Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
World J Surg ; 36(2): 270-7, 2012 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22113844

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hypoglycemia has emerged as a barrier to the practice of intensive insulin therapy. Current literature suggests that hypoglycemia occurs at variable rates and has different effects on outcomes in surgical and medical populations. We sought to determine the incidence, independent predictors, and effect on outcome of severe hypoglycemia (≤ 40 mg/dl) in a surgical population. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on all critically ill surgical patients treated with IIT from October 2004 to February 2007. Euglycemia (goal 80-110 mg/dl) was maintained using automated computerized titration of an insulin infusion. The primary outcome of interest was any episode of severe hypoglycemia (≤ 40 mg/dl). Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the independent predictors of developing severe hypoglycemia. RESULTS: A total of 60,298 data entries (1,118 patients) for glucose were analyzed. There were 64 severe hypoglycemic episodes in 52 patients (4.6% of the patients). There was a significant increase in deaths among patients who experienced at least one episode of hypoglycemia when compared with those who did not (26.9% vs. 15.3%, P = 0.03). Logistic regression revealed that the time spent on the protocol was the best predictor of developing a hypoglycemic event when controlling for other known risk factors of hypoglycemia. CONCLUSIONS: Intensive insulin therapy can be implemented with a low percentage of patients (4.6%) experiencing severe hypoglycemia. Mortality rate was higher for patients experiencing hypoglycemia. The duration of the time spent on the protocol was the best predictor of hypoglycemia, suggesting that hypoglycemia is a mathematic probability of prolonged illness, not a reflection of illness severity or demographic features.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Hiperglucemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipoglucemia/inducido químicamente , Hipoglucemiantes/efectos adversos , Insulina/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Enfermedad Crítica/mortalidad , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Hipoglucemia/mortalidad , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Insulina/uso terapéutico , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos , Factores de Tiempo
2.
Am Surg ; 76(12): 1377-83, 2010 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21265352

RESUMEN

Our hypothesis was to determine if insulin resistance and hyperglycemia, rather than obesity, are predictive of mortality in the surgically critically ill. An observational study of an automated protocol in surgical and trauma intensive care units was performed. Two groups were created based on body mass index (BMI): Obese (OB) defined as BMI > or = 30 (n = 338) and nonobese defined as BMI < 30 (n = 885). Euglycemia was maintained using an automated protocol using an adapting multiplier, which we used as our marker of stress insulin resistance. The primary outcome was hospital mortality. One thousand, two hundred and twenty-three patients met criteria with 73,225 glucose values. The OB group required more insulin (4.5 U/hr vs 3.2 U/hr, P < or = 0.01) and had a higher mean multiplier (0.07 vs 0.06, P < 0.01) reflecting insulin resistance. There was no difference in mortality between OB and nonobese (11.6% vs 11.5%, P = 0.96). Logistic regression showed that insulin dose (odds ratio 0.864; 95% confidence interval 0.772-0.967, P = 0.01), and not BMI, was an independent predictor of survival in this population. Obesity is not an independent risk factor for mortality in the surgical critical care population. Insulin resistance and subsequent hyperglycemia are increased in obesity and are independent predictors of mortality.


Asunto(s)
Glucemia/análisis , Enfermedad Crítica/mortalidad , Obesidad/metabolismo , Adulto , Índice de Masa Corporal , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Hiperglucemia/epidemiología , Resistencia a la Insulina/fisiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad/epidemiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos , Análisis de Supervivencia
3.
J Trauma ; 68(2): 471-7, 2010 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20154559

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Blunt injury to the carotid or vertebral vessels (blunt cerebrovascular injury [BCVI]) is diagnosed in approximately 1 of 1,000 (0.1%) patients hospitalized for trauma in the United States with the majority of these injuries diagnosed after the development of symptoms secondary to central nervous system ischemia, with a resultant neurologic morbidity of up to 80% and associated mortality of up to 40%. With screening, the incidence rises to 1% of all blunt trauma patients and as high as 2.7% in patients with an Injury Severity Score of >or=16. The Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma organization Practice Management Guidelines committee set out to develop an EBM guideline for the screening, diagnosis, and treatment of BCVI. METHODS: A computerized search of the National Library of Medicine/National Institute of Health, Medline database was performed using citations from 1965 to 2005 inclusive. Titles and abstracts were reviewed to determine relevance, and isolated case reports, small case series, editorials, letters to the editor, and review articles were eliminated. The bibliographies of the resulting full-text articles were searched for other relevant citations, and these were obtained as needed. These papers were reviewed based on the following questions: 1. What patients are of high enough risk, so that diagnostic evaluation should be pursued for the screening and diagnosis of BCVI? 2. What is the appropriate modality for the screening and diagnosis of BCVI? 3. How should BCVI be treated? 4. If indicated, for how long should antithrombotic therapy be administered? 5. How should one monitor the response to therapy? RESULTS: One hundred seventy-nine articles were selected for review, and of these, 68 met inclusion criteria and are excerpted in the attached evidentiary table and used to make recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: The East Practice Management Guidelines Committee suggests guidelines that should be safe and efficacious for the screening, diagnosis, and treatment of BCVI. Risk factors for screening are identified (see ), screening modalities are reviewed indicating that although angiography remains the gold standard, multi-planar (>or==8 slice) CT angiography may be equivalent, and treatment algorithms are evaluated. It is noted that change in the diagnosis and management of this injury constellation is rapid due to technological advancement and the difficulties inherent in performing randomized prospective trials in this patient population.


Asunto(s)
Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Arteria Vertebral/lesiones , Heridas no Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Heridas no Penetrantes/terapia , Adulto , Traumatismos de las Arterias Carótidas/diagnóstico , Traumatismos de las Arterias Carótidas/epidemiología , Niño , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Angiografía por Resonancia Magnética , Medición de Riesgo , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Stents , Heridas no Penetrantes/cirugía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA