The Matilda Effect: Underrecognition of Women in Hematology and Oncology Awards.

BACKGROUND: The proportion of women in the field of hematology and oncology (H&O) has increased over recent decades, but the representation of women in leadership positions remains poor. In an effort to close the gender gap in academia, it is important to report on such inequities in hopes to close these gaps and improve career development. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, observational study of published award recipients from 1994 to 2019 from the seven major H&O societies in the world. Gender was determined based on publicly available data. The χ2 and Cochran-Armitage tests were used for data analysis. RESULTS: Of the 1,642 awardees over the past 26 years, 915 met inclusion criteria. Award recipients were overwhelmingly men (77.9%) and non-Hispanic White (84.7%). Women awardees received 30.3% of the humanistic and education-related awards, whereas only receiving 16.0% of basic science awards (p < .01). Women represent 35.6% of all hematologists and oncologists but only received 24.0% of awards given to these physicians (p = .004). Black, Hispanic, and Asian awardees represented 3.7%, 3.3%, and 6.8% of the total awardees, respectively. CONCLUSION: From 1994 to 2019, women were less likely to receive recognition awards from the seven major H&O societies studied compared with men. We also observed a considerably low proportion of minority awardees across all oncology subspecialties. Further studies examining how selection criteria favor either gender would be warranted in order to achieve equal representation in academic awards. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: In this study, women and minority groups were found to be underrepresented amongst award recipients. Significant disparities were seen in disciplines that have been historically male predominant, such as basic sciences. As awards on an international level enhance academic resumes and assist with career advancement, it is important that awards are being given in an equitable manner. First steps to promote diversity and inclusion in academic medicine is reporting of gender and racial disparities in various areas of academia.

Lisocabtagene maraleucel for treatment of relapsed and refractory primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma in an adolescent patient.

The safety and efficacy of CAR T-cell therapy are unknown in pediatric and adolescent patients with relapsed or refractory primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (R/R PMBCL) which is associated with dismal prognosis. Here, we present a case report of a 16-year-old patient with R/R PMBCL treated with lisocabtagene maraleucel including correlative studies. Patient achieved complete response at 6 months without cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome. She only experienced mild cytopenias, requiring filgrastim once. This report highlights the safety and efficacy of lisocabtagene maraleucel in this population, warranting prospective studies to improve clinical outcomes.

The Impact of Time From Diagnosis to Initiation of Chemotherapy on Survival of Patients With Newly Diagnosed Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma in the Veterans Health Administration.

INTRODUCTION: Our retrospective study evaluates the impact of time from diagnosis to treatment (TDT) on outcomes of patients with newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) treated within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). METHODS: VHA patients diagnosed with DLBCL between 2011 and 2019 were included, while those with primary central nervous system lymphoma were excluded. The median overall survival and progression-free survival were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate, bivariate, and multivariable analyses were performed using the Cox proportional hazards model. The odds ratio for refractory outcomes was calculated using logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 2448 patients were included. The median time from diagnosis to treatment of the cohort was 19 days. When comparing median progression-free survival, median overall survival, and the 2-year overall survival between the group that started treatment within 1 week and each of the other groups individually, there was a significant difference favoring improved survival in all groups with a TDT longer than 1 week (P < .0001). These patients also had a lower odds ratio for refractory outcomes. On multivariable analysis, TDT remained an independent prognostic factor. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that a TDT equal to or less than 1 week is associated with adverse clinical factors, worse outcomes, and response in DLBCL, even after adjusting for multiple known poor prognostic factors. This was the first time that response to first-line therapy was correlated to time to treatment. Our findings support ongoing efforts to improve currently standardized prognostic tools and the incorporation of TDT into clinical trials to avoid selection bias.

The impact of race and ethnicity on diffuse large B-cell lymphoma outcomes within the veterans health administration (VHA).

We performed a retrospective chart review of 6266 randomly selected DLBCL patients treated in the VHA nationwide between 1/1/2011 and 12/31/2021. The 3178 patients who met inclusion criteria were predominantly male (97%) and white (75%). Median age of diagnosis for Black patients was 63 years vs 69 years for the entire cohort (p < 0.001). However, patients in each race/ethnicity subgroup presented with similar rates of stage I/II and III/IV disease, IPI score, cell of origin and HIT status. Outcomes analysis revealed similar treatment, response rates, median overall survival, and 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival across all subgroups. Hispanic patients had a 21% lower risk of death (HR = 0.79) than white patients, and Black patients had no significant difference in survival (HR = 0.98). This large retrospective study shows that when standard of care therapy is given within an equal access system, short-term treatment and survival outcomes are the same for all races.

Outcomes in chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients on novel agents in the US Veterans Health Administration System.

The US veteran population has a high proportion of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) risk factors. Using the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) population, we conducted a retrospective chart review of 1205 CLL patients who initiated treatment with a novel oral agent. For 1L ibrutinib, 33% (n = 107) discontinued therapy during the study, of which 64% discontinued due to adverse events (AEs). For relapsed/refractory (R/R) ibrutinib, 35% (n = 262) discontinued therapy, of which 63% discontinued due to AEs. For R/R venetoclax, 31% (n = 27) discontinued therapy, of which 41% were due to AEs. For idelalisib, 84% (n = 41) discontinued therapy, of which 54% were due to AEs. This real-world study suggests that AEs play an important role in dose reductions and discontinuations; however, physician inexperience in using these drugs when they were first introduced could be part of what is leading to these negative outcomes.

Aggressive eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis and transverse sinus thrombosis.

We report a case of a patient with eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA, previously known as Churg-Strauss syndrome) who succumbed to respiratory failure complicated by sepsis, pneumonitis and transverse sinus thrombosis. In the absence of antineutrophilic cytoplasmic antibodies positivity, a clinical diagnosis was made based on The American College of Rheumatology-1990 criteria. Glucocorticoids, cyclophosphamide, rituximab and intravenous immunoglobulin were administered at different stages. The patient recovered momentarily after each cycle of treatment, but his vasculitis progressed and he eventually died. Cardiac or renal involvement, which is more commonly associated with an adverse outcome, was not present.