Empagliflozin in Heart Failure with a Preserved Ejection Fraction.

BACKGROUND: Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors reduce the risk of hospitalization for heart failure in patients with heart failure and a reduced ejection fraction, but their effects in patients with heart failure and a preserved ejection fraction are uncertain. METHODS: In this double-blind trial, we randomly assigned 5988 patients with class II-IV heart failure and an ejection fraction of more than 40% to receive empagliflozin (10 mg once daily) or placebo, in addition to usual therapy. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure. RESULTS: Over a median of 26.2 months, a primary outcome event occurred in 415 of 2997 patients (13.8%) in the empagliflozin group and in 511 of 2991 patients (17.1%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69 to 0.90; P<0.001). This effect was mainly related to a lower risk of hospitalization for heart failure in the empagliflozin group. The effects of empagliflozin appeared consistent in patients with or without diabetes. The total number of hospitalizations for heart failure was lower in the empagliflozin group than in the placebo group (407 with empagliflozin and 541 with placebo; hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.61 to 0.88; P<0.001). Uncomplicated genital and urinary tract infections and hypotension were reported more frequently with empagliflozin. CONCLUSIONS: Empagliflozin reduced the combined risk of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure in patients with heart failure and a preserved ejection fraction, regardless of the presence or absence of diabetes. (Funded by Boehringer Ingelheim and Eli Lilly; EMPEROR-Preserved ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03057951).

Cardiometabolic risk factors and antithrombotic treatment in a Mexican population with atrial fibrillation and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

INTRODUCTION: Heart failure in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) is two to three times more common than in individuals without NVAF. OBJECTIVE: To identify cardiometabolic risk factors (CMRF) and antithrombotic treatment in patients with NVAF and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), and to determine if there were differences according to gender. METHODS: CMRF, pro-thrombotic risk, bleeding risk, and antithrombotic therapy were globally analyzed and according to gender. RESULTS: Out of 1,423 patients with NVAF, 336 had HFrEF. On average, females were older than males. There was no difference between genders with regard to the type of NVAF or direct oral anticoagulants use. Hypertension was more common in women. History of transient ischemic attack was reported in 3.6% of the patients and cerebrovascular event in 10%, without differences in terms of gender. The percentage of men with elevated embolic risk was higher, but without antithrombotic treatment, in comparison with women. CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences were found according to gender in patients with NVAF and HFrEF, both in CMRF and some comorbidities, as well as in antithrombotic treatment according to embolic and bleeding risk.

INTRODUCCIÓN: La insuficiencia cardiaca en pacientes con fibrilación auricular no valvular (FANV) es de dos a tres veces más frecuente que en individuos sin FANV. OBJETIVO: Identificar los factores de riesgo cardiometabólico (FRCM) y el tratamiento antitrombótico de pacientes con FANV e insuficiencia cardiaca con fracción de expulsión reducida (IC-FEr), y determinar si existen diferencias conforme al sexo. MÉTODOS: En forma global y de acuerdo con el sexo se analizaron FRCM, riesgo protrombótico, riesgo de sangrado y terapia antitrombótica. RESULTADOS: De 1423 pacientes con FANV, 336 tuvieron IC-FEr. Las mujeres promediaron mayor edad que los hombres. No hubo diferencia entre los sexos respecto al tipo de FANV o uso de anticoagulantes orales directos. La hipertensión arterial sistémica fue más frecuente en mujeres. Un 3.6 % de los pacientes reportó antecedente de ataque isquémico transitorio y 10 % de evento vascular cerebral, sin diferencias en cuanto al sexo. El porcentaje de hombres con riesgo embólico elevado fue mayor, pero sin tratamiento antitrombótico, en comparación con las mujeres. CONCLUSIONES: Se encontraron diferencias significativas de acuerdo con el sexo en pacientes con FANV e IC-FEr, tanto en FRCM y algunas comorbilidades, como en el tratamiento antitrombótico de acuerdo con el riesgo embólico y de sangrado.

Psychological distress and unsatisfied information needs in heart failure patients and ventricular dysfunction without previously diagnosed psychiatric disorder. Cross-sectional study in a national reference center / Distrés psicológico y necesidades de información insatisfechas en pacientes con insuficiencia cardiaca y disfunción ventricular sin trastorno psiquiátrico previamente diagnosticado. Estudio transversal en un centro de referencia nacional.

Introduction: Heart failure (HF) is a chronic disease that acutely and progressively reduces physical functionality. The patient commonly suffers from intermittent relapses that increase the likelihood of comorbidities such as chronic insomnia, cognitive impairment, alterations in sexual response, psychological distress, symptoms of anxiety and depression disorder, and decreased self-care behaviors. The objective of this study was to identify the main needs for psychological support in patients with HF. Methodology: A descriptive, cross-sectional and analytical study was carried out. Participants were selected through consecutive non-probability samples. 150 patients with a diagnosis of HF who attended the Specialized Center for Heart Failure at the National Institute of Cardiology "Ignacio Chávez" were evaluated from November 2018 to April 2019, applying the inventories: Quality of life in patients with HF (Minnesota), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), psychological distress thermometer (visual analog scale) and the HF Patient Information Needs Inventory. Results: 33% of the patients perceive a high level of psychological distress that requires immediate assistance and 26.6% report a medium level that requires monitoring. The main information needs reported by the patients were information on taking medications (53.7%) and managing psychological distress (43.9%). Conclusion: Active assessment of psychological distress and unmet information needs is relevant in patients with heart failure, thus highlighting the importance of their identification and the correct design and application of evidence-based interventions aimed at their resolution.

Introducción: La insuficiencia cardiaca crónica (ICC) es una enfermedad que reduce de manera aguda y progresiva la funcionalidad física. El paciente comúnmente sufre de recaídas intermitentes que aumentan la probabilidad de comorbilidades como insomnio crónico, deterioro cognitivo, alteraciones en la respuesta sexual, estrés psicológico, síntomas de trastorno de ansiedad y depresión y disminución de las conductas de autocuidado. Objetivo: Identificar las principales necesidades de apoyo psicológico en pacientes con IC. Metodología: Se realizó un estudio descriptivo, transversal y analítico. Se evaluaron 150 pacientes con ICC del Centro Especializado en Insuficiencia Cardiaca del Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez de noviembre de 2018 a abril de 2019. Se aplicaron los inventarios: Calidad de vida en pacientes con IC (Minnesota), Escala de Ansiedad y Depresión Hospitalaria (HADS), termómetro del distrés psicológico (escala analógica visual) y el Inventario de Necesidades de Información del Paciente con IC. Resultados: Treinta y tres por ciento de los pacientes perciben un nivel alto de distrés psicológico que requiere asistencia inmediata y el 26.6% reporta un nivel medio que requiere monitoreo. Las principales necesidades de información reportadas por los pacientes fueron información sobre la toma de medicamentos (53.7%) y manejo del estrés psicológico (43.9%). Conclusión: En pacientes con IC es relevante la valoración activa de distrés psicológico y necesidades de información no cubiertas, resaltando de este modo la importancia de su identificación y el correcto diseño y aplicación de intervenciones basadas en la evidencia enfocadas a su resolución.

Adverse effects, pharmacological interactions, and cardiovascular drugs in COVID-19 treatment.

In severe coronavirus disease (COVID)-19 patients, an extraordinary systemic inflammatory response is seen. It could impact in multiple organ disorders, specially a severe myocardial injury, an acute myocarditis results in focal or global myocardial inflammation and necrosis. Those events can be present in healthy subjects or cardiovascular (CV) patients. It is clinically associated with ventricular dysfunction exacerbation or worsening and tachyarrhythmias. It is also related to a poor outcome for CV patients with ischemic heart disease, hypertensión, and heart failure. COVID-19 patients require multiple and complex treatment that alleviates symptoms, the vast variety of agents interacts with diseases and CV drugs. Our purpose is to correlate in guidance synopsis: Adverse effects, pharmacological interactions, and CV drugs in COVID-19 treatment.

En pacientes con COVID-19 grave se ha observado una extraordinaria respuesta inflamatoria sistémica. Este impacto se traduce en múltiples trastornos de órganos, especialmente cardíacos, por lesión miocárdica grave, miocarditis aguda que resulta en inflamación focal o miocárdica global, necrosis cardiaca. Estos tremendos eventos son observados en sujetos sanos como pacientes cardiovasculares. Clínicamente asociados con nueva presentación o empeoramiento de la disfunción ventricular y taquiarritmias. Relacionado a un predictor principal de malos resultado en pacientes cardiovasculares (CV), especialmente en aquellos con cardiopatía isquémica, hipertensión e insuficiencia cardíaca. Los enfermos con COVID-19 requieren múltiples y complejos tratamientos que alivien los síntomas, esta gran variedad de agentes interactúa con enfermedades y medicamentos CV. Nuestro propósito es correlacionar, en una guía sinóptica: efectos adversos, interacciones farmacológicas y fármacos cardiovasculares en el tratamiento del COVID-19.

Explaining the increment in coronary heart disease mortality in Mexico between 2000 and 2012.

BACKGROUND: Mexico is still in the growing phase of the epidemic of coronary heart disease (CHD), with mortality increasing by 48% since 1980. However, no studies have analyzed the drivers of these trends. We aimed to model CHD deaths between 2000 and 2012 in Mexico and to quantify the proportion of the mortality change attributable to advances in medical treatments and to changes in population-wide cardiovascular risk factors. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis using the previously validated IMPACT model to explain observed changes in CHD mortality in Mexican adults. The model integrates nationwide data at two-time points (2000 and 2012) to quantify the effects on CHD mortality attributable to changes in risk factors and therapeutic trends. RESULTS: From 2000 to 2012, CHD mortality rates increased by 33.8% in men and by 22.8% in women. The IMPACT model explained 71% of the CHD mortality increase. Most of the mortality increases could be attributed to increases in population risk factors, such as diabetes (43%), physical inactivity (28%) and total cholesterol (24%). Improvements in medical and surgical treatments together prevented or postponed 40.3% of deaths; 10% was attributable to improvements in secondary prevention treatments following MI, while 5.3% to community heart failure treatments. CONCLUSIONS: CHD mortality in Mexico is increasing due to adverse trends in major risk factors and suboptimal use of CHD treatments. Population-level interventions to reduce CHD risk factors are urgently needed, along with increased access and equitable distribution of therapies.

Characteristics and 2-year outcomes of dabigatran treatment in patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation: GLORIA-AF.

AIMS: This study aimed to describe baseline characteristics of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) at risk of stroke with and without history of heart failure (HF) and report 2-year outcomes in the dabigatran-treated subset of a prospective, global, observational study (GLORIA-AF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Newly diagnosed patients with AF and CHA2 DS2 -VASc score ≥ 1 were consecutively enrolled. Baseline characteristics were assessed by the presence or absence of HF diagnosis at enrolment. Incidence rates for outcomes in dabigatran-treated patients were estimated with and without standardization by stroke (excluding HF component) and bleeding risk scores. A total of 15 308 eligible patients were enrolled, including 15 154 with known HF status; of these, 3679 (24.0%) had been diagnosed with HF, 11 475 (75.0%) had not. Among 4873 dabigatran-treated patients, 1169 (24.0%) had HF, and 3658 (75.1%) did not; the risk of stroke was high (CHA2 DS2 -VASc score ≥ 2) for 94.3% of patients with HF and 85.8% without, while 6.0% and 7.0%, respectively, had a high bleeding risk (HAS-BLED ≥ 3). Incidence rates of all-cause death in dabigatran-treated patients with and without HF, standardized for CHA2 DS2 -VASc and HAS-BLED scores, were 4.76 vs. 1.80 per 100 patient years (py), with roughly comparable rates of stroke (0.82 vs. 0.60 per 100 py) and major bleeding (1.20 vs. 0.92 per 100 py). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with AF and history of HF may have greater disease burden at AF diagnosis and increased mortality rates vs. patients without HF. Stroke and major bleeding rates were roughly comparable between groups confirming the long-term safety and effectiveness of dabigatran in patients with HF.

Management of Cardiovascular Disease Patients With Confirmed or Suspected COVID-19 in Limited Resource Settings.

