Development and validation of an ultrafast method of quantification of rivaroxaban in human serum using laser diode thermal desorption coupled to triple quadrupole mass spectrometry.

RATIONALE: Rivaroxaban is an anticoagulant prescribed to patients who are at risk of medical conditions such as deep-vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolisms, and strokes caused by blood clots. The administration of this drug is monitored to adjust the dosage and evaluate patients' blood concentration. Rapid quantification of this drug in plasma could make it possible to ensure that the dose present in the blood of patients does not represent a danger for the medical intervention to be carried out. METHODS: Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry is usually employed to quantify rivaroxaban in blood, plasma, and serum. Here, an alternative method of analysis based on laser diode thermal desorption-triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (LDTD-QqQMS) was developed and comprehensively validated. This new method allows the quantification of rivaroxaban in less than 13 s from sample to sample. The extraction of rivaroxaban in human serum was done by a salting-out liquid-liquid extraction with acetonitrile and a saturated sodium chloride solution. RESULTS: The proposed method allows the quantification of rivaroxaban in less than 13 s from sample to sample. During validation, all criteria were respected. The accuracy was <15% of the nominal value, the precision was <15%CV, and the recovery was ≥89.9%. There were no observed carryover or matrix effects. Analysis of the extracted samples established the stability of dry (24 h) and wet samples (1 week) when samples cannot be analyzed immediately, a considerable advantage in a clinical setting. CONCLUSIONS: This method improves sample throughput by more than 1200% compared to liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry methods of analysis of rivaroxaban and decreases analysis costs by reducing solvent consumption and instrument time.

Heparin-Calibrated Anti-Factor Xa Assay for the Measurement of Direct Anticoagulants such as Apixaban, Rivaroxaban, and Edoxaban.

BACKGROUND: The first purpose of this study was to determine whether a measurement of the level of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) was possible with heparin-calibrated chromogenic anti-factor Xa activity (AXA). The second purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the antidote treatment decision level (30 or 50 ng/mL of DOAC) can be determined by unfractionated heparin (UHF)/low molecular weight heparin (LMWH)-calibrated AXA. METHODS: AXA was measured by using two reagents and dedicated analyzers (Sysmex CS-5100 analyzer and STA R Max3). Four types of calibrators were used: 1) Stago DOAC (rivaroxaban, edoxaban, and apixaban)-specific calibrator, 2) Stago LMWH calibrator, 3) Sysmex UHF calibrator, and 4) Sysmex LMWH calibrator. Regression analysis was used between assays. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were performed, and the concordance rate was calculated. RESULTS: The correlation coefficients were in the range of 0.75 - 0.91 for rivaroxaban and 0.81 - 0.94 for apixaban. The correlation coefficient between edoxaban-calibrated AXA and Sysmex LMWH/Sysmex UHF calibrator-calibrated AXA was low (r = 0.47). Overall correlation between DOAC-calibrated AXA and Stago LMWH-calibrated AXA was linear, at only low concentration in all three DOACs. The concordance rate (89.3 - 100%) is good for de-termining the antidote management level by UFH/LMWH-calibrated AXA, compared with those of DOAC-calibrated AXA in rivaroxaban and apixaban. The concordance rate ranged from 63% to 67% between Sysmex UFH/ LMWH-calibrated AXA and edoxaban-calibrated AXA. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of our study suggest limitations in calculating accurate concentrations, when using UFH/LMWH-calibrated AXA to measure DOAC. This study demonstrates that UFH/LMWH-calibrated AXA may be useful in determining the presence of DOACs at the cutoff level for the antidote treatment in rivarovaban and apixaban. However, in edoxaban, UFH/LMWH-calibrated AXA could not accurately measure the presence of DOACs at the cutoff for antidote treatment.

Retrospective study of clinical settings, indications and consequences of measurement of direct oral anticoagulant plasma levels in Northern Tasmania, Australia.

BACKGROUND: Routine monitoring of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) levels is not recommended but may be useful in certain clinical situations. There is a knowledge gap regarding the clinical use of DOAC levels in Australian hospitals. AIMS: To evaluate the clinical settings, indications and changes to anticoagulant management associated with DOAC levels in a tertiary hospital in Northern Tasmania, Australia. METHODS: Patients with one or more DOAC levels (dabigatran, rivaroxaban or apixaban) requested between January 2017 and December 2022 were identified. Retrospective chart review was performed to evaluate the clinical settings, indications, adequacy of request information and changes to clinical management associated with the measurement of DOAC levels. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-nine DOAC measurements (54 rivaroxaban, 66 apixaban and nine dabigatran) were performed in 98 patients between January 2017 and December 2022. Annual requests for DOAC levels increased significantly between 2017 and 2019 and remained stable between 2020 and 2021 but declined in 2022. Overall, the most common indication for a DOAC level was renal impairment, followed by bleeding and recurrent thrombosis. Approximately 25% of requests were for acute bleeding with a reversal/haemostatic agent given in 45% of patients, while 10% were prior to urgent surgery. Measurement of DOAC levels was associated with a change in management in 50% of cases. 10% of requests did not specify anticoagulant history. CONCLUSION: Trends in requests for DOAC levels have changed over time. Clinician education regarding the importance of providing specific anticoagulant history is essential. Future prospective studies investigating the clinical utility of DOAC levels in different clinical settings are needed.

Perioperative Management of Patients Taking Direct Oral Anticoagulants: A Review.

Importance: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), comprising apixaban, rivaroxaban, edoxaban, and dabigatran, are commonly used medications to treat patients with atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism. Decisions about how to manage DOACs in patients undergoing a surgical or nonsurgical procedure are important to decrease the risks of bleeding and thromboembolism. Observations: For elective surgical or nonsurgical procedures, a standardized approach to perioperative DOAC management involves classifying the risk of procedure-related bleeding as minimal (eg, minor dental or skin procedures), low to moderate (eg, cholecystectomy, inguinal hernia repair), or high risk (eg, major cancer or joint replacement procedures). For patients undergoing minimal bleeding risk procedures, DOACs may be continued, or if there is concern about excessive bleeding, DOACs may be discontinued on the day of the procedure. Patients undergoing a low to moderate bleeding risk procedure should typically discontinue DOACs 1 day before the operation and restart DOACs 1 day after. Patients undergoing a high bleeding risk procedure should stop DOACs 2 days prior to the operation and restart DOACs 2 days after. With this perioperative DOAC management strategy, rates of thromboembolism (0.2%-0.4%) and major bleeding (1%-2%) are low and delays or cancellations of surgical and nonsurgical procedures are infrequent. Patients taking DOACs who need emergent (<6 hours after presentation) or urgent surgical procedures (6-24 hours after presentation) experience bleeding rates up to 23% and thromboembolism as high as 11%. Laboratory testing to measure preoperative DOAC levels may be useful to determine whether patients should receive a DOAC reversal agent (eg, prothrombin complex concentrates, idarucizumab, or andexanet-α) prior to an emergent or urgent procedure. Conclusions and Relevance: When patients who are taking a DOAC require an elective surgical or nonsurgical procedure, standardized management protocols can be applied that do not require testing DOAC levels or heparin bridging. When patients taking a DOAC require an emergent, urgent, or semiurgent surgical procedure, anticoagulant reversal agents may be appropriate when DOAC levels are elevated or not available.

Simvastatin, but Not Atorvastatin, Is Associated with Higher Peak Rivaroxaban Serum Levels and Bleeding: an Asian Cohort Study from Singapore.

AIMS: This study attempts to identify predictors associated with bleeding and stroke and systemic embolism (SSE) in Singaporean Asians taking rivaroxaban and apixaban. METHODS: A total of 134 Singaporean patients on either rivaroxaban or apixaban for non-valvular atrial fibrillation were included for this study. Baseline characteristics were recorded at recruitment while bleeding and SSE events were recorded during a 1-year follow-up. Peak and trough drug plasma concentrations were collected based on the dosing interval and pharmacokinetics of the drugs and quantified using high performance liquid chromatography. Characteristics of patients with or without bleeds were compared using relevant statistical tests. Multivariable regression that included covariates with p < 0.1 from an initial univariable regression was performed to analyse predictors that resulted in higher risk of bleeding in patients. RESULTS: Median creatinine clearance (CrCl) was significantly lower in patients on rivaroxaban who experienced bleeds as compared to patients who did not experience bleeds (61.5 vs 70.8 mL/min, p = 0.047), while concomitant simvastatin use was found to be independently associated with a sixfold increased risk of bleeding (adjusted OR = 6.14 (95% CI: 1.18-31.97), p = 0.031) for rivaroxaban after controlling for body mass index, CrCl and having experienced a previous SSE. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that concomitant use of simvastatin with rivaroxaban may be associated with bleeding events in an Asian cohort. Further studies using physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling are required to investigate the drug-drug interactions between these drugs.

