Health literacy, sunscreen and sunbed use: an uneasy association.

BACKGROUND: Skin cancer can largely be prevented by avoiding unsafe ultraviolet radiation (UVR) exposure. The evidence on potential drivers of sunscreen and sunbed use is extensive, yet in some cases, such as education, remains rather unclear. Health literacy is receiving increasing attention, but its effect on tanning decisions has not yet been explored. OBJECTIVES: To explore the association between health literacy and tanning behaviour, in terms of sunscreen and sunbed use. METHODS: Self-reported data were collected through a common questionnaire in eight European countries under a common protocol. A three-item measure was used to assess health literacy; one item was collected to measure current sunscreen use and one item to measure current sunbed use. Descriptive statistics and analysis of variance tests were applied to explore the profile of sunbed and sunscreen users and health literacy among a number of variables. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were used to assess the relation between health literacy and sunscreen and sunbed use. RESULTS: Univariate results suggested that health literacy has opposite effects on sunscreen use vs. sunbed use. Increased health literacy was associated with the skin cancer protective practice of using sunscreen, but also with more sunbed use. In the multivariate models, health literacy had a significant effect only on sunscreen use. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that health literacy can be an interesting approach for influencing sunscreen use. In the case of sunbeds, based on the findings and contrary to what was expected, it can be argued that interventions targeting health literacy seem less likely to reduce sunbed use. More research is needed to elucidate the effect of health literacy on sunscreen and sunbed use in order to improve UVR prevention strategies.

Potential impact of interventions resulting in reduced exposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation (UVA and UVB) on skin cancer incidence in four European countries, 2010-2050.

BACKGROUND: Behavioural interventions to reduce exposure to ultraviolet radiation (UVR) can reduce risk of skin cancer. OBJECTIVES: To integrate the data and to evaluate the impact of interventions to limit exposure to UVR on skin cancer incidence in four selected countries. METHODS: Using PREVENT, a dynamic simulation model, we modelled the potential for skin cancer prevention in four European countries under various scenarios to avoid damage by UVR. RESULTS: In general, the most effective interventions were those aimed at protecting people during outdoor work and outdoor hobbies against the harmful effects of UVR, and combinations of several interventions. These could in theory lead to reductions of up to 45% in skin cancer cases projected for the year 2050. CONCLUSIONS: The scope for prevention depends on the prevalence of the risk factors in the different countries, as well as the associated risk factors and time lags modelled.

Assessing physicians' preferences on skin cancer treatment in Europe.

BACKGROUND: A wide variety of both surgical and nonsurgical therapies is currently available for patients with skin cancer. OBJECTIVES: This part of the EPIDERM (European Prevention Initiative for Dermatological Malignancies) project is aimed at the evaluation of the treatment preferences for skin cancer in eight countries of the European Union. METHODS: A multicentre hospital-based case-control study was carried out at dermatology departments in Finland, Germany, Greece, Italy, Malta, Poland, Scotland and Spain. Patients with skin cancer (basal cell carcinoma, actinic keratosis, squamous cell carcinoma, cutaneous malignant melanoma and Bowen disease) were consecutively enrolled between July 2008 and July 2010. Information on the study variables (sex, age, country, tumour type, anatomical location and treatment) was obtained from questionnaires designed by the EPIDERM project. RESULTS: In total, 1708 patients with skin cancer were included. Surgery was the first treatment option in 76·5% of the patients (P = 0·001). Actinic keratosis was the only tumour type in which nonsurgical treatment was more frequent than surgery (91·4%). Tumours on the head were less likely to be surgically excised than those at other locations (odds ratio 0·25, P = 0·001). Simple excision or curettage was the most common surgical procedure (65·4%), followed by graft and flaps (22·4%). Cryotherapy was the most common nonsurgical option (52·4%), followed by imiquimod (18·0%), photodynamic therapy (PDT; 12·0%), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU; 5·7%), and diclofenac with hyaluronic acid (4·0%). CONCLUSIONS: Surgery remains the first-choice treatment of skin cancer. Regarding nonsurgical treatments, the conservative treatments available (imiquimod, 5-FU, PDT and diclofenac gel) have not yet exceeded the use of ablative options such as cryotherapy despite their accepted benefit of treating field cancerization.

Known and potential new risk factors for skin cancer in European populations: a multicentre case-control study.

BACKGROUND: During recent years numerous studies have suggested that personal and environmental factors might influence cancer development. OBJECTIVES: To investigate environmental and personal characteristics associated with skin cancer risk. METHODS: A multicentre hospital-based case-control study was performed in Finland, Germany, Greece, Italy, Malta, Poland, Scotland and Spain, including 409 patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), 602 with basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and 360 with cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM) and 1550 control persons. Exposures were assessed by questionnaires that were partly self-administered, partly completed by dermatologists. Unconditional logistic regression modelling was used to assess associations including the influence of certain drugs and food items on skin cancer risk. RESULTS: The usual associations were observed for sun exposure and pigmentation characteristics, with chronic sun exposure being most strongly associated with SCC risk, and naevi and atypical naevi with CMM risk. Use of ciprofloxacin was associated with a decreased risk of BCC [odds ratio (OR) 0·33] and use of thiazide diuretics was associated with an increased risk of SCC (OR 1·66). Ciprofloxacin was also associated with SCC (OR 0·34) and thiazines with BCC (OR 2·04), but these associations lost significance after correction for multiple testing. Consumption of pomegranate, rich in antioxidants, was associated with decreased BCC and SCC risk, also after correcting for multiple testing. Recent experience of stressful events was associated with increased risk, particularly of CMM. CONCLUSIONS: In this large case-control study from across Europe the expected associations were observed for known risk factors. Some new potential protective factors and potential risk factors were identified for consumption of certain food items, medication use and stress, which deserve further investigation in future studies.

Risk factors for actinic keratosis in eight European centres: a case-control study.

BACKGROUND: There are limited data regarding the association of actinic keratosis (AK) and other types of nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC); studies investigating possible correlation of AK with melanocytic naevi are even scarcer. To our knowledge, there are no data examining the risk of AK in people using specific medications. OBJECTIVE: To investigate constitutional and exposure risk factors leading to AK and the coexistence of AK with NMSC and melanoma. METHODS: A multicentre hospital-based case-control study was performed in Finland, Germany, Greece, Italy, Malta, Poland, Scotland and Spain, including 343 patients with actinic keratosis (AK), 409 with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), 602 with basal cell carcinoma (BCC), 360 with invasive melanoma and 119 with in situ melanoma, and 686 control subjects. Exposures were assessed by questionnaires that were partly self-administered and partly filled out by dermatologists. Unconditional logistic regression modelling was used to assess associations including the influence of phenotypic characteristics, presence of naevi, sun-exposure habits and certain drugs on AK risk. RESULTS: Differences in hair and eye coloration variably influenced the risk for AK, with red hair signifying a seven times higher risk [odds ratio (OR) 6·9, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4·34-11·00), and brown - compared with blue - eyes, about a 40% reduced risk (OR 0·61, 95% CI 0·13-0·92). The darker the skin phototype, the lower the risk for AK, with phototype IV exhibiting nine times less risk of developing AK. Some and many freckles on the arms were associated with an OR of 1·8 (95% CI 1·08-2·81) and 3·0 (95% CI 1·10-3·54), respectively, while overall number of naevi and high educational level were inversely associated with AK. Sun exposure, thiazide diuretics and cardiac drugs had a higher risk for AK. SCC was the most frequent (58%) skin neoplasm coexisting with AKs, followed by BCC (30%), melanoma in situ (12%) and invasive melanoma (6%). CONCLUSION: In this large case-control study from across Europe the expected associations were confirmed for known risk factors. Some possible new risk factors, including cardiac and diuretic drugs, were identified, creating a new field for further investigation in future studies.

The patient journey: a report of skin cancer care across Europe.

BACKGROUND: There are poorly documented variations in the journey a skin cancer patient will follow from diagnosis to treatment in the European Union. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the possible difficulties or obstacles that a person with a skin malignancy in the European Union may have to overcome in order to receive adequate medical screening and care for his/her condition. In addition, we wished to explore differences in European health systems, which may lead to health inequalities and health inequities within Europe. METHODS: Ten European countries took part in this investigation (in alphabetical order): Finland, Germany, Greece, Italy, Malta, Poland, Romania, Spain, the Netherlands and the U.K. The individual participants undertook local and national enquiries within their own country and completed a questionnaire. RESULTS: This exercise has identified important differences in the management of a skin cancer patient, reflecting major disparities in health care between European countries. CONCLUSIONS: Further investigation of health disparities and efforts to address health inequalities should lead to improvements in European health care quality and reduction in morbidity from skin cancer.