Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 112
Filter
1.
Cancer Causes Control ; 35(6): 935-942, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38368574

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: High-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) detection in self-collected urine samples (SeCUS) may be a promising alternative for cervical cancer screening because of its greater acceptability, as long as it can offer comparable sensitivity to clinician-collected cervical samples (CCoS) for detecting precancer lesions. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of the SeCUS compared to that of the CCoS for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3) detection among hrHPV-positive women receiving colposcopy in Mexico City using different specific extended HPV typing procedures: HPV16/18, HPV16/18/35/39/68 or HPV16/18/35/39/68/31. METHODS: From March 2017 to August 2018, 4,158 female users of the cervical cancer screening program at Tlalpan Sanitary Jurisdiction in Mexico City were invited to participate in the FRIDA-Tlalpan study. All participants provided ≥ 30 mL of SeCUS, and then a CCoS was obtained with Cervex-Brush®, which was used for hrHPV typing. Participants who tested positive for hrHPV in CCoS were referred for colposcopy for diagnostic confirmation, and all SeCUS of these women were also tested for hrHPV typing. RESULTS: In total, 561 hrHPV-positive women were identified by CCoS via colposcopy, and 82.2% of the SeCUS of these women were also hrHPV positive. From both CCoS and SeCUS, 7 cases of CIN3 were detected. Considering HPV16/18 typing, CCoS and SeCUS detected 4 cases of CIN3, but after HPV16/18/35/39/68/31 extension typing, both CCoS and SeCUS detected all 7 of the CIN3 cases among the hrHPV-positive women. CONCLUSIONS: Using extended hrHPV typing based on HPV16/18/35/39/68/31, our results suggest that the performance of SeCUS may be equivalent to that of CCoS for detecting CIN3 lesions. Although our results are inconclusive, they support the hypothesis that SeCUS may be an attractive alternative worthy of further research.


Subject(s)
Colposcopy , Early Detection of Cancer , Papillomavirus Infections , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Papillomavirus Infections/urine , Mexico/epidemiology , Adult , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/urine , Middle Aged , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/virology , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/urine , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/epidemiology , Precancerous Conditions/virology , Precancerous Conditions/diagnosis , Precancerous Conditions/urine , Papillomaviridae/isolation & purification , Papillomaviridae/genetics
2.
Gynecol Oncol ; 162(3): 575-583, 2021 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34172287

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Urine self-sampling has gained increasing interest for cervical cancer screening. In contrast to analytical performance, little information is available regarding the clinical accuracy for high-risk Human Papillomavirus (hrHPV) testing on urine. METHODS: VALHUDES is a diagnostic test accuracy study comparing clinical accuracy to detect high-grade cervical precancer (CIN2+) of HPV testing on self-collected compared to clinician-collected samples (NCT03064087). Disease outcome was assessed by colposcopy and histology. The Abbott RealTime High Risk HPV assay performance was evaluated on Colli-Pee collected first-void urine with cervical outcomes as comparator. RESULTS: As no assay cut-off for urine has been clinically validated, we used the predefined cut-off for cervical samples (CN ≤ 32). Using this cut-off, hrHPV testing was similarly sensitive (relative sensitivity 0.95; 95% CI: 0.88-1.01) and specific (relative specificity 1.03; 95% CI: 0.95-1.13) for detection of CIN2+ compared to testing cervical samples. In the subgroup of women of 30 years and older, similar relative sensitivity (0.97; 95% CI: 0.89-1.05) and specificity (1.02; 95% CI: 0.93-1.12) was found. Additionally, an exploratory cut-off (CN ≤ 33.86) was defined which further improved sensitivity and analytical test performance. CONCLUSION: HrHPV-DNA based PCR testing on home-collected first-void urine has similar accuracy for detecting CIN2+ compared to cervical samples taken by a clinician.


Subject(s)
Papillomaviridae/isolation & purification , Papillomavirus Infections/urine , Adult , Aged , Cervix Uteri/pathology , Cervix Uteri/virology , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Urine/virology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/urine , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology , Young Adult , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/urine , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/virology
3.
Gynecol Oncol ; 156(3): 641-646, 2020 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31926639

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether HPV DNA in urine has potential advantages as an alternative biomarker for HPV-based cervical cancer screening. METHODS: Among patients with Cobas HPV test results, a total of 67 HPV-positive (n = 42) and -negative (n = 25) women who agreed to participate in this study were willing to provide paired cervical and urine samples, and we observed concordance between sample types from each patient in identifying HPV genotypes using the nanowire assay. RESULTS: We detected high-risk strains of HPV DNA in unprocessed urine specimens using polyethyleneimine-conjugated nanowires (PEI-NWs). Concordance for high-risk HPV (hrHPV) between paired urine and cervical samples was 90.4% (κ = 0.90; 95% CI: 0.80-100.00). The virological sensitivity and specificity for detection of HPV DNA from a small urine sample (200 µL) were 81.3% (κ = 0.83; 95% CI: 62.1-100.0) and 98.0% (κ = 0.83; 95% CI: 94.2-100.0) for HPV16 group, 100.0% (κ = 0.65; 95% CI: 100.0-100.0) and 95.3% (κ = 0.65; 95% CI: 90.1-100.0) for HPV18 group, and 96.4% (κ = 0.97; 95% CI: 89.6-100.0) and 100.0% (κ = 0.97; 95% CI: 100.0-100.0) for other hrHPV group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The nanowire assay demonstrated excellent ability to identify HPV DNA from urine specimens. We observed an excellent agreement in the detection of high-risk HPV between paired urine and cervical samples, even with small urine sample volume.


Subject(s)
DNA, Viral/urine , Papillomaviridae/genetics , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Biomarkers, Tumor/urine , Cell-Free Nucleic Acids/urine , Cytodiagnosis/instrumentation , Cytodiagnosis/methods , DNA, Viral/genetics , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Female , Human papillomavirus 16/genetics , Human papillomavirus 16/isolation & purification , Human papillomavirus 18/genetics , Human papillomavirus 18/isolation & purification , Humans , Nanowires , Papillomaviridae/isolation & purification , Papillomavirus Infections/urine , Polyethyleneimine , Spectrophotometry, Ultraviolet , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/urine
4.
BMC Infect Dis ; 20(1): 926, 2020 Dec 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33276740

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To reach non-participants, reluctant to undergo clinician-based cervical cancer screening and vaginal self-sampling, urine collection for high-risk human papillomavirus detection (hrHPV) may be valuable. Using two hrHPV DNA assays, we evaluated the concordance of hrHPV positivity in urine samples in comparison with vaginal self-samples and cervical cytology samples taken by the general practitioner (GP). We also studied women's acceptance of urine collection and preferences towards the different sampling procedures. METHODS: One hundred fifty paired self-collected urine and vaginal samples and GP-collected cervical cytology samples were obtained from 30 to 59-year-old women diagnosed with ASC-US within the Danish cervical cancer screening program. After undergoing cervical cytology at the GP, the women collected first-void urine and vaginal samples at home and completed a questionnaire. Each sample was hrHPV DNA tested by the GENOMICA CLART® and COBAS® 4800 assays. Concordance in hrHPV detection between sample types was determined using Kappa (k) statistics. Sensitivity and specificity of hrHPV detection in urine was calculated using cervical sampling as reference. RESULTS: With the COBAS assay, urine showed good concordance to the vaginal (k = 0.66) self-samples and cervical samples (k = 0.66) for hrHPV detection. The corresponding concordance was moderate (k = 0.59 and k = 0.47) using CLART. Compared to cervical sampling, urinary hrHPV detection had a sensitivity of 63.9% and a specificity of 96.5% using COBAS; compared with 51.6 and 92.4% for CLART. Invalid hrHPV test rates were 1.8% for COBAS and 26.9% for CLART. Urine collection was well-accepted and 42.3% of the women ranked it as the most preferred future screening procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Urine collection provides a well-accepted screening option. With COBAS, higher concordance between urine and vaginal self-sampling and cervical sampling for hrHPV detection was found compared to CLART. Urinary hrHPV detection with COBAS is feasible, but its accuracy may need to be improved before urine collection at home can be offered to non-participants reluctant to both cervical sampling and vaginal self-sampling.


Subject(s)
DNA, Viral/genetics , Mass Screening/methods , Papillomaviridae/genetics , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Urine Specimen Collection/methods , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Adult , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Papillomavirus Infections/urine , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Sensitivity and Specificity , Surveys and Questionnaires , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/urine , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology , Vagina/virology , Vaginal Smears/methods , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/urine , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/virology
5.
BJOG ; 124(9): 1356-1363, 2017 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28391609

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the sensitivity of high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) and genotype detection in self-collected urine samples in the morning (U1), and later on (U2), brush-based self-samples (SS), and clinician-taken smears (CTS) for detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2+ (CIN2+) in a colposcopic referral population. DESIGN: Cross-sectional single-centre study. SETTING: A colposcopy clinic in Spain. POPULATION: A cohort of 113 women referred for colposcopy after an abnormal Pap smear. METHODS: Women undergoing colposcopy with biopsy for abnormal Pap smears were sent a device (Colli-Pee™, Novosanis, Wijnegem, Belgium) to collect U1 on the morning of colposcopy. U2, CTS, and SS (Evalyn brush™, Rovers Medical Devices B.V., Oss, the Netherlands) were also analysed. All samples were tested for HPV DNA using the analytically sensitive SPF10-DEIA-LiPA25 assay and the clinically validated GP5+/6+-EIA-LMNX. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Histologically confirmed CIN2+ and hrHPV positivity for 14 high-risk HPV types. RESULTS: Samples from 91 patients were analysed. All CIN3 cases (n = 6) tested positive for hrHPV in CTS, SS, U1, and U2 with both HPV assays. Sensitivity for CIN2+ with the SPF10 system was 100, 100, 95, and 100%, respectively. With the GP5+/6+ assay, sensitivity was 95% in all sample types. The sensitivities and specificities for both tests on each of the sample types did not significantly differ. There was 10-14% discordance on hrHPV genotype. CONCLUSIONS: CIN2+ detection using HPV testing of U1 shows a sensitivity similar to that of CTS or brush-based SS, and is convenient. There was substantial to almost excellent agreement between all samples on genotype with both hrHPV assays. There was no advantage in testing U1 compared with U2 samples. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Similar CIN2+ sensitivity for HPV testing in first-void urine, physician-taken smear and brush-based self-sample.


Subject(s)
DNA, Viral/urine , Diagnostic Self Evaluation , Papanicolaou Test , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Vaginal Smears/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Biomarkers/urine , Colposcopy , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Papillomaviridae/genetics , Papillomaviridae/isolation & purification , Papillomavirus Infections/complications , Papillomavirus Infections/genetics , Papillomavirus Infections/urine , Prospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Triage , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/urine , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology , Young Adult , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/pathology , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/urine , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/virology
6.
Cancer ; 122(18): 2836-44, 2016 09 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27243771

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although urine-based testing for human papillomavirus (HPV) is being explored as a practical approach for cervical cancer screening, whether the results differ by age, race, or indicators of excess body weight or in populations exposed to HPV vaccines has not been documented by previous studies. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of urinary HPV testing for the presence of cervical HPVs and high-grade cervical intraepithelial lesions (grade 2 and 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia [CIN]) by the aforementioned population characteristics. METHODS: The study population consisted of 502 women diagnosed with different grades of CIN. HPV testing was performed with paired urine and cervical cell DNA with the Roche Diagnostics Linear Array test. Agreement coefficient 1 and probabilities were calculated to determine the accuracy of urinary HPV testing for the presence of cervical HPVs and CIN lesions. RESULTS: Substantial to almost perfect agreement (0.66-0.83) was observed in the detection of any HPV genotype in urine specimens versus cervical specimens, regardless of the population characteristics. Although the positive predictive value for the detection of CIN lesions was relatively low, the negative predictive value for CIN-3 was high (≥90%) among women positive for any of the urinary or cervical high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) genotypes or HPV genotypes not included in currently available HPV vaccines. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate that urinary HPV testing provides highly satisfactory results for excluding the possibility of any cervical HPV infections, including HPV types not included in vaccines and CIN lesions associated with any HR-HPV, regardless of a woman's age, race, or excess body weight. Cancer 2016. © 2016 American Cancer Society. Cancer 2016;122:2836-2844. © 2016 American Cancer Society.


Subject(s)
Papillomaviridae/isolation & purification , Papillomavirus Infections/urine , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/urine , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/virology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/urine , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology , Adult , Early Detection of Cancer , Female , Humans , Papillomaviridae/genetics , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/diagnosis
7.
J Infect Chemother ; 22(8): 559-62, 2016 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27342077

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Uterine cervical cancer is a treatable and preventable cancer. Medical efforts to reduce rates of cervical cancer focus on the promotion of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination and the promotion of routine cervical cancer screening done by cervical cytology and cervical HPV testing. Urine-based HPV testing would be simple and noninvasive approach to screen for cervical cancer. METHODS: Two biospecimens (clinician-taken sample from cervix and initial stream urine sample) were provided from a total of 240 healthy women attending for cancer screening provided for HPV testing. We have assessed the HPV detection rates among cervical samples and pellet fraction of urine samples using HPV test (Anyplex™ II HPV28 Detection kit, Seegene, Korea). RESULTS: Among 240 samples screened, HPV prevalence was 42.9% in pellet fractions of urine samples. The agreement between the two kinds of samples was 98.4%, k = 0.792. Discordant results were observed in 27 cases; 5 were positive only by urine samples and 22 were positive only by smear samples. Sensitivity and specificity for all HPV DNA in pellet fractions of urine using cervical samples as reference was 68.4% and 99.9%. CONCLUSIONS: Comparing methodologies of collection of samples for HPV detection, they showed the higher agreements for almost genotypes between cervical samples and pellet fractions of urine samples. These results suggest that urine could be a good noninvasive tool to monitor HPV infection in women. Additional research in a larger and general screening population would be needed.


Subject(s)
Cervix Uteri/virology , Papillomaviridae/isolation & purification , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Papillomavirus Infections/urine , Urine/virology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Adult , DNA, Viral/genetics , Early Detection of Cancer , Female , Genotype , Humans , Middle Aged , Papillomaviridae/genetics , Papillomaviridae/immunology , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Papillomavirus Vaccines/immunology , Republic of Korea , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/urine , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology , Vaginal Smears/methods , Young Adult
8.
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi ; 38(1): 35-9, 2016 Jan.
Article in Zh | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26796804

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the value of urine sediment analyzer in the screening of clinically suspected urinary tract infection (UTI) in cancer patients. METHODS: The results of bacterial count of 1 053 midstream urine samples by UF-1000i urine sediment analyzer (UF-1000i urine sediment analyzer, UF-1000i) were compared with the results of bacterial culture. Moreover, the results of distinguishing bacterial species by the bacterial scattergram were compared with the results of bacteria culture. At the same time, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of UF-1000i analyzer for UTI screening were evaluated. RESULTS: Of all the 1 053 samples, the top three bacteria were E. coli, Enterococci and P. aeruginosa. The top three malignant tumors of UTI were bladder, lung cancer and cervical cancers. The positive rate of UF-1000i analyzer was 20% (211/1 053), and that of bacteria culture was 17.9% (188/1 053). There was statistically no significant difference in the positive rates between the two methods (χ(2)=1.636, P>0.05), and the two methods had a considerable consistency (Kappa=0.756). Compared with the clinical diagnosis, UTI screening by UF-1000i analyzer showed a sensitivity of 79.6% (160/201), specificity of 95.5% (814/852), positive predictive value of 80.8% (160/198) and negative predictive value of 95.2%(814/855). The distribution of cocci and bacilli acquired by the bacterial scattergram was basically in accordance with the results of bacterial culture. CONCLUSIONS: Bacterial count by UF-1000i analyzer plays an important role in early screening of UTI, and the bacterial scattergram may help to distinguish bacterial species, providing reference for the use of antibiotics in early medication.


Subject(s)
Lung Neoplasms/urine , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/urine , Urinary Tract Infections/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/urine , Bacterial Load , Enterococcus/isolation & purification , Escherichia coli/isolation & purification , Female , Flow Cytometry , Humans , Leukocyte Count , Predictive Value of Tests , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/isolation & purification , Sensitivity and Specificity , Urinary Tract Infections/microbiology , Urinary Tract Infections/urine
9.
PLoS One ; 16(7): e0254946, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34288949

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Urine self-sampling for human papillomavirus (HPV)-based cervical cancer screening is a non-invasive method that offers several logistical advantages and high acceptability, reducing barriers related to low screening coverage. This study developed and evaluated the performance of a low-cost urine self-sampling method for HPV-testing and explored the acceptability and feasibility of potential implementation of this alternative in routine screening. METHODS: A series of sequential laboratory assays examined the impact of several pre-analytical conditions for obtaining DNA from urine and subsequent HPV detection. Initially, we assessed the effect of ethylaminediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) as a DNA preservative examining several variables including EDTA concentration, specimen storage temperature, time between urine collection and DNA extraction, and first-morning micturition versus convenience sample collection. We further evaluated the agreement of HPV-testing between urine and clinician-collected cervical samples among 95 women. Finally, we explored the costs of self-sampling supplies as well as the acceptability and feasibility of urine self-sampling among women and healthcare workers. RESULTS: Our results revealed higher DNA concentrations were obtained when using a 40mM EDTA solution, storing specimens at 25°C and extracting DNA within 72 hrs. of urine collection, regardless of using first-morning micturition or a convenience sampling. We observed good agreement (Kappa = 0.72) between urine and clinician-collected cervical samples for HPV detection. Furthermore, urine self-sampling was an affordable method (USD 1.10), well accepted among cervical cancer screening users, healthcare workers, and decision-makers. CONCLUSION: These results suggest urine self-sampling is feasible and appropriate alternative for HPV-testing in HPV-based screening programs in lower-resource contexts.


Subject(s)
Alphapapillomavirus , DNA, Viral , Early Detection of Cancer , Papillomavirus Infections , Urine Specimen Collection , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Adult , Alphapapillomavirus/genetics , Alphapapillomavirus/metabolism , Cervix Uteri/metabolism , Cervix Uteri/virology , DNA, Viral/genetics , DNA, Viral/urine , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Papillomavirus Infections/genetics , Papillomavirus Infections/urine , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/urine , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology
10.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 10323, 2021 05 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33990639

ABSTRACT

MicroRNAs as cancer biomarkers in serum, plasma, and other body fluids are often used but analysis of miRNA in urine is limited. We investigated the expression of selected miRNAs in the paired urine, serum, cervical scrape, and tumor tissue specimens from the women with cervical precancer and cancer with a view to identify if urine miRNAs could be used as reliable non-invasive biomarkers for an early diagnosis and prognosis of cervical cancer. Expression of three oncomiRs (miR-21, miR-199a, and miR-155-5p) and three tumor suppressors (miR-34a, miR-145, and miR-218) as selected by database search in cervical pre-cancer, cancer, and normal controls including cervical cancer cell lines were analyzed using qRT-PCR. The expression of miRNAs was correlated with various clinicopathological parameters, including HPV infection and survival outcome. We observed a significant overexpression of the oncomiRs and the downregulation of tumor suppressor miRNAs. A combination of miR-145-5p, miR-218-5p, and miR-34a-5p in urine yielded 100% sensitivity and 92.8% specificity in distinguishing precancer and cancer patients from healthy controls and it well correlates with those of serum and tumor tissues. The expression of miR-34a-5p and miR-218-5p were found to be independent prognostic factors for the overall survival of cervical cancer patients. We conclude that the evaluation of the above specific miRNA expression in non-invasive urine samples may serve as a reliable biomarker for early detection and prognosis of cervical cancer.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/urine , Circulating MicroRNA/urine , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Adult , Alphapapillomavirus/genetics , Alphapapillomavirus/isolation & purification , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Case-Control Studies , Cell Line, Tumor , Cervix Uteri/pathology , Cervix Uteri/virology , Circulating MicroRNA/metabolism , DNA, Viral/urine , Female , Gene Expression Profiling , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Liquid Biopsy/methods , Male , MicroRNAs/metabolism , MicroRNAs/urine , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Papillomavirus Infections/urine , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Prevalence , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/mortality , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/urine , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology
12.
Papillomavirus Res ; 9: 100193, 2020 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32171935

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Urine sampling is an interesting solution for CIN3 and cervical cancer detection. Urine can be separated in different fractions: full void urine, urine sediment and urine supernatant. We aimed to determine which urine fraction is most competent for CIN3 and cervical cancer detection by methylation analysis. METHODS: Urine samples (27 controls, 30 CIN3 and 17 cervical cancer) were processed into 3 fractions and tested for 5 methylation markers (ASCL1, GHSR, LHX8, SST, ZIC1). We determined Spearman correlation coefficients between fractions, compared methylation levels and calculated AUCs for CIN3 and cancer detection. RESULTS: In general strong correlations (r > 0.60) were found between urine fractions. Methylation levels increased significantly with severity of underlying disease in all urine fractions. CIN3 and controls differed significantly for 2 markers in full void urine, 4 markers in urine sediment and 1 marker in urine supernatant, with AUCs of 0.55-0.79. Comparison of cancer to controls was highly significant for all markers in all fractions, yielding AUCs of 0.87-0.99. CONCLUSION: Methylation analysis performs excellent in all urine fractions for cervical cancer detection. Our results indicate the potential of CIN3 detection by urinary methylation analysis, and demonstrate that urine sediment performs best to detect CIN3.


Subject(s)
DNA Methylation , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Papillomavirus Infections/urine , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biomarkers, Tumor , Cervix Uteri/pathology , Cervix Uteri/virology , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Female , Humans , Mass Screening/methods , Middle Aged , Statistics, Nonparametric , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/urine , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/urine
13.
J Obstet Gynaecol ; 29(7): 583-9, 2009 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19757259

ABSTRACT

Oncogenic types of human papilloma viruses (HPVs) have been established to be the causative agents for cervical cancers and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs). The clinical application of molecular tests for HPV detection for screening purposes has been of considerable interest. DNA amplification methods allow the use of self-collected samples (including urine) from material collected away from the original disease site. For screening of cervical pathology, detection of HPV-DNA in urine would be useful only if it represents cervical HPV infection and/or HPV-related cervical pathology. We conducted a review of the literature in order to ascertain: (1) if urine is an adequate sample for HPV-detection; (2) whether sensitive techniques are available for HPV-detection in urine and (3) if detection of HPV in urine truly represents cervical infection/pathology. The review process consisted of assembling facts and analysing the published literature on the following facts: anatomical considerations of the lower genital and the lower urinary tract, biological behaviour of HPV and its shedding behaviour, technical issues regarding sample collection, processing and HPV-DNA assay systems, concordance rates of HPV-DNA detection and their type specificity in the paired samples (urine and cervical scrapes) obtained in different clinico-epidemiological settings and comparative detection rates of HSILs in the paired samples.


Subject(s)
DNA, Viral/urine , Papillomaviridae/isolation & purification , Papillomavirus Infections/urine , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/urine , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/urine , Female , Humans , Mass Screening , Papillomaviridae/genetics , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Specimen Handling , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology , Vaginal Smears , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/virology
14.
Ginekol Pol ; 80(4): 256-62, 2009 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19507558

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to elaborate on the analytical method for quantitative determination of retinol and alpha-tocopherol in serum of women diagnosed with CIN and cervical cancer. The basic problem in the analysis of the vitamins content in biological material is their low physiological concentration level and instability. Liquid chromatography with diode array detector (DAD) was applied. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The material consisted of serum and urine collected from 12 women diagnosed with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and 16 diagnosed with cervical cancer. The method was evaluated for the following parameters: linearity, recovery, sensitivity, precision, accuracy, selectivity, stability, limit of quantification (LOQ) and limit of detection (LOD). RESULTS: Results showed good linearity (r2> or =0.99) in the range 0.1 microg/ml-10 mg/ml for retinol and 0.25 microg/ml-15 microg/ml for alpha-tocopherol. The Lower Limit of Detection was 0.15 microg/ml for vitamin E and 0.05 microg/ml for vitamin A. The within-run R.S.Ds were below 5.2% at all concentration levels and the between-run R.S.Ds were below 10.0% at all concentration levels. CONCLUSIONS: The advantage of this method is that it measures both compounds in a more rapid, reproducible and accurate manner when compared to the previous HPLC studies. The compounds (vitamin A and E and internal standards) are measured in the same sample at the same time. Quantitative determination of cotinine may reveal active smokers and subjects exposed to environmental tobacco smoke, which is independent measurable carcinogenetic co-factor. The following study is a part of a project determining non-viral causative agents in cervical carcinogenesis.


Subject(s)
Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid/methods , Cotinine/blood , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/blood , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/blood , Vitamin A/blood , alpha-Tocopherol/blood , Adult , Cotinine/urine , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Poland , Reference Standards , Reproducibility of Results , Risk Factors , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/urine , Vitamin A/urine , alpha-Tocopherol/urine , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/urine
15.
Sci Rep ; 9(1): 3088, 2019 02 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30816167

ABSTRACT

Urine samples provide a potential alternative to physician-taken or self-collected cervical samples for cervical screening. Screening by primary hrHPV testing requires additional risk assessment (so-called triage) of hrHPV-positive women. Molecular markers, such as DNA methylation, have proven most valuable for triage when applied to cervical specimens. This study was set out to compare hrHPV and DNA methylation results in paired urine and cervical scrapes, and to evaluate the feasibility of DNA methylation analysis in urine to detect cervical cancer. Urine samples (n = 41; native and sediment) and paired cervical scrapes (n = 38) from cervical cancer patients, and urine from 44 female controls, were tested for hrHPV and 6 methylation markers. Results on native urine and sediment were highly comparable. A strong agreement was found between hrHPV testing on urine and scrapes (kappa = 0.79). Also, methylation levels in urine were moderately to strongly correlated to those detected in scrapes (r = 0.508-0.717). All markers were significantly increased in urine from cervical cancer patients compared to controls and showed a good discriminatory power for cervical cancer (AUC = 0.744-0.887). Our results show a good agreement of urine-based molecular analysis with reference cervical samples, and suggest that urine-based DNA methylation testing may provide a promising strategy for cervical cancer detection.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Carcinoma, Adenosquamous , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell , DNA Methylation , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Papillomaviridae/isolation & purification , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Adenocarcinoma/diagnosis , Adenocarcinoma/urine , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biomarkers, Tumor/urine , Carcinoma, Adenosquamous/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Adenosquamous/urine , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/urine , Cervix Uteri/metabolism , Cervix Uteri/pathology , Cervix Uteri/virology , Female , Humans , Mass Screening/methods , Middle Aged , Papillomavirus Infections/urine , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/urine , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/urine
16.
Anal Chem ; 80(9): 3095-104, 2008 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18396914

ABSTRACT

We describe a new time alignment method that takes advantage of both dimensions of LC-MS data to resolve ambiguities in peak matching while remaining computationally efficient. This approach, Warp2D, combines peak extraction with a two-dimensional correlation function to provide a reliable alignment scoring function that is insensitive to spurious peaks and background noise. One-dimensional alignment methods are often based on the total-ion-current elution profile of the spectrum and are unable to distinguish peaks of different masses. Our approach uses one-dimensional alignment in time, but with a scoring function derived from the overlap of peaks in two dimensions, thereby combining the specificity of two-dimensional methods with the computational performance of one-dimensional methods. The peaks are approximated as two-dimensional Gaussians of varying width. This approximation allows peak overlap (the measure of alignment quality) to be calculated analytically, without computationally intensive numerical integration in two dimensions. To demonstrate the general applicability of Warp2D, we chose a variety of complex samples that have substantial biological and analytical variability, including human serum and urine. We show that Warp2D works well with these diverse sample sets and with minimal tuning of parameters, based on the reduced standard deviation of peak elution times after warping. The combination of high computational speed, robustness with complex samples, and lack of need for detailed tuning makes this alignment method well suited to high-throughput LC-MS studies.


Subject(s)
Data Interpretation, Statistical , Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry/methods , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Animals , Blood Proteins/analysis , Cytochromes c/analysis , Female , Horses , Humans , Middle Aged , Pregnancy , Urinalysis/methods , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/blood , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/urine
17.
Gynecol Oncol ; 109(1): 59-64, 2008 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18255129

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the PCR detection rates of high risk human papillomavirus DNA in self-collected urine and cervical scrapes during follow-up of patients treated for HG-CIN by laser CO2 conization. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 52 women who submitted to laser conization for HG-CIN were enrolled into this prospective follow-up study receiving liquid-based cytology and HR-HPV testing by PCR assay on self-collected urine and cervical scrapes before and at 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment. Diagnostic accuracy and predictive values for treatment failure were evaluated for both urinary and cervical HPV testing and follow-up cytology. RESULTS: 3 cases (5.8%) of recurrent HG-CIN occurred during follow-up. Positive margins and HR-HPV persistence resulted to significant risk factors for recurrence (p=0.01). The overall concordance on HR-HPV detection between paired urine and cervical samples was 96.6% and discord trend between agreement rates during follow-up were excluded by overall fixed-effect index (OR 1.03; 95% CI 0.62-1.70). No difference was observed comparing the three- and six-month cumulative sensitivity and NPV for recurrent disease of urinary and cervical HPV detections, with an increase of 5.6% in specificity associated with urinary testing. CONCLUSIONS: PCR detection of HR-HPV in paired urine and cervical samples during follow-up revealed an excellent concordance, suggesting a potential equivalent role of the two methods within post-treatment follow-up. In our experience HPV testing on self-collected urine was more sensitive than cytology and more specific than cervical HPV detection to predict treatment failure. Larger studies are needed to definitively establish the role of urine-based HPV testing during follow-up.


Subject(s)
DNA, Viral/analysis , Papillomaviridae/genetics , Papillomavirus Infections/urine , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/urine , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology , Adolescent , Adult , Conization , DNA, Viral/urine , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Laser Therapy , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/virology , Papillomaviridae/isolation & purification , Papillomavirus Infections/pathology , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Prospective Studies , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/surgery , Vaginal Smears , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/pathology , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/surgery , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/virology
18.
Theranostics ; 8(2): 399-409, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29290816

ABSTRACT

Purpose: As human papillomavirus (HPV) is primarily responsible for the development of cervical cancer, significant efforts have been devoted to develop novel strategies for detecting and identifying HPV DNA in urine. The analysis of target DNA sequences in urine offers a potential alternative to conventional methods as a non-invasive clinical screening and diagnostic assessment tool for the detection of HPV. However, the lack of efficient approaches to isolate and directly detect HPV DNA in urine has restricted its potential clinical use. In this study, we demonstrated a novel approach of using polyethylenimine-conjugated magnetic polypyrrole nanowires (PEI-mPpy NWs) for the extraction, identification, and PCR-free colorimetric detection of high-risk strains of HPV DNA sequences, particularly HPV-16 and HPV-18, in urine specimens of cervical cancer patients. Materials and Methods: We fabricated and characterized polyethylenimine-conjugated magnetic nanowires (PEI/mPpy NWs). PEI/mPpy NWs-based HPV DNA isolation and detection strategy appears to be a cost-effective and practical technology with greater sensitivity and accuracy than other urine-based methods. Results: The analytical and clinical performance of PEI-mPpy NWs was evaluated and compared with those of cervical swabs, demonstrating a superior type-specific concordance rate of 100% between urine and cervical swabs, even when using a small volume of urine (300 µL). Conclusion: We envision that PEI-mPpy NWs provide substantive evidence for clinical diagnosis and management of HPV-associated disease with their excellent performance in the recovery and detection of HPV DNA from minimal amounts of urine samples.


Subject(s)
DNA, Viral/urine , Nanowires/virology , Papillomaviridae/genetics , Papillomavirus Infections/urine , Urine/virology , Colorimetry , Female , Humans , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/urine , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology
19.
Sci Rep ; 8(1): 9015, 2018 06 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29899531

ABSTRACT

This pilot study sought to evaluate the feasibility of utilizing vaginal self-swabs and urine samples for HPV-based cervical cancer screening in 700 women who had undergone conventional Pap smear screening via the national cervical cancer program in Korea. The cobas 4800 HPV test was utilized to detect HPV in the self-samples. Pap smear results revealed three cases of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance, 649 cases of negative for an intraepithelial lesion or malignancy, and 48 non-specific inflammatory findings. High-risk HPV was detected in 6.7% of urine samples and 9.6% of vaginal self-swab samples. The overall agreement for HPV 16/18 between urine and vaginal self-swab samples was 99.1% (95%CI 98.1% to 99.6%). Colposcopic biopsy revealed one cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 3 lesion, 12 CIN1 lesions, and 23 normal or chronic cervicitis lesions. In conclusion, urine and vaginal self-swab sampling was feasible and deemed a potential alternative for HPV detection in women who hesitate to participate in cervical cancer screening programs. Meanwhile, due to overall lower rates of abnormal cytology and sexual risk behaviors in Korea, a larger sample size than expected is needed to assess the sensitivity of CIN2+ detection via self-samples.


Subject(s)
Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Human papillomavirus 16/physiology , Human papillomavirus 18/physiology , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology , Vagina/virology , Adult , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Papanicolaou Test , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Papillomavirus Infections/urine , Pilot Projects , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of Results , Republic of Korea , Sensitivity and Specificity , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/urine
20.
PLoS One ; 13(12): e0209936, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30592768

ABSTRACT

Genital human papillomavirus (HPV) is the world's most commonly diagnosed sexually transmitted infection, and high-risk HPV types are strongly linked to cervical dysplasia and carcinoma. Puerto Ricans are among the US citizens with higher HPV prevalence and lower screening rates and access to treatment. This bleak statistic was as a motivation to detect biomarkers for early diagnosis of HPV in this population. We collected both urine and cervical swabs from 43 patients attending San Juan Clinics. Cervical swabs were used for genomic DNA extractions and HPV genotyping with the HPV SPF10-LiPA25 kit, and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) was employed on the urine-derived products for metabolomics analyses. We aimed at discriminating between patients with different HPV categories: HPV negative (HPV-), HPV positive with simultaneous low and high-risk infections (HPV+B) and HPV positive exclusively high-risk (HPV+H). We found that the metabolome of HPV+B is closer to HPV- than to HPV+H supporting evidence that suggests HPV co-infections may be antagonistic due to viral interference leading to a lower propensity for cervical cancer development. In contrast, metabolites of patients with HPV+H were significantly different from those that were HPV-. We identified three urinary metabolites 5-Oxoprolinate, Erythronic acid and N-Acetylaspartic acid that discriminate HPV+H cases from negative controls. These metabolites are known to be involved in a variety of biochemical processes related to energy and metabolism and may likely be biomarkers for HPV high-risk cervical infection. However, further validation should follow using a larger patient cohort and diverse populations to confirm our finding.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/urine , Metabolomics , Papillomaviridae , Papillomavirus Infections/urine , Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Viral/urine , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/urine , Adult , Cervix Uteri/metabolism , Cervix Uteri/pathology , Cervix Uteri/virology , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Papillomavirus Infections/pathology , Prevalence , Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Viral/epidemiology , Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Viral/pathology , Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Viral/virology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL