Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 25
Filtrar
1.
J Surg Oncol ; 125(3): 414-424, 2022 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34617590

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Few empiric studies evaluate the effects of regionalization on pancreatic cancer care. METHODS: We queried the National Cancer Database to identify patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy for clinical stage I/II pancreatic adenocarcinoma between 2006 and 2015. Facilities were categorized by annual pancreatectomy volume. Textbook oncologic outcome was defined as a margin negative resection, appropriate lymph node assessment, no prolonged hospitalization, no 30-day readmission, no 90-day mortality, and timely receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy. Multivariable regression adjusted for comorbid disease, pathologic stage, and facility characteristics was used to evaluate the relationship between facility volume and textbook outcome. RESULTS: Sixteen thousand six hundred and two patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy; 3566 (21.5%) had a textbook outcome. Operations performed at high volume centers increased each year (45.8% in 2006 to 64.2% in 2015, p < 0.001) as did textbook outcome rates (14.3%-26.2%, p < 0.001). Surgical volume was associated with textbook outcome. High volume centers demonstrated higher unadjusted rates of textbook outcome (25.4% vs. 11.8% p < 0.01) and increased adjusted odds of textbook outcome relative to low volume centers (odds ratio: 2.39, [2.02, 2.85], p < 0.001). Textbook outcome was associated with improved overall survival independent of volume. CONCLUSIONS: Regionalization of care for pancreaticoduodenectomy to high volume centers is ongoing and is associated with improved quality of care.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Pancreatectomía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Pancreaticoduodenectomía , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Anciano , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Hospitalización , Hospitales de Alto Volumen , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Programas Médicos Regionales , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
2.
J Surg Res ; 257: 349-355, 2021 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32892130

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Bile duct injury (BDI) during cholecystectomy requiring biliary enteric reconstruction (BER) is associated with increased risk of postoperative mortality and substantive increases in costs of care. The impact of the timing of repair on overall costs of care is poorly understood. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Florida State databases (2006-2015) were queried to identify patients undergoing BER within 1-y of cholecystectomy performed for benign biliary disease. Patients were then categorized by the time interval between cholecystectomy to BER: early (≤3 d), intermediate (4 d to 6 wk), or delayed (>6 wk). By repair timing strategy, 1-y outcomes were aggregated, including charges, inpatient costs, aggregate length of stay, and inpatient mortality. RESULTS: Of 563,887 patients undergoing cholecystectomy, 1168 required a BER (0.21%) within 1-y of cholecystectomy. Early BER was performed in 560 patients (47.9%), intermediate BER in 439 patients (37.6%), and delayed BER in 169 (14.5%) patients. On multivariable analysis adjusting for patient, procedure, and facility factors, intermediate BER demonstrated an increased risk of mortality (odds ratio 2.04, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.16-3.56) and increased aggregate inpatient cost (+$12,472; 95% CI: $6421-$18,524) relative to early BER. There was no notable difference in adjusted risk of inpatient mortality between the early and delayed BER cohorts (odds ratio 0.90; 95% CI: 0.32-1.25), but delayed BER was associated with increased aggregate inpatient costs (+$45,111; 95% CI: $36,813-$53,409). CONCLUSIONS: When compared with delayed BER, early repair was associated with shorter aggregate inpatient hospitalization without increased postoperative mortality. Intermediate timing of repair is associated with increased costs and risk of mortality.


Asunto(s)
Conductos Biliares/lesiones , Conductos Biliares/cirugía , Colecistectomía/efectos adversos , Tiempo de Tratamiento/economía , Anciano , Colecistectomía/economía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo
3.
Crit Care Med ; 48(9): 1296-1303, 2020 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32590387

