Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 31(7): 1261-1274, 2022 07 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35545293

RESUMEN

This review aims to develop an appropriate review tool for systematically collating metabolites that are dysregulated in disease and applies the method to identify novel diagnostic biomarkers for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Studies that analyzed metabolites in blood or urine samples where HCC was compared with comparison groups (healthy, precirrhotic liver disease, cirrhosis) were eligible. Tumor tissue was included to help differentiate primary and secondary biomarkers. Searches were conducted on Medline and EMBASE. A bespoke "risk of bias" tool for metabolomic studies was developed adjusting for analytic quality. Discriminant metabolites for each sample type were ranked using a weighted score accounting for the direction and extent of change and the risk of bias of the reporting publication. A total of 84 eligible studies were included in the review (54 blood, 9 urine, and 15 tissue), with six studying multiple sample types. High-ranking metabolites, based on their weighted score, comprised energy metabolites, bile acids, acylcarnitines, and lysophosphocholines. This new review tool addresses an unmet need for incorporating quality of study design and analysis to overcome the gaps in standardization of reporting of metabolomic data. Validation studies, standardized study designs, and publications meeting minimal reporting standards are crucial for advancing the field beyond exploratory studies.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Biomarcadores , Biomarcadores de Tumor , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/diagnóstico , Humanos , Cirrosis Hepática , Metabolómica/métodos
2.
World J Hepatol ; 11(6): 542-552, 2019 Jun 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31293722

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: An ideal staging system for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) should rely on the hepatic reserve function and tumor burden. With the improvement in diagnostic and treatment strategies for HCC, in addition to recent treatment of viral hepatitis, finding a suitable assessment tool for hepatic reserve has become mandatory. AIM: To validate a recently proposed modified albumin-bilirubin-TNM (mALBI-T) grade as a prognostic model for patients with HCC in Egypt. METHODS: For patients diagnosed with HCC, Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage, albumin-bilirubin (ALBI), plateltet-albumin-bilirubin (PALBI), ALBI-based BCLC, ALBI-T and mALBI-T grades were estimated. Patients were followed from time of diagnosis to date of death or date of data collection if they remained alive. Overall survival and received treatments were determined. Survival data were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 1910 patients were included (mean age, 57 years; 1575 males). At presentation, 50.6% had CTP A, 36.1% had CTP B and 13.4 % had CTP C; 12% had ALBI grade 1, 62.3% had ALBI grade 2 and 24.7% had ALBI grade 3. Overall median survival was 13 mo; survival was better in patients with ALBI 1 than in those with ALBI 2 and 3 (28.6 vs 14 and 5.8 mo, respectively, P < 0.001). Patients with ALBI-T grades 0 and 1 had better survival than those with ALBI-T grades 2, 3, 4 and 5 (P < 0.001). The modified ALBI-T showed better stratification and significant improvement in prediction of survival. CONCLUSION: ALBI-T grade is a superior prognostic tool that selects patients with HCC who have better liver reservoir and tumor stage. mALBI-T is a better prognostic model in patients with HCC.

3.
Int J Gen Med ; 10: 431-442, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29225478

RESUMEN

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common malignancy, the third most common cause of cancer death, and the most common primary liver cancer. Overall, there is a need for more reliable biomarkers for HCC, as those currently available lack sensitivity and specificity. For example, the current gold-standard biomarker, serum alpha-fetoprotein, has a sensitivity of roughly only 70%. Cancer cells have different characteristic metabolic signatures in biofluids, compared to healthy cells; therefore, metabolite analysis in blood or urine should lead to the detection of suitable candidates for the detection of HCC. With the advent of metabonomics, this has increased the potential for new biomarker discovery. In this article, we look at approaches used to identify biomarkers of HCC using proton nuclear magnetic resonance (1H-NMR) spectroscopy of urine samples. The various multivariate statistical analysis techniques used are explained, and the process of biomarker identification is discussed, with a view to simplifying the knowledge base for the average clinician.

4.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev ; 16(16): 6929-34, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26514470

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Real life management of hepatocellular carcinoma occasionally deviates from guidelines for recommended therapy. AIMS: To evaluate how frequent this deviation happens in our center and assess its impact on outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The treatment of 770 patients (87% males, mean age 57.8 years) was analyzed and the effect of deviation on outcome over 36 months was examined. RESULTS: Of Barcelona Clinic liver cancer stages 0 and A patients, 65.8% received resection, ablation, liver transplantation or transarterial chemoembolisation for unresectable tumors more than 5 cm in diameter, and 34.2% received treatment recommended for later stages. Of stage B patients, 62.2% received recommended therapy, 34.3% of patients received supportive therapy or sorafenib and 3.5% received upward treatment stage migration. Among stage C patients, 7.6% received sorafenib, and most (79.2%) were given supportive care. Deviation from recommended therapy occurred in 34.2%, 37.7%, and 92.4% in stages 0-A, B and C. Survival of stage 0-A patients who received downwards treatment stage migration was lower than those who received recommended treatment (p <0.001). Upward treatment stage migration in stages B, C and D did not improve survival compared to those who received recommended treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Deviation from recommended therapy had a negative impact on survival in Barcelona Clinic liver cancer stage A patients.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patología , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Ablación por Catéter , Quimioembolización Terapéutica , Egipto , Femenino , Hepatectomía , Humanos , Trasplante de Hígado , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Niacinamida/análogos & derivados , Niacinamida/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Fenilurea/uso terapéutico , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Estudios Prospectivos , Sorafenib , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA