Automated Breast Ultrasound for Evaluating Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy: A Comparison with Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is currently used for treating breast cancer in selected cases. Our study aims to evaluate the role of automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) in the assessment of response to NAC and compare the ABUS results with MRI. Methods: A total of 52 consecutive patients were included in this study. ABUS and MRI sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), diagnostic accuracy (DA), positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated and represented using Area Under ROC Curve (ROC) analysis, searching for any significant difference (p < 0.05). The McNemar test was used searching for any significant difference in terms of sensitivity by comparing the ABUS and MRI results. The inter-observer agreement between the readers in evaluating the response to NAC for both MRI and ABUS was calculated using Cohen's kappa k coefficient. Results: A total of 35 cases of complete response and 17 cases of persistent disease were found. MRI showed SE, SP, DA, PPV, and NPV values of 100%, 88%, 92%, 81%, and 100%, respectively, with an AUC value of 0.943 (p < 0.0001). ABUS showed SE, SP, DA, PPV, and NPV values of 88%, 94%, 92%, 89%, and 94%, respectively, with an AUC of 0.913 (p < 0.0001). The McNemar test revealed no significant difference (p = 0.1250). The inter-observer agreement between the two readers in evaluating the response to NAC for MRI and ABUS was, respectively, 0.88 and 0.89. Conclusions: Automatic breast ultrasound represents a new accurate, tri-dimensional and operator-independent tool for evaluating patients referred to NAC.

A rare case of chronic pain and atraumatic inability to flex the knee: Evidence of a unilateral accessory popliteus muscle.

The literature describes a few case reports of bilateral accessory popliteus muscle, a rare variant of the popliteus muscle. We report a case of a 24-year-old male patient with acute pain and inability to flex the left knee, without a traumatic event. Additionally, the patient reported mild sensitive symptoms in the left calf region and no pain in the right knee. The patient underwent a series of other examinations which culminated in a Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) that showed an accessory popliteus muscle. The comparative study of the contralateral knee showed no evidence of this anatomic variant.