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Identification and outcomes in patients with sepsis have improved over the years, but little data are available in patients with trauma who develop sepsis. We aimed to examine the cost and epidemiology of sepsis in patients hospitalized after trauma. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PATIENTS: National Inpatient Sample. INTERVENTIONS: Sepsis was identified between 2012 and 2016 using implicit and explicit International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Revision codes. Analyses were stratified by injury severity score greater than or equal to 15. Annual trends were modeled using generalized linear models. Survey-adjusted logistic regression was used to compare the odds for in-hospital mortality, and the average marginal effects were calculated to compare the cost of hospitalization with and without sepsis. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: There were 320,450 (SE = 3,642) traumatic injury discharges from U.S. hospitals with sepsis between 2012 and 2016, representing 6.0% (95% CI, 5.9-6.0%) of the total trauma population (n = 5,329,714; SE = 47,447). In-hospital mortality associated with sepsis after trauma did not change over the study period (p > 0.40). In adjusted analysis, severe (injury severity score ≥ 15) and nonsevere injured septic patients had an odds ratio of 1.39 (95% CI, 1.31-1.47) and 4.32 (95% CI, 4.06-4.59) for in-hospital mortality, respectively. The adjusted marginal cost for sepsis compared with nonsepsis was $16,646 (95% CI, $16,294-$16,997), and it was greater than the marginal cost for severe injury compared with nonsevere injury $8,851 (95% CI, $8,366-$8,796). CONCLUSIONS: While national trends for sepsis mortality have improved over the years, our analysis of National Inpatient Sample did not support this trend in the trauma population. The odds risk for death after sepsis and the cost of care remained high regardless of severity of injury. More rigor is needed in tracking sepsis after trauma and evaluating the effectiveness of hospital mandates and policies to improve sepsis care in patients after trauma.


Asunto(s)
Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Sepsis/economía , Sepsis/epidemiología , Heridas y Lesiones/epidemiología , Anciano , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Características de la Residencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Sepsis/mortalidad , Factores Socioeconómicos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
4.
J Voice ; 37(4): 633.e1-633.e6, 2023 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34024697

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: In a postlaryngectomy patient, tracheoesophageal (TE) speech is considered to be the most effective and preferred method of communication. Previous research has demonstrated that despite an appropriately sized TE prosthesis placement at the time of puncture, there are a portion of patients that require resizing postoperatively. The purpose of this study was to report on the variability of the tracheoesophageal prosthesis length. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Tertiary care academic medical center. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of 62 patients who underwent secondary tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP) at a tertiary care academic medical center from January 2008 to November 2019. Patient demographic information, average changes in prosthesis length, number of prosthesis adjustments, and timing of prosthesis exchanges were collected. RESULTS: 62 patients met criteria for study inclusion. Mean age was 61.96 years old with 49 being male (79%) and 13 (21%) females. Overall change in prosthesis length was - 3.85 mm ± 3.58 with time to first prosthesis change at 2.29 months ± 2.73. There was an average of 4.37 changes ± 3.43 before reaching a stable length. Twenty-six patients (41.9%) had increases in their prosthesis length resulting in closure of the tracheoesophageal fistula requiring seven patients (11.3%) to return to the operating room for repuncturing. History of smoking (P = 0.02), Blom-Singer prosthesis type (P = 0.03), and larger diameter (P = 0.01) appeared to be predisposing factors for a fluctuating prosthesis length. CONCLUSION: Tracheoesophageal prosthesis length decreases over time for secondary punctures, requiring adjustments with a speech language pathologist. There are a clinically significant portion that have fluctuations in prosthesis length resulting in an increased risk for requiring re-puncturing.


Asunto(s)
Prótesis e Implantes , Tráquea , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Laringectomía/rehabilitación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tráquea/anatomía & histología , Tráquea/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ajuste de Prótesis/estadística & datos numéricos , Fístula Traqueoesofágica/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Prótesis e Implantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Riesgo
5.
J Am Coll Surg ; 235(1): 60-68, 2022 07 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35703963

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recent socioeconomic pressures in healthcare and work hour resections have limited opportunities for resident autonomy and independent decision-making. We sought to evaluate whether contemporary senior residents are being given the opportunity to operate independently and whether patient outcomes are affected when the attending is not directly involved in an operation. STUDY DESIGN: The VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program (VASQIP) Database was queried to identify patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy between 2004 and 2019. Cases were categorized as "attending" or "resident" depending on whether the attending surgeon was scrubbed. Cohorts were 1:1 propensity score-matched (PSM) for demographics, comorbidities, and facility case-mix. Clinical outcomes for matched cohorts were compared by standard methods. RESULTS: There were 23,831 records for patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy; 20,568 (86%) performed with the attending scrubbed, and 3,263 (14%) without the attending scrubbed. Over time there was a significant decrease in the proportion of cases without the attending scrubbed, 18% in 2004-2009 to 13% in 2015-2019 (p < 0.001). On PSM, 3,263 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy by the residents without the attending scrubbed were successfully matched (1:1) to cases with the attending scrubbed. On comparison of matched cohorts, procedures performed without the attending scrubbed were statistically longer (102 vs 98 minutes, p = 0.001) but with no difference in rates of postoperative complications (5% vs 5%, p = 0.9). CONCLUSION: In comparison with cases done with more direct attending involvement, residents perform laparoscopic cholecystectomies efficiently without increased complications. Over time, attendings are more frequently scrubbed for the operation.


Asunto(s)
Colecistectomía Laparoscópica , Internado y Residencia , Cirujanos , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica/efectos adversos , Competencia Clínica , Humanos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Puntaje de Propensión
6.
J Am Coll Surg ; 235(1): 119-127, 2022 07 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35703969

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Current studies evaluating outcomes for open, laparoscopic, and robotic inguinal hernia repair, in general, include small numbers of robotic cases and are not powered to allow a direct comparison of the 3 approaches to repair. STUDY DESIGN: We queried the Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database to identify patients undergoing initial elective inguinal hernia repair between 2013 and 2017. Propensity score matching and multivariable logistic regression were used to make risk-adjusted assessments of association between surgical approach and outcome. RESULTS: A total of 39,358 patients underwent initial elective inguinal hernia repair; 32,881 (84%) underwent an open approach, 6,135 (16%) underwent a laparoscopic approach, and 342 (1%) underwent a robotic-assisted approach. Two hundred sixty-six (1%) patients had a recurrent repair performed during follow-up. On univariate comparison, patients undergoing a robotic-assisted approach had longer operative times for unilateral repair than those undergoing either an open or laparoscopic (73 ± 31 vs 74 ± 29 vs 107 ± 41 minutes; p < 0.001) approach. On multivariable logistic regression, patients with a higher BMI had an increased adjusted risk of a postoperative complication, but there was no association between surgical approach and complication rate. Three hundred forty-two patients undergoing robotic repair were 1:3:3 propensity score matched to 1,026 patients undergoing laparoscopic and 1,026 undergoing open repair. On comparison of matched cohorts, there were no statistical differences between approaches regarding recurrence (0.6% vs 0.8% vs 0.6%, p > 0.05) or complication rate (0.6% vs 1.2% vs 1.2%, p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing initial elective inguinal hernia repair, rates of hernia recurrence are low independent of surgical approach. Both robotic and laparoscopic approaches demonstrate rates of early postoperative morbidity and recurrence similar to those for the open approach. The robotic approach is associated with longer operative time than either laparoscopic or open repair.


Asunto(s)
Hernia Inguinal , Laparoscopía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Hernia Inguinal/cirugía , Herniorrafia/efectos adversos , Humanos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Tempo Operativo , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/efectos adversos
7.
Am J Surg ; 223(3): 527-530, 2022 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34974888

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Few studies evaluate the efficacy of adjuvant radiotherapy (aXRT) in patients with retroperitoneal liposarcoma undergoing resection to histologically positive (R1) margins. METHODS: We queried the National Cancer Database to identify patients undergoing R1 resection for localized, large (>5 cm) low and moderate grade retroperitoneal liposarcoma between 2004 and 2016. Kaplan Meier method was used to compare overall survival (OS) for patients receiving aXRT to a 1:2 propensity-matched cohort of patients undergoing resection alone. RESULTS: A total of 322 (76.5%) patients underwent R1 resection alone, while 99 (23.5%) underwent resection followed by aXRT. The 99 receiving aXRT were successfully 1:2 propensity-score matched to 198 undergoing resection alone. There was no difference in 5-year OS between matched cohorts (69.7% vs 76.2%, p = 0.40). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing R1 resection of moderate- and well-differentiated retroperitoneal liposarcoma, use of aXRT is not associated with an improvement in OS.


Asunto(s)
Liposarcoma , Neoplasias Retroperitoneales , Humanos , Liposarcoma/radioterapia , Liposarcoma/cirugía , Radioterapia Adyuvante , Neoplasias Retroperitoneales/radioterapia , Neoplasias Retroperitoneales/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos
8.
Surgery ; 171(3): 598-606, 2022 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34844760

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The amount of time surgical trainees spend operating independently has been reduced by work-hour restrictions and shifts in the health care environment that impede autonomy. Few studies evaluate the association between clinical outcome and resident autonomy. METHODS: The Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried to identify patients undergoing partial colectomy for neoplasm between 2004 and 2019. Rectal resections, emergency procedures, and those involving postgraduate year 1 and 2 residents were excluded. Records were categorized as performed with the attending scrubbed or not scrubbed. Hierarchical logistic regression was used to identify factors independently associated with operative time, morbidity, and mortality. RESULTS: In total, 7,347 patients met inclusion criteria; 6,890 (93.6%) were categorized as attending scrubbed and 457 (6.4%) as attending not scrubbed. The cohorts were similar in terms of patient demographics, including age, race, body mass index, and American Society of Anesthesiologists class. There were no differences between cohorts in terms of operative time (attending not scrubbed 3.02 hours, attending scrubbed 3.07 hours, P = .42). On hierarchical logistic regression adjusted for age, gender, race, body mass index, functional status, cancer location, facility operative level, wound class, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, length of operation, operative modality (open or minimally invasive), postgraduate year of resident, and year, there were no differences in odds of complications, major morbidity, or mortality based on attending involvement. CONCLUSION: Colectomies performed by residents with appropriate levels of autonomy are efficient and safe. Our results indicate that attending surgeon judgment regarding resident autonomy is sound and that educational environments can be designed to foster resident independence and preserve clinical quality, safety, and efficiency.


Asunto(s)
Colectomía/educación , Neoplasias del Colon/cirugía , Internado y Residencia , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Autonomía Profesional , Anciano , Colectomía/efectos adversos , Neoplasias del Colon/mortalidad , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
Surgery ; 171(3): 703-710, 2022 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34872744

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Prior studies evaluating the effect of margin status on clinical outcome in patients undergoing resection for intrahepatic and extrahepatic hilar cholangiocarcinoma include small numbers of patients with histologically positive margins. The value of margin negative resection in these cases remains unclear. METHODS: We queried the National Cancer Database to identify patients undergoing resection for clinical stage I to III intrahepatic and extrahepatic hilar between 2004 and 2015. Patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy and those having <3 lymph nodes examined were excluded. Patients undergoing positive resection were 1:1 propensity matched to those undergoing negative resection. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to compare overall survival for the matched cohorts. RESULTS: In the study, 3,618 patients met the inclusion criteria, and 3,018 (83.4%) underwent negative resection; 600 (16.6%) positive resection. Patients undergoing negative resection had smaller tumors (2.97 ± 0.07 cm vs 3.49 ± 0.15 cm), were less likely to have stage 3 disease (16.7% vs 25.7%) and to receive adjuvant radiation (27.1% vs 45.7%) and chemotherapy (49.4% vs 61.0%) than those undergoing positive resection (all P < .05). On comparison of matched cohorts, patients undergoing negative resection had longer median overall survival (24.5 ± 0.02 vs 19.1 ± 0.02 months) and higher rates of 5-year overall survival (24.5% vs 16.7%) than those undergoing positive resection (P < .01). CONCLUSION: In patients presenting with resectable intrahepatic and extrahepatic hilar, negative resection is associated with improved overall survival. Extended resections performed in an effort to clear surgical margins are warranted in patients fit for such procedures.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/mortalidad , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/cirugía , Hepatectomía , Tumor de Klatskin/mortalidad , Tumor de Klatskin/cirugía , Márgenes de Escisión , Anciano , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/patología , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Tumor de Klatskin/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Puntaje de Propensión , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia
10.
Surgery ; 171(3): 741-746, 2022 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34895770

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation offers a potential for curative-intent treatment in patients presenting with non-metastatic intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma that is not amenable to partial hepatectomy. There is little empiric evidence evaluating the efficacy of liver transplantation in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. METHODS: We queried the National Cancer Database to identify patients presenting with histologically confirmed clinical stage I to III intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma between 2004 and 2016. Propensity scoring was used to develop matched cohorts of patients undergoing treatment with liver transplantation, surgical resection, or chemotherapy alone. Kaplan Meier methods were used to compare rates of overall survival. RESULTS: One thousand four hundred and eleven patients met inclusion criteria. Of these, 66 (4.7%) underwent liver transplantation, 461 (32.7%) underwent surgical resection, and 884 (62.6%) were treated with chemotherapy alone. On adjusted analysis, patients undergoing liver transplantation were more likely to be male (odds ratio 4.35, 95% confidence interval [0.12, 0.42]), have a Charlson Comorbidity Score ≥2 (odds ratio 3.11, 95% confidence interval [1.44, 6.57]), and to receive both neoadjuvant (odds ratio 2.78, 95% confidence interval [1.36,5.75], and adjuvant (odds ratio 1.94, 95% confidence interval [0.97, 3.87]) systemic therapy than those undergoing resection. On Kaplan Meier analysis, patients undergoing liver transplantation demonstrated rates of 5-year overall survival (36.1% vs 34.7%, P = .53) that were statistically identical to those for stage-matched and margin-matched patients undergoing resection but significantly better than those for stage-matched patients treated with systemic therapy alone (36.1% vs 5.3%, P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing liver transplantation for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma demonstrate overall survival profiles similar to stage-matched and margin-matched patients undergoing surgical resection. Liver transplantation is an effective treatment modality in select patients presenting with localized intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/cirugía , Colangiocarcinoma/cirugía , Hepatectomía , Trasplante de Hígado , Anciano , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/mortalidad , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/patología , Colangiocarcinoma/mortalidad , Colangiocarcinoma/patología , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Puntaje de Propensión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
11.
Am J Surg ; 223(3): 521-525, 2022 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34933767

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Small-sized gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) have limited malignant potential. Few studies evaluate the safety and efficacy of expectant management (EM) for patients presenting with small GIST. METHODS: We queried the National Cancer Database to identify patients ≤65 years presenting with GISTs smaller than 3 cm in size between 2004 and 2015. Patients undergoing EM were 1:3 propensity score matched for relevant covariates to patients undergoing resection. Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis of matched cohorts was used to evaluate the association between EM and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: 1330 patients met inclusion criteria; 966 (72.6%) had gastric GISTs. 1196 (89.9%) underwent resection; 134 (10.1%) EM. 117 patients undergoing EM were propensity-matched to 356 patients undergoing resection. There was no difference in 5-year OS between patients undergoing EM and those undergoing resection (95.7% vs 92.6%, p = 0.4882). CONCLUSIONS: Survival for small GISTs is similar with expectant management or resection.


Asunto(s)
Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal , Neoplasias Gástricas , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal/cirugía , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Espera Vigilante
12.
Surgery ; 172(6): 1823-1828, 2022 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36096963

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Published studies examining the efficacy of liver transplantation in patients presenting with hepatocellular cancer beyond the traditional Milan criteria for liver transplantation have primarily been single institution series with limited ability to compare outcomes to alternative methods of management. METHODS: We queried the National Cancer Database to identify patients presenting between 2004 and 2016 with histologically confirmed clinical stage III and IVA hepatocellular cancer. Multivariable regression was used to identify factors associated with liver transplantation. Patients undergoing liver transplantation were 1:1 propensity score-matched for age, demographics, comorbid disease, clinical stage, and histologic resection margin to those undergoing surgical resection. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare overall survival profiles for matched cohorts. RESULTS: Seven hundred and ninety-two patients met inclusion criteria-590 (74.5%) underwent surgical resection and 202 (25.5%) liver transplantation. On adjusted analysis, patients undergoing liver transplantation were less likely to have advanced age (>60 years; odds ratio 0.39, 95% confidence interval [0.21-0.71]) and to be of Black race (odds ratio 0.42, 95% confidence interval [0.23-0.73]) or Asian (odds ratio 0.25, 95% confidence interval [0.11-0.53]) ethnicity but were more likely to have advanced (Charlson score >2) comorbidity scores, (odds ratio 2.48, 95% confidence interval [1.58-3.90]) and more likely to have private health insurance (odds ratio 4.17, 95% confidence interval [1.31-18.66]) than those undergoing surgical resection. On Kaplan-Meier analysis of matched cohorts, patients undergoing liver transplantation demonstrated significantly better rates of 5-year overall survival (65.3% vs 26.3%, P < .0001) and longer median overall survival times than those undergoing resection (53.1 ± 2.78 vs 26.9 ± 1.20 months, P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Liver transplantation offers the potential to be an effective treatment modality in select patients presenting with stage III and IVA hepatocellular cancer.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Trasplante de Hígado , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Márgenes de Escisión , Resultado del Tratamiento
13.
Am J Surg ; 223(3): 470-474, 2022 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34815028

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We evaluate the association between attending surgeon involvement and clinical outcome in elective inguinal hernia repairs performed by residents. METHODS: Patients undergoing initial elective unilateral inguinal hernia repair between 2004 and 2019 were identified using the Veterans Administration Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database. The level of attending surgeon involvement was categorized as active (attending scrubbed [AS]) or passive (supervising the resident's performance but not scrubbed [ANS]). AS and ANS herniorrhaphies were 1:1 propensity matched for patient demographics, comorbidities, surgical approach, resident postgraduate level, and year of repair. Rates of complication and recurrence for matched cohorts were compared by standard methods. RESULTS: 30,784 patients met inclusion criteria. 5136 (17%) repairs were performed without the attending scrubbed. On comparison of matched-cohorts, overall complication rates (1.7% vs 1.2%, p = 0.07) and rates of recurrence (1.9% vs 1.4%, p = 0.041) for patients undergoing herniorrhaphy AS were statistically similar to those performed ANS. CONCLUSION: Supervised independence in elective inguinal hernia repair performed by surgical residents is not associated with inferior clinical outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Hernia Inguinal , Internado y Residencia , Laparoscopía , Hernia Inguinal/cirugía , Herniorrafia/métodos , Humanos , Recurrencia , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
14.
Am J Surg ; 221(3): 549-553, 2021 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33371951

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Few studies evaluate the relationships between surgical approach, histologic margin, and overall survival in gastrointestinal stromal tumor. We test the hypothesis that margin positive resection is associated with compromised overall survival. METHODS: We queried the National Cancer Data Base to identify patients undergoing resections for gastrointestinal stromal tumors ≤3 cm in size between 2010 and 2015. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with positive microscopic margins on final pathology. Cox proportional hazard methods were used to evaluate factors associated with overall survival. RESULTS: 2064 patients met inclusion criteria; 135 (6.5%) had a microscopically positive surgical margin. On multivariable regression, minimally invasive approach was not associated with risk of a positive margin (OR 1.06 95% CI [0.71, 1.59]). On Cox analysis, positive margin status was not associated with OS (R1: 1.03, CI [0.46-2.31], reference R0). CONCLUSIONS: Positive microscopic surgical margins are not associated with compromised overall survival in patients undergoing resection of small gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Minimally invasive surgical approaches do not compromise oncologic outcomes in these cases.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/cirugía , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal/mortalidad , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal/cirugía , Márgenes de Escisión , Anciano , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/patología , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal/patología , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia
15.
Surgery ; 169(3): 636-643, 2021 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32951904

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Few studies evaluate the impact of unhealthy alcohol and drug use on the risk and severity of postoperative outcomes after upper gastrointestinal and pancreatic oncologic resections. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample was queried to identify patients undergoing total gastrectomy, esophagectomy, total pancreatectomy, and pancreaticoduodenectomy between 2012 and 2015. Unhealthy alcohol and drug use was assessed by the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, and National Inpatient Sample coder designation. Multivariable regression was used to identify associations between alcohol and drug use and postoperative complication, duration of stay, hospital cost, and mortality. RESULTS: In the study, 59,490 patients met inclusion criteria; 2,060 (3.5%) had unhealthy alcohol use; 1,265 (2.1%) had unhealthy drug use. Postoperative complication rates were higher in patients with alcohol and drug use than in abstainers (67.5% vs 62.8% vs 57.2%; P < .01). On multivariable regression, alcohol use was independently associated with increased risk of a nonwithdrawal complication (odds ratio 1.33 [1.05, 1.68]), and alcohol and drug use were independently associated with increased length of stay (1.54 [0.12, 2.96]) and 2.22 [0.90, 3.55] days) and cost ($5,471 [$60, $10,881] and $4,022 [$402, $7,643]), but not mortality. CONCLUSION: Unhealthy substance use is associated with increased rates of postoperative complications, prolonged length of stay, and costs in patients undergoing major upper gastrointestinal and pancreatic oncologic resections. Screening and abstinence interventions should be incorporated into the preoperative care pathways for these patients.


Asunto(s)
Alcoholismo/epidemiología , Alcoholismo/etiología , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/complicaciones , Costos de Hospital , Tiempo de Internación , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/complicaciones , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/etiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Análisis Factorial , Femenino , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/cirugía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Vigilancia en Salud Pública
16.
J Burn Care Res ; 42(2): 311-322, 2021 03 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32842148

RESUMEN

Burn patients experience erythropoietin resistant anemia in which early commitment and late maturation of erythroblasts are defective. The authors previously showed that propranolol (Prop) treatment restores erythroid committed progenitors, but terminal maturation remains impaired. Hemoglobinization and maturation occur during terminal erythropoiesis and these processes are aided by an erythroblast intrinsic functional protein called alpha-hemoglobin stabilizing protein (AHSP). The authors evaluated the role of AHSP in PBMC- (peripheral blood mono nuclear cell) derived erythroblasts and the implications of Prop in burn patients. Blood samples were collected at three time points from 17 patients receiving standard burn care (SBC) or Prop. Five healthy volunteers provided control plasma (CP). PBMCs were placed in biphasic cultures with 5% autologous plasma (BP) or CP. Erythroblasts were harvested during mid and late maturation stages; the percentage of AHSP+ erythroblasts, AHSP expression, and relative distribution of reticulocytes and polychromatophilic erythroblasts (PolyE) were determined by cytometry. During the second time point (7-10 days postburn), Prop cohort required 35% less transfusions. At mid maturation, PBMCs from Prop-treated patients cultured in BP had 33% more AHSP+ erythroblasts and 40% more AHSP expression compared with SBC. Furthermore, at late maturation, Prop had 50% more reticulocytes and 30% less PolyEs in CP vs BP compared with SBC (11% and 6%, respectively). AHSP is positively associated with late-stage maturation of PBMC-derived erythroblasts in the presence of CP. Albeit transiently, this is more pronounced in Prop than SBC. Early administration of propranolol in burn patients supports erythropoiesis via the chaperone AHSP.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapéutico , Proteínas Sanguíneas/metabolismo , Quemaduras/terapia , Eritropoyesis/fisiología , Chaperonas Moleculares/metabolismo , Propranolol/uso terapéutico , Quemaduras/metabolismo , Humanos
17.
Surg Open Sci ; 6: 15-20, 2021 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34409279

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Achieving microscopically negative (R0) surgical margins in gallbladder cancer often requires a partial hepatectomy with associated risk of morbidity and potential to delay adjuvant therapy. Prior studies on the importance of margin status in resectable gall bladder cancer include small numbers of patients with positive (R1) resection margins and are underpowered. METHODS: We queried the National Cancer Database to identify patients undergoing resection of gallbladder adenocarcinoma between 2004 and 2015. Patients presenting with metastatic disease, those who received neoadjuvant therapy, and those with fewer than 3 lymph nodes assessed were excluded. 1:1 propensity score matching was used to develop cohorts undergoing either R0 or R1 resection, matched for demographic, pathologic, and facility characteristics. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess the association between margin status and overall survival. RESULTS: A total of 1,439 patients met inclusion criteria; 1,285 underwent R0 and 154 underwent R1 resection. On Kaplan-Meier analysis of propensity-matched cohorts, patients undergoing R0 resection had a median overall survival that was 18 months longer than those undergoing R1 resection (34.6 ±â€¯2.0 months vs 16.3 ±â€¯1.7 months, P < .001). CONCLUSION: In patients presenting with resectable gallbladder adenocarcinoma, margin-negative resection is associated with significant improvement in overall survival.

18.
Surgery ; 169(3): 671-677, 2021 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32951903

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We applied various machine learning algorithms to a large national dataset to model the risk of postoperative sepsis after appendectomy to evaluate utility of such methods and identify factors associated with postoperative sepsis in these patients. METHODS: The National Surgery Quality Improvement Program database was used to identify patients undergoing appendectomy between 2005 and 2017. Logistic regression, support vector machines, random forest decision trees, and extreme gradient boosting machines were used to model the occurrence of postoperative sepsis. RESULTS: In the study, 223,214 appendectomies were identified; 2,143 (0.96%) were indicated as having postoperative sepsis. Logistic regression (area under the curve 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.68-0.73), random forest decision trees (area under the curve 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.68-0.73), and extreme gradient boosting (area under the curve 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.68-0.73) afforded similar performance, while support vector machines (area under the curve 0.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.50-0.52) had worse performance. Variable importance analyses identified preoperative congestive heart failure, transfusion, and acute renal failure as predictors of postoperative sepsis. CONCLUSION: Machine learning methods can be used to predict the development of sepsis after appendectomy with moderate accuracy. Such predictive modeling has potential to ultimately allow for preoperative recognition of patients at risk for developing postoperative sepsis after appendectomy thus facilitating early intervention and reducing morbidity.


Asunto(s)
Apendicectomía/efectos adversos , Aprendizaje Automático , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Sepsis/diagnóstico , Sepsis/etiología , Adulto , Apendicectomía/métodos , Área Bajo la Curva , Susceptibilidad a Enfermedades , Análisis Factorial , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Teóricos , Pronóstico , Vigilancia en Salud Pública , Curva ROC
19.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 90(6): 951-958, 2021 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34016919

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The use of whole-body computed tomography (WBCT) in awake, clinically stable injured patients is controversial. It is associated with unnecessary radiation exposure and increased cost. We evaluate use of computed tomography (CT) imaging during the initial evaluation of injured patients at American College of Surgeons Levels I and II trauma centers (TCs) after blunt trauma. METHODS: We identified adult blunt trauma patients after motor vehicle crash (MVC) from the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database between 2007 and 2016 at Level I or II TCs. We defined awake clinically stable patients as those with systolic blood pressure of 100 mm Hg or higher with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 15. Computed tomography imaging had to have been performed within 2 hours of arrival. Whole-body computed tomography was defined as simultaneous CT of the head, chest and abdomen, and selective CT if only one to two aforementioned regions were imaged. Patients were stratified by Injury Severity Score (ISS). RESULTS: There were 217,870 records for analysis; 131,434 (60.3%) had selective CT, and 86,436 (39.7%) had WBCT. Overall, there was an increasing trend in WBCT utilization over the study period (p < 0.001). In patients with ISS less than 10, WBCT was utilized more commonly at Level II versus Level I TCs in patients discharged from the emergency department (26.9% vs. 18.3%, p < 0.001), which had no surgical procedure(s) (81.4% vs. 80.3%, p < 0.001) and no injury of the head (53.7% vs. 52.4%, p = 0.008) or abdomen (83.8% vs. 82.1%, p = 0.001). The risk-adjusted odds of WBCT was two times higher at Level II TC vs. Level I (odds ratio, 1.88; 95% confidence interval 1.82-1.94; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Whole-body computed tomography utilization is increasing relative to selective CT. This increasing utilization is highest at Level II TCs in patients with low ISSs, and in patients without associated head or abdominal injury. The findings have implications for quality improvement and cost reduction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Care management, Level IV.


Asunto(s)
Accidentes de Tránsito , Uso Excesivo de los Servicios de Salud/tendencias , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/tendencias , Heridas no Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Ahorro de Costo , Bases de Datos Factuales/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/tendencias , Femenino , Escala de Coma de Glasgow , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Masculino , Uso Excesivo de los Servicios de Salud/economía , Uso Excesivo de los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/economía , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/economía , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros Traumatológicos/economía , Centros Traumatológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros Traumatológicos/tendencias , Heridas no Penetrantes/etiología , Adulto Joven
20.
J Am Coll Surg ; 233(1): 120-129.e5, 2021 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33887482

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Mangled extremities are one of the most difficult injuries for trauma surgeons to manage. We compare limb salvage rates for a limb-threatening lower extremity injuries managed at Level I vs Level II trauma centers (TCs). STUDY DESIGN: We identified all adult patients with a limb-threatening injury who underwent primary amputation or limb salvage (LS) using the American College of Surgeons (ACS) Trauma Quality Improvement Program database at ACS Level I vs II TCs between 2007 and 2017. A limb-threatening injury was defined as an open tibial fracture with concurrent arterial injury (Gustilo type IIIc). Multivariable analysis and propensity score matching were performed to minimize confounding by indication. RESULTS: There were 712 records for analysis; 391 (54.9%) LS performed and 321 (45.1%) underwent amputation. The rate of LS was statistically higher among patients treated at Level I TCs vs those treated at Level II TCs (47.4% vs 34.8%; p = 0.01). Patients with penetrating injuries (13% vs 9.5%; p = 0.046) and tibial/peroneal artery injury (72.9% vs 50.4%; p < 0.001), as opposed to popliteal artery injury (30.8% vs 58.8%; p < 0.001), were more likely to have LS. The risk-adjusted odds of LS was 3.13 times higher at Level I TCs vs Level II TCs (95% CI, 1.59 to 6.34; p = 0.001). Limb salvage rates were significantly higher at Level I TCs compared with Level II TCs (53.0% vs 34.8%; p = 0.004), even after propensity matching. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with a mangled extremity, limb salvage rates are 50% higher at Level I TCs compared with Level II TCs, independent of case mix and injury severity.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas Abiertas/cirugía , Recuperación del Miembro/estadística & datos numéricos , Extremidad Inferior/cirugía , Fracturas de la Tibia/cirugía , Centros Traumatológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/cirugía , Adulto , Amputación Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Fracturas Abiertas/complicaciones , Fracturas Abiertas/epidemiología , Humanos , Traumatismos de la Pierna/complicaciones , Traumatismos de la Pierna/epidemiología , Traumatismos de la Pierna/cirugía , Recuperación del Miembro/métodos , Extremidad Inferior/lesiones , Fracturas de la Tibia/complicaciones , Fracturas de la Tibia/epidemiología , Centros Traumatológicos/clasificación , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/complicaciones , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA