Dopamine D1 Receptor Agonists Rescue Age-related Decline in Temporal Order Memory.

Dopamine D1 receptor agonists improve spatial working memory, but their effects on temporal order memory, particularly prone to the effects of aging, have not been studied. Two D1 agonists, PF6256142 (PF) and 2-methyldihydrexidine (2MDHX), were examined for their effects in a rodent temporal order recognition task. Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that there is an age-related decline in rodent temporal order memory. The data also show that either agonist rescues the poor memory performance with a large effective size. Interestingly, the optimal effective dose varied among individual rats of different age groups. PF showed greater potency for older rats, whereas 2MDHX showed better overall population effectiveness. Both PF and 2MDHX have high intrinsic activity at rodent D1-mediated cAMP synthesis. Conversely, at D1-mediated ß-arrestin recruitment, PF has essentially no intrinsic activity, whereas 2MDHX is a super-agonist. These findings suggest that D1 agonists have potential to treat age-related cognitive decline, and the pattern of functional selectivity may be useful for developing drugs with an improved therapeutic index.

Characterization of behavioral changes in T-maze alternation from dopamine D1 agonists with different receptor coupling mechanisms.

RATIONALE: Dopamine D1 receptor agonists have been shown to improve working memory, but often have a non-monotonic (inverted-U) dose-response curve. One hypothesis is that this may reflect dose-dependent differential engagement of D1 signaling pathways, a mechanism termed functional selectivity or signaling bias. OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: To test this hypothesis, we compared two D1 ligands with different signaling biases in a rodent T-maze alternation task. Both tested ligands (2-methyldihydrexidine and CY208243) have high intrinsic activity at cAMP signaling, but the former also has markedly higher intrinsic activity at D1-mediated recruitment of ß-arrestin. The spatial working memory was assessed via the alternation behavior in the T-maze where the alternate choice rate quantified the quality of the memory and the duration prior to making a choice represented the decision latency. RESULTS: Both D1 drugs changed the alternate rate and the choice latency in a dose-dependent manner, albeit with important differences. 2-Methyldihydrexidine was somewhat less potent but caused a more homogeneous improvement than CY208243 in spatial working memory. The maximum changes in the alternate rate and the choice latency tended to occur at different doses for both drugs. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that D1 signaling bias in these two pathways (cAMP vs ß-arrestin) has complex effects on cognitive processes as assessed by T-maze alternation. Understanding these mechanisms should allow the identification or discovery of D1 agonists that can provide superior cognitive enhancement.