Photodynamic therapy augments the efficacy of oncolytic vaccinia virus against primary and metastatic tumours in mice.

BACKGROUND: Therapies targeted towards the tumour vasculature can be exploited for the purpose of improving the systemic delivery of oncolytic viruses to tumours. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a clinically approved treatment for cancer that is known to induce potent effects on tumour vasculature. In this study, we examined the activity of PDT in combination with oncolytic vaccinia virus (OVV) against primary and metastatic tumours in mice. METHODS: The effect of 2-[1-hexyloxyethyl-]-2-devinyl pyropheophorbide-a (HPPH)-sensitised-PDT on the efficacy of oncolytic virotherapy was investigated against subcutaneously implanted syngeneic murine NXS2 neuroblastoma and human FaDu head and neck squamous cell carcinoma xenografts in nude mice. Treatment efficacy was evaluated by monitoring tumour growth and survival. The effects of combination treatment on vascular function were examined using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and immunohistochemistry, whereas viral replication in tumour cells was analysed by a standard plaque assay. Normal tissue phototoxicity following PDT-OV treatment was studied using the mouse foot response assay. RESULTS: Combination of PDT with OVV resulted in inhibition of primary and metastatic tumour growth compared with either monotherapy. PDT-induced vascular disruption resulted in higher intratumoural viral titres compared with the untreated tumours. Five days after delivery of OVV, there was a loss of blood flow to the interior of tumour that was associated with infiltration of neutrophils. Administration of OVV did not result in any additional photodynamic damage to normal mouse foot tissue. CONCLUSION: These results provide evidence into the usefulness of PDT as a means of enhancing intratumoural replication and therapeutic efficacy of OV.

The assessment of residual kidney function after living donor nephrectomy.

BACKGROUND: The number of patients on the waiting list for kidney transplantation is increasing as a result of the cadaveric donor shortage. One way to expand the pool is living donor transplantation. However, only 2% of kidney transplants in Poland come from living-related donors. AIM: We sought to assess residual renal function, incidence of hypertension, and proteinuria among living kidney donors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2004 and 2007, we performed 46 living donor open nephrectomies. The mean age of the kidney donor was 39 years (range, 25-57). The donors were predominantly females (61%). Mean hospitalization time was 8 days (range, 4-22). Nine donors did not report for follow-up visits. The observation periods ranged from 1 to 24 months. Physical examination, blood and urine tests, as well as ultrasound scans were performed before nephrectomy and at every follow-up visit (1, 3, 12, and 24 months post operatively). RESULTS: Mean creatinine concentration was higher at 3 months after nephrectomy than preoperatively (P < .05). Mean creatinine clearance according to Cockroft-Gault formula and mean creatinine clearance according to abbreviated modification of diet in renal disease equation (aMDRD) decreased after donation by 30% (P < .05). No cases of proteinuria were observed. Hypertension occurred in 1 donor (2.7%). CONCLUSION: Living kidney donation resulted in a reduced creatinine clearance in the donor. Follow-up of living kidney donors is essential to determine risk factors for deterioration of residual kidney function.

Urologic Complications After Transplantation of Kidneys With Duplicated Ureter: A Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Duplication of ureters is a common anatomic abnormality and occurs in 0.7% to 1% of the general population. In this article we focus on the safety of using of kidneys with complete ureteral duplication, provided no hydronephrosis or ureterocele was present in the donor. METHODS: From 1998 to March 2018 there were 1965 kidneys transplanted at our institution, including 27 kidneys with duplicated ureter, which corresponds to incidence of 1.4%. Patients' medical records, surgery protocols, and Poltransplant registries were searched for urinary complications. RESULTS: In the double ureter group, urologic complications occurred in 4 patients (15.4%). Similarly, severe urinary complications developed in 4 patients from the control group (17.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Transplantation of kidneys with duplicated ureters appears to be a safe and feasible procedure.

Efficacy of Follow-up Care System of Living Kidney Donors in Monitoring of Residual Kidney Function.

BACKGROUND: The possibility of an increased risk of end-stage renal disease is a major concern associated with living kidney donation. Therefore, monitoring of residual kidney function becomes most essential. METHODS: A data analysis of 156 living kidney donors (LKDs) was conducted. The efficacy of the long-term care system with regard to monitoring residual kidney function was evaluated. RESULTS: The analyzed group consisted of 102 (65.4%) women. The mean follow-up period was 5.44 years. The rise in value of mean serum creatinine concentration after donation was observed, but it was within the range of normal during the observation period. Despite its initial decline after nephrectomy, mean glomerular filtration rate (GFR) remained >60 mL/min/1.73 m2. A MDRD (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease) GFR in the range of 45-60 mL/min/1.73 m2 was observed in 53 donors (33.97%). It was found to be <45.0 mL/min/1.73 m2 in 15 cases (9.6%). No patient developed end-stage renal disease. Only 25.0% of those analyzed had their CKD-EPI (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration) GFR estimated on 45-60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and 4.49% were found to have levels of <45 mL/min/1.73 m2 (down to 33.7 mL/min/1.73 m2). Mean postdonation CKD-EPI GFR was estimated at 69.99% of its predonation value. CONCLUSION: A reliable qualification process could minimize the probability of kidney donation by someone with an increased risk of chronic kidney failure. The CKD-EPI formula seems to be more precise than the MDRD for estimatation of LKDs' GFR, as their loss of GFR is a result of nephrectomy and not kidney or systemic disease. Using the MDRD formula may lead to inappropriate diagnosis of CKD in some cases.

Role of Transforming Growth Factor-ß in Hypertensive Living Kidney Donors.

BACKGROUND: Transforming growth factor-ß (TGF-ß) is involved in the pathogenesis of hypertension and the development of hypertensive target organ damage. TGF-ß may promote blood pressure elevation through several mechanisms. The identification of risk factors of hypertension in living kidney donors may provide proper postoperative management. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to determine the serum TGF-ß concentration in living kidney donors after nephrectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 66 living donor open nephrectomies were performed in the Department of General and Transplantation Surgery at the Medical University of Warsaw between 1995 and 2005. Forty living kidney donors reported for the follow-up. Physical examination, blood and urine tests, ECG, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, cardiac sonography, and ophthalmoscopy were performed. Serum TGF-ß concentration was measured by ELISA. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 13.0. RESULTS: The mean observation period was 65.6 months. The mean donor age at the time of donation and at the follow-up visit was 40.7 and 46.2, respectively. Hypertension was observed in 24% women and in 37% men after surgery. The significantly higher frequency of hypertension was observed after nephrectomy (P = .001). The strongest predictor of hypertension was age. The mean serum TGF-ß concentration was 39.3 ng/mL. No significant differences were observed between hypertensive and normotensive donors (P = .061). A significantly higher TGF-ß concentration was found 4 and 5 years after donation (P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: TGF-ß is not associated with hypertension and glomerular filtration rate in living kidney donors after nephrectomy. Careful monitoring of hypertension in living kidney donors after nephrectomy is essential.

Does Low Birthweight Have an Impact on Living Kidney Donor Outcomes?

INTRODUCTION: Because nearly 30,000 people worldwide become living kidney donors each year, donor safety is of the utmost importance. Recent studies have shown that living kidney donation is associated with an increased relative risk for end-stage renal disease (ESRD). It is essential to determine which donors will be more likely to develop ESRD. One of the risk factors for ESRD in living kidney donors is hypertension and, because there are studies demonstrating that low birthweight is a risk factor for developing hypertension in adult life, we hypothesized that donors with low birthweight may be at higher risk of developing renal disease after donation. METHODS: Seventy-three living kidney donors were examined. Donors were divided into 2 cohorts: a group with low birthweight and group with normal birthweight. We checked whether the donor birthweight has an impact on the outcome of donor renal function and on the development of hypertension. RESULTS: Hypertension was observed statistically more frequent in the group with low birthweight (P = .003). CONCLUSION: Glomerular filtration rate before kidney donation was found to be lower in the low-birthweight group.

Psychological Aspects of Living Kidney Donation in Poland: Experience of One Center.

BACKGROUND: Living kidney transplantation is the optimal treatment of end-stage renal disease. The benefits for recipients are obvious. The psychological consequences for living kidney donors in Poland are not known. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate the psychological aspects of living kidney donation in Poland. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 66 living donor open nephrectomies were performed in our institution between 1995 and 2005. The psychological aspects were assessed in 40 donors after nephrectomy. The study applied the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS), the Situation Assessment Questionnaire, the Health Behaviors Survey, and our own questionnaire. The mean observation period was 65.6 months. RESULTS: There was a trend toward better life satisfaction in living kidney donors compared to Polish adults. Donor life satisfaction was significantly lower when the recipient was dead than when the recipient was alive. Most donors perceived the kidney donation as a challenge in cognitive judgment. The mean score of the Health Behaviors Survey was not significantly different than in the general population in Poland. The mean pain score after donation was 3.2 in a 5-item scale (1 = severe pain, 5 = mild pain). The mean time of return to work was 3.5 months. No donors regretted their decisions about kidney donation. CONCLUSION: Living kidney donation in Poland has a positive impact on donors' quality of life. Among living kidney donors, the sense of danger concerning the risk of donation depends on the degree of the relationship with the recipient.

Do Anatomical Anomalies Affect the Results of Living Donor Kidney Transplantation?

BACKGROUND: Multiple renal artery kidneys still represent a special challenge for surgeons, during both nephrectomy for organ donation and transplantation. Recognition of anatomical conditions with advanced imaging methods is one of the most important elements of the preoperative evaluation process. AIM: The purpose of the current study was to assess if anatomical abnormalities affect the outcomes of living kidney donor transplantation procedures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 60 living kidney donors and their recipients was performed. Patients were assigned to two groups: pairs with a single allograft vessels (group I) and pairs with any anatomical abnormalities of the transplanted organ (group II). The impact of anatomical abnormalities on initial and long-term outcomes of the transplantation were analyzed. RESULTS: The analyzed study group consisted of 60 pairs (35 included in group I and 25 in group II). Immediate graft function was observed in 65.7% vs 64% individuals, recpectively (n.s.). Mean serum creatinine concentration was 1.6, 1.46, and 1.44 mg/mL (group I) vs 1.78, 1.78, and 1.65 mg/mL (group II) at 1, 6, and 12 months posttransplant, respectively (n.s.). Glomerular filtration rate (using the Chronic Kindey Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation) was estimated at 54.3, 59.9, and 61.0 mL/min/1.73 m2 (group I) vs 59.8, 57.6, and 59.8 mL/min/1.73 m2 (group II) at the same time points, respectively (n.s.). CONCLUSIONS: Presence of single renal vessels was not a predictor of immediate graft function in living-donor kidney transplantation. Transplantation outcomes for kidneys with anatomical anomalies did not differ when compared to organs with typical anatomy. Multiple renal arteries did not impact initial graft function if precise surgical technique and proper preoperative diagnostics were provided.

Analysis of Distribution of Expanded- and Standard-Criteria Donors and Complications Among Polish Recipients by Kidney Donor Risk Index Value.

INTRODUCTION: The approach toward transplanting kidneys from expanded-criteria donors (ECDs) in Poland is largely site-dependent. The Kidney Donor Risk Index (KDRI) allows for obtaining a more precise characteristic of ECDs and further stratification into "better" and "worse" quality grafts. METHODS: Comparison of the incidence of delayed graft function (DGF) and biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), median of hospitalization time and median of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 1 year after transplantation among kidney graft recipients (n = 468), divided by donor status (ECD/standard-criteria donor [SCD]) and KDRI value (I: 0.67-1.2, II: 1.21-1.6, III: 1.61-2.0, IV: 2.01-3.48). RESULTS: ECD kidneys have been transplanted to 32.47% of recipients. There were no ECD recipients in KDRI compartment I, 16.55% in compartment II, 79.22% in compartment III, and 100% in IV. In KDRI compartment II, DGF was diagnosed in 34.9% of SCDs and 56% of ECDs (P = .003), BPAR occurred in 7.8% of SCDs and 16% of ECDs (P = .073), median hospital stay was 12 days for SCDs and ECDs (P = 1), and eGFR was 50.7 mL/min for SCDs and 49.4 mL/min for ECDs (P = .734). In KDRI compartment III, DGF was diagnosed in 43.8% of SCDs and 49.2% of ECDs (P = .139), BPAR occurred in 6.3% of SCDs and 31.7% of ECDs (P = .001), median hospital stay was 10 days for SCDs and 12 days for ECDs (P = .634), and eGFR was 49.5 mL/min for SCDs and 45.2 mL/min for ECDs (P = .382). Among ECD recipients, DGF was diagnosed in 56.0%, 49.2%, and 47.7% of patients for KDRI compartments II, III, and IV respectively (P = .776); BPAR occurred in 16% (compartment II), 31.7% (compartment III), and 23.1% (compartment IV) (P = .273); the median hospital stay was 12 days (compartment II), 12 days (compartment III), and 12.5 days (compartment IV) (P = 1); and eGFR was 49.5 mL/min (compartment II), 45.4 mL/min (compartment III), and 36.1 mL/min (compartment IV) (P = .002). CONCLUSION: Assessment using both the ECD and KDRI systems allows for a more precise evaluation of prognosis and predicting complications among recipients.

