Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) / Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT): Benefit to Irish patients and Irish Healthcare Economy.

Cancer incidence across Europe is projected to rise rapidly over the next decade. This rising cancer incidence is mirrored by increasing use of and indications for stereotactic radiation. This paper seeks to summarize the exponential increase in indications for stereotactic radiotherapy as well as the evolving economic advantages of stereotactic radiosurgery and stereotactic body radiotherapy.

Management of synchronous rectal and prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: Although well described, there is limited published data related to management on the coexistence of prostate and rectal cancer. The aim of this study was to describe a single institution's experience with this and propose a treatment algorithm based on the best available evidence. METHODS: From 2000 to 2011, a retrospective review of institutional databases was performed to identify patients with synchronous prostate and rectal cancers where the rectal cancer lay in the lower two thirds of the rectum. Operative and non-operative outcomes were analysed and a management algorithm is proposed. RESULTS: Twelve patients with prostate and rectal cancer were identified. Three were metachronous diagnoses (>3-month time interval) and nine were synchronous diagnoses. In the synchronous group, four had metastatic disease at presentation and were treated symptomatically, while five were treated with curative intent. Treatment included pelvic radiotherapy (74 Gy) followed by pelvic exenteration (three) and watchful waiting for rectal cancer (one). The remaining patient had a prostatectomy, long-course chemoradiotherapy and anterior resection. There were no operative mortalities and acceptable morbidity. Three remain alive with two patients disease-free. CONCLUSIONS: Synchronous detection of prostate cancer and cancer of the lower two thirds of the rectum is uncommon, but likely to increase with rigorous preoperative staging of rectal cancer and increased awareness of the potential for synchronous disease. Treatment must be individualized based on the stage of the individual cancers taking into account the options for both cancers including EBRT (both), surgery (both), hormonal therapy (prostate), surgery (both) and watchful waiting (both).

Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy for Large (≥5 cm) Non-small Cell Lung Carcinoma.

AIMS: Stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) is a standard of care for medically inoperable early stage non-small cell lung carcinoma. Tumours greater than 5 cm have been excluded from randomised trials using SABR and, hence, it is not used as a standard for larger lung tumours. However, improvements in radiation therapy techniques and the success of SABR in treatment of early stage disease may allow safe delivery of ablative doses to larger tumours. We analysed our experience with tumours ≥5 cm to determine the efficacy and toxicity profile of SABR in this setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated survival, control rates, patterns of failure and toxicity in patients with a tumour diameter larger than 5 cm that had no nodal or distant metastases treated with SABR technology. Patients had been treated in two centres since 2009 and were retrospectively analysed. All patients had positron emission tomography staging, were discussed at a tumour board and were documented to have no nodal or distant metastatic disease. Treatment outcomes were analysed using Kaplan-Meier estimates and compared using the Log-rank test. Cox regression was used to investigate the association between the survival outcomes and predictor variables. RESULTS: In total, 86 patients were identified. Six patients had no follow-up imaging. Therefore, 80 patients were available for analysis. All patients were reclassified according to the updated AJCC eighth edition. The median follow-up was 19.6 months. No patients received neoadjuvant or concurrent systemic therapy. One patient received adjuvant systemic therapy. The median age at treatment was 77 years (range 58-91). Eighty-four per cent were stage T3N0M0 and 16% were staged T4N0M0. The median tumour diameter was 5.8 cm (range 5.0-9.3 cm). The median gross tumour volume, measured on a single phase of the respiratory cycle, was 45.7 cm3 (range 12.1-203.3 cm3). The median overall survival was 20.9 months (95% confidence interval 12.6-29.1 months). One-, 2- and 3-year overall survival was 71%, 48% and 32%, respectively. The median local failure-free survival was 19.5 months (95% confidence interval 14.4-24.6). The median disease-free survival was 15.1 months (95% confidence interval 9.9-20.4 months). Local control at 1, 2 and 3 years was 85% (95% confidence interval 76-94%), 71% (95% confidence interval 58-84%) and 57% (95% confidence interval 40-74%), respectively. Forty-four patients (55%) had any treatment failure (local, mediastinal, intrapulmonary or distant metastases). Out-of-field intrapulmonary disease progression was the most common mode of failure, occurring in 21 patients (26%). Local failure occurred in 19 patients (24%) - alone or in combination with other progression. Distant metastases occurred in 20 patients (25%). Neither histological subtype, tumour size nor gross tumour volume had a statistically significant effect on local failure-free survival. Two patients experienced grade 3 late dyspnoea. There were no other reported grade 3 or higher acute or late toxicities. CONCLUSION: SABR for larger lung tumours ≥5 cm results in high local control and acceptable survival in patients with medically inoperable large non-small cell lung carcinoma treated with radiation alone. Such patients should be considered for SABR owing to fewer treatment fractions and acceptable toxicity. Local control analysis reveals a sustained pattern of local failure emphasising the need for long-term follow-up. Improvements in technical strategies are required to further improve local control.

