Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy improves renal transplant candidacy and posttransplant outcomes in morbidly obese patients.

Morbid obesity is a barrier to kidney transplantation due to inferior outcomes, including higher rates of new-onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT), delayed graft function (DGF), and graft failure. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) increases transplant eligibility by reducing BMI in kidney transplant candidates, but the effect of surgical weight loss on posttransplantation outcomes is unknown. Reviewing single-center medical records, we identified all patients who underwent LSG before kidney transplantation from 2011-2016 (n = 20). Post-LSG kidney recipients were compared with similar-BMI recipients who did not undergo LSG, using 2:1 direct matching for patient factors. McNemar's test and signed-rank test were used to compare groups. Among post-LSG patients, mean BMI ± standard deviation (SD) was 41.5 ± 4.4 kg/m2 at initial encounter, which decreased to 32.3 ± 2.9 kg/m2 prior to transplantation (P < .01). No complications, readmissions, or mortality occurred following LSG. After transplantation, one patient (5%) experienced DGF, and no patients experienced NODAT. Allograft and patient survival at 1-year posttransplantation was 100%. Compared with non-LSG patients, post-LSG recipients had lower rates of DGF (5% vs 20%) and renal dysfunction-related readmissions (10% vs 27.5%) (P < .05 each). Perioperative complications, allograft survival, and patient survival were similar between groups. These data suggest that morbidly obese patients with end-stage renal disease who undergo LSG to improve transplant candidacy, achieve excellent posttransplantation outcomes.

A Steady-State Head-to-Head Pharmacokinetic Comparison of All FK-506 (Tacrolimus) Formulations (ASTCOFF): An Open-Label, Prospective, Randomized, Two-Arm, Three-Period Crossover Study.

This two-sequence, three-period crossover study is the first pharmacokinetic (PK) study to compare all three innovator formulations of tacrolimus (twice-daily immediate-release tacrolimus capsules [IR-Tac]; once-daily extended-release tacrolimus capsules [ER-Tac]; novel once-daily tacrolimus tablets [LCPT]). Stable renal transplant patients were dosed with each drug for 7 days, and blood samples were obtained over 24 h. Thirty subjects were included in the PK analysis set. A conversion factor of 1:1:0.80 for IR-Tac:ER-Tac:LCPT was used; no dose adjustments were permitted during the study. The median (interquartile range) total daily dose was 6.0 (4.0-8.0) mg for IR-Tac and ER-Tac and 4.8 (3.3-6.3) for LCPT. Significantly higher exposure on a per milligram basis, lower intraday fluctuation and prolonged time (Tmax ) to peak concentration (Cmax ) were found for LCPT versus IR-Tac or ER-Tac. ER-Tac showed no differences versus IR-Tac in exposure, Cmax , Tmax or fluctuation. The observed exposure of IR-Tac was used to normalize exposure for LCPT and ER-Tac, resulting in the following recommended total daily dose conversion rates: IR-Tac:ER-Tac, +8%; IR-Tac:LCPT, -30%; ER-Tac:LCPT, -36%. After exposure normalization, Cmax was ~17% lower for LCPT than for IR-Tac or ER-Tac; Cmin was ~6% lower for LCPT compared with IR-Tac and 3% higher compared with ER-Tac.

Developing New Immunosuppression for the Next Generation of Transplant Recipients: The Path Forward.

The development of new immunosuppressive drugs has slowed markedly over the past several years, and the outlook that improved therapy will be available to the next generation of transplant recipients is bleak. In this viewpoint, the authors outline some of important barriers to new drug development and suggest specific steps that the transplant community can take to overcome them.

Prospective iterative trial of proteasome inhibitor-based desensitization.

