Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 502
Filter
1.
Tob Control ; 29(5): 564-569, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31413150

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Adult smoking prevalence in Minnesota fell from 21.8% in 1997 to 15.2% in 2016. This reduction improved heart and lung health, prevented cancers, extended life and reduced healthcare costs, but quantifying these benefits is difficult. METHODS: 1.3 million individuals were simulated in a tobacco policy model to estimate the gains to Minnesotans from 1998 to 2017 in health, medical spending reductions and productivity gains due to reduced cigarette smoking. A constant prevalence scenario was created to simulate the tobacco harms that would have occurred had smoking prevalence stayed at 1997 levels. Those harms were compared with tobacco harms from a scenario of actual smoking prevalence in Minnesota from 1998 to 2017. RESULTS: The simulation model predicts that reducing cigarette smoking from 1998 to 2017 has prevented 4560 cancers, 31 691 hospitalisations for cardiovascular disease and diabetes, 12 881 respiratory disease hospitalisations and 4118 smoking-attributable deaths. Minnesotans spent an estimated $2.7 billion less in medical care and gained $2.4 billion in paid and unpaid productivity, inflation adjusted to 2017 US$. In sensitivity analysis, medical care savings ranged from $1.7 to $3.6 billion. CONCLUSIONS: Minnesota's investment in comprehensive tobacco control measures has driven down smoking rates, saved billions in medical care and productivity costs and prevented tobacco related diseases of its residents. The simulation method employed in this study can be adapted to other geographies and time periods to bring to light the invisible gains of tobacco control.


Subject(s)
Health Care Costs/history , Health Expenditures/history , Smoking Cessation , Smoking , Tobacco Products , Adult , Female , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Humans , Male , Minnesota , Smoking/economics , Smoking/history , Smoking Cessation/economics , Smoking Cessation/history , Tobacco Products/economics , Tobacco Products/history
2.
Tob Control ; 29(5): 548-555, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31363061

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Nepal was a monarchy, then a dictatorship, then a democracy. This paper reviews how tobacco control progressed in Nepal in the context of these changes in government from 1950 through 2006. METHODS: We triangulated tobacco industry documents, newspaper articles and key informant interviews. RESULTS: Until 1983, the tobacco industry was mostly state owned. Transnational tobacco companies entered the Nepalese market through ventures with Surya Tobacco Company Private Limited (with Imperial Tobacco Company and British American Tobacco) in 1983 and Seti Cigarette Factory Limited (with Philip Morris International [PMI]) in 1985. Seminars and conferences on tobacco, celebrations of World No Tobacco Day (WNTD) and efforts by WHO helped promote tobacco control in Nepal beginning in the 1970s. Tobacco advocates in Nepal pushed the government to issue executive orders banning smoking in public places in 1992 and tobacco advertising in electronic media in 1998, and to introduce a tobacco health tax in 1993. The tobacco industry lobbied against these measures and succeeded in keeping the tobacco tax low by challenging it in court. Tobacco advocates sued the government in 2003 and 2005, resulting in a June 2006 Supreme Court decision upholding the smoking and advertising bans and requiring the government to enact a comprehensive tobacco control law. CONCLUSIONS: Political instability, conflict, weak governance and the dictatorship significantly affect tobacco control activities in low-income and middle-income countries. Nepal shows that tobacco control advocates can take advantage of global events, such as WNTD, and use domestic litigation to maintain support from civil societies and to advocate for stronger tobacco control policies.


