Educational needs of fertility healthcare professionals using ART: a multi-country mixed-methods study.

RESEARCH QUESTION: What are the most pressing educational needs of fertility healthcare professionals using assisted reproductive technologies (ART)? DESIGN: This mixed-methods study combined qualitative interviews with quantitative surveys. Participants included physicians and nurses specialized in reproductive endocrinology or in obstetrics/gynaecology, and laboratory specialists, with a minimum of 3 years of experience, practising in Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Spain or the UK. Maximum variation purposive sampling was used to ensure a mix of experience and settings. Interviews were transcribed and coded through thematic analysis. Quantitative data were analysed using frequency tables, cross-tabulations and chi-squared tests to compare results by reimbursement context. RESULTS: A total of 535 participants were included (273 physicians, 145 nurses and 117 laboratory specialists). Knowledge gaps, skills gaps and attitude issues were identified in relation to: (i) ovarian stimulation (e.g. knowledge of treatments and instruction protocols for ovarian stimulation), (ii) embryo culture and cryopreservation/vitrification (e.g. diverging opinions on embryo freezing, (iii) embryo assessment (e.g. performing genetic testing), (iv) support of luteal phase and optimizing pregnancy outcomes (e.g. knowledge of assessment methods for endometrial receptivity), and (v) communication with patients (e.g. reluctance to address emotional distress). CONCLUSIONS: This descriptive, exploratory study corroborates previously reported gaps in fertility care and identifies potential causes of these gaps. Findings provide evidence to inform educational programmes for healthcare professionals who use ART in their practice and calls for the development of case-based education and interprofessional training programmes to improve care for patients with fertility issues.

Automated anti-Mullerian hormone measurement: data review to provide insights and interpretation.

RESULTS: AMH results were pooled and a table with 2.5 and 97.5 percentiles for each age group constructed. Based on Youden index, the optimal cut off for low responders (0-3 eggs), was 5.5 pmol/l (87% sensitivity, 55% specificity) and for high responders (>15 eggs) 15.6 pmol/l (78% sensitivity, 57% specificity). AMH correlated with number of eggs collected (r = 0.48) and clinical pregnancies (r = 0.14), (p < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: The table of AMH levels measured using the Access 2 fully automated immunoassay system according to age may be used as a reference and cutoff levels for high and poor responders are clearly defined to help tailor controlled ovarian stimulation, maximizing efficiency and ensuring patient safety. The use of a random access automated immunoassay system means that blood sampled on arrival can produce an AMH result in 40 mins by the time the subject enters the doctor's clinic together with other relevant endocrine markers.

Delayed versus immediate frozen embryo transfer after oocyte retrieval: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare pregnancy outcomes between immediate frozen embryo transfer (FET) performed within the first menstrual cycle after oocyte retrieval and delayed FET following subsequent cycles. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science were searched for eligible studies through January 2020. The main outcome measures were clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), live birth rate (LBR), and pregnancy loss rate (PLR). The effect size was estimated as risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) using a random effects model. Inter-study heterogeneity was assessed by the I2 statistic. RESULTS: Twelve retrospective cohort studies involving 18,230 cycles were included. The pooled results revealed no significant differences between delayed and immediate FET in CPR (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.87-1.03; I2 = 67.9%), LBR (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.85-1.03; I2 = 67.5%), and PLR (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.87-1.26; I2 = 42.7%). Subgroup analyses of freeze-all cycles showed a marginal decrease of CPR in delayed FET (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.86-1.00; I2 = 53.6%), but no significant changes were observed regarding LBR (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.85-1.02; I2 = 65.2%) and PLR (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.84-1.41; I2 = 59.1%). No statistical differences were found in effect estimates among other subgroup analyses by ovarian stimulation protocol, trigger agent, endometrial preparation regimen, and embryo stage. CONCLUSION: Timing of the first FET after oocyte retrieval was not significantly associated with pregnancy outcomes. This finding refutes the current common practice to delay FET after oocyte retrieval and reassures patients who wish to proceed with FET at their earliest convenience. Due to the high heterogeneity and observational nature of included studies, further randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm the results.

Could the Age Difference of a Single Calendar Year between Patients Undergoing IVF at 34, 35 or at 36 Years Old Affect the IVF Outcome? A Retrospective Data Analysis.

Background and Objectives: Clinicians are called to overcome age-related challenges in decision making during In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) treatment. The aim of this study was to investigate the possible impact of a single calendar year difference among patients aged 34, 35 and 36 on IVF outcomes. Materials and Methods: Medical records between 2008 and 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. The study group consisted of women diagnosed with tubal factor infertility. Sample size was divided in three categories at 34, 35 and 36 years of age. Embryo transfer including two blastocysts was performed for every patient. Comparisons were performed regarding hormonal profile, response to stimulation, quality of transferred embryos, positive hCG test and clinical pregnancy rate. Results: A total of 706 women were eligible to participate. Two-hundred and forty-eight women were 34, 226 were 35 while the remaining 232 were 36 years old. Regarding the hormonal profile, the number of accumulated oocytes and the quality of embryos transferred, no statistically significant difference was documented between the three age groups. Women aged 34 and 35 years old indicated a significantly increased positive hCG rate in comparison to women aged 36 years old (p-value = 0.009, p-value = 0.023, respectively). Women aged 34 and 35 years old presented with a higher clinical pregnancy rate in comparison to those aged 36 years old (p-value = 0.04, p-value = 0.05, respectively). Conclusion: A calendar year difference between patients undergoing IVF treatment at 34 or 35 years of age does not appear to exert any influence regarding outcome. When treatment involves patients above the age of 35, then a single calendar year may exert considerable impact on IVF outcome. This observation indicates that age 35 may serve as a valid cut-off point regarding IVF outcome.

High proportion of immature oocytes in a cohort reduces fertilization, embryo development, pregnancy and live birth rates following ICSI.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Ooplasmic maturity has been studied for some time, but remains poorly defined. This study aimed to evaluate metaphase II (MII) oocyte competence in terms of fertilization, embryo development and cycle outcomes, according to the oocyte maturity ratio. DESIGN: Couples treated by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) between 1993 and 2017 with female partners ≤35 years old were included. Cycles were divided into four groups according to proportion of MII oocytes at the time of retrieval: optimal (76-100%), adequate (51-75%), partial (26-50%) and minimal (1-25%). RESULTS: A total of 7672 ICSI cycles (optimal: 4838; adequate: 2252; partial: 518; minimal oocyte maturity: 64) were included, in which 95,667 MII oocytes were injected using ejaculated spermatozoa. The decreasing proportion of MII significantly reduced normal fertilization (two pronuclei) (78.9% to 71.3%; P < 0.0001) with a corresponding increase in digynic three-pronuclei that rose from 2.6% in the optimal group to 4.7% in the minimal group (P = 0.003). Implantation (33% to 17%; P < 0.0001), clinical pregnancy (63.6% to 37.5%; P < 0.0001) and live birth rates (49.2% to 26.6%; P < 0.0001) were affected by the decreasing proportion of MII oocytes. CONCLUSIONS: A high proportion of immature sibling oocytes in the retrieved cohort affects the fertilization rate and embryo developmental competence of MII inseminated oocytes, clinical pregnancy and live birth rates, suggesting that, in addition to nuclear maturity, ooplasmic and membrane maturity are required for developmental competence of MII oocytes. These findings may provide guidance toward ovarian stimulation protocols aimed at achieving a greater proportion of MII oocytes, leading to higher fertilization rates and better pregnancy outcomes.

An upper limit of gonadotropin dose in patients undergoing ART should be advocated.

AIM: As no upper limit of the daily dose of gonadotropins (DD GN) used for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) in patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART) has been established, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of using different DD GN in terms of live-birth achievement. METHODS: Data of patients treated at a single university medical center during the same period was analyzed retrospectively. Four groups were analyzed according to the DD GN administered: group I ("high dose"): >225- ≤ 375 IU; Group II ("Very high dose"): 376-450 IU; group III ("extremely high dose"): 451-600 IU. Normo-responders treated with DD GN ≤250 IU served as control (C). Variables included were DD GN, total GN dose/cycle, age, FSH, BMI, gravidity, parity, cycle number, IVF/ICSI, infertility diagnosis treatment protocol and outcome parameters. RESULTS: The analysis of 1394 treatment cycles of 943 patients indicated that DD and total dose of GN correlated negatively with the number of oocytes, implantation, clinical pregnancy and live-birth rate (25.9%, 14.6%, 11.4% and 4.7% in groups C, I, II and III, respectively) The logistic regression analysis indicated that the adjusted odds ratios for LBR correlated inversely with the DD administered - independently from age, baseline FSH, BMI and previous failed cycles. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing the daily dose of GN to doses higher than 450 IU or a total dose of 3000 IU/cycle is at least questionable if not harmful.

Reference values in ovarian response to controlled ovarian stimulation throughout the reproductive period.

Abstract The age-related decline in ovarian response to gonadotropins has been well known since the beginning of ovarian stimulation in IVF cycles and has been considered secondary to the age-related decline in ovarian reserve. The objective of this study was to establish reference values and to construct nomograms of ovarian response for any specific age to gonadotropins in IVF/ICSI cycles. We analyzed our database containing information on IVF cycles. According to inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 703 patients were selected. Among inclusion criteria, there were regular menstrual cycle, treatment with a long GnRH agonist protocol and starting follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) dose of at least 200 IU per day. To estimate the reference values of ovarian response, the CG-LMS method was used. A linear decline in the parameters of ovarian response with age was observed: the median number of oocytes decreases approximately by one every three years, and the median number of follicles >16 mm by one every eight years. The number of oocytes and growing follicles corresponding to the 5th, 25th, 50th, 75th and 95th centiles has been calculated. This study confirmed the well known negative relationship between ovarian response to FSH and female ageing and permitted the construction of nomograms of ovarian response.

Adding the phytoestrogen Cimicifugae Racemosae to clomiphene induction cycles with timed intercourse in polycystic ovary syndrome improves cycle outcomes and pregnancy rates - a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Owing to their potential to act as estrogen receptor modulators and interfere with aromatase enzyme in animal studies, phytoestrogens (PE) may be useful as part of ovulation induction for polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients <35 years, presenting with infertility and PCOS, were included and randomly allocated to either group I (clomiphene citrate; CC) or group II (CC plus Cimicifugae racemosae; CR). Primary outcome was pregnancy rate. Secondary outcomes included ovulation, midcycle serum estradiol and luteinizing hormone (LH) as well as mid-luteal serum progesterone. RESULTS: Analysis included 98 patients in group I versus 96 patients in group II. Both groups were matched regarding demographics and basic data. Significant differences were elicited when comparing days until HCG injection (15.0 ± 1.7 versus 12.0 ± 1.9, p=0.91), endometrial thickness (mm) (8.5 ± 1.9 versus 12.5 ± 1.9, p<0.001), serum levels of mid-luteal and midcycle estradiol (p<0.001; Figure 2), LH (IU/ml) (p<0.001) as well as mid-luteal progesterone (p<0.001). PE plus CC group had significantly higher clinical pregnancies per cycle (33/192 (17.2%) versus 71/204 (34.8%), p<0.01), compared to the CC only group. CONCLUSIONS: Adding CR to clomiphene-induction cycles with timed intercourse in polycystic ovarian syndrome improves cycle outcomes and pregnancy rates.

Role of baseline antral follicle count and anti-Mullerian hormone in the index stimulation cycle of IVF treatment in predicting outcome of subsequent frozen-thawed embryo transfers.

This retrospective cohort study aims at determining whether baseline antral follicle count (AFC) and serum anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) level in the index stimulation cycle predict live-birth outcome in subsequent frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles. We studied 500 women undergoing the first IVF cycle who had embryo(s) cryopreserved. The main outcome measures were live-birth in the first FET cycle and cumulative live-birth in all the FETs combined after the same stimulation cycle. Our results showed that baseline AFC and AMH level on the day before ovarian stimulation showed significant correlation. In the first FET cycle, AFC and AMH level were significantly higher in subjects attaining live-birth in the first FET cycle or cumulative live-birth from all FETs than those who did not. Both AMH and AFC were insignificant predictors of live-birth in the first FET cycle or cumulative live-birth after adjusting for age. The areas under the ROC curves for AMH, AFC and age were 0.654, 0.625 and 0.628, respectively, for predicting cumulative live-birth. In conclusion, we reported for the first time that baseline AFC and AMH in the index stimulation cycle have only modest predictive performance on cumulative live-birth in subsequent FET cycles.

A new ovarian response prediction index (ORPI): implications for individualised controlled ovarian stimulation.

BACKGROUND: The objective was to present a new ovarian response prediction index (ORPI), which was based on anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels, antral follicle count (AFC) and age, and to verify whether it could be a reliable predictor of the ovarian stimulation response. METHODS: A total of 101 patients enrolled in the ICSI programme were included. The ORPI values were calculated by multiplying the AMH level (ng/ml) by the number of antral follicles (2-9 mm), and the result was divided by the age (years) of the patient (ORPI=(AMH x AFC)/Patient age). RESULTS: The regression analysis demonstrated significant (P<0.0001) positive correlations between the ORPI and the total number of oocytes and of MII oocytes collected. The logistic regression revealed that the ORPI values were significantly associated with the likelihood of pregnancy (odds ratio (OR): 1.86; P=0.006) and collecting greater than or equal to 4 oocytes (OR: 49.25; P<0.0001), greater than or equal to 4 MII oocytes (OR: 6.26; P<0.0001) and greater than or equal to 15 oocytes (OR: 6.10; P<0.0001). Regarding the probability of collecting greater than or equal to 4 oocytes according to the ORPI value, the ROC curve showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.91 and an efficacy of 88% at a cut-off of 0.2. In relation to the probability of collecting greater than or equal to 4 MII oocytes according to the ORPI value, the ROC curve had an AUC of 0.84 and an efficacy of 81% at a cut-off of 0.3. The ROC curve for the probability of collecting greater than or equal to 15 oocytes resulted in an AUC of 0.89 and an efficacy of 82% at a cut-off of 0.9. Finally, regarding the probability of pregnancy occurrence according to the ORPI value, the ROC curve showed an AUC of 0.74 and an efficacy of 62% at a cut-off of 0.3. CONCLUSIONS: The ORPI exhibited an excellent ability to predict a low ovarian response and a good ability to predict a collection of greater than or equal to 4 MII oocytes, an excessive ovarian response and the occurrence of pregnancy in infertile women. The ORPI might be used to improve the cost-benefit ratio of ovarian stimulation regimens by guiding the selection of medications and by modulating the doses and regimens according to the actual needs of the patients.

A short narrative review of the feasibility of adopting mild ovarian stimulation for IVF as the current standard of care.

INTRODUCTION: Mild ovarian stimulation has been conceived, proposed and implemented in clinical practice as a safer and cheaper alternative to conventional strategies of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in preparation for in vitro fertilization (IVF). Our aim was to summarize the key evidence on this topic and explore its possible role as the standard treatment option for women undergoing IVF. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A short narrative review of the existing literature, with emphasis on mild ovarian stimulation clinical and cost effectiveness, as well as treatment limitations. RESULTS: Numerous studies highlight mild ovarian stimulation's favorable characteristics with respect to oocyte/embryo quality, reduced patient risk, and ease of intervention. There is, however, a need for high-quality laboratory environment. Limitations regarding poor responders, older women, or those seeking ovarian stimulation for non-infertility indications should also be considered. Finally, outcomes on the cumulative success rates and the cost effectiveness of mild ovarian stimulation remain inconclusive. CONCLUSION: Mild ovarian stimulation protocols for IVF should currently be implemented only in carefully selected populations. Further research is needed to clarify the remaining controversies in this IVF approach.

[Mexican National Consensus on Assisted Reproduction Treatment]. / Consenso Nacional Mexicano de Reproducción Asistida.

BACKGROUND: It is estimated that 15% of couples living in industrialized countries are infertile, ie have failed to conceive, reproductive age, after 12 months ormore of regular intercourse without contraception. During the past decade has increased the demand for fertility treatments because they believe are moreeffective now. OBJECTIVE: To unify the therapeutic approach and service to patients and set a precedent for a Mexican Official Standard respect and support for the legislation of these procedures. METHOD: Consensus by technical experts group panel with the participation of 34 national centers accredited for use in assisted reproduction. He organized seven workshops with the following themes: 1) selection of patients for assisted reproduction treatment, 2) schemes controlled ovarian stimulation for assisted reproduction techniques of high complexity, 3) preparation and egg retrieval technique, 4) transferembryo; 5) luteal phase supplementation; 6) indications and techniques of cryopreservation and 7) informed consent. Each table had a coordinator who wrote and presented the findings to the full, it made a number of observations until they reached unanimity of criteria, which are reflected in this document. RESULTS: Patient selection for assisted reproduction techniques is the first step of the process. Proper selection lead to success, in the same way that a bad pick up for failure. In the case of egg donation the most important recommendation is that only one to two embryos transferred in order to reduce multiple pregnancy rates and maintaining high pregnancy rates.

Multiple gestation associated with infertility therapy: a committee opinion.

This Committee Opinion provides practitioners with suggestions to reduce the likelihood of iatrogenic multiple gestation resulting from infertility treatment. This document replaces the document of the same name previously published in 2012 (Fertil Steril 2012;97:825-34 by the American Society for Reproductive Medicine).

Ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation in women with cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing random and conventional starts.

OBJECTIVE: In female cancer patients anticipating chemotherapy or radiation, oocyte retrieval for fertility should be performed as efficiently as possible to avoid postponing cancer treatments. Our objective was to compare clinical outcomes among female cancer patients who underwent a conventional early follicular phase-start ovarian stimulation cycle and those who underwent a random-start ovarian stimulation cycle. EVIDENCE REVIEW: A systematic review of the literature was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Medline, Embase.com, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Clinicaltrials.gov databases were searched to identify all original research published in English through July 2020 on the topic of female cancer patients undergoing ovarian stimulation with a random or conventional start. Studies lacking a comparison group or including women who had already undergone chemotherapy at the time of ovarian stimulation were excluded. The primary author assessed all identified article titles and abstracts, and two independent reviewers assessed full-text articles and extracted data. A meta-analysis with a random-effects model was used to calculate weighted mean differences (WMDs) for outcomes of interest. The primary outcome was the number of mature (meiosis II) oocytes retrieved. Secondary outcomes included duration of stimulation, total dose of gonadotropins, total number of oocytes retrieved, fertilization rate, and number of embryos or zygotes cryopreserved. RESULTS: A total of 446 articles were screened, and 9 full-text articles (all retrospective cohort or prospective observational) were included for review. Additionally, pooled primary retrospective data from two institutions were included. In total, data from 10 studies including 1653 women were reviewed. Five studies reported the number of embryos cryopreserved, and four reported fertilization rates. Random-start cycles were slightly longer (WMD 0.57 days, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.0-1.14 days) and used more total gonadotropins (WMD 248.8 international units, 95 % CI 57.24-440.40) than conventional-start cycles. However, there were no differences in number of mature oocytes retrieved (WMD 0.41 oocytes, 95 % CI -0.84-1.66), number of total oocytes retrieved (WMD 0.90 oocytes, 95 % CI -0.21-2.02), fertilization rates (WMD -0.12, 95 % CI -1.22-0.98), or number of embryos cryopreserved (WMD 0.12 embryos, 95 %CI -0.98-1.22) between random-start and conventional-start cycles. All outcomes except for the parameter "total oocytes retrieved" yielded an I2 of over 50 %, indicating substantial heterogeneity between studies. CONCLUSION(S): Although random-start cycles may entail a longer duration of stimulation and use more total gonadotropins than conventional-start cycles, the absolute differences are small and likely do not significantly affect treatment costs. The similar numbers of mature oocytes retrieved, fertilization rates, and number of embryos cryopreserved in the two start-types suggest that they do not differ in any clinically important ways. Given that random-start cycles can be initiated quickly, they may help facilitate fertility preservation for cancer patients.

Pregnancy confirmed after controlled ovarian stimulation for infertility: A case report.

RATIONAL: Induction of ovarian stimulation by use of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) long protocol in the luteal phase is a common practice and results in stable pregnancy and live births; it is often used in patients with normal ovarian function. Some patients with normal ovulation may be pregnant before ovulation induction, which can be easily confirmed by asking the patient about cessation of menstruation. However, some pregnancy complications may cause vaginal bleeding along with normal menstrual blood loss; in such a situation, hormone levels can often mirror that seen in pituitary down-regulation and the value of ß-HCG may be less than 5 mIU/mL. Under these conditions, the physician might start the cycle of ovarian stimulation. During ovarian stimulation, the increase in ß-HCG can cause premature luteinization and follicle maturation disorder, and poor embryo quality, which can easily be overlooked. In this study, we report a case of pregnancy at the end of controlled ovarian stimulation induced by GnRHa long protocol in the luteal phase, followed by follicle maturation disorder and poor embryo quality. This case provided a reference and served as a cautionary note that could perhaps obviate occurrence of similar cases. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 30-year-old woman with a diagnosis of unexplained infertility was scheduled for in vitro fertilization embryo culture (IVF) at our clinic. Pregnancy was confirmed at the end of controlled ovarian stimulation, which was followed by follicular maturation disorder and poor embryo quality. DIAGNOSIS: The patient with a diagnosis of unexplained infertility was scheduled for IVF at our clinic. INTERVENTIONS: Oocyte retrieval was still arranged for her after confirmation of pregnancy. As per the ß-HCG level and the trans-vaginal ultrasound examination findings, we considered 2 possibilities: an adverse intrauterine pregnancy or extra-uterine pregnancy. Therefore, we decided to terminate the pregnancy; hence, 50 mg/d of mifepristone was given for 2 days, combined with 200 µg misoprostol. OUTCOMES: Elevated ß-HCG level had an adverse effect on maturation and fertilization of oocytes, and even embryo quality. CONCLUSION: Once pregnancy is confirmed, ovulation induction should be terminated as soon as possible.

Effects of using letrozole in combination with the GnRH antagonist protocol for patients with poor ovarian response: A meta-analysis.

This meta-analysis aimed to compare the outcomes of the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist/letrozole protocol with those of the conventional GnRH antagonist protocol for poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI). We searched for relevant articles in PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar, and retrieved 452 records. Eventually, we selected five eligible trials with data for 564 patients characterized as poor ovarian responders. Our meta-analysis revealed that the clinical pregnancy rate (per cycle) with administration of letrozole might be a higher than that in the control groups (risk rate [RR]: 1.57, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.00-2.44, p = 0.05). .Moreover,it indicated that the total dose of gonadotrophin was significantly decreased with the administration of letrozole compared to control groups(mean difference [MD]: -529.37, 95% CI: -1207.45 to -111.25, p = 0.001),.However, there was no statistical difference in the number of retrieved oocytes(MD: 0.59, 95% CI: -0.36-1.54, p = 0.22), cycle cancelation rate (RR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.58-1.12, p = 0.20), or estradiol concentration on the day of HCG administration(MD: -28.19, 95% CI: -77.71-21.33, p = 0.26) in the presence or absence of letrozole combination in the GnRH antagonist protocol. In conclusion, letrozole administration might improve clinical pregnancy rate in conventional GnRH antagonist protocol for poor responders. Moreover, letrozole co-treatment aslo can reduce the economic burden of poor responders during the GnRH antagonist cycle. Nevertheless, large-scale and multi-center randomized controlled trials are needed to further evaluate the efficacy of adjunctive letrozole administration in the GnRH antagonist protocol.

The Role of Traditional Chinese Formula Ding-Kun Pill (DKP) in Expected Poor Ovarian Response Women (POSEIDON Group 4) Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization-Embryo Transfer: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

Objective: The primary objective of the study was to assess traditional Chinese formula DKP supplementation in terms of efficacy and safety on reproductive outcomes of expected poor ovarian responder (POR, POSEIDON Group 4) undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET). Design Setting and Participants: Women eligible for IVF-ET were invited to participate in this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, superiority trial at academic fertility centers of ten public hospitals in Chinese Mainland. A total of 462 patients (35-44 years) equally divided between DKP and placebo groups with antral follicle count (AFC) <5 or anti-müllerian hormone (AMH) <1.2 ng/ml were randomized. Interventions: All participants were given DKP or 7 g placebo twice daily on the previous menstrual cycle day 5 until oocyte retrieval, which took approximately 5 to 6 weeks. Main Outcome Measure: The primary outcome was the ongoing pregnancy defined as more than 20 gestational weeks of an intrauterine living fetus confirmed by pelvic ultrasonography. Results: Demographic characteristics were equally distributed between the study populations. Intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis revealed that ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR) was not significantly different between DKP and placebo groups [26.4% (61/231) versus 24.2% (56/231); relative risk (RR) 1.09, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.80 to 1.49, P = 0.593]. No significant differences between groups were observed for the secondary outcomes. The additional per protocol (PP) analysis was in line with ITT results: OPR in DKP group was 27.2% (61/224) versus 24.1% (55/228) in placebo group [RR 1.13, 95%CI (0.82 to 1.55), P = 0.449]. After subgroup analysis the findings concluded that POR population of 35-37 years had a significantly higher OPR after 5-6 weeks of oral DKP (41.8%, 33/79) versus placebo (25.4%, 18/71) [RR 1.65, 95% CI (1.02 to 2.65), P = 0.034, P for interaction = 0.028]. Conclusion: This well-designed randomized controlled trial (RCT) offers new high-quality evidence to supplement existing retrospective literature concerning DKP performance in expected PORs. DKP could be recommended as a safe and natural remedy for expected PORs (aged 35-37 years) who fulfill the POSEIDON group 4 criteria. However, additional interventional clinical studies are undoubtedly required to be conducted in the future to validate this hypothesis. Clinical Trial Registration: www.chictr.org.cn, identifier ChiCTR1900026614.

Double daily doses of cetrorelix may raise follicular phase progesterone more compared to single doses in poor ovarian response patients.

PURPOSE: There is evidence that follicular phase progesterone rise [FPPR] adversely affects fresh in vitro fertilization [IVF] cycles. A single daily dose of cetrorelix has been used to prevent early luteinizing Hormone (LH) surge. We speculated that doubling the daily dose might have a positive effect in patients who have early LH surges despite receiving the single daily dose treatment. However, a double daily dose of cetrorelix seems to cause FPPR in poor ovarian response (POR) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: On human chorionic gonadotropin [hCG] injection days, the progesterone levels of POR patients who received a single daily dose of cetrorelix (group 1, n = 59) were compared with progesterone levels of the patients who received a double daily dose of cetrorelix (group 2, n = 75). The two groups had statistically similar demographic data. The patients who had FPPR were detected, and a comparison of progesterone levels, using 0.8, 1.0, and 1.2 [ng/mL] of progesterone as cut-off levels, was made between patients of both groups. RESULTS: FPPR patients in group 2 had significantly higher progesterone levels during hCG day, contrary to expectations. When progesterone cut-off levels of 0.8, 1.0, and 1.2 [ng/mL] were used for group 1 patients, 15.3%, 13.6%, and 6.8% of the patients developed FPPR, respectively When the progesterone cut-off levels of 0.8, 1.0, and 1.2 [ng/mL] were used for group 2, the results detected were 45.3%, 30.7%, and 21.3%, respectively. A significant statistical difference in progesterone levels was observed between the groups. CONCLUSION: While the double daily dose of cetrorelix was initially thought to more effectively suppress early LH rise by some authors, we have seen that it increases the FPPR more when compared to a single daily dose regime. We suggest using frozen cycles instead of fresh cycles in order to have better endometrial receptivity in patients who seem to benefit from higher daily doses of cetrorelix.

Optimising Follicular Development, Pituitary Suppression, Triggering and Luteal Phase Support During Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Delphi Consensus.

Background: A Delphi consensus was conducted to evaluate global expert opinions on key aspects of assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment. Methods: Ten experts plus the Scientific Coordinator discussed and amended statements plus supporting references proposed by the Scientific Coordinator. The statements were distributed via an online survey to 35 experts, who voted on their level of agreement or disagreement with each statement. Consensus was reached if the proportion of participants agreeing or disagreeing with a statement was >66%. Results: Eighteen statements were developed. All statements reached consensus and the most relevant are summarised here. (1) Follicular development and stimulation with gonadotropins (n = 9 statements): Recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone (r-hFSH) alone is sufficient for follicular development in normogonadotropic patients aged <35 years. Oocyte number and live birth rate are strongly correlated; there is a positive linear correlation with cumulative live birth rate. Different r-hFSH preparations have identical polypeptide chains but different glycosylation patterns, affecting the biospecific activity of r-hFSH. r-hFSH plus recombinant human LH (r-hFSH:r-hLH) demonstrates improved pregnancy rates and cost efficacy versus human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) in patients with severe FSH and LH deficiency. (2) Pituitary suppression (n = 2 statements): Gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists are associated with lower rates of any grade ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and cycle cancellation versus GnRH agonists. (3) Final oocyte maturation triggering (n=4 statements): Human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) represents the gold standard in fresh cycles. The efficacy of hCG triggering for frozen transfers in modified natural cycles is controversial compared with LH peak monitoring. Current evidence supports significantly higher pregnancy rates with hCG + GnRH agonist versus hCG alone, but further evidence is needed. GnRH agonist trigger, in GnRH antagonist protocol, is recommended for final oocyte maturation in women at risk of OHSS. (4) Luteal-phase support (n = 3 statements): Vaginal progesterone therapy represents the gold standard for luteal-phase support. Conclusions: This Delphi consensus provides a real-world clinical perspective on the specific approaches during the key steps of ART treatment from a diverse group of international experts. Additional guidance from clinicians on ART strategies could complement guidelines and policies, and may help to further improve treatment outcomes.