Late Toxicity and Long-Term Local Control in Patients With Ultra-Central Lung Tumours Treated by Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy-Based Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy With Homogenous Dose Prescription.

AIMS: To report late toxicity and long-term outcomes of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT)-based stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) in patients with ultra-central lung tumours. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a single-institution retrospective analysis of patients treated with SABR for ultra-central tumours between May 2008 and April 2016. Ultra-central location was defined as tumour (GTV) abutting or involving trachea, main or lobar bronchi. Respiratory motion management and static-field dynamic-IMRT were used, with dose prescribed homogeneously (maximum <120%). Descriptive analysis, Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test and Cox regression were used to assess outcomes. RESULTS: Sixty-five per cent of patients had inoperable primary non-small cell lung cancer and 35% had lung oligometastases. The median age was 72 (range 34-85) years. The median gross tumour volume and planning target volume (PTV) were 19.6 (range 1.7-203.3) cm3 and 57.4 (range 7.7-426.6) cm3, respectively. The most commonly used dose fractionation was 60 Gy in eight fractions (n = 51, 87.8%). Median BED10 for D98%PTV and D2%PTV were 102.6 Gy and 115.06 Gy, respectively. With a median follow-up of 26.5 (range 3.2-100.5) months, fatal haemoptysis occurred in five patients (8.7%), of which two were directly attributable to SABR. A statistically significant difference was identified between median BED3 for 4 cm3 of airway, for patients who developed haemoptysis versus those who did not (147.4 versus 47.2 Gy, P = 0.005). At the last known follow-up, 50 patients (87.7%) were without local recurrence. Freedom from local progression at 2 and 4 years was 92 and 79.8%, respectively. The median overall survival was 34.3 (95% confidence interval 6.1-61.6) months. Overall survival at 2 and 4 years was 55.1 and 41.2%, respectively. CONCLUSION: In patients with high-risk ultra-central lung tumours, IMRT-based SABR with homogenous dose prescription achieves high local control, similar to that reported for peripheral tumours. Although fatal haemoptysis occurred in 8.7% of patients, a direct causality with SABR was evident in only 3%. Larger studies are warranted to ascertain factors associated with outcomes, especially toxicity, and identify patients who would probably benefit from this treatment.

A Phase II Toxicity End Point Trial (ICORG 99-09) of Accelerated Dose-escalated Hypofractionated Radiation in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

AIMS: The objective of this phase II clinical trial was to prospectively evaluate the safety and efficacy of accelerated hypofractionated three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) in localised non-resectable/non-operable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty patients with stage I-III NSCLC were enrolled in a prospective single-arm All Ireland Co-operative Oncology Research Group (ICORG 99-09) toxicity end point phase II trial. The protocol allocated patients between three radiation schedule dose levels (60, 66 or 72 Gy, in 20, 22 and 24 fractions, respectively, 3 Gy daily, five fractions per week) according to combined lung V25Gy (V25Gy ≤ 30%) with built-in early stopping toxicity rules. The primary end point was toxicity with evaluation of dose-limiting toxicity. The secondary objectives included radiological tumour response rate at 3 months after the completion of radiation therapy and the thoracic progression-free survival time. RESULTS: Sixty patients were recruited from August 1999 to June 2009. Forty-nine patients were included in the primary per-protocol analysis. Eleven patients were not evaluable. In the first 30 evaluable patient cohort, severe oesophageal toxicity was reported in two patients (2/49; 4% experiencing grade 5 oesophageal late toxicity, related to the 97% oesophageal length). The trial was temporarily closed and was then reopened to validate an oesophageal dose volume constraint (DVC) of limiting the length of oesophagus fully encompassed by the 97% isodose to less than 1 cm (applied to 21 patients). The trial prospectively showed the safety of the oesophageal DVC, with no oesophageal toxicity above grade 3 thereafter. Thirty-nine per cent of patients had disease progression at 3-4 months after radiotherapy, 22% had stable disease, 20% had a complete response and 14% had a partial response. The median overall survival was 13.6 months (95% confidence interval 10.5-16.7) and overall survival at 1 and 3 years was 57% and 29%, respectively. CONCLUSION: A strategy using accelerated hypofractionated 3DCRT is feasible and reasonably safe for patients with inoperable NSCLC. It is safe to deliver for centrally located tumours if DVCs are applied to the oesophagus, which is the primary dose-limiting toxicity. Further studies are required to assess the efficacy of hypofractionated regimens for centrally located tumours using an oesophageal DVC and monitoring for oesophageal toxicity.

Postoperative radiation for lung cancer metastatic to the brain.

PURPOSE: Although resection of single brain metastases and postoperative whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) improves survival, compared with treatment using WBRT alone, the value of postoperative WBRT after resection of brain metastases is controversial. We analyzed the largest reported series of lung cancer patients with resected brain metastases to evaluate the impact of postoperative WBRT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1974 and 1989, 185 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) underwent resection of brain metastases. Patients who had received preoperative WBRT (23%, 42 of 185) were excluded. The remaining patients were divided into group A (no WBRT; n = 32), group B (patients received WBRT and were prognostically matched to group A; n = 32), and group C (all other WBRT patients; n = 79). Most patients received postoperative doses of 30 Gy in 10 fractions. Higher doses were used in 16% of group B and 18% of group C patients. RESULTS: Overall 5-year survival rates were as follows: group A, 12%; B, 8%; C, 16%. Overall brain failures occurred in 38% of patients in group A, 47% in group B, and 42% in group C. The use of WBRT (group A v groups B plus C) had no apparent impact on survival or on overall brain failure rates. In particular, no improvement in either of these parameters could be demonstrated when group B was compared with group A. Focal failure (defined as failure within the brain adjacent to the site of the resected brain metastases) occurred as follows: group A, 34% (11 of 32); groups B plus C, 23% (25 of 111) (P = .07). WBRT significantly reduced focal failure for patients with adenocarcinoma (group A, 33% [eight of 24]; groups B plus C, 14% [11 of 79]; P = .05). Nonfocal failure (anatomically distinct from the resected metastasis) occurred in 9% of patients in group A (three of 32), 21% in groups B plus C (23 of 111) (P = .07). CONCLUSION: Long-term survival is possible when NSCLC brain metastases are resected. Postoperative WBRT as used in this series only had an impact on the focal control of brain metastases and this effect was of borderline significance. The lack of conclusive benefit supports the need for ongoing randomized trials to test the value of adjuvant postoperative WBRT. Brain failures were relatively common in all three groups of patients, which suggests that doses greater than 30 Gy need to be studied.

Organ-function preservation in advanced oropharynx cancer: results with induction chemotherapy and radiation.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of a strategy using induction chemotherapy followed by radiation therapy (RT) as a means of organ-function preservation in patients with advanced oropharynx cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 1983 to December 1990, 33 patients with advanced squamous cell oropharynx cancer whose appropriate surgical management would have required a tongue procedure and potential total laryngectomy were treated with one to three cycles of cisplatin (CDDP)-based induction chemotherapy. Patients with a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) at the primary site then received definitive external-beam RT with or without interstitial implant with or without neck dissection with surgery to the primary tumor site reserved for disease persistence or relapse; patients with less than a PR after chemotherapy had appropriate surgery and postoperative RT recommended. RESULTS: With a median follow-up period of 6.2 years, actuarial overall and failure-free survival rates at 5 years are 41% and 42%, respectively. Chemotherapy toxicity contributed to the death of two patients and was possibly a factor in two others. Local control was achieved in 14 patients (42%) without any surgery to the larynx or tongue. Among 13 patients currently alive, all had a preserved larynx and only one required tongue surgery; 12 of 13 have speech subjectively described as always understandable; and nine of 13 have no significant restrictions in their diet. CONCLUSION: This treatment program is feasible and effective in patients with advanced oropharynx cancer and produces an excellent functional outcome in most long-term survivors. Modifications to optimize patient selection, minimize toxicity, and improve local control are indicated. The relative toxicity, efficacy, and functional outcome provided by this and other chemotherapy and RT programs versus either standard surgery and/or RT options can only be addressed in a randomized comparison of these therapies.

Long-term outcome of small cell lung cancer.

Long-term survival (greater than or equal to 3 years) is possible in a small proportion of patients with SCLC, particularly if the disease is limited in extent. The influence of thoracic irradiation on the long-term outcome of limited stage patients is controversial, although there is a suggestion of benefit. Despite the use of irradiation, thoracic recurrence is the single most important site of treatment failure. Further experience will be necessary to determine if radiotherapeutic strategies to enhance thoracic control can improve long-term survival. Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) may influence long-term survival of limited stage patients who achieve a complete response to therapy and remain controlled in the chest. However, this is not clearly established and must be considered in the light of the contribution of PCI to neurotoxicity occurring in survivors. Reduction in the radiation fraction size and the omission of chemotherapeutic agents which cause neurotoxicity, either alone or by synergism with PCI, are reasonable approaches to pursue in an attempt to prevent this complication. A small proportion of NSCLC occurring after treatment of SCLC may be preventable by attempts to eradicate NSCLC components present in the original SCLC. Leukemogenic chemotherapy agents may contribute to the development of secondary ANL, and should probably not be used in view of the availability of alternative equally effective agents.

Radiation therapy for medically inoperable stage I and II non-small cell lung cancer.

The published results of primary radiation therapy for early stage NSCLC, indicate that it is a reasonable alternative in patients with medical contraindications or who refuse surgery, resulting in acceptable morbidity, local control, and survival rates. There is no conclusive evidence that EMI is of benefit. Consequently treatment with involved field alone, may be considered when there is no evidence of hilar involvement, or when it is necessary to limit the volume of lung tissue irradiated. Although the data are not conclusive, there is evidence to suggest that the total dose of radiation delivered to the primary should be sufficient to eradicate gross disease (60 Gy or higher). Such does result in high response rates particularly for T1 tumors. There is also an indication that complete responders have better survival than other patients, suggesting that radiotherapeutic strategies to enhance tumor eradication may improve survival.

Induction chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer with clinically evident mediastinal node metastases: the role of postoperative radiotherapy.

Survival for clinical Stage IIIa (T1-3, N2) non-small cell lung cancer is very poor because of poor local disease control and systemic spread. To address these shortcomings, we initiated a treatment program with induction chemotherapy, surgery, and postoperative radiation reserved for patients with residual disease at thoracotomy. Between 1984 and 1986, 41 patients with clinically evident N2 disease were treated with induction chemotherapy followed by resection and the selective use of intraoperative brachytherapy. All patients with tumor in the resection specimen received two cycles of chemotherapy and 15 patients received radiation therapy. With a median follow-up of 5.4 years, overall survival is 27% at 3 years, and 12% at 5 years. Despite the adverse selection process median survival is 19 months for patients receiving postoperative radiation therapy, and 22 months for the more favorable patients not requiring radiation therapy, supporting the selective use of postoperative radiation in this setting. In summary, this treatment has yielded good median survival and long-term survival for some of the patients. However, the ultimate value of this approach can only be determined by prospective trials which compare it to standard therapy.

Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy may improve the therapeutic ratio of high dose radiation therapy for lung cancer.

PURPOSE: The specific aim of 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy is to improve the target dose distribution while concomitantly reducing normal tissue dose. Such an approach should permit dose escalation until the limits of acceptable normal tissue toxicity are reached. To evaluate the feasibility of tumor dose escalation for nine patients with lung cancer, we determined the dose distribution to the target and normal tissues with 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy and conventional planning. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Plans were compared to assess adequacy of dose delivery to target volumes, dose-volume histograms for normal tissue, and normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCP) for nine patients with lung tumors. RESULTS: The mean percentage of gross disease which received < or = 70.2 Gy with 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) was 40% of the mean percentage of gross disease which received < or = 70.2 Gy with conventional treatment planning (CTP). The mean NTCP for lung parenchyma with 3DCRT was 36% of the mean NTCP with CTP. The mean esophageal NTCP with 3DCRT was 88% of the mean NTCP with CTP. CONCLUSION: This preliminary analysis suggests that three dimensional conformal radiation therapy may provide superior delivery of high dose radiation with reduced risk to normal tissue, suggesting that this approach may have the potential to improve the therapeutic ratio of high dose radiation therapy for lung cancer.

