RESUMEN
AIM: To report on the multidisciplinary approach, focusing specifically on the role of the interventional radiologist (IR), used to support the Biomarker-integrated Approaches of Targeted Therapy for Lung Cancer Elimination (BATTLE) and BATTLE-2 trials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent percutaneous image-guided biopsy for the BATTLE and BATTLE-2 trials were reviewed. A radiology-based, three-point, lesion-scoring system was developed and used by two IRs. Lesions were given a score of 3 (most likely to yield sufficient material for biomarker analysis) if they met the following criteria: size >2 cm, solid mass, demonstrated imaging evidence of viability, and were technically easy to sample. Lesions not meeting all four criteria were scored 2 with the missing criteria noted as negative factors. Lesions considered to have risks that outweighed potential benefits receive a score of 1 and were not biopsied. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the score's ability to predict successful yield for biomarker adequacy. RESULTS: A total of 555 biopsies were performed. The overall yield for analysis of the required biomarkers was 86.1% (478/555), and 84% (268/319) and 88.9% (210/236) for BATTLE and BATTLE-2, respectively (p=0.09). Lesions receiving a score of 3 were adequate for biomarker analysis in 89% of cases. Lesions receiving a score of 2 with more than two negative factors were adequate for molecular analysis in 69.2% (IR1, p=0.03) and 74% (IR2, p=0.04) of cases. The two IRs scored 78.4% of the lesions the same indicating moderate agreement (kappa=0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.48, 0.61). CONCLUSIONS: IRs add value to clinical trial teams by optimising lesions selected for biopsy and biomarker analysis.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Radiología Intervencionista/métodos , Anciano , Biopsia con Aguja Fina , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Femenino , Humanos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Pulmón/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Grupo de Atención al PacienteRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The survival advantage of induction chemotherapy (IC) followed by locoregional treatment is controversial in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LAHNSCC). We previously showed feasibility and safety of cetuximab-based IC (paclitaxel/carboplatin/cetuximab-PCC, and docetaxel/cisplatin/5-fluorouracil/cetuximab-C-TPF) followed by local therapy in LAHNSCC. The primary end point of this phase II clinical trial with randomization to PCC and C-TPF followed by combined local therapy in patients with LAHNSCC stratified by human papillomavirus (HPV) status and T-stage was 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) compared with historical control. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients were ≥18 years with squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx, oral cavity, nasopharynx, hypopharynx, or larynx with measurable stage IV (T0-4N2b-2c/3M0) and known HPV by p16 status. Stratification was by HPV and T-stage into one of the two risk groups: (i) low-risk: HPV-positive and T0-3 or HPV-negative and T0-2; (ii) intermediate/high-risk: HPV-positive and T4 or HPV-negative and T3-4. Patient reported outcomes were carried out. RESULTS: A total of 136 patients were randomized in the study, 68 to each arm. With a median follow up of 3.2 years, the 2-year PFS in the PCC arm was 89% in the overall, 96% in the low-risk and 67% in the intermediate/high-risk groups; in the C-TPF arm 2-year PFS was 88% in the overall, 88% in the low-risk and 89% in the intermediate/high-risk groups. CONCLUSION: The observed 2-year PFS of PCC in the low-risk group and of C-TPF in the intermediate/high-risk group showed a 20% improvement compared with the historical control derived from RTOG-0129, therefore reaching the primary end point of the trial.
Asunto(s)
Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Papillomaviridae/patogenicidad , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeza y Cuello/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Carboplatino/administración & dosificación , Cetuximab/administración & dosificación , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Docetaxel/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Quimioterapia de Inducción/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/virología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Papillomaviridae/efectos de los fármacos , Papillomaviridae/genética , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/patología , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/virología , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeza y Cuello/patología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeza y Cuello/virologíaRESUMEN
Background: Long-term data with immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are limited. Two phase III trials demonstrated improved overall survival (OS) and a favorable safety profile with the anti-programmed death-1 antibody nivolumab versus docetaxel in patients with previously treated advanced squamous (CheckMate 017) and nonsquamous (CheckMate 057) NSCLC. We report results from ≥3 years' follow-up, including subgroup analyses of patients with liver metastases, who historically have poorer prognosis among patients with NSCLC. Patients and methods: Patients were randomized 1 : 1 to nivolumab (3 mg/kg every 2 weeks) or docetaxel (75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks) until progression or discontinuation. The primary end point of each study was OS. Patients with baseline liver metastases were pooled across studies by treatment for subgroup analyses. Results: After 40.3 months' minimum follow-up in CheckMate 017 and 057, nivolumab continued to show an OS benefit versus docetaxel: estimated 3-year OS rates were 17% [95% confidence interval (CI), 14% to 21%] versus 8% (95% CI, 6% to 11%) in the pooled population with squamous or nonsquamous NSCLC. Nivolumab was generally well tolerated, with no new safety concerns identified. Of 854 randomized patients across both studies, 193 had baseline liver metastases. Nivolumab resulted in improved OS compared with docetaxel in patients with liver metastases (hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.50-0.91), consistent with findings from the overall pooled study population (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.61-0.81). Rates of treatment-related hepatic adverse events (primarily grade 1-2 liver enzyme elevations) were slightly higher in nivolumab-treated patients with liver metastases (10%) than in the overall pooled population (6%). Conclusions: After 3 years' minimum follow-up, nivolumab continued to demonstrate an OS benefit versus docetaxel in patients with advanced NSCLC. Similarly, nivolumab demonstrated an OS benefit versus docetaxel in patients with liver metastases, and remained well tolerated. Clinical trial registration: CheckMate 017: NCT01642004; CheckMate 057: NCT01673867.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Docetaxel/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Nivolumab/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/secundario , Docetaxel/efectos adversos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nivolumab/efectos adversos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Enhanced phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway is one of the key adaptive changes accounting for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor-resistant growth in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). We designed a phase II clinical trial of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), erlotinib, in association with the mTOR inhibitor, everolimus, based on the hypothesis that the downstream effects of Akt through inhibition of mTOR may enhance the effectiveness of the EGFR-TKI in patients with recurrent/metastatic HNSCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed platinum-resistant HNSCC received everolimus 5 mg and erlotinib 150 mg daily orally until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, investigator or patient decision. Cytokines and angiogenic factors profile, limited mutation analysis and p16 immunohistochemistry status were included in the biomarker analysis. RESULTS: Of the 35 assessable patients, 3 (8%) achieved partial response at 4 weeks, 1 confirmed at 12 weeks; overall response rate at 12 weeks was 2.8%. Twenty-seven (77%) patients achieved disease stabilization at 4 weeks, 11 (31%) confirmed at 12 weeks. Twelve-week progression-free survival (PFS) was 49%, median PFS 11.9 weeks and median overall survival (OS) 10.25 months. High neutrophil gelatinase lipocalin (P = 0.01) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) (P = 0.04) plasma levels were significantly associated with worse OS. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of erlotinib and everolimus did not show significant benefit in unselected patients with platinum-resistant metastatic HNSCC despite a manageable toxicity profile. Markers of tumor invasion and hypoxia identify a group of patients with particularly poor prognosis. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: NCT00942734.