Initial combination of linagliptin and metformin compared with linagliptin monotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes and marked hyperglycaemia: a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, parallel group, multinational clinical trial.

AIMS: To evaluate glucose-lowering treatment strategies with linagliptin and metformin in people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes and marked hyperglycaemia, a prevalent population for which few dedicated studies of oral antidiabetes drugs have been conducted. METHODS: A total of 316 patients, with type 2 diabetes diagnosed for ≤12 months and with glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) concentration in the range 8.5-12.0%, were randomized 1:1 to double-blind, free-combination treatment with linagliptin 5 mg once daily and metformin twice daily (uptitrated to 2000 mg/day maximum) or to linagliptin monotherapy. The primary endpoint was change in HbA1c concentration from baseline at week 24 (per-protocol completers' cohort: n = 245). RESULTS: The mean (standard deviation) age and HbA1c at baseline were 48.8 (11.0) years and 9.8 (1.1)%, respectively. At week 24, the mean ± standard error (s.e.) HbA1c decreased from baseline by -2.8 ± 0.1% with linagliptin/metformin and -2.0 ± 0.1% with linagliptin; a treatment difference of -0.8% (95% confidence interval -1.1 to -0.5; p <0.0001). Similar results were observed in a sensitivity analysis based on intent-to-treat principles: adjusted mean ± s.e. changes in HbA1c of -2.7 ± 0.1% and -1.8 ± 0.1%, respectively; treatment difference of -0.9% (95% CI -1.3 to -0.6; p <0.0001). A treatment response of HbA1c <7.0% was achieved by 61 and 40% of patients in the linagliptin/metformin and linagliptin groups, respectively. Few patients experienced drug-related adverse events (8.8 and 5.7% of patients in the linagliptin/metformin and linagliptin groups, respectively). Hypoglycaemia occurred in 1.9 and 3.2% of patients in the linagliptin/metformin and linagliptin groups, respectively (no severe episodes). Body weight decreased significantly with the combination therapy (-1.3 kg between-group difference; p =0.0033). CONCLUSIONS: Linagliptin in initial combination with metformin in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes and marked hyperglycaemia, an understudied group, elicited significant improvements in glycaemic control with a low incidence of hypoglycaemia, weight gain or other adverse effects. These results support early combination treatment strategies and suggest that newly diagnosed patients with marked hyperglycaemia may be effectively managed with oral, non-insulin therapy.

COVID-19 in people living with diabetes: An international consensus.

The COVID-19 pandemic has added an enormous toll to the existing challenge of diabetes care world-wide. A large proportion of patients with COVID-19 requiring hospitalization and/or succumbing to the disease have had diabetes and other chronic conditions as underlying risk factors. In particular, individuals belonging to racial/ethnic minorities in the U.S. and other countries have been significantly and disproportionately impacted. Multiple and complex socioeconomic factors have long played a role in increasing the risk for diabetes and now for COVID-19. Since the pandemic began, the global healthcare community has accumulated invaluable clinical experience on providing diabetes care in the setting of COVID-19. In addition, understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms that link these two diseases is being developed. The current clinical management of diabetes is a work in progress, requiring a shift in patient-provider interaction beyond the walls of clinics and hospitals: the use of tele-medicine when feasible, innovative patient education programs, strategies to ensure medication and glucose testing availability and affordability, as well as numerous ideas on how to improve meal plans and physical activity. Notably, this worldwide experience offers us the possibility to not only prepare better for future disasters but also transform diabetes care beyond the COVID-19 era.

Microvascular and macrovascular reactivity is reduced in subjects at risk for type 2 diabetes.

Abnormalities in vascular reactivity in the micro- and macrocirculation are well established in type 2 diabetes. However, little is known about changes in vascular reactivity in those at risk for developing type 2 diabetes. To address this situation, the vascular reactivity in both the micro- and macrocirculation was studied in four age and sex comparable groups: 30 healthy normoglycemic subjects with no history of type 2 diabetes in a first-degree relative (controls), 39 healthy normoglycemic subjects with a history of type 2 diabetes in one or both parents (relatives), 32 subjects with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), and 42 patients with type 2 diabetes without vascular complications (diabetes). Laser Doppler perfusion imaging was used to measure vasodilation in the forearm skin in response to iontophoresis of 1% acetylcholine chloride (Ach) (endothelium-dependent) and 1% sodium nitroprusside (SNP) (endothelium-independent), whereas high-resolution ultrasound images were used to measure brachial artery diameter changes during reactive hyperemia. Plasma concentrations of endothelin-1 (ET-1), von Willebrand factor (vWF), soluble intercellular adhesion molecule (sICAM), and soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule (sVCAM) were also measured as indicators of endothelial cell activation. The vasodilatory responses to Ach, expressed as percent increase of blood flow over baseline, were reduced in relatives (98 +/- 48, mean +/- SD), IGT (94 +/- 52), and diabetes (74 +/- 45) compared with controls (126 +/- 67) (P < 0.001 controls versus relatives, IGT, and diabetes). The responses to SNP were similarly reduced: controls (123 +/- 46), relatives (85 +/- 46), IGT (83 +/- 48), and diabetes (65 +/- 31) (P < 0.001 controls versus relatives, IGT, and diabetes) as were the responses in the brachial artery diameter during reactive hyperemia: controls (13.7 +/- 6.1), relatives (10.5 +/- 6.7), IGT (9.8 +/- 4.5), and diabetes (8.4 +/- 5.0) (P < 0.01 controls versus relatives, IGT, and diabetes). Women had greater responses than men in both the micro- and macrovascular circulatory tests, but a similar progressive reduction was observed in both sexes with increasing degrees of glucose intolerance. A significant inverse correlation was found between microvascular reactivity and systolic blood pressure, fasting plasma glucose, HDL cholesterol, fasting plasma insulin, and homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) values, an index of insulin resistance. BMI and diastolic blood pressure had a significant inverse correlation only with endothelium-dependent vasodilation. In the macrocirculation, systolic blood pressure, HbA1c, HDL cholesterol, and HOMA had significant correlation with brachial artery diameter changes. Compared with control subjects, ET-1 was significantly higher in all groups, vWF was higher only in the diabetic group, sICAM levels were higher in the IGT and diabetic groups, while sVCAM concentrations were higher in the relatives and those with diabetes (P < 0.05). On stepwise multivariate analysis, age, sex, fasting plasma glucose, and BMI were the most important contributing factors to the variation of vascular reactivity. Addition of all clinical and biochemical measures explained only 32-37% of the variation in vascular reactivity. These results suggest that abnormalities in vascular reactivity and biochemical markers of endothelial cell activation are present early in individuals at risk of developing type 2 diabetes, even at a stage when normal glucose tolerance exists, and that factors in addition to insulin resistance may be operative.

Soluble intercellular adhesion molecule, vascular cell adhesion molecule, and impaired microvascular reactivity are early markers of vasculopathy in type 2 diabetic individuals without microalbuminuria.

OBJECTIVE: Using von Willebrand Factor (vWF) as a marker of endothelial function, previous studies have shown that the development of microalbuminuria is associated with the onset of endothelial dysfunction in individuals with type 2 diabetes. We tested the hypothesis that endothelial dysfunction is already evident in normoalbuminuric individuals with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We used laser Doppler imaging scanning to measure vasodilation in the forearm skin in response to iontophoresis of 1% acetylcholine (endothelium-dependent) and 1% sodium nitroprusside (endothelium-independent). Multiple indicators of endothelial function--soluble intercellular adhesion molecule (sICAM), soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule (sVCAM), vWF, and microvascular reactivity--were measured in 20 healthy control subjects, 45 normoalbuminuric (urinary albumin/creatinine ratio < 30 micrograms/mg) individuals with type 2 diabetes, and 14 microalbuminuric (urinary albumin/creatinine ratio between 30 and 300 micrograms/mg) individuals with type 2 diabetes. RESULTS: Serum sICAM and sVCAM levels were elevated in the normoalbuminuric (305 +/- 120, 851 +/- 284 ng/ml) and microalbuminuric (300 +/- 89, 845 +/- 252 ng/ml) individuals with diabetes when compared with the healthy control subjects (213 +/- 58, 661 +/- 176 ng/ml) (P < 0.01). Furthermore, the microvascular endothelium-dependent and -independent vasodilation was reduced in the normoalbuminuric (76 +/- 44, 70 +/- 33) (percent increase in perfusion over baseline) and microalbuminuric (74 +/- 41, 73 +/- 28) individuals with diabetes compared with healthy control subjects (126 +/- 67, 120 +/- 47) (P < 0.05). In contrast, plasma vWF was elevated only in the microalbuminuric individuals with diabetes (129 +/- 35%) compared with the normoalbuminuric individuals with diabetes (110 +/- 34) and healthy control subjects (111.3 +/- 39) (P < 0.05). On stepwise multivariate analysis, fasting blood glucose was the most important contributing factor to the variation in microvascular reactivity and sVCAM, whereas insulin resistance (by homeostasis model assessment) was the most important contributing factor to the variation in sICAM. Addition of all clinical and biochemical measures explained only 15-22% of the variation in sICAM, sVCAM, and microvascular reactivity. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple markers of endothelial dysfunction were evident in normoalbuminuric individuals with type 2 diabetes. The pathogenic process of vasculopathy in type 2 diabetes occurs early and may be operative before the development of microalbuminuria.

