Platelet function testing: Update on determinant variables and permissive windows using a platelet-count-based device.

While there are various aspects of platelet biology that can be studied in the lab (i.e. adhesion, degranulation, integrin activation), the master test for platelet function is that which gives a measure of the platelet aggregation capacity upon stimulation with an agonist. Platelet function testing is necessary for the diagnosis of platelet disorders and the monitoring of patients receiving anti-platelet treatments. Furthermore, it becomes relevant in the quality control of platelet concentrates for transfusion purposes, especially considering the global concern about long term storage, other forms of storage (i.e. cryopreservation, lyophilization), and the impact of Pathogen Reduction Treatments (PRTs) on platelet performance upon transfusion. However, it has been acknowledged as technically difficult and demanding, since a fine platelet function test must be carried out under specific conditions. Still, there might be occasions that preclude the platelet function testing abiding to the gold standard requirements, thus, leaving us with the necessity to redefine which variables may condition or limit the analysis of platelet function testing. In the present manuscript, we test different variables (such as the anticoagulant used or the time elapsed since extraction) and the possibility to reconstitute blood prior to platelet function analysis. This study aims to provide windows of action at the diagnostics lab, especially when not all of the recommended procedures and conditions can be followed: for example, when a sample is sent from a long distance, when there is a limitation on blood extraction volume or when certain parameters (platelet count) preclude reliable test results.

Point-of-care platelet function tests: relevance to arterial thrombosis and opportunities for improvement.

Studies using whole blood platelet aggregometry as a laboratory research tool, provided important insights into the mechanism and modulators of platelet aggregation. Subsequently, a number of point-of-care (POC) platelet function tests (PFTs) were developed for clinical use, based on the concept that an individual's thrombotic profile could be assessed in vitro by assessing the response to stimulation of platelet aggregation by specific, usually solo agonists such as adenosine diphosphate (ADP), collagen and thrombin. However, adjusting antiplatelet medication in order to improve the results of such POC PFTs has not translated into a meaningful reduction in cardiovascular events, which may be attributable to important differences between the POC PFT techniques and in vivo conditions, including patient-to-patient variability. Important limitations of most tests include the use of citrate-anticoagulated blood. Citrate directly and irreversibly diminishes platelet function and even after recalcification, it may result in altered platelet aggregation in response to ADP, epinephrine or collagen, and interfere with thrombin generation from activated platelets. Furthermore, most tests do not employ flowing blood and therefore do not assess the effect of high shear forces on platelets that initiate, propagate and stabilize arterial thrombi. Finally, the effect of endogenous thrombolysis, due to fibrinolysis and dislodgement, which ultimately determines the outcome of a thrombotic stimulus, is mostly not assessed. In order to accurately reflect an individual's predisposition to arterial thrombosis, future tests of thrombotic status which overcome these limitations should be used, to improve cardiovascular risk prediction and to guide pharmacotherapy.

Microelectromechanical System Measurement of Platelet Contraction: Direct Interrogation of Myosin Light Chain Phosphorylation.

Myosin Light Chain (MLC) regulates platelet contraction through its phosphorylation by Myosin Light Chain Kinase (MLCK) or dephosphorylation by Myosin Light Chain Phosphatase (MLCP). The correlation between platelet contraction force and levels of MLC phosphorylation is unknown. We investigate the relationship between platelet contraction force and MLC phosphorylation using a novel microelectromechanical (MEMS) based clot contraction sensor (CCS). The MLCK and MLCP pair were interrogated by inhibitors and activators of platelet function. The CCS was fabricated from silicon using photolithography techniques and force was validated over a range of deflection for different chip spring constants. The force of platelet contraction measured by the clot contraction sensor (CCS) was compared to the degree of MLC phosphorylation by Western Blotting (WB) and ELISA. Stimulators of MLC phosphorylation produced higher contraction force, higher phosphorylated MLC signal in ELISA and higher intensity bands in WB. Inhibitors of MLC phosphorylation produced the opposite. Contraction force is linearly related to levels of phosphorylated MLC. Direct measurements of clot contractile force are possible using a MEMS sensor platform and correlate linearly with the degree of MLC phosphorylation during coagulation. Measured force represents the mechanical output of the actin/myosin motor in platelets regulated by myosin light chain phosphorylation.

Monitoring Antiplatelet Aggregation In Vivo and In Vitro by Microtiter Plate Method.

BACKGROUND: The current light transmission aggregation method is a recognized conventional method for platelet function evaluation, but it is time-consuming and poor in parallelism and cannot simultaneously monitor multiple inducers at multiple levels. The microtiter plate method has been established because of the high-throughput characteristic, but it needs more practical applications. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the microtiter plate method by using aspirin and clopidogrel in vivo and in vitro. METHODS: In vitro, the platelet aggregations inhibited by aspirin (0.3, 1, 3, 10, 30, 90 µM) and clopidogrel (1, 3, 10, 30, 100, 300 µM) were evaluated with the presence of arachidonic acid (AA) and adenosine diphosphate (ADP) agonists. Using the combination index (CI), the effect of the combination of aspirin and clopidogrel on platelet aggregation was evaluated. In vivo, New Zealand rabbits (n = 18) were randomly divided into 3 groups, aspirin group (5 mg/kg, intragastrical gavage [i.g.]), clopidogrel group (14 mg/kg at the first day, followed by 4 mg/kg, i.g.), and the combination of these two drugs, administered (i.g.) continuously for 7 days. Then, the blood was collected to measure platelet aggregation. RESULTS: Different concentrations of AA (12.5, 25, 50, 100 µM) and ADP (1.25, 2.5, 5, 10 µM) could promote platelet aggregation in concentration-dependent manner, and the most stable induction concentrations of AA and ADP were 50 and 5 µM. In vitro, with the above optimized detection system, aspirin and clopidogrel alone or in combination had concentration-dependent antiplatelet aggregation. The combination of aspirin and clopidogrel also showed synergistic inhibition effect within the concentration range studied. In vivo, aspirin and clopidogrel alone or in combination inhibited platelet aggregation induced by multiple concentrations of AA and ADP agonists, and the combined inhibition was more significant during the administration than aspirin or clopidogrel alone. CONCLUSIONS: The improved microtiter plate method combining the use of multiple levels of multiple agonists avoids the variation of the effective inducer concentrations due to individual different response of platelets to agonists. It may be a potential approach in the detection of platelet aggregation.

Platelet-Derived Thrombogenicity Measured by Total Thrombus-Formation Analysis System in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

BACKGROUND: Prompt and potent antiplatelet effects are important aspects of management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). We evaluated the association between platelet-derived thrombogenicity during PPCI and enzymatic infarct size in STEMI patients.Methods and Results:Platelet-derived thrombogenicity was assessed in 127 STEMI patients undergoing PPCI by: (1) the area under the flow-pressure curve for the PL-chip (PL18-AUC10) using the total thrombus-formation analysis system (T-TAS); and (2) P2Y12reaction units (PRU) using the VerifyNow system. Patients were divided into 2 groups (High and Low) based on median PL18-AUC10during PPCI. PRU levels during PPCI were suboptimal in both the High and Low PL18-AUC10groups (median [interquartile range] 266 [231-311] vs. 272 [217-317], respectively; P=0.95). The percentage of final Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 3 flow was lower in the High PL18-AUC10group (75% vs. 90%; P=0.021), whereas corrected TIMI frame count (31.3±2.5 vs. 21.0±2.6; P=0.005) and the incidence of slow-flow/no-reflow phenomenon (31% vs. 11%, P=0.0055) were higher. The area under the curve for creatine kinase (AUCCK) was greater in the High PL18-AUC10group (95,231±7,275 IU/L h vs. 62,239±7,333 IU/L h; P=0.0018). Multivariate regression analysis identified high PL18-AUC10during PPCI (ß=0.29, P=0.0006) and poor initial TIMI flow (ß=0.37, P<0.0001) as independent determinants of AUCCK. CONCLUSIONS: T-TAS-based high platelet-derived thrombogenicity during PPCI was associated with enzymatic infarct size in patients with STEMI.

Comparison of three common whole blood platelet function tests for in vitro P2Y12 induced platelet inhibition.

In the context of interventional cardiology, platelet function testing may identify patients treated with P2Y12-inhibitors at an increased risk of mortality, thrombosis and bleeding. Several whole blood point-of-care platelet function analyzers are available; however, inter-device differences have not been examined systematically. To compare three platelet function tests under standardized in vitro conditions. Healthy volunteer (n = 10) blood samples were spiked with increasing concentrations of ticagrelor (0-7500 ng/mL) and/or ASA (0-3280 ng/mL), measured on three platelet function analyzers (TEG®6s, Multiplate®, and VerifyNow®) and respective Effective Concentration (EC) levels EC10, EC50 and EC90 were calculated. Repeatability was assessed in a separate group of pooled blood samples (n = 10) spiked with ticagrelor at EC10, EC50 and EC90. ASA had no impact on ADP-activated channels for all three devices. TEG®6s was able to distinguish (p ≤ 0.05) between all ticagrelor EC zones; VerifyNow® and Multiplate® were able to distinguish between three and two zones, respectively. Multiplate® showed the largest window between EC10 and EC90 (19-9153 ng/mL), followed by TEG®6s (144-2589 ng/mL), and VerifyNow® (191-1100 ng/mL). Drug effect models distribution of disagreements were identified for TEG®6s (5.0%), VerifyNow® (8.3%), and Multiplate® (13.3%). TEG®6s showed the smallest average coefficient of variation between EC conditions (5.1%), followed by Multiplate® (14.1%), and VerifyNow® (17.7%). Linear models could be generated between TEG®6s and Multiplate®, but not VerifyNow®. Significant differences were found between whole blood point-of-care platelet function analyzers and the clinical impact of these differences needs to be further investigated.

Whole blood platelet aggregation determined by the ROTEM platelet equipment; reference intervals and stability.

Point of care testing of residual effect of antiplatelet therapy in trauma patients or during major surgery may result in improved clinical management of significant bleeding. We included 121 healthy individuals (57 females and 64 males, aged 22-65 years) in order to establish reference intervals for platelet aggregation induced by adenosine diphosphate (ADPTEM, 10 µM), arachidonic acid (ARATEM, 0.42 mM) and thrombin activating peptide (TRAPTEM, 36 µM) employing the ROTEM platelet module. Further, the impact of citrate (3.2%) and hirudin (>15 µg/ml) as anticoagulants was evaluated. Finally, we investigated assay stability (15, 30, 60, and 120 min after blood sampling) (n = 8) and between-day variation (n = 5). We report reference intervals for 121 healthy individuals and reference intervals by gender. We observed significantly higher platelet aggregation in females than in males (all P-values < 0.05). No correlation between age and platelet aggregation was observed, except for the parameter TRAPTEM amplitude (A6), in which a decline in A6 was observed with increasing age (P = 0.03). We observed significantly lower levels of platelet aggregation in citrate tubes than in hirudin tubes (all P-values < 0.05), except from TRAPTEM maximum slope, where no significant difference was observed (P = 0.40).The stability was acceptable (≤20% deviation) for up to 120 min for ARATEM in citrate tubes, and up to 60 min for the ADPTEM and TRAPTEM assays in citrate tubes. In hirudin tubes we found ADPTEM and ARATEM assays to be stable for 60 min, while the stability of TRAPTEM in hirudin tubes was found to be stable for 30 min. Using citrate tubes, the between-day variation (mean coefficient of variation, CV) was 19-20% for ADPTEM, 19-26% for TRAPTEM, and 10% for ARATEM, whereas the mean CV was 11-13% for all three assays in hirudin tubes.In conclusion, we established combined and gender-specific reference intervals for three platelet aggregation assays in both citrate- and hirudin tubes. In citrate tubes, the stability of the ROTEM platelet assays was 60-120 min, while the stability in hirudin tubes was 30-60 min. The between-day variation was lowest for samples obtained in hirudin tubes.

The MICELI (MICrofluidic, ELectrical, Impedance): Prototyping a Point-of-Care Impedance Platelet Aggregometer.

As key cellular elements of hemostasis, platelets represent a primary target for thrombosis and bleeding management. Currently, therapeutic manipulations of platelet function (antithrombotic drugs) and count (platelet transfusion) are performed with limited or no real-time monitoring of the desired outcome at the point-of-care. To address the need, we have designed and fabricated an easy-to-use, accurate, and portable impedance aggregometer called "MICELI" (MICrofluidic, ELectrical, Impedance). It improves on current platelet aggregation technology by decreasing footprint, assay complexity, and time to obtain results. The current study aimed to optimize the MICELI protocol; validate sensitivity to aggregation agonists and key blood parameters, i.e., platelet count and hematocrit; and verify the MICELI operational performance as compared to commercial impedance aggregometry. We demonstrated that the MICELI aggregometer could detect platelet aggregation in 250 µL of whole blood or platelet-rich plasma, stimulated by ADP, TRAP-6, collagen, epinephrine, and calcium ionophore. Using hirudin as blood anticoagulant allowed higher aggregation values. Aggregation values obtained by the MICELI strongly correlated with platelet count and were not affected by hematocrit. The operational performance comparison of the MICELI and the Multiplate® Analyzer demonstrated strong correlation and similar interdonor distribution of aggregation values obtained between these devices. With the proven reliability of the data obtained by the MICELI aggregometer, it can be further translated into a point-of-care diagnostic device aimed at monitoring platelet function in order to guide pharmacological hemostasis management and platelet transfusions.

Platelet Activity Measured by VerifyNow® Aspirin Sensitivity Test Identifies Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Patients at Increased Risk for Postoperative Bleeding and Transfusion.

BACKGROUND: Identifying predictors of bleeding in patients before coronary artery bypass grafting surgery is important, given the complications of bleeding and finite supply of blood. Patient response to aspirin is heterogeneous and can be evaluated using point-of-care platelet function tests. We postulated that patients who hyper-respond to aspirin given preoperatively, as identified by VerifyNow® Aspirin assay (Accumetrics, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA), are at increased risk of bleeding and transfusion. METHODS: This prospective pilot study examined response to aspirin in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (n = 61) from 2009 to 2013. Patients with aspirin reaction unit (ARU) values in the lower 50th percentile as identified by VerifyNow® assays were defined as aspirin hyper-responders. The proportion of patients transfused and the median adjusted indexed drop in haemoglobin were compared between aspirin hyper-responders and non-hyper-responders. Logistic regression was performed to determine factors associated with increased risk of transfusion. RESULTS: Seventy per cent (70%) of aspirin hyper-responders were transfused perioperatively compared with 39% of patients who did not hyper-respond, (OR 3.694, 95% CI 1.275-10.706, p = 0.014). VerifyNow® Aspirin hyper-responders had a greater median adjusted indexed drop in haemoglobin compared to non-hyper-responders (34.1 g/L versus 26.6 g/L respectively, p = 0.032). Multivariate analysis also showed VerifyNow® Aspirin hyper-response to be an independent predictor of transfusion (p = 0.016). Other variables such as age, gender, body mass index, renal insufficiency, and cross clamp and bypass times were not predictors of postoperative bleeding in this pilot cohort. CONCLUSIONS: VerifyNow® Aspirin is able to preoperatively identify aspirin hyper-responders at an increased risk of bleeding and subsequent transfusion in the context of coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Evaluation of the Newly Developed Adenosine Diphosphate-Induced Platelet Aggregation Level System in Aggregometer on Automated Coagulation Analyzer.

BACKGROUND: Light transmission aggregometry (LTA) is the gold standard for platelet function assessment. The automated coagulation analyzer from Sysmex that performs LTA offers the advantage of being a walk-away technology. Recently, a new parameter "ADP-induced platelet aggregation level (APAL)" was developed to support the interpretation of results. APAL is calculated as a score from 0.0 to 10.0 based on platelet aggregation patterns with 1 and 10 µM adenosine diphosphate (ADP). Here, the basic performance of the newly developed APAL system and comparison with the maximum aggregation rate of ADP (ADP-MA) was evaluated. METHODS: The within-run precision was calculated by conducting five replicate analyses of the platelet-rich plasma (PRP) from healthy volunteers and 0.05 µM of cangrelor-spiked PRP. Cangrelor is a P2Y12 inhibitor that does not require liver CYP activation. The reference interval was calculated from the results of 67 healthy volunteers. The effect of the antiplatelet P2Y12 agent was evaluated using several concentrations of cangrelor. A comparative study was performed using 103 PRP samples with different levels of aggregation. Each test was analyzed with both APAL and ADP-MA. RESULTS: The percentage coefficient of variation in within-run precision was within 7% for APAL and 10 µM ADP-MA. Reference interval of APAL and 10 µM ADP-MA was 7.1 - 10.0 and 80.0 - 99.2%, respectively. APAL signifi-cantly decreased with the addition of 0.02 µM cangrelor, while 10 µM ADP-MA was barely affected. A significant correlation was observed between APAL and 10 µM ADP-MA (r = 0.94; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The newly developed APAL system exhibited an acceptable performance. APAL score showed a good correlation with ADP-MA and was adequate to detect the weak effect of P2Y12 inhibitors. APAL is a new platelet aggregation scoring system with the potential to monitor the effects of P2Y12 inhibitor over a wide range.

A Comparative Study of SEER Sonorheometry Versus Standard Coagulation Tests, Rotational Thromboelastometry, and Multiple Electrode Aggregometry in Cardiac Surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Coagulation point-of-care tests for the diagnosis and management of bleeding commonly are used in cardiac surgery. Recently, a new viscoelastic point-of-care device, Quantra (HemoSonics, Charlottesville, VA), which is based on sonic estimation of elasticity via resonance sonorheometry, entered the market. Prior studies have compared the Quantra parameters with conventional coagulation tests and thromboelastography or rotational thromboelastography, but no study has assessed the correlation of the platelet-derived Quantra parameter platelet contribution to stiffness (PCS) with platelet function assays. The present study compared the Quantra-derived coagulation parameters with conventional coagulation tests, rotational thromboelastography-derived parameters, and platelet function measured using multiplate aggregometry. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: University research hospital. PARTICIPANTS: The study comprised 30 cardiac surgery patients before and after cardiopulmonary bypass. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Quantra clot stiffness showed a very strong correlation with the EXTEM maximum clot firmness before and after cardiopulmonary bypass and in the overall samples (r values 0.94-0.96). Quantra fibrinogen contribution to stiffness was compared with the corresponding FIBTEM and Clauss fibrinogen levels, which also showed a strong level of correlation (r values between 0.74 and 0.87). Quantra PCS strongly correlated with platelet count (r = 0.71) in the overall samples and moderately with adenosine diphosphate-dependent platelet function (r = 0.67). In a multivariable model, both the adenosine diphosphate test value and the platelet count remained independently associated with Quantra PCS. CONCLUSIONS: Fibrinogen-dependent clot stiffness properties are well-reflected by the Quantra fibrinogen contribution to stiffness parameter, and PCS incorporates platelet count and function.

Pilot study of novel lab methodology and testing of platelet function in adolescent women with heavy menstrual bleeding.

BackgroundApproximately 40% of adolescent women experience heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB), and 10-62% of them have an underlying bleeding disorder (BD). Diagnosing a BD remains challenging because of limitations of available clinical platelet function assays. The aim of this study was to characterize platelet function in a population of adolescent women with HMB using small-volume whole-blood assays.MethodsAnticoagulated whole blood was used to assess platelet GPIIbIIIa activation, α-granule secretion, and aggregation in response to multiple agonists. Platelet adhesion on collagen or von Willebrand Factor (VWF) under static and shear flow was also assessed.ResultsFifteen participants with HMB were included in the study, of which eight were diagnosed with a clinically identifiable BD. Platelet activation was blunted in response to calcium ionophore in participants without a BD diagnosis compared with that in all other participants. Impaired GPIIbIIIa activation was observed in response to all GPCR agonists, except adenosine diphosphate (ADP), in participants with qualitative platelet disorders. Our assays detected platelet aggregation in the majority of participants with a BD in response to ADP, collagen-related peptide (CRP), thrombin receptor activator 6 (TRAP-6), or U46619. Platelet adhesion and aggregation on collagen and VWF was decreased for participants with VWD.ConclusionParticipants with and without BD exhibited aberrant platelet function in several assays in response to select agonists.

96-well plate-based aggregometry.

While there are many bench and bedside tests to assess platelet reactivity, ex vivo light transmission aggregometry (LTA) remains the gold standard. LTA, however, is expensive, time-consuming and requires dedicated equipment and staff, making it impractical in many situations. In addition, there is significant variability between data generated at different testing sites meaning that tests often need to be repeated if a patient is transferred to the care of a different hospital. As such, there is clearly an unmet need for standardization of platelet testing. Using the principles of LTA, aggregometry can be conducted in 96-well plates with readings being made in a standard plate reader. This approach allows for the assessment of multiple concentrations of agonists, since the volume of platelets required for each test is significantly lower than for LTA. Furthermore, the lyophilization of a set panel of agonists to a 96-well plate to produce a stable assay substrate allows the production of portable, standardized plates that can be used to generate reproducible tests at multiple sites. In this review, we will discuss the methods and uses of 96-well plate aggregometry for both research and the clinic.

Platelet aggregation measured by single-platelet counting and using PFA-100 devices.

Platelets play a crucial role in haemostasis and thrombosis and evaluation of platelet function in vitro, in particular platelet aggregation responses, has been one of the most common and useful ways of evaluating the risk of bleeding and thrombotic events and assessing the effects of various compounds and conditions on platelets. Traditional approaches to assessing platelet aggregation require specialised equipment and trained laboratory personnel and have other limitations. Studying platelet aggregation in whole blood offers a more physiologically relevant measurement. Additionally, certain approaches could be more widely available than in specialised laboratories. Here we summarise the application of the platelet function analyser (PFA-100), an accessible first point-of-care test for platelet function in whole blood, and the less established, but promising approach of assessing platelet aggregation by single-platelet counting that can also be performed in whole blood. The possibilities of a wider and more accessible application of the latter methodology are also discussed.

Platelet biomechanics, platelet bioenergetics, and applications to clinical practice and translational research.

The purpose of this review is to explore the relationship between platelet bioenergetics and biomechanics and how this relationship affects the clinical interpretation of platelet function devices. Recent experimental and technological advances highlight platelet bioenergetics and biomechanics as alternative avenues for collecting clinically relevant data. Platelet bioenergetics drive energy production for key biomechanical processes like adhesion, spreading, aggregation, and contraction. Platelet function devices like thromboelastography, thromboelastometry, and aggregometry measure these biomechanical processes. Platelet storage, stroke, sepsis, trauma, or the activity of antiplatelet drugs alters measures of platelet function. However, the specific mechanisms governing these alterations in platelet function and how they relate to platelet bioenergetics are still under investigation.

Not all light transmission aggregation assays are created equal: qualitative differences between light transmission and 96-well plate aggregometry.

In this short article, submitted as part of the review on platelet function testing, we illustrate the quantitative and qualitative differences between classical light transmission aggregometry (LTA) and 96-well plate aggregometry. We show that responses to platelet agonists and antagonists differ depending upon the method of aggregation testing. For example, in 96-well aggregometry, responses to collagen are strongly inhibited by P2Y12 receptor antagonists while in LTA they are much less affected. Furthermore, we explore the importance of differences in the mechanical environment upon platelet aggregation. We emphasize that LTA and 96-well aggregometry are not interchangeable assays. These two assays are best used as complementary tests to explore platelet function in depth.

Platelet microaggregation in sepsis examined by quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation technology.

Antiplatelet therapies remain an area of potential interest for the treatment of sepsis; however, studies of platelet aggregation in sepsis have yielded conflicting results. We examined platelet aggregation patterns in patients with septic shock using quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation technology, a microfluidic device capable of measuring platelet microaggregate formation under flow conditions. Platelet aggregation was increased in the washed platelet samples of septic patients. Conversely, these same platelets aggregated less than healthy controls when examined in their plasma.

Platelet function investigation by flow cytometry: Sample volume, needle size, and reference intervals.

Flow cytometry is an increasingly used method for platelet function analysis because it has some important advantages compared with other platelet function tests. Flow cytometric platelet function analyses only require a small sample volume (3.5 mL); however, to expand the field of applications, e.g., for platelet function analysis in children, even smaller volumes are needed. Platelets are easily activated, and the size of the needle for blood sampling might be of importance for the pre-activation of the platelets. Moreover, to use flow cytometry for investigation of platelet function in clinical practice, a reference interval is warranted. The aims of this work were 1) to determine if small volumes of whole blood can be used without influencing the results, 2) to examine the pre-activation of platelets with respect to needle size, and 3) to establish reference intervals for flow cytometric platelet function assays. To examine the influence of sample volume, blood was collected from 20 healthy individuals in 1.0 mL, 1.8 mL, and 3.5 mL tubes. To examine the influence of the needle size on pre-activation, blood was drawn from another 13 healthy individuals with both a 19- and 21-gauge needle. For the reference interval study, 78 healthy adults were included. The flow cytometric analyses were performed on a NAVIOS flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Miami, Florida) investigating the following activation-dependent markers on the platelet surface; bound-fibrinogen, CD63, and P-selectin (CD62p) after activation with arachidonic acid, ristocetin, adenosine diphosphate, thrombin-receptor-activating-peptide, and collagen. The study showed that a blood volume as low as 1.0 mL can be used for platelet function analysis by flow cytometry and that both a 19- and 21-gauge needle can be used for blood sampling. In addition, reference intervals for platelet function analyses by flow cytometry were established.

High-throughput measurement of human platelet aggregation under flow: application in hemostasis and beyond.

In recent years, considerable progress has been made in understanding the mechanisms involved in platelet activation during hemostasis and thrombosis. Parallel-plate flow chambers and other microfluidic devices have markedly contributed to this insight. Conversely, such flow devices are now increasingly used to monitor the combined processes of platelet aggregation, thrombus formation, and coagulation in human blood. Currently, by combining microspotting and multi-color fluorescence microscopy, this technology offers the capability of high-throughput measurement of platelet activation processes, even in small blood samples. Here we review the potential of flow chamber devices for complex (multiparameter) platelet and coagulation phenotyping, focusing on patients with (genetic) platelet- or coagulation-based bleeding disorders as well as monitoring of antithrombotic medication. Animal studies are not discussed.