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/tratamiento farmacológico , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos/efectos de los fármacos , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/tratamiento farmacológico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Terapia Recuperativa , Administración Oral , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/secundario , Clorhidrato de Erlotinib/administración & dosificación , Everolimus/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/mortalidad , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/patología , Humanos , Masculino , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/mortalidad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Platino (Metal)/administración & dosificación , Pronóstico , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: KRAS mutations are detected in 25% of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and no targeted therapies are approved for this subset population. Trametinib, a selective allosteric inhibitor of MEK1/MEK2, demonstrated preclinical and clinical activity in KRAS-mutant NSCLC. We report a phase II trial comparing trametinib with docetaxel in patients with advanced KRAS-mutant NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients with histologically confirmed KRAS-mutant NSCLC previously treated with one prior platinum-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned in a ratio of 2 : 1 to trametinib (2 mg orally once daily) or docetaxel (75 mg/m(2) i.v. every 3 weeks). Crossover to the other arm after disease progression was allowed. Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). The study was prematurely terminated after the interim analysis of 92 PFS events, which showed the comparison of trametinib versus docetaxel for PFS crossed the futility boundary. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-nine patients with KRAS-mutant NSCLC were randomized; of which, 86 patients received trametinib and 43 received docetaxel. Median PFS was 12 weeks in the trametinib arm and 11 weeks in the docetaxel arm (hazard ratio [HR] 1.14; 95% CI 0.75-1.75; P = 0.5197). Median overall survival, while the data are immature, was 8 months in the trametinib arm and was not reached in the docetaxel arm (HR 0.97; 95% CI 0.52-1.83; P = 0.934). There were 10 (12%) partial responses (PRs) in the trametinib arm and 5 (12%) PRs in the docetaxel arm (P = 1.0000). The most frequent adverse events (AEs) in ≥20% of trametinib patients were rash, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and fatigue. The most frequent grade 3 treatment-related AEs in the trametinib arm were hypertension, rash, diarrhea, and asthenia. CONCLUSION: Trametinib showed similar PFS and a response rate as docetaxel in patients with previously treated KRAS-mutant-positive NSCLC. CLINICALTRIALSGOV REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01362296.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos Fitogénicos/uso terapéutico , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , MAP Quinasa Quinasa 1/antagonistas & inhibidores , MAP Quinasa Quinasa 2/antagonistas & inhibidores , Mutación , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas p21(ras)/genética , Piridonas/uso terapéutico , Pirimidinonas/uso terapéutico , Taxoides/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Antineoplásicos Fitogénicos/efectos adversos , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/enzimología , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/genética , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Docetaxel , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Neoplasias Pulmonares/enzimología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , MAP Quinasa Quinasa 1/metabolismo , MAP Quinasa Quinasa 2/metabolismo , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos , Piridonas/efectos adversos , Pirimidinonas/efectos adversos , Transducción de Señal/efectos de los fármacos , Taxoides/efectos adversos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We evaluated combined targeting with cetuximab, an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody, and bevacizumab, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) monoclonal antibody, in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The combination was studied in human endothelial cells and head and neck and lung cancer xenograft model systems. Patients with recurrent or metastatic SCCHN were treated with weekly cetuximab and bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg on day 1 given intravenously every 21 days, until disease progression. Analysis of tumor biomarkers and related serum cytokines was performed. RESULTS: Cetuximab plus bevacizumab enhanced growth inhibition both in vitro and in vivo, and resulted in potent reduction in tumor vascularization. In the clinical trial, 46 eligible patients were enrolled. The objective response rate was 16% and the disease control rate 73%. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 2.8 and 7.5 months, respectively. Grade 3-4 adverse events were expected and occurred in less than 10% of patients. transforming growth factor alpha, placenta-derived growth factor, EGFR, VEGFR2 increased and VEGF decreased after treatment but did not correlate with treatment efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: Cetuximab and bevacizumab are supported by preclinical observations and are well tolerated and active in previously treated patients with SCCHN.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/tratamiento farmacológico , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Bevacizumab , Biomarcadores de Tumor , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Cetuximab , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/patología , Humanos , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Combined inhibition of vascular, platelet-derived, and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) pathways may overcome refractoriness to single agents in platinum-pretreated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, multicenter, phase II trial evaluated sunitinib 37.5 mg/day plus erlotinib 150 mg/day versus placebo plus erlotinib continuously in 4-week cycles. Eligible patients had histologically confirmed stage IIIB or IV NSCLC previously treated with one or two chemotherapy regimens, including one platinum-based regimen. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) by an independent central review. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-two patients were randomly assigned, and the median duration of follow-up was 17.7 months. The median PFS was 2.8 versus 2.0 months for the combination versus erlotinib alone (HR 0.898, P = 0.321). The median overall survival (OS) was 8.2 versus 7.6 months (HR 1.066, P = 0.617). Objective response rates (ORRs) were 4.6% and 3.0%, respectively. Sunitinib plus erlotinib was fairly well tolerated although most treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were more frequent than with erlotinib alone: diarrhea (55% versus 33%), rash (41% versus 30%), fatigue (31% versus 25%), decreased appetite (30% versus 13%), nausea (28% versus 14%), and thrombocytopenia (13% versus 0%). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of sunitinib to erlotinib did not significantly improve PFS in patients with advanced, platinum-pretreated NSCLC.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Indoles/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Pirroles/uso terapéutico , Quinazolinas/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/mortalidad , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Método Doble Ciego , Receptores ErbB/antagonistas & inhibidores , Clorhidrato de Erlotinib , Femenino , Humanos , Indoles/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Pirroles/efectos adversos , Quinazolinas/efectos adversos , Receptores del Factor de Crecimiento Derivado de Plaquetas/antagonistas & inhibidores , Receptores de Factores de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/antagonistas & inhibidores , Sunitinib , Sobrevida , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This phase II study estimated the difference in objective response rate (ORR) among patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving paclitaxel-carboplatin (CP) plus motesanib or bevacizumab. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemotherapy-naive patients (N = 186) were randomized 1:1:1 to receive CP plus motesanib 125 mg once daily (qd) (arm A), motesanib 75 mg twice daily (b.i.d.) 5 days on/2 days off (arm B), or bevacizumab 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks (q3w) (arm C). The primary end point was ORR (per RECIST). Other end points included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), motesanib pharmacokinetics, and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: ORRs in the three arms were as follows: arm A, 30% (95% confidence interval 18% to 43%); arm B, 23% (13% to 36%); and arm C, 37% (25% to 50%). Median PFS in arm A was 7.7 months, arm B 5.8 months, and arm C 8.3 months; median OS for arm A was 14.0 months, arm B 12.8 months, and arm C 14.0 months. Incidence of AEs was greater in arms A and B than in arm C. More grade 5 AEs not attributable to disease progression occurred in arm B (n = 10) than in arms A (n = 4) and C (n = 4). Motesanib plasma C(max) and C(min) values were consistent with its pharmacokinetic properties observed in previous studies. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of 125 mg qd motesanib or bevacizumab plus CP was estimated to be comparable. Toxicity was higher but manageable in both motesanib arms. Efficacy and tolerability of motesanib 125 mg qd plus CP in advanced nonsquamous NSCLC are being further investigated in a phase III study.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/farmacocinética , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacocinética , Bevacizumab , Carboplatino/administración & dosificación , Carboplatino/efectos adversos , Carboplatino/farmacocinética , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/sangre , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Esquema de Medicación , Humanos , Indoles/administración & dosificación , Indoles/efectos adversos , Indoles/farmacocinética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/sangre , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Niacinamida/administración & dosificación , Niacinamida/efectos adversos , Niacinamida/análogos & derivados , Niacinamida/farmacocinética , Oligonucleótidos , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Paclitaxel/efectos adversos , Paclitaxel/farmacocinética , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
Forty-six patients with progressive metastatic disease following initial response to tamoxifen therapy were treated with aminoglutethimide. Three patients (6%) achieved complete remission, 15 patients (33%) had partial response, and eight patients (17%) had stable disease. Twenty patients (44%) had progressive disease. The most common side effects were transient skin rash, lethargy, or dizziness. In four patients (7%), treatment was discontinued because of undesirable side effects within the first 2 weeks of the study. These data show that aminoglutethimide is an effective agent following tamoxifen therapy.
Asunto(s)
Aminoglutetimida/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Tamoxifeno/uso terapéutico , Aminoglutetimida/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Evaluación de Medicamentos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades de la Piel/inducido químicamente , Fases del Sueño/efectos de los fármacos , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
The effect of diethylaminoethyl-dextran on colony formation of established and primary human ovarian and breast tumor cells in semisolid suspension cultures was investigated. At the concentration of 250 to 300 micrograms/ml used in the human tumor stem cell assay, diethylaminoethyl-dextran inhibited in vitro growth of 3 of 4 human breast tumor cell lines and of 10 of 19 primary tumors. It did not affect growth in 7 primary tumors and enhanced colony formation in 2 tumors. We suggest that diethylaminoethyl-dextran may interact in the human tumor stem cell assay with other sites additional to sulfuric acid residues of the agar and that these effects may cancel or outweigh its purported beneficial effects.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/metabolismo , DEAE Dextrano/farmacología , Dextranos/farmacología , Neoplasias Ováricas/metabolismo , Células Cultivadas , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , HumanosRESUMEN
The use of normal bone marrow (granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming units) as a point of reference to normalize the in vitro activities of anticancer agents has been investigated. The cytotoxic effects of four substituted anthraquinone derivatives, and of vinblastine on myeloid progenitors of different donors were reproducible up to a cell kill of approximately 60%. Equitoxic in vitro concentrations for normal bone marrows did not correlate with in vivo pharmacokinetic concentrations of these drugs. Breast tumor progenitor cells of 46 specimens were more sensitive than were bone marrow progenitors to the anthraquinone derivatives in 26 to 39% of instances, ratios which are similar to the clinically observed response rates of patients with breast carcinoma to these agents. Tumors were either sensitive or resistant to all four drugs in 68% (10 tumors were more sensitive, and 21 tumors were less sensitive than normal bone marrow); but in 32% of instances there were differences in tumor sensitivity for the four drugs, and the assay could select one to three drugs for which the tumor sensitivity was greater than that of bone marrow. Correlations of in vitro sensitivity and of clinical response to single agent treatments were determined in 21 patients, and the concordance was 71%. The value of the assay in predicting clinical response ranked best for sensitivity determinations within the normalized dose ranges, when testing within three different dose ranges was compared in a group of six patients. The concordance was higher in the small (1 or 2 metastatic sites) than in the large (greater than or equal to 3 metastatic sites) tumors (85 versus 50%), indicating a confounding influence of tumor load on the ability of the assay to predict efficacy of treatment. A rule of thumb is proposed for altering the in vitro sensitivity test results for large tumors that improves the overall concordance to 90%.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/toxicidad , Médula Ósea/fisiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/fisiopatología , Médula Ósea/efectos de los fármacos , Supervivencia Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Células Cultivadas , Células Clonales , Ensayo de Unidades Formadoras de Colonias , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Evaluación Preclínica de Medicamentos/métodos , Femenino , Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/efectos de los fármacos , Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/fisiología , Humanos , CinéticaRESUMEN
Macroscopic and microscopic pathology review was used to assess the degree of tumor reduction after preoperative chemotherapy in 90 patients with inflammatory and locally advanced breast cancer. Fifteen (17%) patients had no evident residual macroscopic tumor on gross pathological examination, and 6 of these 15 had no residual tumor on microscopic review either. There was no significant difference in disease-free and overall survival between the six patients with no microscopic disease and the nine patients with only microscopic residual disease but no residual macroscopic tumor. These 15 patients with major reduction after induction chemotherapy had a longer disease-free survival (DFS) (median not reached at 5 yr) than the other 75 patients with lesser degrees of tumor reduction (DFS = 22 mo; P less than 0.01). Clinical evaluation of response to chemotherapy was a less accurate predictor of outcome than was the pathological assessment of response. Complete clinical responders had a 4-yr DFS of 55%, whereas patients with non macroscopic residual tumor following preoperative chemotherapy, less than one-half of whom had been judged to be a complete clinical responder, had a median DFS of greater than 60 mo and a 4-yr DFS of 75%. Patients whose mastectomy specimen had no macroscopic residual disease had a 93% 5-yr survival compared to patients with a less marked response to therapy who had a 5-yr survival of 30% (P less than 0.01). No pretreatment patient or tumor-related variables correlated with the degree of tumor reduction following preoperative therapy. Achievement of a mastectomy specimen free of residual macroscopic tumor after preoperative chemotherapy is an excellent prognostic factor for a prolonged DFS and survival. This information should be considered in the selection of postoperative systemic therapy.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Mastectomía , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
Six hundred nineteen patients with metastatic breast cancer, treated with a combination of 5-fluorouracil, Adriamycin, and cyclophosphamide, or close variations of this program, with or without immunotherapy were analyzed retrospectively to identify those host, tumor, or treatment characteristics that might be of prognostic importance in predicting response to chemotherapy and survival from onset of the 5-fluorouracil-Adriamycin-cyclophosphamide treatments. Primary tumor characteristics such as size of primary, number of axillary nodes involved, stage at diagnosis, and type of surgery used for primary treatment were not found to be of prognostic significance. Host characteristics such as age, menstrual status, or family history of breast cancer were similarly unrelated to outcome. Non-Caucasian patients had a lower response rate and somewhat shorter survival than did Caucasians. Pretreatment weight loss, poor performance status, and abnormal biochemical and hematological values were of adverse prognostic significance. An estimate of total extent of disease based on criteria for rating extent of involvement at 12 potential sites was a much more important prognostic factor related to response and survival than actual sites of involvement or the traditional "dominant site" classification. There was a trend, however, for patients with bone involvement to have a longer survival than did patients with metastases to other organ sites. Shorter survival times were observed among patients exposed to extensive prior radiotherapy and those who failed to respond to prior hormonal treatment. The prognostic variables identified in this paper should be used for the design and comparison of clinical trials in the future.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Mama/sangre , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Ciclofosfamida/administración & dosificación , Doxorrubicina/administración & dosificación , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , PronósticoRESUMEN
Forty-four patients with metastatic breast cancer who had previously received extensive conventional systemic therapy, including combination chemotherapy with doxorubicin, were treated with Bisantrene, a new anthracene derivative. The dose schedule was 250 to 300 mg/sq m body surface administered as a 1- to 2-hr i.v. infusion. Of 40 evaluable patients, there were nine partial responses, and 18 patients had stable disease. Responses were seen in all major sites of organ involvement with a median time to progression of 28 weeks. Moreover, responses were seen among patients who had either failed to respond or had demonstrated refractoriness to prior therapy with doxorubicin, suggesting an apparent lack of cross-resistance between doxorubicin and Bisantrene. Except for myelosuppression and one incidence of acute anaphylactoid reaction, Bisantrene was generally well tolerated by most patients. We believe that Bisantrene may ultimately have a major role in the effective treatment of metastatic breast cancer, and further clinical trials are warranted.
Asunto(s)
Antibióticos Antineoplásicos , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Antracenos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Doxorrubicina/uso terapéutico , Evaluación de Medicamentos , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la NeoplasiaRESUMEN
In practice, the human tumor clonogenic assay is workable for less than half of the patient population to which it is applied, since the remainder of the specimens fail to produce sufficient numbers of colonies. Thereby a bias may be introduced which could result in a false predictive value positive of the test. It is therefore necessary to compare the responses to treatment of patients whose tumors could be assayed in vitro to those whose tumors failed to grow adequately, to assure that the prevalence of treatment responders has not changed within the group of patients for which the assay worked. From an analysis of the treatment response of 70 patients with stage III and IV ovarian carcinomas and 70 patients with stage IV breast cancer, no selection bias did occur and no preferential in vitro growth of tumor samples from patients with treatment response was found.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Ensayo de Unidades Formadoras de Colonias , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Ensayo de Tumor de Célula Madre , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Ováricas/diagnósticoRESUMEN
Fifty-nine evaluable patients under 65 years of age with measurable metastatic breast cancer and without prior chemotherapy were randomly assigned to treatment with fluorouracil, Adriamycin (Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH), and cyclophosphamide (FAC) at standard or high doses (100% to 260% higher than standard FAC) following a dose escalation schedule. Patients randomized to the high-dose FAC received the first three cycles of therapy within a protected environment. Subsequent cycles for this group were administered at standard doses of FAC in an ambulatory setting, the same as for the control group. After reaching 450 mg/m2 of Adriamycin, patients in both groups continued treatment with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil until there was disease progression. Analysis of pretreatment patient characteristics showed an even distribution for most known pretreatment factors, although the control group had slightly (but nonsignificantly) more favorable prognostic characteristics. Fourteen patients (24%) achieved a complete remission (CR) and 32 (54%) achieved a partial remission (PR), for an overall major response rate of 78%. There were no differences in overall, CR, or PR rates between the high-dose FAC and control groups. The median response durations were 11 and 10 months for the protected environment and control groups, respectively, and the median survival was 20 months for both groups. Hematologic, gastrointestinal (GI), and infection-related complications were significantly more frequent and severe in the group treated with high-dose chemotherapy. Stomatitis, diarrhea, and skin toxicity were dose-limiting. However, there were no treatment-related deaths. High-dose induction combination chemotherapy with the agents used in this study failed to increase the response rate or survival duration, and resulted in a substantial increase in toxicity.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Ciclofosfamida/administración & dosificación , Doxorrubicina/administración & dosificación , Evaluación de Medicamentos , Femenino , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Estudios Prospectivos , Distribución Aleatoria , RiesgoRESUMEN
To test the hypothesis of whether high doses of chemotherapy in combination achieve higher response rates and longer durations of response and survival, we treated 33 pre- and perimenopausal patients with good performance status in a prospective trial with escalating doses of fluorouracil, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (FAC). Patients were randomly assigned to be treated within a protected environment (laminar air flow room), with prophylactic antibiotics, or in a standard hospital room. Important patient characteristics were equally distributed in the two treatment arms. A major objective response was observed in 27 of the 32 evaluable patients (84%), and 11 (34%) achieved a complete remission (CR). There was no significant difference in overall and complete response rates between the two treatment arms, nor was there a substantial difference in times to progression or survival between the groups treated in or out of the protected environment. Comparison of the results of this study with previously reported programs of FAC chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer shows that this study achieved higher overall and complete response rates. However, neither the time to progression, nor the survival of responders or the entire patient group was different from our previous experience with standard FAC chemotherapy. When the study was initiated in 1976, the proposed dose escalation represented high-dose chemotherapy. In retrospect, even the "high" doses used in this study represent only a modest increase over standard doses of chemotherapy. Much steeper dose escalations will be needed to evaluate the efficacy of high-dose chemotherapy in breast cancer, as well as the protective value of the protected environment and prophylactic antibiotics in metastatic breast cancer.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Ambiente Controlado , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Ciclofosfamida/administración & dosificación , Doxorrubicina/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Premedicación , Estudios Prospectivos , Distribución Aleatoria , Inducción de Remisión , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
We conducted a multicenter, phase II trial of continuous-infusion recombinant interleukin-2 (rIL-2) and lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) cells. Patients had advanced cancer, measurable disease, and a good performance level. Treatment included a 5-day continuous infusion of 18 x 10(6) IU/m2/d of rIL-2 followed by 1 day of rest, 4 days of leukapheresis to collect cells for in vitro augmentation of cellular cytotoxicity, and 5 more days of rIL-2 infusion with reinfusion of LAK cells for 3 successive days. Therapy was repeated after 2 weeks. There were 117 patients enrolled: 63% were males, with a median age of 51 years. Eighty-two percent were managed in oncology units, and 18% were in intensive care units. Six patients died within 1 month of initiating therapy. In renal cell carcinoma, the response rate was one of 31 patients (3%), with a median survival of 10.7 months. In melanoma, the response rate was four of 33 patients (12%), with a median survival of 6.1 months. For all other histologies, response rate was three of 53 patients (5%), with a median survival of 7.4 months. All responders were asymptomatic when therapy was initiated. This trial confirms the feasibility of administering continuous rIL-2 and LAK cells outside the intensive care unit environment. Antitumor activity in melanoma was similar to that seen in multicenter trials of bolus rIL-2 and LAK cells. Activity in renal cell cancer was disappointing.
Asunto(s)
Interleucina-2/uso terapéutico , Células Asesinas Activadas por Linfocinas , Neoplasias/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Interleucina-2/administración & dosificación , Interleucina-2/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/mortalidad , Neoplasias/patología , Proteínas Recombinantes/uso terapéutico , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted on data collected from the records of 619 patients with metastatic breast cancer in whom an Adriamycin-containing chemotherapeutic regimen was used. Using a forward, stepwise logistic regression procedure, several models or equations in which a small number of pretreatment factors were incorporated were generated and the probability of response to therapy was accurately predicted. The predictive ability of these models was tested retrospectively in 546 of the 619 patients from whom the data were derived and prospectively in a new population of 200 patients with metastatic breast cancer also treated with a therapeutically equivalent Adriamycin combination. Using similar univariate techniques, pretreatment factors were correlated with the length of survival after therapy. The proportional hazard model of Cox was used to develop a regression model relating survival to pretreatment characteristics in much the same manner as that of the response model. The total population of the initial group of patients was divided according to four levels of hazard ratio, and survival distributions were compared. This model also was tested progressively and its predictive capability was confirmed. The prediction of individual outcome is a valuable capability in the comparison of clinical trials and the continuing evaluation of biologic changes in patients with metastatic carcinoma; such a method is described in this paper.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Análisis de Varianza , Axila , Recuento de Células Sanguíneas , Análisis Químico de la Sangre , Neoplasias de la Mama/sangre , Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Doxorrubicina/administración & dosificación , Evaluación de Medicamentos , Femenino , Humanos , Metástasis Linfática , Pronóstico , Análisis de RegresiónRESUMEN
To determine the effectiveness of non-cross-resistant late-consolidation chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) and stage IV breast cancer, we review our experience with two regimens. Between 1985 and 1991, we enrolled 56 patients with LABC, who were treated with a doxorubicin-based adjuvant regimen, followed by a late-consolidation non-cross-resistant regimen containing methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, and cyclophosphamide. Between 1985 and 1996, a total of 45 patients with limited stage IV breast cancer underwent surgical excision of all evaluable disease, making them metastatic (stage IV) with no evaluable disease. Surgery was followed by a doxorubicin-containing regimen and then a late-consolidation non-cross-resistant regimen, which was either methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil, cisplatinum, and cyclophosphamide or 5-fluorouracil, mitomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin. Twenty-four patients with limited bone metastases that were unresectable were treated with a doxorubicin-containing regimen, radiation therapy to all sites of disease, and then one of the two late non-cross-resistant regimens. With a median follow-up of 84 months, 78% of patients with LABC are alive, and 68% are free of disease. After a median follow-up of 44 months, 53% of patients with stage IV with no evaluable disease are alive and free of disease. The use of non-cross-resistant late-consolidation chemotherapy is an effective strategy in the treatment of patients with LABC and selected patients with limited stage IV breast cancer.