A prospective iterative trial of proteasome inhibitor (PI)-based therapy for reducing HLA antibody (Ab) levels was conducted in five phases differing in bortezomib dosing density and plasmapheresis timing. Phases included 1 or 2 bortezomib cycles (1.3 mg/m(2) × 6-8 doses), one rituximab dose and plasmapheresis. HLA Abs were measured by solid phase and flow cytometry (FCM) assays. Immunodominant Ab (iAb) was defined as highest HLA Ab level. Forty-four patients received 52 desensitization courses (7 patients enrolled in multiple phases): Phase 1 (n = 20), Phase 2 (n = 12), Phase 3 (n = 10), Phase 4 (n = 5), Phase 5 (n = 5). iAb reductions were observed in 38 of 44 (86%) patients and persisted up to 10 months. In Phase 1, a 51.5% iAb reduction was observed at 28 days with bortezomib alone. iAb reductions increased with higher bortezomib dosing densities and included class I, II, and public antigens (HLA DRß3, HLA DRß4 and HLA DRß5). FCM median channel shifts decreased in 11/11 (100%) patients by a mean of 103 ± 54 mean channel shifts (log scale). Nineteen out of 44 patients (43.2%) were transplanted with low acute rejection rates (18.8%) and de novo DSA formation (12.5%). In conclusion, PI-based desensitization consistently and durably reduces HLA Ab levels providing an alternative to intravenous immune globulin-based desensitization.

Addressing morbid obesity as a barrier to renal transplantation with laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

Morbid obesity is a barrier to renal transplantation and is inadequately addressed by medical therapy. We present results of a prospective evaluation of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) for patients failing to achieve significant weight loss with medical therapy. Over a 25-month period, 52 obese renal transplant candidates meeting NIH guidelines for metabolic surgery underwent LSG. Mean age was 50.0 ± 10.0 years with an average preoperative BMI of 43.0 ± 5.4 kg/m(2) (range 35.8-67.7 kg/m(2)). Follow-up after LSG was 220 ± 152 days (range 26-733 days) with last BMI of 36.3 ± 5.3 kg/m(2) (range 29.2-49.8 kg/m(2)) with 29 (55.8%) patients achieving goal BMI of <35 kg/m(2) at 92 ± 92 days (range 13-420 days). The mean percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) was 32.1 ± 17.6% (range 6.7-93.8%). A segmented regression model was used to compare medical therapy versus LSG. This revealed a statistically significant increase in the BMI reduction rate (0.3 kg/m(2)/month versus 1.1 kg/m(2)/month, p < 0.0001). Patients also experienced a 40.9% decrease in anti-hypertensive medications (p < 0.001) and a 49.7% decrease in total daily insulin dose (p < 0.001). LSG is a safe and effective means for addressing obesity in kidney transplant candidates in the context of a multidisciplinary approach.

Randomized controlled pilot study of B cell-targeted induction therapy in HLA sensitized kidney transplant recipients.

Optimal induction regimens for patients at high risk for antibody and/or cell-mediated rejection have not been established. This pilot, prospective, randomized study evaluated addition of B cell/plasma cell-targeting agents to T cell-based induction with rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) in high immunologic risk renal transplant recipients. Patients were randomized to induction with rATG, rATG + rituximab, rATG + bortezomib or rATG + rituximab + bortezomib. Inclusion criteria were: (1) current cytotoxic panel reactive antibody (PRA) ≥20% or peak cytotoxic PRA ≥50% or (2) T or B cell positive flow crossmatch with donor-specific antibody (DSA) or (3) historical positive serologic or cytotoxic crossmatch or DSA to donor or (4) prior allograft loss with more than one acute rejection. Median overall follow-up was 496 days: 1-year and overall acute rejection were 25% and 27.5%, and 25% of patients developed de novo DSA within 1 year. One-year and overall patient survival were 97.5% and 92.5%, and 1-year and overall death-censored allograft survival were 97.5% and 95%. Renal allograft function posttransplant was similar among all arms. Eight of nine cases of peripheral neuropathy were mild, whereas one case was moderate and required a narcotic prescription. In conclusion, addition of rituximab and/or bortezomib to rATG induction has an acceptable safety/toxicity profile in a high immunologic risk renal transplant population.

A randomized, crossover pharmacokinetic study comparing generic tacrolimus vs. the reference formulation in subpopulations of kidney transplant patients.

An exploratory, post hoc analysis was performed using data from a prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized, two-period (14 d per period), two-sequence, crossover, steady-state pharmacokinetic study comparing generic tacrolimus (Sandoz) vs. reference tacrolimus in stable renal transplant patients receiving their pre-study twice-daily dose. Pharmacokinetic parameters were compared in 68 patients according to gender, African American ethnicity, the presence or absence of diabetes, and use of steroids. The ratios of tacrolimus AUC0-12 h , Cmax , and C12 with generic vs. reference tacrolimus were calculated using the geometric mean (GM) of dose-normalized values at days 14 and 28. Mean (SD) tacrolimus dose at baseline was 5.7 (4.2) mg/d. There were no consistent differences in dose-normalized AUC0-12 h , C12 , Cmax, or tmax between the generic and reference preparations within subpopulations. The 90% confidence intervals (CI) for the ratios of dose-normalized AUC0-12 h and C12 with generic vs. reference tacrolimus were within 80-125% for all subpopulations, as were 90% CIs for Cmax other than for females, African Americans, and non-diabetics, which is not unexpected given the wide variability of tacrolimus Cmax and the small subpopulation sizes. These exploratory results suggest that this generic tacrolimus preparation would be expected to offer comparable bioavailability to the reference drug in these patient subpopulations.

A randomized pharmacokinetic study of generic tacrolimus versus reference tacrolimus in kidney transplant recipients.

Pharmacokinetic analyses comparing generic tacrolimus preparations versus the reference drug in kidney transplant patients are lacking. A prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized, two-period (14 days per period), two-sequence, crossover and steady-state pharmacokinetic study was undertaken to compare twice-daily generic tacrolimus (Sandoz) versus reference tacrolimus (Prograf®) in stable renal transplant patients. AUC(0-12h) and peak concentration (C(max) ) were calculated from 12 h pharmacokinetic profiles at the end of each period (days 14 and 28). Of 71 patients enrolled, 68 provided evaluable pharmacokinetic data. The ratios of geometric means were 1.02 (90% CI 97-108%, p = 0.486) for AUC(0-12h) and 1.09 (90% CI 101-118%, p = 0.057) for C(max) . Mean (SD) C(0) was 7.3(1.8) ng/mL for generic tacrolimus versus 7.0(2.1) ng/mL for reference tacrolimus based on data from days 14 and 28. Correlations between 12 h trough levels and AUC were r = 0.917 for generic tacrolimus and r = 0.887 for reference drug at day 28. These data indicate that generic tacrolimus (Sandoz) has a similar pharmacokinetic profile to the reference drug and is bioequivalent in kidney transplant recipients according to US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency guidelines.

Evolution of the role of the transplant pharmacist on the multidisciplinary transplant team.

Transplant pharmacists have been recognized as an essential part of the transplant team by their colleagues along with several governing and professional organizations. The specific education, training and responsibilities of the transplant pharmacist have not been clearly delineated in the literature. Various pharmacists across the country have been called upon to serve on the transplant team necessitating standardization of their fundamental and desirable activities. Therefore, the purpose of this manuscript is to describe the training and role of a transplant pharmacist on the patient care team and provide a roadmap to implementation of novel transplant pharmacy services.

Proteasome inhibitor therapy for antibody-mediated rejection.

AMR is being recognized with increasing efficiency, but continues to present a significant threat to renal allograft survival. Traditional therapies for AMR (IVIG, plasmapheresis, rituximab, and antilymphocyte preparations) in general have provided inconsistent results and do not deplete the source of antibody production, viz., the mature plasma cell. Recently, the first plasma cell-targeted therapy in humans has been developed using bortezomib (a first in class PI) for AMR treatment in kidney transplant recipients. Initial experience with bortezomib involved treatment of refractory AMR. Subsequently, the efficacy of bortezomib in primary therapy for AMR was demonstrated. In a multicenter collaborative effort, the initial results with bortezomib in AMR have been confirmed and expanded to pediatric and adult heart transplant recipients. More recently, results from a prospective, staged desensitization trial has shown that bortezomib alone can substantially reduce anti-HLA antibody levels. These results demonstrate the significant potential of proteasome inhibition in addressing humoral barriers. However, the major advantage of proteasome inhibition lies in the numerous potential strategies for achieving synergy.

Reducing de novo donor-specific antibody levels during acute rejection diminishes renal allograft loss.

The effect of de novo DSA detected at the time of acute cellular rejection (ACR) and the response of DSA levels to rejection therapy on renal allograft survival were analyzed. Kidney transplant patients with acute rejection underwent DSA testing at rejection diagnosis with DSA levels quantified using Luminex single-antigen beads. Fifty-two patients experienced acute rejection with 16 (31%) testing positive for de novo DSA. Median follow-up was 27.0 +/- 17.4 months postacute rejection. Univariate analysis of factors influencing allograft survival demonstrated significance for African American race, DGF, cytotoxic PRA >20% (current) and/or >50% (peak), de novo DSA, C4d and repeat transplantation. Multivariate analysis showed only de novo DSA (6.6-fold increased allograft loss risk, p = 0.017) to be significant. Four-year allograft survival was higher with ACR (without DSA) (100%) than mixed acute rejection (ACR with DSA/C4d) (65%) or antibody-mediated rejection (35%) (p < 0.001). Patients with >50% reduction in DSA within 14 days experienced higher allograft survival (p = 0.039). De novo DSAs detected at rejection are associated with reduced allograft survival, but prompt DSA reduction was associated with improved allograft survival. DSA should be considered a potential new end point for rejection therapy.

Proteasome inhibition reduces donor-specific antibody levels.

BACKGROUND: Current antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) therapies (intravenous immunoglobulin, apheresis, rituximab, polyclonal antibodies) do not target the primary antibody producing B cells, that is, the plasma cell. We report the preliminary results from the first clinical experience with plasma cell targeted therapy with bortezomib. Bortezomib is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of plasma cell tumors (multiple myeloma). METHODS: Kidney transplant patients with mixed acute cellular rejection (ACR) and AMR episodes (by Banff '97 criteria, update 2005) were treated with bortezomib (1.3 mg/m(2) per dose x 4) at standard labeled doses. Patients were monitored by serial donor specific anti-HLA antibody (DSA) determinations [Luminex/Labscreen beads] and quantified by conversion to fluorescence intensity to molecules of equivalent soluble fluorescence (MESF). RESULTS: Five patients were treated with bortezomib. Each patient also had coexisting ACR. In each case, bortezomib treatment led to prompt ACR and AMR rejection reversal. DSA levels decreased significantly in all patients (except 1 patient who had short follow-up). Observed toxicities from bortezomib included a transient grade III thrombocytopenia (1 patient) and mild-to-moderate nausea, vomiting, and/or diarrhea (3/5 patients). Opportunistic infections were not observed. CONCLUSIONS: Bortezomib therapy provides effective reduction in DSA levels with long-term suppression. These preliminary results indicate that proteasome inhibition provides an effective means for reducing HLA antibody levels in transplant recipients.

Eculizumab and Belatacept for De Novo Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome Associated With CFHR3-CFHR1 Deletion in a Kidney Transplant Recipient: A Case Report.

BACKGROUND: Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality and occurs due to genetic or acquired abnormalities that result in the dysregulation of the alternative complement pathway. CASE REPORT: We report a case of post-living kidney transplantation de novo aHUS in a setting of heterozygous deletion in the complement factor H-related protein (CFHR)3-CFHR1 gene. The aHUS episode was possibly triggered by antibody-mediated rejection or tacrolimus. The patient responded well to eculizumab and substituting belatacept for tacrolimus. Her serum creatinine level was stable at 1.5 mg/dL after 2.5 years of follow-up. CONCLUSION: This case highlights the success of using a strategy that combines eculizumab and belatacept, as an alternative to calcineurin inhibitors, in treating aHUS in a patient with heterozygous deletion in the CFHR3-CFHR1 gene.