Subject(s)
Government Regulation/history , Smoking Prevention , Smoking , Tobacco Industry , Tobacco Products/history , Advertising/history , Advertising/legislation & jurisprudence , Commerce , Government/history , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Humans , Lobbying , Nepal/epidemiology , Smoking/epidemiology , Smoking/history , Smoking Prevention/history , Smoking Prevention/legislation & jurisprudence , Taxes/history , Taxes/legislation & jurisprudence , Tobacco Industry/history , Tobacco Industry/legislation & jurisprudence
3.
Twin Res Hum Genet ; 22(6): 753-756, 2019 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31608855

ABSTRACT

The Mid-Atlantic Twin Registry (MATR) is a population-based registry of more than 60,000 twins primarily born or living in Virginia, North Carolina and South Carolina. Researchers may utilize the MATR for administration of research services, including study recruitment, data or sample (e.g., DNA) collection, archival dataset creation, as well as data collection through mailed, phone or online surveys. In addition, the MATR houses the MATR Repository, with over 1700 DNA samples primarily from whole blood available for researchers interested in DNA genotyping. For over 40 years MATR twins have participated in research studies with investigators from a range of scientific disciplines and institutions. These studies, which have resulted in numerous publications, explored diverse topics, including substance use, smoking behaviors, developmental psychopathology, bullying, children's health, cardiovascular disease, cancer, the human microbiome, epigenetics of aging, children of twins and sleep homeostasis. Researchers interested in utilizing twins are encouraged to contact the MATR to discuss potential research opportunities.


Subject(s)
Registries , Twins/genetics , Bullying , Cardiovascular Diseases/genetics , Cardiovascular Diseases/history , Epigenesis, Genetic , Female , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Humans , Male , Neoplasms/genetics , Neoplasms/history , Smoking/genetics , Smoking/history , Substance-Related Disorders/genetics , Substance-Related Disorders/history , Universities , Virginia
4.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 276(1): 263-265, 2019 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30328499

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Sigmund Freud, the father of modern psychoanalysis, suffered from what was considered to be a malignant tumour spreading from the back of his palate. He underwent numerous surgical interventions and radiation therapy over the course of 16 years. Such a long survival casts a shadow of doubt on the diagnosis of oral cancer that was given to Freud. METHODS: The book "Freud: Living and Dying", in which the personal physician of Freud described in detail his patient's fight with oral cancer, was reviewed. Current and past evidence, as well as epidemiological data, on oral cancer and cocaine-induced midline destructive lesions were also reviewed. RESULTS: Tobacco and cocaine are both responsible for oral lesions and Freud was a dedicated cigar smoker as well as a user and defender of cocaine. Freud's medical records indicate that the main cause of Freud's oral disease was excessive smoking. On the other hand, the diagnosis of oral cancer does not seem to be entirely consistent with the 16-year-long survival of Freud. Freud used cocaine regularly in the 1890s, as reported by his personal physician, and it is possible that he continued taking it beyond that time period without feeling the need to inform his doctor. CONCLUSIONS: It is possible that the lesion that progressively and very slowly eroded the splanchnocranial structures of Freud was not a bona-fide cancerous malignancy, but rather, the necrotizing effect of cocaine use that has been previously reported to be responsible for some massive facial destructive lesions.


Subject(s)
Cocaine/history , Famous Persons , Mouth Neoplasms/history , Psychoanalysis/history , Smoking/history , Austria , Cocaine/adverse effects , History, 20th Century , Humans , Male , Mouth Neoplasms/etiology , Smoking/adverse effects
5.
Cancer Metastasis Rev ; 36(3): 411-423, 2017 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28801840

ABSTRACT

Head and neck cancer (head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC)) is a devastating disease. Patients require intensive treatment that is often disfiguring and debilitating. Those who survive are often left with poor speech articulation, difficulties in chewing and swallowing, and cosmetic disfigurement, as well as loss of taste. Furthermore, given that HNSCC survivors are frequently disabled and unable to return to work, the economic and societal costs associated with HNSCC are massive. HNSCC is one of many cancers that are strongly associated with tobacco use. The risk for HNSCC in smokers is approximately ten times higher than that of never smokers, and 70-80% of new HNSCC diagnoses are associated with tobacco and alcohol use. Tobacco products have been used for centuries; however, it is just within the last 60-70 years that we have developed an understanding of their damaging effects. This relatively recent understanding has created a pathway towards educational and regulatory efforts aimed at reducing tobacco use. Understanding the carcinogenic components of tobacco products and how they lead to HNSCC is critical to regulatory and harm reduction measures. To date, nitrosamines and other carcinogenic agents present in tobacco products have been associated with cancer development. The disruption of DNA structure through DNA adduct formation is felt to be a common mutagenic pathway of many carcinogens. Intense work pertaining to tobacco product constituents, tobacco use, and tobacco regulation has resulted in decreased use in some parts of the world. Still, much work remains as tobacco continues to impart significant harm and contribute to HNSCC development worldwide.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/epidemiology , Head and Neck Neoplasms/epidemiology , Smoking/epidemiology , Animals , Carcinogenesis , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/etiology , Head and Neck Neoplasms/etiology , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Humans , Smoking/adverse effects , Smoking/history , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck
6.
Tob Control ; 27(e1): e12-e18, 2018 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29330172

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To better understand the current embrace of long-term nicotine maintenance by British governmental agencies and tobacco harm reduction by several leading British public health organisations, describe the context and deliberations of the UK's first formal tobacco risk reduction programme: 'Product Modification'. METHODS: Analysis of previously secret tobacco industry documents, news archives and Parliamentary debate records. RESULTS: From 1972 to 1991, the British government sought to investigate safer smoking through the 'product modification programme'. The Independent Scientific Committee on Smoking and Health (ISCSH) advised the British government on these efforts and collaborated with the tobacco industry, with which government then negotiated to determine policy. The ISCSH operated from four industry-backed premises, which contributed to the ISCSH's support of safer smoking: (1) reduced toxicity indicates reduced risk; (2) collaboration with the tobacco industry will not undermine tobacco control; (3) nicotine addiction is unavoidable; (4) to curtail cigarette use, solutions must be consumer-approved (ie, profitable). These premises often undermined tobacco control efforts and placed the ISCSH at odds with broader currents in public health. The product modification programme was abandoned in 1991 as the European Community began requiring members to adopt upper tar limits, rendering the ISCSH redundant. POLICY IMPLICATIONS: Endorsements of reduced harm tobacco products share the same four premises that supported the product modification programme. Current tobacco harm reduction premises and policies supported by the British government and leading British public health organisations may reflect the historical influence of the tobacco industry.


Subject(s)
Harm Reduction , Health Policy/history , Health Policy/trends , Smoking/adverse effects , Smoking/history , Tobacco Products/standards , History, 20th Century , Humans , Tobacco Industry/history , Tobacco Products/history , United Kingdom
7.
J BUON ; 23(6): 1933-1938, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30610830

ABSTRACT

At the beginning of the 19th century, the alarming rise in tobacco consumption and its consequences in health preoccupied physicians. Several medical authors pointed out the harmful effects of smoking, enumerating related disorders. In 1821, the hygienist Alexandre Parent du Châtelet (1790-1835) and the chemist Félix d'Arcet (1814-1847), studied the effects of tobacco in health and concluded that it was a relatively healthy habit providing also a kind of immunity from contagious diseases. The tobacco controversy opened up and continued for almost 40 years. In 1861, the professor of surgery and politician Étienne-Frédéric Bouisson (1813-1884) in his work entitled: "Tribut à la chirurgie ou mémoires sur divers sujets de cette science" (Tribute to surgery or dissertations on various topics of this science) related for the first time tobacco consumption to oral cancer, applying medical statistics and analyzing meticulously all the available data.


Subject(s)
General Surgery/history , Neoplasms/history , Smoking/history , History, 19th Century , Humans , Neoplasms/etiology , Neoplasms/surgery , Smoking/adverse effects
8.
Am J Public Health ; 107(11): 1711-1717, 2017 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28933924

ABSTRACT

Using archival records of the Commissariat of Public Health, journals, and propaganda materials from the antismoking campaign of the Soviet 1920s, this article argues that the revolutionary state pursued an antitobacco policy unique in the world in its attack on tobacco use at a national scale. The commissar of public health, Nikolai Alexandrovich Semashko, attempted to severely curtail tobacco cultivation and production, limit tobacco sales, and create a public opinion against tobacco with a propaganda campaign. Even in failing in its farther-reaching goals, the policy proved one of the most forward in terms of antismoking propaganda and state-sponsored treatment regimens, with the distribution of antismoking posters, pamphlets, articles, plays, and films as well as the creation of special state-sponsored smoking-cessation programs that boasted high success rates.


Subject(s)
Health Promotion/history , Smoking/history , Health Policy/history , History, 20th Century , Humans , Russia , Smoking Prevention
9.
Am J Public Health ; 107(7): 1060-1067, 2017 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28520481

ABSTRACT

Electronic cigarettes are advertised as the latest technological gadget-the smoking equivalent of smart phones. I challenge this sense of novelty by tracing their history to the 1960s, when researchers at British American Tobacco first recognized that smokers' brains were dependent on nicotine. This discovery enabled British American Tobacco to develop a novel kind of smoking device under the codename "Ariel" between 1962 and 1967. Whereas filters were meant to eliminate specific harmful constituents of tobacco smoke, Project Ariel tried to reduce smoking to its alkaloid essence: nicotine. By heating instead of burning tobacco, the scientists working on Ariel managed to produce an aerosol smoking device that delivered nicotine with very little tar while retaining the look and feel of a cigarette. However, after receiving two patents for Ariel, British American Tobacco ultimately decided to abandon the project to avoid endangering cigarettes, its main product. Today, as e-cigarettes are surging in popularity, it is worth revisiting Ariel because it is not just an episode in the history of aerosol smoking devices but its starting point.


Subject(s)
Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems/history , Nicotine/adverse effects , Smoking/history , Tobacco Industry/history , Aerosols/adverse effects , Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems/instrumentation , History, 20th Century , Humans , Smoking/adverse effects , Nicotiana , United States
10.
Prev Med ; 100: 61-66, 2017 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28392251

ABSTRACT

Exposure to cigarette coupons is associated with smoking initiation and likelihood of cigarette purchase among adolescents. Some adolescents who are exposed to cigarette coupons take a step further by choosing to save or collect these coupons, a further risk factor for cigarette smoking. This study examines historical trends and disparities in cigarette coupon saving among adolescents in the United States from 1997 to 2013. National samples of 10th and 12th grade students (n=129,111) were obtained from Monitoring the Future surveys in 1997-2013. Prevalence of lifetime and current cigarette coupon saving was estimated in each year in the overall adolescent population, and in race/ethnicity, parent education level, sex, and urban/rural subgroups. Prevalence of lifetime and current cigarette coupon saving was then estimated in each year based on smoking status. Prevalence of cigarette coupon saving has decreased dramatically among adolescents; only 1.2% reported currently saving coupons in 2013. However, disparities in cigarette coupon saving remain with prevalence higher among rural, White, and low parental education level students. Adolescent smokers continue to save coupons at high rates; 21.2% had ever saved coupons and 6.9% currently saved coupons as of 2013. Despite overall declines in adolescent cigarette coupon saving, existing sociodemographic disparities and the considerably high prevalence of coupon saving among adolescent smokers suggest that cigarette coupons remain a threat to smoking prevention among youth. Additional research is needed to further elucidate longitudinal associations between cigarette coupon saving and smoking initiation and maintenance among adolescents.


Subject(s)
Advertising/methods , Marketing/statistics & numerical data , Smoking , Adolescent , Advertising/economics , Cross-Sectional Studies , Ethnicity/statistics & numerical data , Female , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Humans , Male , Marketing/economics , Marketing/history , Marketing/methods , Prevalence , Self Report , Smoking/epidemiology , Smoking/history , Smoking/trends , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States/epidemiology
11.
Tob Control ; 26(e2): e97-e105, 2017 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27852893

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Use of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) is increasing rapidly. Chinese pharmacist Hon Lik is frequently cited as inventing the modern e-cigarette in 2003. However, tobacco companies have developed electronic nicotine delivery systems since at least 1963. METHODS: We searched the University of California San Francisco Truth (formerly Legacy) Tobacco Industry Documents beginning with the terms 'electric cigarette' and 'electronic cigarettes', 'e-cigarette', 'smokeless cigarettes', 'nicotine aerosol', 'tobacco aerosol', and 'vaping' and then expanded the search using snowball sampling. We focused our analysis on Philip Morris (PM) documents discussing technology that aerosolised a nicotine solution because these devices resembled modern e-cigarettes. Over 1000 documents were reviewed; 40 were included in the final analysis. RESULTS: PM started developing a nicotine aerosol device in 1990 to address the health concerns and decreased social acceptability of smoking that were leading smokers to switch to nicotine replacement therapy. PM had developed a capillary aerosol generator that embodied basic e-cigarette technology in 1994, but in the mid-to-late 1990s focused on applying its aerosol technology to pharmaceutical applications because of uncertainty of how such products might affect potential Food and Drug Administration regulation of tobacco products. In 2001, PM resumed its work on a nicotine aerosol device, and in 2013, NuMark (a division of Altria, PM's parent company) released the MarkTen, a nicotine aerosol device. CONCLUSIONS: Rather than a disruptive technology, PM developed e-cigarette technology to complement, not compete with, conventional cigarettes and evade tobacco control regulations.


Subject(s)
Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems/history , Tobacco Industry/history , Tobacco Products/history , Vaping/history , Aerosols , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Humans , Nicotine/administration & dosage , Research/history , Smoking/history , Tobacco Use Cessation Devices/history
12.
Am J Public Health ; 106(7): 1200-7, 2016 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27196658

ABSTRACT

In the United States, state laws establish a minimum age of legal access (MLA) for most tobacco products at 18 years. We reviewed the history of these laws with internal tobacco industry documents and newspaper archives from 1860 to 2014. The laws appeared in the 1880s; by 1920, half of states had set MLAs of at least 21 years. After 1920, tobacco industry lobbying eroded them to between 16 and 18 years. By the 1980s, the tobacco industry viewed restoration of higher MLAs as a critical business threat. The industry's political advocacy reflects its assessment that recruiting youth smokers is critical to its survival. The increasing evidence on tobacco addiction suggests that restoring MLAs to 21 years would reduce smoking initiation and prevalence, particularly among those younger than 18 years.


Subject(s)
Smoking/history , Smoking/legislation & jurisprudence , Tobacco Industry/history , Tobacco Industry/legislation & jurisprudence , Adolescent , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , History, 19th Century , History, 20th Century , Humans , Tobacco Use Disorder/epidemiology , Tobacco Use Disorder/history , United States
13.
Tob Control ; 26(5): 489-490, 2016 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28093545

ABSTRACT

We aimed to examine smoking-related content in all 24 James Bond movies in the Eon Productions series from 1962 to 2015. There were favourable downward trends for any smoking by James Bond (p=0.015 for trend), and for tobacco-related spy-gadgetry (p=0.009). Around 20% of Bond's 60 sexual partners smoked in each decade, and most recently in 2012. There were regular mentions of smoking risks to health (starting from 1967) and product placement of branded packs was present in two movies. Overall, the persisting smoking content remains problematic from a public health perspective, especially given the popularity of this movie series.


Subject(s)
Motion Pictures/history , Smoking/history , Tobacco Products , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Humans , Smoking Cessation , Smoking Prevention
14.
J Community Health ; 41(3): 680-7, 2016 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26512014

ABSTRACT

While the effects of active smoking and second-hand smoke (SHS) are well documented, the concept of third-hand smoke (THS) is a relatively new phenomenon in the environmental and public health field. This notion was coined in 2009 (Winickoff et al. in Pediatrics 123(1):e74-e79, 2009) but was not really brought to light until the New York Times published an article on the topic (Rabin in A new cigarette hazard: 'third-hand smoke'. The New York Times, http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/03/health/research/03smoke.html?_r=0 , 2009). Research on THS is fairly new and currently only limited animal studies have been performed that explore the health impacts associated with an individual THS-specific component. The public at large has a limited understanding of this new concept. As such, attitudes and beliefs surrounding THS exposure are still immature. Future research must be conducted to facilitate hazard identification, exposure and risk assessment to address its health impact on susceptible populations and to differentiate THS versus active smoking and SHS. In addition, policies and laws concerning tobacco smoke will need to be reviewed, possibly revised with the role of THS considered as an indispensable component of a broader tobacco control strategy.


Subject(s)
Health Policy/legislation & jurisprudence , Smoking/legislation & jurisprudence , Tobacco Smoke Pollution/adverse effects , Health Policy/history , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Humans , Smoking/adverse effects , Smoking/history , Tobacco Smoke Pollution/legislation & jurisprudence , United States
15.
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci ; 70(1): 24-33, 2016 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26449875

ABSTRACT

In this narrative review, we explore the history of tobacco smoking, its associations and portrayal of its use with luxury and glamour in the past, and intriguingly, its subsequent transformation into a mass consumption industrialized product encouraged by advertising and film. Then, we describe the next phase where tobacco in parts of the world has become an unwanted product. However, the number of smokers is still increasing, especially in new markets, and increasingly younger individuals are being attracted to it, despite the well-known health consequences of tobacco use. We also explore current smoking behaviors, looking at trends in the prevalence of consumption throughout the world, discrimination against smokers, light and/or intermittent smokers, and the electronic cigarette (e-cigarette). We place these changes in the context of neuroscience, which may help explain why the cognitive effects of smoking can be important reinforcers for its consumption despite strong anti-smoking pressure in Western countries.


Subject(s)
Smoking/epidemiology , Smoking/psychology , Social Stigma , Brain/drug effects , Cognition/drug effects , Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems/psychology , Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems/statistics & numerical data , History, 16th Century , History, 17th Century , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , History, Ancient , Humans , Nicotine/pharmacology , Smoking/history , Smoking/trends
16.
Lancet ; 383(9930): 1771-9, 2014 May 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24461287

ABSTRACT

Worldwide, more than 1 billion people use tobacco, resulting in about 6 million deaths per year. The tobacco industry's documented history of subverting control efforts required innovative approaches by WHO--led by Gro Harlem Brundtland--including invocation of its constitutional authority to develop treaties. In 2003, WHO member states adopted the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC). In the decade since, 177 countries have ratified and started to implement its full provisions. Success has been tempered by new challenges. Tobacco use has fallen in countries that are members of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development but increased in low-income and middle-income countries, a result in no small part of illicit trade and cheap products from China and other unregulated state monopolies. This review of 50 years of policy development aimed at reducing the burden of disease attributable to tobacco reviews the origins and strategies used in forging the WHO FCTC, from the perspective of one who was there.


Subject(s)
International Cooperation/history , Smoking Prevention , Smoking/history , World Health Organization/history , Global Health/history , Global Health/trends , Health Policy/history , Health Policy/trends , Health Promotion/history , Health Promotion/trends , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Humans
17.
Annu Rev Public Health ; 36: 69-88, 2015 Mar 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25594331

ABSTRACT

Before World War II, epidemiology was a small discipline, practiced by a handful of people working mostly in the United Kingdom and in the United States. Today it is practiced by tens of thousands of people on all continents. Between 1945 and 1965, during what is known as its "classical" phase, epidemiology became recognized as a major academic discipline in medicine and public health. On the basis of a review of the historical evidence, this article examines to which extent classical epidemiology has been a golden age of an action-driven, problem-solving science, in which epidemiologists were less concerned with the sophistication of their methods than with the societal consequences of their work. It also discusses whether the paucity of methods stymied or boosted classical epidemiology's ability to convince political and financial agencies about the need to intervene in order to improve the health of the people.


Subject(s)
Epidemiologic Methods , Epidemiology/history , Chronic Disease/epidemiology , History, 20th Century , Humans , Infections/epidemiology , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Lung Neoplasms/etiology , Lung Neoplasms/history , Smoking/adverse effects , Smoking/epidemiology , Smoking/history , Socioeconomic Factors
18.
Health Expect ; 18(6): 2720-30, 2015 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25132055

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This paper investigates the change through time in the perception of smoking-related health harm and smoking behaviour from 1949 to 1981. BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT: A variety of common behaviours can be linked to chronic disease risk-smoking, over-eating, and excessive sitting, to name a few. Changing behaviours to reduce exposure to such risks can be an effort that spans generations and decades. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Respondents to Gallup Poll surveys in the United States from 1949, 1954, 1957, 1971, 1972, 1977 and 1981. METHODS: Graphical analysis and probit regression are used to investigate trends through time and statistical associations of smoking with the perception of smoking-related health risks and other socio-demographic variables. INTERVENTION AND MAIN VARIABLE STUDIED: Perceived smoking health risk. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Smoking participation. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Our findings include the proportions of individuals who were self-reported smokers fell between 1949 and 1981, from 0.48 to 0.34. Among smokers, the proportion who believed smoking was harmful increased from 0.52 in 1949 to 0.81 in 1981. By 1981, the proportion of non-smokers who believed smoking was harmful was 0.98. A negative association between belief in smoking harm and the decision to smoke was shown in regression analysis. This association became more pronounced over the three decades under study.


Subject(s)
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Smoking/epidemiology , Adult , Educational Status , Female , History, 20th Century , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Smoking/adverse effects , Smoking/history , Smoking/psychology , Taxes , Tobacco Products/economics , United States/epidemiology
19.
J Hist Med Allied Sci ; 70(2): 250-78, 2015 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25862749

ABSTRACT

Half a century ago, on January 11, 1964, the U.S. Surgeon General's office released a landmark report on the health consequences of smoking. That report received massive media attention and triggered a steadily growing number of federal, state, and local restrictions on the advertising, sale, and use of cigarettes. Little is known about the report's impact on American public opinion because all the timely public opinion polls that measured the report's impact were privately commissioned by the tobacco industry and were not made publicly available. A review of these polls shows that the 1964 Surgeon General's report had a large and immediate effect on Americans' beliefs that cigarettes were a cause of lung cancer and of heart disease. However, the report had less impact on public preferences for government action or on smoking rates.


Subject(s)
Public Opinion/history , Smoking/history , United States Public Health Service/standards , Attitude to Health , History, 20th Century , Humans , Smoking/adverse effects , Smoking/psychology , Smoking Prevention , United States , United States Public Health Service/history
20.
Przegl Lek ; 72(3): 155-7, 2015.
Article in Polish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26731875

ABSTRACT

The paper contain a brief historical introduction about tobacco and smoking trends among women over the years--from cigarettes introduction to the present (years 1840-2014). Particular attention was paid to the historical backgrounds and marketing strategies of tobacco companies, which tried to reach each of women. Moreover, this paper described the dangers of smoking, which have been proven by scientists over the years and the impact of this knowledge on the tobacco industry and cigarettes consumption by women.


Subject(s)
Smoking/epidemiology , Smoking/history , Women's Health/history , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , History, 19th Century , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Humans , Marketing , Prevalence , Tobacco Industry/history
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL