Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 157
Filtrar
1.
Mol Psychiatry ; 29(8): 2287-2295, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38454079

RESUMEN

Further research is needed to help improve both the standard of care and the outcome for patients with treatment-resistant depression. A particularly critical evidence gap exists with respect to whether pharmacological or non-pharmacological augmentation is superior to antidepressant switch, or vice-versa. The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of augmentation with aripiprazole or repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation versus switching to the antidepressant venlafaxine XR (or duloxetine for those not eligible to receive venlafaxine) for treatment-resistant depression. In this multi-site, 8-week, randomized, open-label study, 278 subjects (196 females and 82 males, mean age 45.6 years (SD 15.3)) with treatment-resistant depression were assigned in a 1:1:1 fashion to treatment with either of these three interventions; 235 subjects completed the study. 260 randomized subjects with at least one post-baseline Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating (MADRS) assessment were included in the analysis. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (score change (standard error (se)) = -17.39 (1.3) (p = 0.015) but not aripiprazole augmentation (score change (se) = -14.9 (1.1) (p = 0.069) was superior to switch (score change (se) = -13.22 (1.1)) on the MADRS. Aripiprazole (mean change (se) = -37.79 (2.9) (p = 0.003) but not repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation augmentation (mean change (se) = -42.96 (3.6) (p = 0.031) was superior to switch (mean change (se) = -34.45 (3.0)) on the symptoms of depression questionnaire. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation augmentation was shown to be more effective than switching antidepressants in treatment-resistant depression on the study primary measure. In light of these findings, clinicians should consider repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation augmentation early-on for treatment-resistant depression.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02977299.


Asunto(s)
Antidepresivos , Aripiprazol , Trastorno Depresivo Resistente al Tratamiento , Estimulación Magnética Transcraneal , Clorhidrato de Venlafaxina , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastorno Depresivo Resistente al Tratamiento/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastorno Depresivo Resistente al Tratamiento/terapia , Clorhidrato de Venlafaxina/uso terapéutico , Estimulación Magnética Transcraneal/métodos , Adulto , Aripiprazol/uso terapéutico , Aripiprazol/farmacología , Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Clorhidrato de Duloxetina/uso terapéutico , Investigación sobre la Eficacia Comparativa , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Terapia Combinada/métodos
2.
N Engl J Med ; 384(2): 140-153, 2021 01 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33497547

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The use of naltrexone plus bupropion to treat methamphetamine use disorder has not been well studied. METHODS: We conducted this multisite, double-blind, two-stage, placebo-controlled trial with the use of a sequential parallel comparison design to evaluate the efficacy and safety of extended-release injectable naltrexone (380 mg every 3 weeks) plus oral extended-release bupropion (450 mg per day) in adults with moderate or severe methamphetamine use disorder. In the first stage of the trial, participants were randomly assigned in a 0.26:0.74 ratio to receive naltrexone-bupropion or matching injectable and oral placebo for 6 weeks. Those in the placebo group who did not have a response in stage 1 underwent rerandomization in stage 2 and were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive naltrexone-bupropion or placebo for an additional 6 weeks. Urine samples were obtained from participants twice weekly. The primary outcome was a response, defined as at least three methamphetamine-negative urine samples out of four samples obtained at the end of stage 1 or stage 2, and the weighted average of the responses in the two stages is reported. The treatment effect was defined as the between-group difference in the overall weighted responses. RESULTS: A total of 403 participants were enrolled in stage 1, and 225 in stage 2. In the first stage, 18 of 109 participants (16.5%) in the naltrexone-bupropion group and 10 of 294 (3.4%) in the placebo group had a response. In the second stage, 13 of 114 (11.4%) in the naltrexone-bupropion group and 2 of 111 (1.8%) in the placebo group had a response. The weighted average response across the two stages was 13.6% with naltrexone-bupropion and 2.5% with placebo, for an overall treatment effect of 11.1 percentage points (Wald z-test statistic, 4.53; P<0.001). Adverse events with naltrexone-bupropion included gastrointestinal disorders, tremor, malaise, hyperhidrosis, and anorexia. Serious adverse events occurred in 8 of 223 participants (3.6%) who received naltrexone-bupropion during the trial. CONCLUSIONS: Among adults with methamphetamine use disorder, the response over a period of 12 weeks among participants who received extended-release injectable naltrexone plus oral extended-release bupropion was low but was higher than that among participants who received placebo. (Funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse and others; ADAPT-2 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03078075.).


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Relacionados con Anfetaminas/tratamiento farmacológico , Bupropión/administración & dosificación , Metanfetamina , Naltrexona/administración & dosificación , Administración Oral , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Bupropión/efectos adversos , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada , Método Doble Ciego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Inyecciones , Masculino , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Metanfetamina/orina , Persona de Mediana Edad , Naltrexona/efectos adversos , Antagonistas de Narcóticos , Adulto Joven
3.
J Behav Med ; 2024 Sep 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39306632

RESUMEN

Multiple intervention strategies have been found effective for increasing physical activity among breast cancer survivors, yet most breast cancer survivors fail to meet physical activity recommendations. Optimization of interventions can facilitate real word implementation to ensure effective and efficient intervention delivery. Using a full-factorial design based on the Multiphase Optimization Strategy, 337 breast cancer survivors were randomized to receive a combination of four intervention components: (1) supervised exercise sessions, (2) facility membership, (3) Active Living Every Day (ALED), and (4) Fitbit. Moderate-to vigorous (MVPA) and light-intensity physical activity (LPA) were measured at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months with a hip-worn Actigraph GT3X+. Normal linear mixed models with separate intercepts for each subject were fit in the SAS 9.4 Mixed procedure. Participants who received supervised exercise sessions engaged in more MVPA, 153.58 min/week vs. 133.0 min/week (F = 3.97, p = 0.048) and LPA, 170.26 min/day versus 160.98 light PA minutes/day (F = 4.67, p = 0.032), compared to participants who did not receive supervised exercise. The effects of the three other intervention components on MVPA were not significant; however, those that received ALED engaged in less LPA (F = 6.6, p = 0.011). Supervised exercise sessions resulted in significant increases in MVPA and LPA in a sample of breast cancer survivors. Of note, these sessions were provided only during the first 6 weeks of the intervention and effects remained significant at 6 months. Results of this trial could inform future implementation efforts to ensure effective and efficient delivery of physical activity programs for breast cancer survivors.

4.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act ; 20(1): 47, 2023 04 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37081460

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Depressive symptoms result in considerable burden for breast cancer survivors. Increased physical activity may reduce these burdens but existing evidence from physical activity interventions in equivocal. Furthermore, physical activity intervention strategies may differentially impact depressive symptoms, which should be considered in designing and optimizing behavioral interventions for breast cancer survivors. METHODS: The Physical Activity for Cancer Survivors (PACES) trial enrolled 336 participants breast cancer survivors, who were 3 months to 10 years post-treatment, and insufficiently active (< 150 min of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity per week). Participants were randomly assigned to a combination of 4 intervention strategies in a full-factorial design: 1) supervised exercise sessions, 2) facility access, 3) Active Living Every Day, and 4) Fitbit self-monitoring. Depressive symptoms were assessed at baseline, mid-intervention (3 months), and post-intervention (6 months) using the Quick Inventory for Depressive Symptoms. Change in depressive symptoms were analyzed using a linear mixed-effects model. RESULTS: Results from the linear mixed-effects model indicated that depressive symptoms decreased significantly across the entire study sample over the 6-month intervention (F = 4.09, p = 0.044). A significant ALED x time interaction indicated participants who received the ALED intervention experienced greater reductions in depressive symptoms (F = 5.29, p = 0.022). No other intervention strategy significantly impacted depressive symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The ALED intervention consists of strategies (i.e., goal setting, social support) that may have a beneficial impact on depressive symptoms above and beyond the effect of increased physical activity. Our findings highlight the need to consider secondary outcomes when designing and optimizing physical activity interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03060941. Posted February 23, 2017.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Supervivientes de Cáncer , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Ejercicio Físico , Depresión/terapia , Sobrevivientes , Calidad de Vida
5.
Psychol Med ; 52(13): 2441-2449, 2022 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33213541

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD) is imprecise and often involves trial-and-error to determine the most effective approach. To facilitate optimal treatment selection and inform timely adjustment, the current study investigated whether neurocognitive variables could predict an antidepressant response in a treatment-specific manner. METHODS: In the two-stage Establishing Moderators and Biosignatures of Antidepressant Response for Clinical Care (EMBARC) trial, outpatients with non-psychotic recurrent MDD were first randomized to an 8-week course of sertraline selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor or placebo. Behavioral measures of reward responsiveness, cognitive control, verbal fluency, psychomotor, and cognitive processing speeds were collected at baseline and week 1. Treatment responders then continued on another 8-week course of the same medication, whereas non-responders to sertraline or placebo were crossed-over under double-blinded conditions to bupropion noradrenaline/dopamine reuptake inhibitor or sertraline, respectively. Hamilton Rating for Depression scores were also assessed at baseline, weeks 8, and 16. RESULTS: Greater improvements in psychomotor and cognitive processing speeds within the first week, as well as better pretreatment performance in these domains, were specifically associated with higher likelihood of response to placebo. Moreover, better reward responsiveness, poorer cognitive control and greater verbal fluency were associated with greater likelihood of response to bupropion in patients who previously failed to respond to sertraline. CONCLUSION: These exploratory results warrant further scrutiny, but demonstrate that quick and non-invasive behavioral tests may have substantial clinical value in predicting antidepressant treatment response.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Sertralina , Humanos , Sertralina/uso terapéutico , Bupropión/uso terapéutico , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/psicología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Método Doble Ciego , Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico
6.
Mol Psychiatry ; 25(7): 1500-1510, 2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31388104

RESUMEN

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a serious, heterogeneous disorder accompanied by brain-related changes, many of which are still to be discovered or refined. Arterial spin labeling (ASL) is a neuroimaging technique used to measure cerebral blood flow (CBF; perfusion) to understand brain function and detect differences among groups. CBF differences have been detected in MDD, and may reveal biosignatures of disease-state. The current work aimed to discover and replicate differences in CBF between MDD participants and healthy controls (HC) as part of the EMBARC study. Participants underwent neuroimaging at baseline, prior to starting study medication, to investigate biosignatures in MDD. Relative CBF (rCBF) was calculated and compared between 106 MDD and 36 HC EMBARC participants (whole-brain Discovery); and 58 MDD EMBARC participants and 58 HC from the DLBS study (region-of-interest Replication). Both analyses revealed reduced rCBF in the right parahippocampus, thalamus, fusiform and middle temporal gyri, as well as the left and right insula, for those with MDD relative to HC. Both samples also revealed increased rCBF in MDD relative to HC in both the left and right inferior parietal lobule, including the supramarginal and angular gyri. Cingulate and prefrontal regions did not fully replicate. Lastly, significant associations were detected between rCBF in replicated regions and clinical measures of MDD chronicity. These results (1) provide reliable evidence for ASL in detecting differences in perfusion for multiple brain regions thought to be important in MDD, and (2) highlight the potential role of using perfusion as a biosignature of MDD.


Asunto(s)
Encéfalo/irrigación sanguínea , Circulación Cerebrovascular , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/fisiopatología , Adulto , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagen , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Neuroimagen , Marcadores de Spin
7.
Depress Anxiety ; 37(8): 771-783, 2020 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32187776

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Heterogeneity in major depressive disorder (MDD) is well recognized but not well understood. Core depressive features are reward and emotional symptoms, which reflect dysfunctions in the positive valence (PV) and negative valence (NV) systems, respectively. This study assessed whether PV and NV systems (based on selected symptoms) were associated with different clinical features, antidepressant response, and levels of immunomarkers in adults with MDD. METHODS: These analyses used data from combining medications to enhance depression outcomes study (N = 665; n = 166 for immunomarkers). PV and NV symptom scores were extracted from the clinician-rated 30-item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology. Correlational analyses were conducted. RESULTS: PV and NV symptom scores were substantially associated with different clinical features. PV symptoms (impaired motivation, impaired energy, and anhedonia) were independently associated with female gender (p < .001), older age (p = .012), and higher cognitive and physical impairment (p < .001) according to the 7-item Cognitive and Physical Functioning Questionnaire. Conversely, NV symptoms (anxiety and interpersonal sensitivity) were independently associated with younger age (p = .013), more anxious comorbidities (p = .001 for generalized anxiety disorder and p = .002 for social phobia) and other commonly associated noncriterion symptoms (p < .001). Overall, PV symptoms were more responsive to antidepressants than NV symptoms (p < .0001; Cohen's d = .455). A PV symptom score was positively correlated with the concentration of three proinflammatory and one anti-inflammatory factor. In contrast, an NV symptom score was negatively associated with only one proinflammatory immunomarker. CONCLUSIONS: PV and NV system functions appear to be reflected in selected clinical symptoms that differentially relate to other clinical features, treatment outcomes, and immunological function.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Adulto , Anciano , Anhedonia , Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Trastornos de Ansiedad/tratamiento farmacológico , Depresión , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Humanos
8.
Am J Nephrol ; 50(1): 37-47, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31167183

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Fatigue, although common and associated with outcomes in dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (CKD), has not been studied in nondialysis chronic kidney disease (CKD-ND) patients. METHODS: In this longitudinal cohort of 266 outpatients with CKD-ND stages 2-5, we measured self-reported fatigue on 3 scales-Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomatology-Self Report (QIDS-SR16), Beck Depression Inventory-I (BDI-I), and short form 12 health survey (SF-12) questionnaires and evaluated the prespecified composite of progression to dialysis initiation, death, or hospitalization after 12 months. Logistic and linear regression assessed characteristics associated with fatigue. Survival analysis measured associations of fatigue with outcomes. RESULTS: Mean age was 64.4 ± 12.0 years, and mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 31.6 ± 16.7 mL/min/1.73 m2. Fatigue was common, with 69.2% reporting fatigue on QIDS-SR16 and 77.7% on BDI-I. Unemployment, comorbidities, use of antidepressant medications, and lower hemoglobin correlated with fatigue. There were 126 outcome events. Participants that reported any versus no fatigue on QIDS-SR16 were more likely to reach the composite, hazard ratio (HR) 1.70 (95% CI 1.11-2.59), which persisted after adjusting for demographics, comorbidities, substance abuse, hemoglobin, albumin, eGFR, and calcium-phosphorus product, HR 1.63 (1.05-2.55). Fatigue severity by the SF-12 was also associated with outcomes independent of demographics, comorbidities, and substance abuse, HR per unit increase 1.18 (1.03-1.35). No association was observed with fatigue on the BDI-I. CONCLUSION: Fatigue affected about 2/3 of CKD-ND patients and associated with unemployment, comorbidities, antidepressant medication use, and anemia. Fatigue measured by the QIDS-SR16 and SF-12 independently predicted outcomes in CKD patients. Eliciting the presence of fatigue may be a clinically significant prognostic assessment in CKD patients.


Asunto(s)
Fatiga/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/mortalidad , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Fatiga/diagnóstico , Fatiga/etiología , Femenino , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/complicaciones , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/diagnóstico , Autoinforme/estadística & datos numéricos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Análisis de Supervivencia
9.
Depress Anxiety ; 36(4): 313-320, 2019 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30370613

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The 12-item Concise Health Risk Tracking Self-Report (CHRT-SR12 ) is a brief, self-report measure that systematically assesses both suicidal thinking and associated thoughts that may indicate the propensity for suicidal acts. It can be used as a tool to both assess risk and guide treatment interventions targeting associated cognitions. METHODS: This report used acute treatment data from a clinically representative sample of outpatients with nonpsychotic major depressive disorder (N = 665) participating in the Combining Medications to Enhance Depression Outcomes trial, who received up to 12 weeks of escitalopram, escitalopram plus bupropion SR, or venlafaxine XR plus mirtazapine. Outcome assessors and patients were masked to treatment. RESULTS: Factor analysis of CHRT-SR12 confirmed that the 12 items have higher order structure with two subscales (Propensity, Suicidal Thoughts) and a total score. Internal consistencies were acceptable for both subscales and total score. All three scales were modestly correlated with overall depression severity (r = 0.54 to r = 0.21) and highly discriminating among patients grouped by suicide item ratings on three different depressive symptom ratings. The three scales also distinguished change over the acute phase treatment for those with different levels of baseline suicidal ideation (measured by 30-item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (item 18) and for those with change in suicidal ideation (baseline to last visit). CONCLUSIONS: The CHRT-SR12 has good to excellent psychometric properties and is sensitive to change in suicidal thinking and propensity toward suicidal behavior in outpatients with major depressive disorder. It allows for the monitoring of thoughts and feelings associated with increased suicidal risk as well as levels of thoughts about suicide.


Asunto(s)
Depresión/psicología , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/psicología , Autoinforme , Ideación Suicida , Adulto , Anciano , Bupropión/uso terapéutico , Citalopram/uso terapéutico , Depresión/diagnóstico , Depresión/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/diagnóstico , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/tratamiento farmacológico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Análisis Factorial , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mirtazapina/uso terapéutico , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Psicometría , Medición de Riesgo , Método Simple Ciego , Clorhidrato de Venlafaxina/uso terapéutico
10.
BMC Cancer ; 18(1): 744, 2018 Jul 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30021554

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Despite the significant, empirically supported benefits of physical activity, the majority of breast cancer survivors do not meet recommended guidelines for physical activity. A variety of effective strategies to increase physical activity in breast cancer survivors have been identified. However, it is unknown which of these strategies is most effective or how these strategies might be combined to optimize intervention effectiveness. METHODS: The proposed trial uses multiphase optimization strategy (MOST) to evaluate four evidence-based intervention strategies for increasing physical activity in breast cancer survivors. We will enroll 500 breast cancer survivors, age 18 and older, who are 3-months to 5 years post-treatment. Using a full-factorial design, participants will be randomized to receive a combination: 1) supervised exercise, 2) facility access, 3) self-monitoring, and 4) group-based active living counseling. The primary outcome, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) will be measured at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months using an Actigraph GT3X+. To evaluate intervention effects, a linear mixed-effects model will be conducted with MVPA as the outcome and with time (3 months and 6 months) as the within-subjects factor and intervention (i.e., supervised exercise, facility access, self-monitoring, and active living counseling) as the between subjects factor, along with all two-way interactions. DISCUSSION: The purpose of the PACES study is to evaluate multiple strategies for increasing physical activity in breast cancer survivors. Results of this study will provide in an optimized intervention for increasing physical activity in breast cancer survivors. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03060941 . Registered February 23, 2017.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/psicología , Supervivientes de Cáncer/psicología , Ejercicio Físico , Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Consejo , Femenino , Humanos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Educación y Entrenamiento Físico
11.
JAMA ; 318(19): 1876-1890, 2017 11 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29101402

RESUMEN

Importance: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is prevalent among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and is associated with morbidity and mortality. The efficacy and adverse events of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in these patients are unknown. Objective: To determine whether treatment with sertraline improves depressive symptoms in patients with CKD and MDD. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Chronic Kidney Disease Antidepressant Sertraline Trial (CAST) was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial involving 201 patients with stage 3, 4, or 5 non-dialysis-dependent CKD, who were enrolled at 3 US medical centers. The Mini Neuropsychiatric Interview was used to establish MDD. The first participant was randomized in March 2010 and the last clinic visit occurred in November 2016. Interventions: After a 1-week placebo run-in, participants were randomized to sertraline (n = 102) for 12 weeks at an initial dose of 50 mg/d (escalated to a maximum dose of 200 mg/d based on tolerability and response) or matching placebo (n = 99). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was improvement in depressive symptom severity from baseline to 12 weeks determined by the 16-item Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomatology-Clinician Rated (QIDS-C16) (score range, 0-27; minimal clinically important difference, 2 points). Secondary outcomes included improvement in quality of life (Kidney Disease Quality of Life Survey-Short Form; score range, 0-100; higher scores indicate more favorable quality of life) and adverse events. Results: There were 201 patients (mean [SD] age, 58.2 [13.2] years; 27% female) randomized. The primary analysis included 193 patients who had at least 1 outcome assessment after randomization. The mean (SD) baseline QIDS-C16 score was 14.0 (2.4) in the sertraline group (n = 97) and 14.1 (2.4) in the placebo group (n = 96). The median participation time was 12.0 weeks and the median achieved dose was 150 mg/d, which was not significantly different between the groups. The QIDS-C16 score changed by -4.1 in the sertraline group and by -4.2 in the placebo group (between-group difference, 0.1 [95% CI, -1.1 to 1.3]; P = .82). There was no significant between-group difference in change in patient-reported overall health on the Kidney Disease Quality of Life Survey (median score, 0 in the sertraline group vs 0 in the placebo group; between-group difference, 0 [95% CI, -10.0 to 0]; P = .61). Nausea or vomiting occurred more frequently in the sertraline vs placebo group (22.7% vs 10.4%, respectively; between-group difference, 12.3% [95% CI, 1.9% to 22.6%], P = .03), as well as diarrhea (13.4% vs 3.1%; between-group difference, 10.3% [95% CI, 2.7% to 17.9%], P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with non-dialysis-dependent CKD and MDD, treatment with sertraline compared with placebo for 12 weeks did not significantly improve depressive symptoms. These findings do not support the use of sertraline to treat MDD in patients with non-dialysis-dependent CKD. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00946998.


Asunto(s)
Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/tratamiento farmacológico , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/psicología , Sertralina/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Antidepresivos/efectos adversos , Depresión/diagnóstico , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/etiología , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Calidad de Vida , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/efectos adversos , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/uso terapéutico , Sertralina/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento
12.
Am J Nephrol ; 44(3): 234-44, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27592294

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The prognostic utility of self-administered depression scales in chronic kidney disease (CKD) independent of a clinician-based major depressive disorder (MDD) diagnosis is neither clearly established nor are the optimal cutoff scores for predicting outcomes. The overlap between symptoms of depression and chronic disease raises the question of whether a cutoff score on a depression scale can be substituted for a time-consuming diagnostic interview to prognosticate risk. METHODS: The 16-item Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomatology-Self Report scale (QIDS-SR16) was administered to 266 consecutive outpatients with non-dialysis CKD, followed prospectively for 12 months for an apriori composite outcome of death or dialysis or hospitalization. Association of QIDS-SR16 best cutoff score, determined by receiver/responder operating characteristics curves, with outcomes was investigated using survival analysis. The effect modification of an interview-based clinician MDD diagnosis on this association was ascertained. RESULTS: There were 126 composite events. A QIDS-SR16 cutoff ≥8 had the best prognostic accuracy, hazards ratio (HR) = 1.77, 95% CI 1.24-2.53, p = 0.002. This cutoff remained significantly associated with outcomes even after controlling for comorbidities, estimated glomerular filtration rate, hemoglobin and serum albumin, adjusted HR (aHR) = 1.80, 95% CI 1.23-2.62, p = 0.002, and performed similarly to a clinician-based MDD diagnosis (aHR = 1.72, 95% CI 1.14-2.68). Adjustment for MDD conferred the association of QIDS-SR16 with outcomes no longer significant. CONCLUSIONS: QIDS-SR16 cutoff ≥8 adds to the prognostic information available to practicing nephrologists during routine clinic visits from comorbidities and laboratory data. This cutoff score performs similar to a clinician diagnosis of MDD and provides a feasible and time-saving alternative to an interview-based MDD diagnosis for determining prognosis in CKD patients.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/diagnóstico , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/psicología , Autoinforme , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Prospectivos , Curva ROC , Diálisis Renal , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/complicaciones , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/terapia
13.
Depress Anxiety ; 33(9): 870-81, 2016 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27164293

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Functional impairments often remain despite symptomatic improvement with antidepressant treatment, supporting the need for novel treatment approaches. The present study examined the extent to which exercise augmentation improved several domains of psychosocial functioning and quality of life (QoL) among depressed participants. METHODS: Data were collected from 122 partial responders to antidepressant medication. Participants were randomized to either high- (16 kcal/kg of weight/week [KKW]) or low-dose (4-KKW) exercise. Participants completed a combination of supervised and home-based exercise for 12 weeks. The Short-Form Health Survey, Work and Social Adjustment Scale, Social Adjustment Scale, Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire, and Satisfaction with Life Scale were collected at 6 and 12 weeks. Participants with data for at least one of the two follow-up time points (n = 106) were analyzed using a linear mixed model to assess change from baseline within groups and the difference between groups for each psychosocial outcome measure. All analyses controlled for covariates, including baseline depressive symptomatology. RESULTS: Participants experienced significant improvements in functioning across tested domains, and generally fell within a healthy range of functioning on all measures at Weeks 6 and 12. Although no differences were found between exercise groups, improvements were observed across a variety of psychosocial and QoL domains, even in the low-dose exercise group. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support exercise augmentation of antidepressant treatment as a viable intervention for treatment-resistant depression to improve function in addition to symptoms.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/psicología , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/terapia , Trastorno Depresivo Resistente al Tratamiento/psicología , Trastorno Depresivo Resistente al Tratamiento/terapia , Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Ajuste Social , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Terapia Combinada , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/diagnóstico , Trastorno Depresivo Resistente al Tratamiento/diagnóstico , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven
14.
Depress Anxiety ; 33(1): 56-65, 2016 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26477532

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a debilitating disorder characterized by widespread brain abnormalities. The literature is mixed as to whether or not white matter abnormalities are associated with MDD. This study sought to examine fractional anisotropy (FA) in white matter tracts in individuals with MDD using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). METHODS: 139 participants with MDD and 39 healthy controls (HC) in a multisite study were included. DTI scans were acquired in 64 directions and FA was determined in the brain using four methods: region of interest (ROI), tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS), and diffusion tractography. Diffusion connectometry was used to identify white matter pathways associated with MDD. RESULTS: There were no significant differences when comparing FA in MDD and HC groups using any method. In the MDD group, there was a significant relationship between depression severity and FA in the right medial orbitofrontal cortex, and between age of onset of MDD and FA in the right caudal anterior cingulate cortex using the ROI method. There was a significant relationship between age of onset and connectivity in the thalamocortical radiation, inferior longitudinal fasciculus, and cerebellar tracts using diffusion connectometry. CONCLUSIONS: The lack of group differences in FA and connectometry analysis may result from the clinically heterogenous nature of MDD. However, the relationship between FA and depression severity may suggest a state biomarker of depression that should be investigated as a potential indicator of response. Age of onset may also be a significant clinical feature to pursue when studying white matter tracts.


Asunto(s)
Conectoma , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/patología , Imagen de Difusión Tensora , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Sustancia Blanca/patología , Adulto , Anisotropía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino
15.
Am J Addict ; 25(3): 215-20, 2016 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26991889

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Rates of medical illnesses may be higher among individuals with substance use disorders, complicating their care. This study aimed to expand the understanding of other medical conditions in treatment-seeking adults with stimulant use disorder (SUD) using data from Stimulant Reduction Intervention using Dose Exercise (STRIDE), a randomized, multisite trial investigating exercise augmentation of treatment as usual. METHODS: Utilizing STRIDE baseline data, we examined demographic and clinical characteristics based on the number of self-reported diagnosed medical conditions among participants meeting eligibility criteria (passing medical screening exam and maximal exercise test, non-opioid dependent, no concomitant beta blocker, or opioid replacement therapy). RESULTS: The majority (59%) of study participants (N = 302, mean age all participants = 39 years) did not report any history of other medical problems. Those with two or more conditions were older (mean age 46 years), reported more pain and worse physical functioning, and more psychiatric disorders (average 1.44). Hypertension was more common among participants with cocaine use disorders only (present in 16%) and liver disease was more common in those with cocaine plus other stimulant use disorders (present in 7%). CONCLUSION AND SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: In this sample, patients with SUD were in surprisingly good health. A subpopulation had an overall higher burden of illness with worsened physical and psychiatric functioning. Provision of coordinated care may optimize treatment outcomes for patients based on medical comorbidity burden as well as type of drug abused, although these conclusions should be considered preliminary as they are based on self-reported data.


Asunto(s)
Estimulantes del Sistema Nervioso Central/efectos adversos , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Hepatopatías/epidemiología , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Dolor/epidemiología , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Adulto , Comorbilidad , Diagnóstico Dual (Psiquiatría) , Ejercicio Físico , Terapia por Ejercicio , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Aptitud Física , Autoinforme , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/terapia , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
16.
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse ; 42(1): 88-97, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26743586

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Decision-making processes have been posited to affect treatment outcome in addicted patients. OBJECTIVE: The present multi-site study assessed whether two measures of decision-making predicted relapse and subsequent use in stimulant-dependent patients. METHODS: A total of 160 methamphetamine- or cocaine-dependent patients participating in a multi-site clinical trial evaluating a modified 12-step facilitation intervention for stimulant-dependent patients (STAGE-12) were assessed. Decision-making processes of risk and delay (Iowa Gambling Task [IGT]) and response reversal (Wisconsin Card Sorting Task [WCST]) were obtained shortly after treatment admission followed by assessment of stimulant use over the next six months. The relationships of the IGT and WCST (Perseverative Errors) with relapse (yes/no) and days of stimulant use during the 6-month period following post-randomization were evaluated. RESULTS: Performance on the IGT and WCST did not significantly predict relapse status or time to relapse. Unexpectedly, worse performance on the IGT was associated with a fewer number of stimulant use days (p = 0.001). In contrast, worse performance on the WCST (more perseverative errors) was associated with a greater number of stimulant use days (p = 0.0003). The predictive effects of perseverative errors on subsequent use were confined to methamphetamine-dependent and Minority participants. CONCLUSIONS: Decision-making processes, as measured in the current study, do not uniformly predict relapse or subsequent use. A decrease in the salience attribution of non-drug reinforcers may explain the positive relationship between IGT performance and post-relapse use. More comprehensive and global measures of impulsiveness may better assess relapse risk and use.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Relacionados con Anfetaminas/psicología , Trastornos Relacionados con Cocaína/psicología , Toma de Decisiones , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Recurrencia , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto Joven
17.
Hum Brain Mapp ; 36(9): 3472-85, 2015 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26033168

RESUMEN

In the last decade, many studies have used automated processes to analyze magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data such as cortical thickness, which is one indicator of neuronal health. Due to the convenience of image processing software (e.g., FreeSurfer), standard practice is to rely on automated results without performing visual inspection of intermediate processing. In this work, structural MRIs of 40 healthy controls who were scanned twice were used to determine the test-retest reliability of FreeSurfer-derived cortical measures in four groups of subjects-those 25 that passed visual inspection (approved), those 15 that failed visual inspection (disapproved), a combined group, and a subset of 10 subjects (Travel) whose test and retest scans occurred at different sites. Test-retest correlation (TRC), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and percent difference (PD) were used to measure the reliability in the Destrieux and Desikan-Killiany (DK) atlases. In the approved subjects, reliability of cortical thickness/surface area/volume (DK atlas only) were: TRC (0.82/0.88/0.88), ICC (0.81/0.87/0.88), PD (0.86/1.19/1.39), which represent a significant improvement over these measures when disapproved subjects are included. Travel subjects' results show that cortical thickness reliability is more sensitive to site differences than the cortical surface area and volume. To determine the effect of visual inspection on sample size required for studies of MRI-derived cortical thickness, the number of subjects required to show group differences was calculated. Significant differences observed across imaging sites, between visually approved/disapproved subjects, and across regions with different sizes suggest that these measures should be used with caution.


Asunto(s)
Corteza Cerebral/anatomía & histología , Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador/métodos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Reconocimiento de Normas Patrones Automatizadas/métodos , Programas Informáticos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tamaño de los Órganos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Adulto Joven
19.
Am J Addict ; 24(4): 336-40, 2015 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25694201

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Gender-specific factors associated with stimulant abstinence severity were examined in a stimulant abusing or dependent residential treatment sample (N = 302). METHOD: Bivariate statistics tested gender differences in stimulant abstinence symptoms, measured by participant-reported experiences of early withdrawal. Multivariate linear regression examined gender and other predictors of stimulant abstinence symptom severity. RESULTS: Women compared to men reported greater stimulant abstinence symptom severity. Anxiety disorders and individual anxiety-related abstinence symptoms accounted for this difference. African American race/ethnicity was predictive of lower stimulant abstinence severity. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Women were more sensitive to anxiety-related stimulant withdrawal symptoms. SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: Clinics that address anxiety-related abstinence symptoms, which more commonly occur in women, may improve treatment outcome.


Asunto(s)
Estimulantes del Sistema Nervioso Central/efectos adversos , Admisión del Paciente , Tratamiento Domiciliario , Síndrome de Abstinencia a Sustancias/diagnóstico , Adulto , Trastornos de Ansiedad/inducido químicamente , Trastornos de Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores Sexuales , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/tratamiento farmacológico
20.
J Ethn Subst Abuse ; 14(1): 79-95, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25580933

RESUMEN

Comorbid physical and mental health problems are associated with poorer substance abuse treatment outcomes; however, little is known about these conditions among stimulant abusers at treatment entry. This study compared racial and ethnic groups on baseline measures of drug use patterns, comorbid physical and mental health disorders, quality of life, and daily functioning among cocaine and stimulant abusing/dependent patients. Baseline data from a multi-site randomized clinical trial of vigorous exercise as a treatment strategy for a diverse population of stimulant abusers (N=290) were analyzed. Significant differences between groups were found on drug use characteristics, stimulant use disorders, and comorbid mental and physical health conditions. Findings highlight the importance of integrating health and mental health services into substance abuse treatment and could help identify potential areas for intervention to improve treatment outcomes for racial and ethnic minority groups.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Relacionados con Cocaína/terapia , Diversidad Cultural , Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/terapia , Tratamiento Domiciliario/métodos , Adulto , Trastornos Relacionados con Cocaína/etnología , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/etnología , Autoeficacia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA