Deep Brain Stimulation for the Management of AIFM1-Related Disabling Tremor: A Case Series.

The AIFM1 gene encodes a mitochondrial protein that acts as a flavin adenine dinucleotide-dependent nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide oxidase and apoptosis regulator. Monoallelic pathogenic AIFM1 variants result in a spectrum of X-linked neurological disorders, including Cowchock syndrome. Common features in Cowchock syndrome include a slowly progressive movement disorder, cerebellar ataxia, progressive sensorineural hearing loss, and sensory neuropathy. We identified a novel maternally inherited hemizygous missense AIFM1 variant, c.1369C>T p.(His457Tyr), in two brothers with clinical features consistent with Cowchock syndrome using next-generation sequencing. Both individuals had a progressive complex movement disorder phenotype, including disabling tremor poorly responsive to medications. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the ventral intermediate thalamic nucleus ameliorated contralateral tremor and improved their quality of life; this suggests the beneficial role for DBS in treatment-resistant tremor within AIFM1-related disorders.

Connectivity-based selection of optimal deep brain stimulation contacts: A feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: The selection of optimal deep brain stimulation (DBS) parameters is time-consuming, experience-dependent, and best suited when acute effects of stimulation can be observed (e.g., tremor reduction). OBJECTIVES: To test the hypothesis that optimal stimulation location can be estimated based on the cortical connections of DBS contacts. METHODS: We analyzed a cohort of 38 patients with Parkinson's disease (24 training, and 14 test cohort). Using whole-brain probabilistic tractography, we first mapped the cortical regions associated with stimulation-induced efficacy (rigidity, bradykinesia, and tremor improvement) and side effects (paresthesia, motor contractions, and visual disturbances). We then trained a support vector machine classifier to categorize DBS contacts into efficacious, defined by a therapeutic window ≥2 V (threshold for side effect minus threshold for efficacy), based on their connections with cortical regions associated with efficacy versus side effects. The connectivity-based classifications were then compared with actual stimulation contacts using receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curves. RESULTS: Unique cortical clusters were associated with stimulation-induced efficacy and side effects. In the training dataset, 42 of the 47 stimulation contacts were accurately classified as efficacious, with a therapeutic window of ≥3 V in 31 (66%) and between 2 and 2.9 V in 11 (24%) electrodes. This connectivity-based estimation was successfully replicated in the test cohort with similar accuracy (area under ROC = 0.83). CONCLUSIONS: Cortical connections can predict the efficacy of DBS contacts and potentially facilitate DBS programming. The clinical utility of this paradigm in optimizing DBS outcomes should be prospectively tested, especially for directional electrodes.

Prospective Tractography-Based Targeting for Improved Safety of Focused Ultrasound Thalamotomy.

BACKGROUND: Focused ultrasound thalamotomy (FUS-T) was recently approved for the treatment of refractory essential tremor (ET). Despite its noninvasive approach, FUS-T reinitiated concerns about the adverse effects and long-term efficacy after lesioning. OBJECTIVE: To prospectively assess the outcomes of FUS-T in 10 ET patients using tractography-based targeting of the ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM). METHODS: VIM was identified at the intercommissural plane based on its neighboring tracts: the pyramidal tract and medial lemniscus. FUS-T was performed at the center of tractography-defined VIM. Tremor outcomes, at baseline and 3 mo, were assessed independently by the Tremor Research Group. We analyzed targeting coordinates, clinical outcomes, and adverse events. The FUS-T lesion location was analyzed in relation to unbiased thalamic parcellation using probabilisitic tractography. Quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging changes were also studied in fiber tracts of interest. RESULTS: The tractography coordinates were more anterior than the standard. Intraoperatively, therapeutic sonications at the tractography target improved tremor (>50% improvement) without motor or sensory side effects. Sustained improvement in tremor was observed at 3 mo (tremor score: 18.3 ± 6.9 vs 8.1 ± 4.4, P = .001). No motor weakness and sensory deficits after FUS-T were observed during 6-mo follow-up. Ataxia was observed in 3 patients. FUS-T lesions overlapped with the VIM parcellated with probablisitic tractography. Significant microstructural changes were observed in the white matter connecting VIM with cerebellum and motor cortex. CONCLUSION: This is the first report of prospective VIM targeting with tractography for FUS-T. These results suggest that tractography-guided targeting is safe and has satisfactory short-term clinical outcomes.

Dopaminergic modulation of semantic priming in Parkinson disease.

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose is to examine the effect of D2/D3 agonists on semantic priming. BACKGROUND: Dopamine seems to restrict the semantic network in semantic priming. However, which dopamine receptor mediates this effect is unknown. METHODS: To better understand the receptors involved, 15 nondemented Parkinson disease patients performed a lexical decision task before and 1 hour after they received their first morning medication dose, 8 after D2 and D3 agonists pramipexole or ropinirole, and 7 after L-dopa. Semantic priming was measured for closely, distantly, and unrelated word pairs across a stimulus onset asynchrony of 700 ms. RESULTS: Closely related pairs were recognized significantly faster than unrelated and distantly related pairs before the drugs, as well as after D2/D3 agents. After L-dopa, closely related pairs remained faster than unrelated, but not faster than distantly related pairs. CONCLUSIONS: This suggests that D1 receptors may mediate the dopaminergic modulation of semantic priming.

Deep Brain Stimulation of Frontal Lobe Networks to Treat Alzheimer's Disease.

The study objective was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of deep brain stimulation (DBS) at the ventral capsule/ventral striatum (VC/VS) region to specifically modulate frontal lobe behavioral and cognitive networks as a novel treatment approach for Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients. This is a non-randomized phase I prospective open label interventional trial of three subjects with matched comparison groups. AD participants given DBS for at least 18 months at the VC/VS target were compared on the Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB), our primary outcome clinical measure, to matched groups without DBS from the AD Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) cohort. Serial 2-Deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) images of AD participants were also compared longitudinally over time. Three AD DBS participants were matched to subjects from the ADNI cohort. All participants tolerated DBS well without significant adverse events. All three AD DBS participants had less performance decline and two of them meaningfully less decline over time on our primary outcome measure, CDR-SB, relative to matched comparison groups from the ADNI using score trajectory slopes. Minimal changes or increased metabolism on FDG-PET were seen in frontal cortical regions after chronic DBS at the VC/VS target. The first use of DBS in AD at a frontal lobe behavior regulation target (VC/VS) was well-tolerated and revealed less performance decline in CDR-SB. Frontal network modulation to improve executive and behavioral deficits should be furthered studied in AD.

Motor performance differentiates individuals with Lewy body dementia, Parkinson's and Alzheimer's disease.

INTRODUCTION: Differential diagnosis of dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), Parkinson's disease with dementia (PDD), Parkinson's disease (PD) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) is challenging. Comparative motor profiles of these neurodegenerative disorders may aid in earlier diagnosis but have not been extensively studied. METHODS: Groups were rigorously matched by age, education, and sex. DLB/PDD participants were matched by Mini-Mental State Examination Score to individuals with AD and by Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor scores to individuals with PD. Gait, balance, dual task walking and hand dexterity measures were compared between a combined group (n=21) of individuals with Lewy body dementia (LBD) consisting of those with DLB (n=11) and PDD (n=10) to individuals with PD (n=21) or AD (n=21). RESULTS: Individuals at the same disease stage with LBD walked significantly slower with shorter stride lengths (p<0.05), demonstrated poorer balance on both the Tinetti and Berg Balance Scale, and poorer performance on dual-task and figure-of-eight walking compared to PD and AD (p<0.05 for all) groups. Upper extremity coordination on the 9-hole peg test differentiated LBD from both PD and AD and was the only motor test in which individuals with AD performed worse than those with PD. Tinetti balance subscores were significantly lower in PDD compared to DLB participants (10.4±2.3 versus 12.8±2.3; p=0.027). CONCLUSIONS: Motor features distinguish individuals with LBD from those with AD and PD. Measures of gait, balance and finger dexterity provide an additional means of differentiating individuals with LBD from those with AD and PD.

Paired Studies Comparing Clinical Profiles of Lewy Body Dementia with Alzheimer's and Parkinson's Diseases.

Limited data compares clinical profiles of Lewy Body Dementia (LBD) with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Parkinson's disease (PD). Twenty-one mildly demented ambulatory LBD subjects were individually matched by MMSE score with 21 AD subjects and by UPDRS motor score with 21 PD subjects. Matched by age, gender, education, and race, pairs were compared using cognitive, functional, behavioral, and motor measures. LBD group performed worse than PD on axial motor, gait, and balance measures. AD had more amnesia and orientation impairments, but less executive and visuospatial deficits than LBD subjects. LBD group had more sleepiness, cognitive/behavioral fluctuations, hallucinations, and sleep apnea than AD or PD. Axial motor, gait, and balance disturbances correlated with executive, visuospatial, and global cognition deficits. LBD is differentiated from AD and PD by retrieval memory, visuospatial, and executive deficits; axial motor, gait and balance impairments; sleepiness, cognitive/behavioral fluctuations, hallucinations, and sleep apnea.

Successful subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation therapy after significant lead displacement from a subdural hematoma.

A 57-year-old man with a 21 year history of Parkinson's disease underwent bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (DBS) placement. One week postoperatively he developed an acute left subdural hematoma from a fall with significant displacement of the DBS leads. It was promptly evacuated, the patient slowly recovered neurologically, and the leads again moved near to the original position. Six months of stimulation therapy attained 50% reduction in symptoms. This case report demonstrates the movement of DBS leads due to brain shift and their ability to come back to previous location once the brain shift is corrected.