Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Rofo ; 169(5): 484-9, 1998 Nov.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9849597

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: A prospective study of the diagnostic accuracy and image quality of two MRI systems in the detection of renal tumors was investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 34 patients with the clinical suspicion of a space-occupying renal lesion were examined by MRI with a low field (0.2 Tesla magnet) and a high field (1.5 Tesla magnet) for comparison. An "informed" and a "blind" observer evaluated all of the MR images. In addition, the signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios were evaluated as second quality parameters. RESULTS: In 29 cases the results could be compared with a confirmed release diagnosis. Diagnostic accuracy was comparable with both systems (Sensitivity for both observer on LF apparatus: 83%, HF apparatus: 81%) although the signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios were significantly poorer at low field. CONCLUSIONS: The low field system in comparable to the high field MRI for detection and differentiation of renal space-occupying lesions.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Renales Quísticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Renales/diagnóstico , Riñón/patología , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Errores Diagnósticos , Reacciones Falso Negativas , Reacciones Falso Positivas , Gadolinio DTPA , Humanos , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Estudios Prospectivos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA