Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 2024 Aug 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39110348

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Concrete, data-driven guidelines for breast cancer screening among the transgender and gender diverse (TGD) population is lacking. The present study evaluates possible associations of gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) on incidental breast pathology findings in trans-masculine patients to inform decision making about breast cancer screening. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who had gender-affirming mastectomy or breast reduction at a single center from July 2019 to February 2024. A total of 865 patients met the inclusion criteria. Gender-affirming testosterone therapy and length of exposure were evaluated to seek differences in post-operative pathology findings. RESULTS: The median age at the time of surgery was 27 years [interquartile range (IQR) 21-30]. Most participants identified as female to male (658, 75.6%). A significant portion of the participants (688, 79.2%) were undergoing testosterone therapy at the time of surgery, with the median duration of testosterone use prior to surgery being 14 months (IQR 4-29). High risk or malignant findings were noted in pathology results for 12 of 1730 breasts (0.7%). Ordered logistic regression found that duration of testosterone therapy was not associated with increasing severity of incidental breast pathology. Additionally, patients under 25 years of age were 70% less likely to have any incidental finding on pathological evaluation than older patients [odds ratio (OR) 0.3, p < 0.01, confidence interval (CI) 0.18-0.50]. CONCLUSIONS: The present study found that patients undergoing GAHT should not be screened for breast cancer with increased frequency compared with cis-gender women. Additionally, it may be appropriate for trans women under the age of 25 with normal breast cancer risk to forego pathological breast tissue examination.

2.
Cancer ; 125(11): 1807-1814, 2019 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30707774

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Screening mammography reduces breast cancer mortality at the cost of frequent false-positive results that lead to unnecessary medical procedures, and the treatment of indolent breast cancers that would never threaten life or health. Earlier diagnosis generally permits less disruptive treatment, but it is possible that even the diagnosis of a very small breast cancer could significantly adversely impact health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in older women. METHODS: The authors compared changes in HRQOL measured by either the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form (SF-36) or the Veterans Rand 12-item Health Survey (VR-12) between 198 women diagnosed with in situ or invasive breast cancer measuring ≤1 cm and 36,814 matched controls using the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results cancer registry linked with the Medicare Health Outcomes Survey. RESULTS: The mean age of the cases and controls was 75 years. The SF-36/VR-12 physical component score 12 was found to decrease by 1.6 points between the baseline and follow-up surveys for the controls compared with 3.2 points for women diagnosed with small breast cancers (P = .016). A 2-point decline is recognized as the minimally significant difference for this measure. On multivariable analysis, diagnosis of a small breast cancer was found to be one of the strongest predictors of a significant decrease in both the physical and mental domains of HRQOL (P = .012 and P = .023, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Receiving the diagnosis of even a very small breast cancer significantly impacts the physical and mental domains of HRQOL in older women. This finding can inform discussions regarding the relative benefits and costs of screening mammography in older women.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Mama in situ/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma de Mama in situ/psicología , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/psicología , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Femenino , Humanos , Mamografía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Programa de VERF , Carga Tumoral , Estados Unidos
3.
J Surg Res ; 208: 111-120, 2017 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27993198

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Data-assessing trends and perioperative outcomes relative to surgical approach for colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery are lacking. We report national trends of CRC surgery and compare postoperative outcomes by surgical approach. METHODS: A total of 261,886 patients undergoing surgery for CRC were identified using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2009 to 2012. Trends in surgical approach were assessed using the Cochrane-Armitage test of trends. Multivariable logistic and linear regression analyses were performed to compare length of stay (LOS), postoperative complications, and cost by surgical approach. RESULTS: At the time of surgery, 57.5% underwent an open procedure, whereas 42.4% underwent either a laparoscopic (39.9%) or robotic (2.5%) colorectal surgery. The use of minimally invasive surgery increased over time (2009 versus 2012: 37.3% versus 46.8%; P < 0.001). Postoperative morbidity was 15.9% and was higher after open surgery (open versus laparoscopic versus robotic: 18.4% versus 12.4% versus 13.3%; P < 0.001). Patients who underwent a minimally invasive surgery had shorter LOS (laparoscopic: OR, 0.55, 95% CI, 0.52-0.58; robotic: OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.49-0.69; both P < 0.001). Robotic surgery was consistently associated with the highest mean costs followed by laparoscopic and open surgery (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing minimally invasive colorectal surgery had a lower postoperative morbidity and shorter LOS compared with patients undergoing open colorectal surgery.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/tendencias , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Transversales , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Laparoscopía , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Robótica , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
4.
Cureus ; 12(6): e8555, 2020 Jun 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32670692

RESUMEN

The incidence rate for melanoma continues to rise in the USA. The majority of melanoma cases are detected at an early stage and are amenable to surgical excision. Advanced melanoma with diffuse intraabdominal metastasis is rare. We present a case of a 50-year-old female with no known primary or history of melanoma who presented with massive intraabdominal bleeding secondary to diffuse metastatic melanoma with peritoneal implants. Diagnosing metastatic melanoma could be challenging. Clinicians should be aware of hemoperitoneum or peritoneal carcinomatosis as potential manifestations of malignant melanoma to expedite appropriate management.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA