The Acute Antiallodynic Effect of Tolperisone in Rat Neuropathic Pain and Evaluation of Its Mechanism of Action.

Current treatment approaches to manage neuropathic pain have a slow onset and their use is largely hampered by side-effects, thus there is a significant need for finding new medications. Tolperisone, a centrally acting muscle relaxant with a favorable side effect profile, has been reported to affect ion channels, which are targets for current first-line medications in neuropathic pain. Our aim was to explore its antinociceptive potency in rats developing neuropathic pain evoked by partial sciatic nerve ligation and the mechanisms involved. Acute oral tolperisone restores both the decreased paw pressure threshold and the elevated glutamate level in cerebrospinal fluid in neuropathic rats. These effects were comparable to those of pregabalin, a first-line medication in neuropathy. Tolperisone also inhibits release of glutamate from rat brain synaptosomes primarily by blockade of voltage-dependent sodium channels, although inhibition of calcium channels may also be involved at higher concentrations. However, pregabalin fails to affect glutamate release under our present conditions, indicating a different mechanism of action. These results lay the foundation of the avenue for repurposing tolperisone as an analgesic drug to relieve neuropathic pain.

Pharmacological interventions other than botulinum toxin for spasticity after stroke.

BACKGROUND: The long-term risk of stroke increases with age, and stroke is a common cause of disability in the community. Spasticity is considered a significantly disabling impairment that develops in people who have had a stroke. The burden of care is higher in stroke survivors who have spasticity when compared with stroke survivors without spasticity with regard to treatment costs, quality of life, and caregiver burden. OBJECTIVES: To assess if pharmacological interventions for spasticity are more effective than no intervention, normal practice, or control at improving function following stroke. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (May 2016), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, 2016, Issue 5), MEDLINE (1946 to May 2016), Embase (2008 to May 2016), CINAHL (1982 to May 2016), AMED (1985 to May 2016), and eight further databases and trial registers. In an effort to identify further studies, we undertook handsearches of reference lists and contacted study authors and commercial companies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared any systemically acting or locally acting drug versus placebo, control, or comparative drug with the aim of treating spasticity. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed the studies for inclusion and extracted the data. We assessed the included studies for both quality and risk of bias. We contacted study authors to request further information when necessary. MAIN RESULTS: We included seven RCTs with a total 403 participants. We found a high risk of bias in all but one RCT. Two of the seven RCTs assessed a systemic drug versus placebo. We pooled data on an indirect measure of spasticity (160 participants) from these two studies but found no significant effect (odds ratio (OR) 1.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.21 to 13.07; I2 = 85%). We identified a significant risk of adverse events per participant occurring in the treatment group versus placebo group (risk ratio (RR) 1.65, 95% CI 1.12 to 2.42; 160 participants; I2 = 0%). Only one of these studies used a functional outcome measure, and we found no significant difference between groups.Of the other five studies, two assessed a systemic drug versus another systemic drug, one assessed a systemic drug versus local drug, and the final two assessed a local drug versus another local drug. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The lack of high-quality RCTs limited our ability to make specific conclusions. Evidence is insufficient to determine if systemic antispasmodics are effective at improving function following stroke.

Tolperisone hydrochloride improves motor functions in Parkinson's disease via MMP-9 inhibition and by downregulating p38 MAPK and ERK1/2 signaling cascade.

The mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway, particularly the p38 MAPK and ERK1/2, has been implicated in the pathogenesis of Parkinson's disease (PD). Recent studies have shown that MAPK signaling pathway can influence the expression of matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9), known for its involvement in various physiological and pathological processes, including neurodegenerative diseases. This study explores the modulation of MMP-9 expression via the MAPK/ERK signaling cascade and its potential therapeutic implications in the context of PD-associated motor dysfunction. Here, tolperisone hydrochloride (TL), a muscle relaxant that blocks voltage-gated sodium and calcium channels, was used as a treatment to observe its effect on MAPK signaling and MMP-9 expression. Rotenone (RT) exposure in mice resulted in a significant reduction in substantia nigra and primary motor cortex neurons, which were further evidenced by impairments in motor function. When TL was administered, neuron count was restored (89.0 ± 4.78 vs 117.0 ± 4.46/mm2), and most of the motor dysfunction was alleviated. Mechanistically, TL reduced the protein expression of phospho-p38MAPK (1.06 fold vs 1.00 fold) and phospho-ERK1/2 (1.16 fold vs 1.02 fold), leading to the inhibition of MAPK signaling, as well as reduced MMP-9 concentrations (2.76 ± 0.10 vs 1.94 ± 0.10 ng/mL) in the process of rescuing RT-induced neuronal cell death and motor dysfunction. Computational analysis further revealed TL's potential inhibitory properties against MMP-9 along with N and L-type calcium channels. These findings shed light on TL's neuroprotective effects via MMP-9 inhibition and MAPK signaling downregulation, offering potential therapeutic avenues for PD-associated motor dysfunction.

RESUME-1: a Phase III study of tolperisone in the treatment of painful, acute muscle spasms of the back.

Tolperisone is a nonopioid, centrally acting muscle relaxant in clinical development in the USA for the treatment of symptoms associated with acute, painful muscles spasms of the back. CLN-301, RESUME-1, is a 14-day double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group Phase III study of the efficacy and safety of tolperisone administered orally three-times daily in 1000 male and female subjects at approximately 70 clinical sites in the USA experiencing back pain due to or associated with muscle spasm of acute onset. Tolperisone is a promising therapeutic for managing acute, painful muscle spasms of the back as it appears to lack the off-target CNS effects often seen with conventional skeletal muscle relaxants. Clinical Trials registration number: NCT04671082.

A phase IV observational multi-centre, open-label study on efficacy and safety of tolperisone 150 mg in patients with painful muscle spasm associated with degenerative or inflammatory diseases of the musculoskeletal system.

AIMS: To generate real world clinical data on efficacy and tolerability of tolperisone 150 mg in painful muscle spasms in Indian population. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Prospective, open-labelled, non-comparative, multi-centre observational, Post Marketing surveillance study conducted at 174 participating orthopaedic care centres across India METHODS AND MATERIAL: Nine hundred and twenty adult patients having painful muscle spasm associated with degenerative or inflammatory conditions were enrolled who received tolperisone 150 mg thrice daily orally for 7 days. Assessment of primary efficacy (muscle spasm) was done by (0-3) Likert scale. Adverse events were monitored for safety and global efficacy assessment was done by clinicians and patients at the end of study period. RESULTS: Significant improvements from baseline (p < 0.0001) in scores for muscle tone, mobility & pain were seen on days 3 & 7. At the end of study there was a significant reduction in scores by more than 80% from baseline. A subgroup analysis revealed no statistical difference in the scores in patients receiving Non-Steroidal AntiInflammatory Drug (NSAID) as compared to those receiving Tolperisone alone suggesting that Tolperisone alone could be offered to patients with painful muscle spasm who are intolerant to NSAIDs or in whom NSAIDs are contraindicated. Tolperisone was well tolerated with no sedation reported by any patient during study period. The incidence of common adverse effects like nausea, gastric irritation was less than 2%. CONCLUSIONS: Tolperisone is a safe, effective and non sedative alternative in management of acute painful spasm conditions associated with degenerative or inflammatory diseases of the musculoskeletal system. Key Messages: Tolperisone is a skeletal muscle relaxant without concomitant sedation or withdrawal phenomena. In this open-labelled, non-comparative, prospective study tolperisone was proved to be a safe & effective alternative to skeletal muscle relaxants in the management of acute painful spasm conditions associated with degenerative or inflammatory diseases of the musculoskeletal system.

[The assessment of the clinical efficacy and tolerability of complex treatment of patients with acute low-back pain]. / Otsenka klinicheskoi effektivnosti i perenosimosti kompleksnoi terapii patsientov s ostroi bol'yu v nizhnei chasti spiny.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of different combinations of domestic generics meloxicam (amelotex), tolperisone (calmirex) and B vitamins (compligam B) in the treatment of acute low-back pain. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ninety patients with acute low-back pain (ICD-10 M54.5) were studied. Indications and prescribing of the drugs was carried out under the international generic name. Pain was assessed using a visual analog pain scale in mm (VAS). To relieve pain, all patients received the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug with a favorable safety profile meloxicam (amelotex). With the aim of optimization, 3 therapy regimens were proposed: group 1 (n=30) received amelotex, calmirex, and B vitamins (compligam B). Group 2 (n=30) received amelotex and calmirex. Group 3 (n=30) was treated with amelotex and compligam B. With a decrease in pain by 50% or more from the baseline level and a VAS <40 mm, patients could reduce the dose of amelotex from 15 to 7.5 mg or stop taking it. RESULTS: During treatment, all groups showed a significant regression of pain according to VAS: in group 1 from 77 to 9 mm, in group 2 from 74 to 12 mm, in group 3 from 69 to 14 mm. The maximum statistically significant reduction in pain and the degree of muscle tone was observed in group 1. Adverse reactions occurred in all groups, but they were weak and transient, and did not require correction or discontinuation of therapy. Only one patient from group 3 had a persistent rise in blood pressure. The average duration of temporary disability was 5.8 days in group 1, 7.4 in group 2, and 9.5 days in group 3. High efficacy and good tolerability of all 3 therapy regimens were noted. The combination of amelotex, calmirex and compligam B received the highest rating in the opinion of doctors and patients. CONCLUSION: All 3 treatment regimens optimize therapy in patients with acute low-back pain, reduce the dose and timing of the NSAID administration as well as the risk of adverse reactions. The results indicate that the combination of amelotex, calmirex and compligam B is a synergy of three pain relief systems due to the effect on different pathogenetic mechanisms, thereby providing the maximum analgesic effect, shortening the course of treatment and duration of temporary disability, reducing the risk of relapse and chronicity of pain.

[Results of a randomized double blind parallel study on the efficacy and safety of tolpersione in patients with acute nonspecific low back pain]. / Rezul'taty randomizirovannogo dvoinogo slepogo parallel'nogo issledovaniia éffektivnosti i bezopasnosti primeneniia tolperizona u patsientov s ostroi nespetsificheskoi bol'iu v nizhnei chasti spiny.

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tolpersione injection and oral formulations combined with NSAID over NSAID monotherapy in acute non-specific low back pain. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this randomized double blind study 239 patients were included in the per protocol analysis. The first 5 days of treatment, patients received tolpersione or placebo injection which was followed by per os administration of tolpersione/placebo tablet up to 14 days. NSAID diclofenac tablet was used in both groups through the study. Functionality assessed by the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) at day 5 was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints were RMDQ at other time points, pain level change at rest and on movement assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), the Clinical Global Impression of Improvement/Patient Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I and PGI-I), change in the range of motion assessed by the distance from the fingertips to the floor, period of disability days, relative (%) changes in the daily dose of diclofenac from the 7th to the 14th day of therapy. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The primary and secondary endpoints clearly demonstrated the significant superiority of tolpersione added to NSAID monotherapy over NSAID monotherapy. The safety assessment revealed no statistically significant differences between the two groups. Based on the results, tolpersione injection and per os formulations can be considered an effective and safe drugs in the combined therapy for patients with acute nonspecific back pain.

Comparative study of therapeutic response to baclofen vs tolperisone in spasticity.

BACKGROUND: Spasticity from the upper motor neuron syndrome can result from a variety of conditions affecting the cortex or spinal cord. Some of the more common conditions associated with spasticity include spinal cord injury, cerebral palsy, and post-stroke syndrome. In this study we compared the efficacy and safety of baclofen vs tolperisone in spasticity. One hundred fifty patients with cerebral palsy or post stroke or spinal cord injury associated spasticity were enrolled in present study. Group I comprised of Seventy-five patients receiving baclofen and group II comprised of 75 patients receiving tolperisone. For efficacy measurement 4 evaluation methods were used, 1) Modified Ashworth Scale for muscle tone, 2) Medical research council scale for muscle strength and 3) Barthel Index for functional outcome 4) Coefficient of efficacy. In efficacy evaluation, both groups showed significant improvement in muscle tone, muscle strength and functional outcome at week 6 (Group I, 1.55±0.053, 2.79+0.032, 59.31±1.32; Group II, 1.57±0.053, 3.04±0.032, 73±1.32 respectively). In between the group analysis, there was no significant difference in muscle tone improvement in both the groups after 6 weeks (Group I, 1.055±0.053 vs Group II, 1.57±0.053, p>0.05). Group II showed non-significant but greater improvement in muscle strength (Week 6; Group I, 2.79±0.032 vs Group II, 3.04±0.032, p>0.07). Improvement in functional outcomes was greater in group II as compared to group I (Group I, 59.31±1.32 vs Group II, 73±1.32, p<0.05). Overall efficacy coefficient was greater for group II (3.6) as compared to group I (2.3). Baclofen showed more side effects compared to tolperisone in, asthenia being the most frequent. Tolperisone offers greater improvement in activities of daily living compared to baclofen. Tolperisone is more tolerable drug as compared to baclofen.

[Midocalm in complex therapy of chronic low back pain syndrome].

The aim of the study was to determine whether application of midocalm is appropriate in patients with chronic low back pain (LBP) from the point of view of quality of life (QL), efficacy and tolerance. The subjects were 50 patients with chronic LBP associated with spinal osteochondrosis, who underwent clinical examination and were questioned using four QL questionnaires: Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), Womac osteoarthritis index Womac osteoarthritis index, Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire, and The 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). The subjects were divided into two groups. The 25 patients of Group I were administered nise in a dose of 100 mg twice a day during 10 days, the 25 patients of Group II--nise in a dose of 100 mg twice a day plus midocalm in a dose of 150 mg per day during the first two days and 450 mg per day from the third day through the tenth day. The study showed high efficacy of midocalm in complex therapy of patients with chronic LBP, as well as low rate of adverse reactions and high treatment tolerance. QL of the patients improved. Combining midocalm therapy with nise allows quicker positive effect in patients with chronic LBP and lowers need for long application of non-steroid antiinflammatory drugs.

[The results of the multicenter pharmaco-epidemiological observational project on the use of mydocalm in the treatment of pain syndromes with the muscle spasm].

The prospective multicenter open noncomparative pharmaco-epidemiological observational project on the use of mydocalm in real clinical practice has been completed in 2013. The project has been performed in 2090 clinical/rehabilitation settings in 284 cities of 13 countries using the results of 35,383 patients. The project aimed to assess the safety of treatment (percentage of patients with adverse-effects) and pain relieving efficacy as well as patient's satisfaction with the treatment. In total, 6603 (19%) adverse-effects were recorded. Their severity was evaluated as mild in 84,48%, no serious adverse-effects were noted. The high efficacy of mydocalm in the treatment of pain syndromes with the muscle spasm has been demonstrated. The high level of tolerability and absence of the clinically significant increase of adverse effects in the combination with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs have been confirmed.

Efficacy and tolerance of repeated oral doses of tolperisone hydrochloride in the treatment of painful reflex muscle spasm: results of a prospective placebo-controlled double-blind trial.

The efficacy and safety of oral tolperisone hydrochloride (Mydocalm) in the treatment of painful reflex muscle spasm was assessed in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. A total of 138 patients, aged between 20 and 75 years, with painful reflex muscle spasm associated with diseases of the spinal column or proximal joints were enrolled in eight rehabilitation centers. Patients were randomized to receive either 300 mg tolperisone hydrochloride or placebo for a period of 21 days. Both treatment groups recovered during the 3 weeks rehabilitation program. However, tolperisone hydrochloride proved to be significantly superior to placebo: the change score of the pressure pain threshold as the primary target parameter significantly increased during therapy with tolperisone hydrochloride (P = 0.03, valid-case-analysis) compared to the results obtained on placebo treatment. The overall assessment of efficacy by the patient also demonstrated significant differences in favor of tolperisone hydrochloride. Best results were seen in patients aged between 40 and 60 years with a history of complaints shorter than 1 year and with concomitant physical therapy. The evaluation of safety data, i.e., adverse events, biochemical and hematological laboratory parameters, demonstrated no differences between tolperisone hydrochloride and placebo. As a conclusion tolperisone hydrochloride represents an effective and safe treatment of painful reflex muscle spasm without the typical side effects of centrally active muscle relaxants.

Symptomatic treatment of neurolathyrism with tolperisone HCL (Mydocalm): a randomized double blind and placebo controlled drug trial.

The efficacy and safety of oral Tolperisone HCL was evaluated in double blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial in 72 patients with neurolathyrism in stages I, II, and III of the disease at Kolla Duba Health Centre of Dembia District of North Gondar between January and April 1995. Taken orally daily for 12 weeks, tolperisone HCL (Mydocalm) in a dose of 150 milligrams (mgs) twice daily significantly improved subjective complaints such as muscle cramps, heaviness of the legs, startle attacks, flexor spasms and repeated falls. An overall subjective improvement was observed in 75% of the patients on tolperisone HCL and 39% of the placebo group (P = 0.002). When objectively assessed spastic muscle tone in the abductors, stiffness of Achilles and spontaneous ankle clonus were significantly reduced in tolperisone HCL group (P values = 0.001, 0.04, and 0.0001, respectively). Walking ability and speed of walking was also significantly improved. The drug is most effective in relieving symptoms of stage I and stage II disease. Some adverse effects like muscle pain, generalized body weakness and dizziness were recorded in patients taking the drug but all were minor and self limited, none requiring discontinuation of treatment. It is concluded that tolperisone is a well tolerated and efficacious drug for symptomatic treatment of neurolathyrism.

[Mydeton: a centrally acting muscle relaxant drug from Gedeon Richter LTD]. / Mydeton: a Richter centrális támadáspontú izomrelaxánsa.

Since its introduction in 1959 tolperisone hydrochloride (Mydeton) is still one of the leading products of Gedeon Richter Ltd. It has been successfully applied for treating different painful muscle spasms. The compound is successfully marketed also by several foreign, mostly Japanese, pharmaceutical companies, as a central muscle relaxant agent. The present summary overviews the pharmacology of tolperisone, with special emphasize on its still partly understood way of action. Data from the scientific literature as well as our own experimental results strongly support the hypothesis that inhibition of voltage gated sodium channels is a major component of the mechanism of action of tolperisone. The paper also summarizes the clinical results with tolperisone and the perspectives of the therapeutic use of centrally acting muscle relaxants.

[Restorative treatment of degenerative-dystrophic diseases of large joints]. / Vosstanovitel'noe lechenie degenerativno-distroficheskikh zabolevanii krupnykh sustavov.

The authors performed courses of treatment with Midocalm in 110 patients according to their original method. It reduced the pain syndrome, increased the volume of movements in the joint and shortened the time of treatment.

[Treatment of neurosensory hypoacusis of antibiotic and non-antibiotic etiology with mydocalm and nootropil: comparison of efficacy]. / Sravnitel'naya otsenka effektivnosti lecheniya antibiotikovoy i neantibiotikovoy etiologii midokalmom v sochetanii s nootropilom.

Mydocalm and nootropil combination was used for treatment of antibiotic neurosensory hypoacusia (24 patients) and non-antibiotic hypoacusis (11 patients). 100 mg of mydocalm was diluted in 10.0 ml of 0.9% sodium chloride and injected intravenously. 20% solution of nootropil (5.0 ml) was injected intramuscularly. The 14-day course produced subjective response. Noise in the ears and heavy head feeling disappeared. As shown by measurements of auditory thresholds, improvement of hearing was only subjective. The responses were similar in both groups of patients.

[Reasons for the use of mydocalm in the prevention and treatment of antibiotic-induced sensorineural hearing loss]. / Obosnovanie primeneniia midokalma pri profilaktiki i lecheniia neirosensornoi tugoukhosti antibiotikovoi étiologii.

The applicability of mydocalm for the prevention and therapy of hypoacusis caused by kanamycin, an antibiotic of the aminoglycoside series, was investigated in animal (guinea-pig) experiments. The changes in nucleic acids and nuclear size of the spiral organ were used as parameters. Hearing loss as shown by the lack of Preyer's reflex developed in response to kanamycin injected at a dose of 50 mg/kg/day for 14 days. In the spiral organ nuclei of hair cells were in the state of functional shrinkage. The use of mydocalm at a dose of 12 mg/kg in parallel with or after kanamycin injection nuclei of receptor cells did not shrink, Preyer's reflex did not disappear (in the case of parallel administration of mydocalm and kanamycin) or recovered (in the case of mydocalm administration after kanamycin injection). In summary, mydocalm as a vasoactive and neurotrophic drug can be used for the prophylaxis and therapy of hypoacusis caused by aminoglycoside antibiotics and can be recommended for practical application.