The effect of hormonal replacement therapy on the vascular reactivity and endothelial function of healthy individuals and individuals with type 2 diabetes.

Estrogens protect healthy women from cardiovascular disease. However, epidemiological data suggest that women with diabetes are denied the cardioprotection associated with estrogens. Whether or not hormonal replacement therapy (HRT) confers cardiovascular benefits in postmenopausal women with diabetes is not known. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of HRT on the microvascular reactivity and endothelial function of individuals with and without diabetes. We studied the following groups of individuals: premenopausal healthy women [n = 28, age 41 +/- 8 yr (mean +/- SD)], premenopausal women with type 2 diabetes (n = 16, age 43 +/- 6 yr); postmenopausal healthy women (n = 12, age 57 +/- 4 yr), postmenopausal women with diabetes (n = 17, age 62 +/- 5 yr); postmenopausal healthy women on HRT (n = 13, age 51 +/- 5 yr), postmenopausal women with diabetes on HRT (n = 11, age 57 +/- 7 yr). We used laser Doppler flowmetry to measure forearm cutaneous vasodilatation in response to iontophoresis of 1% acetylcholine (endothelium dependent) and 1% sodium nitroprusside (endothelium independent). The endothelium-dependent vasodilation was significantly higher in premenopausal healthy women (180 +/- 67%; increase over baseline) compared to premenopausal diabetic women (87 +/- 41%; P < 0.001). endothelium-dependent vasodilation was also higher in postmenopausal healthy women on HRT (143 +/- 52) compared with postmenopausal diabetic women on HRT (86 +/- 61), postmenopausal healthy women without HRT (104 +/- 43), and postmenopausal diabetic women without HRT (74 +/- 28; P < 0.001). A similar pattern of responses was observed in the endothelium-independent vasodilation (premenopausal healthy women, 126 +/- 56; premenopausal diabetic women, 88 +/- 26; postmenopausal healthy women on HRT, 121 +/- 37; postmenopausal diabetic women on HRT, 88 +/- 41; postmenopausal healthy women without HRT, 84 +/- 36; and postmenopausal diabetic women without HRT, 73 +/- 36; P < 0.001). Soluble intercellular adhesion molecule (sICAM) was also measured among all the women with diabetes. Premenopausal women with diabetes (248.9 +/- 56 ng/ml) and postmenopausal women with diabetes on HRT (257.7 +/- 49 ng/ml) had lower sICAM levels compared with the postmenopausal diabetic women without HRT (346.4 +/- 149 ng/ml; P < 0.05). We conclude that menopausal status and type 2 diabetes are associated with impaired microvascular reactivity. HRT substantially improves microvascular reactivity in postmenopausal healthy women. In contrast, the effect of HRT on the microvascular reactivity of postmenopausal diabetic women is less apparent. However, the use of HRT among women with diabetes is associated with lower sICAM levels, suggesting an attenuation in endothelial activation.

Reactive hyperemic response of the brachial artery: comparison of proximal and distal occlusion.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The authors compared the postocclusion hyperemic responses of the brachial artery after occluding blood flow proximal to and distal to the studied area. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Response of the brachial artery to hypoxia was evaluated with duplex Doppler ultrasound in 13 healthy subjects. A pneumatic tourniquet was first positioned 2-5 cm superior to the left elbow, proximal to the area of artery studied. Two hours later the response was remeasured with the tourniquet positioned 2-5 cm inferior to the elbow, distal to the artery studied. Arterial diameter, mean and peak flow velocities, and heart rate were assessed. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed between measurements of baseline and postischemic arterial diameter, percentage diameter change, baseline mean arterial blood flow velocity, baseline peak arterial blood flow velocity, or postischemic heart rate obtained with proximal occlusion of the artery and those obtained with distal occlusion. In contrast, mean and peak postischemic arterial blood flow velocity and preocclusion heart rate were higher in measurements made during proximal artery occlusion. Significant correlation was found between measurements of percentage change in artery diameter obtained with proximal artery occlusion and those obtained with distal occlusion (r = 0.611, P < .05). CONCLUSION: There are no major differences in postischemic changes in brachial artery diameter related to reactive hyperemia between blood flow occlusion applied proximal and distal to the studied area. However, there are significant differences in the mean and peak systolic velocities. Either occlusion site can be used for clinical studies if arterial diameter change is monitored, but if velocity measurements are being compared, a single occlusion site should be chosen.