR] 2.551, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.366-4.762, p = 0.003), pretreatment systemic immune inflammation (SII) ≥ 1751 (HR 2.173, 95% CI 1.015-4.652, p = 0.046), and posttreatment systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) ≥ 261 (HR 2.074, 95% CI 1.045-4.115, p = 0.037) were independent indicators for worsened DSS. Pretreatment Hb < 12 g/dl (HR 1.692, 95% CI 1.019-2.809, p = 0.032), pretreatment SII ≥ 1751 (HR 1.968, 95% CI 1.061-3.650, p = 0.032), and posttreatment SII ≥ 1690 (HR 1.922, 95% CI 1.105-3.345, p = 0.021) were independent indicators for worsened DFS. A nomogram was developed using pretreatment Hb, pretreatment SII, and posttreatment SIRI to forecast DSS. CONCLUSIONS: The pretreatment Hb, pretreatment SII, posttreatment SII, and posttreatment SIRI are associated with survival in patients with stage IV oropharyngeal cancers. The developed nomogram aids in survival prediction and treatment adjustment.

Radiomics analysis for the prediction of locoregional recurrence of locally advanced oropharyngeal cancer and hypopharyngeal cancer.

PURPOSE: By radiomic analysis of the postcontrast CT images, this study aimed to predict locoregional recurrence (LR) of locally advanced oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) and hypopharyngeal cancer (HPC). METHODS: A total of 192 patients with stage III-IV OPC or HPC from two independent cohort were randomly split into a training cohort with 153 cases and a testing cohort with 39 cases. Only primary tumor mass was manually segmented. Radiomic features were extracted using PyRadiomics, and then the support vector machine was used to build the radiomic model with fivefold cross-validation process in the training data set. For each case, a radiomics score was generated to indicate the probability of LR. RESULTS: There were 94 patients with LR assigned in the progression group and 98 patients without LR assigned in the stable group. There was no significant difference of TNM staging, treatment strategies and common risk factors between these two groups. For the training data set, the radiomics model to predict LR showed 83.7% accuracy and 0.832 (95% CI 0.72, 0.87) area under the ROC curve (AUC). For the test data set, the accuracy and AUC slightly declined to 79.5% and 0.770 (95% CI 0.64, 0.80), respectively. The sensitivity/specificity of training and test data set for LR prediction were 77.6%/89.6%, and 66.7%/90.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The image-based radiomic approach could provide a reliable LR prediction model in locally advanced OPC and HPC. Early identification of those prone to post-treatment recurrence would be helpful for appropriate adjustments to treatment strategies and post-treatment surveillance.

Therapeutic Advances and Challenges for the Management of HPV-Associated Oropharyngeal Cancer.

The use of conventional chemotherapy in conjunction with targeted and immunotherapy drugs has emerged as an option to limit the severity of side effects in patients diagnosed with head and neck cancer (HNC), particularly oropharyngeal cancer (OPC). OPC prevalence has increased exponentially in the past 30 years due to the prevalence of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. This study reports a comprehensive review of clinical trials registered in public databases and reported in the literature (PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and ISI web of science databases). Of the 55 clinical trials identified, the majority (83.3%) were conducted after 2015, of which 77.7% were performed in the United States alone. Eight drugs have been approved by the FDA for HNC, including both generic and commercial forms: bleomycin sulfate, cetuximab (Erbitux), docetaxel (Taxotere), hydroxyurea (Hydrea), pembrolizumab (Keytruda), loqtorzi (Toripalimab-tpzi), methotrexate sodium (Trexall), and nivolumab (Opdivo). The most common drugs to treat HPV-associated OPC under these clinical trials and implemented as well for HPV-negative HNC include cisplatin, nivolumab, cetuximab, paclitaxel, pembrolizumab, 5-fluorouracil, and docetaxel. Few studies have highlighted the necessity for new drugs specifically tailored to patients with HPV-associated OPC, where molecular mechanisms and clinical prognosis are distinct from HPV-negative tumors. In this context, we identified most mutated genes found in HPV-associated OPC that can represent potential targets for drug development. These include TP53, PIK3CA, PTEN, NOTCH1, RB1, FAT1, FBXW7, HRAS, KRAS, and CDKN2A.

[Surgical Treatment of Oropharyngeal Cancer - Recommendations of the Current German S3 Guideline, Part I]. / Chirurgische Therapie des Oropharynxkarzinoms: Empfehlungen der aktuellen S3-Leitlinie ­ Teil I.

In general, a trend towards transoral resection (as opposed to classic open approaches) + neck dissection + adjuvant radio- (chemo-) therapy has been observed for oropharyngeal carcinoma over the last 20 years. Techniques of transoral surgery (TOS), including transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) and transoral robotic surgery (TORS) have been propagated in retrospective comparisons with conventional surgery or primary radiochemotherapy as gentle, minimally invasive procedures with good late functional results. Meta-analyses of mostly uncontrolled retrospective analyses suggest that TORS may have better disease-free survival (DFS) and a reduced risk of free flap reconstruction compared with open surgery. TORS (TOS) was associated with fewer tumor-positive resection margins (R1), a lower number of recurrences, fewer intraoperative tracheostomies, a shorter inpatient stay and a shorter duration of postoperative nasal tube feeding compared to open surgery. In principle, based on the best evidence currently available from registry studies, stage I-II oropharyngeal carcinomas can be treated either with primary surgery or radiochemotherapy with a comparable chance of survival. With comparable evidence for stage III and IVa, p16neg. oropharyngeal carcinomas, the majority of authors advocate primary surgery followed by adjuvant radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy as the treatment of first choice. For p16pos. patients the results of registry studies are inconsistent, although the largest registry study on 450 HPV-positive stage III patients shows a significant superiority of primary surgery + adjuvant radiochemotherapy. Since all registry studies did not adjust for smoking status, among other factors, the current data situation should be evaluated with the necessary caution.

[Surgical Treatment of Hypopharyngeal Carcinoma, Neck Dissection and Adjuvant Postoperative Therapy of Oropharyngeal and Hypopharyngeal Cancer: Recommendations of the current S3 Guideline - Part II]. / Neck Dissection und adjuvante postoperative Therapie beim Oro- und Hypopharynxkarzinom: Empfehlungen der aktuellen S3-Leitlinie ­ Teil II.

Part II of the S3 guideline report deals with the surgical treatment of hypopharyngeal carcinoma, neck dissection for oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinomas and adjuvant therapy options. Primary surgical therapy ± adjuvant radio- or radiochemotherapy and primary radio- or radiochemotherapy are established as primary therapies for local-regional hypopharyngeal carcinomas. Direct randomized comparisons of both basic therapeutic procedures were never conducted. Available registry data show a worse prognosis of hypopharyngeal carcinoma compared to oropharyngeal carcinomas in all locoregional tumor stages, regardless of the treatment method. For T1N0-T2N0 squamous cell carcinoma of the hypopharynx, there are no relevant differences in overall survival and locoregional relapse rate between primary surgical and primary non-surgical treatment. Primary surgical therapy ± adjuvant radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy and primary radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy are established as primary therapies for advanced but locoregionally limited hypopharyngeal carcinomas. Neck dissection is an integral part of the primary surgical treatment of oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer. There are only a few randomized studies on non-surgical organ preservation for advanced hypopharyngeal cancer as an alternative to pharyngolaryngectomy, but these have led to the recommendation of alternative concepts in the new guideline. The indication and implementation of postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy and radiochemotherapy for hypopharyngeal carcinoma do not differ from those for HPV/p16-negative and -positive oropharyngeal carcinoma.

Effectiveness of treatment of oropharyngeal carcinoma patients.

OBJECTIVE: Aim: To analyze the results of treatment of patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and Methods: 276 patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma were treated in 2008-2021. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy consisted of three to six cycles: paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 and carboplatin 350 mg/m2 (or cisplatin 100 mg/m2) on the first day. The interval between cycles was 21 days. After the cycles, all patients were prescribed a course of radiation therapy in a total focal dose (TFD) of 65 Gy. The outcome of treatment was assessed by the degree of tumor regression according to RECIST criteria one month after the end of combination treatment. Statistical processing was performed using STATISTICA 6.1 software (StatSoftInc). RESULTS: Results: The three- and five-year survival rates of the examined patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma after treatment were 40.8% respectively (95% CI 33.7 - 47.9) and 27.0%, (95% CI 20.6 - 33, 4) with a median survival of 36 months with 95% CI (35.5 - 40.2). Processing was performed using STATISTICA 6.1 software (StatSoftInc). CONCLUSION: Сonclusions: Analysis of treatment of patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma with predominance of squamous cell carcinoma (90.6%), localized primarily in the palatine tonsil (73.2%), with the most common stages T3N1M0 (30.1%) and T3N1M0 %), with regional metastases to the lymph nodes of the neck (89.9%), showed that the effectiveness of treatment of patients is quite high, because in most of the examined in the short term after combined treatment there was complete or partial regression of the tumor (91.7%), no progression of the oncological process was detected in any of them.

Liquid biopsy in head neck cancer: ready for clinical routine diagnostics?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The bodily fluids of patients with solid cancers representing a minimally-invasive source of clinically exploitable biomarkers have attracted an increasing amount of attention in recent years. In patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), cell-free tumour DNA (ctDNA) belongs to the most promising liquid biomarkers for monitoring disease burden and identifying patients at high risk of recurrence. In this review, we highlight recent studies, evaluating the analytical validity and clinical utility of ctDNA as a dynamic biomarker in HNSCC, especially as it relates to risk stratification and contrasting human papilloma virus (HPV+ and HPV-) and carcinomas. RECENT FINDINGS: The clinical potential of minimal residual disease monitoring through viral ctDNA in identifying HPV+ oropharyngeal carcinoma patients at higher risk of recurrence has recently been demonstrated. Furthermore, accumulating evidence supports a potential diagnostic value of ctDNA dynamics in HPV-negative HNSCC. Altogether, recent data suggest that ctDNA analysis may be a valuable tool in guiding (de)escalation of surgical interventions as well as adaptation in radiotherapy dosage, both in the definitive and adjuvant settings. SUMMARY: Rigorous clinical trials with patient-relevant endpoints are critical in order to demonstrate that treatment decisions based on ctDNA dynamics result in better outcomes in HNSCC.

Disparities in survival outcomes among Black patients with HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer.

Patients with human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV-OPSCC) have a favorable prognosis and excellent overall survival (OS), and studies have demonstrated these findings in cohorts of predominantly White patients. Racial/ethnic (R/E) minorities, particularly Black patients, with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) have worse survival outcomes compared with White patients. In this study, we aimed to determine if Black patients with HPV-OPSCC have a similar favorable prognosis to the White population. This was a population-based retrospective cohort study that analyzed HNSCC patients using the National Cancer Database from 2010 to 2016. We identified patients with Stage I-IV HPV- OPSCC who were treated with radiation, surgery, chemotherapy, or a combination of modalities. Patient outcomes were stratified by R/E groups including White Versus Black patients. The main outcome in this study was OS. Analyses for proportions of categorical variables were performed using a χ2  or Fisher's exact test. Univariate and multivariate time-to-event survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier product limit estimates and log-rank test to test the differences between strata. A Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to assess the association between covariates and risk of death (OS). We identified 9256 OPSCC patients who met inclusion criteria and were treated between 2010 and 2016, of which 7912 were White (85.5%) and 1344 were Black (14.5%). A total of 1727 were HPV-OPSCC, of which 1598 were White (92.5%) and 129 (7.5%) were Black. By race, the 5-year OS for White versus Black OPSCC patients was 42% versus 23%, respectively (log-rank, p < 0.0001). Among HPV-positive OPSCC patients, the 5-year OS for White versus Black patients was 65% versus 39% (log-rank, p < 0.0001). Among HPV-negative patients, the 5-year OS for White versus Black patients was 36% versus 13% (log-rank, p < 0.0001). On multivariate analysis, after accounting for age, sex, insurance status, income, Charlson-Deyo score, receipt of surgery, distance from facility, and total treatment time, Black race trended toward, but was not associated with worse survival. Hazard ratio (HR:1.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.85-1.81, p = 0.255). This national cohort study of OPSCC patients demonstrates that Black patients with HPV-OPSCC have a poor prognosis and OS similar to HPV-negative White patients. This may be partly due to socioeconomic barriers such as insurance and income. Further work is needed to better understand the specific drivers of inferior survival outcomes in this specific patient population.

Associations between Human Papillomavirus Status, Weight Change, and Survival of Oropharyngeal Cancer Patients.

This study examined associations between HPV status and weight change in oropharyngeal cancer (OPC). OPC patients receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy in Toronto, Canada were included. Relationships were assessed between HPV status and weight loss grade (WLG, combining weight loss and current body mass index); weight change during treatment; and HPV status and WLG/weight change on overall (OS) and cancer-specific (CSS) survival. Of 717 patients, WLG pre-radiation was less severe among HPV-positive compared to HPV-negative, though weight loss during treatment was greater. The adjusted odds ratio for greater WLG among HPV-positive versus HPV-negative was 0.47 (95%CI 0.28-0.78). Grade-4 WLG (worst category) experienced poorer OS and CSS (OS adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 4.08; 95%CI 1.48-11.2, compared to Grade-0); and was non-significant for HPV-negative (aHR 2.34; 95%CI 0.69-7.95). Relationships between weight change before/during treatment and survival had similar direction between HPV-positive and HPV-negative, but of greater magnitude in HPV-positive patients.

De-Escalation Treatment for Human Papillomavirus-Related Oropharyngeal Cancer: Questions for Practical Consideration.

Human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), which accounts for an increasing proportion of all head and neck cancers, represents a specific entity with distinct clinical and molecular characteristics. It is now firmly established that patients with HPV-positive oropharyngeal SCC have a significantly improved prognosis because this variant has exquisite radiosensitivity compared with HPV-negative oropharyngeal SCC; thus, it can be targeted with de-escalated approaches using reduced doses of radiation and/or chemotherapy. The overriding goal of de-escalation is to maintain the high cure and survival rates associated with traditional approaches while reducing the incidence of both short- and long-term toxicity. Although the exact reason for the improved radiosensitivity of HPV-positive oropharyngeal carcinoma is unclear, prospective studies have now been published demonstrating that de-escalated radiation can successfully maintain high rates of cure and preserve the quality of life for appropriately selected patients with this disease. However, these studies have been complicated by such factors as the relatively limited sample sizes, as well as the variability in treatment, inclusion criteria, and follow-up. How treatment paradigms will evolve, particularly in the era of precision medicine, is a provocative question and is the subject of this review.

Immunotherapy in HPV-Related Oropharyngeal Cancers.

OPINION STATEMENT: Human papillomavirus (HPV)-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) incidence has been increasing in recent decades. Treatment of the locally advanced HPV-related OPSCC includes a multidisciplinary approach. Immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors is used in the treatment of patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC), including HPV-related OPSCC patients. There is increasing knowledge of the role of HPV in the tumor immune microenvironment. Therefore, HPV status of OPSCC plays an essential role in the design of immunotherapy clinical trials in both curative intent and metastatic settings. Moreover, HPV has become a potential therapeutic target, with vaccines and adoptive T-cell therapies being developed against HPV for the treatment of OPSCC. Several novel studies are designed to target HPV in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Thus, HPV-related OPSCC remains a unique subgroup in the immunotherapy era.

An education resource for human papillomavirus oropharyngeal cancer patients: think-aloud interviews.

PURPOSE: The human papillomavirus (HPV) is well recognised as a factor in developing oropharyngeal cancer (OPC). A booklet for HPV-OPC patients aimed to deliver evidence-based messages in everyday language, in a way to minimise negative psychological impacts on patients. Our study explored the suitability of the booklet for use. METHODS: Participants were recruited through social media and interviewed via Zoom. Participants were shown the booklet and a think-aloud method elicited real-time reactions to the content. Responses were analysed for each section and coded as either for or against for content, with other responses thematically analysed using NVivo. RESULTS: The sample comprised 24 participants: patients (n = 19) who completed treatment for HPV-OPC and partners of survivors of HPV-OPC (n = 5). All participants found the booklet useful, and most wished the resource had been available previously. Some indicated the information was new to them. The majority agreed the booklet would be best delivered by their specialist at point of diagnosis and would be a useful resource for friends and family. Most participants gave feedback on improvements to the booklet in terms of comprehension and design. Overall, participants found the content easy to understand. Most participants found that it helped to reduce shame and stigma associated with HPV as a sexually transmitted infection. CONCLUSION: An evidence-based booklet for HPV-OPC patients and their partners is acceptable. Implementation may be feasible in routine clinical practice, specifically at time of diagnosis. Adapting the content will help optimise the efficacy of the booklet in facilitating communication between all stakeholders.