Characteristics and treatment results of patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in a tertiary care centre.

BACKGROUND: Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NET) are rare neoplasms with limited reported data from the Middle East. Our study aims to report the clinicopathological feature, treatment patterns, and survival outcomes of patients with GEP-NET from our part of the world. METHODS: Medical records of patients diagnosed with GEP-NET between January 2011 and December 2016 at a single center in Saudi Arabia were reviewed retrospectively, and complete clinicopathological and treatment data were collected. Patients' survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: A total of 72 patients were identified with a median age of 51 years (range 27-82) and male-to-female ratio of (1.1). The most common tumor location was the pancreas (29.1%), followed by small bowel (25%), stomach (12.5%), rectum (8.3%), colon (8.3%), and appendix (6.9%). Forty-one patients (57%) had well-differentiated grade (G)1, 21 (29%) had G2, and 4 (6%) had G3. In five patients, the pathology was neuroendocrine carcinoma and in one it could not be classified. 54.2% of the patients were metastatic at diagnosis. Forty-two patients underwent surgical resection as primary management while 26 underwent systemic therapy, three patients were put on active surveillance, and one was treated endoscopically with polypectomy. The 5-year overall survival and progression-free survivals were 77.2% and 49%, respectively, for the whole group. Patients with G1 and 2 disease, lower Ki-67 index, and surgically treated as primary management had significantly better survival outcomes. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that the most common tumor locations are similar to western reported data. However, there seems to be a higher incidence of metastatic disease at presentation than in the rest of the world.

Prognostic significance of peritoneal metastasis from colorectal cancer treated with first-line triplet chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Peritoneal metastasis from colorectal cancer (CRC) carries a poor prognosis in most studies. The majority of those studies used either a single-agent or doublet chemotherapy regimen in the first-line setting. AIM: To investigate the prognostic significance of peritoneal metastasis in a cohort of patients treated with triplet chemotherapy in the first-line setting. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in 51 patients with metastatic CRC treated in a prospective clinical trial with capecitabine, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and bevacizumab in the first-line setting according to the presence and absence of peritoneal metastasis. Furthermore, univariate and multivariate analyses for PFS and OS were performed to assess the prognostic significance of peritoneal metastasis at the multivariate level. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients were treated with the above triplet therapy. Fifteen had peritoneal metastasis. The patient characteristics of both groups showed a significant difference in the sidedness of the primary tumor (left-sided primary tumor in 60% of the peritoneal group vs 86% in the nonperitoneal group, P = 0.03) and the presence of liver metastasis (40% for the peritoneal group vs 75% for the nonperitoneal group, P = 0.01). Univariate analysis for PFS showed a statistically significant difference for age less than 65 years (P = 0.034), presence of liver metastasis (P = 0.046), lung metastasis (P = 0.011), and those who underwent metastasectomy (P = 0.001). Only liver metastasis and metastasectomy were statistically significant for OS, with P values of 0.001 and 0.002, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that age (less than 65 years) and metastasectomy were statistically significant for PFS, with P values of 0.002 and 0.001, respectively. On the other hand, the absence of liver metastasis and metastasectomy were statistically significant for OS, with P values of 0.003 and 0.005, respectively. CONCLUSION: Peritoneal metastasis in patients with metastatic CRC treated with first-line triple chemotherapy does not carry prognostic significance at univariate and multivariate levels. Confirmatory larger studies are warranted.

Thromboembolic Events Burden in Patients With Solid Tumors and Their Predisposing Factors.

INTRODUCTION: The relationship between cancers and thromboembolic events is well established. In our study, we aim to determine the burden of thromboembolic events in patients with solid tumors and identify the risk factors related to their development. MATERIALS & METHODS: Data on patients with solid tumors and thromboembolism between January 2013 and September 2014 were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: During the study period 174 patients were identified. Of which, 172 (98.9%) had venous thrombus embolism, 137 (79%) were diagnosed with deep vein thromboses, 67 (38.5%) with pulmonary embolism, 84 (48.3%) were symptomatic and 90 (51.7) were incidental at diagnosis. The most common patients and disease characteristics were female sex, high body mass index (BMI), metastatic stage, colorectal and breast primaries, and anti-neoplastic therapy. CONCLUSION:  Our study confirmed the high burden of thromboembolic events in cancer patients and the relevant factors associated with its development.