Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 113
Filter
1.
Mol Biol Rep ; 48(7): 5607-5619, 2021 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34191238

ABSTRACT

Over the last decade, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been considered a suitable source for cell-based therapy, especially in regenerative medicine. First, the efficacy and functions of MSCs in clinical applications have been attributed to their differentiation ability, called homing and differentiation. However, it has recently been confirmed that MSCs mostly exert their therapeutic effects through soluble paracrine bioactive factors and extracellular vesicles, especially secretome. These secreted components play critical roles in modulating immune responses, improving the survival, and increasing the regeneration of damaged tissues. The secretome content of MSCs is variable under different conditions. Oxidative stress (OS) is one of these conditions that is highly important in MSC therapy and regenerative medicine. High levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) are produced during isolation, cell culture, and transplantation lead to OS, which induces cell death and apoptosis and limits the efficacy of their regeneration capability. In turn, the preconditioning of MSCs in OS conditions contributes to the secretion of several proteins, cytokines, growth factors, and exosomes, which can improve the antioxidant potential of MSCs against OS. This potential of MSC secretome has turned it into a new promising cell-free tissue regeneration strategy.This review provides a view of MSC secretome under OS conditions, focusing on different secretome contents of MSCs and thier possible therapeutic potential against cell therapy.


Subject(s)
Mesenchymal Stem Cells/metabolism , Oxidative Stress , Secretome , Animals , Biomarkers , Exosomes/metabolism , Extracellular Vesicles/metabolism , Humans , Mesenchymal Stem Cells/cytology , Reactive Oxygen Species/metabolism , Regeneration , Regenerative Medicine/methods , Regenerative Medicine/standards
2.
Methods ; 171: 28-40, 2020 01 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31394166

ABSTRACT

Decellularised tissues and organs have been successfully used in a variety of tissue engineering/regenerative medicine applications. Because of the complexity of each tissue (size, porosity, extracellular matrix (ECM) composition etc.), there is no standardised protocol and the decellularisation methods vary widely, thus leading to heterogeneous outcomes. Physical, chemical, and enzymatic methods have been developed and optimised for each specific application and this review describes the most common strategies utilised to achieve decellularisation of soft and hard tissues. While removal of the DNA is the primary goal of decellularisation, it is generally achieved at the expense of ECM preservation due to the harsh chemical or enzymatic processing conditions. As denaturation of the native ECM has been associated with undesired host responses, decellularisation conditions aimed at effectively achieving simultaneous DNA removal and minimal ECM damage will be highlighted. Additionally, the utilisation of decellularised matrices in regenerative medicine is explored, as are the most recent strategies implemented to circumvent challenges in this field. In summary, this review focusses on the latest advancements and future perspectives in the utilisation of natural ECM for the decoration of synthetic porous scaffolds.


Subject(s)
Bone Regeneration/genetics , Extracellular Matrix/chemistry , Tissue Engineering , Tissue Scaffolds/chemistry , Animals , Biocompatible Materials/chemistry , Biocompatible Materials/pharmacology , DNA/drug effects , Extracellular Matrix/transplantation , Humans , Ligaments/drug effects , Ligaments/growth & development , Regenerative Medicine/standards , Tendons/drug effects , Tendons/growth & development , Tissue Scaffolds/standards
3.
Int J Mol Sci ; 22(14)2021 Jul 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34299123

ABSTRACT

Hyperacute serum (HAS) is a blood derivative product that promotes the proliferation of various cell types and controls inflammation in vitro. The aim of this study is to investigate the regenerative potential of different formulations of HAS, including lyophilized and hyaluronic acid combined versions, to obtain a stable and standardized therapeutic in osteoarthritis (OA), which may be able to overcome the variability limitations of platelet-rich plasma (PRP). Primary human osteoarthritic chondrocytes were used for testing cellular viability and gene expression of OA-related genes. Moreover, a co-culture of human explants of cartilage, bone and synovium under inflammatory conditions was used for investigating the inflammatory control capacities of the different therapeutics. In this study, one formulation of lyophilized HAS achieved the high cell viability rates of liquid HAS and PRP. Gene expression analysis showed that HAS induced higher Col1a1 expression than PRP. Cytokine quantification from supernatant fluids revealed that HAS treatment of inflamed co-cultures significantly reduced levels of IL-5, IL-15, IL-2, TNFα, IL-7 and IL-12. To conclude, lyophilized HAS is a stable and standardized therapeutic with high potential in joint regeneration.


Subject(s)
Chondrocytes/cytology , Osteoarthritis/therapy , Platelet-Rich Plasma/chemistry , Regeneration , Regenerative Medicine/standards , Serum/chemistry , Adult , Coculture Techniques , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Middle Aged
5.
Adv Exp Med Biol ; 1212: 49-56, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31228130

ABSTRACT

Clinical application of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), which can be differentiated into a wide variety of functional cells, is underway and some clinical trials have already been performed or are ongoing. On the other hand, the risk of carcinogenesis is an issue and the mechanism of cellular reprograming remains unknown. When iPSCs and differentiated cells are used for medical applications, quality control is also important. Here we discuss the possibility of performing quality control of iPSCs by evaluation of phospholipids, which are not just structural components of lipid bilayer membranes, but also have multiple physiological functions. Recently, methods for analysis of lipids have become more widely available and easier to perform. This article reviews the role of iPSCs in regenerative medicine and examines the possibility of using phospholipids for quality control of iPSCs and differentiated cells.


Subject(s)
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells/cytology , Lipids/analysis , Quality Control , Regenerative Medicine/standards , Cell Differentiation , Humans
6.
Arthroscopy ; 36(10): 2765-2770, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32442713

ABSTRACT

The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is responsible for protecting and promoting public health through rules and regulations. Over the past few years, the field of regenerative medicine and cell therapy have garnered significant interest, and this evolving new biology is changing fast and challenging regulatory bodies. The FDA has published a series of guidance documents outlining steps to protect consumers against potentially dangerous and unproven treatments. The agency has offered a grace period for "stem cell clinics" until November 2020 to come into compliance by obtaining Investigational New Drug applications and working to secure premarket approval of their products. With the documentation of hundreds of "stem cell clinics," the FDA needs to enforce the adherence to their outlined standards to protect patients. The aim of this review was to provide an overview of these FDA regulations and some current issues within the industry. The purpose is to educate and inform the musculoskeletal community about the current government regulations of this new expanding biology. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, expert opinion.


Subject(s)
Biological Products/standards , Government Regulation , Regenerative Medicine/legislation & jurisprudence , Regenerative Medicine/standards , Humans , Mesenchymal Stem Cells , Public Policy , Terminology as Topic , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration
7.
Eur J Clin Invest ; 49(2): e13045, 2019 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30372787

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Translational neuroscience is largely concerned with establishing causal links between biological processes and functional outcomes. Exciting new methods have emerged and top-tier biomedical journals are placing increasingly high demand for experiments that link outcomes. One pitfall to making these connections is the "ecological fallacy"-establishing a relationship between outcomes based on aggregate (averaged) results (a distinct issue from correlation vs causation). METHODS: To showcase the ecological fallacy, we first used simulated data to define and demonstrate the problem. Next, we performed a systematic review to determine the prevalence of the fallacy in top-tier biomedical journals (Science, Nature Medicine, Neuron, Nature, Nature Neuroscience, Cell). Based on our own research interests and specializations, we specifically focused on recent publications in the area of spinal cord injury and regenerative medicine. RESULTS: Of the articles reviewed which examined a relationship between central nervous system regeneration and a behavioural outcome, 100% (21/21) were subject to possible ecological fallacy. CONCLUSIONS: Ecological fallacy is highly prevalent in neuroscience research and could partially account for translation failures in this field. Reporting guidelines for in vivo experiments should include subject-level correlation analyses for the primary outcomes.


Subject(s)
Neurosciences/standards , Translational Research, Biomedical/standards , Bias , Causality , Computer Simulation , Humans , Periodicals as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Regenerative Medicine/standards , Risk Factors , Spinal Cord Injuries/therapy
8.
Cytotherapy ; 21(12): 1258-1273, 2019 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31806531

ABSTRACT

Cell and gene therapy products are rapidly being integrated into mainstream medicine. Developing global capability will facilitate broad access to these novel therapeutics. An initial step toward achieving this goal is to understand cell and gene therapy manufacturing capability in each region. We conducted an academic survey in 2018 to assess cell and gene therapy manufacturing capacity in Australia and New Zealand. We examined the following: the number and types of cell therapy manufacturing facilities; the number of projects, parallel processes and clinical trials; the types of products; and the manufacturing and quality staffing levels. It was found that Australia and New Zealand provide diverse facilities for cell therapy manufacturing, infrastructure and capability. Further investment and development will enable both countries to make important decisions to meet the growing need for cell and gene therapy and regenerative medicine in the region.


Subject(s)
Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy , Genetic Therapy , Manufacturing and Industrial Facilities/supply & distribution , Australia , Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy/methods , Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy/standards , Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Clinical Trials as Topic/methods , Clinical Trials as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Genetic Therapy/legislation & jurisprudence , Genetic Therapy/methods , Genetic Therapy/standards , Genetic Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Government Regulation , Healthcare Financing , Humans , Manufacturing and Industrial Facilities/legislation & jurisprudence , Manufacturing and Industrial Facilities/organization & administration , Manufacturing and Industrial Facilities/statistics & numerical data , New Zealand , Regenerative Medicine/legislation & jurisprudence , Regenerative Medicine/standards , Regenerative Medicine/statistics & numerical data
9.
Transfusion ; 59(9): 2952-2963, 2019 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31294868

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Rejuvenation of stored red blood cells (RBCs) increases levels of adenosine 5'-triphosphate (ATP) and 2,3-diphosphoglycerate (2,3-DPG) to those of fresh cells. This study aimed to optimize and validate the US-approved process to a UK setting for manufacture and issue of rejuvenated RBCs for a multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial in cardiac surgery. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Rejuvenation of leukoreduced RBC units involved adding a solution containing pyruvate, inosine, phosphate, and adenine (Rejuvesol, Zimmer Biomet), warming at 37°C for 60 minutes, then "manual" washing with saline adenine glucose mannitol solution. A laboratory study was conducted on six pools of ABO/D-matched units made the day after donation. On Days 7, 21, and 28 of 4 ± 2°C storage, one unit per pool was rejuvenated and measured over 96 hours for volume, hematocrit, hemolysis, ATP, 2,3-DPG, supernatant potassium, lactate, and purines added (inosine) or produced (hypoxanthine) by rejuvenation. Subsequently, an operational validation (two phases of 32 units each) was undertaken, with results from the first informing a trial component specification applied to the second. Rejuvenation effects were also tested on crossmatch reactivity and RBC antigen profiles. RESULTS: Rejuvenation raised 2,3-DPG to, and ATP above, levels of fresh cells. The final component had potassium and hemolysis values below those of standard storage Days 7 and 21, respectively, containing 1.2% exogenous inosine and 500 to 1900 µmoles/unit of hypoxanthine. The second operational validation met compliance to the trial component specification. Rejuvenation did not adversely affect crossmatch reactivity or RBC antigen profiles. CONCLUSION: The validated rejuvenation process operates within defined quality limits, preserving RBC immunophenotypes, enabling manufacture for clinical trials.


Subject(s)
Blood Preservation/methods , Erythrocytes/physiology , Regenerative Medicine/methods , Rejuvenation/physiology , 2,3-Diphosphoglycerate/metabolism , Adenosine Triphosphate/blood , Blood Grouping and Crossmatching , Blood Loss, Surgical/prevention & control , Blood Preservation/standards , Cardiac Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Cryopreservation/methods , Erythrocyte Count , Erythrocyte Transfusion/standards , Erythrocytes/cytology , Hemolysis/physiology , Humans , Immunophenotyping , Manufactured Materials , Purines/blood , Quality Control , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Regenerative Medicine/standards
10.
Curr Opin Urol ; 29(4): 419-425, 2019 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30950867

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Interactions between biomaterials and biomaterial-delivering cells and the host tissues are complexly affected by the material itself, the ultrastructure of the overall construct and cells and other bioactive factors involved. The aim of this review is to review the current understanding on the definitions of biocompatibility and current advances in improving biocompatability of tissue-engineered constructs. RECENT FINDINGS: Some synthetic materials are associated with more foreign body reactions compared with natural materials; however, they allow fabrication of materials with a great diversity of physical and mechanical properties. Material design strategies can be tailored to mimic the natural extracellular matrix topography. There are also advancements in the pharmacological functionalization of materials with improved angiogenic potential that can lead to better tissue response. Stem cells are also used to improve the tissue response of tissue-engineered materials; however, the recent regulations on regenerative medicine products necessitate significant regulatory approval processes for these. SUMMARY: The biggest challenge faced in translation of tissue-engineered constructs into clinical practice relates to their engraftment and poor tissue integration into the challenging wound bed of the pelvic floor. Biocompatibility of tissue engineered constructs can theoretically be improved by the incorporation of bioactive agents, such as vitamins C or oestradiol.


Subject(s)
Biocompatible Materials/standards , Foreign-Body Reaction/prevention & control , Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation/standards , Pelvic Floor/surgery , Prostheses and Implants/adverse effects , Tissue Engineering/standards , Biocompatible Materials/pharmacology , Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy/methods , Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy/standards , Foreign-Body Reaction/etiology , Foreign-Body Reaction/physiopathology , Humans , Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Pelvic Floor/physiopathology , Prosthesis Design/methods , Prosthesis Design/standards , Regenerative Medicine/legislation & jurisprudence , Regenerative Medicine/standards , Tissue Engineering/methods , Wound Healing
11.
Toxicol Pathol ; 47(3): 344-357, 2019 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30392453

ABSTRACT

The development of biomaterials, medical device components, finished medical products, and 3-D printed and regenerative medicine products is governed by a variety of international and country-specific standards and guidelines. Of greatest importance to planning, executing, and reporting biocompatibility, safety and efficacy studies for most biomaterials and medical components or products are the International Organization for Standardization guidelines, U.S. Pharmacopeial Convention, ASTM International, and Conformité Européenne (European Conformity) marking. The International Medical Device Regulators Forum publishes harmonized standards similar to the International Council for Harmonization. Good Laboratory Practices are applicable and guidance documents for the development of drugs and biologics can also be relevant to biomaterials, medical device components, and medical products and more recently to products produced by 3-D printing or additive manufacturing. Regenerative products may have medical device-based scaffolding and may be treated as biologics, reflecting the cell and tissue components. This compilation of international standards and guidelines provides toxicologic pathologists, toxicologists, bioengineers, and allied professionals with an overview of and source for important regulatory documents that may apply to the nonclinical development of their products.


Subject(s)
Biocompatible Materials/standards , Equipment and Supplies/standards , International Cooperation , Materials Testing/standards , Medical Device Legislation , Tissue Scaffolds/standards , Animals , Humans , International Cooperation/legislation & jurisprudence , Printing, Three-Dimensional , Regenerative Medicine/legislation & jurisprudence , Regenerative Medicine/standards
12.
Cytotherapy ; 20(6): 779-784, 2018 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29784433

ABSTRACT

The development of standards for the field of regenerative medicine has been noted as a high priority by several road-mapping activities. Additionally, the U.S. Congress recognizes the importance of standards in the 21st Century Cure Act. Standards will help to accelerate and streamline cell and gene therapy product development, ensure the quality and consistency of processes and products, and facilitate their regulatory approval. Although there is general agreement for the need of additional standards for regenerative medicine products, a shared understanding of standards is required for real progress toward the development of standards to advance regenerative medicine. Here, we describe the roles of standards in regenerative medicine as well as the process for standards development and the interactions of different entities in the standards development process. Highlighted are recent coordinated efforts between the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the National Institute of Standards and Technology to facilitate standards development and foster science that underpins standards development.


Subject(s)
Biological Products/standards , Cooperative Behavior , Inventions/standards , Regenerative Medicine/standards , Therapies, Investigational/standards , Translational Research, Biomedical/standards , United States Food and Drug Administration , Biological Products/therapeutic use , Drug Approval , Genetic Therapy/methods , Genetic Therapy/standards , Genetic Therapy/trends , Humans , Intersectoral Collaboration , Inventions/trends , Reference Standards , Regenerative Medicine/methods , Regenerative Medicine/organization & administration , Therapies, Investigational/methods , Translational Research, Biomedical/methods , Translational Research, Biomedical/organization & administration , United States
13.
Adv Exp Med Biol ; 1098: 189-198, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30238372

ABSTRACT

Cellular therapies have moved to the forefront based upon promising results from clinical trials using both chimeric antigen receptor T lymphocytes to treat leukemia and other cell types to restore structure and function to tissues that have been damaged by disease or physical injury. The pace at which these treatments have evolved has posed a regulatory challenge to agencies, such as the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). This chapter describes how a specific regulatory strategy was developed and how it has evolved in response to the demand for these new therapies.


Subject(s)
Biological Products/standards , Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy/standards , Extracellular Matrix , Regenerative Medicine/legislation & jurisprudence , Tissue Engineering/legislation & jurisprudence , Animals , Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy/methods , Humans , Investigational New Drug Application , Public Policy/trends , Regenerative Medicine/methods , Regenerative Medicine/standards , Risk Assessment , Tissue Engineering/methods , Tissue Engineering/standards , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration
14.
BMC Med ; 15(1): 49, 2017 Mar 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28270209

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Despite a steady stream of headlines suggesting they will transform the future of healthcare, high-tech regenerative medicines have, to date, been quite inaccessible to patients, with only eight having been granted an EU marketing licence in the last 7 years. Here, we outline some of the historical reasons for this paucity of licensed innovative regenerative medicines. We discuss the challenges to be overcome to expedite the development of this complex and rapidly changing area of medicine, together with possible reasons to be more optimistic for the future. DISCUSSION: Several factors have contributed to the scarcity of cutting-edge regenerative medicines in clinical practice. These include the great expense and difficulties involved in planning how individual therapies will be developed, manufactured to commercial levels and ultimately successfully delivered to patients. Specific challenges also exist when evaluating the safety, efficacy and cost-effectiveness of these therapies. Furthermore, many treatments are used without a licence from the European Medicines Agency, under "Hospital Exemption" from the EC legislation. For products which are licensed, alternative financing approaches by healthcare providers may be needed, since many therapies will have significant up-front costs but uncertain benefits and harms in the long-term. However, increasing political interest and more flexible mechanisms for licensing and financing of therapies are now evident; these could be key to the future growth and development of regenerative medicine in clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: Recent developments in regulatory processes, coupled with increasing political interest, may offer some hope for improvements to the long and often difficult routes from laboratory to marketplace for leading-edge cell or tissue therapies. Collaboration between publicly-funded researchers and the pharmaceutical industry could be key to the future development of regenerative medicine in clinical practice; such collaborations might also offer a possible antidote to the innovation crisis in the pharmaceutical industry.


Subject(s)
Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy/standards , Regenerative Medicine/legislation & jurisprudence , Regenerative Medicine/standards , Biomedical Research , Costs and Cost Analysis , Drug Industry , European Union , Forecasting , Humans , Translational Research, Biomedical
17.
Soc Stud Sci ; 46(1): 112-39, 2016 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26983174

ABSTRACT

The article explores the formation of an international politics of resistance and 'alterstandardization' in regenerative stem cell medicine. The absence of internationally harmonized regulatory frameworks in the clinical stem cell field and the presence of lucrative business opportunities have resulted in the formation of transnational networks adopting alternative research standards and practices. These oppose, as a universal global standard, strict evidence-based medicine clinical research protocols as defined by scientists and regulatory agencies in highly developed countries. The emergence of transnational spaces of alter-standardization is closely linked to scientific advances in rapidly developing countries such as China and India, but calls for more flexible regulatory frameworks, and the legitimization of experimental for-profit applications outside of evidence-based medical care, are emerging increasingly also within more stringently regulated countries, such as the United States and countries in the European Union. We can observe, then, a trend toward the pluralization of the standards, practices, and concepts in the stem cell field.


Subject(s)
Developed Countries , Developing Countries , Regenerative Medicine/standards , Stem Cell Research , Stem Cell Transplantation/standards , Government Regulation , Politics
20.
Wound Repair Regen ; 23(5): 638-43, 2015 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26019054

ABSTRACT

Nonhealing chronic wounds and exposed tendons, bones and joints are very challenging to cure specially for diabetic patients. Plastic surgeons have a new weapon to enhance wound healing with the use of autologous growth factors. Recently, the process of fabrication of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been simplified. The goal of this literature review is to summarize the evidenced-based body of knowledge regarding the treatment of diabetic chronic wounds by PRP. A PubMed and Cochrane search (1978-2015) was performed and all studies assessing the clinical effect of PRP on the healing of diabetic chronic wounds were included. The screening retrieved 7,555 articles and 12 studies were included. On six randomized studies included, five found significant benefits for the use of PRP on diabetic chronic foot ulcers and the sixth randomized study did not publish a statistical analysis but found favorable outcomes. The two other controlled studies included found significant benefits regarding the healing rate and the four uncontrolled studies included showed high rates of healing with the adjunction of PRP. Regarding the method of use, PRP was applied on the wound as a gel twice a week (41.7% of studies) or once a week (33.3% of studies). In conclusion, 87.5% of controlled studies found a significant benefit for the adjunction of PRP to treat chronic diabetic wounds. As PRP may be beneficial, we suggest using PRP on diabetic ulcers which remain unhealed after standard treatment.


Subject(s)
Diabetic Foot/therapy , Platelet-Rich Plasma , Regenerative Medicine/standards , Wound Healing , Chronic Disease , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL