Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Ann Oncol ; 23(7): 1912-8, 2012 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22258366

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cancer patients want access to reliable information about currently recruiting clinical trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Oncologists and their patients were randomly assigned to access a consumer-friendly cancer clinical trials web site [Australian Cancer Trials (ACT), www.australiancancertrials.gov.au] or to usual care in a cluster randomized controlled trial. The primary outcome, measured from audio recordings of oncologist-patient consultations, was the proportion of patients with whom participation in any clinical trial was discussed. Analysis was by intention-to-treat accounting for clustering and stratification. RESULTS: Thirty medical oncologists and 493 patients were recruited. Overall, 46% of consultations in the intervention group compared with 34% in the control group contained a discussion about clinical trials (P=0.08). The mean consultation length in both groups was 29 min (P=0.69). The proportion consenting to a trial was 10% in both groups (P=0.65). Patients' knowledge about randomized trials was lower in the intervention than the control group (mean score 3.0 versus 3.3, P=0.03) but decisional conflict scores were similar (mean score 42 versus 43, P=0.83). CONCLUSIONS: Good communication between patients and physicians is essential. Within this context, a web site such as Australian Cancer Trials may be an important tool to encourage discussion about clinical trial participation.


Asunto(s)
Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Australia , Toma de Decisiones , Servicios de Información sobre Medicamentos , Femenino , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Difusión de la Información , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prioridad del Paciente , Selección de Paciente , Médicos
2.
Patient Educ Couns ; 44(3): 215-25, 2001 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11553422

RESUMEN

This multicenter study evaluated the impact of genetic counseling in 218 women at risk of developing hereditary breast cancer. Women were assessed prior to counseling and 12-month post-counseling using self-administered, mailed questionnaires. Compared to baseline, breast cancer genetics knowledge was increased significantly at follow-up, and greater increases in knowledge were associated with educational level. Breast cancer anxiety decreased significantly from baseline to follow-up, and these decreases were associated with improvements in perceived risk. A significant decrease in clinical breast examination was observed at the 12-month follow-up. Findings suggest that women with a family history of breast cancer benefit from attending familial cancer clinics as it leads to increases in breast cancer genetics knowledge and decreases in breast cancer anxiety. The lowered rates of clinical breast examination indicate that the content of genetic counseling may need to be reviewed to ensure that women receive and take away the right message.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Asesoramiento Genético , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Adaptación Psicológica , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Australia , Neoplasias de la Mama/prevención & control , Neoplasias de la Mama/psicología , Femenino , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadísticas no Paramétricas
3.
Med J Aust ; 167(10): 521-4, 1997 Nov 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9397038

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To establish the extent of women's knowledge of mammographic screening, particularly in relation to the national screening program, BreastScreen Australia, and to estimate the proportion of women who are participating in screening both within and outside BreastScreen Australia. DESIGN AND SETTING: Validated prospective telephone survey of women aged 30-69 years selected at random from across Australia. PARTICIPANTS: 2935 women with no previous breast cancer diagnosis. RESULTS: The adjusted response rate was 64%. Almost 90% of women had heard of the national program; only 1% correctly stated that screening is for asymptomatic women. 60% correctly identified the current recommended age of starting screening is about 50 years of age; 26% thought screening should begin at about 40 years of age. Approximately 60% correctly reported that the recommended screening interval is every two years; 27% thought screening should be done annually. 55% reported ever having had a mammogram, and 37% reported having had at least one screening mammogram. Among women in the target age group (50-69 years) about 70% reported ever having had a screening mammogram, and about 50% reported having had a screening mammogram within the national program in the last two years. Among women aged 40-49 years, 29% reported ever having had a screening mammogram, and 22% reported having been screened in the last two years. CONCLUSIONS: Awareness of the national screening program is high, but some women do not know the purpose of screening, the target age group and the recommended screening interval. Compliance with screening is good among women in the target age group; many women in their 40s are also participating in screening.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/prevención & control , Educación en Salud/normas , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Mamografía , Tamizaje Masivo , Adulto , Anciano , Australia , Escolaridad , Femenino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Derivación y Consulta , Características de la Residencia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA