Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Adm Policy Ment Health ; 43(3): 286-91, 2016 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25344848

RESUMEN

Measurement feedback systems (MFSs) are increasingly recognized as evidence-based treatments for improving mental health outcomes, in addition to being a useful administrative tool for service planning and reporting. Promising research findings have driven practice administrators and policymakers to emphasize the incorporation of outcomes monitoring into electronic health systems. To promote MFS integrity and protect against potentially negative outcomes, it is vital that adoption and implementation be guided by scientifically rigorous yet practical principles. In this point of view, the authors discuss and provide examples of three user-centered and theory-based principles: emphasizing integration with clinical values and workflow, promoting administrative leadership with the 'golden thread' of data-informed decision-making, and facilitating sustainability by encouraging innovation. In our experience, enacting these principles serves to promote sustainable implementation of MFSs in the community while also allowing innovation to occur, which can inform improvements to guide future MFS research.


Asunto(s)
Toma de Decisiones , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/métodos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Retroalimentación , Humanos , Servicios de Salud Mental/organización & administración , Servicios de Salud Mental/normas , Innovación Organizacional , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Flujo de Trabajo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA