Psychosocial issues among paediatric health-care workers posted in intensive care unit during COVID-19 pandemic: A questionnaire-based survey (Psy-Co-19 survey).

AIM: To understand the moral distress experienced by health-care workers (HCWs) in the COVID paediatric intensive care unit (PICU). We also aimed to assess the psychological well-being and the coping mechanisms used by HCWs. METHODS: A prospective observational cross-sectional study was conducted from July to September 2021, involving all HCWs who worked in the COVID PICU. Moral distress using Moral Distress for Health-care Professionals (MMD-HPs) scale, psychological well-being using Trauma Screening Questionnaire (TSQ) and coping strategies adopted by HCWs using Brief-COPE (Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced) were measured. RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-four HCW data were examined. The most common causes of moral distress among HCWs were compromised patient care caused by a lack of resources and caring for more patients than they could safely handle. Moral distress was the same regardless of the HCWs' job profile, marital status, number of children or age. The TSQ revealed psychological stress in 23.3% of HCWs with Post-traumatic Stress Disorder, significantly higher in HCWs under the age of 30 and without children. Few HCWs turned to substance use, self-blame or denial as coping mechanisms; instead, acceptance, self-distraction and emotional support were the most frequently used. CONCLUSION: The most common reasons for moral and psychological distress perceived by participants were insufficient staff and organisational support. Younger HCWs and those without children experienced higher levels of psychological distress. HCWs' typical coping mechanisms are constructive, such as seeking help and support from others, reframing situations and meditation. Health-care administrators must develop a framework to assist HCWs in dealing with such serious issues.

Hand Hygiene Compliance in Pediatric Emergency of a Lower-Middle Income Country: A Quality Improvement Study.

Background: Prospective data on hand hygiene compliance in pediatric emergency department (PED) settings is limited. We studied the impact of quality improvement measures on the overall and health care personnel wise hand hygiene compliance rates in a busy PED. Methods: The baseline hand hygiene compliance rates were audited from May-July 2018. The quality improvement interventions included various structural changes to the environment, administrative changes, education and training. During the interventions, auditing was continued for 2 months (August - September 2018). Statistical Process control charts were created. Results: We observed a significant increase in overall compliance rates from 31.8 to 53.9% (p < 0.001). These improvements were observed in the children (29.6 to 46.4%, p < 0.001) as well as neonatal area (35.7% to 59.7, p < 0.001) of PED as well as amongst various health care personnel and in four out of the five moments of hand hygiene. Conclusion: Hand hygiene compliance improved significantly in a busy PED of a lower middle-income country following quality improvement interventions. Such improvement was observed amongst all categories of health care personnel and different types of hand hygiene opportunities. This study demonstrates the feasibility and efficacy of simple quality improvement interventions in a challenging hospital environment.