Proximal junctional kyphosis in thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: risk factors and compensatory mechanisms in a multicenter national cohort.

INTRODUCTION: Proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) is a frequent complication, up to 46%, in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgical treatment (AIS). Several risk factors have been evoked but remain controversial. The purpose of this study was to analyze the incidence of PJK in a multicenter cohort of AIS patient and to determine risk factor for PJK. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Lenke I and II AIS patients operated between 2011 and 2015 (minimum of 2-years follow-up) were included. On fullspine X-rays, coronal and sagittal radiographic parameters were measured preoperatively, postoperatively and at final follow-up. Occurrence of radiological PJK corresponding to a 10° increase in the sagittal Cobb angle, measured between the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) and UIV + 2, between postoperative and 2-years follow-up X-rays, was reported. RESULTS: Among the 365 patients included, 15.6% (n = 57) developed a PJK and only 10 patients required a revision surgery. Preoperatively, PJK patients had significantly larger pelvic incidence (57° ± 13° vs. 51° ± 12°), larger lumbar lordosis (LL) (63° ± 12° vs. 57° ± 11°) and bigger C7 slope. Postoperatively (3 months), in the non-PJK group, thoracic kyphosis (TK) was increased and LL was not significantly different. However, postoperatively, in the PJK group, no significant change was observed in TK, whereas C7 slope decreased and LL significantly increased. There was also a postoperative change in inflection point which was located at a more proximal level in the PJK group. Between postoperative time and final follow-up, TK and LL significantly increased in the PJK group. CONCLUSION: PJK is a frequent complication in thoracic AIS, occurring 16%, but remains often asymptomatic (less than 3% of revisions in the entire cohort). An interesting finding is that patients with high pelvic incidence and consequently large LL and TK were more at risk of PJK. As demonstrated in ASD, one of the causes of PJK might be postoperative posterior imbalance that can be due to increased LL, insufficient TK or inflection point shift during surgery. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Trunk Growth in Early-Onset Idiopathic Scoliosis Measured With Biplanar Radiography.

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional and longitudinal retrospective study. OBJECTIVES: To measure thoracic dimensions and volume during growth in early-onset idiopathic scoliosis (EOIS) patients and to compare them to a population of asymptomatic adults and to the previous literature. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Data on trunk growth for scoliotic children between 6 and 14 years of age is sparse in the literature. METHODS: Thirty-six patients (29 girls and 7 boys, between 3 and 14 years old, average Cobb angle 33°±15°) were included, all with a minimum two-year follow-up. Sixty-one asymptomatic girls and 54 asymptomatic adults were included as control groups. All subjects underwent biplanar radiography and 3D reconstruction of the spine, pelvis, and rib cage. EOIS patients repeated their radiologic examination every six months. Cobb angle, rib cage volume, anteroposterior and transverse diameters, thoracic index, thoracic perimeter, pelvic incidence, and T1-T12 and T1-S1 distance were calculated. Reproducibility of measurement was assessed. RESULTS: Measurement reliability in such young patients was comparable to previous studies in adolescents and adults. Geometrical parameters of EOIS patients increased linearly with age. For instance, rib cage volume in girls with EOIS increased from 2200 cm3 at six to seven years of age to 4100 cm3 at 13-14 years (65% of adult values, 294 cm3/y). Comparison with asymptomatic girls showed that EOIS could affect growth spurt. Longitudinal analysis on a cohort of six girls who had a follow-up of six years confirmed the cross-sectional data. CONCLUSIONS: In this longitudinal and cross-sectional study, trunk growth between 3 and 14 years of age was characterized, for the first time, with biplanar radiography and 3D reconstruction. The results can be useful to estimate patient growth and thus have potential application in the surgical planning of EOIS patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, retrospective study.

Medial to posterior release procedure after failure of functional treatment in clubfoot: a prospective study.

PURPOSE: Two conservative techniques for clubfoot treatment are still being debated and depend upon the institution's expertise. For >40 years, the current institution has been a pioneer in the development of the physiotherapy method; however, some severe deformities remain resistant to this method which causes pain, sprains, and difficulties wearing shoes. Therefore, a surgical approach was developed simultaneously for the treatment of these residual or recurring clubfeet. The procedure reproduces the same chronological steps by performing forefoot derotation before correcting hindfoot equinus. The aim of the current study was to assess the results of this surgical technique. METHODS: All clubfeet undergoing surgery between October 1995 and February 2009 were prospectively included. Initial severity was based on Dimeglio's classification and final outcomes on the International Clubfoot Study Group (ICFSG) outcome evaluation system. Last follow-up results were assessed by physical examination and radiographs. RESULTS: A total of 137 patients with severe clubfeet (mean Dimeglio score 12.0) underwent surgery. At the mean follow-up of 10.8 years, mean ICFSG score was 4.3 (range 0-23), and 12 % required revision surgery. The rate of undercorrection and overcorrection was low (17 pes-plano-valgus ft and 11 ft with undercorrection). Eight feet had a fixed deformity. CONCLUSIONS: Severe deformities are more resistant to conservative techniques even for institutions with large experience. These deformities require further treatment, including surgery if necessary. The medial to posterior soft-tissue release is a valuable technique with stable results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.