Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol ; 35(6): e260-4, 2013 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23652868

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Osteoporosis is a leading cause of morbidity in patients affected by ß-thalassemia major or intermediate; we aimed to assess the association between demineralization observed in young thalassemic patients. METHODS: A total of 88 patients with ß-thalassemia were recruited at Microcitemia Center of Taranto Hospital under the Prevention Osteoporosis and Fractures research project from 2008 to 2010. All the patients were screened with both dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and quantitative ultrasound (QUS). T score and Z score values were obtained for each subject. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of demineralization was 84% with DXA and 70% with QUS, whereas normality was found in 16% of patients screened with DXA and in 30% of cases with QUS. Hypogonadism, hypothyroidism, diabetes mellitus, hepatitis-B, and the presence of previous fragility fractures were significantly associated with the demineralization status (lower T scores values) both with DXA and QUS. CONCLUSION: Our data confirm that DXA and QUS examinations are both useful for detecting bone demineralization in thalassemic patients.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas Óseas/diagnóstico por imagen , Osteoporosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Talasemia beta/complicaciones , Absorciometría de Fotón , Adulto , Anciano , Diabetes Mellitus , Femenino , Falanges de los Dedos de la Mano/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas Óseas/etiología , Hepatitis B/complicaciones , Humanos , Hipogonadismo/complicaciones , Hipotiroidismo/complicaciones , Italia , Vértebras Lumbares/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteoporosis/epidemiología , Osteoporosis/etiología , Prevalencia , Ultrasonografía , Adulto Joven
2.
N Engl J Med ; 351(23): 2384-91, 2004 Dec 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15575054

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In-hospital administration of flecainide and propafenone in a single oral loading dose has been shown to be effective and superior to placebo in terminating atrial fibrillation. We evaluated the feasibility and the safety of self-administered oral loading of flecainide and propafenone in terminating atrial fibrillation of recent onset outside the hospital. METHODS: We administered either flecainide or propafenone orally to restore sinus rhythm in 268 patients with mild heart disease or none who came to the emergency room with atrial fibrillation of recent onset that was hemodynamically well tolerated. Of these patients, 58 (22 percent) were excluded from the study because of treatment failure or side effects. Out-of-hospital self-administration of flecainide or propafenone--the "pill-in-the-pocket" approach--after the onset of heart palpitations was evaluated in the remaining 210 patients (mean age [+/-SD], 59+/-11 years). RESULTS: During a mean follow-up of 15+/-5 months, 165 patients (79 percent) had a total of 618 episodes of arrhythmia; of those episodes, 569 (92 percent) were treated 36+/-93 minutes after the onset of symptoms. Treatment was successful in 534 episodes (94 percent); the time to resolution of symptoms was 113+/-84 minutes. Among the 165 patients with recurrences, the drug was effective during all the arrhythmic episodes in 139 patients (84 percent). Adverse effects were reported during one or more arrhythmic episodes by 12 patients (7 percent), including atrial flutter at a rapid ventricular rate in 1 patient and noncardiac side effects in 11 patients. The numbers of monthly visits to the emergency room and hospitalizations were significantly lower during follow-up than during the year before the target episode (P<0.001 for both comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: In a selected, risk-stratified population of patients with recurrent atrial fibrillation, pill-in-the-pocket treatment is feasible and safe, with a high rate of compliance by patients, a low rate of adverse events, and a marked reduction in emergency room visits and hospital admissions.


Asunto(s)
Antiarrítmicos/uso terapéutico , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Flecainida/uso terapéutico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/complicaciones , Propafenona/uso terapéutico , Administración Oral , Atención Ambulatoria , Antiarrítmicos/administración & dosificación , Antiarrítmicos/efectos adversos , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Flecainida/administración & dosificación , Flecainida/efectos adversos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Propafenona/administración & dosificación , Propafenona/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Autoadministración , Volumen Sistólico
3.
Ital Heart J Suppl ; 6(6): 335-40, 2005 Jun.
Artículo en Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16013424

RESUMEN

In patients with not very frequent episodes of atrial fibrillation (AF), highly symptomatic for palpitation, hemodynamically well tolerated but long enough to require emergency room (ER) intervention, the best outpatient treatment appears to be the "pill-in-the-pocket" approach. In several studies, in-hospital administration of flecainide or propafenone in a single oral loading dose has been shown to be effective and superior to placebo in terminating recent-onset AF. Recently, a multicenter Italian study has been carried out to evaluate the feasibility and the safety of self-administered oral loading of flecainide or propafenone in terminating AF of recent onset outside the hospital. Either flecainide or propafenone were administered orally to restore sinus rhythm in 268 patients with mild heart disease or none, who came to the ER with AF of recent onset that was hemodynamically well tolerated. Of these patients, 21% were excluded from the study because of treatment failure or side effects. During a mean follow-up of 15 months, 94% of the arrhythmic episodes were interrupted by the oral loading of flecainide or propafenone; the mean time to resolution of symptoms was about 2 hours. Adverse effects were reported during one or more arrhythmic episodes by 7% of the patients, including atrial flutter at a rapid ventricular rate in 1 patient. The numbers of monthly visits to the ER and hospitalizations were 90% lower during follow-up than the year before enrollment. These results show that in a selected, risk-stratified population of patients with recurrent AF, the "pill-in-the-pocket" treatment is feasible and safe, with a high rate of compliance by patients, a low rate of adverse effects, and a marked reduction in ER visits. Some recommendations on the practical use of this type of treatment are given.


Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria , Antiarrítmicos/uso terapéutico , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Flecainida/uso terapéutico , Propafenona/uso terapéutico , Administración Oral , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Antiarrítmicos/administración & dosificación , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Quimioterapia Combinada , Estudios de Factibilidad , Flecainida/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Italia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Propafenona/administración & dosificación , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol ; 29(7): 727-32, 2006 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16884508

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) has been linked to increased prevalence and recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF). We hypothesized that OSA may aggravate AF in patients with pacemakers implanted for sinus bradycardia who had documented paroxysmal AF. METHODS: Seventy-two patients (36 M, aged 77 +/- 6 years) completed the study. All patients received a dual-chamber pacemaker equipped with diagnostic and preventive functions for AF. OSA was diagnosed with the Berlin Questionnaire, which is validated to identify patients with OSA. Four-month continuous pacemaker recordings were collected for all patients. RESULTS: OSA was diagnosed in 28% of patients. Patients at high risk for OSA (HR group) and patients at low risk for OSA (LR group) were equivalent for gender, age, and body mass index. The rate of hypertension was higher in HR than in LR group (90% vs 44%, P < 0.01). The prevalence of paroxysmal AF during the study period was similar in HR and LR group (53% vs 44%, P = NS). Overall number of AF episodes per month was not significantly different between HR and LR group (7 +/- 13 vs 36 +/- 122, P = NS). Similarly, AF burden (AF%) was not significantly different between HR and LR group (0.3 +/- 0.6 vs 2.0 +/- 4.8, P = NS). Circadian distribution of AF episodes was similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Long-term pacemaker recording of AF recurrence, AF burden, and its circadian distribution is similar in patients with paroxysmal AF at high risk for OSA and those at low risk for OSA.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial/etiología , Fibrilación Atrial/terapia , Marcapaso Artificial , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/complicaciones , Anciano , Fibrilación Atrial/fisiopatología , Ritmo Circadiano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Recurrencia , Medición de Riesgo , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/diagnóstico , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/fisiopatología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA