Centrifugal lipodystrophy on a spectrum with lupus erythematosus panniculitis in children and efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine: A clinicopathological study.

This study aimed to investigate the relationship between centrifugal lipodystrophy (CLD) and lupus erythematosus panniculitis (LEP), and the efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) for treating CLD in children. A total of 29 cases clinically diagnosed as CLD (n = 24) and CLD/LEP overlap (n = 5) were enrolled and all were confirmed by skin biopsies of CLD and LEP. The clinicopathological findings, clinical outcomes, and prognosis with the treatment of HCQ between CLD and LEP were compared. All 29 cases (male: female = 1:1.6; median age at onset: 3 years) had cutaneous lesions of centrifugally expanding lipoatrophy, of which five cases overlapped with LEP lesions presented as erythematous indurated plaque (n = 2), subcutaneous nodules (n = 2) and alopecia along Blaschko's lines (n = 1). Antinuclear antibodies were found in six (25.0%) CLD and two (40.0%) overlapped patients (p = 0.597). Histopathologically, of the 24 cases of CLD, 14 (58.5%) exhibited subcutis loss or mild lobular inflammation. Ten (41.7%) cases displayed lobular panniculitis with moderate to dense lymphohistiocytic infiltrate and plasma cells, similar to the five cases of overlap. Small clusters of CD123 positive plasmacytoid dendritic cells were found in 62.5% (5/8) of CLD and 66.7% (2/3) of overlap cases (p > 0.99). HCQ (5 mg/kg/d) treatment showed improvement in 91.3% (21/23) of CLD and all overlap cases, including four cases unresponsive to previous oral glucocorticosteroid treatment. Our findings suggested that CLD and LEP represent a spectrum within the same disease. HCQ (5 mg/kg/d) was effective and safe for treating CLD (age >1.5 years), and early treatment and a regular long-term follow-up are essential.

Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease preceded by lupus erythematosus panniculitis: do these findings together herald the onset of systemic lupus erythematosus?

Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease (KFD), also known as histiocytic necrotizing lymphadenitis, is a rare disorder that must be distinguished from systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Although a minority of patients with KFD develop SLE, most patients have a self-limited disease. Importantly, KFD can have skin manifestations resembling cutaneous lupus. Therefore, the diagnosis of SLE should be predicated on a complete rheumatologic workup and not on the constellation of skin disease and lymphadenitis. Nonetheless, as our exceedingly rare case illustrates, patients who do not initially meet diagnostic criteria for SLE require dermatologic follow-up. We present a young adult woman who had a remote history of KFD and later presented with combined features of discoid lupus and lupus erythematosus panniculitis (LEP). On subsequent rheumatologic workup, she fulfilled criteria for SLE. We discuss the differential diagnosis of both KFD and LEP and emphasize how strong communication among dermatologists and other healthcare providers is essential in the management of patients with KFD.

Utility of CD123 immunohistochemistry in differentiating lupus erythematosus from cutaneous T cell lymphoma.

AIMS: Histopathological overlap between lupus erythematosus and certain types of cutaneous T cell lymphoma (CTCL) is well documented. CD123+ plasmacytoid dendritic cells (PDCs) are typically increased in lupus erythematosus, but have not been well studied in CTCL. We aimed to compare CD123 immunostaining and histopathological features in these conditions. METHODS AND RESULTS: Skin biopsies of cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE, n = 18), lupus erythematosus panniculitis (LEP, n = 17), mycosis fungoides (MF, n = 25) and subcutaneous panniculitis-like T cell lymphoma (SPTCL, n = 9) were retrospectively reviewed and immunostained with CD123. Percentage, distribution and clustering of CD123+ cells were compared between CLE and MF and between LEP and SPTCL using χ2 and two-tailed t-tests. A higher percentage of CD123+ cells was observed in CLE than MF (P < 0.01), more frequently comprising ≥20% of the entire infiltrate (P < 0.01) and forming clusters (P < 0.01). Similarly, LEP showed a higher percentage of CD123+ cells than SPTCL (P = 0.01), more frequently comprising ≥20% of the infiltrate (P = 0.04) and forming clusters (P = 0.01). Basal vacuolar change or dyskeratosis was observed in all CLE cases and in 48% cases of MF cases (P = 0.05). Plasma cells were readily identified in 76% cases of LEP but in none of the SPTCL cases (P = 0.01). Adipocyte rimming by lymphocytes, hyaline fat necrosis and fibrinoid/grungy necrosis did not significantly differ between LEP and SPTCL. Dermal mucin also failed to distinguish between groups. CONCLUSIONS: CD123 immunostaining is helpful in differentiating CLE from MF and LEP from SPTCL, but should be interpreted in conjunction with clinicopathological features and other ancillary studies to ensure accurate diagnosis.

Subcutaneous Panniculitis-Like T-Cell Lymphoma Versus Lupus Erythematosus Panniculitis: Distinction by Means of the Periadipocytic Cell Proliferation Index.

The distinction between subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma (SPTCL) and lupus erythematosus (LE) panniculitis is remarkably challenging. Rimming by lymphocytes with an elevated Ki-67 cell proliferation index has been forwarded as a potential diagnostic finding in biopsies of SPTCL but has not been rigorously compared with biopsies from patients with LE panniculitis. Nineteen and 17 examples of SPTCL and LE panniculitis, respectively, were evaluated for periadipocytic rimming by lymphocytes expressing Ki-67, CD8, and ßF1 and for attributes associated with LE, including clusters of CD123-positive cells. The identification of periadiopocytic rimming using Ki-67, CD8, and ßF1 held sensitivity of 79%, 100%, and 89.5% and specificity of 100%, 52.9%, and 88.2%, respectively (P < 0.01). CD123-positive cells were in both disorders. LE-like histopathology was commonly encountered in SPTCL. In conclusion, an elevated Ki-67 cell proliferation index with rimming is useful for distinguishing SPTCL from LE panniculitis. Notably, many features of LE panniculitis can also be encountered in SPTCL.

Orbital T-cell lymphoma versus lupus panniculitits: a T-cell-mediated spectrum of orbital lymphoproliferative disease.

This is a case description of a single male patient found to have T-cell-mediated inflammation and lymphoproliferation of the orbit. Chronic T-cell-mediated inflammatory disease can pose a diagnostic challenge particularly in its differentiation from a neoplastic process. The histopathology in this case demonstrated features of both lupus erythematosus panniculitis and features of orbital T-cell lymphoma. While both are rare, lupus erythematosus panniculitis of the orbit is even more exceptional; this patient's indolent, chronic relapsing course distinguished itself from the typical aggression of orbital T-cell lymphoma. We believe this rare case may actually represent an example of a newly described disease spectrum that incorporates lupus erythematosus panniculitis as well as subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma.

Subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma responsive to combination therapy with methotrexate and corticosteroids.

Subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma (SPTCL) is a rare condition that falls underneath the umbrella of primary cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCLs). SPTCL can be very difficult to diagnose as it may mimic other subtypes of CTCL, such as γ/δ T-cell lymphoma (TCL), or other forms of panniculitis. Confirmation of diagnosis often requires immunohistochemical analysis and is essential for proper prognosis and therapeutic management. Herein, we present a case of SPTCL that mimicked lupus panniculitis and was successfully treated with prednisone taper and methotrexate.

Immunohistochemistry reveals an increased proportion of MYC-positive cells in subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma compared with lupus panniculitis.

BACKGROUND: Subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma (SPTCL) is a malignant primary cutaneous T-cell lymphoma that shares significant clinical, histopathologic and immunophenotypic overlap with lupus erythematosus panniculitis (LEP). METHODS: We performed immunohistochemistry for the MYC oncoprotein on 23 cases of SPTCL (1 CD8 negative) and 12 cases of LEP to evaluate if there are quantitative or qualitative differences in protein expression of this marker in these entities. RESULTS: In SPTCL cases, the percentage of all cells that were c-Myc positive ranged from 0.8% to 16%, with a mean of 5.0% and a median of 4.4%. In contrast, in the LEP cases, the percentage of c-Myc-positive cells in the cases ranged from 0.34% to 3.7%, averaged 1.4% and the median was 0.8%. The difference between the means of these 2 diagnostic categories was statistically significant. Fluorescence in situ hybridization performed on 4 cases of SPTCL with a relatively high level of MYC immunohistochemical staining, however, failed to demonstrate evidence of MYC rearrangement or amplification. CONCLUSIONS: Our work demonstrates that MYC expression levels differ between these 2 histologic mimics and suggests that this important oncoprotein may play a role in the pathogenesis of SPTCL.

Tumid lupus: An unexpected diagnosis for the otolaryngologist.

Tumid lupus is an uncommon variant of lupus erythematosus. Patients present with subcutaneous lesions. Ophthalmic literature reports disease manifestation as orbital inflammation. Autoimmune serology is often negative. Without a high index of suspicion, the diagnosis is easily overlooked delaying treatment. Tumid lupus is not significantly discussed in the Otolaryngologic literature. Here we present a Case Report of a male who initially presented to Ophthalmology with unilateral orbital complaint of eyelid puffiness. Orbital biopsy and subsequent biopsy of his submental skin lesions ultimately led to this unexpected diagnosis. We discuss the method to diagnose tumid lupus including representative histopathologic findings.

Inflammatory leg nodules: A clinical and investigational study.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory leg nodules are a diagnostically challenging group of dermatoses with limited tools for diagnosis. Considerable overlapping patterns exist despite their distinct clinical and histological features. We attempted to understand if undertaking investigations and studying the clinical course and treatment response can help in differentiating these dermatoses. METHODS: Forty-three patients presenting with inflammatory leg nodules underwent a series of investigations apart from histopathology. The patients were treated as per the final histological diagnosis and observed for response to treatment and followed up to evaluate the clinical course. RESULTS: There was considerable overlap in the investigations done among various dermatoses. These included elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), Mantoux test and antistreptolysin- O (ASLO) titres in the majority of patients while a few had abnormal findings on chest X-ray, CT scan of the chest and doppler ultrasonography of the legs. About 86% of patients with erythema nodosum, 50% with erythema induratum, 57% with cutaneous medium vessel vasculitis and 93% with unclassified panniculitis responded to non-steroidal non-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) alone or had spontaneously resolved with only post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation. Other patients required specific treatment with immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory agents. CONCLUSIONS: There is considerable overlap in dermatoses manifesting as inflammatory leg nodules on investigations, treatment received and response to treatment. To categorize them better into distinct entities, this group of dermatoses may require long-term follow-up of the clinical course and response to treatment, repeated investigations especially histopathology during different phases of evolution and progression of disease.

The natural history of pediatric-onset discoid lupus erythematosus.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) is rare. The risk of progression to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is uncertain. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the risk of progression of pediatric DLE to SLE and to characterize its phenotype. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of 40 patients with DLE. RESULTS: Six (15%) of 40 patients presented with DLE as a manifestation of concurrent SLE. Of the remaining 34, 9 (26%) eventually met SLE criteria and 15 (44%) developed laboratory abnormalities without meeting SLE criteria. Only 10 (29%) maintained skin-limited disease. The average age at progression to SLE was 11 years, with greatest risk in the first year after DLE diagnosis. Most (89%) patients with SLE met diagnostic criteria with mucocutaneous disease (discoid lesions, malar rash, oral and nasal ulcers, photosensitivity), positive antibodies, and/or cytopenia without developing end-organ damage over 5 years of median follow-up. LIMITATIONS: The study was retrospective. CONCLUSIONS: In pediatric patients, DLE carries a significant risk of progression to SLE but may predict a milder phenotype of systemic disease. All patients require careful monitoring for SLE, particularly within the first year of diagnosis.

[Juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus with unusual manifestation of lupus-associated panniculitis]. / Juveniler systemischer Lupus erythematodes mit der ungewöhnlichen Manifestation einer Lupus-assoziierten Pannikulitis.

Juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus (JSLE) is a rare multisystem autoimmune disease with broad heterogeneity of clinical manifestations. Diagnosing JSLE is often very challenging. This life-threatening, unpredictable, and relapsing disease, which may affect various organ systems, requires interdisciplinary, lifelong care. Here, we report the case of a 13-year-old patient with JSLE suffering from recurrent arthralgia, lupus panniculitis, and rashes that were successfully treated with hydroxychloroquine and prednisolone.

Subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma and lupus erythematosus profundus: a diagnostic dilemma.

A white Caucasian woman in her 30s presented with an indurated lesion on her right upper arm. Panniculitis was clinically suspected. Antinuclear antibody testing was positive but incisional biopsy showed subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma (SPTCL), although with some unusual features more in keeping with lupus. Initial treatment was with oral prednisolone and radiotherapy but with only partial response. A second biopsy was taken from an area of presumed residual disease. This displayed histological features that were much more typical of lupus erythematosus profundus (LEP) but with tiny foci suggesting concomitant microscopic areas of SPTCL. Immunofluorescence for IgM was positive. This case highlights the rare occurrence of a patient with overlapping clinical and pathological features of SCPTL and LEP. It emphasises the need for close clinicopathological correlation in the workup of patients with suspected panniculitis and the importance of careful pathological examination for features of both diseases.

The presence of clusters of plasmacytoid dendritic cells is a helpful feature for differentiating lupus panniculitis from subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma.

AIMS: Both lupus panniculitis (LP) and subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma (SPTCL) are characterized by subcutaneous lobular lymphocytic infiltrates, and they are sometimes difficult to differentiate. Recently, plasmacytoid dendritic cells (PDCs) were found to be present in various types of cutaneous lupus erythematosus lesions, including LP, and are supposed to play important pathogenetic roles. The aim of this study was to investigate whether PDCs are differentially present in these two diseases and can be utilized to differentiate them. Conventional histopathological features were also compared. METHODS AND RESULTS: Initial biopsies from 21 LP and 11 SPTCL patients were analysed. Our results showed that the presence of lymphoid follicles, dermal mucin deposition and lack of moderate to marked nuclear atypia or adipocyte rimming were more suggestive of LP. Several distinct patterns of fat necrosis, i.e. hyaline/lipomembranous and fibrinoid/coagulative in LP and SPTCL, respectively, were also diagnostically useful. Also, clusters of PDCs were characteristically seen in LP lesions (17/21, 81%) but not in SPTCL lesions (2/11, 18.2%). In LP lesions, but not in SPTCL lesions, the presence of epidermal interface change correlated perfectly with the presence of PDCs in the papillary dermis. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the presence of clusters of PDCs and certain histological features are helpful for the differential diagnosis.

IRF8 in Conjunction With CD123 and CD20 to Distinguish Lupus Erythematosus Panniculitis From Subcutaneous Panniculitis-like T-Cell Lymphoma.

Distinguishing lupus erythematosus panniculitis (LEP) from subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma (SPTCL) is a diagnostic challenge with important clinical implications. Immunohistochemical expression of interferon regulatory factor 8 (IRF8) has been shown to highlight cells with plasmacytoid dendritic cell differentiation. Considering that the presence of plasmacytoid dendritic cells highlighted by CD123 immunolabeling is a well-described feature that supports LEP over SPTCL, we hypothesized that IRF8 immunohistochemistry can be used as a diagnostic test to improve accuracy in differentiating LEP from SPTCL. In this study, we assessed the expression of IRF8, CD123, and CD20 in 35 cutaneous biopsies from 31 distinct patients, which included 22 cases of LEP and 13 cases of SPTCL. We found that clusters of IRF8-positive cells within the dermis, and away from subcutaneous fat, could discriminate LEP from SPTCL ( P =0.005). Similarly, CD123-positive clusters in any location were observed in LEP but absent in all cases of SPTCL. In addition, we found that dermal CD20-predominant lymphoid aggregates could help discriminate LEP from SPTCL ( P =0.022). As individual assays, IRF8, CD123, and CD20 were highly specific (100%, 100%, and 92%, respectively) though poorly sensitive (45%, 29%, and 50%, respectively). However, a panel combining IRF8, CD123, and CD20, with at least 1 positive marker was more accurate than any individual marker by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Our study provides a rationale for potentially including IRF8 as part of an immunohistochemical panel composed of other currently available markers used to differentiate LEP from SPTCL.

[Characteristics of the course of lupus erythematosus panniculitis in a retrospective analysis of 17 patients]. / A lupus erythematosus panniculitis lefolyásának jellegzetességei 17 betegünk retrospektív vizsgálata alapján.

INTRODUCTION: Lupus erythematous panniculitis (LEP) is a rare type of chronic cutaneous lupus erythematous. Clinical characteristics are tender, subcutaneous nodules, erythematous plaques. Disfigurement of face and body might develop which affects the patient's quality of life. LEP can be the first sign of systemic lupus erythematous (SLE). OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to review the clinicopathological characteristics and the course of LEP through our own patients. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical records of 17 LEP patients at Semmelweis University's Department of Dermatology, Venerology and Dermatooncology between 2000 and 2022. RESULTS: The male : female ratio was 1 : 16, average age was 37.8 years. Lesion localisations were proximal lower (8/17) and upper extremities (7/17), face (4/17), breast (3/17), chest (2/17), buttocks (2/17), back (1/17) and distal lower extremity (1/17). Lesion morphologies were nodules (11/17), plaques (7/17), lipoatrophy (4/17), ulceration (3/17), calcification (1/17). Discoid changes covered in 6 cases. In 10 cases, systemic symptoms were observed (arthritis (4/17), haematological (5/17), renal (2/17), anti-phospholipid syndrome (2/17). 7 patients fulfilled the EULAR/ACR criteria for SLE. Histology showed mixed type panniculitis in 8, lobular in 3 cases. Average time until diagnosis was 24.3 months. Among all our SLE patients, skin symptoms regressed following systemic immunosuppressive treatment. LEP patients with only skin manifestation were often resistant for the therapy of cutaneous lupus erythematous. CONCLUSION: The diagnosis of LEP often takes months or years. Wider knowledge of LEP would shorten the time to diagnosis, preventing disfigurement and possible damage of internal organs. Based on our observations, LEP without SLE might be treated with early immunosuppression. Orv Hetil. 2023; 164(5): 172-178.

Orbital Mass as the Only Presenting Sign with Overlapping Features of Lupus Erythematosus Panniculitis and Subcutaneous Panniculitis-Like T-Cell Lymphoma.

PURPOSE: Even though subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma (SPTCL) and lupus erythematosus panniculitis (LEP) are two separate entities, recently they were claimed to represent two ends of a spectrum of T-cell-mediated orbital lymphoproliferative diseases. METHODS: A 78-year-old woman presented with a 1-month history of right-sided periorbital swelling and redness. There was a palpable mass in the medial right lower eyelid with restriction of upward and lateral gaze. MRI revealed a 14 × 7 mm hypointense lesion in the anteromedial orbit. RESULTS: The systemic and ocular findings, orbital biopsy with histopathology and immunochemistry showed overlapping features of LEP and SPTCL. The patient was consulted with rheumatology and hematology, and the physicians arrived at a consensus that the patient existed in the above-mentioned disease spectrum. She was started on systemic immunosuppressive treatment and her clinical findings improved substantially. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report of a patient, who presented with orbital mass causing vision loss and gaze restriction that had overlapping clinical and histopathologic features of LEP and SPTCL consistent with this novel disease spectrum, in the literature.

Panniculitic primary cutaneous gamma delta T-cell lymphoma with concomitant features of autoimmune disease emphasizing a pathophysiologic continuum of lupus profundus with the panniculitic T cell lymphomas.

Certain T-cell lymphomas exhibit unique homing properties of the neoplastic lymphocytes for the subcutaneous fat. There are two primary forms of subcutaneous panniculitic lymphomas of T-cell origin. One falls under the designation of primary cutaneous gamma-delta T-cell lymphomas (PGD-TCL) whereby there is dominant involvement of the fat defininng a panniculitic form of PGD-TCL. The neoplastic cells are of the gamma-delta subset and are either double negative for CD4 and CD8 and/or can express CD8. They often have an aggressive clinical course. The other form of panniculitic T-cell lymphoma falls under the designation of subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma (SPTCL). It represents a subcutaneous lymphoma derived from CD8+ T cells of the alpha-beta subset and typically has an indolent course. These two forms of panniculitic T-cell lymphoma exhibit overlapping histologic features with lupus profundus (LP), a putative form of panniculitic T-cell dyscrasia. We present three cases of PGD-TCL of the fat in the setting of lupus erythematosus (LE) (two cases) and dermatomyositis (DM) (one case), respectively. There were concurrent features of LE and DM in their lymphoma biopsies in two cases while a prior biopsy in one was interpreted as LP. In this latter case, the LP diagnosis presaged the diagnosis of panniculitic PGD-TCL by three years. One patient diagnosed with panniculitic PGD-TCL had hemophagocytic syndrome after developing a lupus-like complex including certain supportive serologies such as antibodies to double-stranded DNA following initiation of statin therapy. The second patient presented with PGD-TCL and concomitant features of anti-nuclear matrix 2 (NXP2) DM. The third patient presented in 2003 with LP and overlying skin features of acute LE, initially responding to Plaquenil, and then four years later was diagnosed with PGD-TCL heralded by Plaquenil treatment resistance. Two of the patients died of their lymphoma. All biopsies showed a characteristic histopathology of PGD-TCL. In two cases, the PGD-TCL was associated with overlying LE-cutaneous findings; another case had skin changes of lymphocyte-rich DM. In two cases, the MXA stain was strikingly positive, the surrogate type I interferon marker that is typically upregulated in biopsies of LE and DM. There are eight prior reported cases describing SPTCL with concomitant cutaneous changes of LE. In six cases there was an established history of LE, including LP responding initially to Plaquenil, similar to one of our cases. In the context of SPTCL or panniculitic PGD-TCL, panniculitic T-cell lymphomas can be associated with concomitant clinical and histologic features of LE or DM, including an upregulated type I interferon signature. Identifying histologic features associated with either of these prototypic autoimmune conditions should not be considered exclusionary to diagnosing any panniculitic T-cell lymphoma. A clinical, histomorphologic, and pathophysiologic continuum exists with LP, SPTCL and panniculitic PGD-TCL.

Subcutaneous Panniculitis-like T-cell Lymphoma with a HAVCR2 Mutation Diagnosed after 10 Years of Treatment with Glucocorticoids and Cyclosporine as Lupus Panniculitis.

Subcutaneous panniculitis-like T cell lymphoma (SPTCL) is a very rare cutaneous T cell lymphoma that has been reported to be associated with autoimmune disorders but is most commonly associated with systemic lupus erythematosus. We herein report a 26-year-old man thought to have lupus panniculitis (LP) treated for 10 years with corticosteroids and cyclosporine. After several relapses with panniculitis, he was finally diagnosed with SPTCL, which was confirmed to have a HAVCR2 mutation for p.Tyr82Cys. We emphasize that rheumatologists should be aware of the possibility of SPTCL, despite its rare appearance, when making a diagnosis of LP or when encountering clinical manifestations that are not consistent with LP.

A case of lupus erythematosus profundus with multiple arc-shaped erythematous plaques on the scalp and a review of the literature.

A 26-year-old Japanese female presented to us with a 2-year history of multiple arc-shaped erythematous lesions on her scalp and the right side of her forehead. Histopathological examination of two of the lesions showed lobular and septal panniculitis with deposits of IgG in the basement membrane zone. We diagnosed the case as lupus erythematosus profundus, and successfully treated her with 20 mg/day prednisolone. To our knowledge, there has been only one previously reported case of lupus erythematosus profundus with annular-shaped erythematous lesions and six cases with linear configuration.