Topical vitamin D analogues alone or in association with topical steroids for psoriasis: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this systematic review was to prepare for evidence-based recommendations on the use of vitamin D analogues, and their combination with topical steroids in psoriasis. METHODS: Literature systematic review performed in May 2011. The Cochrane, PubMed and Embase databases were systematically searched with different combinations: including Psoriasis AND calcipotriol expanded to all vitamin D analogues. To assess efficacy across studies, we used two predefined criteria to account for the numerous endpoints found in the literature, 'Treatment success' corresponding to 90% improvement in severity and 'Satisfactory response' corresponding to 75% improvement. We conducted a meta-analysis comparing the efficacy of vitamin D analogues plus topical steroids (VDS) vs. vitamin D analogues alone (VD). To determine the relative cost-efficacy of the topical drugs available on the market, cost/efficacy ratios were calculated for each product according to the approved therapeutic regimen. RESULTS: 51 articles were selected. The application duration varied between three to 52 weeks across studies. VD as monotherapy had a satisfactory response rate between 22% to 96% and a treatment success rate ranging from 4% to 40%. VDS had a satisfactory response rate between 35% to 86% and a treatment success rate ranging from 27% to 53%. A meta-analysis found a probability of success twice higher with VDS than with VD in adult plaque psoriasis. The cost/efficacy ratio was evaluated as 1.2-1.8 times higher for VDS than for VD. CONCLUSION: VDS is twice more effective than VD and displays a better cost per success. Additional studies are needed to clarify maintenance treatment, impact on quality of life, treatment of non-plaque psoriasis. It will be important to harmonize outcome measures in future studies with topical agents in psoriasis to better appraise their efficacy.

Adherence to topical treatment in psoriasis: a systematic literature review.

BACKGROUND: Treatment adherence has been recognized as an important issue in the management of chronic diseases such as psoriasis. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this work was to analyse data about topical treatment adherence in psoriasis. METHODS: Systematic literature review (62 references) between 1980 and 2011 (database: PubMed, Embase and Cochrane; Mesh keywords: Patient Compliance [Mesh] OR Medication Adherence [Mesh] AND Psoriasis [Mesh]; limits: date of publication >1980, humans subjects, written in French or English, aged ≥ 19 years). Two parameters were evaluated: (i) the ratio of number of product applications performed vs. number of applications expected according to physician recommendations, (ii) the ratio of amount of product used vs. amount of product prescribed. RESULTS: A total of 22 studies were selected. Nine studies reported on the frequency of topical treatment application in a real world setting. Five studies showed a frequency of applications varying between 50% and 60% of those expected. Because of the high variability in medication adherence assessment methods, the data could not be combined. Twelve articles reported on the frequency of topical treatment application in randomized controlled trials with adherence varying between 55% and 100%. Concerning the amount of product use, four studies showed patients applied between 35% and 72% of the recommended dose during a treatment period of 14 days to 8 weeks. The most frequently mentioned reasons for non-adherence to topical treatment were low efficacy, time consumption and poor cosmetic characteristics of topical agents. Patients experiencing adherence issues were significant younger, were men, had younger age at onset of psoriasis and had a higher self-assessed severity. To improve adherence, the following strategies were suggested: to give patients information about psoriasis, to recognize social impact, to give written instructions for use such as a care plan, to explain side effects of topical therapies, to choose treatment and its cosmetic properties in agreement with the patient. CONCLUSIONS: Literature data about topical treatment adherence are heterogeneous and scarce. They confirm the limited topical treatment adherence in psoriasis in real life, much lower than what is reported in randomized controlled trials. Therapeutic education and clear instructions on the use of topical agents are necessary to improve adherence. Studies are needed to identify predictors of limited adherence and to identify interventions improving adherence to topical medications in psoriasis.