Assessment of exposure to direct oral anticoagulants in elderly hospitalised patients.

It is unclear whether elderly patients established on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have greater exposure to these drugs, which could subsequently increase their risk of bleeding. We assessed DOAC exposure and factors affecting it in a real-world elderly cohort of patients. For this, 151 medically stable hospital inpatients (76 established on apixaban, 61 on rivaroxaban, 14 on dabigatran) with a median [interquartile range (IQR)] age of 84 (78-89) years were recruited. Patients provided blood samples for measurement of peak and trough plasma DOAC concentrations. There was up to 48-fold and 13-fold variation in trough and peak plasma drug concentrations respectively. A significantly greater proportion of patients on apixaban had peak plasma drug concentrations within the reported ranges compared to those on either rivaroxaban or dabigatran (82·9% vs. 44·3% vs. 64·3% respectively; P < 0·001). A third of the variability in DOAC plasma concentrations was attributed to the influences of DOAC dosage, renal function and gender. To what extent the observed increases in DOAC exposure in the older patients is the cause of their increased risk of bleeding, which could potentially be ameliorated by dosing titration, requires further investigation.

Direct Acting Oral Anticoagulants Following Gastrointestinal Tract Surgery.

ABSTRACT: Direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vary in bioavailability and sites of absorption in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT). Data on DOAC use after major GIT surgery are limited. The aim of this case series was to report the impact of surgical resection or bypass of the GIT on rivaroxaban and apixaban peak plasma concentrations. This was a case series of patients who received rivaroxaban or apixaban after GIT surgery, during the period of July 1, 2019, to December 31, 2020. Peak plasma concentrations of rivaroxaban and apixaban were assessed for the expected concentrations. Of the 27 assessed patients, 18 (66.7%) received rivaroxaban, and 9 (33.3%) received apixaban. After rivaroxaban therapy, 4 of 5 patients (80%) who underwent gastrectomy, and 3 of 3 patients (100%) who underwent duodenum and proximal jejunum exclusion had peak plasma concentrations of rivaroxaban lower than the effective range, whereas 11 of 11 patients (100%) who underwent distal bowel or ileostomy had peak rivaroxaban plasma within the effective range. After apixaban therapy, 5 of 6 patients (83.3%) who underwent total or partial gastrectomy achieved effective peak concentrations. All the patients who underwent proximal and distal bowel resection or bypass had peak concentrations of apixaban within the effective range. In conclusion, surgical resection or bypass of the upper GIT could affect DOAC absorption and subsequently peak plasma concentrations. This effect was more observed among rivaroxaban recipients. An injectable anticoagulant or vitamin K antagonist may be preferred if DOAC concentrations cannot be measured after GIT surgery.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants Plasma Levels in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation at the Time of Bleeding: A Pilot Prospective Study.

ABSTRACT: Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) on long-term direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) may be at higher risk of bleeding because of higher anti-Xa or anti-IIa levels. However, there is no postmarketing study investigating these DOAC plasma levels at the time of bleeding. The aim of this study was to evaluate DOAC levels at the time of a bleeding emergency. We analyzed 5440 patients examined at our Emergency Department in from April 1, 2019, to September 30, 2019. During this period, we prospective identified 105 consecutive patients with bleeding while on long-term antithrombotic therapy; 49 patients had AF on DOACs. We compared DOAC levels in patients who bled against a control sample of 55 patients who tolerated long-term high dose DOAC therapy without any emergency. Samples of these patients were tested with drug-specific anti-Xa chromogenic analysis (rivaroxaban and apixaban) and with Hemoclot Thrombin Inhibitor assay (dabigatran). Dabigatran-treated patients who bled had significantly higher anti-IIa levels when compared with trough (261.4 ± 163.7 vs. 85.4 ± 57.2 ng/mL, P < 0.001) and peak samples of controls (261.4 ± 163.7 vs. 138.8 ± 78.7 ng/mL, P < 0.05). Similarly, there were significantly higher anti-Xa levels in rivaroxaban-treated and apixaban-treated patients with bleeding compared with trough control samples (rivaroxaban: 245.9 ± 150.2 vs. 52.5 ± 36.4 ng/mL, P <0.001 and apixaban: 311.8 ± 142.5 vs. 119.9 ± 81.7 ng/mL, P < 0.001), as well as in apixaban-treated patients when compared with peak control samples (311.8 ± 142.5 vs. 210.9 ± 88.7 ng/mL, P < 0.05). Finally, rivaroxaban anti-Xa levels in patients who bled tended to be higher compared with peak control samples (245.9 ± 150.2 vs. 177.6 ± 38.6 ng/mL, P = 0.13). This observational study showed a significant difference in anti-IIa and anti-Xa plasma levels in patients with AF with bleeding complications compared with those who tolerated long-term high-dose DOAC therapy without bleeding complications.

Heparin Anti-Xa Activity, a Readily Available Unique Test to Quantify Apixaban, Rivaroxaban, Fondaparinux, and Danaparoid Levels.

BACKGROUND: Despite their usefulness in perioperative and acute care settings, factor-Xa inhibitor-specific assays are scarcely available, contrary to heparin anti-Xa assay. We assessed whether the heparin anti-Xa assay can (1) be used as a screening test to rule out apixaban, rivaroxaban, fondaparinux, and danaparoid levels that contraindicate invasive procedures according to current guidelines (>30 ng·mL-1, >30 ng·mL-1, >0.1 µg·mL-1, and >0.1 IU·mL-1, respectively), (2) quantify the anticoagulant level if found significant, that is, if it exceeded the abovementioned threshold. METHODS: In the derivation cohort then in the validation cohort, via receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis, we evaluated the ability of heparin anti-Xa assay to detect levels of factor-Xa inhibitors above or below the abovementioned safety thresholds recommended for an invasive procedure (screening test). Among samples with relevant levels of factor-Xa inhibitor, we determined the conversion factor linking the measured level and heparin anti-Xa activity in a derivation cohort. In a validation cohort, the estimated level of each factor-Xa inhibitor was thus inferred from heparin anti-Xa activity. The agreement between measured and estimated levels of factor-Xa inhibitors was assessed. RESULTS: Among 989 (355 patients) and 756 blood samples (420 patients) in the derivation and validation cohort, there was a strong linear relationship between heparin anti-Xa activities and factor-Xa inhibitors measured level (r = 0.99 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.99-0.99]). In the derivation cohort, heparin anti-Xa activity ≤0.2, ≤0.3, <0.1, <0.1 IU·mL-1 reliably ruled out a relevant level of apixaban, rivaroxaban, fondaparinux, and danaparoid, respectively (area under the ROC curve ≥0.99). In the validation cohort, these cutoffs yielded excellent classification accuracy (≥96%). If this screening test indicated relevant level of factor-Xa inhibitor, estimated and measured levels closely agreed (Lin's correlation coefficient close to its maximal value: 95% CI, 0.99-0.99). More than 96% of the estimated levels fell into the predefined range of acceptability (ie, 80%-120% of the measured level). CONCLUSIONS: A unique simple test already widely used to assay heparin was also useful for quantifying these 4 other anticoagulants. Both clinical and economic impacts of these findings should be assessed in a specific study.

Evaluation of the in vitro stability of direct oral anticoagulants in blood samples under different storage conditions.

In this study, we evaluated the in vitro stability of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in blood samples of 57 patients under different storage conditions using functional coagulation assays. We determined the analyte concentrations (1) immediately after blood collection (baseline); (2) after storage of citrated whole blood (agitated) at room temperature and citrated plasma at room temperature and at 4 °C for 4, 8, and 24 h, respectively; and (3) after storage of citrated plasma at -20 °C for 30, 60, and 90 days. According to the concept of acceptable change limits (ACL), analytes were considered stable if the mean relative analyte recovery at a given time was >78%. The mean baseline values (range) of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban were 115 ng/mL (62-217), 129 ng/mL (31-215), 156 ng/mL (49-362), and 101 ng/mL (33-283), respectively. After applying the analyte stability limit, all four DOACs were stable for 24 h at room temperature and at 4 °C. The mean recovery after 24 h was 102-111% for dabigatran, 88-97% for rivaroxaban, 95-98% for apixaban, and 90-96% for edoxaban. When plasma samples were stored at -20 °C, the mean percentage deviation after 90 days for all four DOACs was ≤10%, even after three freeze-thaw cycles. Thus, for the correct determination of DOAC plasma concentrations, blood samples do not have to be analyzed immediately and can be stored at room temperature for up to 24 h before analysis. In clinical practice, blood sample transport and storage for DOAC measurements appear to be unproblematic.

Sensitive LC-MS/MS method for quantification of rivaroxaban in plasma: Application to pharmacokinetic studies.

Rivaroxaban is an anticoagulant (orally active direct Xa inhibitor) considered to reduce the risk of stroke and systemic embolism and treat deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and other cardiovascular complications. Bioanalytical methods for rivaroxaban quantification in plasma are necessary for application in pharmacokinetic studies, as well as in drug therapeutic monitoring. In this work, we developed and validated a sensitive bioanalytical method using LC-MS/MS for rivaroxaban quantification in human plasma using an one-step liquid-liquid extraction. The linear concentration range was 1-600 ng/mL. The bioanalytical method was also applied to pharmacokinetic studies in healthy volunteers under fasting and fed conditions. The results demonstrated that the method is rapid, sensitive, and adequate for application in pharmacokinetic studies.

Correlation of Thromboelastography with Apparent Rivaroxaban Concentration: Has Point-of-Care Testing Improved?

BACKGROUND: Concern remains over reliable point-of-care testing to guide reversal of rivaroxaban, a commonly used factor Xa inhibitor, in high-acuity settings. Thromboelastography (TEG), a point-of-care viscoelastic assay, may have the ability to detect the anticoagulant effect of rivaroxaban. The authors ascertained the association of apparent rivaroxaban concentration with thromboelastography reaction time, i.e., time elapsed from blood sample placement in analyzer until beginning of clot formation, as measured using TEG and TEG6S instruments (Haemonetics Corporation, USA), hypothesizing that reaction time would correlate to degree of functional factor Xa impairment. METHODS: The authors prospectively performed a diagnostic accuracy study comparing coagulation assays to apparent (i.e., indirectly assessed) rivaroxaban concentration in trauma patients with and without preinjury rivaroxaban presenting to a single center between April 2016 and July 2018. Blood samples at admission and after reversal or 24 h postadmission underwent TEG, TEG6S, thrombin generation assay, anti-factor Xa chromogenic assay, prothrombin time (PT), and ecarin chromogenic assay testing. The authors determined correlation of kaolin TEG, TEG6S, and prothrombin time to apparent rivaroxaban concentration. Receiver operating characteristic curve compared capacity to distinguish therapeutic rivaroxaban concentration (i.e., greater than or equal to 50 ng/ml) from nontherapeutic concentrations. RESULTS: Eighty rivaroxaban patients were compared to 20 controls. Significant strong correlations existed between rivaroxaban concentration and TEG reaction time (ρ = 0.67; P < 0.001), TEG6S reaction time (ρ = 0.68; P < 0.001), and prothrombin time (ρ = 0.73; P < 0.001), however reaction time remained within the defined normal range for the assay. Rivaroxaban concentration demonstrated strong but not significant association with coagulation assays postreversal (n = 9; TEG reaction time ρ = 0.62; P = 0.101; TEG6S reaction time ρ = 0.57; P = 0.112) and small nonsignificant association for controls (TEG reaction time: ρ = -0.04; P = 0.845; TEG6S reaction time: ρ = -0.09; P = 0.667; PT-neoplastine: ρ = 0.19; P = 0.301). Rivaroxaban concentration (area under the curve, 0.91) and TEG6S reaction time (area under the curve, 0.84) best predicted therapeutic rivaroxaban concentration and exhibited similar receiver operating characteristic curves (P = 0.180). CONCLUSIONS: Although TEG6S demonstrates significant strong correlation with rivaroxaban concentration, values within normal range limit clinical utility rendering rivaroxaban concentration the gold standard in measuring anticoagulant effect.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Direct Oral Anticoagulants May Increase Their Benefit-Risk Ratio.

The attractiveness of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) over vitamin K antagonists, in addition to a better benefit-risk ratio, stems from the fact that no therapeutic drug monitoring is deemed necessary. This has been recently mitigated by the fact that increased dabigatran (D) plasma levels have been associated with hemorrhages, and is currently under scrutiny of the European Medicines Agency. We aimed to evaluate, in real conditions of use, whether patients with out-of-range DOAC blood concentrations (too high or too low) were associated with bleeding or thrombosis. Patients treated with D or rivaroxaban (R) were prospectively included in a hospital cohort. D and R plasma levels were measured by high-pressure liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry-at the physician's demand. We defined concentration range as "expected" within the 95% confidence interval of the mean concentration obtained from pivotal trials, and "out of range" when concentrations were outside of that interval. A blind assessment of concentrations versus occurrence of bleeding or thrombosis was performed by means of univariate and multivariate analysis. Three hundred and twenty-two patients (mean age 78.5 years ± 13.1), treated with D or R were included consecutively. They had a mean CHA2DS2-VASc at 4.4 ± 1.7 and a mean HAS-BLED score at 1.7 ± 0.9. Irrespective of the DOAC prescribed, patients presenting with out-of-range concentrations had significantly more bleeding or thrombosis than patients with expected concentrations (P < 0.001). Patients with bleeding were more prone to have concentrations beyond the 95 percentile (N = 62, P < 0.001), whereas patients with thrombosis were more likely to have concentrations below the fifth percentile (N = 26, P < 0.05). The main risks associated with hemorrhages were abnormal concentrations, a high HAS-BLED score, the patient's age, and the creatinine blood level. For thrombosis, a concentration below the fifth percentile was the only risk factor that was significant in our cohort. While D and R under current recommendation have a better benefit-risk ratio than warfarin, their safe usage could be further optimized by some degree of therapeutic monitoring.

Simultaneous Determination of Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban, and Apixaban in Human Plasma by Liquid Chromatography/Tandem Mass Spectrometry.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacokinetic studies and therapeutic drug monitoring of anticoagulants require a simple, rapid, and reliable analytical method for monitoring plasma concentrations. The aims of the current work were to develop and validate a liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry method for the simultaneous determination of 3 direct oral anticoagulants (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban) in human plasma that is suitable for pharmacokinetic studies and routine therapeutic drug monitoring in busy hospital laboratories. METHODS: This method included a hydrolysis step to account for the active acylglucuronide metabolites of dabigatran that demonstrate an equivalent anticoagulant effect as dabigatran. After hydrolysis, a simple one-step protein precipitation was used for sample preparation. Total dabigatran (the sum of free dabigatran and the contribution from dabigatran acylglucuronides), rivaroxaban, and apixaban, and their corresponding isotopically labeled internal standards were resolved on a C18(2) column. All compounds were detected using electrospray ionization liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry in the positive mode. RESULTS: For all 3 anticoagulants, standard curves were linear over the concentration range of 1.0-1000 mcg/L (r > 0.99), bias was < ±10%, and intraday and interday coefficients of variation (imprecision) were <10%. The limit of quantification was 1.0 mcg/L. For all 3 anticoagulants and corresponding isotopically labeled internal standards, the absolute recoveries were similar and consistent, with mean values of 93%-102%. No significant matrix effects were observed. CONCLUSIONS: This method is simple, rapid, robust, and reliable and can be used to analyze the plasma concentrations of the drugs in patients on dabigatran or rivaroxaban therapy.

Laboratory testing for activated protein C resistance: rivaroxaban induced interference and a comparative evaluation of andexanet alfa and DOAC Stop to neutralise interference.

Background Investigation of hemostasis is problematic when patients are on anticoagulant therapy. Rivaroxaban especially causes substantial interference, extending many clot-based tests, thereby leading to false positive or negative events. In particular, rivaroxaban affects some assays for activated protein C resistance (APCR). Methods We assessed, in an international setting, cross laboratory (n = 31) testing using four samples to evaluate rivaroxaban induced interference in APCR testing, and whether this interference could be neutralised. The samples comprised: (A) pool of normal plasma (APCR-negative control); (B) this normal pool spiked with rivaroxaban (200 ng/mL) to create rivaroxaban-induced interference (potential 'false' positive APCR event sample); (C) the rivaroxaban sample subsequently treated with a commercial direct oral anticoagulant 'DOAC-neutraliser' (DOAC Stop), or (D) treated with andexanet alfa (200 µg/mL). Testing was performed blind to sample type. Results The rivaroxaban-spiked sample generated false positive APCR results for some, but unexpectedly not most APCR-tests. The sample treated with DOAC Stop evidenced a correction in the rivaroxaban-affected APCR assays, and did not otherwise adversely affect the rivaroxaban 'unaffected' APCR assays. The andexanet alfa-treated sample did not evidence correction of the false positive APCR, and instead unexpectedly exacerbated false positive APCR status with many tests. Conclusions DOAC Stop was able to neutralise any APCR interference induced by rivaroxaban. In contrast, andexanet alfa did not negate such interference, and instead unexpectedly created more false-positive APCR events.

Determination of the cut-off prothrombin time to estimate plasma rivaroxaban overdose status.

Laboratory monitoring of rivaroxaban (RIV) is required under certain conditions. Mass spectrometry and anti-factor Xa assays are the recommended methods, which may not be readily available. Prothrombin time (PT) is the most widely used and simple coagulation assay. To set the cutoff PT and international normalized ratio (INR) to estimate RIV overdose status. RIV-spiked pooled normal plasma was used. PT test was performed using a CA-7000 coagulometer and Thromborel S reagent. The precise measurement of RIV concentration at the cut-off PT was evaluated according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) EP12-A2 guideline. The RIV concentration at 275 ng/mL was analyzed using 40 replicates. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to determine the cutoff value for the determination of RIV potential overdose status. An imprecision estimation of PT was conducted with 220.00 ng/mL, 247.50 ng/mL, 261.25 ng/mL, 288.75 ng/mL, 302.50 ng/mL and 330.00 ng/mL concentrations of RIV in 60 replicates. According to the ROC analysis, the cutoff clotting times and INR values to determine the overdose status of RIV were 13.45 s and 1.39. With these values, there was a 92.6% probability that plasma samples with RIV concentration ≤ 247.50 ng/mL yielded consistently negative (on-therapy dose) results, and those with ≥ 302.50 ng/mL yield consistent positive (potential overdose) results using our PT assay. PT with a reliable cutoff clotting time and INR can be used to determine the potential overdose status of RIV to facilitate the diagnosis and treatment by controlling the dose.

The management of patients with acute ischemic stroke while on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs): data from an Italian cohort and a proposed algorithm.

Approximately 1-2% of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation have an acute ischemic stroke (AIS) while on direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) treatment every year. However, current evidence on stroke subtypes, pathophysiology and factors leading to the failure of DOAC preventive therapy in a "real world" setting is still scanty. This study aimed at investigating whether there is any relationship between DOAC plasma levels and the stroke occurrence, on the basis of the phenotypic classification and pathophysiology of the stroke, in a cohort of DOAC-treated patients admitted to our hospital for AIS over 1-year period. A total of 28 patients had DOAC plasma levels determined in emergency and were included in the study, nine patients receiving dabigatran, 11 rivaroxaban and 8 apixaban. The DOAC levels were low in 8/28 patients (28.6% of the sample), intermediate in 4 (14.3%) and high in 16 (57.1%). The most prevalent stroke subtype was the small vessel disease, according to the A-S-C-O phenotypic classification, in 53.6% of our sample. The most common clinical presentation was "minor stroke" in 71.4% of the cases. There was a significantly higher proportion of patients with high DOAC levels in the small vessel group, compared to the cardioembolic group without other phenotypes. The question arises as to the most suitable clinical management of AIS in these patients on DOACs. In the current absence of clear evidence, taking into account the DOAC levels (low/intermediate/high) and the underlying stroke pathophysiology, we present a flowchart of our proposed clinical management of ischemic stroke in patients while on DOAC.

Global thromboelastometry in patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants: the RO-DOA study.

Rapidly available tests might be useful to measure the anticoagulant effect of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAs) in emergency situations as bleedings, surgery, or before thrombolysis. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of DOAs on global thromboelastometry (ROTEM). Coagulation parameters assessed at peak and trough in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation receiving apixaban, dabigatran or rivaroxaban at steady-state (patients) were compared to those of healthy volunteers (controls). Citrated blood samples were tested by ROTEM using diluted EXTEM assay, with and without the addition of an anti-FXa catcher, and using ECATEM-B, with and without the addition of an anti-FIIa catcher. Overall 30 patients (10 for each DOA) and 15 controls were included. The mean clotting time (CT) of patients at peak and trough were significantly higher compared to controls. The mean CT was significantly shortened after the addition of the anti-FXa catcher to apixaban (p = 0.005 for peak and p = 0.009 for trough) and to rivaroxaban samples (p = 0.005 for both peak and trough) and after the addition of anti-FIIa cather to dabigatran samples (p = 0.005 for both peak and trough). ROC curve analyses showed a good accuracy for CT and for CT/CT + catcher (CTc) in measuring dabigatran anticoagulant activity (AUC 1.000 and 0.993, respectively); for CT, CT/CTc and clot formation time (CFT)/CFT + catcher (CFTc) in measuring both apixaban activity (0.917, 0.880 and 0.880, respectively) and rivaroxaban activity (0.973, 0.987 and 0.860, respectively). In this study the use of ad-hoc designed reagents and catcher molecules was able to accurately identify DOAs activity at ROTEM.

Associations between model-predicted rivaroxaban exposure and patient characteristics and efficacy and safety outcomes in the prevention of venous thromboembolism.

Anticoagulant plasma concentrations and patient characteristics might affect the benefit-risk balance of therapy. The study objective was to assess the impact of model-predicted rivaroxaban exposure and patient characteristics on outcomes in patients receiving rivaroxaban for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis (VTE-P) after hip/knee replacement surgery. Post hoc exposure-response analyses were conducted using data from the phase 3 RECORD1-4 studies, in which 12,729 patients were randomized to rivaroxaban 10 mg once daily or enoxaparin for ≤ 39 days. Multivariate regression approaches were used to correlate model-predicted individual rivaroxaban exposures and patient characteristics with outcomes. In the absence of measured rivaroxaban exposure, exposure estimates were predicted based on individual increases in prothrombin time (PT) and by making use of the known correlation between rivaroxaban plasma concentration and dynamics of PT. No significant associations between rivaroxaban exposure and total VTE or major bleeding were identified. A significant association between exposure and a composite of major or non-major clinically relevant (NMCR) bleeding from day 4 after surgery was observed. The relationship was shallow, with an approximate predicted absolute increase in a composite of major or NMCR bleeding from 1.08 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76-1.54] to 2.18% (95% CI 1.51-3.17) at the 5th and 95th percentiles of trough plasma concentration, respectively. In conclusion, based on the underlying data and analysis, no reliable target window for exposure with improved benefit-risk could be identified within the investigated exposure range. Hence, monitoring rivaroxaban levels is unlikely to be beneficial in VTE-P.

Associations between model-predicted rivaroxaban exposure and patient characteristics and efficacy and safety outcomes in the treatment of venous thromboembolism.

Anticoagulant plasma concentrations and patient characteristics might affect the benefit-risk balance of therapy. This study assessed the impact of model-predicted rivaroxaban exposure and patient characteristics on outcomes in patients receiving rivaroxaban for venous thromboembolism treatment (VTE-T) using data from the phase 3 EINSTEIN-DVT and EINSTEIN-PE studies. In the absence of measured rivaroxaban exposure, exposure estimates were predicted based on individual increases in prothrombin time (PT) and the known correlation between rivaroxaban plasma concentrations and PT dynamics. The composite efficacy outcomes evaluated were recurrent deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) and recurrent DVT, PE and all-cause death; safety outcomes were major bleeding and the composite of major or non-major clinically relevant (NMCR) bleeding. Exposure-response relationships were evaluated using multivariate logistic and Cox regression for the twice-daily (BID) and once-daily (OD) dosing periods, respectively. Predicted rivaroxaban exposure and CrCl were significantly associated with both efficacy outcomes in the BID period. In the OD period, exposure was significantly associated with recurrent DVT and PE but not recurrent DVT, PE and all-cause death. The statistically significant exposure-efficacy relationships were shallow. Exposure-safety relationships were absent within the investigated exposure range. During both dosing periods, low baseline hemoglobin and prior bleeding were associated with the composite of major or NMCR bleeding. In conclusion, based on the underlying data and analysis, no reliable target window for exposure with improved benefit-risk could be identified within the investigated exposure range. Therefore, monitoring rivaroxaban levels is unlikely to be beneficial in VTE-T.