The use of a prosthetic tissue expander to displace bowel from a brachytherapy implant site.

We describe the use of a prosthetic maneuver to displace bowel from an implant site. The patient presented with a recurrent low grade fibrosarcoma which was grossly excised with positive microscopic margins in the right paravertebral area. For this reason we performed an Iridium-192 implant using afterloading catheters. Because of several dense adhesions, it was not possible to mobilize an omental sling over the implant site. To prevent the small bowel from lying on the catheters, we inserted a prosthetic breast tissue expander. This was expanded with saline and bacitracin solution and placed in the tumor bed overlying the catheters, thereby displacing the small bowel away from the sources. A postoperative CT scan with gastrograffin demonstrated that this procedure was effective. There were no complications. We conclude that such devices are suitable for use under these circumstances and can achieve the objective of decreasing the dose of radiation to the small bowel.

The importance of brachytherapy technique in the management of primary carcinoma of the vagina.

This retrospective analysis of 49 cases of primary carcinoma of the vagina treated with radiation therapy alone from 1970-1988 examines the results of treatment with an emphasis on the importance of brachytherapy technique. Thirty-six patients were treated with combined external beam radiation and brachytherapy, 11 patients were treated with external beam alone, and two patients were treated with brachytherapy alone. Brachytherapy techniques used included intracavitary implants, temporary Ir-192 interstitial implants, and permanent I-125 interstitial implants. Intracavitary therapy included the use of a fractionated high dose rate intravaginal cylinder, tandem and ovoids, and a low dose rate intravaginal cylinder. The 5-year actuarial survival was 44% for Stage I (six patients), 48% for Stage II (27 patients), 40% for Stage III (10 patients), and 0% for Stage IVa and IVb (six patients). There was a significant increase in the 5-year actuarial survival for those patients who had brachytherapy as part of their treatment compared to those patients treated with external beam alone (50% vs. 9%) (p < .001). For Stages II and III, there was a trend toward improved actuarial and crude disease free survival with the use of a temporary Ir-192 interstitial implant as part of the treatment compared to the use of intracavitary brachytherapy as part of the treatment (80% vs. 45%) (p = 0.25) and (75% vs. 44%) (p = 0.08), respectively. Brachytherapy plays an important role in the management of primary vaginal cancer. A temporary interstitial implant should be used over an intracavitary form of therapy for more invasive disease.

Postoperative radiation therapy for squamous cell carcinomas of the oral cavity and oropharynx: impact of therapy on patients with positive surgical margins.

PURPOSE: The presence of a positive or close margin after resection of a squamous cancer of the head and neck is associated with a significant risk of local recurrence. To determine the efficacy of postoperative radiation therapy for patients with advanced oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers with inadequate margins of resection, the present retrospective analysis was undertaken. METHODS AND MATERIALS: One hundred and two patients were treated with surgery and postoperative radiation therapy for advanced squamous cell carcinomas of the oral cavity and oropharynx. The anatomic subsites treated include oral tongue (n = 29), floor of mouth (n = 22), base of tongue (n = 31) and tonsillar fossa (n = 20). Twenty-five patients (25%) had positive margins, 41 patients (40%) had close margins (< or = 0.5 cm from the surgical margin) and 36 (35%) had negative margins. The median radiation dose was 6000 cGy. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 7 years, the actuarial control rate for patients with positive, close and negative margins was 79%, 71%, and 79%, respectively. When postoperative doses of > or = 60 Gy were delivered to patients with positive/close margins (excluding patients with oral tongue lesions), the 7-year actuarial control was 92%. In similar patients receiving < 60 Gy, the actuarial control was 44% (p = 0.0007). Compared to other anatomic subsites, inferior control rates were obtained with oral tongue lesions. For this subsite, the control rates for positive, close, and negative margins were 50%, 62% and 69% respectively. CONCLUSION: We conclude that excellent local control can be achieved with postoperative radiation therapy, despite the presence of inadequate margins of resection, when doses of > or = 60 Gy are used. Future strategies must be directed at further improving these results in patients with oral tongue lesions.

Paraspinal tumors: techniques and results of brachytherapy.

Because of their proximity to nerve roots and the spinal cord, it is frequently difficult to achieve complete resection of paraspinal tumors. We have used brachytherapy in an attempt to prevent local recurrence and its associated neurological sequelae. This report analyzes our experience with 35 patients to determine the feasibility, optimal techniques, and efficacy of this approach. The tumor types were non small-cell lung cancer (18), sarcomas (9), and other tumor types (8). Temporary, single plane implants using Ir-192 (median minimum peripheral dose 3000 cGy) were used in 21 patients, and permanent I-125 implants were used in 14 cases (median matched peripheral dose 12,500 cGy). Local control was achieved in 51% (18/35). However, local control was poor when lung cancers were implanted and in cases where the dura was exposed. Radiation myelitis did not occur despite the combined effects of previous external beam radiotherapy (N = 21) and brachytherapy. Our experience demonstrates that combined surgery and paraspinal brachytherapy can be performed with acceptable toxicity and is reasonably effective in preventing local relapse and its neurologic sequelae, particularly for tumors other than lung cancers.

Performance status after treatment for squamous cell cancer of the base of tongue--a comparison of primary radiation therapy versus primary surgery.

PURPOSE: To compare the quality of life and functional outcome in patients with squamous cell cancer of the base of tongue treated with primary radiation vs. primary surgery. METHODS AND MATERIALS: At our institution, patients with base of tongue cancer are primarily treated either by radiation or surgery depending upon the philosophy of their primary physician. Primary radiation consists of 45-54 Gy external beam radiation followed by an 192Ir implant delivering an additional 20-30 Gy over 2-3 days. A neck dissection is done at the same time as the implant for those with involved nodes. Primary surgery consists of resection of the base of tongue lesion, neck dissection and postoperative radiation therapy. Because both groups have similar local control in our experience (80-90%), we used a subjective performance status scale for head and neck cancer patients to assess the quality of life in these patients (0-100, 0 = worst function, 100 = normal function). This scale measures ability to eat in public, understandability of speech, and normalcy of diet. There were 30 radiation patients (21: T1-T2; nine: T3-T4) and ten surgery patients (five: T1-T2; five: T3-T4) available for long-term quality of life assessment. RESULTS: Patients treated with radiation had consistently better performance status scores and quality of life according to our study. This was true for those with early (T1-2) as well as more advanced (T3-4) disease. For eating in public, T1-2 patients had scores of 85 vs. 75 (p = .31) and T3-4 patients had scores of 82 vs. 35 (p < .0001) for radiation vs. surgery, respectively. For understandability of speech, T1-2 patients had scores of 92 vs. 65 (p = .0021), and T3-4 patients had scores of 95 vs. 35 (p < .0001) for radiation vs. surgery, respectively. For normalcy of diet, T1-2 patients had scores of 74 vs. 50 (p = .047), and T3-4 patients had scores of 78 vs. 32 (p = .0012) for radiation vs. surgery, respectively. In addition, we compared scores for early vs. advanced disease treated by the same modality. For radiation, there was no difference in all three functional categories for T1-2 vs. T3-4 (p = .84), showing that quality of life scores remain high for all stages. For surgery, functional status deteriorated significantly when comparing T1-2 vs. T3-4 (p = .0014), consistent with the fact that larger tumors require more extensive operations. CONCLUSION: Radiation therapy provides a better performance status than surgery for base of tongue cancer. This is true for both early and advanced disease. Because radiation also provides similar local control and survival, our data suggests that radiation may be the preferred strategy. Functional scores remain high for all T stages treated with radiation, but deteriorate with more advanced T stages for patients treated with surgery. Similar studies using objective criteria are needed to further compare these treatments.

Combined modality therapy of extrahepatic biliary system cancer.

From January 1985 to December 1988, 10 patients with local/regional extrahepatic biliary system cancer (gallbladder: 2, Klatskin: 4, common bile duct: 4) underwent combined modality therapy. Laparotomy and biopsy or subtotal resection were performed in six patients and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, percutaneous transhepatic cholangiogram, and biliary drainage in four patients. Patients initially received 5000 cGy to the tumor bed and primary nodal area. Eight received an additional 1500 cGy boost to the tumor bed. Chemotherapy (5-FU/mitomycin-C) was delivered at the beginning of each radiation treatment course. Four patients received an additional 1-4 cycles of maintenance chemotherapy and six received a boost with brachytherapy. The mean survival was 32 months and the median survival was 16 months. Five patients are currently NED at 16, 17, 17, 48, and 52 months. The overall 3-year actuarial survival was 50%. The cumulative incidence of failure as a component of failure was local/regional: 50%, abdominal: 40%, and distant: 10%. Of the five patients who developed failure, all developed a component of local/regional failure. Our data show that this approach is feasible and offers similar results to those reported in the literature. However, further follow-up will be needed to determine if this combined modality approach offers improved local control and survival rates compared with surgery or biliary bypass/drainage alone.

Concomitant chemotherapy-radiation therapy followed by hyperfractionated radiation therapy for advanced unresectable head and neck cancer.

In January 1988, we initiated a prospective study evaluating a new treatment approach with chemotherapy and radiotherapy for unresectable head and neck cancer. Weeks 1-4 were the initial debulking phase. Radiotherapy was delivered using 1.8 Gy/day to large portals including gross disease and all areas at risk. Cisplatinum, 100mg/m2, was given concomitant with radiotherapy on days 1 and 22. Weeks 5 and 6 were the boosting phase. This involved twice-a-day irradiation. The AM fraction of 1.8 Gy was given to the entire area at risk, whereas the PM dose of 1.6 Gy was limited to the gross disease alone. Thus a total of 70 Gy/6 weeks was delivered. A total of 24 patients were treated, 22 of whom have completed this protocol and are evaluable. All patients had massive disease, with 15 having gross involvement of brain, orbit, skull base, or carotid artery. Follow-up ranged from 3-22 months (median 12 months). Major responses were achieved in 96%, with 64% complete responses and 32% partial responses. Two patients with PR were able to undergo complete surgical resection, making the overall rate of complete response, including surgery, 73%. At 1 year, actuarial survival was 69%, and local progression-free survival was 56%. Distant metastases developed in 5 (23%). This approach appears both safe and effective in producing excellent regression and local control for far advanced head and neck cancer. More time is needed to see if these results are sustained. Efforts to build upon this experience appear warranted.

Twice daily thoracic irradiation for limited small cell lung cancer.

Thoracic failure is a significant obstacle to the cure of limited stage small-cell lung cancer (LSCLC) patients treated with combined modality therapy. In 1985 we initiated a prospective trial to evaluate the impact of twice daily thoracic irradiation without concomitant chemotherapy on control of intrathoracic tumor in LSCLC. Twenty-nine patients treated in this fashion were compared with 36 patients treated from 1979-1982 with once daily thoracic irradiation and concomitant chemotherapy. Both groups received the same induction chemotherapy; cyclophosphamide, Adriamycin, and vincristine (CAV) alternating with cisplatin and etoposide. For consolidation, the twice daily patients received thoracic irradiation, 45 Gy in 1.5 Gy fractions given twice daily, and the once daily patients received thoracic irradiation, 45 Gy in 2.5 Gy fractions given once daily with concomitant cyclophosphamide and vincristine. After completion of radiotherapy both groups received maintenance chemotherapy. The complete response (CR) rate after thoracic irradiation was higher for twice daily patients (86% (25/29) compared to the once daily patients [61% (22/36), p = 0.02]. However, this advantage was offset by the shorter duration of thoracic control among CR patients treated with twice daily thoracic irradiation compared to once daily thoracic irradiation (32% vs 67% at 2 years, p less than 0.05). In view of the enhanced initial response of LSCLC to twice daily thoracic irradiation, this basic radiotherapeutic approach seems appropriate, but new strategies using higher doses of twice daily thoracic irradiation or concomitant chemotherapy appear to be necessary to enhance long-term thoracic control.

Acute intermittent porphyria in a native North American family. Biochemical and molecular analysis.

A native North American family with acute intermittent porphyria was investigated by molecular methods to locate the causative mutation and identify carriers of the mutant allele. All 15 exons of the porphobilinogen deaminase gene were screened by single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis, and a unique banding pattern was observed in exon 14. Sequencing revealed a one base-pair insertion in this exon that shifts the reading frame of the mRNA, and generates a premature stop codon. Family members were tested for the mutation by amplification of exon 14 followed by digestion with the restriction enzyme NlaIII. The activity of erythrocyte porphobilinogen deaminase was measured in 36 family members. The results agreed with mutational analysis in 32 cases. However, four individuals who were not gene carriers had low enzyme activity, and in the absence of molecular genetic data would have been incorrectly diagnosed. This is the first study to identify the molecular basis of acute intermittent porphyria in native North Americans.