Chronic arthritides and bone structure: focus on rheumatoid arthritis-an update.

Normal bone remodeling depends of a balance between bone forming cells, osteoblasts and bone resorbing cells, the osteoclasts. In chronic arthritides and some inflammatory and autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, there is a great constellation of cytokines produced by pannus that impair bone formation and stimulate bone resorption by inducing osteoclast differentiation and inhibiting osteoblast maturation. Patients with chronic inflammation have multiple causes that lead to low bone mineral density, osteoporosis and a high risk of fracture including circulating cytokines, impaired mobility, chronic administration of glucocorticoids, low vitamin D levels and post-menopausal status in women, among others. Biologic agents and other therapeutic measures to reach prompt remission might ameliorate these deleterious effects. In many cases, bone acting agents need to be added to conventional treatment to reduce the risk of fractures and to preserve articular integrity and independency for daily living activities. A limited number of studies related to fractures in chronic arthritides were published, and future investigation is needed to determine the risk of fractures and the protective effects of different treatments to reduce this risk.

Evidence based Latin American Guidelines of clinical practice on prevention, diagnosis, management and treatment of glucocorticoid induced osteoporosis. A 2022 update : This manuscript has been produced under the auspices of the Committee of National Societies (CNS) and the Committee of Scientific Advisors (CSA) of the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF).

Guidelines and recommendations developed and endorsed by the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) are intended to provide guidance for particular pattern of practice for physicians who usually prescribe glucocorticoid (GC) therapy, and not to dictate the care of a particular patient. Adherence to the recommendations within this guideline is voluntary and the ultimate determination regarding their application should be made by the physician in light of each patient's circumstances. Guidelines and recommendations are intended to promote a desirable outcome but cannot guarantee any specific outcome. This guideline and its recommendations are not intended to dictate payment, reimbursement or insurance decisions. Guidelines and recommendations are subjected to periodic revisions as a consequence of the evolution of medicine, technology and clinical practice. A panel of Latin American (LATAM) experts specialized in osteoporosis with recognized clinical experience in managing patients with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIO) met to produce evidence-based LATAM recommendations for the diagnosis and management of GIO. These guidelines are particularly intended to general practitioners and primary care physicians who prescribe GC treatments in LATAM to guide their daily clinical practice in terms of evaluation, prevention and treatment of GIO. These recommendations were based on systematic literature review using MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS and COCHRANE Library database during the period from 2012 to 2021. Randomized clinical trials (RCT), systematic reviews of RCT, controlled observational studies, guidelines and consensus were considered. Based on the review and expert opinion the panel members voted recommendations during two successive rounds of voting by panel members. Agreements for each statement were considered if a concordance of at least 70% was achieved following Delphi methodology. Grading of recommendations was made according to the Oxford Centre for the Evidence-based Medicine (EBM) criteria. Among five GIO guidelines and consensus initially identified, two of them (American College of Rheumatology 2017 and the Brazilian Guidelines 2021) were selected for comparison considering the latter as the most current guides in the LATAM region. Based on this methodology fifty statements were issued. All of them but four (1.20, 1.21, 1.23 and 4.2) attained agreement.

The patient journey of fibromyalgia in Latin America.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the patient journey of people with fibromyalgia (FM) in Latin American countries in order to identify problems in health care and other areas that may be resolvable. METHODS: Qualitative study with phenomenological and content analysis approach through focus groups and patient journey (Ux; User Experience) methodology. Nine virtual focus groups were conducted with FM patients and healthcare professionals in Argentina, Mexico and Colombia recruited from key informants and social networks. RESULTS: Forty-three people participated (33 were clinicians and 10 were patients). The agents interacting with the patient in their disease journey are found in three spheres: healthcare (multiple medical specialists and other professionals), support and work life (including patient associations) and socioeconomic context. The line of the journey presents two large sections, two loops and a thin dashed line. The two major sections represent the time from first symptoms to medical visit (characterized by self-medication and denial) and the time from diagnosis to follow-up (characterized by high expectations and multiple contacts to make life changes that are not realized). The two loop phases include (1) succession of misdiagnoses and mistreatments and referrals to specialists and (2) new symptoms every so often, visits to specialists, diagnostic doubts, and impatience. Very few patients manage to reach the final phase of autonomy. CONCLUSION: The journey of a person with FM in Latin America is full of obstacles and loops. The desired goal is for all the agents involved to understand that self- management by the patient with FM is an essential part of success, and this can only be achieved with early access to resources and guidance from professionals.

Debut con actividad leve del lupus eritematoso sistémico y su evolución / Systemic lupus erythematosus debut with mild activity and its evolution

Objetivos: evaluar si los pacientes con lupus eritematoso sistémico (LES) al momento del diagnóstico con baja actividad de la enfermedad presentaron un curso más benigno de la enfermedad vs. aquellos que tuvieron actividad moderada/severa. Materiales y métodos: estudio observacional, analítico, de cohorte retrospectiva. Se revisaron historias clínicas de pacientes con diagnóstico de LES según criterios del American College of Rheumatology (ACR 1982/1997), del Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC 2012) o del ACR/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR 2019), con un seguimiento mínimo de un año, que acudieron a la Sección de Reumatología del Hospital Rivadavia de la Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires. Resultados: se incluyeron 100 pacientes con diagnóstico de LES, de los cuales el 44% presentaba actividad leve, mientras que el 56% tenía actividad moderada o severa al diagnóstico. Se observaron diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre ambos grupos en la cantidad de brotes a lo largo de la evolución de la enfermedad (mediana del grupo con actividad leve 0 (RIC 0-1) vs. mediana del grupo actividad moderada o severa 1 (RIC 1-2); p<0,01). Se detectó un menor compromiso de órganos durante la evolución de la enfermedad en aquellos con actividad basal leve en comparación con actividad basal moderada/severa, con diferencias estadísticamente significativas en el compromiso renal (15,91% vs. 55,36%; p<0,01). Conclusiones: los pacientes con actividad basal baja tuvieron un curso más benigno de la enfermedad y una menor cantidad de brotes severos, en comparación con quienes presentaron actividad moderada/severa al inicio de la enfermedad.

Objectives: to assess whether patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and low disease activity at the time of diagnosis have a more benign course of the disease vs those who have moderate/severe activity at the time of diagnosis. Materials and methods: observational, analytical, retrospective cohort study. Clinical records of patients diagnosed with SLE according to ACR 1982/1997 Criteria, SLICC 2012 or ACR/EULAR 2019, who attended the Rheumatology Section of Rivadavia hospital in CABA, Argentina, were reviewed. Results: a total of 100 patients diagnosed with SLE were included, of which 44% had mild activity, while the remaining 56% had moderate or severe activity at diagnosis. Statistically significant differences were observed between the group that had mild baseline activity vs the group that presented moderate/severe baseline activity, with the first group presenting fewer flares throughout the course of the disease (median of the first group 0 (IQR 0-1) vs median of the second, 1 (IQR 1-2); p<0.01). Less organ involvement was observed throughout the course of the disease in those with mild baseline activity compared with moderate/severe baseline activity, with statistically significant differences in renal involvement (15.91% versus 55.36%; p<0.01). Conclusions: patients with low baseline activity had a more benign disease course, presenting fewer severe flares compared to patients who presented moderate to severe activity at disease onset.