Renal Tumor in Allogeneic Kidney Transplant Recipient.

BACKGROUND: Malignancies will be a leading cause of mortality in renal transplant recipients in the next 20 years. Renal cell cancer (RCC) is the most common urologic cancer in kidney transplant recipients. The risk of RCC development in kidney transplant recipients is 15-100 times higher than in the general population. The purpose of the current retrospective study was to assess the frequency of nephrectomies performed because of renal tumors in the native kidneys in kidney transplant recipients in the Department of General and Transplantation Surgery at the Medical University of Warsaw between 2010 and 2014 year; the identification of kidney recipients diagnosed with RCC; and epidemiologic, clinical, and histopathological aspects associated with RCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 319 nephrectomies were performed in the Department of General and Transplantation Surgery at the Medical University of Warsaw between 2010 and 2014 year. Renal tumors were diagnosed in 25 renal transplant recipients. RESULTS: Among malignant tumors, 13 cases of RCC and 1 case of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) were observed. There was no significant difference between age and duration of pretransplantation dialysis in patients with RCC and patients with benign tumors (P = .14 and P = .91, respectively). Body mass index was significantly higher in patients with RCC than in patients with benign tumors (P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Renal cell cancer is more common among male kidney recipients. There is a good Polish screening system allowing detection of kidney cancer in native kidney. We recommend performing periodic screening for kidney cancers to obtain an early diagnosis.

Pathologies in Living Kidney Donors Diagnosed in the Long-Term Care System.

Kidney donation should not lead to deterioration of the donor's health condition, both during the perisurgical period and in the long term. Safety of a living kidney donor becomes a prerequisite for his/her qualification. Detailed diagnostic procedures are performed to exclude any abnormalities of his/her health condition. Additionally, a long-term post-donation follow-up system for kidney donors has been set up in Poland besides the restrictive qualification system. Transplantation centers are obligated to provide a diagnostic procedures for living organ donors as a part of the monitoring of their health condition and to ensure them a medical follow-up for 10 years after the donation. A total of 141 cases of unilateral nephroureterectomy performed in 2003-2014 to obtain a kidney for transplantation were considered. Medical files of post-donation diagnostic or therapeutic methods and their outcomes were retrospectively analyzed. The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy of monitoring of donors' health condition within the framework of the long-term follow-up system for kidney donors in the aspect of detection of the donation-independent abnormalities.

Renal Transplantation Using Kidneys Procured From Elderly Donors Older Than 70 Years.

AIM: A major problem for the transplant society is a shortage of organs for transplantation compared with the number of patients on the waiting list. This study aimed to assess the results of the transplantation of kidneys procured from older donors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 27 kidneys procured from donors age 70 years or older were transplanted between January 1, 2010, and April 25, 2015. These represented only 4.1% of the 657 kidneys transplanted from deceased donors during this period at the same center. RESULTS: Delayed graft function (DGF) in the recipients of kidneys procured from donors age 70 or older occurred in 46.1% of patients, whereas the recipients of kidneys from younger donors showed DGF at a frequency of 32.7% (P = NS). The annual and 3-year survival rates of kidneys in the study group were 85% and 80%, respectively, and in the control group were 92.5% and 88.6%, respectively (P = NS). According to the Polish National Organ Procurement Organization (Poltransplant), the annual survival rate of a transplanted kidney in Poland stands at 89%, whereas the 3-year survival rate is 82%. We detected no significant posttransplantation differences in the serum creatinine concentration and in the estimated glomerular filtration rate between the study and control groups. The donor age and donor creatinine were the variables independently associated with DGF. CONCLUSIONS: The results of transplantation of kidneys from elderly donors were comparable to those of transplantation from younger donors. Kidneys harvested from elderly donors should be used for a transplant after a preliminary assessment.

Surgical complications of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation: a 16-year-experience at one center.

Fifty-one simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants (SPKT) were performed between 1988 and 2004 in patients of mean age 34 years and 23 years duration of diabetes treatment. All kidney and pancreas recipients were on maintenance hemodialysis therapy prior to SPKT. The pancreas with duodenal segment and the kidneys were harvested from cadaveric heart-beating donors. Cold ischemia time in UW solution varied from 4 to 14 hours (mean, 9 hours 35 minutes). Twenty patients had the duodenal segment sutured to the urinary bladder, and the remaining 31 grafts were drained to an isolated ileal loop. Quadruple immunosuppression was administered as well as an anticoagulant and antibiotic prophylaxis. Forty-nine patients (49/51, 96%) regained insulin independence in the immediate postoperative period; 44 (86%) displayed immediate graft function. The remaining patients experienced postoperative ATN, the longest duration was 18 days. Of 51 patients, 38 (14.5%) are alive (follow-up, 6 to 180 months), 26 (68.5%) have good pancreatic function, and 34 (89%), good kidney function. Nineteen (50%) patients regard their quality of life as improved compared to their pretransplant status, which is mainly attributed to being dialysis and insulin free. Of 19 patients, 14 (74%) reported measuring glycemia regularly due to fear of losing the pancreas graft. Of 19 persons, seven (37%) returned to work after transplantation. Four (8.3%) lost their kidney graft secondary to vascular complications (n = 2) or rejection (n = 2). Four pancreas grafts with bladder drainage required conversion to enteric drainage owing to persistent urinary infections or urinary fistulae. Fifteen (29%) patients lost their pancreatic grafts within 1 year of transplantation due to the following: vascular complications (n = 12), septic complications (n = 1), or rejection (n = 2). Thirteen patients died within 1 year after transplantation, 5 of septic complications, 5 of neuroinfection, 1 of pulmonary embolism, and 2 of myocardial infarction. In conclusion, SPKT is a successful treatment for diabetic nephropathy, burdened by the possibility of serious complications.

Infectious complications after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation.

Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT) improves long-term survival of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus patients with diabetic nephropathy. The increasing success of SPKT is a result of improved surgical technique, better organ preservation, potent antirejection therapy, and effective use of antibiotics to prevent and treat infectious complications. However, morbidity and mortality following SPKT remain high mainly owing to infection. From 1988 to 2004, the 51 patients who underwent SPKT were 32 women and 19 men of mean age 34 +/- 4 years old with diabetes and end-stage renal disease. The mean duration of diabetes mellitus was 23 +/- 4 years. The incidence of HCV and HBV infections were 19.6% and 13.7%, respectively. Preoperative work-up included identification and elimination prior to surgery of potential sources of infection. All patients prior to SPKTx had been treated by dialysis (26 +/- 20 months). The kidneys were always placed into the left retroperitoneal space first; at the same time the pancreatic grafts were prepared on the back table. The reconstruction of the superior mesenteric and the splenic arteries was performed using a Y graft of donor iliac artery to the common or external donor's iliac artery. The pancreas was transplanted intraperitoneally to the right iliac vessels. The portal vein was sutured to the common or external iliac vein and the arterial conduit of donor iliac artery. In 20 of the patients, bladder drainage and in 31, enteric drainage was used for the pancreatic juice exterioration. Patients received immunosuppression with a calcineurin inhibitor (tacrolimus or cyclosporin), mycophenolic acid or azathioprine, and steroids. Antibody induction (alternatively anti-IL-2 monoclonal antibody or ATG) was used in last 38 patients. Antibacterial (tazobactam) and antifungal (fluconazole) as well as antiviral (gancyclovir) prophylactic treatment was given to all patients for 7 to 10 days after transplantation. Thirty-eight recipients are alive, 26 with function of both grafts; 8 with functioning kidney grafts; and 4 with nonfunctioning grafts on dialysis treatment from 1 to 14 years after transplantation. Thirteen patients (24.5%) died during the first year after transplantation. Infectious complications were the main cause of death. Systemic infections accounted for the death of five patients and CNS infection for death of another five patients. Three patients died with functioning grafts due to cardiopulmonary disorders (myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolus) early in the postoperative period. A total of 102 infections were diagnosed in 51 patients during the posttransplant course. Twenty-one episodes of CMV infection (systemic 20, duodenal site 1), 73 bacterial infections (systemic 13, pulmonary 13, urinary tract 15, intestinal 8, wound 23), and 8 fungal infections (central nervous system 5, gastrointestinal tract 3). Some patients had more than one type of infection. Overall mortality in the investigated group was 24.5%. Infectious complications were the main cause of death (77%), including systemic infection (38.5%) and CNS infection (38.5%). The predominant etiology of the systemic infections was bacterial. The etiology of CNS infections was fungal. In conclusion, infectious complications are the main cause of morbidity and mortality following SPKT. The early diagnosis of infection, particularly fungal complications, is necessary. The administration of broad-spectrum prophylactic antibiotics, antifungal, and antiviral agents is recommended.

Quality of life after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation.

Even recipients with satisfactory function of transplanted pancreas and kidney may show physical and/or social disability due to diabetic complications. Our aims were to evaluate diabetic complications influencing recipient quality of life and to assess patients' psychosociological status. Nineteen patients with functioning grafts who consented to take part in the study, underwent clinical evaluation and answered questions regarding their quality of life. Results showed excellent endocrine pancreatic function in 17 patients. In most recipients, insulin activity and C-peptide levels were elevated owing to systemic venous drainage. Opthalmological examination revealed blindness in 7 patients (in 4 cases with onset following SPKTx) and retinopathy in 13 patients (in 5 cases it appeared after SPKTx). Assessment of the cardiovascular system revealed satisfactory cardiac function in 16 of 19 patients; 4 patients underwent amputation of a lower limb following SPKTx. All 19 recipients admitted to a great benefit of transplantation; most patients declared ability to organize their life activity and social functions and 4 had regular employment. Conversely, most patients were afraid of graft loss, and half were often sad and even depressed.

Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation: analysis of donor factors.

There are no urgent indications for simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation. So our policy is to harvest only a pancreas in good biologic condition. The criteria for acceptance of a pancreas donor are: age 15 to 40 years, ICU stay < 7 days, no clinical signs of infection, negative virologic status, no history of hypotension or cardiac arrest, serum amylase elevation below three times normal values, controllable hyperglycemia, no history of pancreatic disease, no history of abdominal trauma damaging the organ, no history of alcohol addiction, BMI < 25, no functional or anatomical lesions of the kidneys, and expected ischemia time less than 12 hours. The proper selection of a pancreas donor allows one to achieve good insulin secretion immediately after transplantation. In 2000 to 2002 all 20 pancreases transplanted at transplant center displayed immediate secretory function after transplantation.

Profiles of all 550 procurements and transplantations of kidneys from living donors in Poland, 1967-2012.

INTRODUCTION: Nationwide live organ donor registry is mandatory to ensure the quality and safety of kidney procurement from living donors and for donor protection. In Poland, this concept is achieved with the use of an Internet tool (www.rejestry.net); donation centers are obligated to collect donors' data (demographic characteristics, including pre-, peri-, and post-donation and long-term follow-up). The registry currently handles data from 2008 but is incomplete in the collection of historical procurements. The goal of the research was to collect in one database all information regarding cases of kidney procurements and transplantations from living donors in Poland starting from the first such transplant in 1967. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were gathered from several existing but incomplete records stored by transplant centers. RESULTS: A total of 550 kidney procurements and transplantations from living donors were made in the years 1967 to 2012. We collected 100% of information on the date and donation centers and 100% of information regarding the recipients but only 65% of information regarding the donor and 80% regarding donor-recipient relations. According to the data, women accounted for 60% of living donors and men for 40% of living donors. The mean age of a donor was 45 years, and the mean age of a recipient was 28 years. Among related donors, parents constituted the majority (59%), siblings accounted for 21%, and spouses accounted for 12%. CONCLUSIONS: Although the collected data are incomplete, our research provided the Polish live-donor registry a solid starting point (eg, all dates, center procurements, records of transplantations) to enter remaining data and to build a serviceable tool for full assessment of all live-donor kidney donations in the country.

Glomerular filtration rate estimation in prospective living kidney donors: preliminary study.

INTRODUCTION: Kidney transplantation prolongs life expectancy in end-stage renal disease patients at a lesser cost than dialysis. Estimation of kidney function is crucial in the evaluation of prospective living kidney donors. Although unsurpassed in their precision methods of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) measurement with exogenous substances are invasive, expensive, and carry a risk for anaphylactic reactions. Alternatively, kidney function can also be assessed by GFR estimation formulas based on serum creatinine or novel markers such as cystatin C or ß-trace protein (BTP). The aim of this study was to compare the performance of GFR estimation methods with reference scintigraphy-measured GFR in population of living kidney donor candidates. METHODS: We included 25 prospective kidney donors (aged 28-64 years) and measured GFR with the following equations: Cockcroft-Gault, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD), Mayo Clinic, Nankivell, Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI; including cystatin C), and BTP based. GFR were assessed by (99)mTc-DTPA for reference. All estimation methods were compared with a reference by general linear models. RESULTS: The precision of GFR estimation by all methods is unsatisfactory (30% margin of reference held in <50% of cases). Direction of regression coefficients is negative for some of the methods even when adjusted for body mass index (BMI). Of the study subjects, 64% were overweight/obese. BMI value is significantly correlated with measured GFR (P < .01). CKD-EPI estimation equations are the most precise methods of GFR estimation in this analysis; in addition, CKD-EPI cystatin C and combined creatinine/cystatin C estimators are robust to overweight/obesity. CONCLUSIONS: The precision of GFR estimation is unsatisfactory, in part because of overweight, which adversely influences measured GFR, but also renders estimation methods unusable, except for CKD-EPI cystatin C and combined creatinine/cystatin C formulae. GFR measurement with exogenous substances remains the method of choice in the assessment of kidney function in prospective kidney donors. In addition, it provides useful information on differential (split) renal function.

Impact of pretransplant body mass index on early kidney graft function.

BACKGROUND: An increase in the number of obese patients on transplantation waiting lists can be observed. There are conflicting results regarding the influence of body mass index (BMI) on graft function. METHODS: We performed a single-center, retrospective study of 859 adult patients who received a renal graft from deceased donors. BMI (kg/m(2)) was calculated from patients' height and weight at the time of transplantation. Kidney recipients were subgrouped into 4 groups, according to their BMI: Groups A (<18.5; n = 57), B (18.6-24.9; n = 565), C (25-29.9; n = 198) and D (>30; n = 39). Primary or delayed graft function (DGF), acute rejection (AR) episodes, and number of reoperations, graft function expressed by glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and serum creatinine concentration and number of graft loss as well as the recipient's death were analyzed. The follow-up period was 1 year. RESULTS: Obese patients' grafts do not develop any function more frequently in comparison with their nonobese counterparts (P < .0001; odds ratio [OR], 32.364; 95% CI, 2.174-941.422). Other aspects of the procedure were analyzed to confirm that thesis: Cold ischemia time and number of HLA mismatches affect the frequency of AR (OR, 1.0182 [P = .0029] and OR, 1.1496 [P = .0147], respectively); moreover, donor median creatinine serum concentration (P = .00004) and cold ischemia time (P = .00019) are related to delayed graft function. BMI did not influence the incidence of DGF (P = .08, OR; 1.167; 95% CI, 0.562-2.409), the number of AR episodes (P > .1; OR, 1.745; 95% CI, 0.846-3.575), number of reoperations, GFR (P = .22-.92), or creatinine concentration (P = .09). Number of graft losses (P = .12; OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 0.770-4.184) or patient deaths (P = .216; OR, 3.69; 95% CI, 0.153-36.444) were not influenced. CONCLUSION: Greater recipient BMI at the time of transplantation has a significant influence on the incidence of primary graft failure.

Characteristics of potential living kidney donors and recipients: donor disqualification reasons--experience of a Polish center.

INTRODUCTION: Kidney transplantation is efficacious as a renal replacement, particularly pre-emptive living donation. In Poland, the rate of transplantation of living donor kidneys is only 3%. The aim of the study was to identify the most common reasons to disqualify a potential living kidney donor. METHODS: We evaluated 124 kidney donor candidates for 111 potential recipients at 1 medical center for genders and ages of donor and recipient; thus relation, donor disqualification reasons, number of potential donors for a particular recipient, prior transplantations, and kidney vasculature. RESULTS: The 111 recipients of ages 2-62 years had, 1, 2, or 3 potential donors were tested in 101, 1, and 7, cases respectively. We had 18.9% recipients referred for pre-emptive transplantation; 59.5% were on haemodialysis and 21.6% on peritoneal dialysis. In all, 89% recipients sought first kidney transplantations. Kidneys were procured from 49/124 (39.5%) of the initially evaluated donors. The full examination was completed by 92 potential donors with 68/124 donors disqualified early. Single and multiple renal arteries were detected in 56 and 36 potential donors, respectively. Donor disqualification was due to medical contraindications (39.7%), earlier transplantation from a deceased donor (25%), immunologic constraints (23.5%), donor consent withdrawn (6%) or psychological and social reasons (4.4%). CONCLUSIONS: A considerable number of donor candidates are disqualified for medical reasons.