Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
J Nutr Health Aging ; 25(2): 224-229, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33491038

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Anticholinergic burden defined by the Anticholinergic Risk Scale (ARS) has been associated with cognitive and functional decline. Associations with health-related quality of life (HRQoL) have been scarcely studied. The aim of this study was to examine the association between anticholinergic burden and HRQoL among older people living in long-term care. Further, we investigated whether there is an interaction between ARS score and HRQoL in certain underlying conditions. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional study in 2017. Participants were older people residing in long-term care facilities (N=2474) in Helsinki. MEASUREMENTS: Data on anticholinergic burden was assessed by ARS score, nutritional status by Mini Nutritional Assessment, and HRQoL by the 15D instrument. RESULTS: Of the participants, 54% regularly used ARS-defined drugs, and 22% had ARS scores ≥2. Higher ARS scores were associated with better cognition, functioning, nutritional status and higher HRQoL. When viewing participants separately according to a diagnosis of dementia, nutritional status or level of dependency, HRQoL was lower among those having dementia, worse nutritional status, or being dependent on another person's help (adjusted for age, sex, comorbidities). Significant differences within the groups according to ARS score were no longer observed. However, interactions between ARS score and dementia and dependency emerged. CONCLUSION: In primary analysis there was an association between ARS score and HRQoL. However, this relationship disappeared after stratification by dementia, nutritional status and dependency. The reasons behind the interaction concerning dementia or dependency remain unclear and warrant further studies.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas Colinérgicos/efectos adversos , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/métodos , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antagonistas Colinérgicos/farmacología , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino
2.
Drugs Aging ; 38(10): 931-937, 2021 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34386937

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pain is undertreated in older populations. At the same time, increased use of opioids is of concern in the Western world. AIMS: We sought to analyze temporal trends in musculoskeletal pain and prescribed analgesic treatment among community-dwelling people aged 75-95 years using cross-sectional cohort data spanning 20 years. METHODS: The Helsinki Aging Study recruited random samples of people aged 75, 80, 85, 90, and 95 years in 1999, 2009, and 2019. In total, 5707 community-dwelling persons participated in the study. The participants reported their medical diagnoses, regular prescription medications, and the presence of back pain or joint pain within the last 2 weeks (never, sometimes, or daily). We compared analgesic use among participants reporting and not reporting musculoskeletal pain in 1999, 2009, and 2019. RESULTS: Of the participants, 57-61% reported intermittent or daily musculoskeletal pain. The percentage receiving a prescribed daily analgesic increased from 9% in 1999 to 16% in 2019. The use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) decreased from 1999 to 2019, while the use of paracetamol increased from 2 to 11%. Opioids were taken by 2% in 1999 and 3% in 2019. Of those reporting daily musculoskeletal pain, 20%, 35%, and 32% received regular pain medication in 1999, 2009, and 2019, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Pain remains undertreated in the community-dwelling older population, although the use of regular prescribed analgesics increased between 1999 and 2019. The use of NSAIDs has decreased, while the use of paracetamol has increased. Daily opioid use has remained modest.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Musculoesquelético , Anciano , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Vida Independiente , Dolor Musculoesquelético/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Musculoesquelético/epidemiología , Prevalencia
4.
Acta Psychiatr Scand ; 57(1): 27-35, 1978 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24980

RESUMEN

Efficacy and side effects of flurazepam 15 mg, fosazepam 60 mg, and nitrazepam 5 mg were studied in 17 psychogeriatric patients. The drugs were equipotent in maintaining sleep but nitrazepam had more side effects than the other hypnotics, and it induced a rebound insomnia after withdrawal. All hypnotics lost some of their efficacy towards the end of 7 days' administration. Patients with evident cerebrovascular disease were vulnerable to the side effects of the benzodiazepine hypnotics. The side effects did not correlate with the age of a patient. In addition, no correlations were found between the serum levels of fosazepam or its main metabolite and the side effects.


Asunto(s)
Ansiolíticos/uso terapéutico , Diazepam/análogos & derivados , Flurazepam/uso terapéutico , Trastornos Mentales , Nitrazepam/uso terapéutico , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Diazepam/efectos adversos , Diazepam/uso terapéutico , Evaluación de Medicamentos , Femenino , Flurazepam/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Memoria/efectos de los fármacos , Actividad Motora/efectos de los fármacos , Nitrazepam/efectos adversos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA