Phase 1b Trial Evaluating Tolerability and Activity of Targeted Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor Inhibition in Localized Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.

PURPOSE: We initiated a biomarker-informed preoperative study of infigratinib, a fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitor, in patients with localized upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), a population with high unmet needs and tumor with a high frequency of FGFR3 alterations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with localized UTUC undergoing ureteroscopy or nephroureterectomy/ureterectomy were enrolled on a phase 1b trial (NCT04228042). Once-daily infigratinib 125 mg by mouth × 21 days (28-day cycle) was given for 2 cycles. Tolerability was monitored by Bayesian design and predefined stopping boundaries. The primary endpoint was tolerability, and the secondary endpoint was objective response based on tumor mapping, done after endoscopic biopsy and post-trial surgery. Total planned enrollment: 20 patients. Targeted sequencing performed using a NovaSeq 6000 solid tumor panel. RESULTS: From May 2021 to November 2022, 14 patients were enrolled, at which point the trial was closed due to termination of all infigratinib oncology trials. Two patients (14.3%) had treatment-terminating toxicities, well below the stopping threshold. Responses occurred in 6 (66.7%) of 9 patients with FGFR3 alterations. Responders had median tumor size reduction of 67%, with 3 of 5 patients initially planned for nephroureterectomy/ureterectomy converted to ureteroscopy. Median follow-up in responders was 24.7 months (14.9-28.9). CONCLUSIONS: In this first trial of targeted therapy for localized UTUC, FGFR inhibition was well tolerated and had significant activity in FGFR3 altered tumors. Renal preservation was enabled in a substantial proportion of participants. These data support the design of a biomarker-driven phase 2 trial of FGFR3 inhibition in this population with significant unmet clinical needs.

Safety and efficacy of radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy for recurrent metastatic renal pelvic and ureteral carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively investigate the safety and efficacy of radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy for recurrent metastatic renal pelvic and ureteral carcinoma. METHODS: 109 patients were enrolled in this study, including 44 patients in the radiochemotherapy group and 65 patients in the chemotherapy group. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance the baseline characteristics of the two groups by 1:1 matching. Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate PFS and OS. Cox regression model was used for multivariate analysis. The side effects were evaluated by CTCAE v5.0 RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 14.5 months. Multivariate analysis showed that radiotherapy was a good independent prognostic factor for OS (HR: 0.327, 95% CI 0.157-0.680, P = 0.003). After matching, there were 40 patients in both groups, and the median PFS and OS in the radiochemotherapy group were longer than those in the chemotherapy group (PFS: 10.4 vs. 6.7 months, P = 0.035; OS: 43.5 vs. 18.8 months, P < 0.001). In addition, in the radiochemotherapy group, patients treated with radiotherapy before first-line chemotherapy failure had a longer PFS than those treated with radiotherapy after chemotherapy failure (median PFS: 15.7 vs. 6 months, P = 0.003). There was no significant difference in the incidence of grade 3-4 toxicities between the two groups (52.3% vs. 50.8%, P = 0.878). CONCLUSION: For patients with recurrent metastatic renal pelvic and ureteral carcinoma, radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy is well tolerable and expected to bring long-term survival benefits, and the benefits of early interventional radiotherapy may be more obvious.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy after Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma with Variant Histology: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survival Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to determine effects of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) on survival outcomes compared to surgery alone without AC for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) patients with variant histology (VH). METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies investigating AC for UTUC in Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library up to January 2023. Population, intervention, comparator, and outcome were UTUC patients with VH, radical nephroureterectomy with AC, radical nephroureterectomy only, and oncological survival, respectively. RESULTS: Four retrospective studies were included. Regarding overall survival (OS), the pooled hazard ratio was 0.61 (95% confidence interval: 0.42-0.87; p = 0.007) across two studies. Regarding cancer-specific survival (CSS), the pooled hazard ratio was 0.46 (95% confidence interval: 0.25-0.84; p = 0.01) across three studies. All included studies had a high quality based on the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Certainty of evidence for OS was low. Certainty of evidence for CSS was moderate due to a strong association (hazard ratio <0.5). Publication bias was not significant for any studies. CONCLUSION: In UTUC patients with VH, administration of AC after surgery might have better survival outcomes than surgery alone. Our study provides evidence for decision-making of clinicians who treat UTUC patients with VH.

