Appendectomy as part of Ladd's procedure: a systematic review and survey analysis.

BACKGROUND: Ladd's Procedure has been the surgical intervention of choice in the management of congenital intestinal malrotation for the past century. Historically, the procedure included performing an appendectomy to prevent future misdiagnosis of appendicitis, since the location of the appendix will be shifted to the left side of the abdomen. This study consists of two parts. A review of the available literature on appendectomy as part of Ladd's procedure and then a survey sent to pediatric surgeons about their approach (to remove the appendix or not) while performing a Ladd's procedure and the clinical reasoning behind their approach. METHODS: The study consists of 2 parts: (1) a systematic review was performed to extract articles that fulfill the inclusion criteria; (2) a short online survey was designed and sent by email to 168 pediatric surgeons. The questions in the survey were centered on whether a surgeon performs an appendectomy as part of the Ladd's procedure or not, as well as their reasoning behind either choice. RESULTS: The literature search yielded five articles, the data from the available literature are inconsistent with performing appendectomy as part of Ladd's procedure. The challenge of leaving the appendix in place has been briefly described with minimal to no focus on the clinical reasoning. The survey demonstrated that 102 responses were received (60% response rate). Ninety pediatric surgeons stated performing an appendectomy as part of the procedure (88%). Only 12% of pediatric surgeons are not performing appendectomy during Ladd's procedure. CONCLUSION: It is difficult to implement a modification in a successful procedure like Ladd's procedure. The majority of pediatric surgeons perform an appendectomy as part of its original description. This study has identified gaps in the literature pertaining to analyze the outcomes of performing Ladd's procedure without an appendectomy which should be explored in future research.

Bisphenol A and Male Infertility: Role of Oxidative Stress.

Bisphenol A (BPA) is an endocrine-disrupting chemical that is capable of mimicking, antagonizing, and interfering with the normal biological functioning of the endocrine system. BPA is used in diverse industries, hence its vast sources of exposure. Although the half-life of BPA is relatively short (<24 hours), studies have reported its detection in the urine of different populations. It, therefore, became important to investigate its effect on general health, including male reproductive health. The adverse effects of BPA on male fertility have been evaluated and reported from both in vivo and in vitro studies. Up to date, reports from randomized controlled trials remain controversial, as some revealed decreased sperm quality, sperm concentration, and total sperm count, while others reported that no adverse effect was seen after exposure. Findings from animal model studies and in vitro experiments have shown that exposure to BPA led to a reduction in sperm quality and increased sperm DNA fragmentation, and some even revealed altered expression of the gene that encodes gonadotropin-releasing hormone. This shows that BPA not only may adversely affect male fertility by acting as an endocrine disruptor but also can potentially impact male fertility via its possible contribution to oxidative stress. Therefore, this book chapter aims to identify and elucidate the effect of BPA exposure on male fertility, and to as well illustrate the mechanisms through which this occurs, while emphasizing the role of oxidative stress as a potential pathway.

Isolated scrotal lymphedema in a 43-year old male patient: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Lymphedema of the external genitalia is a rare condition characterized by swelling of the scrotal skin and subcutaneous tissue, resulting from a pathology in lymphatic drainage. Over time, the development of fibrosis leads to a considerable impairment in the patient's quality of life. While conservative management is generally the first-line approach, surgical cases may necessitate surgical intervention to achieve comprehensive and lasting improvements. CASE PRESENTATION: We present the case of a 43-year-old obese male patient who presented to the clinic with a complaint of persistent bilateral scrotal swelling for three months. Clinical examination revealed a pressure-indolent, soft, and massively enlarged swelling of the scrotum on both sides. Ultrasound findings confirmed a diffusely thickened edematous scrotal wall. The patient was advised to start physiotherapy and adhere to conservative management. Due to the debilitating size of the mass, the patient opted for excision of the scrotal swelling followed by scrotoplasty. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: This case report explores the presentation, signs and symptoms, impact on patients' lives, and various management options for scrotal lymphedema. It underscores the intricacies involved in the diagnosis and treatment decision-making process, emphasizing the need for a tailored and multidisciplinary approach. CONCLUSION: It is imperative to initially rule out life-threatening causes of scrotal lymphedema to ensure optimal patient care. The integration of surgical interventions should be carefully considered in the overall management strategy for optimal and comprehensive results. Scrotoplasty, in the context of scrotal lymphedema, not only improves the quality of life but also positively influences sexual function. COMPETENCIES: Interpersonal and communication skills, Medical knowledge, Patient care, Practice-based learning and improvement.

Impact of Bilateral versus Single Internal Thoracic Artery Grafting on the Long-Term Survival in Adults: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the survival of patients who had undergone bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting versus those with single internal thoracic artery grafting from the available literature. Moreover, this study will review the available literature regarding which of the two techniques seems to be the safest with long-term survival and reduced mortality rates. METHODS: A literature search of the databases was conducted to retrieve studies that fall under the study design of cohort and randomized controlled clinical trials in English from January 2015 to July 2021. Finally, seven studies were selected: four cohort studies and three other from a randomized trial. RESULTS: The cohort studies revealed that bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting is associated with lower mortality rates and better long-term survival outcomes than single internal thoracic artery grafting, while the ART randomized controlled clinical trials showed that there is no significant difference in mortality rates between both the coronary artery bypass grafting techniques. However, all studies concluded that bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting is associated with a higher frequency of deep sternal wound infections. CONCLUSION: The discrepancy in results between the cohort studies and randomized controlled clinical trial remains persistent. However, the stated advantages of bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting are not strong enough to convince surgeons to alter their practice and the wide magnitude of expectations from the ART study was reckoned as inadequate. This may well be due to the presence of limited criteria for bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting in identifying the impact on survival of extended arterial revascularization, and there is a new colossal expectation from the ongoing randomized trial based on multiple arterial grafting versus single arterial grafting.