Evaluation of the telephone and clinical NHS urgent dental service in Sheffield.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate an NHS in- and out-of-hours urgent dental service (UDS) including both a telephone triage provider (TTP) and a sole clinical provider (CP) using a quality framework. BASIC RESEARCH DESIGN: Analysis of activity and patient experience data. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Ratio of volume of services to activity provided; distance and time travelled; appropriateness of referrals and treatments; equity of utilisation; patient experience; cost per patient. RESULTS: Almost all calls (96.6%) to the TTP were answered within 60 seconds and of people referred to the CP 96.0% needed treatment. Proportionately more people from deprived areas used the TTP. Highest utilisation of the TTP was by people aged 20 to 44 years and lowest was by people over 54 years. Cost per patient utilising the TTP was £5.06. Of the available appointments provided by the CP, 90.9% were booked the TTP. Travel time to the CP was less than 30 minutes for 78.0% of patients. Of treatments provided, 77.9% were clinical interventions and 18.1% were prescription only. Proportionately more people from deprived areas attended the CP. Highest utilisation was by people aged 20 to 44 years and lowest by people over 54 years. Nearly half (47.0%) of those attending reported they did not have a dentist. There was a high level of patient satisfaction. Cost per course of treatment at the CP was £67.41. CONCLUSION: Overall the UDS provided a high quality service in line with Maxwell's dimensions of quality. Timely advice and treatment was provided with high levels of patient satisfaction with the CP. Comparison with other urgent dental service models would determine the relative efficiency of the UDS.

The State of UK Dental Anaesthesia: Results From The NAP5 Activity Survey. A national survey by the 5th National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland.

The National Health Service anaesthesia annual activity (2013) was recently reported by the Fifth National Audit Program of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland. Within a large dataset were 620 dental cases. Here, we describe this data subset. The estimated annual dental caseload was 111,600:60% were children (< 16 y), 38.5% adults (16 - 65y) and 1.5% the elderly (> 65y). Almost all were elective day procedures (97%) and ASA 1 or 2 patients (95%).The most senior anaesthetist present was a Consultant in 82% and a non-career grade doctor in 14%.Virtually all (98%) cases were conducted during GA. Propofol was used to induce anaesthesia in almost all adults compared with 60% of children. Propofol maintenance was used in 5% of both children and adults. Almost all adults received an opioid (including remifentanil) compared with only 40% of children. Thirty one per cent of children had a GA for a dental procedure without either opioid or LA supplementation. Approximately 50% of adults and 16% of children received a tracheal tube: 20% of children needed only anaesthesia by face mask. These data show that anaesthetists almost always use general anaesthesia for dental procedures and this exposes difficulties in training of anaesthetists in sedation techniques. Dentists, however, are well known to use sedation when operating alone and our report provides encouragement for a comprehensive survey of dental sedation and anaesthesia practice in both NHS and non-NHS hospitals and clinics in the UK.

Short Report. Audit of Conscious Sedation Provision in a Salaried Dental Service.

Clinical audit is a tool that may be used to improve the quality of care and outcomes for patients in a health care setting as well as a mechanism for clinicians to reflect on their performance. The audit described in this short report involved the collection and analysis of data related to the administration of 1,756 conscious sedations, categorised as standard techniques, by clinicians employed by an NHS Trust-based dental service during the year 2014. Data collected included gender, age and medical status of subject, the type of care delivered, the dose of drug administered and the quality of the achieved sedation and any sedation-related complications. This was the first time that a service-wide clinical audit had been undertaken with the objective of determining the safety and effectiveness of this aspect of care provision. Evaluation of the analysed data supported the perceived view that such care was being delivered satisfactorily. This on-going audit will collect data during year 2016 on the abandonment of clinical sessions, in which successful sedation had been achieved, due to the failure to obtain adequate local anaesthesia.

Treatment provided in the Public Dental Service in Finland in 2009.

OBJECTIVES: To analyse treatment measures provided in the Public Dental Service (PDS) and to discuss the therapy given against treatment needs as expressed in the national clinical epidemiological studies. METHODS: In 2009, the Chief Dentists of the PDS units collected data from their local registers on patients and treatment provided. Data were obtained from 166 PDS units (86%). Treatment patterns were compared between age groups, provider groups and geographical areas using chi-square tests. RESULTS: Altogether 8.9 million treatments were provided for 1.7 million patients. Examinations, restorative treatment and anaesthesia accounted for 61.3% of all treatments. Preventive measures (8.4%) and periodontal treatment (6.3%) were small proportions of the total. Prosthetic treatment was uncommon (0.5%). Working age adults received half of all treatments (53.2%), the young a third (36.4%) and the elderly 10.4%. Dental hygienists or dental assistants provided 29.7% of all treatment for children and adolescents, 11.1% for adults and 14.1% for the elderly. CONCLUSION: Relatively healthy children had plenty of examinations and preventive measures, and adults had mostly restorative care when their needs were more periodontal and prosthetic care, indicating that treatment given was not fully in line with needs.

Weighing up the weighted case mix tool (WCMT): a psychometric investigation using confirmatory factor analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the use of the WCMT in two Scottish health boards and to consider the impact of simplifying the tool to improve efficient use. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of routine WCMT data (47,276 cases). CLINICAL SETTING: Public Dental Service (PDS) within NHS Lothian and Highland. METHOD: The WCMT consists of six criteria. Each criterion is measured independently on a four-point scale to assess patient complexity and the dental care for the disabled/impaired patient. Psychometric analyses on the data-set were conducted. Conventional internal consistency coefficients were calculated. Latent variable modelling was performed to assess the 'fit' of the raw data to a pre-specified measurement model. A Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was used to test three potential changes to the existing WCMT that included, the removal of the oral risk factor question, the removal of original weightings for scoring the Tool, and collapsing the 4-point rating scale to three categories. RESULTS: The removal of the oral risk factor question had little impact on the reliability of the proposed simplified CMT to discriminate between levels of patient complexity. The removal of weighting and collapsing each item's rating scale to three categories had limited impact on reliability of the revised tool. The CFA analysis provided strong evidence that a new, proposed simplified Case Mix Tool (sCMT) would operate closely to the pre-specified measurement model (the WMCT). CONCLUSIONS: A modified sCMT can demonstrate, without reducing reliability, a useful measure of the complexity of patient care. The proposed sCMT may be implemented within primary care dentistry to record patient complexity as part of an oral health assessment.

A five-year evaluation of an NHS dental practice-based specialist minor oral surgery service.

OBJECTIVE: To report the findings of an evaluation of an NHS dental practice-based minor oral surgery service. BASIC RESEARCH DESIGN: Service evaluation. CLINICAL SETTING: NHS specialist practice in England. PARTICIPANTS: Patients and referring practitioners. INTERVENTIONS: analysis of activity, patient and referring practitioner satisfaction data. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Numbers and case-mix treated; non-attendance; antibiotic prescribing; complication rates; patients and referring practitioner satisfaction. RESULTS: 5,796 treatment appointments were arranged, with a median waiting time from receipt of referral to treatment of 35 days. Treatment provided included: surgical removal of third molars and non-third molars, surgical endodontics and other surgical and oral medicine cases (28.3%, 53.3%, 3.5%, and 15.0% of cases, respectively). Antibiotics were prescribed at 13.1% of all treatment appointments and 2.5% required appointments for post-operativecomplications. All but one patient reported overall satisfaction and over 98% strongly agreed/agreed with positive attitudinal statements about the oral surgeon's communication/information giving, technical competence and understanding/acceptance. 70.1% of patients were seen on time and under 1% were seen more than 15 minutes late. Some 83.1% felt the standard of service was better than expected from a hospital and none felt it was worse. More than 85% of referring practitioners agreed that: waiting times were shorter than at the hospital; urgent problems were seen quickly; and, the referral process was easy and understandable. Over 98% either strongly agreed or agreed that they were happy with the service provided. CONCLUSIONS: A range of minor oral surgery procedures can be provided with low complication rates, short waiting times, acceptable accessibility and high levels of patient and referring practitioner satisfaction from a specialist NHS dental practice-based service.

Workforce skill mix: modelling the potential for dental therapists in state-funded primary dental care.

BACKGROUND: South Central Strategic Health Authority [SHA], with a population of four million, is one of 10 regions of England with responsibility for workforce planning. AIM: To explore future scenarios for the use of the skill mix within the dental team to inform the commissioning of dental therapy training. METHOD: Data on population demography, oral health needs and demands, dental workforce, activity and dental utilisation were used to create demand (needs-informed) and supply models. Population trends and changing oral health needs and dental service uptake were included in the demand model. Linear programming was used to obtain the optimal make-up of the dental team. Based on the optimal scenario, workforce volumes and costs were examined across a range of scenarios up to 2013. RESULTS: Baseline levels of dental therapists were low and estimated as only achieving 10-20% of the current potential job competency. The optimal exploratory scenario in terms of costs and volume of staff was based on dental therapists working full time and providing 70% of routine care that is within their current job competency; this scenario required 483 therapists by 2013, a figure that appeared achievable. Increasing the level of job competency provided by therapists revealed potentially higher benefits in terms of reduced cost and requiring fewer dentists. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that dental therapists can play a more significant role in the provision of primary dental care, both currently and in future; they also highlight the need for health services to routinely collect data that can inform workforce analysis and planning.

What has been the United Kingdom's experience with retention of third molars?

BACKGROUND: In 2000, the first National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines related to third molar (M3) surgery, a commonly performed operation in the United Kingdom, were published. This followed research publications and professional guidelines in the 1990 s that advised against prophylactic surgery and provided specific therapeutic indications for M3 surgery. The aim of the present report was to summarize the available evidence on the effects of guidelines on M3 surgery within the United Kingdom. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from primary care dental services and hospital admissions in England and Wales during a 20-year period (Hospital Episode Statistics 1989/1990 to 2009/2010), and from private medical insurance companies were analyzed. The volume and, where possible, the nature of the M3 surgery activity over time were assessed together, as were the collateral effects of the guidelines, including patient age at surgery and the indications for surgery. RESULTS: The volume of M3 removal decreased in all sectors during the 1990 s before the introduction of the NICE guidelines. During the 20-year period, the proportion of impacted M3 surgery decreased from 80% to 50% of admitted hospital cases. Furthermore, an increase occurred in the mean age for surgical admissions from 25.5 to 31.8 years. The change in age correlated with a change in the indications for M3 surgery during that period, with a reduction in "impaction," but an increase in "caries" and "pericoronitis" as etiologic factors, in accordance with the NICE guidelines. CONCLUSION: The significant decrease in M3 surgery activity occurred before the NICE guidelines. Thus, M3 surgery has been performed at a later age, with indications for surgery increasingly in accordance with the NICE guidelines. The importance of clinical monitoring of the retained M3s is discussed.

The effect of overbooking on idle dental chair capacity in the Pretoria region of the Gauteng Oral Health Services.

An analysis of annual reports revealed that on average 20% of patient appointments with oral hygienists in the Department of Health in the Pretoria region were not utilised due to patient noncompliance (i.e. broken appointments). Many solutions have been considered to address the high rate of noncompliance and the resulting idle chair capacity. One solution selected to overcome some of the negative consequences of broken appointments was deliberate overbooking. The aim of our study was to determine the effect of overbooking on idle dental chair capacity by measuring the utilisation rate over a three month period (July to September) after 25% overbooking was introduced in the Pretoria region. A statistical analysis was conducted on our results to determine an overbooking rate that would ensure full utilisation of the available dental chair capacity. The available time units over the three month study period amounted to 1365, allocated to 1427 patients resulting in an overal overbooking rate of 4.54%. The overall utilisation rate was found to be 79.2%. The calculated regression line estimated that there would be full utilisation of dental chair capacity at an overbooking rate of 26.7%. Overbooking at the levels applied in this study had a minimal overall effect on idle dental chair capacity. Our results confirm the need for careful planning and management in addressing noncompliance. In a manner similar to the clinical situation, organisational development requires a correct diagnosis in order that an appropriate and effective intervention may be designed.

