Dual antiplatelet therapy versus intravenous tissue plasminogen activator with acute minor ischemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis of safety and efficacy.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the safety and efficacy of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (DAPT) and Intravenous (IV) Tissue Plasminogen Activator (t-PA) in minor Acute Ischemic Stroke (AIS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Following Cochrane and PRISMA guidelines, we analyzed observational studies and clinical trials comparing DAPT and IV t-PA in patients with minor AIS. Databases included PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Data extraction included study characteristics, patient demographics, and analyzed outcomes. RevMan 5.3 and OpenMetaAnalyst 2021 were used to analyze the data and assess heterogeneity, respectively. The risk of bias was determined using RoB 2.0 and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. RESULTS: This meta-analysis included five studies with 3,978 DAPT-treated patients and 2,224 IV t-PA-treated patients. We found no significant differences in achieving modified Rankin scale (mRS) scores of 0-1 (OR 1.11, 95 % CI: 0.79, 1.55, p = 0.56) and 0-2 (OR 0.90, 95 % CI: 0.61, 1.31, p = 0.57), as well as combined mRS scores (OR 1.05, 95 % CI: 0.82, 1.34, p = 0.72). Similarly, there were no significant disparities between the two treatment groups in NIHSS score change from baseline (MD 0.32, 95 % CI: -0.35, 0.98, p = 0.35) and in mortality rates (OR 0.87, 95 % CI: 0.26, 2.93, p = 0.83). Notably, in comparison to the IV t-PA group, the DAPT group exhibited a significantly lower incidence of bleeding (OR 0.31, 95 % CI: 0.14, 0.69, p = 0.004) and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) (OR 0.10, 95 % CI: 0.04, 0.26, p < 0.00001). CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis found no significant differences in efficacy between DAPT and IV t-PA. However, DAPT demonstrated a significantly lower risk of sICH and bleeding compared with IV t-PA.

Intravenous Thrombolysis Is Associated with Less Disabling Stroke and Lower Mortality in Multiple-Pass Endovascular Thrombectomy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The benefit of bridging intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in acute ischaemic stroke patients eligible for endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is unclear. This may be particularly relevant where reperfusion is achieved with multiple thrombectomy passes. We aimed to determine the benefit of bridging IVT in first and multiple-pass patients undergoing EVT ≤6 h from stroke onset to groin puncture. METHODS: We compared 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) outcomes in 187 consecutive patients with large vessel occlusions (LVOs) of the anterior cerebral circulation who underwent EVT ≤6 h from symptom onset and who achieved modified thrombolysis in cerebral ischaemia (mTICI) 2c/3 reperfusion with the first pass to those patients who required multiple passes to achieve reperfusion. The effect of bridging IVT on outcomes was examined. RESULTS: Significantly more first-pass patients had favourable (mRS 0-2) 90-day outcomes (68 vs. 42%, p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed an association between first-pass reperfusion and favourable outcomes (OR 2.25; 95% CI 1.08-4.68; p = 0.03). IVT provided no additional benefit in first-pass patients (OR 1.17; CI 0.42-3.20; p = 0.76); however, in multiple-pass patients, it reduced the risk of disabling stroke (mRS ≥4) (OR 0.30; CI 0.10-0.88; p = 0.02) and mortality (OR 0.07; CI 0.01-0.36; p = 0.002) at 90 days. CONCLUSION: Bridging IVT may benefit patients with anterior circulation stroke with LVO who qualify for EVT and who require multiple passes to achieve reperfusion.

Association of Admission Hyperglycemia with Clinical Outcomes in Japanese Patients with Acute Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke: A post hoc Analysis of the Recovery by Endovascular Salvage for Cerebral Ultra-Acute Embolism Japan Registry 2.

INTRODUCTION: Admission hyperglycemia is an indicator of poor functional prognosis in acute stroke, but investigations of its prevalence and effects on the outcomes of acute large vessel occlusion in real-world, large-scale studies are limited, especially in Asian population. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to elucidate the relationship between admission hyperglycemia and outcomes in a prospective multicenter registry in Japan. METHODS: We analyzed data from the Recovery by Endovascular Salvage for Cerebral Ultra-Acute Embolism (RESCUE) Japan Registry 2, which was a prospective, multicenter registry that enrolled patients from 46 centers in Japan. Admission hyperglycemia was defined as blood glucose level >140 mg/dL. The relationships between clinical outcomes and admission hyperglycemia were analyzed in all 1,932 assessable patients. A favorable functional outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2 at day 90, as well as mortality within 90 days and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH) within 72 h, was analyzed. We performed subgroup analyses of the adjusted variables to investigate the association between hyperglycemia and favorable outcome in relation to each variable. RESULTS: Admission hyperglycemia was present in 687 (35.6%) of the assessable patients and in 420 (26.9%) of the 1,561 patients without diabetes. A favorable outcome was significantly less frequent in the hyperglycemia group than in the no-hyperglycemia group (33.2% vs. 47.6%, adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 0.60, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.47-0.76). The mortality rates were 12.8% and 6.8% in the hyperglycemia and no-hyperglycemia groups, respectively. The incidence of SICH within 72 h was higher in the hyperglycemia group than in the no-hyperglycemia group (4.4% vs. 1.9%, adjusted OR: 2.54, 95% CI: 1.36-4.82). Hyperglycemia was associated with unfavorable outcomes in almost all subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Admission hyperglycemia in Japanese patients with large vessel occlusion stroke is associated with an unfavorable functional outcome at 90 days, mortality within 90 days, and the occurrence of SICH within 72 h.

In-Hospital Acute Ischemic Stroke is Associated with Worse Outcome: Experience of a Single Center in Santiago Chile.

OBJECTIVES: In-hospital acute ischemic stroke (HIS) accounts for 2-17% of all acute ischemic strokes (AIS) seen in hospital and they have worse prognosis. In this study we aimed to identify the frequency of HIS and their characteristics in our center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of a prospective register of patients with AIS seen at Clínica Alemana de Santiago, between January 2017 and January 2019. HIS and community onset ischemic strokes patients (CIS) were compared, univariate analysis was performed, covariates with p < 0.25 were selected for multivariate analysis. Differences between, proportion of strokes treated with thrombolytic therapy, door to needle time were compared between HIS and CIS patients, as also mortality rates at 90 days. RESULTS: During the study period 369 patients with AIS were seen; of these 20 (5.4%, 95 CI%, 3.5-8.2) corresponded to HIS. In univariate analysis, HIS compared to patients arriving form the community to the emergency room, suffered more frequently from, heart failure (p = 0.04), and active malignancies (p < 0.001). HIS patients had longer times from symptom onset to non-contrast brain tomography (540 ±150 minutes); they were also less frequently treated with intravenous thrombolysis compared to community AIS: 15% versus 30% respectively (p = 0.08). Mortality rates at 90 days were higher in HIS: 30 versus 5% (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort, HIS patients suffered delays in their neuroimaging studies and received less intravenous thrombolysis; this underscores the need for a standardized approach to the recognition and management of inhospital acute ischemic stroke.

Efficacy and Safety of the Telestroke Drip-And-Stay Model: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To compare outcomes between two models of acute ischemic stroke care. Namely 1) "drip-and-stay", i.e. IV tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) administered at a spoke hospital in a telestroke network, with the patient remaining at the spoke, versus 2) "drip-and-ship", i.e. tPA administered at a spoke hospital with subsequent patient transfer to a hub hospital, and 3) "hub", i.e. tPA and subsequent treatment at a hub hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis according to PRISMA guidelines. Literature searches of MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane from inception-October 2019 included randomized control trials and observational cohort studies comparing the drip-and-stay model to hub and drip-and-ship models. Outcomes of interest were functional independence (modified Rankin Scale ≤ 1), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), mortality, and length of stay. Pooled effect estimates were calculated using a fixed-effects meta-analysis and random-effects Bayesian meta-analysis. Non-inferiority was calculated using a fixed-margin method. RESULTS: Of 2806 unique records identified, 10 studies, totaling 4,164 patients, fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Meta-analysis found no significant difference in functional outcomes (mRS0-1) (6 studies, RR=1.09, 95%CI 0.98-1.22, p=0.123), sICH (8 studies, RR=0.98, 95%CI 0.64-1.51, p=0.942), or 90-day mortality (5 studies, RR=0.98, 95%CI 0.73-1.32, p=0.911, respectively) between patients treated in a drip-and-stay model compared to patients treated in drip-and-ship or hub models. There was no significant heterogeneity in these outcomes. Drip-and-stay outcomes (mRS 0-1, sICH) were non-inferior when compared to the combined group. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that drip-and-stay is non-inferior to current models of drip-and-ship or hub stroke care, and may be as safe and as effective as either.

Safety of Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke in Patients Taking Warfarin with Subtherapeutic INR.

INTRODUCTION: Current guidelines allow the administration of intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (IV r-tPA) to warfarin-treated patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) who have an international normalized ratio (INR) of ≤1.7. However, concerns remain about the safety of using IV r-tPA in this situation due to a conceivable risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), lack of dedicated randomized controlled trials and the conflicts in the available data. We aimed to determine the risk of sICH in warfarin-treated patients with subtherapeutic INR who received IV r-tPA for AIS in our large volume comprehensive center. METHODS: Patients who had received IV r-tPA for AIS in a 9.6-year period were retrospectively investigated (n = 834). Patients taking warfarin prior to presentation were identified (n = 55). One patient was excluded due to elevated INR beyond the acceptable range for IV r-tPA treatment. Because of the significant difference in the sample size (54 vs 779), warfarin group was matched with 54 non-warfarin patients adjusted for independent risk factors for sICH (age, admission NIHSS, history of diabetes). Good outcome was defined as mRS of 0-2 on discharge and sICH was defined as an ICH causing increase in NIHSS ≥4 or death. Warfarin-treated group was further dichotomized based on INR (1-1.3 vs 1.3-1.7) and safety and outcome measures were compared between resultant groups. RESULTS: No significant difference was found between warfarin-treated and the non-warfarin groups in terms of chance of good outcome on discharge (27.8% in warfarin group vs 26.4% in non-warfarin group; p-value >0.05), or the rate of occurrence of sICH (3.7% in warfarin group vs 11.1% in non-warfarin group; p-value >0.05). Furthermore, rate of sICH (5.1% in patients with INR <1.3 versus 0.0% in patients with INR 1.3-1.7; p-value >0.05) or chance of good outcome on discharge (28.2% of patients with INR <1.3 versus 26.7% in patients with INR 1.3-1.7; p-value >0.05) were not found to be different after the warfarin-treated group was dichotomized. CONCLUSION: Administration of IV r-tPA for AIS in warfarin-treated patients with subtherapeutic INR <1.7 does not increase the risk of sICH.

Outcomes of Homeless Ischemic Stroke Patients Receiving Intravenous Thrombolysis in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Morbidity and mortality among homeless people with cardiovascular diseases and stroke in the United States is high. Adverse outcomes within the homeless population may be the result of seeking care too late to receive time-sensitive interventions. We sought to investigate the impact of homelessness on ischemic stroke patients who received intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). METHODS: We determined rates of post-thrombolytic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), in-hospital death, and development of moderate to severe disability among homeless ischemic stroke patients treated with IVT. Patients were identified using the Nationwide (National) Inpatient Sample between 2002 and 2017. We compared rates of the various outcomes to non-homeless ischemic stroke patients treated with IVT. RESULTS: There were 514 homeless (mean age 54.7 ± 10.2 years, 20.4% women) and 364,408 non-homeless (mean age 68.6 ± 14.7 years, 49.7% women) ischemic stroke patients who received IVT. There was no difference in post-thrombolytic ICH rates between the two groups (6.6% homeless versus 8.8% non-homeless, p = 0.09). Homeless patients were more frequently discharged to self-care (p = 0.003). Homeless patients were less likely than non-homeless patients to suffer in-hospital death (AOR 0.499 [95% CI 0.30-0.84], p = 0.009) and moderate to severe disability (AOR 0.423 [95% CI 0.29 - 0.62], p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Homeless ischemic stroke patients who receive IVT are not at an increased risk of developing post-thrombolytic ICH or in-hospital death. Efforts are needed to encourage this unique population to seek medical attention as soon as possible for time-sensitive interventions that may decrease the risk of permanent disability or death associated with ischemic stroke.

Ischemic Stroke in the Very Elderly: Experience from an Italian Stroke Unit Hub Over a Period of 8 Years in the Era of Thrombectomy.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study is to understand how very elderly patients (VEP) after ischemic stroke are currently treated in a Stroke Unit (SU) Hub in Italy. We designed a retrospective monocentric study on patients admitted in the SU of "AO San Camillo Forlanini" over an 8-year period. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data were collected among patients with acute ischemic stroke admitted to SU between January 2012 and December 2019. Patients were divided into three sub-groups: Adults (18-65 years); Elderly (66-85 years); and VEP (>85 years). Vascular risk factors and clinical variables as predictors of short-term clinical outcome were compared among age groups. RESULTS: A total of 1979 patients were enrolled, 254 were VEP (12.8%). The proportion of VEP showed no significant modifications during the 8-year period (11.9% in 2012-2015 and 13.7% in 2016-2019; p=0.93). The proportion of women, hypertension and atrial fibrillation was significantly higher in VEP compared to other age groups (p<0.001). The rate of VEP being treated with rt-PA increased from 2012-2015 to 2016-2019 (from 12.8% to 25.5%, p<0.001). Endovascular thrombectomy was rarely performed in VEP (1.5% of VEP). Rt-PA treatment was associated with favorable outcome for all three age groups (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We showed that VEP present different vascular risk factor profiles, clinical features, and prognostic elements for short-term stroke outcome. Future studies will reveal whether we will observe an increasing trend in the use of rt-PA and endovascular thrombectomy and whether it will result in improved functional outcome for VEP.

Reperfusion Therapy in Acute Ischemic Stroke with Active Cancer: A Meta-Analysis Aided by Machine Learning.

OBJECTIVES: While the prevalence of active cancer patients experiencing acute stroke is increasing, the effects of active cancer on reperfusion therapy outcomes are inconclusive. Thus, we aimed to compare the safety and outcomes of reperfusion therapy in acute stroke patients with and without active cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted for studies comparing the effects of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) or endovascular treatment (EVT) in ischemic stroke patients with and without active cancer. The literature was screened using both a manual and machine learning algorithm approach. The outcomes evaluated were symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), all-type intracerebral hemorrhage (aICH), successful recanalization, favorable outcomes (modified Rankin Scale, 0-2), and mortality. We calculated the pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) using the random-effects model from the included studies. RESULTS: Seven studies were analyzed in this meta-analysis. IVT (n = 1012) was associated with an increased risk of sICH (OR, 9.80; 95% CI, 3.19-30.13) in the active cancer group. However, no significant differences in aICH, favorable outcomes, and mortality were found between groups. Although sICH and successful recanalization in the EVT group (n = 2496) were similar, we observed fewer favorable outcomes (OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.33-0.93) and a high prevalence of mortality (OR, 2.91; 95% CI, 1.89-4.47) in the active cancer group. CONCLUSIONS: Reperfusion therapy may benefit selected patients with acute ischemic stroke with active cancer, considering the comparable clinical outcomes of IVT and procedure-related outcomes of EVT. These results should be cautiously interpreted and confirmed in future well-designed large-scale studies.

Intravenous Thrombolysis before Thrombectomy may Increase the Incidence of Intracranial Hemorrhage inTreating Carotid T Occlusion.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Current evidence does not agree on the merits of direct and bridging thrombectomy. This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of direct thrombectomy (DT) and bridging thrombectomy (BT) in treating patients with acute ischaemic stroke due to carotid T occlusion. METHODS: Patients with stroke due to carotid T occlusion who were treated with DT or BT were retrospectively collected from four advanced stroke centres. Baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared between the groups. Successful recanalization was defined by a modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (mTICI) score of 2b or 3. A favourable outcome was defined by a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-2 at 90 days after stroke onset. Multivariable analysis was performed to control for potential confounders. RESULTS: Of the 111 enrolled patients, 57 (51.4%) patients were treated with DT, and 54 (48.6%) were treated with BT. Patients treated with DT had a shorter imaging to puncture (ITP) time (53 min versus 92 min, P<0.001) and symptom onset to puncture (OTP) time (198 min versus 218 min, P=0.045) than patients treated with BT. No significant difference was detected concerning the rate of successful recanalization (80.7% versus 77.8%, P=0.704) or a favourable outcome between patients treated with DT and BT (35.1% versus 33.3%, P=0.846). Patients treated with DT had a lower intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) rate (40.4% versus 59.3%, P=0.046), but the difference was not significant for symptomatic ICH (sICH, 12.3% versus 16.7%, P=0.511) or asymptomatic ICH (aICH, 28.1% versus 42.6%, P=0.109). After adjusting for potential confounding factors, the ratio of favorable prognosis, successful reperfusion, sICH and mortality did not differ between the two groups. However, there was a higher rate of ICH (OR=2.492, 95% CI 1.005 to 6.180, p=0.049) in the BT group as compared with the DT group. CONCLUSIONS: DT seems equivalent to BT in treating stroke due to carotid T occlusion in favorable outcome, successful recanalization, 90-day morality and sICH. However, BT may increase the incidence of ICH in this specific type stroke.

