Pharmacist Prescribing Models for HIV Pre-exposure and Post-exposure Prophylaxis.

State strategies for pharmacist prescribing exist on a continuum from most restrictive to least restrictive. Using human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) pre-exposure prophylaxis and post-exposure prophylaxis as a case study, there are 3 viable pharmacist prescribing models: (1) population-based collaborative practice agreements; (2) government protocols; and (3) standard of care prescribing. The advantages and disadvantages of these 3 models are reviewed.

How to implement a "standard of care" regulatory model for pharmacists.

National pharmacy associations have increasingly explored regulation according to a "standard of care." In such a model, pharmacists can provide a wide range of clinical services aligned with their education and training. Based on Idaho's experience implementing this model, there are five critical steps states must take to enact a standard of care: 1) Adopt a broad definition of "practice of pharmacy;" 2) Allow elasticity for practice innovation over time; 3) Decide which limited instances still necessitate prescriptive regulation; 4) Eliminate all unnecessary regulations; and 5) Strengthen accountability for deviations from the standard of care. States wishing to adopt a standard of care approach can follow this five-step process to enhance patient care and mitigate the lag that is otherwise constant between laws and practice.

Tiered Licensure for Pharmacy Technicians: Is the Advanced Pharmacy Technician (APhT) License the Model for State Regulators?

Two states-Connecticut and New Hampshire-have created or attempted to create advanced pharmacy technician (APhT) licenses. Both licenses, proposed and actual, have high barriers to entry, such as requiring 1 to 3 years of prior technician experience and passage of various assessments or trainings, such as a state-specific jurisprudence exam. Those obtaining APhT licensure are granted additional authority, such as performing final product verification (e.g., tech-check-tech) and vaccine administration. Compared with practices in other states, the APhT role in CT and NH provides minimal scope gains relative to the requirements imposed; as a result, there has been limited uptake (<1%) among current technicians. As such, it appears unlikely that tiered licensure for technicians will be the preferred mechanism for states to expand the role of pharmacy technicians in the future.

Facilitating multistate pharmacy practice: Streamlining continuing pharmacy education requirements.

A major regulatory impediment to achieving multistate pharmacist licensure is state-specific Continuing Pharmacy Education (CPE) mandates. States vary on CPE requirements in 6 key domains, presenting a potentially significant administrative burden for multistate pharmacists. In the short term, replicating the nursing compact model of CPE regulation is the most viable model for the pharmacy profession. In this model, a pharmacist would have to follow just the CPE requirements for the state where the pharmacist maintains primary residence, and maintenance of this home state license would be automatically recognized by other states in which the pharmacist practices.

Revisiting the continuum of pharmacist prescriptive authority.

Pharmacists in all states have prescriptive authority in some form. We identify two broad categories of pharmacist prescribing: dependent and independent. There are gradients within these broad categories that allow us to chart pharmacist prescribing on a continuum from most restrictive to least restrictive. Independent prescribing has seen the most innovation in recent years at the state level, with at least three states adopting a "standard of care" prescribing framework that allows pharmacists to exercise broad prescriptive authority including for conditions that require a diagnosis. Each of the approaches to pharmacist prescriptive authority have perceived advantages and disadvantages as it relates to improving patient care.

Opportunities for pharmacist prescriptive authority of buprenorphine following passage of the Mainstreaming Addiction Treatment (MAT) Act.

In December 2022, Congress passed the Mainstreaming Addiction Treatment Act, which removed the federal legal barrier to pharmacist buprenorphine prescribing. As a result, each state can now decide whether or not to allow pharmacists to prescribe buprenorphine as an additional access point to reduce fatal opioid overdoses. At least 10 states allow pharmacists to prescribe controlled substances under collaborative practice agreements. Two states (California and Idaho) have also created pathways for independent prescribing of buprenorphine by pharmacists. Additional states should seek to enable pharmacists to prescribe buprenorphine to increase access to a proven beneficial treatment and help reduce fatal opioid overdoses.

Extending COVID-19 Pharmacy Technician Duties: Impact on Safety and Pharmacist Jobs.

Background: The 2019 coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) led to an expanded scope of practice for pharmacy technicians. As the pandemic wanes, state governments are faced with the decision of whether or not to make permanent the authority of pharmacy technicians to perform extended duties. Objective: Determine the impacts on patient safety and job market demands preadoption and postadoption of Idaho's expanded technician duties in 2017 as a natural experiment for expanded technician duties. Methods: Data from the National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB) is used to explore patient safety outcomes in Idaho preadoption and postadoption and as compared with its border states. Data from Pharmacy Demand Reports is used to compare job postings in Idaho and its border state, and National Association of Boards of Pharmacy census data are used to compare growth in the number of pharmacists and technicians in Idaho and its border states over time. Results: For Idaho pharmacists, the average number of disciplinary actions reported against both pharmacists and technicians dropped after implementation of expanded technician duties. Idaho also had a lower rate of discipline for pharmacists and technicians than its border states. Idaho had the third highest job postings for pharmacists and the second highest for technicians among its border states. Idaho also had the largest growth in the number of licensed pharmacists and technicians of the observed states in the study period. Conclusion: Available statewide data from Idaho as compared with its border states suggests that expanded technician duties did not adversely impact patient safety outcomes or the pharmacist job market. Additional states may wish to expand pharmacy technician duties in the years ahead.

Pharmacy technician-administered immunizations: A five-year review.

In October 2020, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) issued guidance authorizing trained pharmacy technicians in all states to administer immunizations. Given that this action is temporary, it will be necessary for states to adopt their own legislation or regulations to sustain these efforts beyond the coronavirus pandemic. At least 11 different immunization administration training programs have emerged for pharmacy technicians. An increasing number of publications have emerged on pharmacy technician immunization administration, demonstrating the ability to train technicians and have them safely administer immunizations in practice. Supervising pharmacists reported initial hesitancy but strong acceptance of delegating this task after experience in practice. States should look to expand and make permanent the authority of pharmacy technicians to ensure these benefits can continue to be realized after the HHS guidance expires.

Toward Multistate Pharmacy Practice: Enhancing Mobility and Portability of Pharmacist Licensure.

Pharmacists are licensed in all 50 states. As society becomes increasingly mobile and interconnected, several models of cross-state pharmacy practice have emerged, straining the current state-based system of licensure. The nursing profession has provided a model for license portability that offers 3 primary advantages over the current pharmacist licensure model while still protecting safety: (1) faster speed, (2) lower cost, and (3) reduced administrative burden. A hybrid approach for the pharmacy profession that builds off of the expedited license transfer model and adds a mutual recognition model is ideal.

Pharmacists' Patient Care Process: State "Scope of Practice" Priorities for Action.

To fully engage in the Pharmacists' Patient Care Process, pharmacists must be able to (1) participate in a Collaborative Practice Agreement, (2) order and interpret laboratory tests, (3) prescribe certain medications, (4) adapt medications, (5) administer medications, and (6) effectively delegate tasks to support staff. Each of these activities is dependent on state scope of practice laws, but these laws are not binary. Various state-level restrictions allow us to view these activities on a continuum from more restrictive to less restrictive. This continuum will allow pharmacy and public health stakeholders to identify priorities for action in their states.

Pharmacy Regulatory Innovation Index: Benchmarking the regulatory environment in 10 western states.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacy is among the most regulated of health professions on the basis of both word count and restrictions. State-level restrictions limit the ability of pharmacists to be fully engaged as members of the health care team. OBJECTIVE: This paper aimed to create a simple benchmark-the Pharmacy Regulatory Innovation Index (PRII)-that takes into account the scope-of-practice allowances that a state provides to pharmacists and the overall regulatory burden for the pharmacy profession using 10 western states as a sample. METHODS: A scorecard was developed on the basis of the activities reported as necessary for pharmacists to fully engage in the Pharmacists' Patient Care Process (PPCP). The laws and regulations of 10 western states were analyzed using plain-text interpretation. RESULTS: The 10 western states fall into 3 of 4 distinct quadrants. Three states appear in the highly regulated, low-innovation quadrant (Oregon, California, and Nevada), and 2 states appear in the low-regulated, high-innovation quadrant (Idaho and Washington). The remaining 5 states fall in the low-regulated, low-innovation quadrant (Alaska, Hawaii, Montana, Utah, and Wyoming). CONCLUSION: The PRII has been created to assess a state's regulatory burden and its scope-of-practice allowances, using the PPCP as a guide for innovation. States can use the PRII tool to benchmark their regulations in comparison with those of peer states and identify opportunities for improvement.

Rethinking pharmacy regulation: Core elements of Idaho's transition to a "Standard of Care" approach.

The National Association of Boards of Pharmacy recently established a task force to explore the feasibility of developing regulations based on "standards of care" rather than "prescriptive rule-based regulation." The Board sought to update its professional practice standards by transitioning from prescriptive regulations to a "standard of care" model that harmonizes pharmacists education and training with their legal scope of practice. In doing so, the Board expanded practice authority to include prescription adaptation services and independent prescribing of certain drug classes. As the Board approached how to update its facility standards, it pursued 2 primary goals: (1) Make the regulations practice- and technology-agnostic; and (2) Enable decentralization of pharmacy functions to offsite locations. The Board achieved its goal of reducing overall word count and restrictions in its laws. The Board also created a more permissive professional practice standard rooted in a "standard of care" approach that is more closely aligned with the regulatory model employed by the medical and nursing professions.

Pharmacy Technicians Are People, Too! Let's Consider Their Personal Outcomes Along With Other Pharmacy Outcomes.

Studies have found that expanded pharmacy technician roles can help "free up" pharmacist time, leading to role optimization. However, these studies and the positions taken by many are quite pharmacist-centric. We seem to have underestimated the importance of support staff in pharmacy operations. If research demonstrates that technicians can perform a function safely and effectively, that alone should compel the function's allowance in practice. Freeing up pharmacist time for higher-order care is a positive corollary to technician advancement, but it need not be a precondition for it.

Improving access to appropriate post-exposure doxycycline for Lyme disease prophylaxis: role for community pharmacies.

The transmission of Borrelia burgdorferi to humans through tick bites results in Lyme disease. Appropriate therapy for Lyme disease is antibacterial drugs, most often doxycycline. Patients often approach community pharmacists for self-care assistance with the symptoms of Lyme disease: fever, headache, fatigue and skin rash. Pharmacists with the patient history are trained and capable of appropriately dispensing doxycycline to treat these patients and prevent the spread of infection to the joints, nerves or heart. We challenge restrictions to the appropriate and timely provision of therapy for Lyme disease and encourage the use of community pharmacists in managing these patients.

Prescription Adaptation Services: A Regulatory and Practice Perspective.

"Prescription adaptation services" refers to the ability of a pharmacist to autonomously "adapt" an existing prescription when the action is intended to optimize the therapeutic outcome. Adaptation services typically fall into 2 categories: (1) renewals and (2) changes. Renewals ensure continuity of care for patients and may be emergency renewals (typically 72 hours) or continuation-of-therapy renewals (typically 90 or more days). Changes include therapeutic substitutions or changes to quantity, formulation, route of administration, dose/interval, and completing missing information. With an appropriate framework in place, adaptation services can safely optimize medication therapy outcomes while promoting efficiencies.

Pharmacist prescriptive authority for smoking cessation medications in the United States.

OBJECTIVES: To characterize the status of state laws regarding the expansion of pharmacists' prescriptive authority for smoking cessation medications and to summarize frequently asked questions and answers that arose during the associated legislative debates. DATA SOURCES: Legislative language was reviewed and summarized for all states with expanded authority, and literature supporting the pharmacist's capacity for an expanded role in smoking cessation is described. SUMMARY: The core elements of autonomous tobacco cessation prescribing models for pharmacists vary across states. Of 7 states that currently have fully or partially delineated protocols, 4 states (Colorado, Idaho, Indiana, New Mexico) include all medications approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for smoking cessation, and 3 (Arizona, California, Maine) include nicotine replacement therapy products only. The state protocol in Oregon is under development. Most states specify minimum cessation education requirements and define specific elements (e.g., patient screening, cessation intervention components, and documentation requirements) for the autonomous prescribing models. CONCLUSION: Through expanded authority and national efforts to advance the tobacco cessation knowledge and skills of pharmacy students and licensed pharmacists, the profession's role in tobacco cessation has evolved substantially in recent years. Eight states have created, or are in the process of creating, pathways for autonomous pharmacist prescriptive authority. States aiming to advance tobacco control strategies to help patients quit smoking might consider approaches like those undertaken in 8 states.

Pharmacy-Based Travel Health Services: State Approaches to Prescriptive Authority.

Pharmacists have provided travel health services in some capacity for more than 25 years. The ability of pharmacists to autonomously prescribe travel medications is growing. Three states (California, Idaho, and New Mexico) allow pharmacists to autonomously prescribe medications for international travel using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Yellow Book as a guide. Idaho also allows pharmacists to autonomously prescribe select medications appropriate to domestic travel (motion sickness prevention and Lyme disease prophylaxis), and Florida allows for the prescribing of drugs for motion sickness. Core elements from each state law including education, patient assessment, provider notification, and documentation are reviewed.

Outpatient antibiotic stewardship: Interventions and opportunities.

Improving the use of antibiotics across the continuum of care is a national priority. Data outlining the misuse of antibiotics in the outpatient setting justify the expansion of antibiotic stewardship programs (ASPs) into this health care setting; however, best practices for outpatient antibiotic stewardship (AS) are not yet defined. In a companion article, we focused on recommendations to overcome challenges related to the implementation of an outpatient ASP (e.g., building the AS team and defining program metrics). In this document, we outline AS interventions that have demonstrated success and highlight opportunities to enhance AS in the outpatient arena. This article summarizes examples of point-of-care testing, policies and interventions, and education strategies to improve antibiotic use that can be used in the outpatient setting.