Efficacy and Safety of Mitomycin Gel (UGN-101) as an Adjuvant Therapy After Complete Endoscopic Management of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.

PURPOSE: We describe a novel application of the reverse thermal polymer gel of mitomycin C (UGN-101) as adjuvant therapy after complete endoscopic ablation of upper tract urothelial carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients treated with UGN-101 from 15 high-volume centers. Adjuvant therapy was defined as treatment administered following visually complete endoscopic ablation. Response at primary endoscopic evaluation was defined as no visual tumor or negative biopsy. Ipsilateral disease-free and progression-free survival were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Ureteral stenosis and other adverse events were abstracted from the medical records. Ureteral stenosis was defined as a condition requiring ureteral stent or nephrostomy, or that would typically warrant stent or nephrostomy. RESULTS: Adjuvant UGN-101 after complete endoscopic ablation was used in 52 of 115 (45%) renal units in the oncologic analysis. At first endoscopic evaluation, 36/52 (69%) were without visible disease. At 6.8 months' median follow-up, the ipsilateral disease-free rate was 63%. Recurrence after adjuvant UGN-101 therapy was more likely in multifocal tumors compared to unifocal (HR 3.3, 95% CI 1.07-9.91). Compared with UGN-101 treatment for chemoablation of measurable disease, there were significantly fewer disease detections with adjuvant therapy (P < .001). Ureteral stenosis after UGN-101 was diagnosed in 10 patients (19%) undergoing adjuvant therapy compared to 17 (29%) undergoing chemoablative therapy (P = .28). CONCLUSIONS: In patients being considered for UGN-101, maximal endoscopic ablation prior to UGN-101 treatment may result in fewer patients with disease at first endoscopy and possibly fewer adverse events than primary chemoablative therapy. Longer follow-up is needed to determine if UGN-101 after complete endoscopic ablation will lead to durable disease-free interval.

Antegrade administration of mitomycin gel for upper tract urothelial carcinoma via percutaneous nephrostomy tube: a multi-institutional retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the safety profile of antegrade mitomycin gel instillation through a percutaneous nephrostomy tube (PCNT) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) with the aim of decreasing morbidity associated with therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing antegrade administration of mitomycin gel via PCNT were retrospectively included for analysis from four tertiary referral centres between 2020 and 2022. The primary outcome was safety profile, as graded by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (v5.0). Post-therapy disease burden was assessed by primary disease evaluation (PDE) via ureteroscopy. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients received at least one dose of mitomycin gel via PCNT for UTUC, 29 of whom completed induction and underwent PDE. Thirteen patients (41%) had residual tumour present prior to induction therapy. At a median of 15.0 months following first dose of induction therapy, ureteric stenosis occurred in three patients (9%), all of whom were treated without later recurrence or chronic stenosis. Other adverse events included fatigue (27%), flank pain (19%), urinary tract infection (12%), sepsis (8%) and haematuria (8%). No patients had impaired renal function during follow-up and there were no treatment-related deaths. Seventeen patients (59%) had no evidence of disease at PDE and have not experienced recurrence at a median follow-up of 13.0 months post induction. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of mitomycin gel via a PCNT offers a low rate of ureteric stenosis, demonstrates a favourable safety profile, and is administered without general anaesthesia.

The role of perioperative chemotherapy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy.

PURPOSE: To summarize evidence regarding the use of neoadjuvant (NAC) and adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) among patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). METHODS: A comprehensive literature search of PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE and the Cochrane library was performed to identify any original or review article on the role of perioperative chemotherapy for UTUC patients treated with RNU. RESULTS: With regards to NAC, retrospective studies consistently suggested that it may be associated with better pathological downstaging (pDS) ranging from 10.8 to 80% and complete response (pCR) ranging from 4.3 to 15%, while decreasing the risk of recurrence and death as compared to RNU alone. Even higher pDS ranging from 58 to 75% and pCR ranging from 14 to 38% were observed in single-arm phase II trials. With regards to AC, retrospective studies provided conflicting results although the largest report from the National Cancer Database suggested an overall survival benefit in pT3-T4 and/or pN + patients. In addition, a phase III randomized controlled trial showed that the use of AC was associated with a disease-free survival benefit (HR = 0.45; 95% CI = [0.30-0.68]; p = 0.0001) in pT2-T4 and/or pN + patients with acceptable toxicity profile. This benefit was consistent in all subgroups analyzed. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative chemotherapy improves oncological outcomes associated with RNU. Given the impact of RNU on renal function, the rational is stronger for the use of NAC which impacts final pathology and potentially prolongs survival. However, the level of evidence is stronger for the use of AC that has been proven to decrease the risk of recurrence after RNU with a potential survival benefit.

Design and rationale of a single-arm phase II study of neoadjuvant Durvalumab and Gemcitabine associated with Cisplatin or Carboplatin for upper urinary tract urothelial cancer: the iNDUCT trial (NCT04617756).

BACKGROUND: Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is often locally advanced at initial diagnosis and is associated with high recurrence and mortality rates after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy has shown a recurrence-free survival benefit in a randomised phase III trial, while neoadjuvant treatment seems promising in retrospective series. On the contrary, little is known about the role of perioperative immunotherapy and its combination with chemotherapy for UTUC patients, although initial positive results have been published for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. STUDY DESIGN AND ENDPOINTS: Against this backdrop, we are running a multi-centre single-arm phase 2 trial of neoadjuvant Durvalumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting programmed cell death ligand 1, combined with Gemcitabine and Cisplatin or Carboplatin for high-risk UTUC patients. The primary outcome is pathological complete response rate at RNU. Secondary endpoints include the partial pathological response rate, safety, as well as disease-free and overall survival. A biomarker analysis is also planned. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS: Included patients must have a good performance status and harbour a non-metastatic UTUC, considered at high risk of progression, defined as either biopsy-proven high-grade disease or invasive features at imaging with or, more recently, without high-grade cytology at the multidisciplinary team discretion, as specified in the latest amendment. Enrolled patients receive 3 cycles of neoadjuvant immuno-chemotherapy before RNU, and the standard of care thereafter. The trial is registered as NCT04617756 and is supervised by an independent data monitoring committee.

Comparison of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma in real-world practice: a multicenter retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Multiple studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma compared with surgery alone. However, no clinical trial has established the superiority of neoadjuvant chemotherapy or adjuvant chemotherapy in terms of perioperative outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis encompassing 164 upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients who underwent radical nephroureterectomy and received perioperative chemotherapy. Of these patients, 65 (39.6%) and 99 (60.4%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy, respectively. Recurrence-free survival and cancer-specific survival were computed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Additionally, we conducted Cox regression analyses to evaluate the risk factors for recurrence-free survival and cancer-specific survival. RESULTS: Pathological downstaging was seen in 37% of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group. However, no pathological complete response was observed in this cohort. The Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated significantly lower recurrence-free survival and cancer-specific survival in patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy exhibited a marked association with inferior recurrence-free survival and cancer-specific survival. CONCLUSION: Our study has suggested that neoadjuvant chemotherapy would be more effective in high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients compared with adjuvant chemotherapy.

Prognostic nomogram for overall survival in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) patients treated with chemotherapy: a SEER-based retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To establish a prognostic nomogram among UTUC patients who received chemotherapy. METHODS: 1195 UTUC patients who received chemotherapy were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database for the period between 2004 and 2015. Patients were randomly divided into a training and a validation set. Nomogram was constructed to predict 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) in those patients. Receiver-operating characteristic curves (ROCs), calibration plots, and Decision curve analysis (DCA) were applied to assess and compare the discrimination, accuracy, and practicability of the nomogram with 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) tumor node metastasis (TNM) staging system. RESULTS: Six clinical parameters were identified as independent prognostic factors for UTUC patients' OS, including age, marital status, TNM stage, and surgical methods of the primary site. The ROC curves showed a satisfactory discrimination capacity of the nomogram, with 1-, 3-, and 5-year area under curve (AUC) values of 0.789, 0.772, and 0.763 in the training set and 0.772, 0.822, and 0.814 in the validation set, respectively. Calibration curves indicated a good agreement between actual observation and nomogram prediction. ROC and DCA curves showed our nomograms exhibited larger benefits than the 8th AJCC-TNM staging system. CONCLUSIONS: A prognostic nomogram was established and validated to present individual predictions of OS among chemotherapeutic UTUC patients. This nomogram may assist clinicians in accurate survival prognostication, treatment decision-making, and design of future clinical trials.

Successful Kidney-Sparing Systemic Therapy for a High-Risk Ureteral Carcinoma Case.

Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) refers to the malignancies located from renal calices toward the end of the ureter and could be classified as renal pelvis carcinoma and ureteral carcinoma. For high-risk UTUC cases with a normal contralateral kidney, radical nephroureterectomy is the standard treatment. As for low-risk UTUC cases or solitary kidney cases, kidney-sparing therapy may be a better choice. Besides, to prevent postoperative recurrence, systemic therapy should be applied, though the investigation is still ongoing. In this case report, we reported a rare case diagnosed with high-risk ureteral carcinoma, but he underwent kidney-sparing therapy due to chronic kidney disease. Recurrence has occurred after segmental ureterectomy. But through the utilization of ablation, bladder instillation, and tislelizumab, endoscopy and CT were normal in the follow-up (the patient refused to take washings from the upper urinary tract) for more than a year. In all, the utilization of ureteroscopic retrograde tumor ablation, BCG bladder instillation, and tislelizumab injection to treat high-risk ureteral carcinoma for kidney-sparing therapy have filled in the gap in this field, which should be promoted to help more patients in similar situations.

[Preoperative chemotherapy for patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma: Impact on renal function]. / Chimiothérapie préopératoire des tumeurs des voies excrétrices supérieures : impact sur la fonction rénale.

PURPOSE: Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) are rare tumors with a poor prognosis. The standard treatment for localized disease is based on total nephroureterectomy (NUT) followed by platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy for eligible patients at risk of recurrence. However, many patients have renal failure after surgery preventing chemotherapy. Thus, the place of preoperative chemotherapy (POC) is questioned with little information available about renal toxicity and efficacity. METHODS: A single center retrospective study was performed on patients with UTUC who received POC. RESULTS: In all, 24 patients with localized UTUC were treated with POC between 2013 and 2022. Twenty-one (91%) had secondarily NUT. In this cohort, POC did not result in degradation of median renal function (pre-POC median GFR: 70mL/min, post-POC median GFR: 77mL/min, P=0.79), unlike NUT (post-NUT median GFR: 51.5mL/min, P<0.001). In addition, the rate of complete pathological response to pathological examination was 29%. After a median follow-up of 27.4 months, the overall survival rate was 74% and the recurrence-free survival rate was 46%. CONCLUSION: POC for UTUC shows a very reassuring renal toxicity profile and encouraging histological results. These data encourage prospective studies assessing its place for UTUC management.

Antegrade Instillation of UGN-101 (Mitomycin for Pyelocalyceal Solution) for Low-Grade Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Initial Clinical Experience.

PURPOSE: UGN-101 (mitomycin for pyelocalyceal solution) is a recently approved chemoablative treatment for low-grade (LG) upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). While approved for retrograde or antegrade administration, previous reports discuss only patients treated by retrograde approach. We report our techniques for antegrade administration along with early outcomes from our cohort of patients who have undergone UGN-101 administration via nephrostomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: UGN-101 is administered as 6 weekly instillations in patients who have undergone endoscopic ablation of LG UTUC. We outline our approach in patients thought to have LG UTUC from initial ureteroscopy to nephrostomy placement, UGN-101 administration and eventual nephrostomy removal. We discuss early durability of response along with adverse events with special attention to ureteral strictures. RESULTS: Eight patients underwent antegrade UGN-101 administration during the study period, all of whom underwent followup ureteroscopy with complete response in 4 patients. Three patients reported 5 adverse events-3 grade 1, 1 grade 2 requiring 1 week delay of treatment and 1 asymptomatic ureteral stricture. Median followup was 7 months. CONCLUSIONS: We outline our approach for antegrade administration of UGN-101 and discuss early results along with adverse events. Future studies should evaluate our method's potential to increase patient comfort, improve logistics and decrease risk of adverse events.

Drug instillation in the management of urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This article aimed to investigate the efficacy of drug instillation therapy in preventing the recurrence of postsurgical upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) by reviewing recently published research articles. RECENT FINDINGS: Several clinical trials have shown new potential forms of postsurgical intracavitary and intravesical drug instillation methodologies with better efficacy and less toxicity for use in UTUC. With the improvement of endoscopic imaging techniques and laser sciences, diverse attempts in drug instillation have shown an improved recurrence rate after kidney-sparing surgery in low-grade, low-tumor burden cancers in the upper urinary tract. A gel-form type of mitomycin-C in intracavitary instillation further reduced recurrence rates in UTUC. Other studies have compared different drug instillation methodologies with varying initiation times and timed instillation. They have shown that early instillation with multiple rounds resulted in better protective effects for recurrence rates before, during, and after surgery. SUMMARY: A new gel-form of intracavitary instillation of mitomycin-C, the timing of drug instillation, and refining techniques can result in better recurrence-free survival of patients with UTUC after surgery. Further large-scale prospective clinical trials are needed to validate these new forms of drugs and methodologies to change the therapeutic guidelines of UTUC.

[A Case of Metastatic Ureteral Cancer Treated with Pembrolizumab without Relapse of Ocular Myasthenia Gravis].

A 77-year-old man complaining of gross hematuria was referred to our hospital for further examination and treatment. The contrast-enhanced computed tomographic (CT) scan revealed a left ureteral tumor, multiple bladder tumors, para-aortic lymph node metastasis, left supraclavicular lymph node metastasis, multiple liver metastases, and multiple lung metastases. Transurethral resection was performed. One of the multiple bladder tumors, located at the bladder neck, was pathologically diagnosed as urothelial carcinoma, pT1, high grade, G2．We diagnosed the patient with metastatic ureteral cancer (T4N2M1, stage IV). We stated gemcitabine, cisplatin (GC) therapy, but stopped after the first course due to gemcitabine drug eruption. We changed the regimen to methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC) therapy and the cycle was completed without complications. However, CT scan showed disease progression. After palliative irradiation of the primary lesion, we administered pembrolizumab. Although he was asymptomatic, we diagnosed him with ocular myasthenia gravis because of a high level of serum anti-acetylcholine receptor antibodies and a temporary ptosis in his past history. In spite of the possibility of relapse of myasthenia gravis, treatment with pembrolizumab was continued with his consent since there were no other treatment options. After two courses of pembrolizumab, he was hospitalized due to disease progression and died about three weeks after admission. Myasthenia gravis is a possible immune-related adverse event of pembrolizumab, However, there have been few reports on the successful treatment with this agent in patients with previously diagnosed myasthenia gravis. We report, here, a case of metastatic ureteral carcinoma safely treated with pembrolizumab without relapse of ocular myasthenia gravis.

First Report of Oncological Outcome and Prognostic Analysis in a First-Line Setting of Short Hydration Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Chemotherapy for Patients with Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to examine the effectiveness of a modified-short hydration gemcitabine and cisplatin (m-shGC) regimen for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) and to assess the efficacy of a geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) with regard to prognosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2016 to July 2020, 68 patients with mUC underwent first-line m-shGC therapy with 70 mg/m2 cisplatin and 1,000 mg/m2 gemcitabine (days 1, 8, and 15), with 2,050 mL fluid replaced on the first day of each 28-day cycle. Prior to the start of treatment, the serum neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and levels of albumin and C-reactive protein (CRP) in serum, as well as body heights and weights were measured. Patients were grouped according to GNRI <92 (low) or ≥92 (high). The analysis of data was done retrospectively. RESULTS: Median follow-up was found to be 12.9 (range 1.7-50.2) months and the objective response rate (ORR) was 54.4% after m-shGC treatment. The ORR was significantly different when high and low-GNRI groups were compared (ORR: 28.0 vs. 69.8% in low- vs. high-GNRI groups). Median overall survival (OS) was calculated as 8.6 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.4-21.3) and 34.5 (95% CI: 20.5-NA) months for low- and high-GNRI groups, respectively (p < 0.0001). Unlike for NLR and CRP, univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that low GNRI and visceral metastases were significant prognostic factors for short OS. CONCLUSIONS: First-line m-shGC showed a survival benefit for mUC, with GNRI a useful prognostic biomarker.

Trends in the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and oncological outcomes for high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a multicentre retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate temporal trends in neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) utilisation and outcomes in patients with locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included 289 patients from seven hospitals who underwent radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for locally advanced UTUC (≥cT3 or cN+) between 2000 and 2020. These patients received RNU alone or two to four courses of NAC with either a cisplatin- or carboplatin-based regimen. We evaluated the temporal changes in NAC use and compared the visceral recurrence-free, cancer-specific, and overall survival rates. The effect of NAC on oncological outcomes was examined using multivariate Cox regression analysis with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) models. RESULTS: Of 289 patients, 144 underwent NAC followed by RNU (NAC group) and 145 underwent RNU alone (Control [Ctrl] group). NAC use increased significantly from 19% (2006-2010), 58% (2011-2015), to 79% (2016-2020). Pathological downstaging was significantly higher in the NAC group than in the Ctrl group. The IPTW-adjusted multivariable analyses showed that NAC significantly improved the oncological outcomes in the NAC group compared with the Ctrl group. Moreover, carboplatin-based NAC significantly improved the oncological outcomes in the NAC group compared with the Ctrl group among patients with chronic kidney disease Stage ≥3. There were no significant differences in oncological outcomes between the cisplatin- and carboplatin-based regimens. CONCLUSIONS: The use of NAC for high-risk UTUC increased significantly after 2010. Platinum-based short-term NAC followed by immediate RNU may not impede and potentially improves oncological outcomes.

Immune checkpoint inhibition in upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Immunotherapy is changing the way we think about and treat urothelial carcinoma (UC). The PD-1/PD-L1 pathway inhibition has shown robust efficacy, associated with an acceptable toxicity profile, in patients with locally advanced and metastatic unresectable disease, addressing a high decades-old unmet medical need. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Using the Pubmed database, we conducted a literature review for English written published articles up to June 2020. The highest available evidence for the immunotherapy treatment of UC with ICIs were evaluated. The leading phase one, two and three clinical trials were considered for inclusion (n = 12). Patient's data were extracted from studies depicting the UTUC subpopulation. RESULTS: Two monoclonal antibodies targeting PD-1 (pembrolizumab and nivolumab) and three to its ligand PD-L1 (atezolizumab, avelumab, and durvalumab) have obtained US FDA and EMA approval for the second-line treatment of platinum-pretreated patients, between 2016 and 2019. Atezolizumab and Pembrolizumab are even currently approved in the first-line setting for cisplatin ineligible patients, with PD-L1- positive tumor. The neoadjuvant scenario in localized high-risk disease is still evolving, with the first data available to date limited to the muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma. The management of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC: renal pelvis and ureters) is complicated by the lack of specific high-level evidence, due to the rarity of the disease. No published studies addressing immunotherapy in UTUC patients only are available. The largest clinical trials aimed at UC patients, regardless of the upper or lower location of the primary tumor, have enrolled a minority of patients with UTUC, providing the data on which our current knowledge is based. However, targeted scientific efforts are needed to improve our level of care. CONCLUSIONS: This review summarizes the main currently available evidence on the use of the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway inhibition with reference to patients presenting with UTUC.

Adjuvant chemotherapy improves overall survival in patients with localized upper tract urothelial carcinoma harboring pathologic vascular invasion: a propensity score-matched analysis of multi-institutional cohort.

OBJECTIVE: Whether adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) for patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) offers survival benefit is still controversial. To explore the impact of AC on overall survival (OS) of cN0M0 UTUC patients, we conducted a propensity score-matched analysis using the regression model, including pathologic features such as lymphatic and vascular invasion. METHODS: A multi-institutional cohort of 413 UTUC patient record was used. Propensity score matching was performed to reduce bias by potential confounding factors for survival, including pathologic features from the specimen of radical nephroureterectomy (RNU), RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients were identified as pair-matched groups (49 patients in RNU and 49 patients in RNU + AC). Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated that a 5-year OS rate of 72.7% for patients treated with RNU + AC was significantly higher than 51.6% for those treated with RNU (p = 0.0156). On multivariate analysis, pathologic vascular invasion (HR 3.41, 95% CI 1.24-10.66, p = 0.0166) and administration of AC (HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.19-0.98, p = 0.0438) still remained as the significant predictors for OS. In patients with pathologic vascular invasion (51 of 98 patients), a significantly longer OS in RNU + AC groups was observed (median OS of 30 and 70 months in RNU and RNU + AC groups, respectively: p = 0.0432), whereas there was no significant difference in the OS between RNU (median OS: not reached) and RNU + AC (median OS: not reached) groups in patients without the invasion (p = 0.4549). CONCLUSION: The result indicates a significant benefit for OS by the administration of AC, and pathologic vascular invasion in the specimen of RNU could help the patient selection to better predict the effect of AC.

Outcomes of upper tract urothelial carcinoma with isolated lymph node involvement following surgical resection: implications for multi-modal management.

BACKGROUND: There are limited data on the oncologic outcomes of upper tract urothelial carcinoma with isolated lymph node (LN) involvement (pN+ M0) following surgical resection. We examined pN+ M0 UTUC in a large, nationwide oncology dataset to characterize its natural history, describe trends in utilization of perioperative chemotherapy, and identify clinicopathologic features associated with survival. METHODS: We identified 794 patients aged 18-89 years who underwent radical nephroureterectomy with lymph node dissection for pN+ M0 UTUC from 2006 to 2013 in the National Cancer Database. The associations of clinicopathologic features with overall survival (OS) were evaluated using Cox regression models, and a simplified risk score was created. RESULTS: Median follow-up among survivors was 39.5 months, during which time 555 (70%) patients died. Over the study period, neoadjuvant chemotherapy utilization increased from 6.7 to 14.2% (p = 0.002), while adjuvant chemotherapy utilization remained stable (42.7 to 44.3%; p = 0.86). One-, 5-, and 8-year OS rates were 63.7%, 24.2%, and 18.7%, respectively. On multivariable analysis, older age, larger tumor size, higher pT stage, positive surgical margins, number of positive LNs, and non-receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy were independently associated with worse OS. A simplified risk score consisting of age, tumor size, pT stage, number of positive LNs, and margin status was created with predicted 5-year OS ranging from 12 to 44%. CONCLUSIONS: In this large, contemporary cohort, pN+ M0 UTUC was associated with a 5-year OS of only 24%. Clinicopathologic predictors of survival after surgical resection may improve risk-stratification, counseling, and selection of patients for multimodal management.

Single-dose intravesical chemotherapy after nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Single-dose, postoperative intravesical chemotherapy reduces the risk of bladder cancer recurrence after transurethral resection of bladder tumours. However, there is limited evidence whether single-dose intravesical chemotherapy is similarly effective at preventing bladder cancer recurrence after nephroureterectomy. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of single-dose intravesical chemotherapy instillation after nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. SEARCH METHODS: We performed a comprehensive literature search using multiple databases (MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and LILACS), trials registries, other sources of grey literature, and conference proceedings published up to April 15 2019, with no restrictions on language or status of publication. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials in which participants either received or did not receive single-dose intravesical chemotherapy instillation after nephroureterectomy. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors screened and independently assessed studies and extracted data from included studies. We performed statistical analyses using a random-effects model. We rated the certainty of evidence according to the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS: The search identified two studies (a multicenter study from Japan and the United Kingdom) with 361 participants.Primary outcomesOur results indicate that single-dose intravesical chemotherapy instillation may reduce the risk of bladder cancer recurrence over time compared to no instillation (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.32 to 0.82, low-certainty evidence). After 12 months follow-up, this would result in 127 fewer bladder cancer recurrences (95% CI: 182 to 44 fewer bladder cancer recurrences) per 1000 participants. We downgraded the certainty of evidence by two levels due to study limitations and imprecision.We found no trials that reported on the outcomes of time to death from upper tract urothelial carcinoma. The effect of single-dose intravesical chemotherapy instillation on serious adverse events is uncertain (risk ratio [RR]: not estimable, 95% CI: not estimable, there were no events, very low-certainty evidence). We downgraded the certainty of evidence by one level due to study limitations and by two levels due to imprecision.Secondary outcomesWe found no trials that reported on the outcomes of time to death from any cause and participants' disease-specific quality of life. The effect of single-dose intravesical chemotherapy instillation on minor adverse events is uncertain (risk ratio [RR]: not estimable, 95% CI: not estimable, there were no events, very low-certainty evidence). We downgraded the certainty of evidence by one level due to study limitations and by two levels due to imprecision. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: For patients who have undergone nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma, single-dose intravesical chemotherapy instillation may reduce bladder cancer recurrence after nephroureterectomy. However, we are uncertain as to the risk of serious (and minor) adverse events. We found no evidence for the outcome of time to death from upper tract urothelial carcinoma. We were unable to conduct any of the preplanned subgroup analyses, particularly those based on operative approach, pathologic stage, and method of bladder cuff excision.