Risk factors and outcomes analyses at 36 months of a prospective, randomized, multicenter, trial of daclizumab induction in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant recipients.

UNLABELLED: The purpose of this study was to analyze risk factors for acute rejection (AR) and long-term outcomes in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant (SKPT) patients enrolled in a prospective, multicenter study of daclizumab (DAC) versus no antibody induction. METHODS: A total of 298 SKPT patients were randomized into three groups and categorized based on an intent to treat analysis, and factors associated with AR and survival were identified using logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: There were no differences in patient or allograft survival or rejection rates among the three groups at 36 months follow-up. Delayed (kidney) graft function (DGF) was a risk factor for subsequent kidney AR (odds ratio = 2.79, P = .002). The presence of kidney AR was also a risk factor (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.1, P = .003) for kidney graft loss, whereas risk factors for pancreas graft loss (censored for graft loss within 30 days or death with functioning graft) included pancreas AR (HR = 1.97, P = .012), kidney AR (HR = 1.61, P = .042), CMV serostatus donor +/recipient - (HR = 1.62, P = .026), and HLA-B mismatch (HR = 1.58, P = .01). Kidney graft loss (HR = 5.5, P = .02) was the only predictor of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: At 36 months, no significant differences in outcomes were noted in the three study groups. DGF was the major risk factor for kidney AR, kidney AR was the major risk factor for kidney graft loss, and kidney graft loss was the major determinant of mortality. Prevention of kidney DGF and AR in SKPT recipients may play a pivotal role in optimizing long-term outcomes.

A prospective, randomized, multicenter study evaluating the safety and efficacy of two dosing regimens of daclizumab compared to no antibody induction in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation: results at 3 years.

UNLABELLED: This is a report of outcomes at 36 months of a prospective, multicenter study comparing the safety and efficacy of two dosing regimens of daclizumab with no antibody induction in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant (SKPT) patients receiving tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone. A total of 298 SKPT patients were randomized into one of three groups: daclizumab 1 mg/kg/dose every 14 days for 5 doses (group 1, n = 107); daclizumab 2 mg/kg/dose for 2 doses (group 2, n = 113); and no antibody induction (group 3, n = 78). There were no differences in baseline characteristics among the three groups, and results were analyzed by an intent-to-treat analysis. The incidence of composite events (acute rejection [AR], any allograft lost, or death) at 3 years was 49%, 43%, and 55% in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (P = .278). The cumulative incidences of AR were not statistically different among the three groups (P = .178). The mean time to first AR was delayed in groups 2 (288 days) and 1 (245 days) compared to group 3 (145 days, P = .07). There were no differences in patient or allograft survival rates among the three groups, and the rates of serious adverse events, infections, and hospital readmissions were also comparable. Excellent dual graft function in patients with surviving grafts was observed in all three groups at 3 years. CONCLUSIONS: The alternative 2-dose regimen of daclizumab was as safe and effective as the conventional 5-dose regimen compared to no antibody induction in SKPT patients, but no long-term benefits were noted.

Impact of the metabolic syndrome on long-term outcomes in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation.

The metabolic syndrome (MS) has been implicated as an important nonimmunologic risk factor for chronic renal transplant dysfunction. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of the MS on outcomes in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation (SKPT). Data were available on 241 patients enrolled in a prospective, multicenter randomized study of daclizumab compared with no antibody induction in SKPT. Presence of MS before and after SKPT was defined using NCEP-ATP III (National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III) criteria. Body mass index (BMI) was used as a surrogate for waist circumference. MS was present in 59% of patients pretransplantation but only in 19% of patients 1 year after SKPT (P < .0001). Demographic and transplant characteristics were well matched for those with MS (MS+) and without MS (MS-) at 1 year. Presence of MS at 1 year was associated with the following changes at 3 years: increased serum creatinine level (1.65 mg/dL MS- vs 2.05 mg/dL MS+; P = .13); decreased modification of diet in renal disease calculated glomerular filtration rate (GFR; 58 mL/min MS- vs 48 mL/min MS+; P = .02); increased HgbA1C level (5.6% MS- vs 6.6% MS+; P < .001); and lower pancreas graft (PG) survival rate (88% MS- vs 71% MS+; P = .01). Linear regression analysis identified MS+ and the subgroup of MS+ without functioning PG at 1 year as independent risk factors for renal dysfunction, whereas MS+ with functioning PG at 1 year was not a risk factor for renal dysfunction. Presence of MS at 1 year is associated with long-term renal dysfunction after SKPT. Efforts to decrease early PG failure may help mitigate against MS-associated renal dysfunction.

Inferior late functional and metabolic outcomes in African American simultaneous kidney-pancreas recipients.

The aim of this study was to determine the impact of ethnicity on the major endpoints of a prospective, multi-center, randomized trial of 2 dosing regimens of daclizumab compared with no antibody induction in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation (SKPT). A total of 298 patients were randomized into 3 groups: daclizumab 1 mg/kg/dose every 14 days for 5 doses (Group I, n = 107), daclizumab 2 mg/kg/dose every 14 days for 2 doses (Group II, n = 113), and no antibody induction (Group III, n = 78). All patients received tacrolimus (TAC), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and steroids. Thirty-seven patients (12.4%) were African American (AA) and 261 were non-African American (NAA). Demographic and transplant characteristics were comparable between AA and NAA patients. At 3 years, there were no differences in patient, kidney, or pancreas graft survival rates. Rejection rate was similar between AA and NAA. Although mean serum creatinine (SCr) levels at 1 year were comparable between AA and NAA patients (AA 1.5 mg/dL vs NAA 1.3 mg/dL; P = .23), by 3 years AA patients had higher mean SCr levels (AA 2.1 mg/dL vs NAA 1.5 mg/dL; P < .0001) and lower calculated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (AA 45 mL/min vs NAA 56 mL/min; P = .01). Mean HgbA1C, total cholesterol, and diastolic blood pressure (BP) were higher in AA patients at 3 years, compared with NAA patients. In conclusion, in this study, AA patients had worse late functional and metabolic outcomes after SKPT compared with NAA patients. Further longitudinal follow-up is needed to determine the ultimate impact of these findings on long-term patient and graft survival.

A multicenter analysis of the significance of HLA matching on outcomes after kidney-pancreas transplantation.

The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of HLA matching on outcomes in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant (SKPT) recipients in a multicenter trial. From March 1999 to May 2001, a total of 297 SKPT recipients were enrolled in a prospective randomized trial of 2 daclizumab dosing strategies versus no antibody induction in combination with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids in SKPT recipients. Subanalyses using both univariate and multivariate models were performed at 1 year to identify factors associated with acute rejection, graft loss, or death. Potential risk factors evaluated were treatment group, African American ethnicity, HLA-A mismatches (MM), HLA-B MM, HLA-DR MM, total HLA MM, surgical technique, cytomegalovirus status of donor and recipient, and delayed graft function (DGF). Univariate analyses revealed that treatment group, HLA-A MM, HLA-B MM, total HLA MM >3, and DGF were significantly associated with acute rejection. These variables were then entered into logistic and Cox regression analyses. HLA-A MM and DGF were the only variables that remained significantly associated with acute rejection in the multivariate model. The relative risk for acute rejection in recipients with HLA-A MM was 1.56 (P = .02). In conclusion, despite contemporary immunosuppression, the degree of HLA MM, particularly HLA-A, and DGF are associated with an increased risk for acute rejection in SKPT recipients at 1 year. Less rejection was noted in patients with 0 MM at all 3 HLA loci and in patients with total HLA-MM <3. However, none of these factors affected short-term patient or graft survival rates.