Evaluation of VIDAS UP Listeria assay (LPT) for the detection of Listeria in a variety of foods and environmental surfaces: First Action 2013.10.

The VIDAS UP Listeria (LPT) is an automated rapid screening enzyme phage-ligand based assay for the detection of Listeria species in human food products and environmental samples. The VIDAS LPT method was compared in a multi-laboratory collaborative study to AOAC Official Method 993.12 Listeria monocytogenes in Milk and Dairy Products reference method following current AOAC guidelines. A total of 14 laboratories participated, representing government and industry, throughout the United States. One matrix, queso fresco (soft Mexican cheese), was analyzed using two different test portion sizes, 25 and 125 g. Samples representing each test portion size were artificially contaminated with Listeria species at three levels, an uninoculated control level [0 colony-forming units (CFU)/test portion], a low-inoculum level (0.2-2 CFU/test portion), and a high-inoculum level (2-5 CFU/test portion). For this evaluation, 1800 unpaired replicate test portions were analyzed by either the VIDAS LPT or AOAC 993.12. Each inoculation level was analyzed using the Probability of Detection (POD) statistical model. For the low-level inoculated test portions, difference in collaborator POD (dLPOD) values of 0.01, (-0.10, 0.13), with 95% confidence intervals, were obtained for both 25 and 125 g test portions. The range of the confidence intervals for dLPOD values for both the 25 and 125 g test portions contains the point 0.0 indicating no statistically significant difference in the number of positive samples detected between the VIDAS LPT and the AOAC methods. In addition to Oxford agar, VIDAS LPT test portions were confirmed using Agar Listeria Ottavani and Agosti (ALOA), a proprietary chromogenic agar for the identification and differentiation of L. monocytogenes and Listeria species. No differences were observed between the two selective agars. The VIDAS LPT method, with the optional ALOA agar confirmation method, was adopted as Official First Action status for the detection of Listeria species in a variety of foods and environmental samples.

Evaluation of VIDAS Listeria monocytogenes Xpress (LMX) for the detection of Listeria monocytogenes in a variety of foods: First Action 2013.11.

The VIDAS Listeria monocytogenes Xpress (LMX) is an automated rapid screening enzyme immunoassay for the detection of Listeria monocytogenes in food products. The VIDAS LMX method was compared in a multi-laboratory collaborative study to AOAC Official Method 993.12 Listeria monocytogenes in Milk and Dairy Products reference method following current AOAC guidelines. A total of 14 laboratories participated, representing government and industry, throughout the United States. One matrix, queso fresco (soft Mexican cheese), was analyzed using two different test portion sizes, 25 and 125 g. Samples representing each portion size were artificially contaminated with L. monocytogenes at three levels: an uninoculated control level [0 colony forming units (CFU)/test portion], a low inoculum level (0.2-2 CFU/test portion), and a high inoculum level (2-5 CFU/test portion). For this evaluation, 1800 unpaired replicate test portions were analyzed by either the VIDAS LMX or AOAC 993.12. Each level was analyzed using the Probability of Detection (POD) statistical model. For the low-level inoculated test portions, difference in collaborator POD (dLPOD) values of 0.04, (-0.08, 0.15) and 0.01, (-0.10, 0.13), with 95% confidence intervals, were obtained, respectively, for 25 and 125 g test portions. The range of the confidence intervals for dLPOD values for both the 25 and 125 g test portions contain the point 0.0 indicating no statistically significant difference in the number of positive samples detected between the VIDAS LMX and the AOAC method. In addition to Oxford Agar (OXA), VIDAS LMX test portions were confirmed using Agar Listeria Ottavani and Agosti (ALOA), a proprietary chromogenic agar for the identification and differentiation of L. monocytogenes and Listeria species. No differences were observed between the two selective agars. The VIDAS LMX method, with the optional ALOA agar confirmation method, was adopted as Official First Action status for the detection of L. monocytogenes in a variety of foods.

Detection of Salmonella species in a variety of foods by the DuPont Bax system real-time PCR assay for Salmonella: first action 2013.02.

A multilaboratory study was conducted to evaluate the ability of the DuPont BAX System Real-Time PCR Assay for Salmonella to detect the target species in a variety of foods and environmental surfaces. Internal validation studies were performed by DuPont Nutrition & Health on 24 different sample types to demonstrate the reliability of the test method among a wide variety of sample types. Two of these matrixes-pork and turkey frankfurters and pasteurized, not-from-concentrate orange juice without pulp-were each evaluated in 14 independent laboratories as part of the collaborative study to demonstrate repeatability and reproducibility of the internal laboratory results independent of the end user. Frankfurter samples were evaluated against the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service reference method as a paired study, while orange juice samples were evaluated against the U.S. Food and Drug Administration reference method as an unpaired study, using a proprietary media for the test method. Samples tested in this study were artificially inoculated with a Salmonella strain at levels expected to produce low (0.2-2.0 CFU/test portion) or high (5 CFU/test portion) spike levels on the day of analysis. For each matrix, the collaborative study failed to show a statistically significant difference between the candidate method and the reference method using the probability of detection statistical model.

Evaluation of 3M molecular detection assay (MDA) Salmonella for the detection of Salmonella in selected foods: collaborative study.

The 3M Molecular Detection Assay (MDA) Salmonella is used with the 3M Molecular Detection System for the detection of Salmonella spp. in food, food-related, and environmental samples after enrichment. The assay utilizes loop-mediated isothermal amplification to rapidly amplify Salmonella target DNA with high specificity and sensitivity, combined with bioluminescence to detect the amplification. The 3M MDA Salmonella method was compared using an unpaired study design in a multilaboratory collaborative study to the U.S. Department of Agriculture/Food Safety and Inspection Service-Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook (USDA/FSIS-MLG 4.05), Isolation and Identification of Salmonella from Meat, Poultry, Pasteurized Egg and Catfish Products for raw ground beef and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration/Bacteriological Analytical Manual (FDA/BAM) Chapter 5 Salmonella reference method for wet dog food following the current AOAC guidelines. A total of 20 laboratories participated. For the 3M MDA Salmonella method, raw ground beef was analyzed using 25 g test portions, and wet dog food was analyzed using 375 g test portions. For the reference methods, 25 g test portions of each matrix were analyzed. Each matrix was artificially contaminated with Salmonella at three inoculation levels: an uninoculated control level (0 CFU/test portion), a low inoculum level (0.2-2 CFU/test portion), and a high inoculum level (2-5 CFU/test portion). In this study, 1512 unpaired replicate samples were analyzed. Statistical analysis was conducted according to the probability of detection (POD). For the low-level raw ground beef test portions, the following dLPOD (difference between the POD of the reference and candidate method) values with 95% confidence intervals were obtained: -0.01 (-0.14, +0.12). For the low-level wet dog food test portions, the following dLPOD with 95% confidence intervals were obtained: -0.04 (-0.16, +0.09). No significant differences were observed in the number of positive samples detected by the 3M MDA Salmonella method versus either the USDA/FSIS-MLG or FDA/BAM methods.

Evaluation of VIDAS UP Salmonella (SPT) assay for the detection of Salmonella in a variety of foods and environmental samples: collaborative study.

The VIDAS UP Salmonella (SPT) uses recombinant phage proteins to detect Salmonella species in human and animal food products and production environmental samples after 18-26 h of enrichment. The VIDAS SPT assay is performed with the automated VIDAS or mini-VIDAS instruments. The VIDAS SPT method was compared in a multilaboratory collaborative study to the U.S. Department of Agriculture/Food Safety and Inspection Service-Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook (USDA/FSIS-MLG) 4.05 (2011) Isolation and Identification of Salmonella from Meat, Poultry, Pasteurized Egg and Catfish Products reference method following the current AOAC guidelines. A total of 15 laboratories representing government, academia, and industry throughout the United States participated. One matrix, raw ground beef, was analyzed using two different test portion sizes, 25 and 375 g. Each test portion was artificially contaminated with Salmonella at three inoculation levels, an uninoculated control level (0 CFU/test portion), a low inoculum level (0.2-2 CFUltest portion), and a high inoculum level (2-5 CFU/test portion). In this study, 1656 unpaired replicate samples were analyzed. Of those unpaired replicates, 476 were presumptive positive by the VIDAS method, with 475 confirmed positive by the traditional confirmation procedures and 476 confirmed positive by an alternative confirmation procedure. There were 411 confirmed positive replicates by the USDA/FSIS-MLG reference method. Statistical analysis was conducted according to the probability of detection (POD). For the low-level 375 g test portions, the following dLPOD values, with 95% confidence intervals, were obtained: 0.01 (-0.12, +0.15) for samples confirmed following the traditional confirmation; 0.02 (-0.18, +0.2) for samples confirmed following traditional confirmation on IBISA and ASAP; and 0.03 (-0.18, +0.24) for samples confirmed following the alternative confirmation on IBISA and ASAP. For the low-level 25 g test portions, the following dLPOD values, with 95% confidence intervals, were obtained: 0.41, (0.32, +0.49) for samples confirmed following the traditional confirmation, the traditional confirmation on IBISA and ASAP, and the alternative confirmation on IBISA and ASAP. With 0.0 within the confidence intervals for the 375 g test portions, there was no statistically significant difference in the number of positive samples detected by the VIDAS SPT method and the USDA/FSIS-MLG method at the 0.05 level. For the 25 g test portions, a statistically significant difference was observed between the VIDAS SPT method and the reference method for the low inoculum level, where the VIDAS SPT method recovered a higher number of positive results than the reference method. It is recommended that the VIDAS SPT method with the optional ASAP and IBISA agar confirmation method be adopted for Official First Action status for the detection of Salmonella in a variety of foods and environmental samples.

Validation of the Assurance® GDS for Cronobacter Tq II in Infant Formulas, Infant Cereals, Ingredients, and Environmental Samples Collaborative Study: First Action 2021.08.

BACKGROUND: The Assurance® GDS for Cronobacter Tq II assay is a nucleic acid amplification system for the qualitative detection of Cronobacter. The method uses an upfront concentration of the target organism from the enrichment by immunomagnetic separation (IMS) using the PickPen® device. OBJECTIVE: The Assurance GDS for Cronobacter Tq II method was evaluated for Official Methods of AnalysisSM certification. METHOD: The matrix was compared to the ISO 22964:2017: Microbiology of the Food Chain-Horizontal Method for the Detection of Cronobacter spp. standard and using an alternative confirmation procedure. The alternative method was evaluated using 10 g test portions in an unpaired study design for powdered infant formula (milk based with iron and DHA) containing probiotics. Eleven technicians from eight laboratories located within the United States and Europe participated in the collaborative study. Statistical analysis was conducted according to the probability of detection (POD) statistical model as presented in the AOAC validation guidelines. The difference in laboratory POD (dLPODC) values with 95% confidence intervals across collaborators was calculated for each level between the candidate and reference method results and between the candidate presumptive and confirmed results. RESULTS: Results obtained for the low inoculum level test portions produced a dLPOD value with a 95% confidence interval of 0.03 (-0.18, 0.15). The dLPOD results indicate equivalence between the candidate method and reference method for the matrix evaluated. The method also demonstrated acceptable inter-laboratory reproducibility as determined in the collaborative evaluation. There were no false negative results; the false positive rate was determined and produced a value of <2%. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the data generated, the method demonstrated Assurance GDS for Cronobacter Tq II assay produced acceptable interlaboratory reproducibility data and statistical analysis. HIGHLIGHTS: The Assurance GDS for Cronobacter Tq II method is suitable for the rapid qualitative detection of Cronobacter in infant formulas, infant cereals, ingredients, and environmental samples.

Validation of MICA Legionella for Enumeration of Legionella pneumophila in Sanitary Waters and Cooling Tower Waters: AOAC Performance Tested MethodSM 032201.

BACKGROUND: Frequent testing for Legionella concentration in water is required by most health risk monitoring organizations worldwide. Domestic hot water and cooling tower water networks must be regularly controlled to prevent Legionnaires' disease, a potentially deadly lung infection. MICA Legionella is the fastest culture-based detection method for all serogroups of Legionella pneumophila, with automatic enumeration in 48 h and no need for confirmation. OBJECTIVE: This study compares the performance and robustness of MICA Legionella with the reference method ISO 11731:2017 for the enumeration of culturable L. pneumophila. METHODS: MICA Legionella and ISO 11731:2017 results were compared for domestic hot water and cooling tower water. Inclusivity and exclusivity were tested on reference and environmental strains. Ruggedness, lot-to-lot consistency, and stability of the reagents kit were also studied. RESULTS: Enumeration of L. pneumophila by MICA Legionella was statistically equivalent to ISO 11731:2017 in both matrixes. In cooling tower waters, MICA Legionella showed better sensitivity than ISO 11731:2017. It presented a 94% sensitivity and a 97% specificity. CONCLUSION: MICA Legionella is a highly sensitive and specific method for culturable L. pneumophila enumeration. It presents, in 48 hours, equivalent or better results than ISO 11731:2017. Its protocol is robust to variations. Its reagents kit is stable for up to 18 months. HIGHLIGHTS: MICA Legionella is a robust and reliable method for the enumeration of culturable L. pneumophila in domestic and cooling tower water. It reduces significantly the number of sample pretreatments required in ISO 11731:2017. Automatic identification and enumeration of L. pneumophila microcolonies eliminates the requirement to have skilled analysts and limits the results variability. It also greatly reduces the time to results to 48 h instead of 7-10 days with ISO 11731:2017 while providing statistically equivalent results.

Validation of the KangarooSci® Aerobic Count Plate for the Enumeration of Meosphilic Aerobic Bacteria in Selected Foods and on Stainless Steel Environmental Surfaces: AOAC Performance Tested MethodSM 062301.

BACKGROUND: The KangarooSci® Aerobic Count Plate (ACP) is a sample-ready culture medium system for direct counting of aerobic bacteria colonies after 48-72 h of incubation. OBJECTIVE: The KangarooSci ACP was evaluated for AOAC Performance Tested MethodsSM certification. METHODS: The KangarooSci ACP was evaluated through matrix studies and product consistency/stability study and robustness testing. For the matrix study, nine food products (nonfat dry milk powder, fresh raw bovine milk, pasteurized liquid bovine milk, fresh raw ground beef, frozen uncooked chicken breast, cooked shredded pork, apple juice, ice cream, and fresh strawberries), and one environmental surface (stainless steel) were evaluated following the KangarooSci ACP product instructions and compared to the ISO 4833-1:2013, Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs-Horizontal methods for the enumeration of microorganisms-Part 1: Colony count at 30 °C by the pour plate technique reference standard. The product consistency and stability testing evaluated three separate production lots of the KangarooSci ACP. The robustness testing examined three test parameters, volume of sample plated, incubation time, and incubation temperature, using a factorial study design. RESULTS: Results from the matrix study demonstrated equivalent performance between the KangarooSci ACP and the ISO 4833-1:2013 reference standard. The product consistency and stability testing showed that the performance of the assay was equivalent over time up to 12 months and between production lots. Minor changes to the operational test conditions showed no significant impact on performance during the robustness testing. CONCLUSION: The KangarooSci ACP is an effective method for aerobic plate count for all matrixes evaluated. HIGHLIGHTS: The KangarooSci ACP allows for fast, reliable enumeration of aerobic bacteria. Utilizing the alternative method takes up less space in incubators, requires no sample spreader, and requires fewer consumables compared to the reference method.

Validation of the AquaCHROM™ ECC for the Detection and Enumeration of Coliforms and Escherichia coli in Water Samples: AOAC Performance Tested MethodSM 072202.

BACKGROUND: The AquaCHROM™ ECC method from CHROMagar is intended for the detection and enumeration of Escherichia coli and coliform bacteria in 100 mL water samples after 18-24 h of incubation at 35-37°C. OBJECTIVE: To validate the AquaCHROM ECC method for qualitative and quantitative detection of E. coli and coliforms with different water matrixes. METHODS: Inclusivity/exclusivity studies were conducted. AquaCHROM ECC was compared to U.S. cultural reference methods in unpaired matrix studies for detection of E. coli and coliforms in tap water, well water, lake water, and bottled water, and for enumeration in tap water, well water, and lake water. Three production lots of AquaCHROM ECC were tested for product consistency and stability. Variations in incubation time and temperature were evaluated in robustness testing. RESULTS: Inclusivity/exclusivity results demonstrated expected performance with the exception of three strains of Salmonella enterica, two species of Shigella, and one strain of Aeromonas, which turned the media blue or yellow. Results from the matrix studies demonstrated that AquaCHROM ECC and the reference methods are not statistically different for detection of E. coli and coliforms and statistically equivalent for enumeration of E. coli and coliforms. The AquaCHROM ECC powder production was proven to be consistent with a 24-month shelf life. Variation in temperature did not affect the method performance. Shortening the incubation time is not recommended. CONCLUSION: AquaCHROM ECC is an effective method for the detection and enumeration of E. coli and coliforms for the water matrixes evaluated. HIGHLIGHTS: The AquaCHROM ECC method is a quick, one-step method for the recovery and enumeration of E. coli and coliforms in 100 mL water samples. It is a non-agar-based chromogenic medium which provides a clear result without the use of a UV lamp.

Evaluation of the VITEK 2 gram positive (GP) microbial identification test card: collaborative study.

A collaborative study was conducted to evaluate the performance of the VITEK 2 Gram Positive (GP) identification card for use with the VITEK 2 automated microbial identification system. The GP test card is used in the identification of selected Gram positive organisms, including Listeria and Staphylococcus species. The VITEK 2 GP card is based on 43 biochemical tests measuring carbon source utilization, inhibition and resistance, and enzymatic activities. A total of 20 laboratories representing government, industry, and private testing laboratories throughout the United States participated. In this study, 720 Gram-positive inclusivity isolates were analyzed by the GP Identification method. Of the 720 well-characterized isolates, 714 were identified correctly, zero were misidentified, zero were unidentified, and six were not characterized as a Gram-positive organism by the VITEK 2 GP method. Additionally, 120 strains exclusive of Gram-positive organisms were screened by Gram stain. A total of 106 isolates were correctly excluded. Fourteen organisms were incorrectly characterized by Gram stain procedures, thus resulting in improper analysis and misidentification by VITEK GP. The VITEK 2 GP identification method is an acceptable automated method for the rapid identification of selected Gram-positive bacteria.

Evaluation of the VITEK 2 Gram-negative (GN) microbial identification test card: collaborative study.

A collaborative study was conducted to evaluate the performance of the VITEK 2 Gram-negative (GN) Identification card for use with the VITEK 2 automated microbial identification system. The GN test card is used in the identification of fermenting and nonfermenting Gram-negative bacilli, including the select agent organisms Brucella melitensis, Francisella tularensis, Burkholderia mallei, B. pseudomallei, and Yersinia pestis. The VITEK 2 GN card is based on 47 biochemical tests measuring carbon source utilization, inhibition and resistance, and enzymatic activities. A total of 20 laboratories representing government, industry, and private testing facilities throughout the United States participated. In this study, 720 Gram-negative inclusivity isolates were analyzed by the GN Identification method. Of the 720 well-characterized isolates, 707 were identified correctly, 0 were misidentified, 0 were unidentified, and 13 were not characterized as a Gram-negative organism. Additionally, 120 isolates exclusive of fermenting and nonfermenting Gram-negative bacilli were screened by Gram stain. A total of 117 isolates were correctly excluded. Three organisms were incorrectly characterized by Gram stain procedures, resulting in incorrect analysis and misidentification by VITEK 2 GN. The VITEK 2 GN identification method is an acceptable automated method for the rapid identification of Gram-negative bacteria.

Validation of the Clear Safety Listeria Method for Detection of Listeria Species in Hot Dogs and on Environmental Surface Matrixes: AOAC Performance Tested MethodSM 091901.

BACKGROUND: The Clear Safety Listeria method utilizes polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification and targeted next-generation sequencing technology to detect Listeria species (L. monocytogenes, L. innocua, L. ivanovii, L. marthii, L. grayi, L. welshimeri, and L. seeligeri) in hot dogs and on selected environmental surfaces. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to validate the candidate method according to current AOAC guidelines. METHOD: The candidate method was compared to the reference method for hot dogs and the environmental surfaces. The method was also evaluated for inclusivity and exclusivity using 50 inclusivity strains and 30 exclusivity strains for each reported target. Product consistency and stability was tested and robustness was evaluated with changes in enrichment temperature, volume of sample treatment, and aliquot volume for PCR. RESULTS: The candidate method demonstrated no statistically significant differences using the probability of detection model between candidate and reference methods or between presumptive and confirmed results for all environmental surfaces and hot dogs. Additionally, the candidate method detected all inclusivity organisms and excluded all exclusivity organisms for each reported target. Product lots were shown to be consistent and data supported the kit's shelf life. Finally, the robustness study demonstrated no statistical differences when the volume of sample or the aliquot volume for PCR was altered. Increasing the incubation temperature to 37 ± 1 °C resulted in greater recovery of L. monocytogenes as compared to 35 ± 1 °C and 30 ± 1 °C. CONCLUSIONS: The Clear Safety Listeria method is statistically equivalent to the reference methods for the detection of L. monocytogenes and Listeria spp. in hot dogs and on selected environmental surfaces. HIGHLIGHTS: The Clear Safety Listeria method is an automated, highthroughput NGS-based method capable of detecting Listeria species in the hot dog and environmental samples within 28h.

Evaluation of the Thermo ScientificTM SureTectTMListeria monocytogenes PCR Assay in a Broad Range of Foods and Selected Environmental Surfaces: Pre-Collaborative and Collaborative Study, First Action 2021.05.

BACKGROUND: The Thermo Scientific™ SureTect™ Listeria monocytogenes PCR Assay uses Solaris reagents for performing PCR for the rapid and specific detection of Listeria monocytogenes in a broad range of foods and selected environmental surfaces. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate reproducibility of the SureTect Listeria monocytogenes PCR Assay in a collaborative study using a challenging matrix, full-fat cottage cheese (25 g). To extend the scope of the method. METHOD: In the collaborative study, the candidate method was compared to the United States Food and Drug Administration/Bacteriological Analytical Manual (FDA/BAM) Chapter 10 Listeria reference method. The candidate method used two PCR thermocyclers, the Applied Biosystems™ QuantStudio™ 5 Real-Time PCR instrument (QS5) and the Applied Biosystems 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR instrument (7500 Fast). Eighteen participants from 10 laboratories located within the United States and Europe were solicited for the collaborative study, with 12 participants submitting valid data. Three levels of contamination were evaluated for each matrix. Statistical analysis was conducted according to the probability of detection (POD) statistical model. In addition, to extend the scope, six matrix studies were performed comparing the candidate method to the FDA/BAM reference method. One of these matrixes was also compared to the ISO 11290-1:2017 Microbiology of the Food Chain-Horizontal Method for the Detection and Enumeration of Listeria monocytogenes and of Listeria spp.-Part 1: Detection Method Reference Method. RESULTS: In the collaborative study, the difference in laboratory results indicates equivalence between the candidate method and reference method for the matrix evaluated, and the method demonstrated acceptable inter-laboratory reproducibility as determined in the collaborative evaluation. The two PCR instruments used in the study performed equivalently. All presumptive positives were confirmed via the alternative confirmation procedure. In the pre-collaborative studies, the results showed comparable performances between the candidate method and the reference method for all matrixes tested. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the data generated, the method demonstrated acceptable inter-laboratory reproducibility data and statistical analysis. HIGHLIGHTS: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, some participants had to be trained remotely. Additionally, 25 g full-fat cottage cheese is known to be a challenging matrix to test. No unusual cross-contamination or false positive/negative data were reported, highlighting the ease of use, reproducibility, and robustness of the method.

Independent Study for the Detectx Combined Assay for the Detection of Aspergillus, Salmonella, and STEC (stx1 and/or 2) in Dried Cannabis Flower and Dried Hemp Flower: Level 3 Modification Study 012201.

BACKGROUND: The PathogenDx family of assays uses microarray technology to simultaneously detect the presence of bacterial and fungal pathogens in food products, environmental surfaces, and cannabis products. OBJECTIVE: The Detectx Combined assay was validated for the detection of Aspergillus, (Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus fumigatus, Aspergillus niger, and Aspergillus terreus), Salmonella, and a broad range of STEC (stx1 and/or 2) species. The validation consisted of two matrix studies in dried hemp flower and dried cannabis flower (>0.3% delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol) flower, product consistency, stability, robustness, and inclusivity and exclusivity for two targets: Aspergillus and STEC. METHOD: The PathogenDx Detectx Combined assay was evaluated with 30 replicates in each matrix and confirmed according to the instructions outlined in this study. RESULTS: Results of the validation study met the requirements of AOAC Standard Method Performance Requirement (SMPR®) 2020.002 and 2020.012. In the inclusivity and exclusivity study, all target isolates (Aspergillus and STEC) were correctly detected. For the exclusivity study, 26 out of 30 Aspergillus and 30 out of 30 STEC non-target strains were correctly excluded. In the matrix study, the PathogenDx Detectx Combined assay showed no significant statistical differences between confirmed results for dried hemp and cannabis flower. Robustness testing indicated that small changes to the method parameters did not impact the performance of the assay. Stability and consistency studies verified that the assay's shelf-life claims were appropriate, and manufacturing of the assay was consistent. CONCLUSIONS: The validation study indicated that the PathogenDx DetectX Combined assay was successful in detection of the new target analytes (Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus fumigatus, Aspergillus niger, and Aspergillus terreus and STEC containing stx1 and/or 2) and could successfully recover these organisms and Salmonella from dried hemp flower and dried cannabis flower (>0.3% delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol). HIGHLIGHTS: The PathogenDx DetectX Combined Assay will be the first PTM approved multiplex assay for Aspergillus, E. coli and Salmonella that does not require an enrichment step.

Evaluation of the Thermo Scientific SureTectTM Listeria Species PCR Assay in a Broad Range of Foods and Selected Environmental Surfaces: Pre-Collaborative and Collaborative Study, First Action 2021.06.

BACKGROUND: The Thermo Scientific SureTect™ Listeria species PCR assay utilizes SolarisTM reagents for performing PCR for the rapid and specific detection of Listeria species in a broad range of foods and selected environmental surfaces. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate reproducibility of the Thermo Scientific SureTect Listeria species PCR assay in a collaborative study using a challenging matrix, full-fat cottage cheese (25 g), to extend the scope of the method. METHODS: In the collaborative study, the candidate method was compared to the US Food and Drug Administration/Bacteriological Analytical Manual (FDA/BAM) Ch. 10 Listeria reference method. The candidate method used two PCR thermocyclers, the Applied Biosystems QuantStudio™ 5 Real-Time PCR instrument (QS5) and the Applied Biosystems 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR instrument (7500 Fast). The candidate method included its own confirmation procedure. Eighteen participants from 10 laboratories located within the United States and Europe were solicited for the collaborative study, with 12 participants submitting valid data. Statistical analysis was conducted according to the probability of detection (POD) statistical model. In addition, in order to extend the scope of the method, seven matrix studies were performed comparing the candidate method to the FDA/BAM reference method. One of these matrixes was also compared to the ISO 11290-1:2017 Microbiology of the food chain-Horizontal method for the detection and enumeration of Listeria monocytogenes and of Listeria spp.-Part 1: Detection method reference method. RESULTS: In the collaborative study, the difference in laboratory results indicates equivalence between the candidate method and reference method for the matrix evaluated and the method demonstrated acceptable inter-laboratory reproducibility as determined in the collaborative evaluation. The two PCR instruments used in the study performed equivalently. All presumptive positives were confirmed via the alternative confirmation procedure. In the pre-collaborative studies, the results showed comparable performances between the candidate method and the reference method for all matrixes tested. CONCLUSION: Based on the data generated, the method demonstrated acceptable inter-laboratory reproducibility data and statistical analysis. HIGHLIGHTS: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, some participants had to be trained remotely. Additionally, 25 g full-fat cottage cheese is known to be a challenging matrix to test. No unusual cross-contamination, or false-positive/negative data was reported, highlighting the ease of use, reproducibility, and robustness of the candidate method.

Validation of the Modified Clear Safety Salmonella for Detection of Salmonella enterica in Selected Poultry and Pet Food Matrixes and on Stainless Steel: AOAC Performance Tested MethodSM 111802.

BACKGROUND: The Clear Safety Salmonella method was modified to improve sample preparation, PCR reagents, library preparation, flow cell quality control, library loading mix, priming mix, and sequencing kit reagents and steps. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the modified Clear Safety Salmonella method (manual and automated) via independent and method developer validation studies according to current AOAC INTERNATIONAL Validation Guidelines. METHOD: Performance of the modified Clear Safety Salmonella method (manual and automated) was assessed for selectivity (using 105 inclusive and 30 exclusive strains), probability of detection in matrixes, product consistency, stability, and robustness. The modified Clear Safety Salmonella method was compared with the appropriate reference method for Salmonella detection on 4 inch × 4 inch stainless steel environmental surfaces, and in chicken carcass rinse (30 mL), raw ground chicken (375 g), dry pet food (375 g), and ready-to-eat deli turkey breast (375 g). RESULTS: The modified Clear Safety Salmonella method (manual and automated) demonstrated no statistically significant differences between the candidate and reference method probability of detection or between the presumptive and confirmed results for all target food matrixes and the stainless steel surface. Additionally, the modified method (manual and automated) detected all 105 inclusivity organisms and excluded all 30 exclusivity organisms. The product consistency and kit stability studies showed no statistical differences between lots or over the term of the kit's shelf life. In robustness studies, changes in enrichment time, diluted sample volume, and sample volume for PCR did not show any statistical difference in terms of assay performance. CONCLUSIONS: The modified Clear Safety Salmonella method (both manual and automated) is statistically equivalent to or better than the reference methods. HIGHLIGHTS: The Clear Safety Salmonella method utilizes PCR amplification and targeted next-generation sequencing technology to selectively detect Salmonella enterica.

Evaluation of the Thermo Scientific SureTect Salmonella Species PCR Assay in a Broad Range of Foods and Select Environmental Surfaces: Pre-Collaborative and Collaborative Study: First Action 2021.02.

BACKGROUND: The Thermo Scientific™ SureTect™ Salmonella species PCR Assay utilizes Solaris™ reagents for performing PCR for the rapid and specific detection of Salmonella species in a broad range of foods and select environmental surfaces. OBJECTIVE: The aims were to demonstrate the reproducibility of the Thermo Scientific SureTect Salmonella species PCR Assay in a collaborative study using a challenging matrix, cocoa powder, and to extend the scope of the method. METHOD: In the collaborative study, the candidate method was compared to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Bacteriological Analytical Manual (BAM) Chapter 5 Salmonella reference method. The candidate method used two PCR thermocyclers, the Applied Biosystems™ QuantStudio™ 5 Real-Time PCR instrument (QS5) and the Applied Biosystems 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR instrument (7500 Fast). Fourteen participants from nine laboratories located within the United States and Europe were solicited for the collaborative study, with 12 participants submitting valid data. Three levels of contamination were evaluated for each matrix. Statistical analysis was conducted according to the probability of detection statistical model. In addition, 11 matrix studies were performed comparing the candidate method to the FDA/BAM Chapter 5 or US Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service, Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook 4.10 Isolation and Identification of Salmonella from Meat, Poultry, Pasteurized Egg, and Siluriformes (Fish) Products and Carcass and Environmental Sponges reference method. Nine of these matrices were also compared to the EN ISO 6579-1:2017/Amd.1:2020(E) Microbiology of the food chain-Horizontal method for the detection, enumeration and serotyping of Salmonella-Part 1: Detection of Salmonella spp.-AMENDMENT 1: Broader range of incubation temperatures, amendment to the status of Annex D, and correction of the composition of MSRV and SC reference method. RESULTS: In the collaborative study, the difference in laboratory results indicates equivalence between the candidate method and reference method for the matrix evaluated, and the method demonstrated acceptable interlaboratory reproducibility as determined in the collaborative evaluation. False-positive and false-negative rates were determined for the matrix and produced values of <2%. The two PCR thermocyclers (QS5, 7500 Fast) performed equivalently. There were no result differences between candidate method confirmations and reference method confirmations. In the pre-collaborative matrix extension, the results from the matrix studies showed a comparable performance between the candidate method and the tested reference methods. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the data generated, the method demonstrated acceptable interlaboratory reproducibility data and statistical analysis. HIGHLIGHTS: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, some participants had to be trained remotely. Additionally, 375 g cocoa powder is known to be a challenging matrix for PCR methods. No unusual cross-contamination or false-positive/negative was reported, highlighting the ease of use, reproducibility, and robustness of the method.

Validation of the Thermo Scientific SureTect™ Escherichia coli O157:H7 and STEC Screening PCR Assay and SureTect™ Escherichia coli STEC Identification PCR Assay for the Detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and the Escherichia coli STEC Serotypes (O26, O45, O103, O111, O121, O145) from Fresh Raw Spinach, Fresh Baby Leaves, Fresh Cut Tomatoes, Frozen Raw Beef, Raw Beef Trim, and Beef Carcass Sponges: AOAC Performance Tested MethodSM 012102.

BACKGROUND: The Thermo Scientific SureTect™ Escherichia coli O157:H7 and STEC Screening PCR Assay and SureTect Escherichia coli STEC Identification PCR Assay are real-time PCR kits for the rapid detection of E. coli O157:H7 and non-E. coli O157 Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC) serotypes (O26, O45, O103, O111, O121, O145) from fresh raw spinach, fresh baby leaves, fresh cut tomatoes, frozen raw beef, raw beef trim, and beef carcass sponges. OBJECTIVE: Both assays were evaluated for AOAC®Performance Tested MethodsSM certification. METHODS: Detection and confirmation inclusivity/exclusivity, matrix, product consistency and stability, and robustness studies were conducted. In the matrix studies, the candidate method was validated against United States and international reference methods for STEC serotypes. RESULTS: Matrix studies showed no statistically significant differences between the candidate and reference method results when analyzed by probability of detection. For each inclusivity/exclusivity study, all inclusivity strains and no exclusivity strains were detected by either kit. Robustness testing demonstrated that the identification assay performed reliably despite method deviations; however, although not statistically significant, the screening assay performance was impacted. Product consistency and stability testing demonstrated no statistically significant differences between kit lots and storage time points. CONCLUSION: The data presented show that both assays constitute a rapid and reliable workflow for the detection and confirmation of E. coli O157:H7 and stipulated non-E. coli O157:H7 STEC serotypes from the tested matrixes. HIGHLIGHTS: Results are obtained in 80 min post-enrichment with both assays run simultaneously, allowing for the detection and confirmation of STEC within a single workflow.

Validation of the Thermo Scientific™ SureTect™Staphylococcus aureus PCR Assay for the Detection of Staphylococcus aureus in Dairy Matrixes: AOAC Performance Tested MethodSM 052101.

BACKGROUND: The Thermo Scientific™ SureTect™Staphylococcus aureus PCR Assay is a real-time PCR assay for the detection of Staphylococcus aureus in dairy samples. OBJECTIVE: The Thermo Scientific SureTect Staphylococcus aureus PCR Assay was evaluated for AOAC Performance Tested MethodSM certification. METHODS: Inclusivity/exclusivity, matrix studies, product consistency and stability, and robustness testing were conducted to assess the method's performance. For the matrix study, the method was validated on the Applied Biosystems™ QuantStudio™ 5 Real-Time PCR instrument and the Applied Biosystems 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR instrument against the ISO 6888-3:2003 Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs-Horizontal method for the enumeration of coagulase-positive staphylococci (Staphylococcus aureus and other species)-Part 3: Detection and MPN technique for low numbers, and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Bacteriological Analytical Manual (BAM) Ch. 12, Staphylococcus aureus, 2016, reference methods. RESULTS: Matrix studies showed no statistically significant differences between the candidate and reference methods or between presumptive and confirmed results. The inclusivity/exclusivity study correctly identified/excluded all strains analyzed. Robustness testing showed no statistically significant difference in assay performance after set method parameter deviations, and product consistency and stability studies demonstrated no statistically significant differences in performance between kit lots at different expiration points. CONCLUSION: The data presented show that the assay is a rapid and reliable workflow for the detection of S. aureus from dairy matrixes. HIGHLIGHTS: The PCR assay allows for fast, reliable detection of S. aureus in dairy matrixes with results obtained in as little as 80 min post enrichment.

Validation of the Thermo Scientific SureTect™ Campylobacter jejuni, C. coli, and C. lari PCR Kit for the Detection of Campylobacter jejuni, C. coli, and C. lari in Raw Poultry and Ready-to-Cook Poultry Products: AOAC Performance Tested MethodSM 012101.

BACKGROUND: The Thermo Scientific SureTect™ Campylobacter jejuni, C. coli, and C. lari PCR Kit is a real-time PCR assay for the detection and differentiation of C. jejuni, C. coli, and C. lari from raw poultry, ready-to-cook poultry products, and environmental samples. OBJECTIVE: The Thermo Scientific SureTect Campylobacter jejuni, C. coli, and C. lari PCR Kit was evaluated for AOAC®Performance Tested MethodsSM certification. METHODS: Inclusivity/exclusivity, matrix studies, product consistency and stability, and robustness testing were conducted to assess the method's performance. In the matrix studies, the method was validated against United States and international reference methods for Campylobacter detection. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences found in the matrix studies between the candidate and reference methods when analyzed by probability of detection. All 52 inclusivity strains and none of the 51 exclusivity strains tested were detected by the assay. Robustness testing demonstrated that the assay gave reliable performance with specific method deviations outside of the recommended parameters, and the real-time stability testing demonstrated that there were no statistically significant differences between kit lots, validating the stated shelf life of the kit. CONCLUSION: The data presented support the product claims that the Thermo Scientific SureTect Campylobacter jejuni, C. coli, and C. lari PCR assay is suitable for the detection and differentiation of C. jejuni, C. coli, and C. lari from raw poultry, ready-to-cook poultry products, and environmental samples. HIGHLIGHTS: Presumptive results can be obtained in as little as 23 h. Microaerophilic incubators are not required for enrichment.