Sharps Disposal Practices Among People With Diabetes in a Community Care Clinic.

Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to determine sharps disposal practices among people with diabetes in a community care clinic. Secondary objectives were to identify patterns of sharps use and barriers to proper use. Methods: Surveys were distributed to patients at a community care clinic in person and via mail. Survey questions focused on how sharps are used and disposed of, the frequency of sharps changes, sharps disposal training, sharps identification, and confidence in sharps disposal. Participant demographics and diabetes profiles were also collected. Findings: Among 89 respondents, mean age was 60 years (range 29-93 years), 61.8% were Caucasian, 88.8% had type 2 diabetes, and 60.7% had had a diabetes diagnosis for ≤10 years, with diverse diabetes management methods; 57.3% did not receive or were unsure of sharps training, 25.8% discarded used sharps without a designated sharps container, and 37.1% properly disposed of sharps containers at sharps disposal facilities. Barriers to proper sharps practices included perceived safety of reusing sharps and waste with single use, cost, and the hassle of disposal. Those with prior sharps training were more likely to properly use and discard sharps; however, gaps in knowledge were still evident in this population. Conclusion: Results indicate gaps in proper sharps use and disposal knowledge among people with diabetes. Responses revealed sharps practices that are inconsistent with current federal and state regulations and are potentially dangerous for those handling improperly discarded sharps. Targeted sharps usage and disposal education resources are needed for individuals with and without prior sharps training.

Twelve-month supply of short-acting contraception methods: Pharmacists' perspectives on implementation of new state law.

BACKGROUND: Oral contraceptives and other short-acting reversible contraceptive (SARC) methods such as the patch, vaginal ring, and medroxyprogesterone injections are used by approximately 30% of people using contraception. People may face barriers in obtaining a timely and adequate supply of their SARCs. It is well established that dispensing more than 1-month supply at a time is more convenient for patients, improves continuation, and decreases the risk of unintended pregnancy. Given the potential for public health impact, 20 states, including Massachusetts, have expanded access to a 12-month supply of SARCs. OBJECTIVES: The goal of this qualitative study was to explore Massachusetts pharmacists' general awareness and specific knowledge of the state's 2017 Act Advancing Contraceptive Coverage and Economic Security in Our State (ACCESS) law, explore barriers to the implementation of the law, and elicit recommendations to improve uptake of this practice. METHODS: Semistructured interviews were conducted with a purposeful sample of community pharmacists in Massachusetts between September 2020 and May 2021 using a pretested interview guide. Interviews were audio recorded and professionally transcribed. Data collection ceased when theoretical saturation was achieved. Data were analyzed using modified grounded theory, including code book development and line-by-line and axial coding. RESULTS: Sixteen pharmacists from diverse practice settings participated in the interviews. All the pharmacists (100%) reported that they had received no training on the ACCESS law, and only 1 pharmacist reported having complete knowledge of the specifics of the law. We identified key themes and subthemes related to pharmacists' concerns about implementation of the law at the system, pharmacy, and patient level, including insurance coverage, communication of new laws, stocking, supply, and misuse by patients. CONCLUSION: Addressing the need for pharmacist training and communication regarding new regulations may improve provision of an extended supply of SARC methods.

Effect of Pharmacist-Led Interventions on Diabetes Distress Among People With Type 2 Diabetes.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of pharmacist-led interventions on diabetes distress and glucose management among people with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) in a community care clinic. METHODS: Adults with T2DM were recruited during routine visits at the pharmacist-run clinic. Participants completed a baseline A1C, demographic survey, Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS), and Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2). Depending on DDS subscale-specific responses, participants qualified for pharmacist-led educational interventions based on the ADCES7 Self-Care Behaviors™. After 6 months, participants completed another A1C, satisfaction survey, DDS, and PHQ-2. Data analysis included descriptive statistics and paired t tests. RESULTS: Among 53 participants at baseline, diabetes distress was present in 77.4%; emotional burden was most common in 64.2%, followed by regimen distress in 45.3%, interpersonal distress in 34.0%, and physician distress in 20.8%. After the intervention, significant reductions occurred in mean overall DDS score (2.0 to 1.7), emotional burden (2.4 to 1.8), regimen distress (2.3 to 1.7), A1C (7.0% to 6.5%; 53.0 to 47.5 mmol/mol), and PHQ-2 score (1.6 to 1.0). Participants were highly satisfied with the service, their knowledge, and self-management skills following completion of the study. CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes distress was present in most participants despite glucose management that was largely achieving treatment goals. Pharmacist-led educational interventions significantly reduced overall DDS score, emotional burden, regimen distress, A1C, and PHQ-2 score. The results of this study suggest that people with T2DM should receive routine screening for diabetes distress and that pharmacists can positively affect diabetes management and emotional well-being through tailored education.

Online survey of consumer awareness and perceptions of a Massachusetts law for 12-month supply of contraception.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to characterize awareness of a 2017 Massachusetts (MA) law that ensures access to a 12-month supply of short-acting contraceptive methods (e.g., pill, patch, and vaginal ring) among short-acting contraceptive users in MA and to identify perceived benefits and concerns of a 12-month supply. STUDY DESIGN: An online survey was administered to a Qualtrics panel of MA women who were using short-acting contraceptive methods and were insured by an eligible health plan. The survey's primary outcome was general awareness of the law; interest in, receipt of, and perceived benefits and risks of a 12-month supply were also elicited. Analysis included descriptive statistics and bivariate and multivariable analyses examining factors associated with awareness of the law. RESULTS: Among the 207 survey respondents, 76% were aware of the law, and 93% expressed interest in receiving a 12-month supply of a short-acting method; however, only 9% received it. Respondents identified as White (66%), privately insured (59%), and pill users (44%). Concerns about a 12-month supply included privacy, product expiration, and change in personal medical status. Perceived benefits included avoiding multiple trips to pharmacy and increased compliance. Multivariable analyses showed general awareness of the law was only associated with employer-based insurance, with those respondents having 75% lower odds of being aware of the law than respondents with Medicaid coverage. CONCLUSION: Although a high percentage of women surveyed were aware of the law and most were interested in receiving a 12-month supply of their short-acting method, the low percentage who have received a 12-month supply suggests barriers to policy uptake. IMPLICATIONS: This study describes perceptions of the 12-month supply provision of the contraception Act Advancing Contraceptive Coverage and Economic Security in our State law. Addressing consumer concerns may be important to improve the implementation and dissemination of this state policy change.

Non-invasive ways of administering insulin.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Insulin is crucial in the management of diabetes. However, requires injection which itself comes with some challenges. Alternative delivery routes have been investigated that are needle-free, with enhanced absorption and bioavailability. This review presents novel non-invasive insulin administration approaches that overcome some hurdles, as well as delineating their advantages and disadvantages. METHODS: Information was primarily gathered by employing various PubMed scholarly articles for real-world examples in addition to data extraction from supplementary manuscripts. Articles were evaluated between 1958 and 2022. An introductive approach was used to identify matters related to the concept of different ways of administering insulin. RESULTS: Approaches aim to administer insulin in a safe, stable, and easy to use form, whether via oral, buccal, intranasal, oral inhalation, transdermal, ocular, rectal, or vaginal routes. Some have been shown to clinically improve blood glucose levels, while others are still in the investigational stage. CONCLUSION: Many approaches have been taken in an attempt to overcome physical barriers of insulin delivery. Some of these systems discussed may reach the market in the future and assist the millions of people who currently take subcutaneous injections of insulin.

Community pharmacists' interventions and documentation during medication therapy management encounters delivered face-to-face versus via telephone: The devil is in the details.

BACKGROUND: To date, no studies are available comparing in-person versus telephone-administered medication therapy management (MTM) encounters in a community pharmacy setting with respect to medication-related problems, interventions and documentation. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate types of medication-related problems, interventions, and documentation among patients receiving MTM face-to-face versus over the telephone. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on all completed comprehensive medication reviews (CMR) between 2011 and 2017 in 14 community pharmacies in Western Massachusetts, USA that belong to one district of a national chain. Medication-related problems were classified as: Beers criteria medications, untreated condition, dose too high or low, medication omission, duplicate therapy, drug-drug interaction, non-adherence, complicated dosing. Pharmacist's interventions were classified as education, medication reconciliation, and vaccination. Documentation of assessment, plan, discussion notes, and recommendations were evaluated as being present or absent. RESULTS: In total, 297 encounters (56.5% were over the telephone) were included in the analysis. There was no significant differences between clinical and demographic characteristics and types of medication-related problems and pharmacist interventions among patients who received face-to-face versus telephone MTM service. Assessment was documented among 28% of face-to-face and 42% of telephone CMR encounters (p < 0.05). Plan was documented among 27% of face-to-face and 40% of telephone CMR encounters (p < 0.05). Discussion notes were documented among 97% of face-to-face and 98% of telephone CMR encounters (p > 0.05). Pharmacist recommendations were documented among 92% of face-to-face and 95% of telephone CMR encounters (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacists identify medication-related problems and provide education and medication reconciliation interventions independent of the mode of delivery. The overall low frequency of assessment and plan documentation raises concerns. It is imperative for pharmacists to document both instances of provider outreach and follow-up to ascertain resolutions of patients' medication-related problems.

Carbonation dysgeusia associated with topiramate.

PURPOSE: A case of carbonation dysgeusia associated with the use of topiramate is reported in order to bring awareness to a lesser-known adverse effect of the medication so that providers may be able to more effectively counsel patients and provide potential solutions. SUMMARY: A 39-year-old Caucasian woman with longstanding epilepsy was initiated on topiramate therapy after experiencing a generalized seizure (she reported not taking any antiepileptic medication for years). Topiramate was started at a dosage of 25 mg by mouth twice daily and after 3 weeks titrated to a dosage of 100 mg by mouth twice daily for maintenance therapy. After initiation of topiramate therapy, the patient began to experience an immediate change in her carbonation perception when drinking carbonated beverages; all carbonated beverages, including seltzer and beer, tasted "flat." The patient remained on topiramate for the subsequent 12 months without her carbonation perception returning to normal but noted that drinking carbonated beverages through straws slightly mitigated the adverse effect. Case assessment using the adverse drug reaction probability scale of Naranjo et al indicated that topiramate was the probable cause of the patient's carbonation taste perversion. CONCLUSION: A 39-year-old Caucasian woman developed chronic carbonation dysgeusia after initiation of topiramate following a generalized seizure.

Medication taking and diabetes: a systematic review of the literature.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate the evidence of the challenges and barriers to medication taking (adherence) and to summarize the interventions that improve medication taking in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: PubMed, the Cochrane Collaborative, and the Health and Psychosocial Instruments databases were used to obtain articles identified by using the MeSH headings of diabetes, medication, oral hypoglycemic agents, oral antihyperglycemic agents, oral antidiabetic agents, insulin, adherence, medication taking, compliance, fears, treatment, and electronic monitoring. Only articles published in English between 1990 and May 7, 2007, and including individuals of all ages with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus were included. Retrospective and prospective studies reporting adherence to medications using self-report, pill counts, medication possession ratios, and electronic monitoring devices were included. Database analyses of prescription records from various organizations or countries were included only if adherence to pharmacologic therapy was stated. Surveys and questionnaires assessing medication taking were also included. The data from the selected literature was abstracted independently. The various studies were grouped together based on the type of study conducted. Studies were not included if a specific measure of adherence to medication was not used or stated. The studies are presented in 3 tables according to design. CONCLUSIONS: Several barriers to medication taking have been suggested for those with diabetes mellitus, although well-controlled trials to confirm and resolve these barriers are limited. Diabetes educators should be aware of the common barriers to medication taking (regimen complexity of more than 1 diabetes mellitus drug or more than 1 dose daily, depression, and remembering doses and refills) and provide screening and support to their patients to resolve barriers if they exist. Further studies are needed to test specific interventions to improve medication taking in diabetes.

Medication Adherence With Diabetes Medication: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

PURPOSE: The primary purpose of this systematic review is to synthesize the evidence regarding risk factors associated with nonadherence to prescribed glucose-lowering agents, the impact of nonadherence on glycemic control and the economics of diabetes care, and the interventions designed to improve adherence. METHODS: Medline, EMBASE, the Cochrane Collaborative, BIOSIS, and the Health and Psychosocial Instruments databases were searched for studies of medication adherence for the period from May 2007 to December 2014. Inclusion criteria were study design and primary outcome measuring or characterizing adherence. Published evidence was graded according to the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists protocol for standardized production of clinical practice guidelines. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-six published articles were reviewed; 98 met inclusion criteria. Factors including age, race, health beliefs, medication cost, co-pays, Medicare Part D coverage gap, insulin use, health literacy, primary nonadherence, and early nonpersistence significantly affect adherence. Higher adherence was associated with improved glycemic control, fewer emergency department visits, decreased hospitalizations, and lower medical costs. Adherence was lower when medications were not tolerated or were taken more than twice daily, with concomitant depression, and with skepticism about the importance of medication. Intervention trials show the use of phone interventions, integrative health coaching, case managers, pharmacists, education, and point-of-care testing improve adherence. CONCLUSION: Medication adherence remains an important consideration in diabetes care. Health professionals working with individuals with diabetes (eg, diabetes educators) are in a key position to assess risks for nonadherence, to develop strategies to facilitate medication taking, and to provide ongoing support and assessment of adherence at each visit.

Randomized trial of pharmacist interventions to improve depression care and outcomes in primary care.

PURPOSE: The impact of pharmacist interventions on the care and outcomes of patients with depression in a primary care setting was evaluated. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with a new episode of depression and started on anti-depressant medications were randomized to enhanced care (EC) or usual care (UC) for one year. EC consisted of a pharmacist collaborating with primary care providers to facilitate patient education, the initiation and adjustment of antidepressant dosages, the monitoring of patient adherence to the regimen, the management of adverse reactions, and the prevention of relapse. The patients in the UC group served as controls. Outcomes were measured by the Hopkins Symptom Checklist, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, criteria for major depression, health-related quality of life, medication adherence, patient satisfaction, and use of depression-related health care services. An intent-to-treat analysis was used. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients were randomized to EC or UC. At baseline, the EC group included more patients diagnosed with major depression than did the UC group (p = 0.04). All analyses were adjusted for this difference. In both groups, mean scores significantly improved from baseline for symptoms of depression and quality of life at three months and were maintained for one year. There were no statistically significant differences between treatment groups in depression symptoms, quality of life, medication adherence, provider visits, or patient satisfaction. CONCLUSION: Frequent telephone contacts and interventions by pharmacists and UC in a primary care setting resulted in similar rates of adherence to antidepressant regimens and improvements in the outcomes of depression at one year.

Inhaled insulin: Exubera.

OBJECTIVE: To review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of Exubera, a novel, dry-powder formulation of insulin for inhalation, and describe patient satisfaction and quality-of-life data. DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE search (1966-November 2004) was conducted using the key words inhaled insulin and Exubera for clinical trials limited to human research published in English. BIOSIS Previews and the American Diabetes Association Scientific Abstracts were used for published abstract information. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: All available human studies of Exubera were selected for review. References of identified articles were used for additional citations. DATA SYNTHESIS: Exubera is a rapid-acting insulin administered by oral inhalation before meals with long-acting insulin administered subcutaneously once or twice daily for type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus. Exubera provides similar efficacy and improved patient satisfaction compared with standard subcutaneous insulin therapy (ie, NPH twice daily with regular insulin before meals). Efficacy has also been demonstrated for Exubera when used as adjunctive therapy with oral medications for type 2 diabetes. The onset of Exubera is more rapid and its duration of action is similar to that of regular insulin. To date, Exubera administered before meals with a once-daily long-acting subcutaneous insulin (usually Ultralente) has been compared with standard subcutaneous NPH/regular insulin regimens. Comparison of premeal Exubera plus a basal long-acting insulin analog (eg, glargine) with a regimen of premeal subcutaneous rapid-acting insulin analog (eg, lispro or aspart) plus a basal long-acting insulin analog (eg, glargine) is needed to fully evaluate Exubera. Pulmonary safety appears to be maintained for up to 4 years, although there are no data, as of this writing, on the use of this agent in patients with pulmonary conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Exubera is an effective inhaled insulin for preprandial use in type 1 or 2 diabetes. Improved patient satisfaction over injected insulin increases its potential for use earlier in the treatment of type 2 diabetes.

Collaborative care model to improve outcomes in major depression.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a pharmacist intervention to improve depression care and outcomes within a primary care setting. METHODS: Pragmatic, randomized trial of a clinical pharmacist collaborative care intervention versus usual care in a busy, academic family practice clinic. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients diagnosed with a new episode of major depression and started on antidepressant medications were randomized to enhanced care (EC) or usual care (UC) groups. EC consists of a clinical pharmacist collaborating with primary care providers (PCPs) to facilitate education, initiation, and titration of acute-phase antidepressant treatment to monitor treatment adherence and to prevent relapse. Control patients receive UC by their PCP. The main end point is reduction of depression symptoms over time as measured by the Hopkins Symptom Checklist (SCL-20). Other outcomes include the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, (DSM-IV) criteria for major depression, health-related quality of life measured by the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 12 (SF-12), medication adherence, patient satisfaction, and healthcare utilization. The main end point and the cost of treating major depression will be used to estimate the cost-effectiveness of the collaborative care model. CONCLUSIONS: The study is a unique, ongoing trial that may have important implications for the treatment of depression in primary care settings as well as new roles for clinical pharmacists.