T2 Mapping of Patellar Cartilage After a Single First-Time Episode of Traumatic Lateral Patellar Dislocation.

BACKGROUND: In most cases, lateral patellar dislocation (LPD) is accompanied by chondral injury and may initiate gradual degeneration of patellar cartilage, which might be detected with a T2 mapping, a well-established method for cartilage lesions assessment. PURPOSE: To examine short-term consequences of single first-time LPD in teenagers by T2 mapping of the patellar-cartilage state. STUDY TYPE: Prospective. POPULATION: 95 patients (mean age: 15.1 ± 2.3; male/female: 46/49) with first-time, complete, traumatic LPD and 51 healthy controls (mean age: 14.7 ± 2.2, male/female: 29/22). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3.0 T; axial T2 mapping acquired using a 2D turbo spin-echo sequence. ASSESSMENT: MRI examination was conducted 2-4 months after first LPD. T2 values were calculated in manually segmented cartilage area via averaging over three middle level slices in six cartilage regions: deep, intermediate, superficial layers, and medial lateral parts. STATISTICAL TESTS: ANOVA analysis with Tukey's multiple comparison test, one-vs.-rest logistic regression analysis. The threshold of significance was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: In lateral patellar cartilage, a significant increase in T2 values was found in deep and intermediate layers in both patient groups with mild (deep: 34.7 vs. 31.3 msec, intermediate: 38.7 vs. 34.6 msec, effect size = 0.55) and severe (34.8 vs. 31.3 msec, 39.1 vs. 34.6 msec, 0.55) LPD consequences as compared to controls. In the medial facet, only severe cartilage damage showed significant prolongation of T2 times in the deep layer (34.3 vs. 30.7 msec, 0.55). No significant changes in T2 values were found in the lateral superficial layer (P = 0.99), whereas mild chondromalacia resulted in a significant decrease of T2 in the medial superficial layer (41.0 vs. 43.8 msec, 0.55). DATA CONCLUSION: The study revealed substantial difference in T2 changes after LPD between medial and lateral areas of patellar cartilage. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2.

Treatment of Patellofemoral Instability and Chondral Lesions.

Lateral patellar instability is one of the most common knee disorders among adolescents. Numerous anthropometric features, including trochlear dysplasia, patella alta, high tibial tubercle-to-trochlear groove distance, and coronal and rotational plane malalignment, are considered primary risk factors for patellar dislocation, and the understanding of their complex interplay is continuously evolving. Because of the multifactorial nature of patellar instability, there is a lack of consensus regarding many aspects of surgical intervention. Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction is considered to be the essential procedure in preventing recurrent instability. However, there is growing interest in addressing underlying anatomic risk factors that contribute to patellar instability. It is important to discuss the diagnosis and management of patellar instability, surgical considerations in medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction, mitigation/correction of anatomic risk factors, and treatment of associated chondral lesions.

Patients who undergo bilateral medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction return to sport at a similar rate as those that undergo unilateral reconstruction.

PURPOSE: Lateral patellar instability is a debilitating condition not only to athletes, but also to a wide range of highly active individuals. Many of these patients experience symptoms bilaterally, though it is unknown how these patients fair with return to sports following a second medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the rate of return to sport following bilateral MPFLR compared to a unilateral comparison group. METHODS: Patients who underwent primary MPFLR with minimum 2-year follow-up were identified from 2014 to 2020 at an academic center. Those who underwent primary MPFLR of bilateral knees were identified. Pre-injury sport participation and Tegner score, Kujala score, Visual Analog Score (VAS) for pain, satisfaction, and MPFL-Return to Sport after Injury (MPFL-RSI) scale were collected. Bilateral and unilateral MPFLRs were matched in a 1:2 ratio based on age, sex, body mass index, and concomitant tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO). A sub-analysis was performed regarding concomitant TTO. RESULTS: The final cohort consisted of 63 patients, including 21 patients who underwent bilateral MPFLR, matched to 42 unilateral patients at mean follow-up of 47 ± 27 months. Patients who underwent bilateral MPFLR returned to sport at a rate of 62% at a mean of 6.0 ± 2.3 months, compared to a unilateral rate of 72% at 8.1 ± 4.2 months (n.s.). The rate of return to pre-injury level was 43% among bilateral patients and 38% in the unilateral cohort. There were no significant differences in VAS pain, Kujala, current Tegner, satisfaction, and MPFL-RSI scores between cohorts. Approximately half of those (47%) who failed to return to sport cited psychological factors and had significantly lower MPFL-RSI scores (36.6 vs 74.2, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients who underwent bilateral MPFLR returned to sports at a similar rate and level compared to a unilateral comparison group. MPFL-RSI was found to be significantly associated with return to sport. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Management of the first episode of traumatic patellar dislocation: an international survey.

PURPOSE: This international survey aimed to evaluate the potential controversies regarding the management of first patellar dislocation amongst experienced knee surgeries in the treatment of the first episode of patellar dislocation without osteochondral fragments. METHODS: An online survey was conducted from February 2021 to December 2021 to assess the global trend in the diagnosis and management of first-time patellar dislocation without osteochondral fragments. The online survey was accessible on the homepage of the website of the European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy (ESSKA). The questionnaire consisted of multiple-choice questions and was divided into three sections. The first section consisted of eight questions regarding demographic information, professional activity, and responder experience. The second section consisted of 13 questions regarding the approach to a first patellar dislocation (clinical examination, imaging, and rehabilitation). The third section contained 2 questions concerning the relevance of patient characteristics to the therapeutic algorithm (age, sports, and pathoanatomical predisposing risk factors). RESULTS: A total of 438 orthopaedic surgeons worldwide completed the questionnaire. At the first approach to diagnose a first-time patellar dislocation, 251 (57%) of the surgeons requested plain radiographs, and 158 (36%) requested magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In conservatively treated patients, 368 (84%) of the respondents recommended the use of a knee brace. Amongst them, 14 (3%) advocated its use for one week, 75 (17%) for two weeks, 123 (28%) for three weeks, 105 (24%) for four weeks, and 97 (22%) for six weeks. In conservatively treated patients, 215 (49%) of the surgeons recommended load to tolerance, 148 (34%) recommended 30% to 60% of the bodyweight, and 75 (17%) advised against weight-bearing. More than half of the surgeons considered a patient aged less than 35 years practising contact sports to be a candidate for the medial patello-femoral ligament (MPFL) procedure. In addition, a tibial tuberosity to trochlear groove distance (TT-TG) distance of 15 to > 20 mm (for > 75% of the surgeons) and a trochlea types C and D (for > 70% of the surgeons) were considered possible indications for direct surgical management. CONCLUSION: At the first approach to diagnose a first-time patellar dislocation, plain radiographs and MRI should be performed. In conservatively treated patients, most of the surgeons recommend weight-bearing to tolerance and a knee brace during the first four weeks, with range of motion of full extension to 30° during the first 15 days and up to 60° for an additional 15 days. Surgical management should be performed in patients in the second and third decades of life practising contact sports and in those patients who present types C and D trochlea dysplasia and patella alta. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Tibial tubercle to trochlear groove distance versus tibial tubercle to posterior cruciate ligament distance for predicting patellar instability: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: To determine the reliability and diagnostic accuracy of tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance versus tibial tubercle-posterior cruciate ligament (TT-PCL) distance, and to determine cutoff values of these measurements for pathological diagnosis in the context of patellar instability. METHODS: Three databases MEDLINE, PubMed and EMBASE were searched from inception to October 5, 2022 for literature outlining comparisons between TT-TG and TT-PCL in patellar instability patients. The authors adhered to the PRISMA and R-AMSTAR guidelines as well as the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Data on inter-rater and intra-rater reliability, receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve parameters such as area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity, as well as odds ratios, cutoff values for pathological diagnosis and correlations between TT-TG and TT-PCL were recorded. The MINORS score was used for all studies in order to perform a quality assessment of included studies. RESULTS: A total of 23 studies comprising 2839 patients (2922 knees) were included in this review. Inter-rater reliability ranged from 0.71 to 0.98 and 0.55 to 0.99 for TT-TG and TT-PCL, respectively. Intra-rater reliability ranged from 0.74 to 0.99 and 0.88 to 0.98 for TT-TG and TT-PCL, respectively. AUC measuring diagnostic accuracy of patellar instability for TT-TG ranged from 0.80 to 0.84 and 0.58 to 0.76 for TT-PCL. Five studies found TT-TG to have more discriminatory power than TT-PCL at distinguishing patients with patellar instability from patients who do not. Sensitivity and specificity ranged from 21 to 85% and 62 to 100%, respectively, for TT-TG. Sensitivity and specificity ranged from 30 to 76% and 46 to 86%, respectively, for TT-PCL. Odds ratio values ranged from 1.06 to 14.02 for TT-TG and 0.98 to 6.47 for TT-PCL. Proposed cutoff TT-TG and TT-PCL values for predicting patellar instability ranged from 15.0 to 21.4 mm and 19.8 to 28.0 mm, respectively. Eight studies reported significant positive correlations between TT-TG and TT-PCL. CONCLUSION: TT-TG resulted in overall similar reliability, sensitivity and specificity as TT-PCL; however, TT-TG has better diagnostic accuracy than TT-PCL in the context of patellar instability as per AUC and odds ratio values. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction is superior to active rehabilitation in protecting against further patella dislocations.

PURPOSE: Isolated reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL-R) has become the predominant stabilizing procedure in the treatment of recurrent lateral patellar dislocation (LPD). To minimize the risk of re-dislocations, isolated MPFL-R is recommended in patients with no significant trochlea dysplasia and tibial tuberosity trochlear groove distance < 20 mm on computed tomography (CT). Incidentally, these criteria are the same that are used to identify first time LPD patients where conservative treatment is recommended. The purpose of this study was therefore to compare MPFL-R with active rehabilitation for patients with recurrent LPD (RLPD) in absence of the above mentioned underlying anatomical high-risk factors for further patellar dislocations. METHODS: RLPD-patients aged 12-30 without underlying anatomical high-risk factors for further LPD were randomized into treatment either with isolated MPFL-R or active rehabilitation provided and instructed by a physiotherapist. All patients underwent diagnostic arthroscopy for concomitant problems. The main outcome measure was persistent patellar instability at 12 months. Knee function at baseline and 12 months was asses using the following patient reported outcomes measures (PROMS); KOOS, Kujala, Cincinnati knee rating, Lysholm score and Noyes sports activity rating scale. RESULTS: Between 2010 and 2019, 61 patients were included in the study (MPFL-R, N = 30, Controls, N = 31). Persistent patellar instability at 12 months was reported by 13 (41.9%) controls, versus 2 (6.7%) in the MPFL-group (RR 6.3 (95% CI 1.5-25.5). No statistically significant differences in activity level were found between the MPFL-group and the Controls at neither baseline nor follow up. The patients with persistent instability at 12 months did not score significantly lower on any of the PROMs compared to their stable peers, regardless of study group. CONCLUSION: Patients with recurrent patellar dislocations have a six-fold increased risk of persistent patellar instability if treated with active rehabilitation alone, compared to MPFL-R in combination with active rehabilitation, even in the absence of significant anatomical risk factors. Active rehabilitation of the knee without MPFL-R improves patient reported knee function after one year, but does not protect against persistent patellar instability.

Assessment of knee flexor muscles strength in patients with patellar instability and its clinical implications for the non-surgical treatment of patients after first patellar dislocation - pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Biomechanical studies indicate that during outward rotation of the tibia and the valgus knee joint position, the patella is shifted in the lateral direction. After first-time patellar dislocation, the dynamic position of the femur in relation to the tibia plays an important role in joint stability, because the medial stabilizer of the patella (mostly the MPFL) is damaged or inefficient. The most important factor in controlling the rotational movement of the tibia in relation to the thigh are the hamstring muscles. The aim of the study therefore is to determine whether patients with patellar instability have a significant weakness in the knee flexor muscles, which can predispose to recurrent dislocations. This is an important consideration when planning the rehabilitation of patients with first-time patellar dislocation. METHODS: The study enrolled 33 patients with confirmed recurrent patellar dislocation, including six patients with bilateral involvement. In the study group, the hamstring muscles (both sides) were evaluated at velocities of 60 and 180 deg/s for the following parameters: peak torque, torque at 30 degrees of knee flexion, angle of peak torque and peak torque hamstring to quadriceps ratio (H/Q ratio). RESULTS: In the recurrent patellar dislocation group, a statistically significant weakness in knee flexors was observed for both angular velocities compared to age and gender normative data. No such relationship was observed in the control group of heathy subjects. In patients with one-sided dislocation, no differences were found in knee flexors peak torque, torque at 30 degrees of knee flexion, angle of peak torque or H/Q ratio between the healthy and affected limbs for either angular velocity. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with recurrent patellar dislocation, knee flexors strength is decreased significantly in both the unaffected and affected limbs. This may indicate a constitutional weakening of these muscles which can predispose to recurrent dislocations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was retrospectively registered on ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT04838158 ), date of registration; 22/03/2021.

How to Address the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament, Tibial Tubercle, and Articular Cartilage in Patients With Recurrent Patellar Instability.

Patellofemoral instability is a common pathology especially in the adolescent female population.1,2 Prompt diagnosis and management is critical to prevent future episodes of instability as well as to reduce the risk of cartilaginous injury to the patellofemoral articular surface. Initial management of a first-time patellar dislocation has historically been nonsurgical; however, the presence of intra-articular loose bodies or osseocartilaginous injury may require surgical intervention.3,4 More recent evidence has shown patients with specific risk factors such as skeletal immaturity, an incompetent medial soft-tissue sleeve, family history of patellar dislocation, elevated tibial tubercle to trochlear groove distance, patella alta, and high-grade trochlear dysplasia experience high rates of re-dislocation after initial nonsurgical management.4-9 Based on this, the provider needs to consider these risk factors and the possibility of initial surgical management in these patient populations following a first-time patellar dislocation. Surgical options for management of patellar instability and cartilaginous injury include medial patellofemoral ligament repair, medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction, tibial tubercle osteotomy, and various cartilaginous repair/restoration procedures. It is important to be knowledgeable about the clinical and anatomic/radiographic risk factors associated with patients presenting with patellar instability, the algorithm for treatment, the indications and surgical technique for medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction and tibial tubercle osteotomy, and management of cartilaginous injury to the patellofemoral joint.

Recurrent Patellar Dislocations Without Untreated Predisposing Factors: Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Versus Other Medial Soft-Tissue Surgical Techniques-A Meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To provide a direct comparison between medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction and the other medial patellofemoral soft-tissue surgeries in the restoration of the medial patellar restraint after lateral patellar dislocations in the absence of untreated predisposing factors such as high grade trochlear dysplasia, knee malalignment, patella alta or high tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane-library, Web of Science, and gray literature databases were searched to find all the relevant records. Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were performed following the Cochrane and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines. Different techniques to treat lateral patellar dislocation in the absence of untreated predisposing factors were compared in terms of redislocation and complication rates, Kujala, Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee, and Tegner scores at the short-term (3 years) and long-term (>3 years) follow-up through meta-analyses. RESULTS: Six studies involving 319 knees were included in the meta-analysis. The analyses of redislocation (0.7% vs 2.9%) and minor complication rates (12% vs 9%) showed no significant differences between MPFL reconstruction and other medial soft-tissue surgeries. Significant differences favoring MPFL reconstruction were documented in Kujala and Lysholm scores at short-term (8.6, P< .001; 10.9, P < .001) and long-term follow-ups (6.3, P = .02; 13.5, P < .001). No significant differences were found in the analyses of International Knee Documentation Committee (P = .10) and Tegner scores (P = .19). Level of evidence was low or very low. CONCLUSIONS: MPFL reconstruction and medial patellofemoral soft-tissue surgery procedures were both effective in restoring the medial restraining forces preventing redislocation, but MPFL reconstruction provided better functional outcomes both at short-term and long-term follow-up. Thus, besides the treatment of predisposing factors, MPFL reconstruction seems to be, based on the results of this meta-analysis, a suitable strategy to restore the medial restraining function in the treatment of recurrent LPD. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III (meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized comparative trials).

A new device for patellofemoral instrumented stress-testing provides good reliability and validity.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the reliability of an instrumented patellofemoral (PF) stress-testing-the Porto Patellofemoral Testing Device (PPTD)-and validate the instrumented assessment method comparing to manual physical examination. METHODS: Eight asymptomatic volunteers underwent bilateral PF-instrumented examination with the PPTD and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to assess intra-rater reliability of the instrumented assessment methodology. Six patients with unilateral PF instability underwent physical examination and PPTD concomitantly with MRI. Manual examination was performed by two blinded surgeons and compared with PPTD test. Ligament stiffness was calculated and compared between injured and non-injured lower limbs. RESULTS: PPTD showed a pre-determined and reproducible stress-force application with excellent intra-rater agreement (intra-class correlation coefficient 0.83-0.98). The manual exam was imprecise with variable examiner-dependent stress-force application. The PPTD resulted in greater lateral patellar translation (converted in quadrants) than manual exam for patients that have reached maximum translation force. Measurement of patellar position and displacement using PPTD was more accurate and precise than the visual estimation of translated quadrants by manual exam. Ligament stiffness curves showed no relevant changes in patellar displacement after 62 N. CONCLUSION: The PPTD instrumented stress-testing is a valid device to quantify PF position and displacement with high intra-rater reliability, showing more accuracy, more precision and less variability than physical examination. This device provides an accurate and objective measure to quantify the patellar movement which can augment the physical examination procedures and assist clinicians in the management of decision-making and in the assessment of post-treatment outcomes of PF pathological conditions.

A Rotated and Laterally Displaced Patellar Dislocation.

BACKGROUND: Patellar dislocations are a common orthopedic emergency with several variants. The rarer variants include rotational dislocations. These often require open reduction in the operating room. CASE REPORT: We report on a case of a combined rotational and lateral patellar dislocation in a young female. We suspected and made the diagnosis of a rotational dislocation after initial unsuccessful attempts at reduction under sedation. With the assistance of our orthopedic colleagues, we were able to perform a reduction of this patient's patella under sedation in the emergency department. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: Awareness of uncommon patellar dislocations is an important area of knowledge for the emergency physician. A thorough understanding of indications and contraindications to closed reduction is important for efficient and safe management and disposition. Collaboration with orthopedic surgery colleagues is another important step in the evaluation of these patients.

Pediatric patellar dislocation.

Acute patellar dislocation affects approximately 1:1000 healthy children 9-15 years of age, and up to 50% are at risk for recurrent dislocations. In adults the condition is associated with long-term complications, such as osteoarthritis and impairment of knee function. However, literature describing the outcome in a pediatric population is sparse. The present review article evaluates the long-term effects on knee function and cartilage quality after traumatic patellar dislocation in childhood, and also to evaluate the reliability of two clinical tests of medio-lateral knee position, in healthy children.

Sporting activity is reduced following medial reefing performed for patellar dislocation : A retrospective case series of 144 patients with a minimum follow-up of 24 months.

BACKGROUND: Patellar dislocation is common in young and active patients. The purpose of this study was to determine sporting activity following the medial reefing of patellar dislocation. METHODS: One hundred forty-four patients with objective patellar dislocation were treated between 2004 and 2013. Three groups were analyzed retrospectively with a minimum follow-up of 24 months: (1) primary dislocation that was treated with medial reefing without a recurrent dislocation until the day of follow-up (n = 74), (2) primary dislocation that was initially treated with medial reefing but with a recurrent dislocation until the day of follow-up (n = 44), and (3) medial reefing after failed conservative treatment (n = 26). Sporting activity was assessed using a widely-used sporting activity questionnaire and the Tegner score prior to the injury and at the follow-up (58.7 ± 22.6 months after the injury). Clinical outcomes were assessed using IKDC and Kujala score. RESULTS: The Kujala score was 94.7 ± 9.3 for Group 1, 84.1 ± 16.6 for Group 2 and 93.4 ± 9.7 for Group 3. IKDC at the time of follow-up was 97.2 ± 9.3 for Group 1, 86.1 ± 14.6 for Group 2 and 95.1 ± 11.1 for Group 3. 91.9% of Group 1 and 92.3% of Group 3 were active in sports prior to their injuries and at the time of the follow-up. In Group 2, sporting activity reduced from 81.8 to 75.0%. In all groups, a shift from high performance to recreational sports was found. CONCLUSIONS: Despite good clinical results, sporting activity was reduced following patellar dislocation treated with medial reefing. Also, a shift from engagement in high- to low-impact sports among the participants was noted.

The reversed dynamic patellar apprehension test mimics anatomical complexity in lateral patellar instability.

PURPOSE: To develop a dynamic physical examination test that functionally simulates actual patellar instability events and that mimics the range of patellar stabilizer insufficiency in an individual patient. METHODS: Seventy-eight consecutive patients (male/female 35/43; mean age 22 ± 7 years) with recurrent lateral patellar instability and 35 controls (male/female 16/19; mean age 31 ± 14 years) were prospectively evaluated using the reversed dynamic patellar apprehension test (ReDPAT). Anatomical predisposition was assessed according to Dejour's classification of trochlear dysplasia, tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance, tibial tuberosity-posterior cruciate ligament distance, patellar height, and varus/valgus malalignment. RESULTS: The study group had an average of 3.4 ± 1.0 (1-6) anatomical risk factors for lateral patellar dislocation. Severe trochlear dysplasia (84%) and patella alta (49%) were the most common. Test sensitivity and specificity was 93.7% (95% CI 0.8584-0.9791) and 88.2% (95% CI 0.7255-0.9670), respectively. The positive predictive value reached 94.9% (95% CI 0.8739-0.9859) and the negative predictive value was 85.7% (95% CI 0.6974-0.9519). The ReDPAT results became positive at a mean knee flexion angle of 58° ± 17° (20°-90°). Knee flexion angle correlated significantly with the severity of trochlear dysplasia (p = 0.018), valgus deformity (p = 0.011), and the total number of anatomical risk factors (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: This study introduced the reversed dynamic patellar apprehension test as a reliable clinical examination tool in the assessment of lateral patellar instability. The results of this study indicate that the degree of knee joint flexion at which the provocative sense of apprehension becomes positive correlates with severity of trochlear dysplasia, valgus deformity and the total number of anatomical risk factors for patellar instability. This test indicates the patient-specific end of stable patellar tracking and the beginning of patellar stabilizer insufficiency. Therefore, this test might be helpful in deciding for or against a bony procedure in the treatment of patellar dislocation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Surgical Treatment of Congenital and Obligatory Dislocation of the Patella in Children.

BACKGROUND: Congenital (fixed) dislocations and obligatory (habitual) patellar dislocations represent a complex clinical and surgical challenge. Numerous treatment options, offering different perspectives, and surgical solutions are reported in the literature.We implemented the surgical technique principles, originally described by Stanisavljevic, for congenital (fixed) and obligatory (habitual) patellar dislocations, with slight modifications. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the results of group of 12 patients (15 knees), operated between the years 2002 and 2013. The procedure includes extensive subperiosteal quadriceps realignment and soft tissue medial plication, followed by distal realignment through patellar tendon splitting. The outcome measures were patellar stability, knee range of motion, Pedi-IKDC knee function score, and the PODCI global function score. RESULTS: The study group included 12 patients, 9 females and 3 males (15 knees) whose mean age was 5 years 2 months at diagnosis and 7 years 5 months at surgery. Nine patients had an underlying diagnosed genetic background [Down syndrome (n=6), Larsen syndrome (n=2), nail-patella syndrome (n=1)]. The mean follow-up was 46.2 months. Eleven patients, gained stable patella with no recurrence of dislocation. Postoperative knee active extension was improved significantly (P<0.0001) for all patients. The average postoperative Pedi-IKDC and PODCI scores were significantly higher (P<0.001) among the idiopathic group. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the Stanisavljevic procedure principles with modifications, provides an efficient method for treatment of fixed and obligatory patellar dislocation. In our opinion, young age at surgery played an important role in the surgical outcome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-therapeutic.

Suboptimal patellofemoral alignment is associated with poor clinical outcome scores after primary total knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Proper patellofemoral alignment is an important goal in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Acceptable patellar alignment is defined as patellar tilt less than or equal to 5° and patellar displacement less than or equal to 5 mm. Previous studies reported an incidence of post-operative patellar malalignment in TKA from 7 to 35%. However, correlation between patellar malalignment and clinical outcome after TKA remains unclear. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effect of patellar tilt and displacement on the clinical outcome of TKA. METHODS: A retrospective review of 138 primary TKAs with a minimum of 2 year follow-up is reported. Pre-operative and post-operative mechanical axis, patellar tilting angle and patellar displacement were measured. Clinical outcomes were evaluated by the knee functional scores including the Knee Society Score (KSS), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and Western Ontario McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) at final follow-up. RESULTS: Forty-two (30%) primary TKAs had suboptimal patellofemoral alignment with a patellar tilt angle greater than 5° or lateral patellar displacement of more than 5 mm. There was no statistical difference in pre-operative mechanical axis, pre-operative patellar tilt angle, or pre-operative lateral patellar displacement between the primary TKAs with proper patellofemoral alignment and those with suboptimal alignment. Patients with post-operative patellar tilt or displacement had clinically significant reductions in KSS, KOOS, and WOMAC when compared with patients without post-operative patellar tilt or displacement. The odds of having a fair or poor post-operative result, an odds ratio of 3.4 (95% CI 1.6-7.2) for KSS, 6.4 (95% CI 2.9-14.2) for KOOS, and 5.9 (95% CI 2.6-13.5) for WOMAC, were associated with suboptimal patellofemoral alignment. CONCLUSION: Establishing proper patellofemoral alignment remains an essential goal of primary TKA. There is a strong association between suboptimal post-operative patellofemoral alignment and poor clinical outcome scores after primary TKA.

What is the chance that a patella dislocation will happen a second time: update on the natural history of a first time patella dislocation in the adolescent.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Patellar instability occurs mainly in young patients and shows a high incidence of concomitant cartilage injuries. Recently there has been a strong attempt to identify risk factors and enhance imaging techniques to detect patients with an increased risk for recurrent patella dislocation.We describe current findings on factors associated with recurrent patella dislocation in the adolescent. RECENT FINDINGS: Trochlear dysplasia, patellar height, patellar tilt, tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance, skeletal maturity, and history of contralateral patellar dislocation are well known significant risk factors for recurrence in adolescent patients. Predictive models to calculate risk of recurrence have been reported recently. The Patellar Instability Severity Score was the first to include demographic and anatomic factors, which is of major value when counseling patients and relatives. SUMMARY: Several classification systems to predict the rate of recurrence after primary patella dislocation have been presented over the last years. Anatomic risk factors such as skeletal immaturity, trochlear morphology, patellar height, patellar tilt, and elevated tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance have been investigated. However, there is still a lack of knowledge as to how single risk factors or their interaction with each other may contribute.

The Relationship of Femoral Tunnel Positioning in Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction on Clinical Outcome and Postoperative Complications.

PURPOSE: To analyze the relation of the femoral tunnel (FT) positioning on clinical outcome. METHODS: Patients with recurrent patellar dislocation who underwent medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction with or without tibial tubercle osteotomy between 1998 and 2012 were included in this retrospective study. Strict postoperative lateral radiographs were mandatory. Knees with previous osseous stabilization surgery, fixed lateral patellar dislocation, valgus knee (>5°), or open growth plates were excluded. The distance between the FT and the validated radiographic landmark (the "Schoettle point") was measured. An FT with a distance greater than 10 mm was considered as malpositioned. The distance was correlated to subjective outcome measurements (patient satisfaction and Kujala score) and postoperative complications (a loss of range of motion and revision surgery). RESULTS: Sixty-three knees in 60 patients (aged 23.7 ± 7.5 years at the time of surgery, 79.4% female) were included with a mean follow-up of 5.7 ± 3.3 years. The FT showed an average distance of 13.3 mm (±6.0 mm; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 11.7-14.8) to the Schoettle point, and 45 of 63 knees (71.4%) were deemed malpositioned. The postoperative Kujala score of malpositioned FT (75.9 points; 95% CI: 71.2-80.7) was not significantly inferior to knees with an FT within 10 mm (80.5; 95% CI: 73.7-87.3, P = .315). However, all 5 knees that underwent revision surgery showed an FT outside the 10-mm area. CONCLUSIONS: Malpositioning of the FT in MPFL reconstruction is associated with postoperative complications. However, a malpositioned FT in MPFL reconstruction will not necessarily lead to an unsatisfactory subjective or objective clinical outcome. Other factors, such as surgical indication or graft tensioning, might also significantly influence postoperative outcome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case-control study.

Combined Tibial Tubercle Osteotomy and Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction for Recurrent Lateral Patellar Instability in Patients With Multiple Anatomic Risk Factors.

PURPOSE: To report the outcomes for combined tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO) and medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction and assess for potential risk factors for recurrent instability and/or poor outcomes. METHODS: The medical record at our institution was reviewed for patients treated with MPFL reconstruction and TTO for recurrent lateral patellar instability from 1998 to 2014. Preoperative imaging was assessed for trochlear dysplasia according to the Dejour classification (high grade = B, C, D) and the presence of patella alta using the Caton-Deschamps ratio (>1.2). The indication for combined MPFL reconstruction and TTO was MPFL insufficiency and a lateralized tibial tubercle. Outcomes were determined by recurrent instability, return to sport, and Kujala and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores. RESULTS: Thirty knees in 28 patients (14 M, 14 F) with a mean age of 22.6 ± 9.1 years (range, 13-51 years) were included with a mean follow-up of 48 ± 28 months (24-123 months). Seventy-three percent (22/30) had high-grade trochlear dysplasia, and 63% (19/30) had patella alta. One patient had a postoperative dislocation and 1 had a subluxation event. The Caton-Deschamps ratio decreased by a mean of 0.2 (P = .001), leaving 30% with postoperative patella alta. The mean postoperative scores were as follows: Tegner = 5 ± 2, Kujala = 89 ± 16 (45-100), and IKDC = 85 ± 17 (44-100). Eighty-three percent (15/18) returned to their preoperative sport. Female gender was a risk factor for lower IKDC (77.3 vs. 92.6, P = .01) and Kujala (82.2 vs. 95.0, P = .03) scores. Medialization greater than 10 mm was directly correlated to lower IKDC (P = .02) and Kujala (P = .01) scores. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of MPFL reconstruction and TTO in patients with trochlear dysplasia results in low recurrence of instability. Patients on average had good subjective outcomes and were able to return to sport. Female gender and tibial tubercle medialization greater than 10 mm were associated with worse outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.