An investigation into the bitewing radiographic prescribing patterns of West Kent general dental practitioners.

AIMS: The primary aims of the study were to investigate the use of bitewing radiography within primary dental care and adherence to guidelines on bitewing radiography by general dental practitioners (GDPs) in the West Kent Primary Care Trust (PCT) area. Within the overall aims, the study had objectives to investigate the use of radiographic guidelines, audit and caries risk assessment, the influence of private and National Health Service (NHS) practice, and the influence of the demographic profile of the GDPs on these variables. METHODS: Data were gathered via a piloted self-completion questionnaire, circulated to all GDPs listed on the NHS Choices website as practising in the West Kent PCT area. Three mailings and follow-up telephone calls were used. The resulting data were entered into a statistical software database and, where relevant, statistically tested, using the chi-square test. RESULTS: Of 223 GDPs, 167 responded (75%). GDPs with a high NHS commitment were significantly less likely to follow Faculty of General Dental Practice (UK) guidance on prescribing bitewing radiographs for adults (P<0.01) and children (P<0.05) than were mainly private GDPs. Mainly NHS GDPs were more likely 'always/mostly' to follow National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence guidance (83 compared to 59) (P<0.05) and also to risk-assess patients (83 compared to 62). Only 115 (71%) had carried out a radio graphic audit or peer review in the preceding three years. Those with postgraduate qualifications were more likely (P<0.05) to carry out radiographic audit. CONCLUSIONS: The study confirmed previous research reporting the under-use of radiography for caries detection and also the failure of some GDPs to comply with ionising radiation regulations. West Kent GDPs with a high NHS commitment were less likely to follow radiographic guidance than their private counterparts. This suggests that further efforts to disseminate information on radiographic guidelines and to educate GDPs are necessary to improve adherence with all aspects of radiography within general dental practice. Research into factors that influence GDPs' decision-making with regards to radiographic prescription may further inform the profession as to the best methods to lead to behavioural change. The dental profession and its regulators need to make a concerted effort to educate and inform GDPs so that this behaviour is modified.

Adult orthodontics--who's doing what?

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the number of adults currently being treated by specialist orthodontists in the UK, both within the National Health Service (NHS) and privately, together with the factors relating to adults undergoing orthodontic treatment, their malocclusions and details of treatment undertaken. DESIGN: Self-administered postal questionnaire. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: All individuals entered on the General Dental Council's Specialist List in Orthodontics, registered within the UK. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to all those on the General Dental Council's Specialist List in Orthodontics to ascertain the numbers of adult patients being treated by specialist orthodontists and factors relating to their treatment. This included age and gender of adults being treated, sources of referral, type of orthodontic treatment carried out, disciplines involved in multidisciplinary treatment, appliance types used and issues which practitioners felt affected adult treatment. Adults undergoing orthognathic treatment were excluded from this study. RESULTS: The questionnaire yielded a response rate of 70%. Those respondents working in combined hospital/university posts treated the largest proportion of adults within the NHS and those working in specialist orthodontic practice treated the largest number privately. Within 1 year, the estimated mean number of adult cases started by specialist orthodontists within the NHS was 20.9 and privately was 28.2. The majority of adults treated were reported to be within the 26-35 year age group. Most adult patients were referred for orthodontic treatment by their general dental practitioners and over 70% of treatment provided was orthodontic-only. Adults' concerns regarding the appearance of orthodontic appliances was quoted by orthodontists as being the most commonly occurring potentially complicating factor with regards to both NHS and private treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Although there are reports in the literature that the number of adult orthodontic patients is increasing, there are no comprehensive figures regarding the number of adults previously treated within the NHS and privately in the UK to compare our data with. This paper presents initial data relating to practitioners' estimates of the numbers of adults being treated in the UK.

The use of fixed appliances in the UK: a survey of specialist orthodontists.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the use of fixed appliances in the UK. DESIGN: Prospective postal questionnaire. SETTING: UK. PARTICIPANTS: All members of the General Dental Council Specialist List in Orthodontics still in active practice and not in training posts. METHOD: A preemptive letter of explanation was sent inviting orthodontists to participate in the survey. The questionnaire was subsequently posted to 935 specialists. Data analysis investigated differences in clinical practice related to varying provider groups, level of operator experience and geographical region. RESULTS: The response rate achieved was 66.3%. A majority of orthodontists routinely used the 0.022 inch pre-adjusted edgewise system, standard size Siamese pattern stainless steel brackets, conventionally ligated and bonded using standard etch and light cured composite. Nickel titanium and stainless steel were the most popular archwire materials. Anchorage was supported routinely by palatal and lingual arches in up to 25% and by headgear in over a third of respondents. Newer innovations showed variable popularity. Self-etching primer was used routinely by one-third of respondents with 11% use of self-ligating brackets. Banding of first molars was preferred by over 60% of clinicians. Bone screw implants were used by only 0.2% of respondents. Clinicians with less than 10 years experience used more headgear, light curing, MBT prescription and molar bonding. Operators with over 20 years experience used more chemically cured bonding, Roth prescription, banded first molars, 0.018 inch slot size and Tip-Edge(TM), with less use of headgear. Fixed appliance use differed from that reported in the US with lower use in the UK of standard edgewise and Roth systems, aesthetic, miniaturised and 0.018 inch slot brackets and rapid maxillary expansion. CONCLUSION: Most UK orthodontic specialists routinely used the 0.022 inch pre-adjusted edgewise system with standard size Siamese steel brackets bonded using standard etch and light cured composite with conventional ligation. Variations were seen between different provider groups, types of treatment funding, levels of operator seniority and geographical regions. Differences were noted particularly in the use of bracket prescription and design, types of molar attachment and anchorage control.

Do smoking cessation activities as part of oral health promotion vary between dental care providers relative to the NHS/private treatment mix offered? A study in West Yorkshire.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether or not and to what extent health promotion and smoking cessation activities varied between dental practices relative to their National Health Service (NHS)/private treatment mix. METHODS: A piloted questionnaire was posted to all dental practitioners within West Yorkshire, with two follow-up mailings. RESULTS: The response rate was 50% (386/769) of dental practitioners within West Yorkshire. Respondents were dichotomised at the median according to the proportion of NHS/private patients seen (>89% NHS, described as 'NHS-orientated practices' [NHSOPs] and <90% NHS, referred to as 'more privately-orientated practices' [POPs]). Practice profiles: Compared with POPs, NHSOPs' respondents had a significantly higher proportion of adult patients exempt from NHS charges (34% vs 57%), together with a higher proportion of children. Health promotion activities: there was no significant difference between the two groups of practitioners regarding the proportion claiming to give smoking cessation advice (42% vs 37%), although a higher proportion of those from POPs offered guidance on diet and nutrition (67% vs 54%; P<0.05). However, a significantly higher proportion of POP respondents reported (a) recording smoking status in the clinical notes, (b) giving out smoking-related leaflets, and (c) referring to an NHS 'Stop Smoking Service'. NHSOP respondents were more likely to cite 'lack of time', 'no incentive' and 'lack of expertise' as potential barriers to providing health promotion advice. General: 7% of POP respondents thought that the new NHS contract arrangements would influence their smoking cessation activities versus 19% of NHSOP residents. CONCLUSIONS: Considerable variation between NHSOPs and POPs was found when comparing aspects of their health promotion/smoking cessation activities. The findings identified here suggest that the current situation, with regard to the NHS, will tend to increase health inequalities.

Heavy use of dental services among Finnish children and adolescents.

