Stress, anxiety, and depression in infertile couples are not associated with a first IVF or ICSI treatment outcome.

BACKGROUND: Psychological distress may exert a negative influence on reproductive function of couples at reproductive age. Couples seeking assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment may have a higher prevalence of psychological distress than fertile couples. However, whether psychological distress is associated with the outcome of ART treatment remains unknown. We aimed to investigate the association of pre-treatment psychological distress and clinical pregnancy rate among infertility couples undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment. METHODS: This nested case-control study was conducted based on women who underwent their first fresh IVF or ICSI cycle in the Jiangsu Birth Cohort Study (JBC) between November 2015 and January 2019. A total of 150 women who did not obtain clinical pregnancy after first IVF or ICSI fresh embryo transfer were identified as cases, and a total of 300 age matched women who obtained clinical pregnancy were identified as controls. Conditional logistic regression analyses were used to investigate the association between psychological distress and the outcome of first IVF or ICSI treatment, adjusting for multiple potential confounders. RESULTS: No statistically significant association was observed between score of maternal symptoms of psychological distress and clinical pregnancy. Adjusted ORs of logistic regression were 1.00 (95% CI 0.97-1.03) for anxiety, 0.98 (95% CI 0.95-1.02) for depression, and 0.98 (95% CI 0.95-1.01) for perceived stress, respectively. When treat depression and anxiety as categorical variables, 62 (13.8%) were classified as clinical depression, 11 (2.4%) were classified as clinical anxiety, among 450 women in the present study. Psychological distress symptoms were also not associated with clinical pregnancy rate. Adjusted ORs of logistic regression were 0.27 (95% CI 0.03-2.33) for anxiety, 0.88 (95% CI 0.46-1.68) for depression, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings firstly indicated that psychological distress experienced prior to IVF/ICSI treatment was not associated with clinical pregnancy.

The mental health of mothers and fathers during pregnancy and early parenthood after successful oocyte donation treatment: A nested case-control study.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to compare the mental health problems between parents after oocyte donation treatment, after in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) with own gametes and after naturally conceiving (NC). MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a prospective, longitudinal questionnaire study. The study group consisted of 26 oocyte donation mothers and their matched IVF/ICSI (n = 52) and NC (n = 52) controls. Matching was performed according to mother's age, parity, type of pregnancy, and number of returned questionnaires. The parents filled-in the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-36) at gestational weeks 18-20 (T1), and at 2 months (T2) and 12 months (T3) after the childbirth. RESULTS: Full response rate (T1-T3) for oocyte donation mothers was 76.9% and for oocyte donation fathers was 73.1%. At T1, no significant differences were found between groups in depression, anxiety, sleeping difficulties, or social dysfunction, but they differed at T2 and T3 in anxiety (T2, P = .02; T3, P = .01), in sleeping difficulties (T2, P = .02; T3, P = .04) and in social dysfunction (T2, P = .01; T3, P = .04). Oocyte donation mothers showed less anxiety than NC mothers (T2, T3), and fewer sleeping difficulties and less social dysfunction than IVF/ICSI (T2, T3) and NC mothers (T2). Mental health problems of oocyte donation fathers did not differ from those of IVF/ICSI and NC control fathers at T1-T3. CONCLUSIONS: Oocyte donation mothers showed fewer mental health symptoms in early parenthood compared with IVF/ICSI and NC mothers. No differences were found among mothers during pregnancy and among fathers at any time point.

Quality of care in an IVF programme from a patient's perspective: development of a validated instrument.

STUDY QUESTION: Is it possible to develop a trustworthy instrument to evaluate the patient's perspective on fertility care and to document fully all methodological steps, including validation? SUMMARY ANSWER: A validated instrument has been developed for both women and men undergoing assisted reproduction to monitor the quality of care on a regular basis, similar to live birth rates and other effectiveness data. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY?: Within fertility care, several instruments have been developed, but many have significant methodological problems and few have been validated. Most instruments focus exclusively on women and no questionnaires have been directed at women and men separately. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE AND DURATION: The questionnaire specific to IVF treatments (QPP-IVF) is based on the theoretical foundation of the validated general instrument, quality of care from patients perspective (QPP), for both women and men. The QPP-IVF was developed and validated by quantitative methods. A two-centre study ran between September 2011 and May 2012. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: In all, 655 women and men participated. The measurements consisted of two kinds of evaluations: the rating of perceived reality of care and the rating of the subjective importance of various aspects of treatment. The questionnaire consisted of 43 items for women and 42 items for men. An exploratory factor analysis was performed for women for all items of subjective importance. Eigenvalue, explained variance and factor loading are given for each factor. Internal consistency of subscales was assessed by Cronbach's alpha, item discriminant validity and percentage scaling success. For external validity, a correlation with fertility quality of life (FertiQoL) was performed and for reliability, a test-retest analysis was carried out. Sensitivity analyses were performed by known-group analyses. All significance tests were two sided and conducted at the 5% significance level. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The QPP-IVF instrument, divided into four dimensions, seemed a valid and reliable way of measuring the quality of care from a patient's perspective, for both women and men. The item-scaling test confirmed 10 underlying factors, with scaling success in all subscales and Cronbach's alpha >0.70 for women in almost all subscales. It was somewhat lower for men but still acceptable. The external validity was acceptable, with significant correlation between QPP-IVF and FertiQoL. The test-retest analysis confirmed that QPP-IVF was a stable instrument, with intra-class correlation coefficients from 0.74 to 0.89 for women. Sensitivity analyses indicated a sensitive instrument. LIMITATIONS, REASON FOR CAUTION: The response rate to the questionnaire was 67.5%. Although considered acceptable in questionnaire studies, this response level might introduce a certain risk of selection bias. The questionnaire was developed and validated only in Sweden. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The QPP-IVF may be of use for purposes of quality improvement and national comparisons. Future studies should focus on establishing the QPP-IVF as a valuable instrument for measuring the quality of care outside Sweden. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST: The study was supported by the LUA/ALF agreement at Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden and by Hjalmar Svensson's Research Foundation. None of the authors declared any conflict of interests.

Are attachment dimensions associated with infertility-related stress in couples undergoing their first IVF treatment? A study on the individual and cross-partner effect.

STUDY QUESTION: Are attachment anxiety and avoidance dimensions in female and male partners in couples seeking infertility treatment associated with her and his infertility-related stress? SUMMARY ANSWER: Attachment dimensions are significantly associated with several aspects of infertility stress in couples undergoing IVF treatment. WHAT IS KNOWN AND WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: Attachment dimensions of anxiety and avoidance (where highly anxious individuals fear rejection and are preoccupied with maintaining proximity to their partner and highly avoidant individuals are uncomfortable with intimacy and prefer to maintain distance from their partner) may influence the well being of individuals undergoing IVF/ICSI treatment. This study showed that one partner's attachment dimensions had a direct effect on the infertility-related stress of the other partner. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of consecutive couples before starting their first IVF/ICSI treatment in 2009-2011 at the ANDROS clinic in Palermo, Italy. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: Three hundred and fifty-nine couples undergoing fertility treatments were invited to participate in the research. The final sample comprised 316 females and 316 males who filled out the psychological questionnaires (Experiences in Close Relationships; Fertility Problem Inventory; State scale of State-Trait Anxiety Inventory). The participants included patients who had a primary infertility diagnosis and were about to undergo their first IVF or ICSI treatment. DATA ANALYSIS METHOD: Paired t-tests were used to examine gender differences on the study variables (attachment anxiety, attachment avoidance, infertility stress, state anxiety, etc.). Associations between infertility-related stress and the study variables were explored using hierarchical stepwise multivariate linear regression analyses. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Attachment anxiety and attachment avoidance were significantly associated with global infertility stress in both women (ß = 0.24, P < 0.01 and ß = 0.27, P < 0.01) and men (ß = 0.23, P < 0.01 and ß = 0.37, P < 0.01). Regarding the cross-partner effects, men's infertility stress and relationship concerns were associated with their partners' attachment avoidance (ß = 0.10 P < 0.05 and ß = 0.12, P < 0.05); and the infertility stress of women and the scores for need of parenthood were associated with their partners' attachment anxiety (ß = 0.14 P < 0.05 and ß = 0.16, P < 0.05). BIAS, CONFOUNDING AND OTHER REASONS FOR CAUTION: The study data are cross sectional, and specifically focus on associations between adult attachment style and infertility stress. Treating the data from couples as independent observations may be a limitation of the analysis. Potential moderators of such relationships (e.g. coping strategies, stress appraisal) are not included in this study. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This research was supported by funds provided by Centro Andros S.r.l., Palermo, Italy. The authors declare no financial or commercial conflicts of interest in this study.

Psychological domain of quality of life, depression and anxiety levels in in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles of women with endometriosis: a prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the psychological domain of quality of life (PDQoL), anxiety and depression levels of infertile women with endometriosis versus non endometriosis who applied for Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART). METHOD: This prospective case-control study compromised a total of 105 women who applied for IVF/ICSI program. Ninety-three women were divided into two groups as endometriosis (n = 37) and non-endometriosis (n = 56) after 12 patients who refused to participate in the study were excluded. The WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire, Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventory scales were used to determine the psychological stress levels. RESULTS: A significant difference was found between the endometriosis and non-endometriosis groups regarding depression scores, while no significant difference was reported with respect to PDQoL and anxiety (p < 0.01, p = 0.897 and p = 0.058, respectively). A weak but significant correlation was observed between depression and endometriosis (CC: 0.435, p < 0.01). Though anxiety scores were found to be higher in endometriosis group this can not reach statistical significance (p = 0.058). Impact of PDQoL, depression and anxiety scores on pregnancy outcomes were found to be insignificant. CONCLUSION: Women with endometriosis seem to be more susceptible to depression and anxiety than women without endometriosis. Although infertility treatment outcomes are not found to be significantly affected, the impact of depression and anxiety over ART treatment success merit further research.

Attitudes of Klinefelter men and their relatives towards TESE-ICSI.

PURPOSE: At the start of the implementation of TESE-ICSI for Klinefelter men in the Netherlands, we aimed to evaluate their wish to father children and their attitudes towards this artificial reproduction technique. METHODS: Questionnaires were distributed to members of the Dutch Klinefelter Association (n = 365) and to Klinefelter cases known at our Department (n = 58). Questions addressed several aspects: socio-demographic characteristics, ascertainment of diagnosis, children and child wish, and TESE-ICSI. Data were characterized using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: A total of 260 questionnaires (corresponding to 194 cases, 46%) were returned. A possible wish to father children was reported by 90% of Klinefelter men. 70% of Klinefelter men and 74% of their partners would (probably) opt for TESE-ICSI. CONCLUSION: The majority of Dutch Klinefelter men and their partners desire to have children and have a positive attitude towards TESE-ICSI. Concerns include the risk of congenital malformations/developmental delay of the child and the limited success rate of TESE-ICSI.

The social adaptation of children born after ICSI compared with IVF-conceived children: a study from China.

We compared the social adjustment among Chinese children born after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) vs those after in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and identify factors related to the adjustment. The social adaptation of 86 ICSI and 165 IVF conceived children of 4-6 years of age was assessed using the Infants-Junior Middle School Students' Social-Life Abilities Scale. There was no significant difference between the ICSI and IVF-conceived groups on the item of communication, self-dependence, locomotion, work skills, socialisation, self-management and total scores. Compared with routine IVF, ICSI does no harm to the social adaptation of children conceived through this technology.

Trajectories and predictors of anxiety and depression amongst infertile women during their first IVF/ICSI treatment cycle.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to identify anxiety and depression trajectories of infertile women during first IVF treatment cycle and to examine whether the identified trajectories were associated with baseline psychological predictors, namely fertility-related stress, resilience, and illness perception. METHODS: A longitudinal prospective study was conducted to assess anxiety and depression using the Chinese version of Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and Self-Rating depression Scale (SDS) at four different time points: the day of first IVF/ICSI appointment (baseline/T1), the first day of ovarian stimulation (T2), the one day before oocyte retrieval (T3), and the day of fresh embryo transfer (T4). Final analysis was done on data obtained from 202 infertile women. Latent class growth mixed modeling was carried out to identify anxiety and depression trajectories. Multinomial logistic regressions were conducted to investigate predictors of trajectory membership. RESULTS: Three different adjustment trajectories were identified amongst infertile women during their first IVF/ICSI treatment cycle. A total of 40.1 and 37.6% of women showed normal levels of anxiety and depression (resilient trajectories), respectively, 45.0 and 43.1% of women had recovery trajectories, and 14.9 and 19.3% of women had chronic anxiety and depression trajectories. Non-resilient trajectories were associated with relatively shorter duration of infertility, higher fertility-related stress, and lower resilience. CONCLUSION: The results imply that it is possible to identify women in chronic or recovery trajectories on the day of first IVF/ICSI appointment, so that tailored prevention strategies integrated components that attenuate stress appraisal and strengthen resilience should be implemented to target those individuals.

Depressive symptoms, anxiety, and quality of life of Japanese women at initiation of ART treatment.

Assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment accounted for 6% of total births in 2017 and is increasing which places Japan among the top worldwide in number of treatments performed. Although ART treatment patients often experience heavy physical and psychological burden, few epidemiologic studies have been conducted in Japan. We examined mental health and health-related quality of life (QOL) among women at early stages of treatment. We recruited 513 women who have initiated ART treatment, either in-vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection, from four medical facilities in the Tokyo area and through web-based approaches. At baseline, we collected socio-demographic information and assessed depressive symptoms, anxiety, and QOL. Descriptive analyses were performed overall and stratified by factors such as age. Mild depressive symptoms or worse, assessed with Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms, were observed among 54% of participants. Mean score for State-Trait Anxiety Inventory was 52 with a standard deviation of 11 for the state, and 39% were categorized as high anxiety. QOL results, assessed with SF-12, showed the same negative tendency for social functioning and role (emotional), while general health and physical functioning were consistent with the national average. Young participants appeared to suffer mentally more than older participants (p < 0.01 for depressive symptoms). Our findings suggest that patients may be at high risk of depressive symptoms, high anxiety, and low QOL even from the early stages of ART treatment.

Anxiety and depression have no influence on the cancellation and pregnancy rates of a first IVF or ICSI treatment.

BACKGROUND: After many years of research, the impact of psychological distress on the IVF treatment outcome is still unclear. This study aimed to determine the influences of anxiety and depression before and during IVF or ICSI treatment on the cancellation and pregnancy rates of inductees. METHODS: In a multicentre prospective cohort study, we assessed anxiety and depression at baseline and the procedural anxiety level one day before oocyte retrieval, with the short versions of the State Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and the Beck Depression Inventory-Primary Care (BDI-PC). The effect of baseline anxiety and depression on the cancellation and pregnancy rates of 783 women in their first IVF or ICSI treatment was evaluated. We also determined if a change in anxiety from the start of treatment until just before oocyte retrieval affects the pregnancy rate. The predictive value of distress was assessed while controlling for several factors in subfertility treatment. RESULTS: Neither baseline nor procedural anxiety, nor depression affected the ongoing pregnancy rates, with odds ratios (ORs) of 1.04 (95% CI 0.82-1.33), 0.96 (95% CI 0.77-1.20) and 0.85 (95% CI 0.65-1.10), respectively. Neither did the anxiety gain score affect the pregnancy rate, OR 1.08 (95% CI 0.83-1.41). A cancellation of treatment could not be predicted by either anxiety or depression, OR 1.16 (95% CI 0.83-1.63) and 0.85 (95% CI 0.59-1.22), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Inductees in IVF treatment can be reassured that anxiety and depression levels before and during treatment have no significant influence on the cancellation and pregnancy rates.

Role of religion, spirituality, and faith in assisted reproduction.

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of the patient's faith, religion, and spirituality on the outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles. Materials and methods: Eight hundred and seventy-seven patients received a questionnaire containing information on faith, religiosity, and spirituality and the results of the questionnaires were correlated with ICSI outcomes. Patients stated to be Catholic (n = 476), spiritists (n = 93), Evangelical (n = 118), and other religion (n = 32), and 78 did not identify with any religious group. Results: A significant increase in fertilization, high-quality embryos, and pregnancy rate was found among Spiritists and Evangelicals. Patients who included the infertility diagnosis and treatment in their prayers showed an increased pregnancy rate, and those who reported their faith to be affected by the infertility diagnosis presented a decreased high-quality embryos rate. The high-quality embryos rate was increased among patients who answered that their faith contributed to their decision to undergo infertility treatment. The cycle's cancelation was negatively correlated with the frequency of religious meetings, and the frequency of prayers was positively correlated with the response to ovarian stimulation. Finally, belief in treatment success positively influenced the embryo quality. Conclusion: The findings suggest that spirituality plays a role in adjusting the psychological aspects of an infertile patient.

Smartphone-supported Positive Adjustment Coping Intervention (PACI) for couples undergoing fertility treatment: a randomised controlled trial protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Infertility generally counts as a profound crisis in the lives of couples and as an emotionally stressful experience. For couples undergoing fertility treatment, this is especially true of the waiting period following embryo transfer, which couples say is the most stressful period during treatment. However, at this specific phase, psychosocial counselling is not always available on the spot. The aim of this randomised controlled trial (RCT) study was to test the Positive Adjustment Coping Intervention (PACI), a low-dose, smartphone-supported psychological intervention for women and men undergoing fertility treatment. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The effectiveness of PACI is tested by means of a prospective two-arm RCT. During the 14-day waiting period between oocyte puncture/oocyte thawing and pregnancy test, participants are randomly assigned to one of the two groups, and both women and men receive daily text messages on their smartphones. One group receives text messages with statements reflecting positive-adjustment coping attitudes, the other group messages containing cognitive distractions. The primary outcome of this study is the reduction of psychosocial burden during the waiting period of reproductive treatment. Furthermore, we want to assess whether there are differences between the interventions in a pre-post assessment. The secondary outcomes are information on perceived effectiveness and practicability of the intervention one month after the waiting period. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been obtained from the Ethics Committee of Heidelberg University Faculty of Medicine (S-074/2017). Study findings are planned for dissemination via peer-reviewed journal articles and at national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03118219; Pre-results. PROTOCOL VERSION: Version 2.0 dated 18/02/2019.

Absence from work and emotional stress in women undergoing IVF or ICSI: an analysis of IVF-related absence from work in women and the contribution of general and emotional factors.

OBJECTIVE: To assess productivity losses due to absence from work during in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) treatment and to describe the pattern of IVF-related absence from work. Additionally, the influence of general and psychological variables on IVF-related absence from work was analyzed. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Eight IVF hospitals participated in the study. SAMPLE: Women undergoing their first treatment with IVF/ICSI. METHODS: The Health and Labour Questionnaire (HLQ) was used to estimate the costs of IVF-related absence from work (n=384). Diaries were used to collect background information and reasons for IVF-related absence. Psychological data were derived using the Spielberger State and Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), the Beck Depression Inventory for Primary Care (BDI-PC) and the Inventory Social Relations and the Illness Cognition Questionnaire. Regression analyses were performed using two models, one without and one with psychological data, to assess the impact of the different variables on IVF-related absence from work. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: IVF-related absence from work and the costs of productivity losses due to IVF/ICSI per treatment. RESULTS: Overall absence from work during IVF/ICSI treatment was on average 33 hours, of which 23 hours were attributed to IVF/ICSI. Costs of productivity losses due to IVF/ICSI were euro596 per woman. Significant predictors of IVF-related absence from work were the number of hours of paid work, age and self-reported physical and/or emotional problems due to IFV treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Women experiencing emotional complaints and women with physical complaints due to IVF/ICSI reported significantly more IVF-related absence from work.

The influence of emotional distress on the outcome of in-vitro fertilization (IVF) and/or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment among infertile Turkish women.

BACKGROUND: To determine whether the emotional distress of infertile Turkish women is related to social support and influences the outcome of their IVF and/or ICSI treatment. METHODS: The Beck Depression Inventory, State- Trait Anxiety Inventory, and Social Support scales were administered to 104 primary infertile Turkish women before the date of their embryo transfer. Comparisons were made between the women who became pregnant and those who did not following the embryo transfer. RESULTS: Compared to the pregnant women, the non-pregnant women had a greater number of emotional symptoms despite similar levels of social support. Also, the increased severity of depressive symptoms and higher levels of anxiety were predictive of low pregnancy rates. CONCLUSION: The pregnancy rate of infertile Turkish women was associated with emotional distress and low levels of social support were associated with increased emotional distress. Further research is needed to determine the factors and mechanisms that contribute to emotional distress in the treatment of infertility.

[The development of children from assisted reproduction--a review of the literature]. / Die Entwicklung von Kindern aus assistierten Befruchtungen Eine Ubersicht der Studienlage.

Based on a systematic review of the recent literature (2000-2006) we describe the results of 22 empirical studies of the development of children born after assisted reproduction. We considered the somatic, functional and psychosocial development and found some consistent outcomes. With regard to the somatic health, higher incidences of perinatal complications, major birth defects and chromosomal aberrations are repeatedly described. In most cases the studies of the functional and psychosocial development found no statistically differences to naturally conceived children. However some preliminary results demonstrate tendencies to emotional symptoms. The findings suggest the well-being and well-functioning of these children, but further empirical data especially to assess the psychosocial development are needed, especially for schoolage children and adolescents.

Effect of the previous reproductive outcomes in subfertile women after in vitro fertilization (IVF) and/or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatments on perinatal anxious and depressive symptomatology.

INTRODUCTION: The present study aims to investigate the effects of previous reproductive outcomes on the levels of depression, anxiety and perceived social support in subfertile women who conceived after in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was developed. Data were collected on subfertile patients who conceived after IVF/ICSI treatment. All demographic and clinical data were recorded. The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Y and the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support at 22 and 32 weeks of gestation and 15 days after delivery were completed. Data were analyzed comparing patients who conceived at their first IVF/ICSI cycle, after one unsuccessful ARTs cycle, and after multiple unsuccessful IVF/ICSI cycles. RESULTS: A significant increase in state anxiety and depression scores from 22 gestational weeks of gestation to 15 days after delivery was observed in patients who received multiple unsuccessful IVF/ICSI cycles compared with other groups. No significant difference in perceived social support was detected among groups. The differences in depression and anxiety scores remained consistent after controlling for perceived social support. DISCUSSION: A history of unsuccessful IVF/ICSI treatments seems to leave women more vulnerable in facing the duties of the new parental role. Such possibility underlies the importance of the availability of a psychological support for these women, even after a successful medical treatment for infertility.

Validation study of the SCREENIVF: an instrument to screen women or men on risk for emotional maladjustment before the start of a fertility treatment.

OBJECTIVE: To examine construct and criterion validity of the Dutch SCREENIVF among women and men undergoing a fertility treatment. DESIGN: A prospective longitudinal study nested in a randomized controlled trial. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENT(S): Couples, 468 women and 383 men, undergoing an IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment in a fertility clinic, completed the SCREENIVF. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Construct and criteria validity of the SCREENIVF. RESULT(S): The comparative fit index and root mean square error of approximation for women and men show a good fit of the factor model. Across time, the sensitivity for Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale subscale in women ranged from 61%-98%, specificity 53%-65%, predictive value of a positive test (PVP) 13%-56%, predictive value of a negative test (PVN) 70%-99%. The sensitivity scores for men ranged from 38%-100%, specificity 71%-75%, PVP 9%-27%, PVN 92%-100%. A prediction model revealed that for women 68.7% of the variance in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale on time 1 and 42.5% at time 2 and 38.9% at time 3 was explained by the predictors, the sum score scales of the SCREENIVF. For men, 58.1% of the variance in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale on time 1 and 46.5% at time 2 and 37.3% at time 3 was explained by the predictors, the sum score scales of the SCREENIVF. CONCLUSION(S): The SCREENIVF has good construct validity but the concurrent validity is better than the predictive validity. SCREENIVF will be most effectively used in fertility clinics at the start of treatment and should not be used as a predictive tool.

Reasons for dropout in an in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection program.

OBJECTIVE: To gain more insight into psychological aspects of dropping out from IVF-ICSI. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: University hospital-based tertiary care fertility clinic. PATIENT(S): Women entering their first treatment cycle of IVF or ICSI. INTERVENTION(S): Standardized psychological questionnaires were administered before the start of the treatment and after treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Reasons for dropout, state and trait anxiety, depression, and marital and sexual satisfaction. RESULT(S): Baseline psychological factors and the probability of dropout after IVF-ICSI treatment were found to be associated in the group that stopped treatment for psychological reasons. Those who were denied further treatment by the medical team, the "actively censored" group, did not show pretreatment differences regarding psychological measures in comparison with those who continued treatment. After treatment, the group that was denied further treatment showed higher levels of anxiety and depression compared with those that continued. CONCLUSION(S): Dropout, being a well-known phenomenon in IVF-ICSI, is related to preexisting psychological factors in IVF-ICSI. Actively censored patients were psychologically well-adjusted before treatment, but this changed after censoring.