Efficacy and safety of narrowband ultraviolet B versus combined ultraviolet A/narrowband ultraviolet B phototherapy in the treatment of chronic atopic dermatitis: A randomised double-blind study.

Phototherapy is a useful treatment modality for atopic dermatitis (AD). This is a prospective randomised double-blind study comparing the clinical efficacy of combined ultraviolet-A (UVA)/narrowband ultraviolet-B (NBUVB) versus NBUVB phototherapy in the treatment of chronic AD. Patients with moderate-to-severe AD were randomised to receive either UVA/NBUVB or NBUVB phototherapy twice weekly over 12 weeks. At baseline, weeks 6 and 12, Eczema Area And Severity Index (EASI), itch score and adverse effects were assessed. At baseline and week 12, disease-related quality of life was evaluated using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Nine patients were randomised to receive UVA/NBUVB and 10 received NBUVB. At week 12, both groups showed significant improvement in EASI and itch scores (p < 0.05). Significant improvement in DLQI was seen in the UVA/NBUVB arm (p = 0.009) with a trend towards improvement in the NBUVB arm (p = 0.11). The efficacy of both modalities were comparable, as were reported adverse effects aside from skin dryness which was higher in the NBUVB arm (40% vs. 0%, p = 0.033). Combined UVA/NBUVB and NBUVB phototherapy have comparable clinical efficacy and safety in the treatment of chronic AD. NBUVB may induce greater skin dryness.

Incidence and profile of skin cancers in patients following ultraviolet phototherapy without psoralens: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Psoralen + ultraviolet-A (PUVA) is associated with photocarcinogenesis. However, carcinogenic risk with other ultraviolet phototherapies remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate whether phototherapy without psoralens increases skin cancer risk. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of patients treated at a teaching-hospital phototherapy center (1977-2018). Skin cancer records were validated against pathology reports. Age-standardized incidence rates (ASIRs) of skin cancer were evaluated for gender, skin phototype, diagnosis, ultraviolet modality, anatomical site; and compared to provincial population incidence rates (2003). RESULTS: In total, 3506 patients treated with broadband-ultraviolet-B, narrowband-UVB and/or combined UVAB were assessed with a mean follow-up of 7.3 years. Majority of patients had psoriasis (60.9%) or eczema (26.4%). Median number of treatments was 43 (1-3598). Overall, 170 skin cancers (17 melanoma, 33 squamous cell carcinoma and 120 basal cell carcinoma) occurred in 79 patients. Patient-based and tumor-based ASIR of skin cancer was 149 (95% CI: 112-187)/100,000 and 264 (219-309)/100,000 person-years, respectively. There was no significant difference between tumor-based ASIRs for melanoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and basal cell carcinoma compared to the general population; or in phototherapy patients with-psoriasis or eczema; or immunosuppressants. No cumulative dose-response correlation between UVB and skin cancer was seen. LIMITATIONS: Treatment and follow-up duration. CONCLUSION: No increased risk of melanoma and keratinocyte cancer was found with phototherapy.

Treatment of oral graft-versus-host disease with intraoral nbUVB phototherapy.

PURPOSE: There are limited treatment options available for hematopoietic stem-cell transplant patients (HSCT) with oral graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Intraoral phototherapy is a novel, yet promising therapeutic regimen. RESEARCH QUESTION: To assess the safety and effectiveness of intraoral narrowband UVB (nbUVB) phototherapy in the treatment of oral GVHD. METHODS: This case series evaluated 10 patients with refractory oral GVHD, who were treated at Northwestern Memorial Hospital with nbUVB between July 2019 and October 2023. Primary outcomes were to evaluate the safety and efficacy of phototherapy. Efficacy was measured by objective improvement in symptom scores and subjective improvement in patient reported symptoms. Safety was determined by the withdrawal due to adverse events. Total nbUVB exposure, number of treatments, and change in systemic immunosuppressive medications were also examined. RESULTS: The study cohort comprised 10 patients who developed oral GVHD at a median of 9.5 months after HSCT. The total median dose of nbUVB was 36 J/cm2, and the median number of sessions was 55. All 10 patients demonstrated some degree of improvement in symptoms. Notably, there was a reduction in the number of patients who reported symptoms of oral pain (83%), bleeding (67%), xerostomia (50%), and oral sensitivity (78%) after initiating phototherapy. There was also a statistically significant decrease in the levels of pain, erythema, and edema (p ≤ 0.001, < 0.001, 0.01, respectively). Most patients tolerated phototherapy well, but 1 patient withdrew from treatment due to adverse effects. Seventy-five percent of patients who were on immunosuppressive medications were able to decrease or stop these medications. CONCLUSION: This case series suggests that nbUVB phototherapy is well tolerated and efficacious in patients with oral GVHD.

Tolerability of Narrow-band Ultraviolet-B Phototherapy for Different Dermatological Diseases in Relation to Co-medications.

Phototherapy is an efficient therapy for a variety of skin diseases. Various drugs can cause photosensitivity and impact tolerability of phototherapy. The tolerability was investigated of narrowband ultraviolet-B 311 nm therapy in dependence on the underlying disease and long-term co-medication. A total of 534 narrowband ultraviolet-B therapy courses were examined. Compared with psoriasis, adverse events were observed more frequently in eczematous diseases and, in some cases, other indications. About two-thirds of all courses were carried out in patients taking at least one photosensitising drug, according to the summaries of product characteristics. Phototherapy was more frequently associated with adverse events when medication was taken concomitantly. When considering the tolerability of phototherapy in dependence on individual substances or drug classes, no statistically significant result was shown after adjustment.

Skin Cancer Risk of Narrow-Band UV-B (TL-01) Phototherapy: A Multi-Center Registry Study with 4,815 Patients.

Narrow-band TL-01 ultraviolet B phototherapy (TL-01) is an effective and widely used treatment for many skin diseases. The purpose of the investigation was to assess the risk of skin cancers in patients treated with TL-01 phototherapy who have not received any other phototherapy modalities. This cohort study included 4,815 TL-01 treated patients in Finland with psoriasis or atopic dermatitis. Clinical information was collected from the hospital records and linked with Finnish Cancer Registry data. The follow-up started from the first TL-01 treatment and the mean follow-up time was 8.4 years. Standardized incidence ratios were calculated for basal cell carcinoma, cutaneous melanoma, and squamous cell carcinoma. The standardized incidence ratio for basal cell carcinoma was 2.5 (95% confidence interval 1.8-3.5), for cutaneous melanoma 4.0 (95% confidence interval 2.1-6.8) and for squamous cell carcinoma 3.7 (95% confidence interval 1.7-7.0). For basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma, the standardized incidence ratios remained similar during the whole follow-up time while the standardized incidence ratio for cutaneous melanoma was markedly higher during the first 5 years of follow-up. In conclusion, an increased incidence of skin cancers was observed among TL-01 treated patients. It should be confirmed in the future whether the skin cancer risk of TL-01 phototherapy will remain high in a longer follow-up.

Phototherapy for the treatment of atopic dermatitis in Singaporean children and adolescents.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Phototherapy has emerged as a safe yet effective form of treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD). Few studies have been done to evaluate the efficacy of phototherapy in Asian children. The aim of this study was to review the phototherapy experience in a cohort of Asian pediatric patients with AD at a tertiary dermatologic center in Singapore. METHODS: A retrospective study of patients 18 years and below with AD who had undergone phototherapy at KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, over a 4-year period was performed. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were identified, between ages 4 and 16 years (mean age 11 years) at the time of commencement of phototherapy. Thirty-five (60%) patients were males and 23 (40%) were females. Most patients had moderate to severe disease, with 60.3% of the patients with an initial body surface area (BSA) involvement of 31%-60% and 13.8% of the patients with an initial BSA involvement of 61%-90%. For patients who had undergone narrowband ultraviolet B (NBUVB) and combined ultraviolet A (UVA) and NBUVB phototherapy, the mean reduction of the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) scores were 11.4 and 7.9, respectively. Common side effects experienced include xerosis, pruritus, erythema, and pain. Other reasons for cessation of therapy in the NBUVB group included time commitment difficulty (9.3%), hyperactivity (2.3%), and claustrophobia (2.3%). Two patients that had photochemotherapy (psoralen + UVA) [PUVA] suffered from post-UVA burns requiring cessation of treatment. More than half of the patients (56.9%) treated with phototherapy experienced treatment success with improvement in Investigator Global Assessment and EASI scores. 86.2% of the patients had good compliance to the treatment regime, 12% had poor-compliance, and 3.4% were lost to follow-up. CONCLUSION: Phototherapy is a useful treatment adjunct for moderate to severe AD in Asian children.

Frequency of skin cancer among psoriasis, vitiligo, and mycosis fungoides patients treated with narrowband ultraviolet B phototherapy.

BACKGROUND: Narrowband ultraviolet B (NB-UVB) phototherapy is a popular and relatively contemporary treatment option. However, only a few studies to date have explored the potential risk of skin cancer following NB-UVB treatment. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the potential long-term risk of skin cancer in patients treated with NB-UVB. METHODS: This cohort study included patients with psoriasis, vitiligo, and mycosis fungoides treated with NB-UVB at two university hospitals in Israel in 2000-2005. Patients were followed up for skin cancer for at least 10 years. Data were extracted from the hospital and community medical records. RESULTS: A total of 767 patients were included in this study: 509 with psoriasis, 122 with vitiligo, and 136 with mycosis fungoides. The mean follow-up duration was 13 years. Among these patients, 4.43% developed skin cancer during the follow-up (3.93% had psoriasis, 2.46% had vitiligo, and 8.09% had mycosis fungoides). Old age and fair skin type were the only significant independent risk factors for skin cancer. There was no significant difference in the mean number of NB-UVB treatments among patients who developed skin cancer and those who did not (99.09 vs. 94.79, respectively). CONCLUSION: No association was observed between the number of NB-UVB treatments and carcinogenesis in any study group. Age is a significant risk factor, and older patients treated with NB-UVB should be followed up carefully.

Carcinogenic risk in patients treated with UVA-1 phototherapy: A 5-year retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: UVA-1 phototherapy was first used to treat atopic dermatitis and afterwards to several other skin diseases. The contribution of UVA-1 in human photocarcinogenesis, skin photoaging, immune suppression, and hyperpigmentation is now well established. The actual contribution of UVA-1 radiation to the development of malignant melanoma (MM) in humans cannot be excluded. PURPOSE: The aim of the study is to evaluate the risk of developing skin cancers (non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSCs) and MM) in patients treated with UVA-1 phototherapy with a 5-year dermatological follow-up. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study with 31 patients with morphea and atopic dermatitis treated with medium dose UVA-1 phototherapy (34 J/cm2). All enrolled patients underwent an oncologic prevention visit annually with a 5-year follow-up with clinical evaluation of the entire skin surface. RESULTS: During the 5-year follow-up, we recorded a case of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) in the cervical region and one case of MM on the back (pT1a). In both cases, the patients were female and affected by morphea. The Glogau 3 group is prevalent (42%), which is consistent with moderate to severe aging; the data appear to be compatible with the age. CONCLUSIONS: This study attests that medium-dose UVA-1 phototherapy does not increase the risk of developing skin tumors and that UVA-1 phototherapy is not a worsening factor of facial photoaging. The main limitation of the study is the small sample size, avoiding to obtain statistically significant values. It was not possible to analyze individually the actual daily sun exposure during the 5-year observation period and to correlate it in terms of time and tumor development. Further studies with large sample sizes will be needed to confirm our data. Our study reaffirms how the dermatological examination performed annually is essential in the follow-up of patients undergoing this type of therapy.

Chronic Radiation Dermatitis Secondary to Narrow-Band Ultraviolet B Therapy in a Patient With Primary Cutaneous CD8 + T-Cell Lymphoma With Cytotoxic Granules.

ABSTRACT: Conventional therapies for CD8 + cutaneous T-cell lymphoma include topical steroids, topical nitrogen mustard, topical bexarotene, ultraviolet B therapy, psoralen and ultraviolet A therapy, local radiotherapy, and interferon alfa; however, these treatments are often found to be ineffective. Presented is a case of CD8 + cutaneous T-cell lymphoma with near-complete response to narrow-band ultraviolet therapy because of chronic radiation dermatitis initially believed to be possible progression of a CD8 + cutaneous epidermotropic cytotoxic T-cell lymphoma.

Narrowband-ultraviolet B vs Broadband-ultraviolet B in Treatment of Chronic Pruritus: A Randomized, Single-blinded, Non-inferiority Study.

Narrowband-ultraviolet B has shown increased efficacy over broadband-ultraviolet B in pruritic skin diseases, such as psoriasis and atopic dermatitis. In patients with chronic pruritus, e.g. in end-stage renal disease, broadband-ultraviolet B is recommended, but narrowband-ultraviolet B has also shown efficacy in reducing pruritus. This randomized, single blinded, non-inferiority study investigated the effects of narrowband-ultraviolet B compared with broadband-ultraviolet B. Patients with chronic pruritus were treated with either broadband- or narrowband-UVB 3 times a week for 6 weeks and clinical response was monitored. Pruritus, sleep disturbance, and the patients' subjective overall response to treatment were evaluated by the patients on a visual analogue scale (0-10). Skin excoriations were evaluated by investigators on a 4-point scale (0-3). Both phototherapeutic modalities showed significant antipruritic activity (itch reduction 48% and 66.4%, respectively) by broadband-ultraviolet B and narrowband-ultraviolet B. Narrowband-ultraviolet B proved to be not inferior to broadband-ultraviolet B in treating pruritus in patients with chronic pruritus, assuming a 20% non-inferiority margin.

Narrowband ultraviolet B phototherapy for pityriasis lichenoides: A real-life experience.

INTRODUCTION: Pityriasis lichenoides (PL) is a papulosquamous disease affecting both children and adults, for which narrowband-UVB (NB-UVB) phototherapy is regarded as a commonly used treatment option. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of NB-UVB phototherapy in the management of PL and to compare response rates in pediatric and adult age groups. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This observational, retrospective study included 20 PL patients (12 pityriasis lichenoides chronica; PLC, 8 pityriasis lichenoides et varioliformis acuta; PLEVA) who failed to respond to other treatment modalities. The data for this study were collected retrospectively from patient follow-up forms in the phototherapy unit. RESULTS: A complete response (CR) was obtained in all pediatric patients with PL, while 53.8% of adult patients had achieved CR. The mean cumulative dose required to achieve the CR was higher in pediatric patients than adult patients with PL (p < .05). The CR was achieved in 6 (75%) of 8 PLEVA patients, while 8 (66.7%) of 12 PLC patients had reached to CR. The mean number of exposures for patients with PLC to achieve a CR was higher than patients with PLEVA (p < .05). Erythema was the most common adverse effect during phototherapy particularly in 5 (35.7%) of the patients with PL who had achieved CR. CONCLUSIONS: NB-UVB is an effective and well-tolerated treatment option for PL especially in diffuse types. A higher response can be obtained in children with higher cumulative dose. Patients with PLC may require more exposures for CR than patients with PLEVA.

Bath-PUVA still represents a valuable treatment option for the subsets of psoriatic patients who are not eligible to or rejecting systemic treatments and are not responsive to NB-UVB phototherapy.

BACKGROUND: Photochemotherapy with bathwater delivery of psoralens plus UVA exposures (bath-PUVA) is mainly used for those psoriatic patients who are not responsive to narrowband (NB)-UVB phototherapy and oral-PUVA therapy and belong to two categories (1) patients with psoriasis without systemic comorbidities who do not need long-term continuous treatment and (2) patients who have contraindications to immunosuppressive drugs and oral-PUVA or refuse systemic drugs, including oral ingestion of psoralens, for personal reasons. However, it is not known how many patients belong to the second group and how much bath-PUVA is effective and safe for them. METHODS: We have reviewed the treatment results of a cohort of 120 patients with clinical indication to bath-PUVA for the above-mentioned reasons between 2010 and 2019. These patients were selected among 2640 patients with moderate and severe psoriasis who were treated in our department in the same time interval. RESULTS: Ninety-six patients completed at least one treatment cycle with bath-PUVA. A per-protocol analysis showed that average number of treatment sessions was 21.3 ± 9.0 and the cumulative UVA dose was 80.4 ± 60.0 J/cm2 . The average PASI scores decreased from 20.8 ± 7.9 to 5.1 ± 5.4 (p < .01). Sixty-seven (69.7%) patients achieved at least a 75% improvement (PASI75 ) and, of them, 38 (39.6%) had an improvement greater than 90% (PASI90 ). Adverse effects were mild and transitory. CONCLUSION: These findings demonstrate that bath-PUVA is still a valuable treatment option for a high number of patients who reject systemic treatments or have contraindications to systemic immune-modifying drugs and have had a limited or no improvement with NB-UVB phototherapy.

PUVA therapy in persistent cutaneous histiocytosis: Case report and literature review.

BACKGROUND: Cutaneous and mucocutaneous histiocytosis (group C) comprise a wide variety of entities affecting skin and/or mucosae. Although they are considered as reactive proliferations, their exact pathophysiology remains unknown and, therefore, they lack a specific treatment. AIMS: The aim of this study is to review the evidence on cases of histiocytosis treated with UVB and/or UVA and to report a new case of relapsing group C histiocytosis that has been successfully treated with PUVA therapy. MATERIALS & METHODS: We have conducted a review of the literature published over the last 40 years on the treatment of histiocytosis with phototherapy in the online PubMed database. We also describe a new case of successful treatment of histiocytosis with PUVA therapy. RESULTS: Our patient was a 27-year-old man with persistent outbreaks of cutaneous histiocytosis over the previous 8 years. He responded successfully to PUVA therapy, and no relapse has been detected after one year of follow-up. DISCUSSION: Self-involution is usual in group C histiocytosis, so conservative management is usually the first approach. Relapsing cases pose a therapeutic challenge. Reported treatment options for these patients include isotretinoin, cryotherapy, immunosuppressants, low-dose chemotherapy, CO2 laser, radiotherapy, and surgery. Phototherapy and photochemotherapy have been used in a small number of patients with considerable success. The main limitation to provide firm recommendations on histiocytosis therapy is the absence of solid evidence, as the articles published are mainly case reports with a short follow-up. In our patient, despite the short follow-up we have considered photochemotherapy to be effective since no spontaneous remission had been achieved in the previous 8 years. CONCLUSION: PUVA therapy could be a safe and effective option to treat persistent cutaneous manifestations in patients with histiocytosis, although more evidence is required to support this statement.

Efficacy of ultraviolet A1 phototherapy for inflammatory, sclerotic and neoplastic dermatological diseases: A 10-year tertiary referral center experience.

BACKGROUND: Ultraviolet (UV) A1 phototherapy is considered a beneficial treatment for various inflammatory, sclerotic, malignant, and other skin conditions. However, the available data regarding its efficacy for different indications, the potential side effects, and the recommended treatment protocols are sparse. OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy of UVA1 phototherapy and identify correlation between different indications and treatment protocols to response rates. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of a cohort of 335 patients treated with UVA1 phototherapy at the Department of Dermatology at Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel, between 2008 and 2018. RESULTS: The study population included 163 patients with inflammatory diseases (mainly atopic dermatitis and other types of eczema), 67 patients with sclerotic diseases (morphea and graft versus host disease), nine patients with neoplastic diseases (cutaneous T cell lymphoma), and 188 patients with other cutaneous disorders. Response rates ranged between 85% and 89% across indications, without differences in response rates among the indication groups (p = .941). In a multivariant logistic regression model, increased number of treatments and higher maximal dosages were associated with response to treatment (p < .001). Using ROC analysis, a cut-off of 8 UVA1 phototherapy treatments was chosen as predictive for beneficial response (86.4% sensitivity, 78% specificity). A cut-off of 40 J/cm2 was chosen as an optimal maximal dosage for differentiating between responders and non-responders (51.1% sensitivity, 83.1% specificity). CONCLUSIONS: UVA1 phototherapy is an effective treatment for a variety of skin conditions. In most patients, at least eight treatments of a medium-high dosage are required for clinical response.

Incidence of skin malignancies in patients with vitiligo or psoriasis who received narrowband ultraviolet B phototherapy (308 nm/311 nm): A retrospective review of 3730 patients.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies regarding the risk of skin malignancy with NBUVB have been performed in Caucasian patients, but few studies have been conducted in Asians. AIM: The aim of the study was to determine the risk of skin cancer in Asian patients with psoriasis and vitiligo receiving NBUVB phototherapy. METHODS: We performed a 9-year retrospective study including all patients with psoriasis and vitiligo receiving NBUVB (either 311 nm wavelength through cabin phototherapy or 308 nm through excimer lamp phototherapy) at the National Skin Centre. We matched the identification numbers of patients to the National Registry of Diseases Office database and collected data on all skin cancers diagnosed. RESULTS: A total of 3730 patients were included. During the course of the study, 12 cases of skin cancer were diagnosed, of which 10 were basal cell carcinomas, and 2 were squamous cell carcinomas. No cases of melanoma were detected in the study. The age-standardized incidence of skin cancer in psoriasis and vitiligo patients who received phototherapy was 47.5 and 26.5, respectively, which is higher than the incidence of skin cancers in the general population. Risk of skin malignancy was positively correlated with the cumulative (p = .008) and maximum dose of phototherapy (p = .011) as well as previous systemic treatments (p = .006). LIMITATIONS: Limitations include a relatively short follow-up period as well as the lack of quantification of solar exposure. CONCLUSIONS: NBUVB phototherapy in Asian skin increases the risk of skin malignancy. The risk of skin malignancy is higher with psoriasis patients, greater cumulative and maximal dose of phototherapy as well as the use of systemic therapy. Despite the increased risk, the absolute number of skin malignancies remains low, especially for vitiligo patients, with no cases of melanoma diagnosed-a reassuring finding that phototherapy remains a safe alternative in the treatment of psoriasis and vitiligo.

Utility of phototherapy in patients with systemic sclerosis: Systematic review.

Phototherapy is a recommended treatment regimen for different scleroderma spectrum disorders, but so far it has been included neither by European nor by worldwide experts committee in recommendations for the treatment of systemic sclerosis (SSc). The aim of the study was to revisit the utility of dermatological phototherapy in patients with SSc. PubMed using medical subject headings was searched to identify studies evaluating response to dermatological phototherapy in SSc patients. Both UVA1 (340-400 nm) and PUVA (psoralen plus UVA) treatments were found to reduce skin thickening and increase skin elasticity, therefore allowing for the improvement of joint tension mobility, especially in hands. At least several papers showed efficacy of phototherapy in patients who remained non-responsive to previous immunosuppressive therapies. The most probable mechanisms of action of phototherapy in SSc include inhibition of T-cells and prevention from dermal fibrosis. Although most data on the efficacy of phototherapy come from small experimental studies and case reports, phototherapy based on UVA of wavelength manifests relatively mild spectrum of side effects and this should be considered as a treatment option for SSc with dominant cutaneous involvement.

The use of interferon-α2a as monotherapy in stage IB patients with mycosis fungoides: A retrospective chart review of patient outcomes.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the response to IFN-α2a treatment as monotherapy in stage IB patients with mycosis fungoides (MF) in second-line therapy. Twenty-five patients with recurrent or persistent MF were included in the study. The diagnosis of MF was established according to clinical and histopathological signs. Clinical staging was made using TNMB classification. IFN-α2a as monotherapy was used as treatment. IFN-α2a was administered at a dose of 3 x 106 units thrice a week subcutaneously as initially described. According to clinical tolerance, the dose was increased every 4 weeks to 6 - 9 x 106 units. IFN-α2a was used more frequently for at least 3 months after complete remission. Treatment success was evaluated with Clinical Response (disappearance of all clinical evidence = Complete Remission [CR], ≥50% decrease in extent or severity = Partial Remission [PR], unresponsiveness to treatment = Stable Disease [SD], progression of MF = Progressive Disease [PD]). The average age was 51.3 ± 9.1. CR and PR were achieved in 11 (44%) and 12 (48%) patients, respectively. PD was observed in two (8%) patients. CR was accomplished at 16.1 ± 9.8 weeks. Recurrences were mostly observed within 1 year (10.4 ± 7.7 months). The recurrence rate was 45.4%. The mean duration of CR was 33.3 ± 7.9 months. Side effects were seen in 36% of the patients (18.2% in CR). The most common side effect was fatigue (12%). The patients received 11 different types of treatment before IFN-α2a treatment. The most frequent therapy prior to IFN-α2a treatment was narrow-band ultraviolet-B (NB-UVB) phototherapy (15 [60%] patients). CR can be achieved in a relatively short period of time in patients receiving IFN-α2a in MF. The duration of CR is reasonable. The side effects of IFN-α2a are acceptable. Therefore, IFN-α2a as monotherapy is a good option in stage IB second-line MF therapy.

Combination of carboxytherapy with narrowband-ultraviolet B in the treatment of recalcitrant areas of vitiligo: A randomized clinical trial.

Carboxytherapy has been used in the treatment of autoimmune skin diseases such as psoriasis and morphea. Carboxytherapy has antioxidant effects, and leads to better tissue oxygenation, and release of growth factors. In this article, we decided to evaluate efficacy of combined carboxytherapy and narrowband-ultraviolet B (NB-UVB) compared to NB-UVB alone in the treatment of vitiligo. This is a prospective, split-body double-blind comparative study performed in patients with generalized stable vitiligo in acral areas and extremities referred to dermatology clinic of Afzalipour hospital in Kerman University of Medical Sciences. NB-UVB was performed three times a week in non-consecutive days for 4 months. In each patient, one lesion was randomly treated with carboxytherapy (weekly sessions for total of 16 sessions). Efficacy of treatment was evaluated by percentage of repigmentation of the lesions. Chi-square test and analysis of variance test (ANOVA) were used to compare efficacy of treatment based on demographic features of the patients and clinical features of the lesions, respectively. Twenty-eight patients with mean age of 32.35 ± 7.37 years old completed the study. At the end of the treatment, 37% of the patients in combination therapy group demonstrated more than 75% improvement compared to 0% in the monotherapy group (p = 0.001). There was no significant difference between either demographic features of the patients (age, sex, and skin phototypes) or duration of disease with efficacy of the treatment in both groups. Combination of carboxytherapy with NB-UVB leads to higher percentage of repigmentation and patients' satisfaction compared to monotherapy with NB-UVB.

A pilot study of combined oral minocycline and narrowband UVB phototherapy in vitiligo: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Narrowband ultraviolet B (NBUVB) phototherapy is an effective therapeutic option for generalized vitiligo. Previous reports showed the potential benefit of minocycline to stop disease progression in vitiligo. Meanwhile, minocycline has antioxidative, anti-inflammatory, and immunomodulating properties. There is no clinical study combining oral minocycline and NBUVB for treating generalized vitiligo. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of the combination treatment of NBUVB plus oral minocycline with NBUVB alone in generalized vitiligo. A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled pilot study was conducted. Patients were randomly treated with either combined oral minocycline 100 mg per day plus NBUVB phototherapy or placebo plus NBUVB. All patients recieved NBUVB two times per week, for 12 weeks. The outcomes were assessed using Vitiligo Area Scoring Index score (VASI) percent change, quartile grading scale (QGS) of repigmentation, and Vitiligo Disease Activity Index (VIDA) score. Fourteen generalized vitiligo patients were included, and seven cases were assigned in each group. At week 12, the mean VASI score was decreased by 28.87% (24.15) in the minocycline group compared to 27.26% (7.98) in placebo group (p = 0.886). No significant difference was observed between both treatment modalities in QGS of repigmentation and mean VIDA score change. Two of the seven patients (29%) receiving minocycline developed hyperpigmentation, dark-brown and muddy brown discoloration, which was only confined to some vitiliginous patches. In conclusion, combination therapy with oral minocycline does not enhance the efficacy of NBUVB in generalized vitiligo. Due to the high incidence of drug-induced skin hyperpigmentation, minocycline plus NBUVB should be avoided.

Risk of cutaneous carcinogenesis with phototherapy in Indian subpopulation: A 10-year analysis and a review of literature.

Phototherapy is an extremely effective and established therapeutic modality in a variety of dermatological disorders. However, there has been a constant concern with respect to its long-term usage as some of the studies have identified the risk of cutaneous malignancy associated with phototherapy. The carcinogenic potential of PUVA has been demonstrated in most US studies; however, the studies done on Asian and Arabian-African population have not corroborated similar findings, thus suggesting that the darker skin may confer protection against the development of cutaneous malignancy following phototherapy. The main aim of the present study was to assess the safety of phototherapy (bath PUVA and NBUVB) in Indian population (Fitzpatrick skin types IV and V) with respect to its carcinogenic potential and to determine the maximum cumulative dose that our patients could tolerate without developing any untoward complications such as cutaneous malignancy. All patients who received phototherapy between January 2006 and October 2016 were enrolled in the study. Details such as cumulative dose, number of phototherapy sessions received, indication for phototherapy, adverse effects such as pigmentary changes, new growths on the skin surface following the therapeutic sessions were entered in a predesigned proforma. This ambispective study had 1300 patients who had received phototherapy over a period of 10 years. A total of 929 patients had received PUVA, and the remaining 371 patients had received NBUVB for various dermatological indications. The average follow-up period for PUVA was 3 years and 6.5 years for NBUVB. The maximum cumulative dose of UVA and UVB that could be safely administered in our patients was 2085 J/cm2 and 1985 mJ/cm2, respectively. None of our patients developed any features of cutaneous malignancy during their follow-up. Both bath-PUVA and NBUVB are safe and efficacious in treating patients of darker skin types (IV and V). The risk of developing cutaneous malignancy is negligible in this subset of patients. However, more studies need to be done on the Asian population to substantiate the same.