In this paper, we provide recommendations on the management of cardiovascular disease (CVD) among patients with confirmed or suspected coronavirus disease (COVID-19) to facilitate the decision making of healthcare professionals in low resource settings. The emergence of novel coronavirus disease, also known as Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), has presented an unprecedented global challenge for the healthcare community. The ability of SARS-CoV-2 to get transmitted during the asymptomatic phase and its high infectivity have led to the rapid transmission of COVID-19 beyond geographic regions, leading to a pandemic. There is concern that COVID-19 is cardiotropic, and it interacts with the cardiovascular system on multiple levels. Individuals with established CVD are more susceptible to severe COVID-19. Through a consensus approach involving an international group this WHF statement summarizes the links between cardiovascular disease and COVID-19 and present some practical recommendations for the management of hypertension and diabetes, acute coronary syndrome, heart failure, rheumatic heart disease, Chagas disease, and myocardial injury for patients with COVID-19 in low-resource settings. This document is not a clinical guideline and it is not intended to replace national clinical guidelines or recommendations. Given the rapidly growing burden posed by COVID-19 illness and the associated severe prognostic implication of CVD involvement, further research is required to understand the potential mechanisms linking COVID-19 and CVD, clinical presentation, and outcomes of various cardiovascular manifestations in COVID-19 patients.

Correction: Management of Cardiovascular Disease Patients With Confirmed or Suspected COVID-19 in Limited Resource Settings.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.5334/gh.823.].

Clinimetric analysis of heart failure in Mexican patients.

Heart failure (HF) is a syndrome characterized basically by a circulatory deficit to cover the metabolic and energetic demands of the body. This condition has a broad spectrum in its clinical presentation, affects the quality of life significantly, impacts the family/social environment, and generates a great demand for health services. The purpose of this research is to report the situational diagnose of patients with HF in Mexico. We evaluated 292 patients, 70.2% were men. Average age was 56.7 ± 14.3 years. Ischemic heart disease is the main etiology (98 patients, 33.9%) followed by hypertensive (22.6%) and idiopathic (23.3%) heart disease. The associated clinical background was obesity (31.1%), systemic hypertension (36.7%), myocardial infarction (26.4%), and dyslipidemia (15.1%). The most common symptom was stress dyspnea (41.4%) and jugular vein engorgement at physical examination (32.5%). Anemia was observed in 1% of patients. The average left ventricular ejection fraction was 29.2 ± 10.6%. Sinus rhythm was the most frequently detected in 84.9%. 19.9% of patients had an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator or cardiac resynchronization therapy. 13.7% of patients with QRS > 130 ms. In our population, the meta-analysis global group in chronic heart failure risk score calculated was 16.8 ± 5.7 and for EMPHASIS 3.3 ± 1.5. We observed that age at presentation in HF in this analysis is at least 10 years younger than in other reports. The grade of obesity takes relevance in our group. The association of anemia and HF in Mexico is rare.

La insuficiencia cardiaca es un síndrome caracterizado fundamentalmente por un déficit circulatorio para cubrir las demandas metabólicas y energéticas del organismo. Esta entidad tiene un amplio espectro en su presentación clínica, afecta de manera significativa la calidad de vida, impacta en el entorno familiar/social y genera una gran demanda de los servicios de salud. El propósito de esta investigación es reportar el diagnóstico situacional de pacientes con insuficiencia cardiaca (IC) en México. Evaluamos 292 enfermos, 70.2% eran hombres. Con edad promedio 56.7 ± 14.3 años. La principal etiología es la cardiopatía isquémica (33.9%), seguida de la hipertensiva (22.6%) e idiopática (23.3%). Los antecedentes clínicos asociados fueron: obesidad (31.1%), hipertensión arterial sistémica (36.7%), infarto al miocardio (26.4%) y dislipidemia (15.1%). El síntoma con mayor presentación fue la disnea de esfuerzos (41.4%) y a la exploración física la ingurgitación yugular (32.5%). Se observó anemia en 1% de los enfermos. La fracción de expulsión del ventrículo izquierdo (FEVI) promedio fue de 29.2 + 10.6%. El ritmo sinusal fue el más frecuentemente detectado en 84.9%. El 19.9% de los pacientes tenían instalado un desfibrilador automático implantable (DAI) o tratamiento de resincronización cardiaca (TRC). El 13.7% de los enfermos con QRS mayor de 130 ms. El riesgo (MAGGIC) calculado en nuestro grupo poblacional fue de 16.8 ± 5.7 y para EMPHASIS 3.3 ± 1.5. Observamos que la edad de presentación de la IC en el presente análisis es menor por 10 años en comparación con otros reportes. El grado de obesidad toma relevancia en nuestro grupo. La asociación de anemia e IC en México es poco frecuente.

A proposed functional clinical classification predicts in-hospital and long-term survival in the setting of acute right ventricular infarction.

BACKGROUND: The objectives of the present investigation were to validate the prognostic role of a proposed Clinical Classification [CC], to evaluate the TIMI risk score [RS] and to establish whether the TIMI-RS should incorporate points for patients with acute right ventricular infarction [TIMI-RS-RVI]. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 523 RVI patients were classified on clinical and functional basis as: A, without right ventricular failure [RVF], B with RVF and C with cardiogenic shock. The CC was evaluated prospectively among 98 patients with RVI and retrospectively in 425 RVI patients. The TIMI-RS was evaluated prospectively among 622 patients with STEMI [anterior:277, inferior:247, RVI:98], and retrospectively in 425 RVI patients. The CC established differences among the 3-RVI Classes for in-hospital mortality [prospectively and retrospectively; p<0.01, p<0.001, respectively] that were maintained at 8 years [p < 0.001]. Patients with anterior and inferior STEMI, but not those with RVI revealed an association between outcome and TIMI-RS [p<0.001]. Testing for TIMI-RS-RVI did not result a good prognostic tool [ROC=0.9; excellent discrimination, but with a very poor "clinical calibration"]. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed CC allowed prediction of mortality at short- and long-term in the setting of acute RVI. The role of the TIMI-RS should be reevaluated prospectively as a prognostic tool in the scenario of RVI patients.

Factores de riesgo cardiometabólico y tratamiento antitrombótico en población mexicana con fibrilación auricular e insuficiencia cardiaca con fracción de expulsión reducida / Cardiometabolic risk factors and antithrombotic treatment in a Mexican population with atrial fibrillation and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

Resumen Introducción: La insuficiencia cardiaca en pacientes con fibrilación auricular no valvular (FANV) es de dos a tres veces más frecuente que en individuos sin FANV. Objetivo: Identificar los factores de riesgo cardiometabólico (FRCM) y el tratamiento antitrombótico de pacientes con FANV e insuficiencia cardiaca con fracción de expulsión reducida (IC-FEr), y determinar si existen diferencias conforme al sexo. Métodos: En forma global y de acuerdo con el sexo se analizaron FRCM, riesgo protrombótico, riesgo de sangrado y terapia antitrombótica. Resultados: De 1423 pacientes con FANV, 336 tuvieron IC-FEr. Las mujeres promediaron mayor edad que los hombres. No hubo diferencia entre los sexos respecto al tipo de FANV o uso de anticoagulantes orales directos. La hipertensión arterial sistémica fue más frecuente en mujeres. Un 3.6 % de los pacientes reportó antecedente de ataque isquémico transitorio y 10 % de evento vascular cerebral, sin diferencias en cuanto al sexo. El porcentaje de hombres con riesgo embólico elevado fue mayor, pero sin tratamiento antitrombótico, en comparación con las mujeres. Conclusiones: Se encontraron diferencias significativas de acuerdo con el sexo en pacientes con FANV e IC-FEr, tanto en FRCM y algunas comorbilidades, como en el tratamiento antitrombótico de acuerdo con el riesgo embólico y de sangrado.

Abstract Introduction: Heart failure in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) is two to three times more common than in individuals without NVAF. Objective: To identify cardiometabolic risk factors (CMRF) and antithrombotic treatment in patients with NVAF and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), and to determine if there were differences according to gender. Methods: CMRF, pro-thrombotic risk, bleeding risk, and antithrombotic therapy were globally analyzed and according to gender. Results: Out of 1,423 patients with NVAF, 336 had HFrEF. On average, females were older than males. There was no difference between genders with regard to the type of NVAF or direct oral anticoagulants use. Hypertension was more common in women. History of transient ischemic attack was reported in 3.6% of the patients and cerebrovascular event in 10%, without differences in terms of gender. The percentage of men with elevated embolic risk was higher, but without antithrombotic treatment, in comparison with women. Conclusions: Significant differences were found according to gender in patients with NVAF and HFrEF, both in CMRF and some comorbidities, as well as in antithrombotic treatment according to embolic and bleeding risk.

[Recent considerations of cardiogenic shock associated to the acute coronary ischemic syndromes]. / Consideraciones fisiopatológicas actuales del choque cardiogénico asociado a los síndromes isquémicos coronarios agudos.

We review novel physiopathological concept of Cardiogenic Shock associated to acute coronary ischemic syndromes, where the mechanist terms become jumbled not only, but the neuro-hormonal, immuno-inflammatory, and biomolecular alterations. In order to offer a pharmacointensive treatment that obtains the stabilization of the acute coronary Syndrome, for the reduction of myocardial ischemia. Also, we incorporate the incidence of this pathology in the Mexican population.

[From the single vulnerable plaque, to the multiple complex coronary plaques. From their basis, to the modern therapeutic approach. A clinical reality in the spectrum of the acute coronary syndromes]. / De la placa vulnerable solitaria, a la coronariopatía de multiples vasos. De sus fundamentos, a las implicaciones terapéuticas modernas. Una realidad clínica en el espectro de los SICA.

Contemporary clinical and laboratory data have challenged our classical concepts of the pathogenesis of the acute coronary syndromes [ACS]. Indeed, several independent lines of clinical evidence have supported that the critical stenoses cause only a fraction of the ACS. Acute myocardial infarction is believed to be caused by rupture of a vulnerable coronary-artery plaque that appears as a single lesion on angiography. However, plaque instability might be caused by pathophysiologic processes, such as inflammation, that exert adverse effects throughout the coronary vasculature and therefore result in multiple unstable lesions. Recent studies have demonstrated that ruptured or vulnerable plaques exist not only at the culprit lesion but also in the whole coronary artery in some ACS patients. It has also been reported that a ruptured plaque at the culprit lesion is associated with elevated C- reactive protein and other inflammatory markers, which indeed indicate a poor prognosis in patients with ACS. Also, multiple plaque rupture is associated with systemic inflammation, and patients with multiple plaque rupture can be expected to show a poor prognosis. Therefore some ACS patients [20-40%] may harbor multiple complex coronary plaques that are associated with adverse clinical outcomes. It should be accepted that this ACS population represent a part of the spectrum of the ACS, and in particular in this group of patients treatment should focus not only on the stabilization of the culprit site but also warrants a broader approach to systemic stabilization of the arteries. However, recurrent cardiovascular events in this population still remain unacceptably high, indicating that plaque rupture or vulnerability of multiple plaques is a current challenge in the management of ACS patients.

[From the single vulnerable plaque, to the multiple complex coronary plaques. From their basis, to the modern therapeutic approach. A clinical reality in the spectrum of the acute coronary syndromes]. / De la placa vulnerable solitaria, a la coronariopatía de múltiples vasos. De sus fundamentos, a las implicaciones terapéuticas modernas. Una realidad clínica en el espectro de los SICA.

Contemporary clinical and laboratory data have challenged our classical concepts of the pathogenesis of the acute coronary syndromes [ACS]. Indeed, several independent lines of clinical evidence have supported that the critical stenoses cause only a fraction of the ACS. Acute myocardial infarction is believed to be caused by rupture of a vulnerable coronary-artery plaque that appears as a single lesion on angiography. However, plaque instability might be caused by pathophysiologic processes, such as inflammation, that exert adverse effects throughout the coronary vasculature and therefore result in multiple unstable lesions. Recent studies have demonstrated that ruptured or vulnerable plaques exist not only at the culprit lesion but also in the whole coronary artery in some ACS patients. It has also been reported that a ruptured plaque at the culprit lesion is associated with elevated C- reactive protein and other inflammatory markers, which indeed indicate a poor prognosis in patients with ACS. Also, multiple plaque rupture is associated with systemic inflammation, and patients with multiple plaque rupture can be expected to show a poor prognosis. Therefore some ACS patients [20-40%] may harbor multiple complex coronary plaques that are associated with adverse clinical outcomes. It should be accepted that this ACS population represent a part of the spectrum of the ACS, and in particular in this group of patients treatment should focus not only on the stabilization of the culprit site but also warrants a broader approach to systemic stabilization of the arteries. However, recurrent cardiovascular events in this population still remain unacceptably high, indicating that plaque rupture or vulnerability of multiple plaques is a current challenge in the management of ACS patients.