Prognostic Significance of Stroke-Associated Infection and other Readily Available Parameters in Acute Ischemic Stroke Treated by Intravenous Thrombolysis.

OBJECTIVES: The impact of contracting stroke-associate infection (SAI) that requires antibiotic treatment after an acute ischemic stroke (AIS) treated with alteplase remains unclear. We studied the profiles of SAI in patients with AIS treated with alteplase toward identifying predictive factors and prognostic implications at 90 days post-stroke. METHODS: We analyzed 33 parameters readily available within 24 hours after AIS: demographics, risk factors, and several clinical and biochemical parameters. Outcome measures were mRS ≤ 2 and mortality 90 days post-stroke. RESULTS: 83 (23.6%) of 352 patients developed SAI. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that atrial fibrillation, mRS above 0 pre-stroke, lower delta NIHSS (the difference between NIHSS score measured upon admission and 24 hours after later), CRP≥10 mg/L, and elevated WBC count affected SAI risk (model including CRP levels and WBC count) and atrial fibrillation, mRS above 0 pre-stroke, lower delta NIHSS, HT, and elevated fibrinogen levels affected SAI risk (model excluding CRP levels and WBC count). 231 patients (74.1%) had mRS ≤ 2 at day 90. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that younger age, no hypertension, mRS=0 pre-stroke, higher delta NIHSS, no HT, no SAI, and CRP<10 mg/L, were associated with mRS≤2 at day 90. 54 (15.3%) patients died within 90 days. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that pre-stroke mRS>0, lower delta NIHSS, HT, CRP≥10 mg/L, lower triglyceride levels affected the risk of death within 90 days. CONCLUSIONS: Several markers available within 24 hours post-stroke were predictive of SAI that requires antibiotic treatment. SAI affects long-term outcome but not mortality.

Safety and Outcomes of Intravenous Thrombolytic Therapy in Ischemic Stroke Patients with COVID-19: CASCADE Initiative.

BACKGROUND: There is little information regarding the safety of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV-tPA) in patients with stroke and COVID-19. METHODS: This multicenter study included consecutive stroke patients with and without COVID-19 treated with IV-tPA between February 18, 2019, to December 31, 2020, at 9 centers participating in the CASCADE initiative. Clinical outcomes included modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at hospital discharge, in-hospital mortality, the rate of hemorrhagic transformation. Using Bayesian multiple regression and after adjusting for variables with significant value in univariable analysis, we reported the posterior adjusted odds ratio (OR, with 95% Credible Intervals [CrI]) of the main outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 545 stroke patients, including 101 patients with COVID-19 were evaluated. Patients with COVID-19 had a more severe stroke at admission. In the study cohort, 85 (15.9%) patients had a hemorrhagic transformation, and 72 (13.1%) died in the hospital. After adjustment for confounding variables, discharge mRS score ≥2 (OR: 0.73, 95% CrI: 0.16, 3.05), in-hospital mortality (OR: 2.06, 95% CrI: 0.76, 5.53), and hemorrhagic transformation (OR: 1.514, 95% CrI: 0.66, 3.31) were similar in COVID-19 and non COVID-19 patients. High-sensitivity C reactive protein level was a predictor of hemorrhagic transformation in all cases (OR:1.01, 95%CI: 1.0026, 1.018), including those with COVID-19 (OR:1.024, 95%CI:1.002, 1.054). CONCLUSION: IV-tPA treatment in patients with acute ischemic stroke and COVID-19 was not associated with an increased risk of disability, mortality, and hemorrhagic transformation compared to those without COVID-19. IV-tPA should continue to be considered as the standard of care in patients with hyper acute stroke and COVID-19.

Treatment Approaches and Outcomes for Acute Anterior Circulation Stroke Patients with Tandem Lesions.

OBJECTIVES: Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) has revolutionized stroke care for large vessel occlusions (LVOs). However, over half treated remain functionally disabled or die. Patients with tandem lesions, or severe stenosis/occlusion of the cervical internal carotid artery (ICA) with intracranial LVO, may have technical EVT challenges and worse outcomes. We sought to compare treatments and outcomes for patients with anterior circulation tandem lesions versus isolated LVOs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive tandem lesion and isolated intracranial LVO patients were identified at a single center. Demographics, medical history, presentations, treatments, and outcomes were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: From 381 EVT patients, 62 had tandem lesions related to atherosclerosis (74%) or dissection (26%). Compared to isolated intracranial LVOs, they were younger (63 vs 70, p = 0.003), had less atrial fibrillation (13% vs 40%, p < 0.0001), less adequate reperfusion (TICI 2b-3, 58% vs 82%, p < 0.0001), more intracranial hemorrhage (ICH, 13% vs 5%, p = 0.037), but similar 90-day functional independence (mRS 0-2, 34% vs 43%, p = 0.181). The cervical ICA was treated before intracranial EVT (57%), after (13%), not acutely (22%), or was inaccessible (8%). Acute cervical ICA treatments were stenting (57%) or angioplasty alone (13%). Neither acute stenting nor order of treatment was associated with outcomes (TICI 2b-3, ICH, or 90-day mRS 0-2). Among acutely stented, neither alteplase nor antiplatelets were associated with outcomes or stent patency. CONCLUSIONS: Tandem lesions were associated with less reperfusion, more ICH, but similar 90-day functional independence. No treatment approach was associated with outcomes. These data illustrate the technical challenges of tandem lesion treatment and underscore the importance of developing new approaches.

Endovascular Therapy of Acute Ischemic Stroke in Patients with Large-Vessel Occlusion Associated with Active Malignancy.

PURPOSE: There is limited data on the effectiveness of endovascular therapy (EVT) in stroke patients with active malignancy. In this study, we investigated the outcome of EVT for acute ischemic stroke for patients with active malignancy compared to those without malignancy. METHODS: We selected patients who underwent EVT for acute ischemic stroke between January 2015 and July 2019. Patients were divided into two groups, those with active malignancy (oncology group - OG) and those without (non-oncology group, NOG). RESULTS: 300 patients were included in this study. There were 19 EVT procedures (18 patients) in the OG and 285 procedures (282 patients) in the NOG. There was no difference in recanalization success rate (mTICI 2b & 3) between the groups: 94.7% versus 80.9% in OG and NOG respectively (p = 0.13). Success rate using the direct aspiration (ADAPT) technique of EVT was not different between compared groups (42.9% versus 67.7%; p = 0.18). However, when using smaller-caliber aspiration devices, ADAPT was less successful in OG (0.0% versus 64.7%, p < 0.05). There was no difference in recanalization success rate of EVT when using a stent-retriever or combined technique. Patients in the OG had a less favorable functional outcome than in the NOG group (mRS 0-2 at 90-days post event: 22.2% versus 48.2%, p < 0.05) CONCLUSION: The technical success rate of EVT in patients with active malignancy is similar to the general population of stroke patients. Interestingly, the success rate of EVT using the ADAPT technique was lower in the OG when using smaller caliber aspiration devices.

Interventional Therapies for Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Current Status and Principles for the Development of Novel Evidence: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Pulmonary embolism (PE) represents the third leading cause of cardiovascular mortality. The technological landscape for management of acute intermediate- and high-risk PE is rapidly evolving. Two interventional devices using pharmacomechanical means to recanalize the pulmonary arteries have recently been cleared by the US Food and Drug Administration for marketing, and several others are in various stages of development. The purpose of this document is to clarify the current state of endovascular interventional therapy for acute PE and to provide considerations for evidence development for new devices that will define which patients with PE would derive the greatest net benefit from their use in various clinical settings. First, definitions and limitations of commonly used risk stratification tools for PE are reviewed. An adjudication of risks and benefits of available interventional therapies for PE follows. Next, considerations for optimal future evidence development in this field are presented in the context of the current US regulatory framework. Finally, the document concludes with a discussion of the pros and cons of the rapidly expanding PE response team model of care delivery.

Intravenous thrombolysis for suspected ischemic stroke with seizure at onset.

OBJECTIVE: Seizure at onset (SaO) has been considered a relative contraindication for intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in patients with acute ischemic stroke, although this appraisal is not evidence based. Here, we investigated the prognostic significance of SaO in patients treated with IVT for suspected ischemic stroke. METHODS: In this multicenter, IVT-registry-based study we assessed the association between SaO and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH, European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study II definition), 3-month mortality, and 3-month functional outcome on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) using unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression, coarsened exact matching, and inverse probability weighted analyses. RESULTS: Among 10,074 IVT-treated patients, 146 (1.5%) had SaO. SaO patients had significantly higher National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score and glucose on admission, and more often female sex, prior stroke, and prior functional dependence than non-SaO patients. In unadjusted analysis, they had generally less favorable outcomes. After controlling for confounders in adjusted, matched, and weighted analyses, all associations between SaO and any of the outcomes disappeared, including sICH (odds ratio [OR]unadjusted = 1.53 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.74-3.14], ORadjusted = 0.52 [95% CI = 0.13-2.16], ORmatched = 0.68 [95% CI = 0.15-3.03], ORweighted = 0.95 [95% CI = 0.39-2.32]), mortality (ORunadjusted = 1.49 [95% CI = 1.00-2.24], ORadjusted = 0.98 [95% CI = 0.5-1.92], ORmatched = 1.13 [95% CI = 0.55-2.33], ORweighted = 1.17 [95% CI = 0.73-1.88]), and functional outcome (mRS ≥ 3/ordinal mRS: ORunadjusted = 1.33 [95% CI = 0.96-1.84]/1.35 [95% CI = 1.01-1.81], ORadjusted = 0.78 [95% CI = 0.45-1.32]/0.78 [95% CI = 0.52-1.16], ORmatched = 0.75 [95% CI = 0.43-1.32]/0.45 [95% CI = 0.10-2.06], ORweighted = 0.87 [95% CI = 0.57-1.34]/1.00 [95% CI = 0.66-1.52]). These results were consistent regardless of whether patients had an eventual diagnosis of ischemic stroke (89/146) or stroke mimic (57/146 SaO patients). INTERPRETATION: SaO was not an independent predictor of poor prognosis. Withholding IVT from patients with assumed ischemic stroke presenting with SaO seems unjustified. ANN NEUROL 2019;86:770-779.

Efficacy of intra-arterial catheter-directed thrombolysis for popliteal and infrapopliteal acute limb ischemia.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy and safety of catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) for first-line treatment of popliteal and infrapopliteal acute limb ischemia. METHODS: A total of 28 consecutive patients (30 limbs) who underwent CDT for treatment of popliteal and infrapopliteal acute limb ischemia of thromboembolic origin between March 2012 and December 2017 were enrolled in this study. Per the Society for Vascular Surgery, limbs were classified into three runoff score groups: <5, good; 5 to 10, compromised; and >10, poor. The primary end points were primary patency and limb salvage assessed by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Secondary end points were technical success and clinical success. The Society for Vascular Surgery-recommended scale for gauging changes in clinical status was used to assess clinical success. Safety of the procedure was evaluated on the basis of periprocedural complications according to the Society of Interventional Radiology classification system. RESULTS: Technical success was achieved in 25 (83.33%) treated limbs. Improved clinical status (grade +3/+2) was achieved in 93.33% of limbs. Primary patency and limb salvage for the entire cohort were 76.67% and 90% at 6 months and 60.0% and 76.67% at 12 months, respectively. The patency rate at 6 months and 12 months was 91.67% and 83.33% for the good runoff group, 80% and 60% for the compromised runoff group, and 50% and 25% for the poor runoff group, respectively. The patency rate of the good runoff group was significantly higher compared with that of the poor runoff group (P = .004). Major amputation rate and mortality rate were 16.67% and 7.14%, respectively, at 12 months. The reintervention rate was 3.57% at 6 months and 21.42% at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: CDT is safe and effective for revascularization of smaller vessel acute arterial thromboembolism as a primary therapy. However, more studies with a larger sample are warranted.

Bridging versus Direct Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Subgroup Pooled Meta-Analysis for Time of Intervention, Eligibility, and Study Design.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The risk/benefit profile of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) prior to endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in acute ischemic stroke is still unclear. We provide a systematic review and meta-analysis including studies comparing direct EVT (dEVT) vs. bridging treatment (IVT + EVT), defining the impact of treatment timing and eligibility to IVT on functional status and mortality. METHODS: Protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019135915) and followed PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), retrospective, and prospective studies comparing IVT + EVT vs. dEVT in adults (≥18) with acute ischemic stroke. Primary endpoint was functional independence at 90 days (modified Rankin Scale <3); secondary endpoints were (i) good recanalization (thrombolysis in cerebral infarction >2a), (ii) mortality, and (iii) symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). Subgroup analysis was performed according to study type, eligibility to IVT, and onset-to-groin timing (OGT), stratifying studies for similar OGT. ORs for endpoints were pooled with meta-analysis and compared between reperfusion strategies. RESULTS: Overall, 35 studies were included (n = 9,117). No significant differences emerged comparing patients undergoing dEVT and bridging treatment for gender, hypertension, diabetes, National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score at admission. Regarding primary endpoint, IVT + EVT was superior to dEVT (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.22-1.69, p < 0.001, pheterogeneity<0.001), with number needed to treat being 18 in favor of IVT + EVT. Results were confirmed in studies with similar OGT (OR 1.66; 95% CI 1.21-2.28), shorter OGT for IVT + EVT (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.27-1.85), and independently from IVT eligibility (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.29-1.82). Mortality at 90 days was higher in dEVT (OR 1.38; 95% CI 1.09-1.75), but no significant difference was noted for sICH. However, considering data from RCT only, reperfusion strategies had similar primary (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.6-1.39) and secondary endpoints. Differences in age and clinical severity across groups were unrelated to the primary endpoint. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to dEVT, IVT + EVT associates with better functional outcome and lower mortality. Post hoc data from RCTs point to substantial equivalence of reperfusion strategies. Therefore, an adequately powered RCTs comparing dEVT versus IVT + EVT are warranted.

Large-Bore Aspiration Thrombectomy versus Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for Acute Pulmonary Embolism: A Propensity Score-Matched Comparison.

PURPOSE: To compare effectiveness and safety of large-bore aspiration thrombectomy (LBAT) with catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) for treatment of acute massive and submassive pulmonary embolism (PE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective review included patients with acute PE treated with LBAT or CDT using tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) between December 2009 and May 2020. A propensity score based on Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index class and PE severity (massive vs submassive) was calculated, and 26 LBAT cases (age 60.2 y ± 17.1, 14/26 women) were matched with 26 CDT cases (age 59.7 y ± 14.2, 14/26 women). RESULTS: The CDT group had 22.1 mg ± 8.1 tPA infused over 21.2 h ± 6.6. Both groups demonstrated similar initial and final systolic pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) (LBAT: 54.5 mm Hg ± 12.9 vs CDT: 54.5 mm Hg ± 16.3, P = .8, and LBAT: 42.5 mm Hg ± 14.1 vs CDT: 42.6 mm Hg ± 12.1, P = .8, respectively) and similar reductions in heart rate (LBAT: -5.4 beats/min ± 19.2 vs CDT: -9.6 beats/min ± 15.8, P = .4). CDT demonstrated a higher reduction in Miller score (-10.1 ± 3.9 vs -7.5 ± 3.8, P = .02). LBAT resulted in 1 minor hemorrhagic complication and 2 procedure-related mortalities, and CDT resulted in 1 minor and 1 major hemorrhagic complication. CONCLUSIONS: LBAT and CDT resulted in similar reductions of PAP and heart rate when used to treat acute PE. CDT reduced thrombus burden to a greater degree. Although hemorrhagic complications rates were not significantly different, the LBAT group demonstrated a higher rate of procedure-related mortality. Larger studies are needed to compare the safety of these techniques.

Ultrasound-Accelerated, Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for Submassive Pulmonary Embolism: Single-Center Retrospective Review with Intermediate-Term Outcomes.

PURPOSE: To evaluate ultrasound-accelerated, catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) for treatment of acute submassive pulmonary embolism (PE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single-center, retrospective study included patients who underwent CDT for acute submassive PE (N = 113, 52% men/48% women) from 2013 to 2017. Baseline characteristics included history of deep venous thrombosis (12%), history of PE (6%), and history of cancer (18%). Of cohort patients, 88% (n=99) had a simplified PE severity index score of ≥ 1 indicating a high risk of mortality. RESULTS: A technical success rate of 100% was achieved with 84% of patients having bilateral catheter placements. Average tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) therapy duration was 20.7 hours ± 1.5, and median tPA dose was 21.5 mg. Three patients (2.6%) experienced minor hemorrhagic complications. Mean hospital length of stay was 6 days. Mean pulmonary arterial pressure decreased from 55 mm Hg on presentation to 37 mm Hg (P < .01) 1 day following initiation of thrombolytic therapy. All-cause mortality rate of 4% (n = 4) was noted on discharge, which increased to 6% (n = 7) at 6 months. At 6-month follow-up compared with initial presentation, symptom improvements (93%), physiologic improvements (heart rate 72 beats/min vs 106 beats/min, P < .01), oxygen requirement improvements (fraction of inspired oxygen 20% vs 28%, P < .01), and right ventricular systolic pressure improvements by echocardiography (30 mm Hg vs 47 mm Hg, P < .01) were observed. CONCLUSIONS: CDT for acute submassive PE was associated with low complications and mortality, decreased right ventricular systolic pressure, high rates of clinical improvement, and improved intermediate-term clinical outcomes.