AIM: Our aim was to identify the heavy use of dental services among children and adolescents in the Public Dental Service (PDS) of one of the biggest cities in Finland, and compare oral health and treatments provided for heavy and low users. METHODS: All patients under 18 years of age having had 6 or more dental visits (n. 2,285) in 2004 and a comparison group of those having had 3 or fewer visits (n. 27,957) were selected from the patient register of the PDS of the city of Espoo. A sample of 245 patients was randomly selected from each group and information on age, sex, dental status, number and types of visits and treatments provided was collected from their treatment records. RESULTS: Seven percent of the children and adolescents who had visited the PDS in 2004 were heavy users according to the definition used. Their visits accounted for 26.3% of all dental visits of children and adolescents. The heavy users were classified as basic care heavy users and orthodontic heavy users. The mean treatment time for the basic care heavy users was 3 hours and 50 minutes, and for orthodontic heavy users 3 hours and 23 minutes; it was 40 minutes for the low users. Heavy users were on average 1.8 years older than low users. The basic care heavy users had more treated and untreated caries (mean DMFT/dmft = 4.0 and D/d = 2.4) than the low users (DMFT/dmft = 0.95 and D/d = 0.4). Of the low users, 43.6% had a healthy periodontium (CPI = 0) compared with 27.4% of the basic care heavy users and with 30.8% of the orthodontic heavy users. The most frequently provided treatments for heavy users were orthodontic care and fillings by dentists and for low users preventive measures and examinations. Most of the heavy users (66.4%) received less complicated orthodontic treatment given by a dentist compared with only 7.9% of the low users. Despite the low users' significantly better oral status compared with basic care heavy users there were only minor differences in the type of preventive measures provided for the two groups. The orthodontic heavy users received fewer preventive measures than low users. CONCLUSION: Our study revealed two main reasons for heavy use of dental services: high numbers of orthodontic treatments provided by dentists and high numbers of decayed teeth in a small number of children. To increase productivity, orthodontic care should be provided more efficiently and preventive care needs to be targeted more carefully.

The effects of social class and dental attendance on oral health.

The relationship between socio-economic status (SES) and oral health is well-established. We investigated whether the association between SES and the number of sound teeth in adults is explained by dental attendance patterns, in turn determined by the effect of SES on barriers to dental attendance. Data on 3817 participants from the 1998 Adult Dental Health Survey in the UK were analyzed. Using structural equation modeling, we found a model with 4 factors (aging, SES, attendance-profile, and barriers-to-dental-attendance) providing an adequate fit to the covariance matrix of the 9 covariates. The final model suggests that the association between SES and the number of sound teeth in adults in the UK is partially explained by the pathway [SES --> barriers-to-dental-attendance --> dental-attendance-profile --> number-of-sound-teeth]. A direct relationship, SES --> number-of-sound-teeth, is also significant.

Factors influencing the career aspirations and preferred modes of working in recent dental graduates in Wales.

INTRODUCTION: In England and Wales, National Health Service (NHS) primary dental care services are now commissioned on a local basis. In planning for the future, it is important that commissioning authorities have a clear understanding of the perspectives of recent dental graduates: vocational dental practitioners (VDPs). OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the career aspirations and preferred modes of working of VDPs in Wales. METHODOLOGY: Data were collected via a postal questionnaire, comprising 37 closed and open questions, mailed to all 59 VDPs in Wales. RESULTS: A total of 53 (90%) VDPs participated, of whom 47 saw their future in general dental practice: 5, 35, and 7 indicating a preference to work in the NHS, mixed (NHS and private), and private sector, respectively. None selected the Community Dental Service as their preferred vocation. More than half of all respondents intended to undertake a postgraduate qualification within the next five years and 22 wished to specialise. Of the 53 VDPs, 44 were concerned that lack of NHS contracts would limit where they could practise, and agreed that family and other social commitments were a significant influence on choice of practice location. Access to high-quality premises and continuing professional development were agreed as important by 41 VDPs. A majority (37) agreed that private dentistry was an attractive alternative to NHS dentistry. Of the respondents, 38 (22 females, 16 males) expected to work part-time at some point in the future and 14 said they would consider a career outside dentistry. Only nine VDPs agreed that they would be happy working in a single-handed practice and even fewer (six) indicated they would be happy working for a corporate body. CONCLUSIONS: Numerous factors impact on the career aspirations of VDPs. These factors have been quantified in this study, and healthcare-commissioning bodies need to be aware of them when planning future dental care provision in Wales.

A survey on orthodontic-restorative dental services in a NHS hospital.

The provision of a joint orthodontic-restorative hospital service is important in providing a quality service for some dental malocclusions. A prospective survey was carried out of the joint orthodontic-restorative clinic at Mayday University Hospital, during the months of January to August 2005. Data was collected using a data collection form. In total 61 patient's attended 4 joint clinics. Fifty per cent of referrals were by general dental practitioners. The commonest referral reasons were spacing and dental trauma. Over one third of patients were seen within 12 weeks of their referral, whilst two thirds start their treatment within 12 weeks of consultation. The commonest restorative treatment was periodontal therapy, crown and bridgework. Over one third of patients required joint orthodontic and restorative treatment. More than 12% of patients require oral surgery in the form of removal of impacted teeth, exposure of unerupted teeth, placement of bone anchors or orthognathic surgery. Consultation and treatment waiting times could be reduced by the introduction of more clinics and employment of more staff A representative in oral surgery maybe useful with the increase use of bone anchors and mini implants to aid joint orthodontic-restorative treatment. Access to an orthodontic and restorative consultant clinic is useful in providing patients with a high quality of multidisciplinary treatment planning in an efficient manner.

Dentists in the DTSS between July 2007 and July 2008.

UNLABELLED: Recent attention in the media concerning the Dental Treatment Services Scheme (DTSS) centres on the number of contracting dentists as a surrogate measure of the availability of services to adult medical card holders in the Republic of Ireland. AIM: To determine the trend in the number of contracting dentists on the DTSS panel during the year 07/'07 to 07/'08. METHODS AND DATA: Data were extracted from the database of monthly claims for remuneration, submitted by providers, which is held by the HSE. RESULTS: The average number of contractors was 1,258. The trend over the year was a reduction of 1.6% in contractor numbers. The average number of 'active' contractors was 833. The trend over the year was a reduction in 'active' contractor numbers of 6.2%. In any month, approximately 34% of contracting dentists were not active. CONCLUSIONS: The trend in the number of contracting dentists was a poor indicator of the trend in availability of services to medical card holders. A better approach would be to count the number of 'active' contractors, in conjunction with their geographic spread and medical card holder density.

NHS dentistry in the United Kingdom: past, present and future. A personal view.

The National Health Service (NHS) was created in 1948 to provide both medical and dental healthcare for the UK resident population based on need, not the ability to pay. Between 1948 and 2006 NHS dentistry improvement in oral health of the has made a huge contribution to the population of the UK.

Patterns of care and service use amongst children in the UK 2003.

BACKGROUND: The 2003 Children's Dental Health Survey is the fourth of the 10-yearly surveys of children's oral health in the United Kingdom. AIM: To detail the reported experience of dental services and dental treatment amongst children in the UK. METHOD: A self-completion questionnaire was distributed to a 50% sub-sample of parents or carers of the children who were clinically examined in the 2003 UK Child Dental Health Survey. This included questions relating to parental and child experience of dental services and dental treatment. RESULTS: The proportion of UK five-year-olds reported as not having visited the dentist fell from 14% in 1983 to 6% in 2003 and the proportion reported as having visited the dentist before the age of two rose from 7% in 1983 to 31% in 2003. Over 80% of all children were reported to seek regular dental check-ups. Around 10% were reported to have had some difficulty in accessing NHS dental care while 5% of five-year-olds were reported to have experienced a general anaesthetic for dental procedures in 2003. Dental attendance was associated with social class and mothers' reported attendance patterns. CONCLUSIONS: In line with previously reported trends, the 2003 survey of children in the United Kingdom shows improvements in several areas but some aspects of attendance pattern continue to be associated with social class and mothers' attendance pattern. It is of concern that 10% of five-year-olds reported having experienced extractions and 5% general anaesthesia for dental treatment.