["Cardiac power output" an old tool, possibly a modern tool for assessing cardiac pumping capability, as well as for a short-term prognosis in cardiogenic shock due to acute myocardial infarction]. / "ll poder cardíaco" un instrumento del pasado, posiblemente una herramienta moderna en la valoración: clínica, terapéutica y pronóstica del choque cardiogénico por síndrome isquémico coronario agudo.

Hemodynamic monitoring has been used extensively during the last decades for risk stratification and guiding treatment of patients with cardiovascular destabilization, especially in the scenario of acute heart failure and cardiac shock. Every cardiac pump has its own maximum performance, which denotes its pumping capability. The heart is a muscular mechanical pump with an ability to generate both flow (cardiac output) and pressure. The product of flow output and systemic arterial pressure is the rate of useful work done, "or the cardiac power" (CP). Cardiac pumping capability can be defined as the cardiac power output achieved by the heart during maximal stimulation, and cardiac reserve is the increase in power output as the cardiac performance is increased from the resting to the maximally stimulated state (CPR). Resting CP for a hemodynamically stable average sized adult is approximately 1 W. However, during stress or exercise, CPR can be recruited to increase the heart's pumping ability up to 6 W. In acute heart failure, the patient becomes hemodynamically unstable, and most of the cardiac pumping potential is recruited in order to sustain life. Hence, cardiac power measurements in patients with acute heart failure or with cardiogenic shock at rest represent most of the recruitable reserve available during the acute event, and their measurement reflects the severity of the patient's condition. It has been found that a cutoff value for CP of 0.53 W accurately predict in-hospital mortality for cardiogenic shock patients. Others investigators observed cutoff for increased mortality of CP < 1 W, data that were obtained at doses of maximal pharmacologic support yielding the individual maximal CP. In our experience, the cutoff value for CP that accurately predicts in-hospital mortality for cardiogenic shock patients is 0.7 W, but its impact on short-term prognosis is clearer if the patient achieves a CP equal or higher than 1 W after an optimal myocardial revascularization with interventional cardiac procedures. According to the data collected from the literature, CP deserves a place in the evaluation of the patient with cardiogenic shock due to an acute myocardial infarction, but a more profound analysis of this parameter an further evaluation are required in order to better understand its prognostic meaning in this acute cardiac syndrome.

[Mortality in cardiogenic shock]. / Choque cardiogénico. Las variables de mortalidad.

OBJECTIVE: Cardiogenic shock (CS) is one of principal causes of mortality after an acute myocardial infarction (MI). The objective of this study was to determine the principal causes that contribute to an increase in mortality in CS. METHODS: We studied 155 consecutive patients with CS admitted to the Coronary Care Unit of the Instituto Nacional de Cardiologia Ignacio Chávez from 1990-2002. RESULTS: Patients older than 60 years with MI and diabetes mellitus presented a higher cardiovascular mortality (p<0.001). Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures decreased the cardiovascular mortaly in CS as compared to those patients not submmitted to PCI (59% vs. 98%, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Mortality due to CS is still very high (80%). Previous MI and diabetes favor short-term mortality and the use of PCI suggests a clinical favourable trend in the reduction of mortality due to CS. PCI appears to be the most appropriate reperfusion procedure for treating CS.

Acute right ventricular infarction: clinical spectrum, results of reperfusion therapy and short-term prognosis.

BACKGROUND: The role of thrombolytic therapy (TT) and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) in subgroups of patients with right ventricular infarction (RVI) has not been evaluated. METHODS AND RESULTS: We risk-stratified 302 patients with RVI into three subsets upon admission. Class A (n=197) comprised patients without right ventricular (RV) failure, Class B (n=69) with RV failure and Class C (n=36) with cardiogenic shock. All eligible patients in Class A or B received either PCI or TT. Patients in Class C eligible for reperfusion were treated with PCI. All patients were evaluated for in-hospital major adverse cardiac events and short-term mortality. There was a statistically significant difference in in-hospital mortality among the classes. Classes B and C were the strongest indicators of in-hospital mortality. By multivariate analysis TT or PCI did not reduce mortality in Classes A and B, but a clinically favorable trend in mortality reduction was documented: both methods decreased RV dysfunction in Class B (from 97% to 61% with TT and to 28% with PCI; P < 0.001) and PCI reduced the risk of mortality in Class C (89.5% compared with 58%; P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Classification into types A, B or C allows the prediction of mortality. The use of TT or PCI suggests a clinical favorable trend in the reduction of mortality in Class A, either is beneficial in Class B for decreasing morbidity and PCI appears to be the most appropriate procedure for Class C since it reduced mortality.

[Heart failure in acute myocardial infarction]. / La insuficiencia cardiaca en el infarto agudo del miocardio.

Heart failure during the immediate period of an acute myocardial infarction constitutes a major insult to this pathology; since, once installed, it is associate to ventricular dysfunction and expansion of the left ventricle. It can appear either early or delayed. Subsequent to the acute insult, the myocardium is subjected to diverse changes in its anatomical conformation and to diastolic and systolic alterations, which will affect the hemodynamic constants of the patient. Changes in the parietal ventricular architecture as well as at the neurohumoral level will also occur. The clinical signs of heart failure are: dyspnea, pallor, tachycardia, diaphoresis, cold skin, oliguria, somnolence, and gallop, which can be observed at the very beginning of the coronary occlusion. Its clinical identification, through in-hospital studies supported by adequate hemodynamic monitoring, is of utter relevance since it will lead to appropriate and fast treatment. The groups of patients with acute myocardial infarction with high risk for the development of cardiac failure are: patients with extensive Q wave infarction, diabetic, patients over 65 years of age, and those with a history of previous myocardial infarction(s). The cornerstone of treatment must be focused on reducing the myocardial ischemia, which can be achieved through the use of modern therapeutics and, given the case, pharmacological agents, coronary intervention procedures, or cardiac surgery must be taken into account. At present it is known that angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, betablockers, inotropics, are useful to improve ventricular function in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

[Evaluation of TIMI-4 flow at the coronary unit (INCICH)]. / Valoración del flujo TIMI-4 en la unidad coronaria (INCICH).

At present, the use of techniques that lead to assess coronary flow is determined by methods that include mostly coronary angiography, which is a fundamental tool in the evaluation of acute myocardial infarction carrier patients. The assessment of the myocardial flow permeability state, determined through TIMI-4 flow, allows to establish more precisely the impact of the used reperfusion treatment. The most common way of assessing it at the Coronary Unit is through contrast echocardiography using pharmacological agents with harmonic properties.

[Decrease of total hemorrhage with reduced doses of enoxaparin in high risk unstable angina. ENHNFAI study. (Enoxaparin vs non-fractionated heparin in unstable angina). Preliminary report]. / Disminución de hemorragias totales con dosis reducidas de enoxaparina en angina inestable de alto riesgo. Estudio ENHNFAI. (ENoxaparina vs Heparina No Fraccionada en Angina inestable). Informe preliminar.

UNLABELLED: In this prospective, randomized and controlled study, we compare complications in 2 groups of patients: group 1, enoxaparin 0.8 mg/kg, subcutaneous every 12 hours during 5 days, and group 2, intravenous unfractionated heparin during 5 days, by infusion treated to activate partial tromboplastin time 1.5-2 the upper limit of normal. Blood samples were obtained at 4, 12, 24 hours and at day 5 of treatment, to measure anti-Xa levels, and also, evaluated end points at 30 days, between groups. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed with clinical and angiographic variables between groups, with p < 0.05. RESULTS: 203 consecutive patients, average age of 60.5 +/- 11.2 years, and 80% men, were included. There were no differences in clinical and angiographic characteristics. All patients with enoxaparin had therapeutic levels of anti-Xa, of 0.5 to 0.67 U/mL. There was increasing risk of total bleeding in group 2 (18.7%) than in group 1 (5.6%), with RR = 1.72 (95% CI 1.29, 2.29), p = .003. Also, there was 33.3% of MACE in group 2, and only 17.8% in group 1, with RR = 1.88 (CI 95% 1.29, 2.29), p = .011. CONCLUSIONS: 1) Low doses of enoxaparine achieve therapeutic levels, since the first 4 hours of treatment. 2) A significant reduction of total bleeding occurred with the low doses of enoxaparin, with the same efficacy to reduce MACE during follow-up.