Progress and challenges in predicting protein-protein interaction sites.

The identification of protein-protein interaction sites is an essential intermediate step for mutant design and the prediction of protein networks. In recent years a significant number of methods have been developed to predict these interface residues and here we review the current status of the field. Progress in this area requires a clear view of the methodology applied, the data sets used for training and testing the systems, and the evaluation procedures. We have analysed the impact of a representative set of features and algorithms and highlighted the problems inherent in generating reliable protein data sets and in the posterior analysis of the results. Although it is clear that there have been some improvements in methods for predicting interacting sites, several major bottlenecks remain. Proteins in complexes are still under-represented in the structural databases and in particular many proteins involved in transient complexes are still to be crystallized. We provide suggestions for effective feature selection, and make it clear that community standards for testing, training and performance measures are necessary for progress in the field.

CCHMM_PROF: a HMM-based coiled-coil predictor with evolutionary information.

MOTIVATION: The widespread coiled-coil structural motif in proteins is known to mediate a variety of biological interactions. Recognizing a coiled-coil containing sequence and locating its coiled-coil domains are key steps towards the determination of the protein structure and function. Different tools are available for predicting coiled-coil domains in protein sequences, including those based on position-specific score matrices and machine learning methods. RESULTS: In this article, we introduce a hidden Markov model (CCHMM_PROF) that exploits the information contained in multiple sequence alignments (profiles) to predict coiled-coil regions. The new method discriminates coiled-coil sequences with an accuracy of 97% and achieves a true positive rate of 79% with only 1% of false positives. Furthermore, when predicting the location of coiled-coil segments in protein sequences, the method reaches an accuracy of 80% at the residue level and a best per-segment and per-protein efficiency of 81% and 80%, respectively. The results indicate that CCHMM_PROF outperforms all the existing tools and can be adopted for large-scale genome annotation. AVAILABILITY: The dataset is available at http://www.biocomp.unibo.it/ approximately lisa/coiled-coils. The predictor is freely available at http://gpcr.biocomp.unibo.it/cgi/predictors/cchmmprof/pred_cchmmprof.cgi. CONTACT: piero@biocomp.unibo.it.

The pros and cons of predicting protein contact maps.

Is there any reason why we should predict contact maps (CMs)? The question is one of the several 'NP-hard' questions that arise when striving for feasible solutions of the protein folding problem. At some point, theoreticians started thinking that a possible alternative to an unsolvable problem was to predict a simplified version of the protein structure: a CM. In this chapter, we will clarify that whenever problems are difficult they remain at least as difficult in the process of finding approximate solutions or heuristic approaches. However, humans rarely give up, as it is stimulating to find solutions in the face of difficulties. CMs of proteins are an interesting and useful representation of protein structures. These two-dimensional representations capture all the important features of a protein fold. We will review the general characteristics of CMs and the methods developed to study and predict them, and we will highlight some new ideas on how to improve CM predictions.

A computational approach for detecting peptidases and their specific inhibitors at the genome level.

BACKGROUND: Peptidases are proteolytic enzymes responsible for fundamental cellular activities in all organisms. Apparently about 2-5% of the genes encode for peptidases, irrespectively of the organism source. The basic peptidase function is "protein digestion" and this can be potentially dangerous in living organisms when it is not strictly controlled by specific inhibitors. In genome annotation a basic question is to predict gene function. Here we describe a computational approach that can filter peptidases and their inhibitors out of a given proteome. Furthermore and as an added value to MEROPS, a specific database for peptidases already available in the public domain, our method can predict whether a pair of peptidase/inhibitor can interact, eventually listing all possible predicted ligands (peptidases and/or inhibitors). RESULTS: We show that by adopting a decision-tree approach the accuracy of PROSITE and HMMER in detecting separately the four major peptidase types (Serine, Aspartic, Cysteine and Metallo- Peptidase) and their inhibitors among a non redundant set of globular proteins can be improved by some percentage points with respect to that obtained with each method separately. More importantly, our method can then predict pairs of peptidases and interacting inhibitors, scoring a joint global accuracy of 99% with coverage for the positive cases (peptidase/inhibitor) close to 100% and a correlation coefficient of 0.91%. In this task the decision-tree approach outperforms the single methods. CONCLUSION: The decision-tree can reliably classify protein sequences as peptidases or inhibitors, belonging to a certain class, and can provide a comprehensive list of possible interacting pairs of peptidase/inhibitor. This information can help the design of experiments to detect interacting peptidase/inhibitor complexes and can speed up the selection of possible interacting candidates, without searching for them separately and manually combining the obtained results. A web server specifically developed for annotating peptidases and their inhibitors (HIPPIE) is available at http://gpcr.biocomp.unibo.it/cgi/predictors/hippie/pred_hippie.cgi.

Hip muscle imbalance and low back pain in athletes: influence of core strengthening.

PURPOSE: The influence of a core-strengthening program on low back pain (LBP) occurrence and hip strength differences were studied in NCAA Division I collegiate athletes. METHODS: In 1998, 1999, and 2000, hip strength was measured during preparticipation physical examinations and occurrence of LBP was monitored throughout the year. Following the 1999-2000 preparticipation physicals, all athletes began participation in a structured core-strengthening program, which emphasized abdominal, paraspinal, and hip extensor strengthening. Incidence of LBP and the relationship with hip muscle imbalance were compared between consecutive academic years. RESULTS: After incorporation of core strengthening, there was no statistically significant change in LBP occurrence. Side-to-side extensor strength between athletes participating in both the 1998-1999 and 1999-2000 physicals were no different. After core strengthening, the right hip extensor was, on average, stronger than that of the left hip extensor (P = 0.0001). More specific gender differences were noted after core strengthening. Using logistic regression, female athletes with weaker left hip abductors had a more significant probability of requiring treatment for LBP (P = 0.009) CONCLUSION: The impact of core strengthening on collegiate athletes has not been previously examined. These results indicated no significant advantage of core strengthening in reducing LBP occurrence, though this may be more a reflection of the small numbers of subjects who actually required treatment. The core program, however, seems to have had a role in modifying hip extensor strength balance. The association between hip strength and future LBP occurrence, observed only in females, may indicate the need for more gender-specific core programs. The need for a larger scale study to examine the impact of core strengthening in collegiate athletes is demonstrated.

The bologna annotation resource: a non hierarchical method for the functional and structural annotation of protein sequences relying on a comparative large-scale genome analysis.

Protein sequence annotation is a major challenge in the postgenomic era. Thanks to the availability of complete genomes and proteomes, protein annotation has recently taken invaluable advantage from cross-genome comparisons. In this work, we describe a new non hierarchical clustering procedure characterized by a stringent metric which ensures a reliable transfer of function between related proteins even in the case of multidomain and distantly related proteins. The method takes advantage of the comparative analysis of 599 completely sequenced genomes, both from prokaryotes and eukaryotes, and of a GO and PDB/SCOP mapping over the clusters. A statistical validation of our method demonstrates that our clustering technique captures the essential information shared between homologous and distantly related protein sequences. By this, uncharacterized proteins can be safely annotated by inheriting the annotation of the cluster. We validate our method by blindly annotating other 201 genomes and finally we develop BAR (the Bologna Annotation Resource), a prediction server for protein functional annotation based on a total of 800 genomes (publicly available at http://microserf.biocomp.unibo.it/bar/).